White House’s chilling warning about midterm elections: ‘Can’t guarantee an ICE agent won’t be around polling locations’

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/white-house-midterms-2026-warning-ice-b2914933.html

Threat of stationing immigration agents around voting locations has become a concern as it can be a deterrent to legal residents of color who are concerned they may be harassed by federal agents

The White House refused to rule out following through on the threat of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents being sent out to “surround the polls” when voters cast ballots in this November’s midterm elections as a way of depressing Democratic turnout and boosting chances of Republican victories in the House of Representatives and Senate.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday said she could offer “no guarantee” that ICE personnel would not be stationed at polling sites when Americans are in the process of choosing whether to extend the Republican stranglehold on power at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

She had been asked about former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon’s recent call for Trump to deploy ICE around election sites on his War Room podcast on Tuesday, just days after Trump himself called for a Republican “takeover” of vote-counting in Democratic-led states and municipalities.

478 points · 99 comments · view on lemmy.world

99 Comments

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 113 pts · 191d (3 replies)

Democratic leadership is sleepwalking us into a permanent state of authoritarian rule.

French75@slrpnk.net · 35 pts · 191d

That's not fair. They are still working super hard to disarm the people in blue states.

varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 191d (1 reply)

I think it's open jealousy about how you can get away with practically anything from undermining constitutional amendments to profit personally - all without seemingly being held accountable.

UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 191d

Like not being held accountable for supporting a genocide because of First Past The Post voting forces people to vote for democrats?

DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 97 pts · 191d (2 replies)

The very act of floating this idea is election fraud. Even if they don't do it, threatening to do it could discourage voters.

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 191d (1 reply)

We can offer no guarantee that democrat voters won't be harmed, detained or even murdered while voting.

FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 191d

Republican voters are probably gonna get harassed, arrested, or killed too if they happen to not be white. Then there will be outcry from Republicans who were perfectly fine with it happening to democrats

daannii@lemmy.world · 64 pts · 191d (4 replies)

When Obama ran, local organizations rented vans and escorted people to and from polls.

We can do it again if needed.

digredior@lemmynsfw.com · 20 pts · 191d (3 replies)

Honestly, idk why it stopped. That shit enables better voter turnout…

jaybone@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Those vans would make nice targets for ICE.

daannii@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 191d

Well even a regular car can hold 3 to 4 guests.

So even if people drive around all day with their one car, one person can potentially get 30 people to the polls.

GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 191d

Ding ding ding!

TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works · 41 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Obviously.

This is obviously where it was going.

From day one, from the first lie, to the arming of his own private army, this has been the goal. Obviously.

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 191d

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

No one's accused Americans of being smart.

HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 191d

"Back when it was step 3, all the alarmists were warning me about how bad step 10 will be. Now that we're at step 7, the logical thing to do is continue to accuse people of being alarmist."

  • 9 out of 10 Americans (real Americans)
Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip · 35 pts · 191d (6 replies)

Republicans have stolen every presidential election they've won since 2000. There haven't been consequences yet, and the future won't be any different unless we stand up.

AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 191d

They tried damn hard to steal the ones they lost as well, and know that because of the last year they may not get voted for, for another couple decades. They know they can't win, so they are abandoning democracy.

ameancow@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 191d (4 replies)
[ removed ]
AA5B@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 191d (3 replies)

Yes, but also I’m not convinced they haven’t done so by voter suppression. I’ve seen a lot fewer articles on that and that may not be part of voter fraud invests. There continue to be way too many attempts to suppress votes. How do you even count how many votes didn’t happen?

And it only needs to happen in swing states. You combine that with gerrymandering and it doesn’t have to prevent many voters to make a difference

WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Exactly. Look back at the Jim Crow era. That's the goal. Jim Crow didn't work by white people stealing the vote. It worked by writing laws that openly made it so black people couldn't vote. Ultimately it's a lot more sustainable to simply write laws that serve your side than it is to try to hold onto power by repeated election fraud. With the latter, you ultimately have to worry about the military just refusing to acknowledge clearly fraudulent elections. But if the elections are crooked but entirely within the law? Much more difficult for the military to refuse to acknowledge those.

itistime@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 191d

you ultimately have to worry about the military just refusing to acknowledge clearly fraudulent elections

You put too much faith in the military not being full of fascist sycophants and those going along to get along.

ameancow@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d
[ removed ]
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 191d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
Wilco@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 191d

It goes beyond this. Voter intimidation is classified federally as an "active threat". This is basically a hostile crime that can be dealt with via lethal force. The constitution is built to deal with this. Camping outside poll locations and blocking entry is a crime, and it can be deal with as a crime.

unmarkedbot@sh.itjust.works · 24 pts · 191d (6 replies)
[ removed ]
I_Jedi@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 191d (5 replies)

I can definitely see ICE agents prowling around the voting places looking over people's shoulders at who they voted for.

"I see you're voting for AOC. Time to die, friend."

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org · 6 pts · 191d (4 replies)

AOC somersaults out of the shadows and karate chops the agent in the throat so hard his head comes clean off

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Shia Labeouf

troglodytis@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Normal Tuesday night

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 191d

(Shia Labeouf)

watson387@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 191d

This is getting me hot. Tell me more.

AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Oh no what happens if ICE agents around polling locations are shot dead.

kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 18 pts · 191d

Everyone else at the polling place leaves and probably doesn't come back.

Polling location(maybe others) are now closed for public safety from the radical left Democrats.

Magnum@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 191d

Will not happen.

Arghblarg@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 191d (6 replies)

Let everyone you know that mail-in ballots are still an option... but educate them that they must bring the ballot to the post office IN PERSON, and ask the postal staff to post-mark it IN FRONT OF THEM. I have read (please correct me if I'm wrong!) that works around the recent regulation change that allows dropped-off post to be stamped when it's delivered, instead of when it's first dropped off, which is a rat-fucking tactic to increase the likelihood of ballots being marked late, knowing they'll probably take many days from drop-off to delivery.

ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com · 7 pts · 191d (2 replies)

That's effectively what's happening.

The USPS, under DeJoy (who has long been trying to undermine the USPS from within), has posted this site, which attempts to debunk (i.e., gaslight) over what the change is. They claim the same process applies and only is being clarified, but that's false since now postmarks will use the process rather than the sending date and that's a major change. This is key:

While we are not changing our postmarking practices, we have made adjustments to our transportation operations that will result in some mailpieces not arriving at our originating processing facilities on the same day that they are mailed. This means that the date on the postmarks applied at our processing facilities will not necessarily match the date on which the customer’s mailpiece was collected by a letter carrier or dropped off at a retail location. [emphasis added]

This is entirely to help support GOP legal challenges that will claim that laws which allow election-day postmarked mail-in ballots to be counted can be struck down, because they will encompass votes that took place after election day, and therefore selectively invalidate mail-in ballots. It's essentially poisoning the reliability of postmarks to allow for ballot suppression.

Here's a PBS story about it as well. It also notes that the staffing crunches at the USPS and closing processing facilities will exacerbate the issue since "processing" times will increase, especially for high-volume days like election day.

Edit: David Steiner, not DeJoy, is the current postmaster general.

Arghblarg@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Bloody hell, why aren't the Democrats doing everything they can to kick DeJoy out?? What a travesty.

ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 191d

Well, I double-checked and nevermind, DeJoy was out in July of 2025. The new guy is David Steiner, who I suppose the dates make responsible for this.

thesohoriots@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

Yes however I can attest that some states make it easier than others to do mail-in. For example: WA, automatic mail-in, no questions asked. NC, you need to request it, then have your voting observed and certified by either two witnesses or a notary. Every step of the way highly encourages using your driver’s license number or including a copy, otherwise you have to complete more paperwork. THEN you have to take it to the post office to get marked etc. You also go on a list of absentee voters after it is tallied — a nice little target. I used to do it out of spite until it was just too inconvenient compared to early voting.

CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 191d

I live in WA and just drop them off at the county provided ballot boxes, no post office required. There are more of the drop boxes than post offices too.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

in california at least you can still bring your absentee ballot to your polling location to drop off. mine is open a week ahead of time, they got someone sitting there with a ballot box.

FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 191d (2 replies)

How the fuck did we get to a point where it's normal for the government to say these things?

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 191d

Conservatives stopped respecting our Constitution and our nation as a whole.

But they're pretty good at showing up to vote, unlike many other Americans. That, combined with our electoral system being a joke and designed to allow a minority to have control, and you've got our current situation.

UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 191d

Capitalism

Saljid@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 191d (1 reply)

This is what Hitler's SA did, so that's to be totally expected.

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 191d

It's sad how accurate this is...

AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 191d (1 reply)

You know Jan 6 rioters with guns and pipe bombs who attacked officers got pardon.

Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 191d

And employment.

SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 191d (1 reply)

It can't be guaranteed that an ICE jackass won't be shipped to the local junkyard.

lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 191d

I'll believe it when I see it

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Can't guarantee I won't communicate with my community to show up to the polling stations with a large group of armed citizens to ensure we can vote safely without the interference of terrorists.

Doesn't stop them from ratfucking the votes after they're submitted, but hey, gotta do what we can.

itistime@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 191d

I hear ya, but consider that will make a VERY tense situation that will likely deter voters from engaging.

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 191d (9 replies)

bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -6 pts · 191d (8 replies)

How would that lead to a good outcome?

ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Dead Nazis is always a good outcome.

edible_funk@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

The only good nazi is a dead nazi.

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 191d

But seriously, people giving their lives for democracy and so that others can enjoy the inalienable rights they were promised is a good outcome.

It's the only possible good outcome from this scenario.

If your take on this is genuinely "do nothing, give up democracy, because they might kill even more people than they already have" then you're a coward and your rights and democracy were always going to be taken from you anyway.

ICE agents should not come to the polls on election day unless they are ready to die for it.

athatet@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 191d

I mean, they aren’t leaving us a whole lot of boxes left to choose from.

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 191d

How would it lead to a bad outcome?

I_Jedi@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 191d (1 reply)

ICE agents would get to ask God firsthand about whether what they're doing is right.

kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 191d

There is no God or hell. They would just be dead Nazis. I'm ok with that.

dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 191d

That's the neat part. This device is designed such that "out comes the lead."

Doomsider@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 191d

Can you imagine getting abducted when you try to vote? Now you don't have to!

I am sure this will help the voter turnout and is definitely not a thinly veiled threat meant to cause voter suppression.

itistime@infosec.pub · 9 pts · 191d

Gear up, the hopefools will learn too late.

Formfiller@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 191d

Well I guess we’re going to be exercising our second amendment rights because that’s tyranny.

Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 191d (5 replies)

This is dicey. If it happens, there will be a lot of problems around the polling areas. The fascists will use that as an excuse to invalidate the results.

French75@slrpnk.net · 13 pts · 191d (4 replies)

They will have 100 different reasons to invalidate the results anyway.

kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 191d (3 replies)

They will have 100 different reasons to invalidate the results anyway.

It's crazy to think they don't already have them loaded up.

TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d (1 reply)

they already had their "one of ours, all of yours" slogan and couldn't even wait until they had a martyr to parade it out. So much for the violent left.

TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

I supposed the Chinese are less likely to use it against us at this point.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

100

99 because hilary ain't running. sorry.

amikulo@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 191d (1 reply)

I don't know what the conditions will be for my blue city in a red state come November. My plan is to vote early and spend election day seeking out ICE at any polling locations to film and heckle them. If they want to arrest me, my vote is already in and it will take them out of play for their role threatening voters. MN is showing us how we massively outnumber them and can stymie their tactics.

I_Jedi@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 191d

Their goal will be to "assist" purple states with their voting. I predict big ICE deployments to Pennsylvania this year.

BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Why is she so obsessed with getting ICE agents killed?

DronePirate@discuss.tchncs.de · 9 pts · 191d (1 reply)

So they can escalate.

BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 191d

Escalate how? They don't hold the flyover sovereign and they are actively losing control of territory. Their navy is spent and overspending, the national guard has its fucking jugular hanging open in every small town, and they're about to commit the army to Iran. If all they have is ICE and CPB they are going to have a very bad time.

UncleArthur@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 191d (4 replies)

Weird. I didn't realise all the American polling stations are located so near the borders with other countries.

BlueEther@no.lastname.nz · 5 pts · 191d (3 replies)

I read somewhere that anywhere within 250 mile (I think this was the number) of an airport counts as a boarder

kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 191d

Wouldn't it need to be an international airport at minimum?

Tower@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 190d

100 miles.

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone

This one is older, but has the great image showing just how many cities are in that 100 miles:
https://www.southernborder.org/100_mile_border_enforcement_zone

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 191d

i heard it was 100 from an international airport (not domestic, we have a domestic airport in my town but not an international. the difference is it's basically one of those little take your own plane airports. also full of explosives because it's run by raytheon but y'know) and because i'm on the internet and you're not my fact is more true

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 191d

That's atrocious.

AccoSpoot@lemmynsfw.com · 7 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Can't guarantee that antifa won't be around polling locations...

Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 191d (1 reply)

Don't need Antifa. Regular Americans will do just fine. Anyone who believes in democracy and the right of citizens to vote will do just fine.

Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 191d

Anyone who believes in democracy and the right of citizens to vote

That's antifa. Democracy is anti-fascist.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 191d

Prominent Republicans have been saying this kind of thing, in various ways, since at least the 1980s. If people want to delude themselves and call standard Republican stuff "trumpism" or even more incoherent and nebulous things like "maga", I don't know what to tell them. This is stock conservative/Republican stuff.

This is Paul Weyrich in 1980:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw

sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Imagine the optics of these rabid dogs pepper spraying people in line to vote

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 191d (1 reply)

The optics don't need to get any worse, they're already murdering people in broad daylight...

sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 191d

Yeah, I guess we're kind if past the Ghandi trap's efficacy at this point. I don't know why I keep reverting to previous stages of how this escalated

LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 191d (1 reply)

I got PTO, i don't mind protecting people and staying at the voting place all day to protect them from the ICE thugs taking them to a concentration camp.

LordCrom@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

Problem is people won't show if they fear ICE will attest yhem, even if they are citizens as ICE has already proven.

Its intimidation

Triumph@fedia.io · 4 pts · 191d

"Can't guarantee we won't continue to violate the law with impunity."

baller_w@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 191d (2 replies)

Honest question: there’s not that many of them to cover a substantial number of polling stations, are there? If memory serves, there like 16k agents.

Seems like the WH is on its bullshit again.

RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 191d

At this point they can deploy noone and it will still have the desired effect. People are scared already.

Tower@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 190d

The threat of appearance will be enough for a not insignificant number of people. But also, they can use historical voting numbers to selectively target certain locations. No need to send anyone to the R+17 or the D+22 districts.

Should_Have_Done_Better@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 191d (3 replies)

Sounds like a good reason to pretend to support their bullshit and go vote against it anyway.....register independent then vote however

The declaration of party only helps metrics not the actual outcome of the vote

AA5B@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 191d

I’m sure it doesn’t matter what party you register as, but this is purely racist.

They’re not saying they’ll interfere with elections but they may kidnap anyone who looks like an undocumented immigrant who shouldn’t vote. Generally that’s been people with brown skin.

As a white person who is registered Democrat, I wouldn’t be worried at all. However if I were Hispanic or otherwise not obviously white, I sure as hell would be, and may decide I can’t risk voting

This is exactly what Black Panthers tried to solve half a century ago

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 191d

If you register independent that prevents you from participating in the large party primaries in many (most/all?) states. You can only vote in the primary for your registered party. So that also locks you out of at least attempting to prevent the Democrats from incessantly fielding dumbass GOP-lite candidates like they've been doing.

Theoretically if you register as Republican that also allows you to surreptitiously torpedo their worst candidates in their primaries, but it's unlikely we'll get enough trolls on board to swing the needle meaningfully with that strategy.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 191d

Or differently sounds like a good reason to have black panthers show up and watch ice

BeautifulMind@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 191d

Thats not a warning intended to keep the public safe, it's a threat intended to get the public to give up on democracy

switcheroo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 190d

Fucking brown shirts

cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 190d

Every voter come armed.

Hayduke@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 191d

We the People of the United States can.