While I don't doubt many athletes are being quite active.
I'd also believe it's a joke at this point for them to all take as many as they can no matter if they intend to use them or not.
There was an article a few years ago where a few athletes were interviewed anonymously IIRC. It's a fuckfest. You put a lot of people in peak physical shape together, what are you expecting?
Also people who by and large havent been out living wild social lives for quite a while. Laser beam focused on one goal. Once you have competed, one way or another the pressure is off and you are surrounded by people who are in the exact same position.
In France, they gave 300k condoms. That's 30x the amount they gave here. And they used them all in France, how long the fuck did they think those 10k would last?
For what it's worth, there are more people at the summer Olympics than the winter ones (~10,500 in Paris and ~2,900 at Milan according to Wikipedia) but still one would think there should at least be 1/4 as much if they're just looking at athlete numbers alone.
10k for 20 days of olympic and for 3k athletes that is 10k * 2 / 20 / 3k = 1/3 of a condom per couple per day, that sounds down right reasonable for a bunch of young, perfectly shaped teenagers constantly in celebration mode.
Because we have statistics for how many male olympians are there, but no stats for how many couples are there. It's worth remembering that olympians don't have to shack up with other olympians. Many of them brought partners, and I would bet at least a few are asexual.
My thought was "per olympian penis", but I admit it doesn't account for non-olympian penises.
If enough people are in the market, have egg or sperm donor companies call people who medal.
considers
Looking down the road, because my expectation is that sooner or later, we're going to be doing human genetic engineering, a company getting Olympian genetic material like that might be --- as long as they can operate in a legal jurisdiction that doesn't prohibit human genetic engineering --- better off just calling up medalists and licensing their DNA. I don't think that you can copyright DNA under current US case law, though it might be patentable.
As of 2016, genetic sequences were not recognized as copyrightable subject matter by any jurisdiction.[3] The United States Copyright Office's position is that "DNA sequences and other genetic, biological, or chemical substances or compounds, regardless of whether they are man-made or produced by nature," are ideas, systems, or discoveries rather than copyrightable works of authorship.[15]: 23
You might not need to copyright or patent it, though, if you can just keep the changes you make secret. I mean, you get sperm/egg from Random Person, you do your proprietary modifications, you generate an embryo, you implant. I'm not sure how hard it would be for some other company to reverse-engineer the changes by looking at people's DNA relative to background noise in the DNA.
A large majority of countries (96 out of 106) surveyed have policy documents-legislation, regulations, guidelines, codes, and international treaties-relevant to the use of genome editing to modify early-stage human embryos, gametes, or their precursor cells. Most of these 96 countries do not have policies that specifically address the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos in laboratory research (germline genome editing); of those that do, 23 prohibit this research and 11 explicitly permit it. Seventy-five of the 96 countries prohibit the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos to initiate a pregnancy (heritable genome editing). Five of these 75 countries provide exceptions to their prohibitions. No country explicitly permits heritable human genome editing.
The thing is that in practice, if you want in vitro implantation, you can probably just travel abroad to a jurisdiction that doesn't prohibit it, unless countries assert extraterritorial jurisdiction that attaches to their citizens. If someone wants an Olympianized kid, I imagine that traveling abroad isn't that much additional barrier. Extraterrorial jurisdiction exists, but it is very rare; prohibitions on child sex tourism are one notable example that a number of countries do.
I would like to overcome my limitations in this fashion. Aside from my tongue and naughty bits, the human body doesn't offer me any experience that I enjoy.
It would be like Robot Wars, but with a lot more strategies. Rock wall climb? Hover boots, piledriver spikes, gecko skin, and so on. Someone should make an anime or show focused on robosports.
Wishing to become just a brain in a robot body sadly misunderstands the totality of the human body. It’s been shown that gut biome affects mental health, for example.
One would assume that a robotic body would have devices and supplement cartridges for that, automatically monitored and regulated. The human body is a machine - but a robotic version would be actually optimally designed, rather than an endless variety of useful accidents. Even better, you can move the brain into different vessel shapes, each built for a particular purpose.
In any case, converting a fleshy brain's memories into an computerized format would be preferable. Unfortunately, I suspect that is hard to pull off without being lossy or fatal.
Eugenics have a bad rep since they were popularized by nazis. But hey - animal rights and identification documents were also initially nazi ideas and they gained traction.
I just hope, that when eugenics come back to public light again, they will come out of EU (regulated to hell and back) instead of USA or China. It's one thing to eliminate genetic diseases or such, but completely another thing with steering people into some dystopian genetic hellhole.
I found myself in Italy
They said we could have condoms free
All partnered up by two or three
Everyone partook with glee
But now none are left for me
So hearken friends
My luck portends
This story ends
For me unfortunately
I skied directly into a tree
Then rolled the dice in the dormitory
It now burns badly when I pee
I hope my mom is proud of me
I only brought home an STD
Yeah sounds like PR at this point. They probably release this press message every year right when viewership and interest drops when the Olympics is halfway done.
10'000 is super low, I remember hearing about one or two hundred thousand in recent years. I guess that was regular and not winter, but still. No wonder they ran out.
It has nothing to do with one's ability to detect text tone better than another cohort. It is simply using the brain for a split second to evaluate which is more likely; a pro-AIDS misogynistic Lemmy user, or someone taking the piss on the fact Lemmy users are much the opposite.
It is clearly "Amiright, guys?" character humour and really only requires some minimal effort to realise that.
Though, at this point it really doesn't matter as those that think for themselves by looking at what others thought (the vote counters) will contribute by following suit.
78 Comments
Steve@communick.news · 143 pts · 188d
While I don't doubt many athletes are being quite active.
I'd also believe it's a joke at this point for them to all take as many as they can no matter if they intend to use them or not.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 46 pts · 188d
There was an article a few years ago where a few athletes were interviewed anonymously IIRC. It's a fuckfest. You put a lot of people in peak physical shape together, what are you expecting?
Delphia@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 187d
Also people who by and large havent been out living wild social lives for quite a while. Laser beam focused on one goal. Once you have competed, one way or another the pressure is off and you are surrounded by people who are in the exact same position.
TheRealKuni@piefed.social · 10 pts · 187d
Or, due to physicality and flexibility, some new positions!
massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 40 pts · 188d
You roll initiative onto someone and they pull out one of these bad boys, and I call that a 'power move'.
Anivia@feddit.org · 17 pts · 187d
A few years ago an athlete said in an interview that they are Olympics branded condoms, so he stuffed his backpack full of them
AA5B@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 188d
Let them. How is this not huge free publicity!
Avicenna@programming.dev · 2 pts · 186d
That is what I imagine too, stuffing handfuls of them to a bag to give to friends etc as a cheeky present or keep as a trophy to impress dates.
AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social · 89 pts · 188d
In France, they gave 300k condoms. That's 30x the amount they gave here. And they used them all in France, how long the fuck did they think those 10k would last?
zikzak025@lemmy.world · 47 pts · 188d
For what it's worth, there are more people at the summer Olympics than the winter ones (~10,500 in Paris and ~2,900 at Milan according to Wikipedia) but still one would think there should at least be 1/4 as much if they're just looking at athlete numbers alone.
coherent_domain@infosec.pub · 31 pts · 188d
10k for 20 days of olympic and for 3k athletes that is 10k * 2 / 20 / 3k = 1/3 of a condom per couple per day, that sounds down right reasonable for a bunch of young, perfectly shaped teenagers constantly in celebration mode.
mracton@piefed.social · 27 pts · 188d
I wouldn’t want to share a condom with two other couples each day. That’s barbaric. /j
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de · 11 pts · 188d
I think Brazil gave out 400.000
Sabin10@lemmy.world · 79 pts · 188d
That's less than 4 per athlete, not sure why they thought that would be enough.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 188d
They ended up only having a little over 2 per athlete after Condoms Georg took 4,000 for balloon animals.
flightyhobler@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 188d
Per athlete or pair of athletes? I'm too lazy to Google
Susaga@sh.itjust.works · 27 pts · 188d
Per athlete. It's about 6 and a half per male athlete.
Tangent5280@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 187d
Which poor guy has half a Dingdong?
Susaga@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 187d
You got the numbers backwards. This is one guy who has 6 and a half condoms worth of dingdong.
elucubra@sopuli.xyz · -3 pts · 187d
Why do you specify "male" athlete?
Unless being used for onanism, it's one condom per couple, although trios and other combos, and non penetrative sex probably fudge the math a little).
Susaga@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 187d
Because we have statistics for how many male olympians are there, but no stats for how many couples are there. It's worth remembering that olympians don't have to shack up with other olympians. Many of them brought partners, and I would bet at least a few are asexual.
My thought was "per olympian penis", but I admit it doesn't account for non-olympian penises.
elucubra@sopuli.xyz · 0 pts · 186d
So, women aren't likely to bring a condom to a fight?
If you are a woman, agreeable to sex, and don't carry condoms for your own protection, you are an idiot.
danc4498@lemmy.world · 78 pts · 188d
You want more olympians, this is how you get more olympians.
tal@lemmy.today · 16 pts · 188d
If enough people are in the market, have egg or sperm donor companies call people who medal.
considers
Looking down the road, because my expectation is that sooner or later, we're going to be doing human genetic engineering, a company getting Olympian genetic material like that might be --- as long as they can operate in a legal jurisdiction that doesn't prohibit human genetic engineering --- better off just calling up medalists and licensing their DNA. I don't think that you can copyright DNA under current US case law, though it might be patentable.
investigates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_genetic_sequences
You might not need to copyright or patent it, though, if you can just keep the changes you make secret. I mean, you get sperm/egg from Random Person, you do your proprietary modifications, you generate an embryo, you implant. I'm not sure how hard it would be for some other company to reverse-engineer the changes by looking at people's DNA relative to background noise in the DNA.
searches
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33095042/
The thing is that in practice, if you want in vitro implantation, you can probably just travel abroad to a jurisdiction that doesn't prohibit it, unless countries assert extraterritorial jurisdiction that attaches to their citizens. If someone wants an Olympianized kid, I imagine that traveling abroad isn't that much additional barrier. Extraterrorial jurisdiction exists, but it is very rare; prohibitions on child sex tourism are one notable example that a number of countries do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction
EDIT: Replaced the text and citation for the legal overview, as it looks like the earlier link was to a spam site that copied it.
SARGE@startrek.website · 16 pts · 188d
stephan262@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 188d
I have a feeling it's gonna be a long road, getting from here to there with eugenics. I'd much rather use technology to overcome our limitations.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 188d
I would like to overcome my limitations in this fashion. Aside from my tongue and naughty bits, the human body doesn't offer me any experience that I enjoy.
electrotabby@piefed.social · 3 pts · 187d
I would watch the cybernetic olympics.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 187d
It would be like Robot Wars, but with a lot more strategies. Rock wall climb? Hover boots, piledriver spikes, gecko skin, and so on. Someone should make an anime or show focused on robosports.
frank@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 188d
MurrayL@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 187d
Wishing to become just a brain in a robot body sadly misunderstands the totality of the human body. It’s been shown that gut biome affects mental health, for example.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 187d
One would assume that a robotic body would have devices and supplement cartridges for that, automatically monitored and regulated. The human body is a machine - but a robotic version would be actually optimally designed, rather than an endless variety of useful accidents. Even better, you can move the brain into different vessel shapes, each built for a particular purpose.
In any case, converting a fleshy brain's memories into an computerized format would be preferable. Unfortunately, I suspect that is hard to pull off without being lossy or fatal.
HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub · 3 pts · 188d
Eugenics have a bad rep since they were popularized by nazis. But hey - animal rights and identification documents were also initially nazi ideas and they gained traction.
I just hope, that when eugenics come back to public light again, they will come out of EU (regulated to hell and back) instead of USA or China. It's one thing to eliminate genetic diseases or such, but completely another thing with steering people into some dystopian genetic hellhole.
leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 188d
Forget in vitro, just CRISPR that shit into my DNA!
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 188d
Sir, we did it, we got Olympian sperm!
Excellent, what sport?
Shot put
Fuck.
GraniteM@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 188d
Seems fine to me.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 188d
lol I didn’t mean anything by it, if those two had a kid it would be a real life Gaston
daddycool@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 188d
Um, that's not how condoms works.
danc4498@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 187d
If only they didn’t run out of them.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 52 pts · 188d
I don’t see why condom companies aren’t shipping in truckloads for free. You can’t beat that kind of publicity. L
Heikki2@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 188d
This reads like the startn of Dr Seuss erotica
krashmo@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 188d
I found myself in Italy
They said we could have condoms free
All partnered up by two or three
Everyone partook with glee
But now none are left for me
So hearken friends
My luck portends
This story ends
For me unfortunately
I skied directly into a tree
Then rolled the dice in the dormitory
It now burns badly when I pee
I hope my mom is proud of me
I only brought home an STD
AA5B@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 187d
That’s great
qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website · 9 pts · 188d
🤔
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 44 pts · 188d
Young, fit and healthy athletes, following intense build up and cumulative training are ready to peak explosively, just about now.
fubarx@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 188d
If I was an athlete and there were condoms with Olympic logo branding getting handed out, I would SO hoard them for souvenirs. Can you imagine?
They're in Italy. There are farmacie all over the place. They can get store-brand ones.
Edit: Yup. Olympic Games branding. Goes in the scrapbook album. Unused, mind you.
Edit 2: https://lemmy.world/post/43193842
T156@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 188d
Plus they're officially branded, not some knockoff. It would be an amazing gag gift.
harrybo93@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 187d
gag gift??? Wrong kink, my friend
linux_penguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 187d
They’d need quite a lot of them (which they don’t have) but I suppose they could make it work
eager_eagle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 187d
Atomic@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 187d
You have thousands of athletes, who are in the best shape of their lives. 20-30 years old. It's hardly surprising they hook up with eachother.
I don't think they grab them for the logo. I'm pretty sure they are being used, frequently.
Allero@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 186d
Also likely having very high testosterone levels
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 39 pts · 188d
Doesn’t this happen virtually every year?
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 187d
Yeah sounds like PR at this point. They probably release this press message every year right when viewership and interest drops when the Olympics is halfway done.
DrBob@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 188d
Best souvenir going. But also a lot of young people in peak physical condition. As someone I know commented "everyone is 10/10 from the neck down."
Infrapink@thebrainbin.org · 11 pts · 188d
And those people have higher than average testosterone, so they're hornier. Apparently Olympic Village is a small orgy, hence all the condoms.
Gumus@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 188d
There are 3000 people there. That's no small orgy.
Infrapink@thebrainbin.org · 1 pts · 187d
They're not all shagging at the same time
DrBob@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 187d
Of course not. They have to get dressed to compete at their other sport at some point.
Fleur_@aussie.zone · 12 pts · 188d
All because of Jimmy fucksalot and his massive cock
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 188d
he dropped his magnum condom for his magnum dong.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 188d
10'000 is super low, I remember hearing about one or two hundred thousand in recent years. I guess that was regular and not winter, but still. No wonder they ran out.
X@piefed.world · 4 pts · 188d
Winter Olympics, probably fewer people than the summer Olympics, where they had 300k.
Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 188d
And I find condoms past the expiration date.
tired_n_bored@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 188d
I wonder why they don't carry some from home lol
Bloomcole@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 187d
No problem, they can get fingered by the Canadians
Bot@sub.community · 1 pts · 188d
You can only do missionary in Italia! Condom is ungodly.
Treczoks@lemmy.world · -11 pts · 188d
Check who took them. Could be people from poorer countries, where condoms are expensive.
Could be random religious zealots who are envious (or worse) of people actually heaving sex.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 188d
10k literally just isn't enough. Summer Olympics where there are 3-4x more athletes tend to have hundreds of thousands in stock.
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -26 pts · 188d
It's ok. They have AIDS drugs now and dudes can't get pregnant
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 188d
You think there are no female athletes?
saltesc@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 188d
I'm astounded so many of you cannot pick up the sarcasm in, "it's okay to get AIDS" and "women what?"
At times, I swear the levels of acumen here flirt with Facebook's.
X@piefed.world · 6 pts · 188d
I’m astounded you’d assume the average sarcasm detection acuity would be much different here than on Facebook.
There’s no correlation between having a federated account and high sarcasm detection success. Poe’s law wasn’t developed out of sheer boredom.
saltesc@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 188d
It has nothing to do with one's ability to detect text tone better than another cohort. It is simply using the brain for a split second to evaluate which is more likely; a pro-AIDS misogynistic Lemmy user, or someone taking the piss on the fact Lemmy users are much the opposite.
It is clearly "Amiright, guys?" character humour and really only requires some minimal effort to realise that.
Though, at this point it really doesn't matter as those that think for themselves by looking at what others thought (the vote counters) will contribute by following suit.
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 188d
Well this is certainly refreshing. Enjoy your weekend!
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 188d
I've been seeing users of a mgtow instance, so the first option really isn't that unlikely.
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 188d
I think Lemmy has a higher than average percentage of neurotypical people who don't pick up sarcasm at all.
Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one · 1 pts · 188d
These are athletes in top condition. There are probably less STDs than the general population.
celeste@kbin.earth · 11 pts · 188d
That attitude has you going home from the olympics with 5 STDs
TexasDrunk@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 188d
"Did you bring home the gold?"
"I brought home something"