Biological Women

783 points · 70 comments · view on lemmy.world

70 Comments

zakobjoa@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 131d (1 reply)

I prefer asymmetrical women.

Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 130d

Not to be confused with assmetrical women (they can use their derrieres to accurately measure things).

realitista@lemmus.org · 47 pts · 131d (10 replies)

Not to be "that guy" but I think they are mixing their metaphors here. "Biological weapon" is the comparison they're making, not "biological war" which isn't something I think exists,

So examples like "chemical woman", "woman of mass destruction" work, whereas "total woman" or "guerrilla woman" do not.

abbadon420@sh.itjust.works · 53 pts · 131d (3 replies)

I was thinking "biological warfare". Which still doesn't fit all the references, but I'll write it off as "artistic liberty"

Klear@quokk.au · 13 pts · 131d

But that would imply scientific liberty, engineering liberty and, worst of all, AI slop liberty.

realitista@lemmus.org · 4 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Warfare of attrition? Warfare of mass distruction? There are, I guess, ways to say those things properly, but these aren't them.

atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 130d

those are said by other people though

protist@retrofed.com · 11 pts · 131d (2 replies)

I assumed it was "warfare," and for that every example works

realitista@lemmus.org · 1 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Warfare of attrition? Warfare of mass distruction? There are, I guess, ways to say those things properly, but these aren't them.

protist@retrofed.com · 2 pts · 130d

I suppose I was talking about the tweet and not the response to the tweet

ieGod@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 131d

Ah, a shit post enjoyer of refined taste I see.

Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 131d

I dunno, referring to somebody as a "total weapon" is very valid here

silver@das-eck.haus · 4 pts · 131d

It's warfare. The only one that doesn't fit is "of mass destruction"

gressen@lemmy.zip · 34 pts · 131d

Women on drugs.

GandalftheBlack@feddit.org · 28 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Fog of woman

IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 131d

some girls are gassy

prettybunnys@piefed.social · 26 pts · 131d (2 replies)

Woman of mass destruction

My sister in law

IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Woman of ass destruction.

Pegging

prettybunnys@piefed.social · 10 pts · 131d

I think my sister in law probably still qualifies if I know my brother …

Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 25 pts · 131d (1 reply)

blitzfrau

Sunsofold@lemmings.world · 7 pts · 131d

Black Metal Ist Frau

SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Siege Women

Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club · 2 pts · 130d

Of which mass counterweight women are my fav!!

sxt@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 131d (2 replies)

Improvised woman

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 131d

Would that be 1d6 for the damage die?

BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 130d

Born again woman?

mr_stank@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 131d (2 replies)

The ultra rare three day special woman operation

knightly@pawb.social · 6 pts · 131d

Now there's a euphemism. XD

SlurpingPus@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 130d

In and out in twenty minutes.

massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 13 pts · 131d

Pyrrhic women?

abbadon420@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 131d (3 replies)

Womanhammer

Rusty@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 131d (2 replies)

Womanhammer 40k or Womanhammer Fantasy Battle?

Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 5 pts · 131d (1 reply)

star woman

Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 130d

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 131d (3 replies)

this use of the term "biological" is stupid

hrt and surgery are both most certainly "biological"

narwhal@mander.xyz · -2 pts · 130d (2 replies)

Straight and gay people still feel atracted to those with specific sexual traits, whether natural or artificially developed, so the description is still important for dating. Some people dont care much about gender, but still consider sex important. And of course physicians are rarely interested in gender either when diagnosing medical conditions. What concerns them is biology. So just because transphobes misuse terms to justify discrimination, that doesnt render those terms invalid.

Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 130d (1 reply)

A professional wouldn't actually use the term biological woman though because it's a made up right wing dog whistle and not a real medical term.

Also for like 99%+ of things your physician knowing your agab is completely irrelevant. Hormones change so much stuff like metabolism, bone density, blood proteins, etc so they really don't need to know at all unless you need to see someone for reproductive system specific problems.

Also, transgender people are not abiotic, or fake, or mechanical or whatever. Trans women are biological women and trans men are biological men. Describing someone as biological whatever is really dumb because all humans are biological so it's a completely redundant term.

narwhal@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 130d

Humans are all biological but there is an important distinction between sex and gender that i refuse to conflate, as that would be pseudoscientific. Both contribute to what is considered male/female, but one is biological/sexual, and the other is social/cultural. and yes, transwomen can be considered biological woman as well, although this cannot be an exact term, just like gender isnt. So you will never be able to say a person is exclusively one or the other. its just that some aspects of who they are are definitely biological, and some definitely arent. This is not made up. Also the sex you are identified as you are born is not the only factor for treatment. Physicians will definitelly want to know your hormone configuration has been changed because it affects body function in many ways, ultimately changing your sex.

wieson@feddit.org · 12 pts · 130d (1 reply)

OOP: warfare
OC1: war and warfare
OC2: weapons

It's not the same and it irks me. Thanks.

CptBread@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 130d

Agreed, though for me I'm fine with adding war, it's close enough to warfare.

inconel@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Cognitive women

knightly@pawb.social · 2 pts · 131d

Information Women

Economic Women

Marital Women

Gender Women

Siethron@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 130d

I think it actually implies the existence of mechanical women, aerodynamic women, thermodynamic women, ceramic women and computer women.

WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Woman of attrition lol

SlurpingPus@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 130d

Some people do wear you down.

Prikkeres@feddit.nl · 8 pts · 131d (2 replies)

I’d identify as a ballistic woman.

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 131d (1 reply)

you have a large mass and move at high speeds?

Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club · 4 pts · 130d

It's not the mass, it's the curvature of the curve they are undertaking ...
(I'm guessing, not trying to speak for them)

ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 131d

I've studied womanfare on the frontlines. I can tell you that women never change.

GraniteM@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 131d (1 reply)

Cyber women.

Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 1 pts · 131d
[ removed ]
MolochHorridus@piefed.social · 6 pts · 131d (3 replies)

There needs to be more women of mass destruction.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 131d

Women of Ass Destruction would be a very successful porn franchise.

lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 131d

And Women of Mass Distraction

massacre@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 131d

Snu Snu?

marzhall@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 130d

One Two Three Four

I declare a thumb Woman

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 131d

Ranged Women and Martial Women too

smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 131d

What of the Mother Of All Women??

Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 131d

"Action Stations! Threat priority Anti-Air Women Red!"

Pman@lemmy.org · 4 pts · 131d

There's also trade women, and economic women for less destructive solutions.

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 131d

the only time that the concept of "biological woman" matters is when you want to make children. every other time it just plainly doesn't matter.

thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz · 4 pts · 131d

Women of conquest.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 131d

Most of the women I've encountered in life seem to be engaged in a long-term siege. No breeching those walls.

BTW, they won't respond to slapping them with your "cannon balls." Just saving you the futile attempt.

carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 131d

Also missing: unitary women and cluster women

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 131d

What about maneuver women and women of attrition?

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 2 pts · 131d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 131d (2 replies)

Women Pigs?

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 3 pts · 131d

Wait... Shit.

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 131d
[ removed ]
rumba@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 131d

My wife checks most of those boxes. Now I can't tell if I have a thing....

fmtx@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 131d
[ removed ]
vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 115d

"biological man" and "biological woman" are just a transphobic dogwhistle and misgendering with extra steps

if you're on HRT your body works largely the same way a cis person with the same hormones would

rekabis@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 130d (1 reply)

Woman of mass destruction

Ah, these are rather common. Divorces are their weapon of choice.

More often than not, the man has his post-alimony earnings and net worth rolled back twenty years or more. Most never return to their prior economic level unless they’re young enough to compensate, and then they remain severely behind their peers, as well. Only the truly wealthy men - think $10M of net worth or more, and $250k+ earnings - can bounce back from a divorce like it’s nothing.

psud@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 128d

Women of mass destruction use anti value attacks