Free as in beer, not as in speech, and DaVinci Resolve at least has a $295 upgrade for additional features, although last time I looked that upgrade is included with certain hardware purchases from Blackmagic.
I still like the traditional model for paid software where you pay once, and then future major upgrades can be purchased for a discount; it seems like a fair way for the developer to support continued development while allowing the customer to decide if they prefer to stay on an older version.
Idk about the rest of the software on this list, but presenting gimp as an "alternative" to photoshop seems disingenuous to me.
Gimp is an alternative to photoshop in the same way that a 56K modem is an alternative to a 1 gig fiber line. Yes, they technically do the same job. But to suggest that your experience is going to be comparable to photoshop is a stretch.
I've been using Photoshop for 24 years and I gave Affinity a try. Affinity still has a lot of kinks to work out. Cross compatibility wrt brushes and tools is spotty at best, unusable at worst. UI and workflow/workspace definitely needs improvement. No right click to adjust brush size and no saveable workspace option was a dealbreaker for me.
I'm switching to Linux right now and I haven't really looked into replacements for each piece of software. Used Paint.net for at least 10 years, tried Gimp first but didn't like it. What do you use?
Dunno how advanced its vector graphics features are, but krita does support making them at least, you could try that. The overall interface is good at least.
Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.
Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?
The GUI/UX is shit. If you wanna design automated workflows from the shell, it can be quite flexible and powerful.
Like they used to have a website that would generate tags or like styled text. They used GIMP for the backend image generation. I thought that was a pretty impressive use case.
I'm pretty sure GIMP doesn't have any kind of UI or UX contributors… it's all "programmer design", where finding the rectangle select tool takes 5 minutes and it doesn't work the way you want it to
Davinci Resolve has a free version that is missing some features. They are important features, mind. But it definitely allows you to edit videos and get a good feel for the software to see if you want to purchase it or you can just keep using the free version even.
So it's free*.
And the paid version is buy once and get a perpetual license. Very non-scummy for a full professional video editing tool.
Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can't be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?
To be honest, I don't know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it's not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven't really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.
Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist's first time seeing a platypus and assuming it's an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn't software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!
They had an update earlier this year that really closed the gap on a lot of features and tools they were missing compared to other more established cad packages.
Difference beeing, you can download resolve onto your pc and use it forever without updating, even if they decide to cancel the free version or get bankrupt. Figma runs entirely web based and if Adobe buys it it can be killed off at any point.
Blender is an alternative to 3DS Max in the same way an actual car is an alternative to flintstoning a burnt out wreck. Even in college a lot of our very basic rendering exercises with Max got the whole grade just on demonstrating correct setup because the software is so prone to crashing or taking 20h to do what most alternatives (paid or free) can do in 20 minutes.
Yeh, admittedly I have a lot more experience with blender than 3DS Max, but from performance differences alone I'm pretty sure if Max released today without its massive pre-existing industry adoption it would be laughed out of the room.
You couldn't pay me to use Adobe. The predatory pricing, required internet, Linux incompatability, file scanning, Adobe Bridge, bad privacy policy, bloated install, useless launcher, DRM, and use of AI offends me.
You can theme it to change icons and sizes and such, which helps a little. But I agree, the interface is a nightmare. Ever since v3 came out, my layers window has disappeared and I can't find it. That's a kind of important panel to hide away :(
It tends to be pretty straightforward about what an alternative can and can't do. The tags work well for searching so you can exclude paid or freemium apps.
Gimp 3 is actually a massive improvement and they are releasing updates on a routine basis now. Try Photogimp if you like a more standard interface and layout
That tracks. I'm just tired of hearing the Gimpstans glorify it as the next replacement for Photoshop. Like, no bro, it didn't happen in 20 years it ain't happening now either.
People who promote gimp likely never actually tried to use that piece of shit. Try Krita instead, holy fuck is it so much better as a useable piece of art software.
OpenShot is also a remarkably capable and easy-to-use video editor - https://www.openshot.org/ . I use it almost daily for editing screen capture videos.
As someone who loves linux and FOSS some of these are far from being replacements and some of these are even upgrades. It does depend on one's usage though. Like I couldn't tell a Photoshop power user that gimp is a full replacement. I could say though that blender is an upgrade from cinema 4D.
That sucks. They had a really solid foundation going. The few times I used it it did crash when I put it under stress, but the UI was respectable and the tools I used were functional.
How good is DaVinci Resolve on Linux? I have been wanting to switch for a long time now, but I read online that DaVinci doesn’t work that well on Linux, so has it gotten better?
It works best with NVIDIA drivers and with the least workarounds in RHEL type distros (officially it supports Rocky Linux).
Decoding and encoding is really limited, especially in the free version. There's details about codec support in their website.
If you pay for it, and you're already used to distros like Fedora, Rocky, RHEL it pretty much works out of the box. Only Fedora requites some tinkering. There's also tools and workarounds for distros like Arch AFAIK.
130 Comments
lime@feddit.nu · 112 pts · 30d
figma is not free software, and neither is davinci resolve. use penpot and kdenlive.
jqubed@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 30d
Free as in beer, not as in speech, and DaVinci Resolve at least has a $295 upgrade for additional features, although last time I looked that upgrade is included with certain hardware purchases from Blackmagic.
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social · 14 pts · 30d
Yea it's not free but it's a once off, keep for ever price.
I'm happy with that
jqubed@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 30d
I still like the traditional model for paid software where you pay once, and then future major upgrades can be purchased for a discount; it seems like a fair way for the developer to support continued development while allowing the customer to decide if they prefer to stay on an older version.
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social · 3 pts · 29d
Yea I'm completely stepping away from all subscriptions.
The only subscriptions I will pay for is for things like Email etc.
As the person offering the service needs to keep their servers running etc.
rue@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 29d
I’ve been pretty happy with kdenlive myself.
cmhe@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Dookieman12@piefed.social · 59 pts · 30d
Idk about the rest of the software on this list, but presenting gimp as an "alternative" to photoshop seems disingenuous to me.
Gimp is an alternative to photoshop in the same way that a 56K modem is an alternative to a 1 gig fiber line. Yes, they technically do the same job. But to suggest that your experience is going to be comparable to photoshop is a stretch.
ServantOfRa@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 37 pts · 30d
I'd suggest Krita before Gimp, and even Affinity (although I'm sure there's a gotcha coming with that one)
Blackfeathr@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 30d
I've been using Photoshop for 24 years and I gave Affinity a try. Affinity still has a lot of kinks to work out. Cross compatibility wrt brushes and tools is spotty at best, unusable at worst. UI and workflow/workspace definitely needs improvement. No right click to adjust brush size and no saveable workspace option was a dealbreaker for me.
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social · 1 pts · 30d
But is Gimp Affinity's Gimp? Or is there competition there?
Fmstrat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Krita is the way to go. Even has AI retouching add-on if you're into that.
balderdash9@lemmy.zip · 21 pts · 30d
GIMP is also a massive pain in the ass. Paint.net is the one piece of software I still miss after moving to Linux.
Da Vinci Resolve is great though. Crazy that it's free and Linux compatible.
missing_string@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
I'm switching to Linux right now and I haven't really looked into replacements for each piece of software. Used Paint.net for at least 10 years, tried Gimp first but didn't like it. What do you use?
balderdash9@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 29d
Try Pinta. Unless you do digital painting/illustration, then go for Krita.
chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 30d
Photopea is pretty good for casual use
Robotunicorn@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
Same with Inkscape IMO. Anyone have a different alternative?
LwL@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Dunno how advanced its vector graphics features are, but krita does support making them at least, you could try that. The overall interface is good at least.
Krusty@quokk.au · 4 pts · 30d
Gimpshop i think it's called at least tries to make the GIMP workflow and UX (including keyboard short cuts) not completely, well, gimped.
chunes@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
The image doesn't say it's a replacement, it says it's an alternative. What piece of sofware would you suggest instead?
kibblebits@quokk.au · -3 pts · 30d
Yeah GIMP is shit. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they’re talking about. Inkscape is better than gimp but still suffers from UI issues.
revelrous@sopuli.xyz · 15 pts · 30d
Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.
kibblebits@quokk.au · -7 pts · 30d
Quality features often confuse people.
revelrous@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 30d
Nah, pretty sure it was the ai jammed in everything.
kibblebits@quokk.au · -9 pts · 30d
So then you admit that pre-AI Photoshop was significantly better than gimp. Thanks
revelrous@sopuli.xyz · 8 pts · 30d
Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?
kibblebits@quokk.au · -11 pts · 30d
I wouldn’t actually know. I don’t use Adobe Products.
But if you exclude the AI features, and don’t make “anti-ai” your entire personality, gimp is pretty shit
Krusty@quokk.au · 1 pts · 30d
The GUI/UX is shit. If you wanna design automated workflows from the shell, it can be quite flexible and powerful.
Like they used to have a website that would generate tags or like styled text. They used GIMP for the backend image generation. I thought that was a pretty impressive use case.
kibblebits@quokk.au · 1 pts · 30d
Imagemagick.
Zarobi@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 30d
I'm pretty sure GIMP doesn't have any kind of UI or UX contributors… it's all "programmer design", where finding the rectangle select tool takes 5 minutes and it doesn't work the way you want it to
massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 34 pts · 30d
Figma? No, I won't fall for that again!
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 30d
"Not much, what's figma with you?"
xkbx@startrek.website · 8 pts · 30d
It’s figmover
socsa@piefed.social · 2 pts · 30d
You know, just hanging with Candice
Dryad@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 30d
Try PenPot instead.
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 30d
How good is it in comparison, feature wise?
Dryad@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
Maybe a version or two behind on extra stuff, but core features And workflow are very similar.
sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works · 33 pts · 30d
Figma ballz
daychilde@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 30d
Not much what's updog with you?
BreadOven@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
What's up dog?
daychilde@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 30d
Gimp is apparently great if you start with it, but it is not a substitute for Photoshop.
Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 29d
Krita had been great for most of my work.
VitoRobles@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 29d
Photopea. It's not open-source but it's "freemium". It's like a web Photoshop.
chunes@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
Can confirm. Never used photoshop, Gimp seems fine to me.
vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 19 pts · 29d
Pretty sure neither Figma or Resolve are free software.
chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 29d
Davinci Resolve has a free version that is missing some features. They are important features, mind. But it definitely allows you to edit videos and get a good feel for the software to see if you want to purchase it or you can just keep using the free version even.
So it's free*.
And the paid version is buy once and get a perpetual license. Very non-scummy for a full professional video editing tool.
KneeTitts@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
On linux I just use Blender for video editing, it does about 95% of what I need
vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 29d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software
lps2@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 29d
A better, free-er alternative to figma would be something like Penpot which works pretty well and is easy to self-host.
Sunrosa@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
Kdenlive is quite good and foss
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 18 pts · 30d
Surely there's something better than Gimp.
Nefara@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 30d
Krita, definitely, though it's still not as complete in capability it's a much better analogue
thal3s@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 30d
Seconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 11d
how exactly do you do image editing in krita?
black0ut@pawb.social · 4 pts · 29d
Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
lyrial@anarchist.nexus · 0 pts · 29d
Except easily drawing circles on GIMP's part.
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 29d
black0ut@pawb.social · 1 pts · 29d
Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can't be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?
To be honest, I don't know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it's not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven't really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.
Zwiebel@feddit.org · 3 pts · 30d
Isn't krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 30d
yes they are two different use cases.
iocase@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 30d
Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist's first time seeing a platypus and assuming it's an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn't software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!
TrapRag@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 30d
Don't forget about FreeCad!
They had an update earlier this year that really closed the gap on a lot of features and tools they were missing compared to other more established cad packages.
AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 29d
Yeah its insane, i actually feel like im using fully fledged 3d mechanical modelling software now.
chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 29d
I like Freecad. I use it because it's FOSS. But it's not as easy to use, sadly.
myotheraccount@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 29d
Figma is NOT free software. It is proprietary, and hosted.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 29d
Resolve is also proprietary.
Evotech@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 29d
It said free. Not open source
Spezi@feddit.org · 2 pts · 29d
Difference beeing, you can download resolve onto your pc and use it forever without updating, even if they decide to cancel the free version or get bankrupt. Figma runs entirely web based and if Adobe buys it it can be killed off at any point.
threeganzi@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 29d
Penpot is a better option here.
CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 29d
Blender is an alternative to 3DS Max in the same way an actual car is an alternative to flintstoning a burnt out wreck. Even in college a lot of our very basic rendering exercises with Max got the whole grade just on demonstrating correct setup because the software is so prone to crashing or taking 20h to do what most alternatives (paid or free) can do in 20 minutes.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
You're saying Blender is better? I've only used Blender, but I would believe it. It's like opposite of how I feel about GIMP.
CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Yeh, admittedly I have a lot more experience with blender than 3DS Max, but from performance differences alone I'm pretty sure if Max released today without its massive pre-existing industry adoption it would be laughed out of the room.
nullspace@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 29d
You couldn't pay me to use Gimp. The interface offends me.
Sophocles@infosec.pub · 14 pts · 29d
You couldn't pay me to use Adobe. The predatory pricing, required internet, Linux incompatability, file scanning, Adobe Bridge, bad privacy policy, bloated install, useless launcher, DRM, and use of AI offends me.
madthumbs@lemmy.world · -25 pts · 29d
Techphobic, nonprofessional opinion.
Sophocles@infosec.pub · 9 pts · 29d
Lol the funniest part is I have a dual Bachelor's in CS and Graphic Design, and can spell technophobic correctly
madthumbs@lemmy.world · -17 pts · 29d
can you spell inferiority complex?
Kite@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 29d
You can theme it to change icons and sizes and such, which helps a little. But I agree, the interface is a nightmare. Ever since v3 came out, my layers window has disappeared and I can't find it. That's a kind of important panel to hide away :(
revelrous@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 29d
Try either crtl +L or from the top menu Windows > dockable dialogs > Layers
KneeTitts@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
Try Photogimp
iocase@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 30d
I use this site a lot
It tends to be pretty straightforward about what an alternative can and can't do. The tags work well for searching so you can exclude paid or freemium apps.
TheFonz@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 29d
Please... Let Gimp die already.. Krita is actually made by humans for humans
KneeTitts@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 29d
Gimp 3 is actually a massive improvement and they are releasing updates on a routine basis now. Try Photogimp if you like a more standard interface and layout
TheFonz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
I saw it. It was... Ok
Tattorack@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 29d
Well..... For quick text insertion, meme creation, or some very basic photo editing I still boot up Gimp.
But yeah... The newest version of Gimp feels like they updated from a very out dated version to a mostly out dated version.
TheFonz@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 19d
That tracks. I'm just tired of hearing the Gimpstans glorify it as the next replacement for Photoshop. Like, no bro, it didn't happen in 20 years it ain't happening now either.
Tiral@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
Yeah....GIMP is kinda shit. It's probably the one app I'd pay Adobe for to not use GIMP.
MrRandom@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 29d
lol, I feel you,
you should try Affinity Studio. It's Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign in one
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 30d
Important one:
Adobe acrobat: fork to the eyes. (Jokes aside, I'm using Stirling pdf viewer right now, it's nice)
PieMePlenty@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 29d
I need a Lightroom alternative, on linux.
Edit: Looks like rawtherapee is a good one. Funky name though...
indigo11@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 29d
Darktable is what you are looking for.
captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
Never really used Lightroom, only looked at the interface once or twice. But I think Digikam could be an alternative to replace it.
cosmos8188@leminal.space · 4 pts · 29d
Its always the Linux app names.. Surprised Klitoris doesn't exist yet.
lemmelemmy@feddit.org · 2 pts · 29d
I’m also in search for a light room replacement but heard dark table has better raw processing.
Also another q: can rawtherapee can catalogue videos?
glitchdx@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 29d
People who promote gimp likely never actually tried to use that piece of shit. Try Krita instead, holy fuck is it so much better as a useable piece of art software.
Reality@feddit.org · 12 pts · 29d
Krita is not a replacement for Photoshop though. There is a difference between a software to draw and a software for image manipulation.
glitchdx@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 29d
by the same logic, neither is gimp.
Goforce5@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
I learned Photoshop in high school, then tried to use Gimp in college. What a fucking disaster of a program.
huppakee@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 30d
This year i first saw an ad for Photoshop, i see this as a sign of them losing. Keep up the good work folk!
dparticiple@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 30d
OpenShot is also a remarkably capable and easy-to-use video editor - https://www.openshot.org/ . I use it almost daily for editing screen capture videos.
tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 30d
https://rawtherapee.com/
edit: RAW image editing
Maven@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 30d
Wow that was a RISKY click based on that URL
als@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 30d
Not a good product name 😬
richardisaguy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 30d
This image is crusty
chepdamona@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 29d
Any one else looked into Graphite? I first found it as a vector editor, but it seems to have widened its scope a fair bit
Zephyr@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 29d
As someone who loves linux and FOSS some of these are far from being replacements and some of these are even upgrades. It does depend on one's usage though. Like I couldn't tell a Photoshop power user that gimp is a full replacement. I could say though that blender is an upgrade from cinema 4D.
sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io · 3 pts · 29d
riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 29d
More people know Premier, but Natron is designed as a clone to the foundry's Nuke.
A better photoshop alternative is photopea. Gimp is it's own mess.
Tattorack@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
Can you download and install Photopea or does it still require a Web browser and an online connection to run?
Bluefruit@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
No official version that ive seen, but it seems some people have made offline versions.
Here's a flatpak: https://flathub.org/en/apps/com.github.vikdevelop.photopea_app
Uses an electron wrapper according to the page. I have not used this personally so can't say if it works well or not.
Adderbox76@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 29d
It's been a while since I paid attention to it, but last I heard Natron wasn't maintained anymore since it was having trouble getting developers.
riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 28d
That sucks. They had a really solid foundation going. The few times I used it it did crash when I put it under stress, but the UI was respectable and the tools I used were functional.
MrRandom@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 29d
Affinity Studio should be added, not FOSS but free. I t has a polished UI
Spezi@feddit.org · 4 pts · 29d
I don’t speak polish though
GraniteM@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
revelrous@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 30d
Is there anything to sort of replace InDesign? I am doing cruel, time consuming, and unspeakable things with latex atm.
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social · 8 pts · 30d
Isn't that the best way to spend time with latex, though? .. oh. oh wait, you don't mean bdsm...
revelrous@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 30d
honestly, it does not feel dissimilar.
chris@l.roofo.cc · 1 pts · 30d
There is Libre office draw and scribus that I know of.
mlg@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
Anyone have the one where it's all vim lol?
colderr@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
How good is DaVinci Resolve on Linux? I have been wanting to switch for a long time now, but I read online that DaVinci doesn’t work that well on Linux, so has it gotten better?
_donnadie_@feddit.cl · 3 pts · 29d
It works best with NVIDIA drivers and with the least workarounds in RHEL type distros (officially it supports Rocky Linux).
Decoding and encoding is really limited, especially in the free version. There's details about codec support in their website.
If you pay for it, and you're already used to distros like Fedora, Rocky, RHEL it pretty much works out of the box. Only Fedora requites some tinkering. There's also tools and workarounds for distros like Arch AFAIK.
Eggman@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 29d
On the paid version there should be no problem with codec.
_donnadie_@feddit.cl · 2 pts · 29d
Yes, but there are limitations depending on hardware. Intel and AND don't get the best encoding and decoding performance.
Evotech@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
Worked fine for me when u used it the other day to make a quick video. Cachyos amd card
Depends on what you use it for i guess
colderr@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Have to try it out some time
espurr@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 27d
Gimp instead of Krita???????????????????
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 11d
who the fuck does image editing in krita?
espurr@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 11d
It's basically photoshop...