Nobody is having that conversation because of a comment Trump made. Literally no change to gun rights is being proposed or even suggested. People are drawing unfounded policy conclusions from nothing.
It's about the feeling of safety. I mean could you imagine how terrifying it must feel just walking around a school, dragging a kicking and screaming 10 year old out and think to yourself... what if one of these kids has a gun and starts shooting! We all see it on the news every day... but it's so much easier to watch when it's just little kids trying to get about their day getting shot. It hits so much harder when it's 30 year old trained gunmen that might have to face being in the line of fire.
Or walking down the street just minding your business spraying pepper spray in peoples faces, and think to yourself, what if someone in this crowd has a gun. I'm only wearing 3 layers of body armor, and I've only got 15 friends around also armed with large assault rifles, gas masks, and tear gas to protect myself, maybe one person in this crowd, might have a weapon somewhere, and might even think about using it.
Or imagine the fear they feel every time they burst down someones door, with only 10 other soldiers, and a mere inches of riot shield in front of them to protect them from these people that have a small chance of owning a firearm somewhere in the house, these brave souls need protection!
I can't imagine what it's like to live in that kind of fear.
Him and bondi were on camera at the start of this term with Bondi telling him that somebody charged with a crime, fed or state, the feds would come in and take their guns and even if they were found not guilty later the feds would decide whether they wanted to give the guns back or not. And the president was like huh okay.
I think this is more intended to remove the citizen population's ability to retaliate against a tyrannical government. You know the thing the second amendment was intended for, according to some folks.
A lot of good regulation only happened after the privileged started complaining/suffering. It is what it is. I would take it, but I don't think it will happen with this "administration".
I bet Ed cameras in the you build in Texas Why that so-called law-enforcement was standing around while all those kids were getting murdered I’m sure they have video of it, but I also remember them editing out the audio of the video because of the screaming in the background why the agents were Standing around on their cells
If you don't understand the different reaction between something reported to have happened and something documented with multiple videos you don't understand humans much.
I've always said all legislators should be required to walk through the aftermath of an event like sandy Hook or Uvalde before they are allowed to vote on gun legislation. And while I understand why parents would never want video of that made available to the public, I also think it would make a huge difference in public opinion if it was--that's why I say at least the lawmakers should have to see it (and sight isn't the only sense of it they'd never forget).
I have no doubt of any of that. They wont make it public and all the reasons they use will never be their reason. They don't want us to see how they failed. That a exonerated coward stood by while it was happening and broke his oath doing so. That none of of the law enforcement on site had the courage to go in and end it. If that video would have been made public though it would have not changed the politicians that much. Far too many of them lack the ability to feel the pain of others. Its how they got to where they are.
No, you're a troll, because he's not suggesting they disarm the entity that was murdering people. He wants to disarm the people who are getting murdered.
It's not the video causing him to make this statement.
California's strict gun control started with Reagan because he wanted to disarm the Black Panthers. Republicans are pro 2A, as long as it is reserved for white conservative/fascist people.
EDIT: Governor Reagan. So, before he became president, but 100 fold once he got shot.
They are clearly trying to ensure that they will never be subject to a legitimate election again. Minnesota is a test for how many constitutional amendments they can break. Presidential term limits are absolutely the target. When the oligarchs no longer need their cult they will repeal the entire Constitution. Welcome to the New Confederacy.
Trump is nearing his life's term limit. A 3rd term from him personally is not particularly concerning. That's still a red line in the sand that we should never allow anyone to cross but I'll be surprised if he makes it through his current term in good enough condition to even pretend to be in charge.
Trump is just a symptom. The christofascists in his ear are the sickness. Trump is there just to bulldoze through the Constitution and establish a one party system.
Another will replace him. Not vance either, not for long. If you I think everything goes back to normal after this President is out you are quite mistaken.
Trump is the face. The oligarchs are the movement. What we are dealing with is a long festering tumor that has metastasized. Trump is the irregular shaped mole on the surface. The cancer has been there since the civil war.
I agree that the success of Trumpism has been due to his personality cult and nothing else. But they are basing their power more and more on open violence, terror and propaganda. It is very well possible that they manage to consolidate this rule of fear before Trump becomes unfeasible.
Maybe not, but what I see is more ideologically in line with the Confederates than with the Nazis. That was the secret sauce the whole time. They want the entire US government to be reset to the antebellum era and to pick up as though Lincoln never existed.
So let's see, no Epstein Files, America First is out the window, prices keep rising, and now we're going to restrict the 2nd Amendment.
What exactly is MAGA in for now? The voracious Corruption? The virtuosic incompetence? The Pedophilia? Death Squads spontaneously forming firing squads and executing American citizens in the streets?
Does this look like the kind of freedom you were voting for?
Nvidia is owned in part now by the USA. It's already there. Except he's jumping straight into a corrupt socialist state where the people see nothing and the government takes everything.
At this point it is just to aggravate the left side and direct attention away from the main issue, which is ICE murdering people. MAGA at this point only cares that they remain in power and they dismantle the liberal state. Everything else is chatter.
The best time to get the files was years ago, when Dems held power. The files are heavily redacted and useless now. You'd think the Dems would've used the files as ammo, but I guess that's a GOP strat.
It probably will happen, I'm pretty sure Hitler labeled people against him as having a mental disorder and used that as a further excuse to arrest. Can't find much about it now because anything entered into google even hinting at mental disorder and Hitler or Third Reich comes up with articles questioning Hitler's sanity.
Anyway, Its how they control and dehumanize, just say you're not mentality fit because you're against dear leader.
Actually, no. The NSDAP emptied and closed the psychiatric wards by killing "unworthy lives", so they did not have the opportunity to use them against political enemies. The Soviets did this a lot, though - not accepting the "scientifically proven reality of Marxism" was often considered to be paranoid.
I too learned that lesson.
Some senator proposed a bill that would make Trump Derangement Syndrome a mental illness - from there it's only a small step to apply it to gun regulation.
And they are declaring everyone actively opposing them "domestic terrorist". Domestic terrorism qualifies as a qun restriction, too. They will propably soon throw in an affirmation of Trumpism as proof of reliability, too.
"Don't Tread On Me" bros warming up, stretching, hydrating, preparing to stoop the lowest they have ever stooped to lick Trump's boots as he ramps up his attacks on the Second Amendment
Whaaaaaaaat! The guy who said "Take the guns first, go through due process second" is suggesting they take your guns? Its almost like he says what he is going to do before he does it, Im sure absolutely no one saw this coming.
Now I really wonder how maga will react... This is one of their core beliefs and either cheeto goes full "rules for thee but not for mer" for the white christians, or he might literally find himself without a base at all
Maga core beliefs go out the window the minute trump says something different. Remember how they were against miltary intervention in foreign countries, especially in the middle east? Well now they're gung-ho for it. They're singing that Barbara Ann/bomnb Iran song on the conservative forums right now. There's a little grumbling from a few of them about trump and minions saying you can't take your guns to protests, but most are already rationalizing it (because it's the 'libtards' getting shot for it). Pretty soon they'll all be cheering on the Big Beautiful Gun Roundup.
He doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time and this time he didn't realize the camera's were on, or his honest feelings came out.
New yorkers have always known trump is a POS and will change his opinion to whatever gets him money and power. We all know he used to be a democrat, but changed to republican because the democrats hated him and knew he is a POS.
110 Comments
bfg9k@lemmy.world · 227 pts · 198d
Oh NOW it's a conversation they're willing to have. Not after 20 years of school shootings.
Fucking hypocrite cunts.
tidderuuf@lemmy.world · 59 pts · 198d
The NRA and gun rights groups have condemned Trump's rhetoric.
Seems like it's just the UltraMAGA typical bootlickers that are rolling over for Trump.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 32 pts · 198d
Anything that fractures the republican base is a plus
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 197d
We're almost at 30. Columbine was 99.
Cruel@programming.dev · 1 pts · 197d
Nobody is having that conversation because of a comment Trump made. Literally no change to gun rights is being proposed or even suggested. People are drawing unfounded policy conclusions from nothing.
devolution@lemmy.world · 134 pts · 198d
Hahaha children are shot in the face. Who cares. A white man packing a concealed weapon is murdered by ICE. Oh noes we must have gun control!
Get the fuck out of here.
Edit: I'm laughing incredulously because the situation is so fucked.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 50 pts · 198d
And that white man didnt even USE his gun. So fucking funny.
TheFogan@programming.dev · 26 pts · 198d
It's about the feeling of safety. I mean could you imagine how terrifying it must feel just walking around a school, dragging a kicking and screaming 10 year old out and think to yourself... what if one of these kids has a gun and starts shooting! We all see it on the news every day... but it's so much easier to watch when it's just little kids trying to get about their day getting shot. It hits so much harder when it's 30 year old trained gunmen that might have to face being in the line of fire.
Or walking down the street just minding your business spraying pepper spray in peoples faces, and think to yourself, what if someone in this crowd has a gun. I'm only wearing 3 layers of body armor, and I've only got 15 friends around also armed with large assault rifles, gas masks, and tear gas to protect myself, maybe one person in this crowd, might have a weapon somewhere, and might even think about using it.
Or imagine the fear they feel every time they burst down someones door, with only 10 other soldiers, and a mere inches of riot shield in front of them to protect them from these people that have a small chance of owning a firearm somewhere in the house, these brave souls need protection!
I can't imagine what it's like to live in that kind of fear.
Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 198d
I think Uvalde answered that for us.
ZeroPoke@fedia.io · 16 pts · 198d
This isnt new from him. He said take the guns back in like 2018 "Take the guns first, go through due process second"
https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-donald-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/4717030
2A still voted for him tho shrugs Something something libs take our guns.
hector@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 197d
Him and bondi were on camera at the start of this term with Bondi telling him that somebody charged with a crime, fed or state, the feds would come in and take their guns and even if they were found not guilty later the feds would decide whether they wanted to give the guns back or not. And the president was like huh okay.
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 198d
A wise man knows that you can still finish the race by walking backwards
iz_ok@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 198d
I think this is more intended to remove the citizen population's ability to retaliate against a tyrannical government. You know the thing the second amendment was intended for, according to some folks.
devolution@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 198d
It's almost like he is intentionally removing the ten bills of rights.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org · 9 pts · 198d
A lot of good regulation only happened after the privileged started complaining/suffering. It is what it is. I would take it, but I don't think it will happen with this "administration".
MehBlah@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 198d
Was kid getting shot in the face in public caught on video from three separate angles?
RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d
I bet Ed cameras in the you build in Texas Why that so-called law-enforcement was standing around while all those kids were getting murdered I’m sure they have video of it, but I also remember them editing out the audio of the video because of the screaming in the background why the agents were Standing around on their cells
MehBlah@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 198d
So not public and not all over the net.
devolution@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 198d
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 197d
If you don't understand the different reaction between something reported to have happened and something documented with multiple videos you don't understand humans much.
leadore@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 197d
I've always said all legislators should be required to walk through the aftermath of an event like sandy Hook or Uvalde before they are allowed to vote on gun legislation. And while I understand why parents would never want video of that made available to the public, I also think it would make a huge difference in public opinion if it was--that's why I say at least the lawmakers should have to see it (and sight isn't the only sense of it they'd never forget).
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 197d
I have no doubt of any of that. They wont make it public and all the reasons they use will never be their reason. They don't want us to see how they failed. That a exonerated coward stood by while it was happening and broke his oath doing so. That none of of the law enforcement on site had the courage to go in and end it. If that video would have been made public though it would have not changed the politicians that much. Far too many of them lack the ability to feel the pain of others. Its how they got to where they are.
devolution@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 197d
No. I just don't understand trolls.
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 197d
Its not a troll. Its a genuine comment on the nature of people and where and why they focus on certain atrocities more than others.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 197d
No, you're a troll, because he's not suggesting they disarm the entity that was murdering people. He wants to disarm the people who are getting murdered.
It's not the video causing him to make this statement.
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 197d
I'm not but you can't seem to understand or comprehend what I'm saying and I have no more time to waste on any of you.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 91 pts · 198d
California's strict gun control started with Reagan because he wanted to disarm the Black Panthers. Republicans are pro 2A, as long as it is reserved for white conservative/fascist people.
EDIT: Governor Reagan. So, before he became president, but 100 fold once he got shot.
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 198d
Still relevant today:
https://youtu.be/yJqfNroFp8U
jballs@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 197d
Surprised that wasn't made today
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world · 62 pts · 198d
They are clearly trying to ensure that they will never be subject to a legitimate election again. Minnesota is a test for how many constitutional amendments they can break. Presidential term limits are absolutely the target. When the oligarchs no longer need their cult they will repeal the entire Constitution. Welcome to the New Confederacy.
krashmo@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 197d
Trump is nearing his life's term limit. A 3rd term from him personally is not particularly concerning. That's still a red line in the sand that we should never allow anyone to cross but I'll be surprised if he makes it through his current term in good enough condition to even pretend to be in charge.
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 197d
Trump is just a symptom. The christofascists in his ear are the sickness. Trump is there just to bulldoze through the Constitution and establish a one party system.
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 197d
No, Trump is the entire movement. No one else even remotely comes close. It's a personality cult.
hector@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 197d
Another will replace him. Not vance either, not for long. If you I think everything goes back to normal after this President is out you are quite mistaken.
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 196d
Trump is the face. The oligarchs are the movement. What we are dealing with is a long festering tumor that has metastasized. Trump is the irregular shaped mole on the surface. The cancer has been there since the civil war.
Kornblumenratte@feddit.org · 1 pts · 197d
I agree that the success of Trumpism has been due to his personality cult and nothing else. But they are basing their power more and more on open violence, terror and propaganda. It is very well possible that they manage to consolidate this rule of fear before Trump becomes unfeasible.
nao@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 198d
Who needs term limits when the term just doesn't end
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 198d
It wont be a confederacy.
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 198d
Maybe not, but what I see is more ideologically in line with the Confederates than with the Nazis. That was the secret sauce the whole time. They want the entire US government to be reset to the antebellum era and to pick up as though Lincoln never existed.
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 197d
Except this time they wont care much what skin pigmentation their chattel have.
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 54 pts · 198d
Will Trump be the one who solves the gun problem in the US?
Nope, because it will be, "Gun for me, not for thee."
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 49 pts · 197d
So let's see, no Epstein Files, America First is out the window, prices keep rising, and now we're going to restrict the 2nd Amendment.
What exactly is MAGA in for now? The voracious Corruption? The virtuosic incompetence? The Pedophilia? Death Squads spontaneously forming firing squads and executing American citizens in the streets?
Does this look like the kind of freedom you were voting for?
skozzii@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 197d
All that winning must be getting tiring.
nuggsy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 197d
The price of winning
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 197d
Free-dumb isn't free.
fizzle@quokk.au · 43 pts · 198d
Settle down people. This isn't what you think it is.
They're using this as an explanation of why Pretti was executed.
They're not suggesting that MAGA dickheads cant carry guns.
While irreconcilable to any thinking person. These two statements can happily co-exist in the minds of idiots.
This whole thing is "rules for thee but not for me".
very_well_lost@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 197d
I'll never forget the surprised Pikachu faces on all of those armed MAGA chuds on January 6th when one of them actually got shot.
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 197d
Yeah, and they're saying they should be restricted, moreso than they are. That's not the traditional conservative position.
They're not suggesting liberals can't carry guns either. They're saying neither should carry a gun to a protest.
It's a bizarre position.
RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 198d
Just like when gun control was brought to California when the Black Panthers open carried.
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social · 9 pts · 198d
Yep. They don't give a shit as long as we are just shooting each other. They only care when it might create a problem for the state.
Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub · -1 pts · 198d
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip · 37 pts · 197d
Remember when he told people to get over it the day after a school shooting?
But protestors getting murdered I by his this is when he calls for removing guns... From the protestors.
HermitBee@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 196d
It's nuts right? If they ban guns from protestors, what reason will they have to shoot them? What deadly weapon will they say...
Oh right, cars.
ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 23 pts · 197d
First he switched the right to pro-tariffs..
Then he switched the right to not-anti-pedophile...
Now switching it to pro-gun-control
Look, can he just hurry the fuck up and get MAGA to support socialism already? I don't feel like waiting this long
Jayjader@jlai.lu · 6 pts · 197d
I want to agree, but knowing Trump it would be a national flavor of socialism :/
unphazed@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 196d
Nvidia is owned in part now by the USA. It's already there. Except he's jumping straight into a corrupt socialist state where the people see nothing and the government takes everything.
fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org · 23 pts · 198d
shittydwarf@piefed.social · 11 pts · 198d
Well he can't do a fascism if those people are armed!
grue@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 197d
...but you repeat yourself.
BioDriver@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 197d
This is definitely a feeler. As soon as the blowback hits he’ll change topic and prevent like he never said it. Of course MAGA will forget it too
sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub · 20 pts · 197d
Auli@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 196d
What he told people to get over a school shooting. How is that talking about removing guns.
prototact@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 197d
At this point it is just to aggravate the left side and direct attention away from the main issue, which is ICE murdering people. MAGA at this point only cares that they remain in power and they dismantle the liberal state. Everything else is chatter.
WarnikOdinson@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 197d
I'd even go so far to say that ICE murdering people is a distraction from the Epstein Files.
QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 196d
The best time to get the files was years ago, when Dems held power. The files are heavily redacted and useless now. You'd think the Dems would've used the files as ammo, but I guess that's a GOP strat.
Auli@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 196d
Yah keep thinking that. The Epstein files are not the magic bullet you think they are.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 20 pts · 198d
We do need gun control. For ICE. Those criminals should not be armed.
grue@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 198d
They should not exist.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 197d
True but at bare minimum there is no justification for them to be armed.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 197d
Yeah, they're an entity designed to enforce misdemeanors offenses. This is not something that should require being armed.
notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip · 19 pts · 198d
Oh now the ‘tHeY gUn GiT yEr GuNz’ asshat cares about gun control? How long till political affiliation counts as reason to revoke gun permits?
whereIsTamara@lemmy.org · 10 pts · 198d
Well, he tried to say being against Trump is a mental disorder, so that qualifies as a gun restriction.
notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 198d
Geez I’d laugh if that wasn’t actually something that may and could happen.
paper_moon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 198d
It probably will happen, I'm pretty sure Hitler labeled people against him as having a mental disorder and used that as a further excuse to arrest. Can't find much about it now because anything entered into google even hinting at mental disorder and Hitler or Third Reich comes up with articles questioning Hitler's sanity.
Anyway, Its how they control and dehumanize, just say you're not mentality fit because you're against dear leader.
Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 198d
The Trump derangement syndrome?
Kornblumenratte@feddit.org · 1 pts · 197d
Actually, no. The NSDAP emptied and closed the psychiatric wards by killing "unworthy lives", so they did not have the opportunity to use them against political enemies. The Soviets did this a lot, though - not accepting the "scientifically proven reality of Marxism" was often considered to be paranoid.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org · 3 pts · 198d
I too learned that lesson.
Some senator proposed a bill that would make Trump Derangement Syndrome a mental illness - from there it's only a small step to apply it to gun regulation.
Kornblumenratte@feddit.org · 2 pts · 197d
And they are declaring everyone actively opposing them "domestic terrorist". Domestic terrorism qualifies as a qun restriction, too. They will propably soon throw in an affirmation of Trumpism as proof of reliability, too.
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 198d
From the guy that defended Rittenhouse’s gun as a tool of “self defense.”
in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social · 18 pts · 198d
https://theshovel.com.au/2020/06/04/nra-accidentally-forgets-to-rise-up-against-tyrannical-government/
Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 197d
"PLEASE TREAD ON ME"
GardenGeek@europe.pub · 9 pts · 197d
This will most probably will be 'limited' gun control. Limited as in 'everyone left oft the GOP is a domestic terrorist'.
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 197d
Didn't Hitler do something like that?
MoonRaven@feddit.nl · 13 pts · 197d
But obviously not for registered Republicans.
hanrahan@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 197d
This
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 197d
Well you know it's not ALL registered Republicans. Jim probably has the details.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 13 pts · 198d
Best part of this article.
CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 197d
Republicans with the mask off
SarcasticMan@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 198d
Whaaaaaaaat! The guy who said "Take the guns first, go through due process second" is suggesting they take your guns? Its almost like he says what he is going to do before he does it, Im sure absolutely no one saw this coming.
thatradomguy@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 197d
Hey guys, I think I heard dingo here say he wants the Epstein files released in full. Let's do him that favor. Long overdo.
Lasherz12@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 198d
I appreciate being right every single time I talk to conservatives about the future.
Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'
Even their most furious topic boils down entirely to projection.
Unfortunately every time I'm right it's because I have no fucking faith in this nation at all.
PattyMcB@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 198d
From my cold dead hands, you fat fuck!
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 197d
Now I really wonder how maga will react... This is one of their core beliefs and either cheeto goes full "rules for thee but not for mer" for the white christians, or he might literally find himself without a base at all
leadore@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 197d
Maga core beliefs go out the window the minute trump says something different. Remember how they were against miltary intervention in foreign countries, especially in the middle east? Well now they're gung-ho for it. They're singing that Barbara Ann/bomnb Iran song on the conservative forums right now. There's a little grumbling from a few of them about trump and minions saying you can't take your guns to protests, but most are already rationalizing it (because it's the 'libtards' getting shot for it). Pretty soon they'll all be cheering on the Big Beautiful Gun Roundup.
Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub · 4 pts · 198d
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 197d
Trump will betray literally everyone who trusts him.
vpol@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 198d
He took your rights. Now he’s going to take your guns. So you couldn’t take your rights back.
RaoulDook@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 198d
Not taking shit from me. I exercise my rights whether they think they allow it or not.
TomMasz@piefed.social · 3 pts · 198d
You'll have to be a registered Republican to own guns. Which wouldn't be all that much of a change, really.
DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d
Here go the NRA idiots who thought Trump keeping quiet over the subject meant he gave a shit about their cause. A surprisingly large number of them.
Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 198d
from "automatic rifles is ok" to abolishing "this right shall not be infringed".
Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io · 2 pts · 198d
What a absolutely tiny minded little putz.
Smaile@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 196d
hes getting spooked out....
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 198d
What do you expect? People are treating the (white people) streets like they are a god damned kindergarten class. Something has to change!
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 197d
He really is trying to make enemies of everyone heh. Those guys get mad enough, he may yet find himself perforated
Foni@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 198d
I expected it, but not so soon, to be honest.
Bristlecone@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 197d
besmtt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 198d
https://youtu.be/du4xz6Lndxk?t=41s
LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 196d
He doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time and this time he didn't realize the camera's were on, or his honest feelings came out.
New yorkers have always known trump is a POS and will change his opinion to whatever gets him money and power. We all know he used to be a democrat, but changed to republican because the democrats hated him and knew he is a POS.
Xella@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 196d
LMAOOOO!!!!!
Raiderkev@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 198d
I would not at all be surprised if these killings and subsequent lies are the result of this plan.
Email from Roger Stone to Trump :
https://imgur.com/UAfzX4s
No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org · 1 pts · 198d
Fake.
They do enough facist shit there is no point in making stuff up
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/fact-check-roger-stone-didnt-221800471.html?guccounter=1
Raiderkev@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 198d
Roger Stone staunchly denying something is pretty much confirmation that it's real.
mercano@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 198d
He’s right, but for all the wrong reasons.