Who'd have thought that warrant-less mass surveillance that treats every citizen like a potential criminal would eventually hit a tipping point where people began to fight back against it?
The whole point of warrantless mass surveillance where you collect a person's entire life history from birth to death is to be able to go back through that history at any point they become an inconvenient person, whether because they are protesting or are a whistleblower or anything else that endangers the existing power structures. They can and will use your history to fabricate a "reasonable" narrative to turn you into whatever type of criminal they claim you are.
This is exactly why they're pushing the "antifa is an organized terrorist organization" so hard.
"You'd have anxiety too if you knew that entire government organizations were dedicated to watching your every move while everyone told you that you were crazy."
I watched a video last night. Some guy was banned from a casino. All they had was a blurry surveillance camera photo of him.
The AI tagged some other guy as him. Cops came and arrested him. Said the man's ID must be fake, or he used a fake ID last time because there's no way their high-fallutin AI could be wrong! It was >99% certain!
What’s funny is someone at flock is likely seeing this as a business opportunity. “With flock+ we will detect downed cameras and send a technician out to replace them instantly. Subscribe now!”
Meanwhile, municipalities are less than thrilled about defending throwing money at something literally no taxpayer wants.
This problem might solve itself really. Let the buisness majors sell the hangman their own nooses.
Sadly some people do want flock cameras because they think it's worth it to have a better chance of catching criminals even if our personal liberties get taken away. It's the age old freedom vs safety discussion.
I agree that the more popular opinion is changing to more freedom, but most of the older millennials and above that I talk to care more about catching criminals because they are more likely to be influenced by Facebook/Nextdoor posts and the mainstream media.
The thing is though you could have both, at least to a degree. You could have much more transparent policing, the cameras could do processing purely locally and based on publicly accessible lists with listed reasons for why the given plates are captured, you could make it so that the only ones who do get the data are actually thr police and not thr company selling the cameras, etc.
But that's not in the interest of Flock, or even really the powers that be. The surveillance machine needs feeding, doesn't matter for what cost.
That's because they want to be the ones doing the surveilling. There's loads of disgusting threads you can find online about them discussing ways to disable or hide that their devices are recording so they can surreptitiously record others while claiming they're not. Most often filming vulnerable women.
This is such awful history; of course it works because it serves the US, but it does blow me away that otherwise well-meaning people continue to parrot it. You don’t have to be a “tankie” to stop spouting this nonsense.
You’re referring to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. That was a non-aggression treaty, not an “alliance.” The soviets would be pretty foolish to make an alliance with a country whose fascist genocidal leader, hitler, made clear the inescapable need to invade the soviet union in mein kampf.
You know who else had already made non-aggression pacts with the Nazis before that? The UK, France, Italy, Poland, Denmark, Estonia, and Latvia. You think they were “allied” with the Nazis?
Hell the Spanish civil war was a proxy war that the soviets had to pull out of to get ready for invasion (much to the ire of western anarchists forever).
No, man. The soviet position was pretty damned clear: they needed time to mobilize. You think they were mobilizing to deal with…what, Poland? Everyone knew what was happening between the Nazis and the soviets. They still weren’t ready, and got slaughtered.
Dislike the Soviet Union for other reasons. There are plenty of good ones. This is nonsense.
Get a high vis jacket over a black polo shirt with an iron-on logo, a face mask, and sunglasses. Park out of sight or bike or walk up. You could probably swap most public hardware things with mesh node guts in broad daylight. Just sayin’. This is not advice.
Vandalizing them is a misdemeanor (typically, check your local laws and also don't do crimes).
If they were all stolen, it's an easy PR 'woe is us, think of the children' win for Flock.
If there's a bunch of social media posts that are showing chopped down flock cameras just laying on the side of the road then it has better optics from the point of view of 'We don't want country-wide surveillance networks'.
Couple dead pixels from a particularly bright light might well make them unable to do their plate reading job efficiently. Might make for an interesting study.
I doubt the lenses are glass, which means the solvents in spray paint will be, effectively, impossible to clean off without damaging the lens in the process. I doubt they have a maintenance team with such finesse as opposed to one that just replaces the device, just every other US support service.
Its not unreasonable for an anti-crime camera manufacturer to expect criminals to paint cameras. It's a movie trope. But anyway, sure would be nice to see some compilation of attack attempts to see what sticks
Put a blowtorch on the end of a long stick, maybe one of those two-part sliding ones that they use for pool skimmers and stuff. Melty, blistered plastic doesn't pass light very well.
These things are usually pretty high up. The camera in my neighborhood are about 15ft / 4.5m up. When one goes down, they have to queue up for a truck to be sent out.
My closest examples are banded to existing street light poles with some ~12ga stainless hose clamps, maybe 10ft up. Private parking lot security. I'm guessing your example (like the thumbnail?) is the choice for a town police dept or housing dev that can't attach to street lights
You definitely said non-exhaustive, but yes- this is nowhere near accurate for my local area- thinks there are 5 in my town but there are dozens, at least.
ANYTHING cloud-connected - your doorbell, your security system, even all f**king post-2006 vehicles, regardless of manufacturer - are suspect.
And are highly likely to be actually spying on you.
I’ve been working with computers since 1982, on the Internet since 1988, on the Web since 1992, and in the IT industry since 1997. The proportion of average people who don’t realize how much of their stuff is exposing them, and by how much, is frankly astounding. It’s almost 100% of normies who are woefully ignorant. Even IT people who have no clue is in the majority.
And the security on this stuff that tracks you tends to be - except in rare circumstances - absolute dogshite. Sometimes it comes without any security at all, such as all devices sold having admin creds baked in, or all remote-access credentials being identical and non-user-editable.
This is why almost all of my stuff is hardlined, I have no IoT devices at all, and the wifi for my family’s devices is physically separate from everything else.
Don’t get me wrong, as IT for almost three decades I love all the new shinies. But I’m not blind, and I’m not stupid.
Much later into the career than you but honestly in the same boat. I don't fucking let any of that shit into my house, I don't use any of the big tech companies software, FOSS on everything I own and I honestly have become so disillusioned with mainline consumer tech because it's honestly mostly trash imo. The older I get the more I realize I just want a fucking laptop with a decent keyboard, decent screen and good battery life.
When the government is run by criminals, and the corporations are run by criminals, and the law enforcement are criminal, you think the rest of us should play by the rules?
If I need help I'm sure as hell not calling the cops. The cops are only useful if the situation would be improved by a crazed gunman suddenly showing up and shooting anything that moves.
There are situations, granted, where that's an improvement. But not many.
I hesitate to call the cops even for traditionally appropriate situations when someone like you who probably loves ICE too would love to call them.
I don't understand the cult around U.S. cops because its luck of the draw if you get an asshat abuser like my SO's previous step father or a cop that can actually de-escalate a situation, vs cops doing some semblance of something correct overseas.
But keep sucking people off that are drawn to abuse of power.
100 Comments
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 252 pts · 169d
Who'd have thought that warrant-less mass surveillance that treats every citizen like a potential criminal would eventually hit a tipping point where people began to fight back against it?
SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world · 84 pts · 169d
Along with it incorrectly labeling people as a criminal so cops harass innocent families
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 91 pts · 169d
That's a feature, not a bug.
The whole point of warrantless mass surveillance where you collect a person's entire life history from birth to death is to be able to go back through that history at any point they become an inconvenient person, whether because they are protesting or are a whistleblower or anything else that endangers the existing power structures. They can and will use your history to fabricate a "reasonable" narrative to turn you into whatever type of criminal they claim you are.
This is exactly why they're pushing the "antifa is an organized terrorist organization" so hard.
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 19 pts · 169d
And they wonder why people have anxiety disorders
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 30 pts · 169d
"You'd have anxiety too if you knew that entire government organizations were dedicated to watching your every move while everyone told you that you were crazy."
null@lemmy.org · 7 pts · 169d
Crazy? I was crazy once. They put me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats.
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 169d
... I died there. ... then the worms came Worms? They make me crazy!
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 169d
Where is this quote from?
Cherry@piefed.social · 1 pts · 168d
I don’t know but if feels like the Truman show as a horror.
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 169d
They don't care, they think you're weak. Show them you're not.
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 169d
No, they do not. It is by design, friend.
artyom@piefed.social · 26 pts · 169d
I watched a video last night. Some guy was banned from a casino. All they had was a blurry surveillance camera photo of him.
The AI tagged some other guy as him. Cops came and arrested him. Said the man's ID must be fake, or he used a fake ID last time because there's no way their high-fallutin AI could be wrong! It was >99% certain!
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 169d
Sounds like a blessing in disguise. Now he can't throw his money away.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 46 pts · 169d
What’s funny is someone at flock is likely seeing this as a business opportunity. “With flock+ we will detect downed cameras and send a technician out to replace them instantly. Subscribe now!”
Meanwhile, municipalities are less than thrilled about defending throwing money at something literally no taxpayer wants.
This problem might solve itself really. Let the buisness majors sell the hangman their own nooses.
privatepirate@lemmy.zip · 24 pts · 169d
Sadly some people do want flock cameras because they think it's worth it to have a better chance of catching criminals even if our personal liberties get taken away. It's the age old freedom vs safety discussion.
Kellenved@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 169d
Those who sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 169d
Maybe a year or so ago, but now those same people are starting to understand the definition of criminal is flexible.
privatepirate@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 169d
I agree that the more popular opinion is changing to more freedom, but most of the older millennials and above that I talk to care more about catching criminals because they are more likely to be influenced by Facebook/Nextdoor posts and the mainstream media.
amju_wolf@pawb.social · 4 pts · 168d
The thing is though you could have both, at least to a degree. You could have much more transparent policing, the cameras could do processing purely locally and based on publicly accessible lists with listed reasons for why the given plates are captured, you could make it so that the only ones who do get the data are actually thr police and not thr company selling the cameras, etc.
But that's not in the interest of Flock, or even really the powers that be. The surveillance machine needs feeding, doesn't matter for what cost.
privatepirate@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 168d
Yes, I agree very much with your statement. I think our lives would be much better if our government was built like an open source project lol
CatZoomies@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 169d
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 pts · 169d
That's because they want to be the ones doing the surveilling. There's loads of disgusting threads you can find online about them discussing ways to disable or hide that their devices are recording so they can surreptitiously record others while claiming they're not. Most often filming vulnerable women.
XLE@piefed.social · 132 pts · 169d
There's nothing more American than destroying a Flock camera
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 169d
I was almost gonna say something about killing nazis, but..
nah, not as american
chloroken@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 169d
Killing Nazis is a Soviet thing. In the US, we hire them for important government jobs and fold them into our culture.
Iconoclast@feddit.uk · 8 pts · 169d
Soviets were allied with nazi Germany untill they turned on them.
brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 168d
This is such awful history; of course it works because it serves the US, but it does blow me away that otherwise well-meaning people continue to parrot it. You don’t have to be a “tankie” to stop spouting this nonsense.
You’re referring to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. That was a non-aggression treaty, not an “alliance.” The soviets would be pretty foolish to make an alliance with a country whose fascist genocidal leader, hitler, made clear the inescapable need to invade the soviet union in mein kampf.
You know who else had already made non-aggression pacts with the Nazis before that? The UK, France, Italy, Poland, Denmark, Estonia, and Latvia. You think they were “allied” with the Nazis?
Hell the Spanish civil war was a proxy war that the soviets had to pull out of to get ready for invasion (much to the ire of western anarchists forever).
No, man. The soviet position was pretty damned clear: they needed time to mobilize. You think they were mobilizing to deal with…what, Poland? Everyone knew what was happening between the Nazis and the soviets. They still weren’t ready, and got slaughtered.
Dislike the Soviet Union for other reasons. There are plenty of good ones. This is nonsense.
chloroken@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 169d
fidgeting9658@lemmings.world · 6 pts · 169d
It's like American Pie or something.😎
Edit: I know it's apple.
LostSoul8765@lemmy.world · 110 pts · 169d
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 84 pts · 169d
Any RAM or storage in those things? That solar panel looks useful.
SARGE@startrek.website · 74 pts · 169d
VincentComfy@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 169d
“That I found somewhere” is funnier than usual given the context
brie_cheese@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 169d
think you miles o'brien
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 42 pts · 169d
I am tempted to snatch the solar cell for meshtastic nodes. They do look like they are high quality.
XLE@piefed.social · 11 pts · 169d
Could you replace the insides with a node?
Jimbabwe@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 169d
Get a high vis jacket over a black polo shirt with an iron-on logo, a face mask, and sunglasses. Park out of sight or bike or walk up. You could probably swap most public hardware things with mesh node guts in broad daylight. Just sayin’. This is not advice.
CADmonkey@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 169d
Looks like a small camera and IR LED's too.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world · 74 pts · 169d
Stealing them is felony grand theft.
Vandalizing them is a misdemeanor (typically, check your local laws and also don't do crimes).
If they were all stolen, it's an easy PR 'woe is us, think of the children' win for Flock.
If there's a bunch of social media posts that are showing chopped down flock cameras just laying on the side of the road then it has better optics from the point of view of 'We don't want country-wide surveillance networks'.
SaltySalamander@fedia.io · 61 pts · 169d
GOOD.
ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com · 47 pts · 169d
Couple dead pixels from a particularly bright light might well make them unable to do their plate reading job efficiently. Might make for an interesting study.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 169d
Lasers tend not to be good for camera sensors, I've heard.
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 8 pts · 169d
I think you'd need pretty high powered lasers to do sufficient damage. I think a class 3 wouldn't be enough, or so I've heard.
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 168d
So what you're saying is that I have an finally have
an excusea good reason to get a high-powered laser.Quexotic@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 168d
Via con huevos, my friend!
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 16 pts · 169d
That might actually work, but it's probably easier and safer to just use a can of spray paint
mjr@infosec.pub · 15 pts · 169d
Paint seems easier to detect and remove.
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 169d
Paint can be seen by passers by. A fried sensor can’t.
piecat@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 169d
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 169d
Then make sure they can't identify you.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 169d
I doubt the lenses are glass, which means the solvents in spray paint will be, effectively, impossible to clean off without damaging the lens in the process. I doubt they have a maintenance team with such finesse as opposed to one that just replaces the device, just every other US support service.
kent_eh@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 169d
I've suggested paint before, and several people replied that there things have coatings on the lens that resist paint and other chemical attacks.
It's almost like flock anticipated that people would be pissed off at them...
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 169d
Its not unreasonable for an anti-crime camera manufacturer to expect criminals to paint cameras. It's a movie trope. But anyway, sure would be nice to see some compilation of attack attempts to see what sticks
TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 169d
Idk about paint, but flex seal works
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 168d
Put a blowtorch on the end of a long stick, maybe one of those two-part sliding ones that they use for pool skimmers and stuff. Melty, blistered plastic doesn't pass light very well.
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
These things are usually pretty high up. The camera in my neighborhood are about 15ft / 4.5m up. When one goes down, they have to queue up for a truck to be sent out.
TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 169d
If you can climb a rope, the poles that Flock use are narrow enough to be climbed the same way
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
My closest examples are banded to existing street light poles with some ~12ga stainless hose clamps, maybe 10ft up. Private parking lot security. I'm guessing your example (like the thumbnail?) is the choice for a town police dept or housing dev that can't attach to street lights
TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 169d
Ohh, yep- I forgot about those ones! I've seen some like that around my area, but most here are on those skinny poles like shown in the thumbnail
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 169d
Deet makes plastic foggy.
etchinghillside@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 169d
Something something double tap.
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 169d
What shall we do with an angle grinder (3x) early in the morning?
RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 169d
Cut it in half and push it over (3x) early in the morning?
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 168d
Hoo-ray and down it's falling (3x) early in the morning!
toiletobserver@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d
I like your style
alonsohmtz@feddit.uk · 37 pts · 169d
Reygle@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 169d
You definitely said non-exhaustive, but yes- this is nowhere near accurate for my local area- thinks there are 5 in my town but there are dozens, at least.
LostSoul8765@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 169d
JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone · 6 pts · 168d
after
addingremoving almost 200 cameras...LostSoul8765@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 168d
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 169d
If we won’t defend our 4th Amendment rights the sold out politicians sure as hell won’t
SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 169d
Ive thought about getting a stick with a cardboard sign that says fuck flock and putting it right in front of all the cameras around me that i know of
cranakis@reddthat.com · 39 pts · 169d
Here's a map of them: https://deflock.org/
TommySoda@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 169d
Been awhile since I checked out this website and only now just found out there is a new one right next to the office I work at.
officermike@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 169d
I was quite surprised to see how many there are.
https://deflock.org/map
tidderuuf@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 169d
I could've sworn 2 weeks ago there was an article about people breaking into them to steal the wires and components.
RaoulDook@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 169d
I hear tell them cameras is full of valuable minerals like gold and copper!
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 169d
Also RAM and HDDs!
DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
I heard the Epstein files are in thar
rekabis@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 168d
ANYTHING cloud-connected - your doorbell, your security system, even all f**king post-2006 vehicles, regardless of manufacturer - are suspect.
And are highly likely to be actually spying on you.
I’ve been working with computers since 1982, on the Internet since 1988, on the Web since 1992, and in the IT industry since 1997. The proportion of average people who don’t realize how much of their stuff is exposing them, and by how much, is frankly astounding. It’s almost 100% of normies who are woefully ignorant. Even IT people who have no clue is in the majority.
And the security on this stuff that tracks you tends to be - except in rare circumstances - absolute dogshite. Sometimes it comes without any security at all, such as all devices sold having admin creds baked in, or all remote-access credentials being identical and non-user-editable.
This is why almost all of my stuff is hardlined, I have no IoT devices at all, and the wifi for my family’s devices is physically separate from everything else.
Don’t get me wrong, as IT for almost three decades I love all the new shinies. But I’m not blind, and I’m not stupid.
Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 168d
Much later into the career than you but honestly in the same boat. I don't fucking let any of that shit into my house, I don't use any of the big tech companies software, FOSS on everything I own and I honestly have become so disillusioned with mainline consumer tech because it's honestly mostly trash imo. The older I get the more I realize I just want a fucking laptop with a decent keyboard, decent screen and good battery life.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 168d
Thank god I just purchased my dream car, a 2002 Lexus. Hack that you jabronis. tape deck gang
FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 168d
PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social · 10 pts · 168d
But but but...the internet told me that Americans welcome this with open arms! /s
S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub · 8 pts · 168d
This is the Mirror's Edge type rebellion shit I would imagine myself doing when I was a kid as a future hacker. This is fucking sick as.
DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 169d
It's every American's duty as an American to do so.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 168d
Tech crunch indeed.
omnioki@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 169d
hell yeah they are 🤘
ZombieMantis@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 169d
Based.
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 168d
How did Ring avoid controversy?
calmluck9349@infosec.pub · 12 pts · 168d
Cause private citizens are doing it. Not sure why people aren't hating on them as much yet
MountainMan@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 168d
Didn't some use a 5000MW laser to fry some of them?
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 168d
Fucking gangster.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz · 5 pts · 169d
Nooooo! Not property damage noooooooooo!!!!!
boaratio@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 168d
Good.
drascus@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 168d
im glad people are fighting back. i hate these things.
Lioffproxy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d
https://deflock.org/map#map=14%2F46.868936%2F-114.012268
impdroid@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 168d
What is this and why did they put them up in the first place
Doctorbllk@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 168d
The article explains every aspect of this.
Amoxtli@thelemmy.club · -56 pts · 169d
Criminals.
4am@lemmy.zip · 48 pts · 169d
Yes. Flock are criminals.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 169d
When the government is run by criminals, and the corporations are run by criminals, and the law enforcement are criminal, you think the rest of us should play by the rules?
How is that fair or right?
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 169d
Yes the corporations violating Americans 4th amendment rights are criminals and traitors
ebolapie@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 169d
yeah, standing up for your right to privacy makes you a criminal now. You got it chief.
alonsohmtz@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 169d
Wolfram@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
On the wrong platform if you want to suck up to cops and surveillance chief
Amoxtli@thelemmy.club · -8 pts · 168d
Don't call the cops when you need help. Of course, you will.
Urist@leminal.space · 4 pts · 168d
If I need help I'm sure as hell not calling the cops. The cops are only useful if the situation would be improved by a crazed gunman suddenly showing up and shooting anything that moves.
There are situations, granted, where that's an improvement. But not many.
Wolfram@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 168d
I hesitate to call the cops even for traditionally appropriate situations when someone like you who probably loves ICE too would love to call them.
I don't understand the cult around U.S. cops because its luck of the draw if you get an asshat abuser like my SO's previous step father or a cop that can actually de-escalate a situation, vs cops doing some semblance of something correct overseas.
But keep sucking people off that are drawn to abuse of power.