Trump blasts Supreme Court for not overturning 2020 election

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-supreme-court-overturning-2020-presidential-election/

In another round of late-night social media posts, Donald Trump attacked the Supreme Court for not overturning his loss in the 2020 presidential election — and tried to pressure the court to rule his way in future election cases.

Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump, but this one was particularly alarming for its scope and the criticism it directed against the nation’s highest court, where six out of nine justices are conservatives and three are Trump appointees.

373 points · 82 comments · view on lemmy.world

82 Comments

Asafum@lemmy.world · 147 pts · 169d (10 replies)

samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 169d (5 replies)
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 169d (4 replies)

Why does this site use cookies?

samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 169d

I wondered that, too!

ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 169d (2 replies)

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Says right there... lol

tomiant@piefed.social · 7 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Oh it's to help me! No further questions then.

Septimaeus@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 169d
[ removed ]
BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca · 11 pts · 169d (3 replies)

Honestly his being alive might be a net positive at this point. Republicans have now seen how far they can push the base. Once they get a slightly more competent psychopath in place we'll be five shades more fucked than we are already

agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 169d (2 replies)

I honestly hope he lives until October 2028.

stringere@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 169d (1 reply)

July or later so criminal proceedings will harrow him for the end of his life. May he know no peace.

As it is written:
Know violence, no peace.
No violence, know peace.

agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 168d

Yeah but he's probably going to run for another term and I'm not confident he'll be prevented from doing so. I don't wanna be stuck with his VP, but I'd love to see the right scramble to try and replace him in under a month

ExtremeDullard@piefed.social · 99 pts · 169d (6 replies)

Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump

Anybody who's ever had to deal with someone with fronto-temporal dementia knows the symptoms.

joekar1990@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 169d (2 replies)

Can't wait for the Jake Tapper book to come out later on all this.

ExtremeDullard@piefed.social · 7 pts · 169d (1 reply)

I really hope Jake Tapper isn't related to Trump. He's had enough tragedies in his life.

lemmyng@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d

Considering the gobsmacking heel-turn Fake Plapper has done, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest to learn he's related to Trump.

tomiant@piefed.social · 4 pts · 169d (2 replies)

I hate how much he reminds me of my late dad. Except my dad was well read and smart. Ah shit that's not fair. My dad was generally well intentioned. But the narcissistic bullying and emotional volatility and the blaming and the gaslighting tho...

lemmyng@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Was your late dad my late dad?

tomiant@piefed.social · 2 pts · 168d

It really is a "type" isn't it? I could talk about it for a very long time. Sorry we had the same dad. Ah shit that's unfair again. He was a great dad in many respects, nowhere near Trump levels, but the behaviors man... Eerie sometimes.

ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com · 43 pts · 169d (22 replies)

There has to be some point where the congress critters decide this guy is just too unhinged to be in power, right?

ryokimball@infosec.pub · 80 pts · 169d (5 replies)

The fact that this line appears not to be crossed already is the single most damaging aspect for the US

AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 169d (2 replies)

Exactly. Can you imagine getting in the Obama tan suit days and having an administration try 1/100th of the crap this one is doing? It's amazing how trump has normalized high treason and rampant corruption.

krashmo@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 169d (1 reply)

He's just highlighting what was already true. Rich people can do what they like because they control the government and they have class solidarity.

tomiant@piefed.social · 2 pts · 169d

Worse, they control the industry and the media.

errer@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d (1 reply)

The line was absolutely crossed a few months into his first term.

Tower@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 169d

Emoluments Clause at 12:01 PM ET on January 20th, 2017.

ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one · 41 pts · 169d (3 replies)

We can excuse the sexual assault (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the racism (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the child rape (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse hating the poor (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the ableism (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the corruption (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the misogyny (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the ineptitude (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse another pointless Middle East war (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse destroying the social fabrics (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the backstabbing on long standing allies (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse dragging the country into economic turmoil (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the violations of the Constitution (in fact we encourage it)

  • Republicans
orlyowl@piefed.ca · 7 pts · 169d

Needs to be a full page spread in every major newspaper.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d

In other words, "Principled Conservatives".

Mulligrubs@lemmy.world · -11 pts · 169d

"We can excuse the sexual assault (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the racism (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the child rape (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse hating the poor (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the ableism (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the corruption (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the misogyny (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the ineptitude (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse another pointless Middle East war (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse destroying the social fabrics (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the backstabbing on long standing allies (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse dragging the country into economic turmoil (in fact we encourage it) We can excuse the violations of the Constitution (in fact we encourage it)"

Small correction: Republicans & Democrats for the last 50 years (examples are legion), BoTh PaRtIeS, no true scotsman, etc.

danc4498@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 169d (4 replies)

Problem is most of the congress has empowered Trump too much, so if they step out against him, they are going to be equally implicated.

At this point, it is ride or die for them.

Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d (2 replies)

Or both?

Both is good acceptable

danc4498@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d (1 reply)

You can’t ride and die. That’s like having your cake and eating it too.

GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d

The one can end the other. That’s acceptable.

Sassinake@mastodon.social · 2 pts · 169d

@danc4498 @ShellMonkey

more like ride for them and die for us.

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 169d

Traitors gonna treason.

frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io · 4 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Literally no, he could start dragging congress people out and shooting them dead in public and the GOP would cover him for it. Say it's too soon to discuss between rounds. Especially if he leaves the GOP for last, at which point the dead are declared RINOs and ignored.

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 168d

Susan Collins would be concerned though, you can count on that.

YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 169d

Surely that point has long passed?

daannii@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d

Right!?!

RIGHT!?!???

😞

100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it · 1 pts · 169d

If he had hired goons gut their families on live TV, maybe

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 168d

No, they don't care. They just try to make as many millions as they can and if the country descends into anarchy they can go live in Europe with their wealth and connections.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 42 pts · 169d (6 replies)

If they overturned the 2020 election would that make his current term illegal?

mcv@lemmy.zip · 38 pts · 169d (3 replies)

I think January 6 makes his current term illegal.

Rakonat@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 169d (1 reply)

His knowing collusion with Russian agents makes his first term illegal.

tomiant@piefed.social · 10 pts · 169d

His 34 felonies makes it illegal.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 6 pts · 169d

You'd think but Americans took a poll two years ago and they decided it didn't really matter much to them.

BillCheddar@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 169d (1 reply)

There is literally no mechanism by which that happens.

Practically speaking, the next President has to go through and undo all of this asshole's changes on paper, by signing new EOs and (in some cases) asking Congress for a law to sign. Most of it is administrative, so easy to undo without Congress.

We can't do anything about anyone he pardoned. They stay pardoned. Can't get around that, Constitutionally.

ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d

The fun thing about his pardonees is their general tendency to commit more crimes.

madcaesar@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 169d (1 reply)

The Supreme Court actually DID steal an election.

They stole it from Gore and gave it to another war criminal shitbag W.

In hindsight, it's insane how little the Democrats / Left complained about it... They just went like "Oh, you stole this election? Ok I'll try again in 4 years. Have a good day."

Now compare that with this orange lunatic who's screaming about an election he LOST and tried to steal.

ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 169d

There was a good bit of complaining (for whatever that was worth) and W's approval rating was in the shitter just like trump's. Along came 9/11 which was definitely just an intelligence failure even though it was the best possible thing that could have happened for Bush.

One of the many forgotten things about November 2000 was that the Supreme Court -- before its final ruling awarding the Presidency to Bush -- issued an injunction stopping the recount in Florida on the grounds that it would call into question the legitimacy of Bush's win.

PetoniousRex@lemmy.zip · 30 pts · 169d (5 replies)

He is a putrid, lice-ridden tuft of anal pubic hair that’s been transplanted atop a grimy, tattered Egyptian mummy, that’s oft mistaken for a dried-up 6 foot tall, spray-tan colored toilet brush.

human@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 169d

Is that Dickinson?

Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Yeah, but doesn't that lice-ridden toupet look good!?

tomiant@piefed.social · 2 pts · 169d

Toupee would be admitting you're bald, that's a monstruous combover. Why you think he wears that stupid baseball cap all the time.

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 168d

Anal pubic hair isn't an oxymoron?

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d

hey what did a pthirus ever do to you

ikidd@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 169d

If there were any justice, Donny, you'd get impeached in November and put up against a wall with your entire family on Christmas Day.

kmartburrito@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 169d

It's always projection with this tiny dick chucklefuck pedo. He's trying to sow some chaos so he can call on them to come in clutch when he pulls fuckery during the midterms and take a "you owe me one" approach.

SirMaple__@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 169d

Formfiller@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 169d

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 169d (1 reply)

A child trapped inside an adult's body.

No wonder conservatives identify with him.

AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 169d

Pretty sure it was Trump's body that was inside the child.

tomiant@piefed.social · 9 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Someone said it would be nice to be able to filter news for things Trump actually did than what he's said.

Soggy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 169d

Unfortunately his words have an impact.

Gullible@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Major aside, but every time I Wikipedia information about the justices, I’m struck by how young some of them look, despite being in their 70s. Wikipedia just uses 20+ year old photos, which I also rediscover every time.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 169d (9 replies)

Eventually we'll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons. Those people will be expected to return to prison to serve out their sentences, or they'll be declared fugitives, and an additional 10 years added to their sentence, no matter what the original sentence was.

the_crotch@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 169d (3 replies)

And we'll finally figure out cold fusion and faster than light travel and a unified field theory and everyone will get a pony

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 169d

I don't want a pony. I wouldn't mind a small dog or sweet kitty.

Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 169d

One megawatt clean energy for every citizen!

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d

I don't want a pony. Could I get a Batmobile?

entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf · 5 pts · 169d (3 replies)

That would require Dems to do something.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 169d (2 replies)

Yep, when the House and Senate flips in the Midterms, the new Congress will no longer be business as usual. They will get with the program, or they will suffer the consequences right along with the rest of the MAGAs. There are already a few who will have to answer for their incompetence, like the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries.

entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 169d

People keep saying this… but I just don’t see it. Maybe I’m jaded.

The masses will bitch and then kick the can down the road. They’ll feel good because 100 people gave them internet points, and they’ll go back to doing nothing.

Dems will say some stupid shit like “let’s put the past behind us and focus on a brighter future!”

They’ll bury the Epstein victims because they’re also in the files. They’ll raise taxes on the poor and middle class while extending corporate benefits.

As long as Schumer and Jeffries and the other Pelosi wannabes are in office we’re fucked.

lemmyng@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d

And John "the stroke didn't kill me but made me stupider" Fetterman.

pivot_root@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d

Eventually we'll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons.

Let me fix that for you:

Eventually he'll get his second term declared invalid, and use that as his reason for running for his third term.

MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 169d

Toys thrown from pram again. Whaaaa Whaaaa Whaaaa. (Please bail me out, it's all I know, so not my fault....)

meathorse@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d (1 reply)

Trump: why won't supreme court do something about this injustice

Also Trump: supreme court? You have no power here... I do what I want!

SayJess@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 169d

Whateva, I do what I want!

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d

PEDOnald will just never, ever get over being a gigantic loser. He'll go to his grave still pissing and moaning about the "stolen" election, the poor little snowflake.

santa@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 169d

If they validated it, I would support that if he was then immediately vacated from office, along with everything he’s done this term including appointments and lifetime confirmations, as this would be his third term.

All of this aside, I think it’s good what has happened because it means that whatever someone says doesn’t change the facts of what happened with evidence.

frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io · 1 pts · 169d

He can make this argument because those fuckers have done it in the past. Way to go, SCOTUS.

LaoiseFu@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d

Coup