A CEO told employees they won't get raises in 2026 because the budget is going to AI
https://www.businessinsider.com/teradata-pauses-raises-employee-compensation-ai-budget-2026-6
https://www.businessinsider.com/teradata-pauses-raises-employee-compensation-ai-budget-2026-6
114 Comments
devaly@ani.social · 180 pts · 62d
Time to slack off and deliver the minimum possible then
tidderuuf@lemmy.world · 113 pts · 62d
That's exactly what people should be doing anytime their company boasts about record profits/revenue yet halts pay raises or even has it lower than the rate of inflation.
In my old job I just allocated a percent of my day towards job applications until I finally got out. Morons thought I wouldn't be upset with a 15% pay cut over 3 years of working my ass off.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 74 pts · 62d
“It’s a question of motivation. If I bust my ass and Initec ships a few more units I don’t see another dime. So where’s the motivation?”
It’s insane that companies haven’t gotten this hint in the 27 years since Office Space was released.
phdepressed@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 62d
Not wanting to starve is also a great motivator. Now that you're struggling either way the motivation goes away.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 62d
“But that makes people work just hard enough that they don’t get fired”
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 62d
Not starving is the motivation.
phdepressed@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 62d
Was
badgermurphy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 60d
Flower@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 62d
They can't change the incentives without re-inventing how companies work. They're just structured in a way that gives bad incentives like that. And nobody wants to take a risk on their dime, or break the thing that makes them money, and by now it's all basically set in stone. Until the whole system breaks and new things get organized in a new system probably.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 62d
There are lots of companies that offer stock as well as monetary compensation, and things like profit sharing.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 46 pts · 62d
Quiet quit, show up a bit late, stretch your breaks by a few minutes, leave early, steal stuff, don't do anything that doesn't directly contribute to your job, volunteer for nothing, refuse to tithe to whatever their stupid charity is, max out every benefit, max out any family leave, file official complaints to HR, break stuff, don't refill anything, do no maintenance on anything, umionize, etc.
Be a paid employee, don't be a good employee. Act your wage.
timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 60d
This is so well written and spot on. Exactly what needs to be done or not done. Kudos.
ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 61d
Hahahha I'd show up to work and do jack squat all day.
devaly@ani.social · 5 pts · 62d
A percent? Those are rookie numbers
bagsy@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 61d
The CIA published a guide back in the 40s about how to disrupt fascist companies. It's worth a google.
RepublicansAreEvil@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 61d
Weird the CIA would do that I feel like lol, we're they at one point actually based?
pleb_maximus@piefed.zip · 21 pts · 61d
It's the Simple Sabotage Field Manual and was made by the Office of Strategic Services (or in short the OSS). It was dissolved after WWII, one of its short lived successors was the Central Intelligence Group, the direct predecessor of the CIA.
Although the Wiki article contains a link to the manual on a US government site already, the Internet Archive also has a pdf of it.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 61d
a fascists govt that doesnt play ball with the USA that is.
Jhex@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 62d
... while actively looking for a new job
JoeKrogan@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 62d
Also waste the ai tokens so they dont justify it to fire staff
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 62d
"The AI will handle it, that's why they make the Big Bucks."
Mac@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 61d
Less than minimum, make them spend money on firing you.
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 62d
Inflation adjusted productivity.
badgermurphy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 60d
anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 60d
And blame the LLMs for all mistakes it makes. Since the management clearly cares more about it than the employees.
bigbangdangler@reddthat.com · 136 pts · 62d
To date, I have not heard a single CEO talk about where the money will come from if no one is employed.
How can consumers consume if they don't have any money?
rozodru@piefed.world · 66 pts · 61d
that's for someone else to worry about.
Seriously if you talk to these people they live their lives financial quarter by quarter. there's no plan for 2+ years down the line, they can't think that far ahead. They're all like this. It's all about the now. make money now, release a product now, no future, no updates, now now now. This is why LLM's appeal so much to them, it can provide that "now" that they crave.
hateisreality@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 61d
When there's a 20 million dollar golden parachute when fail why would you care about the next quarter...
RepublicansAreEvil@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 61d
Exactly! In 2008 there was guys just blindly driving off the cliff huffing pure copium and greed.
h54@programming.dev · 40 pts · 62d
Because these drug and AI addled idiots refuse to or can't think more than a quarter ahead at a time. As there are no consequences for the executive caste, why should they?
IratePirate@feddit.org · 19 pts · 62d
That's what the rich dickhead bunkers in remote locations are for, my friend.
Seleni@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 61d
May as well asked who the slave owners sold to since so many in the South were enslaved.
The answer is the same. They sell to each other. We don’t get a cut. They dream of the day they actually get to have slaves again. Most of them don’t see us as people; they see us as things that siphon off money that needs to be in their pockets. Money we don’t deserve because we’re not rich.
jj4211@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 60d
Hell, they would be even happier to ignore the 'rabble' altogether. You at least had to keep the slaves vaguely alive.
There's a reason Larry Ellison said ""Citizens will be on their best behavior, because we’re constantly recording and reporting everything that is going on", they want to contain the "unwanted" and keep them from being a risk while excluding them from the 'economy' to the extent feasible
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 61d
Apparently long as bots are buying from them they care. The goal is keep the stock in green Apparently they don't need consumers for that.
lemmyng@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 61d
But what happens to the physical products that are taking up stock in warehouses?
Or are they just digitizing everything to the point where bots are buying shit to optimize their functions so they can buy more digitized product?
jj4211@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 60d
They would be happy to have a 'low volume, high value economy'. Only trinkets for them to trade among themselves at relatively high price, while they have no use for and therefore no interest in the bulk of the population. There is a reason they are very keen on surveillance and "law enforcement" because they think that might keep the rabble away from them cheaper than trying to appease the rabble.
whoisearth@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 60d
That's future CEOs problem
barkybeak@lemmy.zip · 86 pts · 62d
Saved you a click
femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 43 pts · 62d
How much of a raise will the CEO get?
uuj8za@piefed.social · 39 pts · 62d
ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 61d
This is how they get voluntary terminations that don't require severance.
bagsy@lemmy.world · 84 pts · 61d
Great way to have half your staff quiet quit, and probably make at least a couple mad enough to really fuck some shit up.
Stupid tech bros think they are entitled to hard work and loyalty, they arent, it must be earned.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 61d
Employees quitting is the goal. If they get them to quit they don't have to pay unemployment.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 61d
Quiet quitting is when you lazy it up until they fire you.
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 60d
yeah, so don't quit. just do the bare minimum and collect a paycheque. it's just treating them how they're treating you, it's fair
KeenFlame@feddit.nu · 2 pts · 60d
It's the most idiotic suicide by a planet ever
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 61d
Better to start wasting the AI tokens and burn their AI budget with nothing to show for it.
Patrikvo@lemmy.zip · 22 pts · 61d
"Here's a list of 4000 cities. can you generate the order in which to visit them. Assume trasportation by car and find the exact cheapest order."
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 61d
"Hypothetically, how far would a catapult throw a CEO?"
mangaskahn@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 61d
Assuming similar input effort, a trebuchet is more durable and efficient. Better for throwing more CEOs while consuming fewer resources.
The_v@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 60d
Hmmm... This brings up an interesting question for the physics nerds out there.
The desired termination of the CEO is the sudden stop at the end of the flight.
When using a catapult or trebuchet, excessive force exerted during launch would terminate the CEO immediately. This would deprive the CEO of his last luxury flight. .
What the the maximum distance a catapult or trebuchet can throw the CEO while achieving this result? Assume the CEO weighs 100kg's and is 165cm tall.
IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 60d
Quick search and napkin math mixed with some LLM says that at least 100m should be fine. Launch would be a bit uncomfortable at around 3g, but nothing a normal body couldn't manage. Not that long of a flight, but a flight anyways.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 60d
My napkin math results in 'further than a guillotine'.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 61d
its also called constructive dismissal.
GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 60d
Doesn't matter if they're mad or not. The company is demanding they use LLMs to vibe code their products, shit's about to be fucked even if they get on board.
very_well_lost@lemmy.world · 60 pts · 61d
The company I work for did this last year.
Unfortunately the tech industry can get away with this shit because the job market is a fucking nightmare and tech bros all think they're too smart/skilled to need a union (neither of which is true).
Danarchy@lemmy.nz · 60 pts · 61d
Another boss suffering from too much neck
Hupf@feddit.org · 5 pts · 61d
Come again?
Smaile@lemmy.ca · 36 pts · 60d
just quit on mass and save yourselves the time, it'll likely collapse the company as an added bonus
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 29 pts · 60d
The expression is "en masse". It's French for "in great quantity".
HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub · 8 pts · 60d
Americans can't do anything en masse.
bridgeburner@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 60d
Thy can, when it comes to their body weight lol
echodot@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 60d
That's more en massif
poopkins@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 60d
Eat
bless@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 60d
Could of told me sooner
luciferofastora@feddit.org · 3 pts · 60d
Son of a birch
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 60d
For all intensive purposes its the same.
Smaile@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 60d
ah
ratrace@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 60d
ratrace@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 60d
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 60d
On mass is literally en masse in English . . .
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 60d
It literally isn't. Literally, "on" doesn't translate to "en", as it literally means "in". Literally, the "masse" in French here doesn't refer to literal "mass" as in a quantity of literal matter to be literally measured, but literally an uncountable concept like a literal crowd, for example.
So, which mass are you quitting on?
And in any case, to be literally correct the expression taken from another literal language should be literally italicized.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 60d
En means like eight different things in french depending on context, so does on in english. Mass also means large numbers of people.
Everyone knew exactly what he meant because it's pretty much a word for word translation of the french expression...
But sure man, it's really important everyone knows you know the original french expression.
RunawayFixer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 60d
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/en-masse
ratrace@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 60d
ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 62d
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca · 30 pts · 60d
Sweet. Time to stop giving a shit about work, and just shit at work. (Prepositions are amazing!)
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 60d
A day without taking a shit at work is money in your boss's pocket.
lando55@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 60d
Boss makes a dollar I make a dime That's why fuck AI
P1nkman@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 60d
I'd rather fuck a person of the opposite sex, but you do you, boo.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 60d
Sludgehammer@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 62d
Oh boy... he is just chugging the AI kool-aid.
bigbangdangler@reddthat.com · 17 pts · 62d
Well yeah, doing actual research or understanding a topic would cut into his golf time
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 61d
That kind of crap is one reason I became a contractor ages ago and didn't look back.
AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 61d
OE is king.
replicat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 61d
OE?
AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 61d
Overemployed
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 25 pts · 61d
a sign that a massive layoff is coming is: not having enough foronuses/raises, or if the ceo funds themselves with the cuts.
DarkCloud@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 61d
At least the AI will be able to feed its wife and family.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 20 pts · 61d
"AI" -> "CEO's bonus", when we put it through the translator.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 60d
How this doesn't result in a class action lawsuit is beyond me.
Spineless cowards contributing to the death of the U.S. .
Jankatarch@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 60d
Class action lawsuits don't mean anything in the US ngl.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 60d
Class action lawsuits + general strikes? I'm pretty sure that would mean a hell of a lot, especially to the people drowning in despair due to... the 'everything' situation.
Smaile@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 60d
cool wake me up to when they actaully do that.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 60d
Not the point of the thread Canadian, you'll notice my initial comment calls them spineless cowards.
Smaile@lemmy.ca · -1 pts · 60d
You misunderstand, I don't believe it will actually happen. Your country has proven its unwillingness to stand up to or stop your current crop of leadership, I simply don't believe it'll happen.
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 60d
KeenFlame@feddit.nu · 2 pts · 60d
Why even have a legal system only for companies to battle their lawyers at a game of taking things from us? Why not just put hypercapitalism even more and allow them to buy politicians and laws? Or wait
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 60d
Because any money won is split amongst the members of the class action. So, the larger is literally pennies for the aggrieved, unless it’s literally $5 per member. Is that really motivating? $5 is a joke, what’s the value that’s worth a squeeze? $100?
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 60d
I don't think the payout is as important as taking money away from tech giants is. It isn't an efficient usage of the money, of course that money could be spent to greater effect than just splitting it up piecemeal. Yes, it likely is a pittance compared to what billionaires are worth. However if literally everyone struck these people at the same time, class action lawsuits being brought against all tech giants alongside general strikes — suddenly they're hemorrhaging money outside of the lawsuits and their technofascist bubble pops.
Certainly naive to believe — as I've said the people I'm talking about are mostly spineless cowards that are contributing directly to fascism. I have no misgivings about whether what I want to happen will happen or not.
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 60d
it must be entirely coincidental that employee performance dropped by 10% across the board
wizzkidd@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 61d
United we stand, divided we fall. Gotta fight these pricks united.
Amberskin@europe.pub · 8 pts · 61d
Yup, the immediate response should be a walk out.
mushroommunk@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 60d
Immediately following by forming a union
Amberskin@europe.pub · 2 pts · 59d
Not being union is, right now, laboral suicide.
bridgeburner@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 60d
This CEO prolly thinks he's generous cos he ain't firing them (yet) lol. So the peasant employees should be grateful for having still a job in the first place lol
Newsteinleo@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 60d
They did four round of layoffs last year
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 61d
#2020s_suck
frog_brawler@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 60d
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 60d
Why the fuck should anyone feel compelled to give two weeks to a company that would never extend the same courtesy
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 61d
Yep that's basically what they said at my job too.
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 60d
Can you name and shame them without doxing yourself?
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 59d
Not sure; probably not.
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 59d
That's fair. Maybe look to your local unions?
They will give you resources to unionize.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 60d
Lol you get a 50k bonus, 50k anthropic credits that is lmao
Peffse@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 62d
badgermurphy@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 60d
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 62d
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 60d
!fuck_ai@lemmy.world
kingblaaak@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 61d
Build your own AI agent and sell it to your company. It only works when you are around, and profit the money, they are investing it with.