It's almost like conservatives control the vast majority of media conglomerates and subsequently control the types of content that their outlets put out.
This is what frustrates me about all the Ground News ad reads I see on youtube channels that I otherwise respect (Legal Eagle, and Some More News for example). Despite the claims about 'left' or 'right' media, they're still all corporate owned media, and will only serve corporate interests.
I think it's more complex than that. I think it's accurate that the majority of mainstream reporting writers are actually liberal (or left, but definitions get pretty sticky).
This left bias coincides with a bias towards reality. The problem is that they are trained to remove bias from their reporting, and in removing their left bias when reporting on the left, their also remove their reality bias.
My brother/sister in Christ. Read the NYT every day for a week and then tell me with a straight face they’ve removed bias from their reporting. I mean, really…
It's not about reality or not reality. No matter what you think about each individual Network they're all corporate owned. That's their bias. They don't report reality if it goes against the corporate interests either.
if i had a nickel for every time conservatives propped up a dementia riddled alzheimers patient in order to cling to power despite not being popular i'd have two nickels which isn't a lot but it's fuckin depressing it happened twice
Reagan wasn't nearly so damned obvious. Trump is a fucking train wreck. If any of us had a relative talking like him we would have been planning on a nursing home 3 or 4 years ago. At this point he can barely speak at all.
Just a couple of days ago, right here. He's rambling and making shit up and has no clue he's doing so.
That’s just if you’re talking about the presidency. Mitch McConnell still holds his office in the senate today, years after publicly freezing in confusion multiple times.
The corporate bosses are worried about falling out of favor with the fascist administration. The lawsuits are small potatoes compared to other tools available to a dictator.
It's cowardly, but it's also rational. Nobody's opinion is going to be changed by something like that. And doing it would just result in Trump retaliating against them. Lawsuits are only one tiny portion of what they'd face. CBS arguably axed Colbert because Trump was using the FTC's approval of their merger as leverage. The AP didn't rename the Gulf of America and as a result they were barred from his press events.
Is it better to use the term "Gulf of America" if it means that you can still have reporters at his news conferences to ask tough questions? Probably. Is it better to avoid asking questions that are too tough if if means you get to go to the next news conference? Um... Is it better to not have op-eds that piss off Trump if it means that you can report on factual stories without too much interference? Err..
We're in a new situation now. It used to be that the press had some power because it was the only way for the President to get a message to the people. Even things like the Fireside Chats that were carried unedited still required that the NBC radio stations carry the broadcast. If the president tried to prevent the press from doing their job, they could cut him off from getting a message to the people. Now the press no longer has that power, the president can talk to his supporters directly using his own media platform.
A news conference used to be something where there was a balance of power. The president had some leverage because the news stations wanted to be there to report the news. They wanted to be able to ask tough questions that would make viewers tune in, or readers buy the newspaper. The news had some leverage because if the major networks didn't show up to a news conference, the things said at that news conference wouldn't reach the people.
Now it's completely one-sided. The press reporting the president's statements is nice to have, but he can reach people through his own media platform(s) if he chooses to. So he no longer needs them, but they still need him.
Also, here are 10 articles, ranging from 2023 to two weeks ago, about Trump's cognitive decline, including op eds from CNN and the Boston Globe questioning his fitness and an article from the Atlantic about why questioning his cognition isn't as effective as it should be:
Archived link, because I guess that headline was too ambiguous. The Hill op ed was also written this year, and while they aren't op eds, I shared three other articles from 2025 about Trump's mental state, and this was just from a cursory web search. The point is, the press is talking about this, even if its not leading to the outcome we want.
I'm just so sick of this bullshit narrative. The media ignored Biden's decline until it was undeniable, and Democrats act like a few journalists doing postmortem well after the election is a huge betrayal. Meanwhile, Trump's aging is getting far more coverage than Biden's got, but liberals are pretending there's a conspiracy to ignore it because the cabinet hasn't invoked the 25th amendment. It's infuriating.
I think it feels this way because - while articles are one thing - social media "atmosphere" was very different. I couldn't go two posts without someone calling for Biden's resignation, and it was all over the place, whereas with Trump it's... Like, yeah, a couple of more prominent Democrats do that, but not really, and otherwise it seems like everyone just goes "such is life now".
Criticizing their favorite politician means they're un-American, and must be purged to ensure the security of party unity.
Democrats are just becoming more like Republicans every day. Next time a comedian calls out Newsom, they'll say they need to be deported back to Russia.
I literally read and article this morning about makeup on Trump's had to hide bruises.
Also, the right does not care how old he is as long has he slashed "entitlement" programs and deports brown people. The left only cares if the news is that he is actively dying because they know the right does not care.
The post seems to be saying they aren't calling for him to resign or be impeached for being in declining health. Otherwise yeah I agree with what you are saying
Point being it's not mainstream news, not in the way they hammered Biden. There's an article now and again, with a low key criticism or question, but that's it.
It's not exactly a secret, when a neoliberal normalizes the shitty thing republicans do, it's newsworthy. Then people aren't as upset when Republicans keep doing it
That's literally what "normalizing" means and leads, do people honestly still not understand all of this?
What is there that people are so shocked by, that they keep spamming the copy paste social media comment in OP picture?
I find it odd that everyone made the dementia claim for Biden mis speaking. Go look at his Wikipedia page, he's been known for flubbing words his whole life.
Don't waste your time going to bat for Biden. He was very obviously not fit for office anymore, and the democrats ruined their chances of winning by keeping him in there until it was too late.
He did keep Trump's concentration camps from the first term open though. Past performance is the best predictor of future performance. And if another Democrat like Biden or Harris wins in 2028, odds are they will keep ICE unchanged. The pattern of immigration policy for the last 20 years has been that the far-right Republican position of today becomes the mainstream Democrat position five years from now. Democrats repeatedly run towards the right on immigration, hoping to pander to the racist vote. It never works of course, but they never learn.
There's no need for anyone to tell anyone anything.
The rich shitweasels who own one media conglomerate have enough common interests with the rich shitweasels who own another media conglomerate that they tend to arrive at more or less the same decisions and same policies even if they do so wholly and completely separately.
That's generally the case broadly too - not just in this instance, or even just regarding media conglomerates.
I don't disagree on your last point, but age is a factor that I don't think matters as much as you imply at first. In the sense that different people are affected in different ways. A good president or politician won't be defined by their age. You know who is older than Biden? Sanders, and he might be one of the most lucid and seemingly good politicians all around (but I'm not in the USA so my understanding is limited, at least what I have heard of him is extremely positive).
That's not to say that I'd rather have younger people involved in important roles in politics, there's too many that should be completely retired, and Biden is one of them. But age is not the main issue.
Generic statements such as "X age is too old for anyone to be president" is the issue. Some people at 80 could be healthy and lucid enough to be president and some at 60 might not. Age is not a limiting factor equally for everyone, so such judging should be made individually for each person and not with a blank statement.
Not accountable to death is a complex topic, for the same reason that they won't see the consequences of their ruling, they might also rule for more "pure" reasons and not to make friends in high places or pocket all they can to retire and live life. So I'm not sure that's the negative point you seem to think it is.
The fact that someone is more likely to die soon shouldn't be a reason to block them from doing something long term, or think they can't provide a real positive effect.
What we do agree on is that the lack of younger representation in politics is indeed a worrying topic.
You brought up Biden first. You are the one “other guy”-ing. The concern is that the current president of the United States is obviously not of sound mind or body. Biden doesn’t matter anymore.
The title was referring to the fact that when Biden was in office, people wouldn’t shut up about his condition. Now that we have a guy in even worse in the same office, people say nothing about it. This isn’t “my guy”-ism, it’s concern over the president of the united states.
I didn't bring Biden up and he's not "my guy". I voted for him as the lesser evil and supported just about every progressive protest against him. Most of the problems he championed fixing were things he created earlier in his career. But no matter the accusation against Biden, Trump is far, far worse. Not "just as bad".
87 Comments
Jesusaurus@lemmy.world · 172 pts · 350d
It's almost like conservatives control the vast majority of media conglomerates and subsequently control the types of content that their outlets put out.
A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world · 73 pts · 350d
bUt tHe lIbErAl mEdIa
Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 37 pts · 350d
I heartily chortle anytime someone tells me that.
Almacca@aussie.zone · 25 pts · 350d
This is what frustrates me about all the Ground News ad reads I see on youtube channels that I otherwise respect (Legal Eagle, and Some More News for example). Despite the claims about 'left' or 'right' media, they're still all corporate owned media, and will only serve corporate interests.
hypnotoad__@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 350d
ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com · 11 pts · 350d
I think it's more complex than that. I think it's accurate that the majority of mainstream reporting writers are actually liberal (or left, but definitions get pretty sticky).
This left bias coincides with a bias towards reality. The problem is that they are trained to remove bias from their reporting, and in removing their left bias when reporting on the left, their also remove their reality bias.
PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 350d
My brother/sister in Christ. Read the NYT every day for a week and then tell me with a straight face they’ve removed bias from their reporting. I mean, really…
njm1314@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 350d
It's not about reality or not reality. No matter what you think about each individual Network they're all corporate owned. That's their bias. They don't report reality if it goes against the corporate interests either.
WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 350d
No, it’s almost like “the left” in the US (such as it is) is tacitly allowing it at best and complicit at worst.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 350d
The people in control of the media switch side back and forth as it suit them and they never lose because red and blue are the same shit.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 70 pts · 350d
if i had a nickel for every time conservatives propped up a dementia riddled alzheimers patient in order to cling to power despite not being popular i'd have two nickels which isn't a lot but it's fuckin depressing it happened twice
shalafi@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 350d
Reagan wasn't nearly so damned obvious. Trump is a fucking train wreck. If any of us had a relative talking like him we would have been planning on a nursing home 3 or 4 years ago. At this point he can barely speak at all.
Just a couple of days ago, right here. He's rambling and making shit up and has no clue he's doing so.
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 350d
I mean, there was shit like this going on with Reagan.
Thunderbird4@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 350d
That’s just if you’re talking about the presidency. Mitch McConnell still holds his office in the senate today, years after publicly freezing in confusion multiple times.
jordanlund@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 350d
Because Biden wouldn't threaten you with lawsuits if you said mean things about him.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 350d
I don't think it's lawsuits that the journalists are worried about.
shane@feddit.nl · 5 pts · 350d
But it is what their corporate bosses are worried about.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 350d
The corporate bosses are worried about falling out of favor with the fascist administration. The lawsuits are small potatoes compared to other tools available to a dictator.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 349d
The fascist administration they ACTIVELY HELPED GET INTO POWER. That's what they're afraid of
merc@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 350d
It's cowardly, but it's also rational. Nobody's opinion is going to be changed by something like that. And doing it would just result in Trump retaliating against them. Lawsuits are only one tiny portion of what they'd face. CBS arguably axed Colbert because Trump was using the FTC's approval of their merger as leverage. The AP didn't rename the Gulf of America and as a result they were barred from his press events.
Is it better to use the term "Gulf of America" if it means that you can still have reporters at his news conferences to ask tough questions? Probably. Is it better to avoid asking questions that are too tough if if means you get to go to the next news conference? Um... Is it better to not have op-eds that piss off Trump if it means that you can report on factual stories without too much interference? Err..
We're in a new situation now. It used to be that the press had some power because it was the only way for the President to get a message to the people. Even things like the Fireside Chats that were carried unedited still required that the NBC radio stations carry the broadcast. If the president tried to prevent the press from doing their job, they could cut him off from getting a message to the people. Now the press no longer has that power, the president can talk to his supporters directly using his own media platform.
A news conference used to be something where there was a balance of power. The president had some leverage because the news stations wanted to be there to report the news. They wanted to be able to ask tough questions that would make viewers tune in, or readers buy the newspaper. The news had some leverage because if the major networks didn't show up to a news conference, the things said at that news conference wouldn't reach the people.
Now it's completely one-sided. The press reporting the president's statements is nice to have, but he can reach people through his own media platform(s) if he chooses to. So he no longer needs them, but they still need him.
besselj@lemmy.ca · 50 pts · 350d
The revolution will not be televized.
hypnotoad__@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 350d
TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 350d
He's the one
Who likes all our pretty songs
And he likes to sing along
And he likes to shoot his gun
But he knows not what it means
chrislowles@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 350d
KNOWS NOT WHAT IT MEANS
al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 350d
What's your point? Many conservative shit stains love rage against the machine.
Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online · 1 pts · 350d
Gil Scott-Heron?
pjwestin@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 350d
Questions about Biden's fitness were brushed aside until he had an unprecedented meltdown during a live debate. Also, Trump's health was a major news story just last month, when he was diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency. This also came up again this week when people spotted badly applied makeup to his hand. Also, it was a minor news story when Trump fell asleep during Pope Francis' funeral. And his meeting with the Saudis. And his press conference wirh Dr. Oz. And his trial last year.
Also, here are 10 articles, ranging from 2023 to two weeks ago, about Trump's cognitive decline, including op eds from CNN and the Boston Globe questioning his fitness and an article from the Atlantic about why questioning his cognition isn't as effective as it should be:
CNN-11/13/2023: Trump’s mental gaffes can’t be ignored
The Atlantic-2/16/2024:Why Attacks on Trump’s Mental Acuity Don’t Land
The LA Times-9/25/2024: Trump’s rhetorical walkabouts: A sign of ‘genius’ or cognitive decline?
NBC-10/15/2024: Trump's bizarre music session reignites questions about his mental acuity
The Hill-5/7/2025: Is Trump losing his mind à la Biden?
Boston Globe-5/17/2025: Biden is no longer President. Let's talk about Trump's mental acuity.
Rolling Stone-5/25/2025: Jasmine Crockett: ‘It’s Time for Republicans to Question Trump’s Mental Acuity’
Penn Live-6/2/2025: Donald Trump accused of ‘crazy cognitive decline’ after fumbling ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ press conference
The Economic Times-6/24/2025: 'Constant lapses and verbal aphasias': Republican advisor drops a bomb on Donald Trump's mental health
Salon-8/13/2025: Trump’s Soviet slip revives concerns about his mental acuity
Dasus@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 350d
The comment clearly states in a major newspaper, this year.
Granted you've linked some major newspapers, and some stories from this year, but not a single story in a major newspaper from this year.
That's the point. It's clearly dialed back, because he's in power and crazy.
pjwestin@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 350d
Dasus@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 350d
Pay walled
pjwestin@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 350d
Archived link, because I guess that headline was too ambiguous. The Hill op ed was also written this year, and while they aren't op eds, I shared three other articles from 2025 about Trump's mental state, and this was just from a cursory web search. The point is, the press is talking about this, even if its not leading to the outcome we want.
eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 349d
How dare you give sources when they wanna circlejerk about their favorite out of touch boomer!
pjwestin@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 349d
I'm just so sick of this bullshit narrative. The media ignored Biden's decline until it was undeniable, and Democrats act like a few journalists doing postmortem well after the election is a huge betrayal. Meanwhile, Trump's aging is getting far more coverage than Biden's got, but liberals are pretending there's a conspiracy to ignore it because the cabinet hasn't invoked the 25th amendment. It's infuriating.
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 349d
I think it feels this way because - while articles are one thing - social media "atmosphere" was very different. I couldn't go two posts without someone calling for Biden's resignation, and it was all over the place, whereas with Trump it's... Like, yeah, a couple of more prominent Democrats do that, but not really, and otherwise it seems like everyone just goes "such is life now".
eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 349d
Criticizing their favorite politician means they're un-American, and must be purged to ensure the security of party unity.
Democrats are just becoming more like Republicans every day. Next time a comedian calls out Newsom, they'll say they need to be deported back to Russia.
Newsteinleo@midwest.social · 27 pts · 350d
I literally read and article this morning about makeup on Trump's had to hide bruises.
Also, the right does not care how old he is as long has he slashed "entitlement" programs and deports brown people. The left only cares if the news is that he is actively dying because they know the right does not care.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 350d
The post seems to be saying they aren't calling for him to resign or be impeached for being in declining health. Otherwise yeah I agree with what you are saying
theonetruedroid@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 350d
They only care about your physical health when you oppose them.
Xatolos@reddthat.com · 25 pts · 350d
bUt AlL nEwSpApErS aRe LeFtIeS pRoPaGaNdA
Aneb@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 350d
LEFtIes pRoPaGaNaA 2025: but Hitler made a lot of good points, both sides had issues
rockettaco37@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 350d
That's because this is a war on information. Has been since day one.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 350d
What's weird is this has a new timestamp but I've seen this text verbatim for months now...
It's also completely wrong, fucking everyone talks about how trump's brain is mush
shalafi@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 350d
Point being it's not mainstream news, not in the way they hammered Biden. There's an article now and again, with a low key criticism or question, but that's it.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 350d
They're out there...
Here's one from 2 days ago
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-dementia-alert-touch-grass/
It's not exactly a secret, when a neoliberal normalizes the shitty thing republicans do, it's newsworthy. Then people aren't as upset when Republicans keep doing it
That's literally what "normalizing" means and leads, do people honestly still not understand all of this?
What is there that people are so shocked by, that they keep spamming the copy paste social media comment in OP picture?
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 350d
Again: not mainstream news.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 350d
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5429516-trump-confabulation-dementia-signs/
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 350d
Again: not mainstream news.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 350d
Bought media is like that
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 350d
Trump rambling about medians during press conference. Seth meyers points out Trumps dementia all the time. https://youtube.com/shorts/pY06vb1Cxl0
Hubi@feddit.org · 13 pts · 350d
Probably because it isn't news. All of these things have been established for years.
eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 349d
Biden showing worsening signs was news, Trump has always been incoherent and unhealthy.
But reporting on the news is a bad thing, somehow.
DarkCloud@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 350d
I find it odd that everyone made the dementia claim for Biden mis speaking. Go look at his Wikipedia page, he's been known for flubbing words his whole life.
He's spoken many many times about it.
OccamsRazer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 350d
Don't waste your time going to bat for Biden. He was very obviously not fit for office anymore, and the democrats ruined their chances of winning by keeping him in there until it was too late.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 350d
Dementia Joe didn't tell masked goons to abduct people in broad daylight
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 350d
He did keep Trump's concentration camps from the first term open though. Past performance is the best predictor of future performance. And if another Democrat like Biden or Harris wins in 2028, odds are they will keep ICE unchanged. The pattern of immigration policy for the last 20 years has been that the far-right Republican position of today becomes the mainstream Democrat position five years from now. Democrats repeatedly run towards the right on immigration, hoping to pander to the racist vote. It never works of course, but they never learn.
commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 350d
Why would they, Trump has been nothing but good to the capitalists, while Biden was merely kept the status quo.
wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 350d
Why do you think that is? Has someone told them to back off? Who?
WatDabney@sopuli.xyz · 15 pts · 350d
There's no need for anyone to tell anyone anything.
The rich shitweasels who own one media conglomerate have enough common interests with the rich shitweasels who own another media conglomerate that they tend to arrive at more or less the same decisions and same policies even if they do so wholly and completely separately.
That's generally the case broadly too - not just in this instance, or even just regarding media conglomerates.
ALLHAILHYPNOTOAD@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 350d
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club · 7 pts · 350d
News control is like 101 ...
Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 350d
Funny that.
Chronographs@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 350d
They know that he’s way too narcissistic to ever step down and the republicans controlled legislative branch has no shot of impeaching him again
friend_of_satan@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 350d
"New clue unlocked!"
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 350d
That's because "News" is a product for the poors. 🤌🏼
TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 350d
hayes_@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 350d
TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 349d
mrlemmyhimself@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 350d
Democrats are not the left
TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 349d
yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 350d
I don't disagree on your last point, but age is a factor that I don't think matters as much as you imply at first. In the sense that different people are affected in different ways. A good president or politician won't be defined by their age. You know who is older than Biden? Sanders, and he might be one of the most lucid and seemingly good politicians all around (but I'm not in the USA so my understanding is limited, at least what I have heard of him is extremely positive).
That's not to say that I'd rather have younger people involved in important roles in politics, there's too many that should be completely retired, and Biden is one of them. But age is not the main issue.
TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 349d
yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 347d
Generic statements such as "X age is too old for anyone to be president" is the issue. Some people at 80 could be healthy and lucid enough to be president and some at 60 might not. Age is not a limiting factor equally for everyone, so such judging should be made individually for each person and not with a blank statement.
Not accountable to death is a complex topic, for the same reason that they won't see the consequences of their ruling, they might also rule for more "pure" reasons and not to make friends in high places or pocket all they can to retire and live life. So I'm not sure that's the negative point you seem to think it is.
The fact that someone is more likely to die soon shouldn't be a reason to block them from doing something long term, or think they can't provide a real positive effect.
What we do agree on is that the lack of younger representation in politics is indeed a worrying topic.
TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 347d
zeropointone@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 350d
_stranger_@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 350d
Dementia isn't a deal breaker. Neither is being paralyzed. You could run for president as a catatonic coma patient if you wanted.
A narcissist would never resign unless it's in their own greatest self interest.
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · -16 pts · 350d
Biden literally does have dementia though.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 350d
Is Biden in office?
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 350d
He was at the time, yes
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · -12 pts · 350d
Not anymore, no.
So maybe people need to stop bringing it up?
Not to mention, it's a shitty argument. What you're saying when you bring this up is: "Your guy is as shitty as our guy!"
baggachipz@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 350d
You brought up Biden first. You are the one “other guy”-ing. The concern is that the current president of the United States is obviously not of sound mind or body. Biden doesn’t matter anymore.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 350d
What? Biden is literally in the title.
baggachipz@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 350d
The title was referring to the fact that when Biden was in office, people wouldn’t shut up about his condition. Now that we have a guy in even worse in the same office, people say nothing about it. This isn’t “my guy”-ism, it’s concern over the president of the united states.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 349d
Ok?
That doesn't really have any bearing on what I said
goldfndr@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 349d
A mention of Biden in the title is what you said, and it was directly addressed. Full bearing achieved.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 350d
I didn't bring Biden up and he's not "my guy". I voted for him as the lesser evil and supported just about every progressive protest against him. Most of the problems he championed fixing were things he created earlier in his career. But no matter the accusation against Biden, Trump is far, far worse. Not "just as bad".
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 350d
lmfao wtf does that have to do with any goddamn thing in 2025
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 350d
Exactly.
Why are people still pretending that wasn't the case?
RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 350d
Which is why he didn't run again.
Your senile leader did.
eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 349d
He tried to until his party made him leave.
Also FlashMob isn't a trump supporter. Neither am I. I even voted for Harris too before that thought terminating cliche is pulled.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 350d
Trump definitely has dementia. He rambled about medians during his send troops to the capital press conference. https://youtube.com/shorts/pY06vb1Cxl0
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 350d
Absolutely he does.
Makes you wish the Democrats had done the right thing and opted to not normalize it.
mrdown@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 350d
Both has it . Why you dneying one but not the other having it?
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 350d
What?
jcb20165@kbin.melroy.org · -24 pts · 350d
He’s been in office for 8 months Lib .. He has constitutional lawyers around him to make sure he isn’t breaking the law..
Calm down!
subignition@fedia.io · 10 pts · 350d
🤡
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 350d
No he doesn't.