Yup. Explains why half of the Republican leadership is closeted gay men. And why so many of them fetishize trans people, despite being against having rights.
These conservatives are all the same. Sexually repressed and angry about it. The least harmful of which listen to fox news and get their rocks of later thinking about Tucker Carsol explaining "exploding milk porn". Then it only gets worse from there.
But the reason they are so obsessed with sexual identity is because they were never allowed to explore their own and have never satisfied their partner in bed.
The general term for partially "animal" tail/ear combos like these is "cat-girl/boy". It doesn't have to be a cat specifically. Cat is just used as a catch all for it.
Most of these combos aren't really clear and more just aesthetic differences. Fox/Cat/Dog/Bunny etc ear/tail combos are commonly overlapping. So the general term I see most used is "cat girl/boy".
The leash is associated with any animal submissive in "pet play" relationships where the submissive is acting as the "pet" to their dom. But the leash can just be aesthetic choice. Cat boy/girls aren't always into pet-play.
And I'm sure there are people that will literally do everything as a cat-girl/boy or literally people that dress up for fun sometimes. It's not always sexual or even a lifestyle choice.
I do care because they shouldn't minoritize members of their own family for their gender or orientation. That isn't like some not eating pigs or drawing ash on your face shit, it's oppressive and wrong.
I used to work with this dude who was an asshole, had to work at a place with protesters around, they decided they should scream at him, it was entertaining.
I consider high heels, fishnet stockings, and/or exposed bra straps to be a sexual things. Does that mean no one else is allowed to wear any of those in public now?
No, I don't think it is. Also in many conservative minds they also believe all that stuff is sexual. They believe the existence of all gay couple in a show means shoving gay sex down childrens throats, even if they only hug.
My sister got in trouble with the religion we were in because she was too curvy. The accusation of lying here might be a bit of projection if you can't understand that some people will always make something sexual,and that even if you see it as sexual, not everyone does.
What I'm pointing out here is that you're equating two things that are actually different for most people present, but you fail to explain why.
In my view, there is a distinction between having sex in public, where everyone sees you, and wearing an accessory that suggests that your sex life elsewhere is rather kinky.
If you think those are the same, where do you draw the line? What about a rainbow flag/sticker/patch? This also might imply they are having sex a bit differently from you?
Also, let's not forget that this is a photo taken in a specific situation. Who knows if they were just wearing it there?
I don't want to totally derail you here, and I do understand where you're coming from - but is it interesting to you that you say "making out" requires consent from other people to see but that a "regular kiss, hug, or other purely romantic or platonic show of affection" does not?
Genuinely, without meaning to sound hostile - why does what you are comfortable seeing dictate what other people need to get consent from the public for? What if I'm uncomfortable seeing any kind of kissing at all? What if I'm completely comfortable seeing more than you?
Why can't I draw the line and decide what requires consent from the public instead of you? I might well draw that line in a different place entirely.
97 Comments
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 219 pts · 1y
I like how he's taking a snapshot for his spankbank.
FerretyFever0@fedia.io · 110 pts · 1y
Conservatives sure do love jacking off to the things that they claim to hate... like an insane amount tbh
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 78 pts · 1y
Sexual repression do be like that.
FerretyFever0@fedia.io · 53 pts · 1y
Yup. Explains why half of the Republican leadership is closeted gay men. And why so many of them fetishize trans people, despite being against having rights.
ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 1y
How can they blackmail trans people/keep them as slaves if they have rights? That’s the true reason behind them being anti-trans
vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 1y
Sex is sin, so they fetishize sin.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 88 pts · 1y
He's taking "EVIDENCE" .... and he needs lots of documentation ... "I just need one where you arch your back some more"
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 1y
He'll repent later.
Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de · 35 pts · 1y
His going to abuse his dick like it was his 5th wife.
leftthegroup@lemmings.world · 10 pts · 1y
crusa187@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 1y
Camera Snapshot Sound
wheezy@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 364d
These conservatives are all the same. Sexually repressed and angry about it. The least harmful of which listen to fox news and get their rocks of later thinking about Tucker Carsol explaining "exploding milk porn". Then it only gets worse from there.
But the reason they are so obsessed with sexual identity is because they were never allowed to explore their own and have never satisfied their partner in bed.
parody@lemmings.world · 4 pts · 1y
Simple!
Roll camera at all times
Say horrible, horrible things
Hide desperation to be punched so you can sue
ICastFist@programming.dev · 129 pts · 1y
Goshdarned hot lesbian furries! click click click
Have they no shame? click click click
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org · 19 pts · 364d
☝️the funniest part of the pic
wheezy@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 364d
Ok. Not to be "that guy" but these are clearly cat-girls and not furries.
ICastFist@programming.dev · 4 pts · 363d
> two plushie dogs
> dog leash and collars
> cat-girls
Something doesn't add up
wheezy@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 363d
The general term for partially "animal" tail/ear combos like these is "cat-girl/boy". It doesn't have to be a cat specifically. Cat is just used as a catch all for it.
Most of these combos aren't really clear and more just aesthetic differences. Fox/Cat/Dog/Bunny etc ear/tail combos are commonly overlapping. So the general term I see most used is "cat girl/boy".
The leash is associated with any animal submissive in "pet play" relationships where the submissive is acting as the "pet" to their dom. But the leash can just be aesthetic choice. Cat boy/girls aren't always into pet-play.
And I'm sure there are people that will literally do everything as a cat-girl/boy or literally people that dress up for fun sometimes. It's not always sexual or even a lifestyle choice.
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 74 pts · 1y
i wan be grl
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 59 pts · 1y
You are, even if backwards medical systems prevent you from living as one.
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 42 pts · 1y
nunu they allow me to.,,.. but thanksi either way <3
bdonvr@thelemmy.club · 20 pts · 1y
Gender is a fuck
applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 364d
me tu
Stamets@lemmy.world · 74 pts · 1y
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 36 pts · 1y
I do care because they shouldn't minoritize members of their own family for their gender or orientation. That isn't like some not eating pigs or drawing ash on your face shit, it's oppressive and wrong.
F04118F@feddit.nl · 8 pts · 364d
You're mostly right. Maybe eating pigs is not oppressive or wrong, but what happens to the pigs before they get eaten sure is.
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 364d
then get it from farms that don't to that, it only costs multiple times the price
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 364d
I practically have a recipe that only has 4 hard boiled eggs as an animal product. There's no other reliable source of Vitamin B12
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz · 18 pts · 364d
repent dude seems to be taking photos of the cuties.
Stamets@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 364d
MML@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 1y
I used to work with this dude who was an asshole, had to work at a place with protesters around, they decided they should scream at him, it was entertaining.
glorkon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 364d
"Chase them with dildos". This made me chuckle uncontrollably.
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 60 pts · 1y
I want to be as hot as them
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 47 pts · 1y
Put on the cat ears then :3
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 1y
I didn’t pack them so they are back home :(
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 364d
but i wan ouppy ear
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 364d
then put on the collar and bark!
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 364d
Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof :D
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 1y
Keep up the good work, ladies!
Ephera@lemmy.ml · 39 pts · 1y
Somehow that sign saying "CAUTION! Low Bridge Clearance 15ft. Large Trucks Prohibited" cracks me up the most.
Landless2029@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 364d
11ft8?
DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works · 37 pts · 1y
Hot take: he's not religious at all, just does the sign to get some action he can film for "later".
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 pts · 364d
LONG BACON!!!
Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 47 pts · 364d
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 364d
Heck, I thought it was a lanyard but just realised it's a leash 😳
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 364d
I want a long bacon leash,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 364d
right?!?
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 364d
Woof :D
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 364d
barkbarkbark!!! :3
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 364d
Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof :D
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 364d
Are you from /r Collapse?
Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 1 pts · 364d
no
Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 26 pts · 1y
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 21 pts · 1y
:3
Gullible@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 1y
So, what’s the deal with teens wearing tails? It’s become a common thing near me
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 47 pts · 1y
Soft furry and pet play being fun?
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 364d
Woof c:
name_NULL111653@pawb.social · 27 pts · 1y
Is cute and fluffy and you can pet and comfy uwu
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 1y
I was a teen in the early-to-mid-2000s and I wore a tail often
Gullible@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 364d
‘Bout 10 years early on that 30 year fashion cycle
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 364d
Oh I never stopped, my partner and I will wear ears and tails while shopping because uwu
hopesdead@startrek.website · 10 pts · 1y
I saw multiple instances this year of teens wearing those inflatable arm cuffs for swimming that you give little kids.
Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 1y
wristbands are cool
grrgyle@slrpnk.net · 10 pts · 1y
I think it's a furry thing.
snoons@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 1y
Woof and/or Meow
Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 364d
Woof woof woof c:
espurr@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 364d
his master plan worked..
Aneb@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 364d
He has his phone out. It really looks like his plan was to capture some hot fem girls with tails and ears on his phone
wowwoweowza@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 364d
I think those two kitties are putting them evil thoughts into the pious obese man’s head.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 364d
Someone needs to show up next to him with a sign that says "diet and exercise or perish","also learn to mind your own damn business"
FuckFascism@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 364d
Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone · 13 pts · 364d
Whats the line for? I have a sudden urge to queue and i think i like it.
LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 1y
Who are the cuties and why do they need to repe….. oh. Now I see the fuckface
Midnitte@beehaw.org · 11 pts · 364d
I love that he's taking a photo - he doesn't look outraged, he looks interested. Typical
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 16 pts · 364d
Grindr gets higher traffic whenever there's a "Republican" National Convention.
Not that surprising indeed.
Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 1y
this is epic as fuck
froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 364d
repent for you homophobia or perish
Iloveyurianime@ani.social · 5 pts · 364d
meow :3
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 364d
mygog i jus rlli dun look at womn anymor hm?..,.
dun evn care vrri much for the cat look - jus - jus.,,...
yea....,. womn r amazin.... im happi for thm,.
EDIT: im hidin dis post- evil feels comin up with it-
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 364d
I'm sorry you feel that way. You're a good girl
beejboytyson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 364d
Something tells me he's using that picture for J/O material.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 364d
At first I thought that lesbian bracelet was an Austrian one in which case you would have something to repent for
Gladaed@feddit.org · 3 pts · 364d
More like Revere and procreate.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d
Fat fuck signtoter is snapping them on his phone to jack to later
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · -18 pts · 1y
BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 pts · 1y
Why do you care
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · 0 pts · 1y
FlexibleToast@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y
That's the only sexual thing you see in that picture?
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 22 pts · 1y
Nah, kink is based and trying to censor it from queer culture is sex negative.
QualifiedKitten@discuss.online · 22 pts · 1y
I consider high heels, fishnet stockings, and/or exposed bra straps to be a sexual things. Does that mean no one else is allowed to wear any of those in public now?
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · -11 pts · 1y
chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 364d
No, I don't think it is. Also in many conservative minds they also believe all that stuff is sexual. They believe the existence of all gay couple in a show means shoving gay sex down childrens throats, even if they only hug.
My sister got in trouble with the religion we were in because she was too curvy. The accusation of lying here might be a bit of projection if you can't understand that some people will always make something sexual,and that even if you see it as sexual, not everyone does.
cadekat@pawb.social · 21 pts · 1y
So what if they are? Seeing someone being led around on a leash isn't gonna hurt anyone.
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · -8 pts · 1y
tja@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 1y
This is a false equivalence and you are lying if you say that you don't see this as one.
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · -6 pts · 1y
tja@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 364d
What I'm pointing out here is that you're equating two things that are actually different for most people present, but you fail to explain why.
In my view, there is a distinction between having sex in public, where everyone sees you, and wearing an accessory that suggests that your sex life elsewhere is rather kinky.
If you think those are the same, where do you draw the line? What about a rainbow flag/sticker/patch? This also might imply they are having sex a bit differently from you?
Also, let's not forget that this is a photo taken in a specific situation. Who knows if they were just wearing it there?
cadekat@pawb.social · 6 pts · 1y
Oh god, I didn't assume you're anywhere near the dickwad in the picture. You're all good on that front!
My point is, well, so what if two people are aggressively making out? What's inherently wrong with that?
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · 3 pts · 1y
rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 364d
I don't want to totally derail you here, and I do understand where you're coming from - but is it interesting to you that you say "making out" requires consent from other people to see but that a "regular kiss, hug, or other purely romantic or platonic show of affection" does not?
Genuinely, without meaning to sound hostile - why does what you are comfortable seeing dictate what other people need to get consent from the public for? What if I'm uncomfortable seeing any kind of kissing at all? What if I'm completely comfortable seeing more than you?
Why can't I draw the line and decide what requires consent from the public instead of you? I might well draw that line in a different place entirely.
noxypaws@pawb.social · 1 pts · 364d
Can you explain why you think leashes are a sexual thing?
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · -1 pts · 364d
noxypaws@pawb.social · 1 pts · 364d
You think they're aroused in that photo?
cadekat@pawb.social · 17 pts · 1y
What?
Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 1y
What's wrong with a little public BDSM to piss off conservatives?