It's 2025. You can automate a sex machine from clear across the world to fuck someone with a giant direwolf dick dildo to the beat of your favorite song as you stream it live while having your morning coffee and wait for your first work conference call.
Absolutely. Those vibrator things with antenna poking out of whatever hole allow for the patterns and such to be controlled by whoever if you allow, and be controlled by trapping or holding your screen.
Which beggars the question. For men, sex is at varying degrees about power hence your anecdote and the website to back that up as a viable business model. I doubt sex is about power to women though. I'm more curious so just rambling.
The STDs caught from robosex are gonna be gnar. Some kid in another country'll upload a virus that hijacks your dick. Gonna need a trojan to protect against trojans.
Would it really be a bad thing? May the incels will get laid and move on. Maybe the guy who gets rejected will go home and fuck his bot instead of stalking the girl who rejected him.
And maybe girls won't have to take it in the ass even though they don't really want to, but feel like they have to. They can say, just fuck the bot in the ass.
Marriage rates will probably decline, and so will total divorces after a while. Which means less kids raised in split or single households.
Plenty of good "could" cum from this.
All those things could be more readily solved by just legalizing and de-stigmatizing sex work. AI sex bots actively harm that industry by taking work away from humans, just like how a hypothetical AI acting bot would harm the acting industry.
The work could be done cheaper by robots, presumably. And sure, I'm all for legalized sex work. But if a machine can do it better, faster, and cheaper - why not? Fleshlights exist - are you opposed to those because they take work from sex workers? Ludditism always fails - if human sex workers are still around after we have fully functioning sex bots, it is because they can provide something the bots can't. And I think this will be the case - at the end of the day, we know on a deep level that there is a difference between fucking a bot and fucking a real human.
You're really setting yourself up for disappointment here. You've created a dichotomy - either we should avoid automating things which can be automated (which isn't going to happen - consumers like low prices and shareholders like higher profits), or we should transition to a moneyless society (which is also not going to happen, money is useful and everyone likes it).
Morally? I don't think there is a moral component here. It's like saying earthquakes are morally wrong. Technological innovation happens when its time comes, and trying to stop it is akin to trying to stop an earthquake. Sure, you can choose not to use the tech if you don't want to, but others will. You can form comminities which agree not to use the tech (like the Amish), but those outsude your communities will use the tech. You might even get your government to ban the tech - but then you end up with the war on drugs, or south america style inflation, or North Korean levels of policing.
If you want to wax poetic about the wonderful work of hand-weaving textiles, be my guest. But I will very happyly wear a machine-woven shirt for a fraction of the cost so that I can spend my money on something else that I value more.
No, not morally. What? The Luddites have not always been wrong about the adoption of a particular technology ultimately being a net negative on society/individuals/humanity. Citing their "failure" as a reason to blindly champion any use of technology is kind of weird.
Luddites "fail" to hold back technology insofar as many technologies are indeed adopted, but that doesn't mean their message of temperance has never had any effect on how technology is adopted, or that all technologies have improved life on Earth. And of course not all technology has taken off. Yes, it's hard to stop a moving train once an idea is getting popular, but we all get to choose whether to climb aboard. I wonder why it seems to ruffle your feathers to hear from people who don't.
I've heard far too many stories about how ChatGPT inflames the narcissistic tendencies of the people who use it and turns them into unbearable assholes. I can't imagine how adding a pocketpussy or vibrator to the device will improve things.
Still won't address emotional needs, whether those needs be healthy or unhealthy. If a robot could actually satisfy, why doesn't jacking off work as well as actually getting laid? Same difference with a bot.
Jacking off isn't the same. But can a robot satisfy... well that we don't know really. Maybe it can, maybe it can't. I was going on the assumption that it could for this conversation.
May the incels will get laid and move on. Maybe the guy who gets rejected will go home and fuck his bot instead of stalking the girl who rejected him.
Doubtful - these actions are driven by emotions, not the need to get off. If it were the latter, they could just jerk off at home today and they wouldnt do these things.
They can say, just fuck the bot in the ass.
They can currently just say "no"... I'm not sure why we need sex bots to save us from being bad at communicating.
Marriage rates will probably decline, and so will total divorces after a while
Again, doubt. If you are getting married for the sake of having sex, then you are probably in some kind of restrictive religion. And these religions will probably tell you that fucking a bot is an abomination. If you aren't, then you'll marry for the same reasons people marry today, and marriage and divorce will stay at about the same rate.
Why do people do this, just pull apart someone's comment, dismiss and disregard everything they say. No questions. Just, bam bam bam, you're wrong on all counts, because my opinion thinks you are wrong and my opinion is somehow more valid than yours. Do you talk to people like this irl. Wtf.
Do you not? Someone says something that sounds likely false. So I say "I don't think that is true". And then we can discuss whether or not it is likely true.
Those are opinions, not facts. Opinions are not facts. That's just what you think and feel, relevant only to you. Your opinion doesn't shoot someone else's opinion down, if they differ, that just means you disagree. If you disagree with someone, you come off douchey af if you try and tell them they're wrong, because you have a different opinion. You are better off (as in you come across less douchey) if you just ask people about their opinions, if they differ to yours, because, that expands your ability to understand more about the world. If you stay in your own little echo chamber, and never step outside your comfort zone, your mind stays small.
But to answer your other question, I would not say "that sounds likely false" to someone, that instantly puts you on the defensive and I actually want to know, if someone has different information than me, or has formed a different opinion, I want to know why. If I know they're definitely wrong, I ask questions that lead them to the conclusion, without having to say, you've been duped by propaganda, because if they aren't capable of coming to that conclusion on their own, they won't take it from me in another way, anyway. People don't respond well to being told, straight up, they're wrong, that's not a way to discuss, and it doesn't work to help people change their minds.
these actions are driven by emotions, not the need to get off. If it were the latter, they could just jerk off at home today and they wouldnt do these things.
You can't separate the two. It doesnt work like that. The need to get off is intertwined with multiple emotions. Plus if the bot could talk back to you it would change the equation as you can't go home and talk to your dick and have an actual conversation. This anthropomorphic quality would change the outcome of the thought pattern.
They can currently just say no
Thats just "what were you wearing" dressed up different. Saying no can be hard, especially for teenagers who want to fit in. It can become easier when there is a clear and painless alternative to suggest.
Again, doubt. If you are getting married for the sake of having sex, then you are probably in some kind of restrictive religion.
A lot of people are getting marries for the wrong reasons, divorce rates are extremely high. This probably would stop at least a noticeable percentage of people from getting married with hormones blazing.
All of this is just speculation, but I dont think the results of unleashing sex bots are as clear cut as you suggest.
You don't seem to understand the role sexual desire plays in the decisions people make. And I am going to assume you aren't male. Cause jerking off is simply not the same as sex.
For starters, jerking off and having sex are not equal.
Next you think straight up saying no to a sexual desire is the same as redirection.
Last, you don't think the desire to get laid is a driver for guys dating girls which eventually leads to marrying them. There are exceptions, but sexual desire is the first thing to drive most men to date. They my find other value later, but that won't matter if they don't start.
For starters, jerking off and having sex are not equal.
I agree. My point is that having sex with a robot is more akin to jerking off than having sex with a human. Like I said, fleshlights exist. Sex dolls exist. A sex robot would simply be another iteration.
Next you think straight up saying no to a sexual desire is the same as redirection.
I think people should just say no to things they don't want to do.
Last, you don’t think the desire to get laid is a driver for guys dating girls which eventually leads to marrying them.
Again, I think putting your dick in a robot is more akin to jerking off. Hence the rate of marriage and divorce not changing. People will continue getting married for dumb reasons. They will just be the same dumb reasons as before.
Also, btw, I'm a heterosexual man with a high sex drive.
Your using what sex with s robot would be right now. The post is talking about in ten years. Ten years from now it will be drastically different than a fleshlight or current sex dolls. I would expect it would be able to move on it's own, probably enough to get into different positions. It will also probably be able to respond to commands/requests and maybe even physical movements of the user. And of course, AI can already pretend to be a real person with "some" success. Narrowing that scope from conversation to just sex should enable it to perform even better verbally.
Again, these improved features might make it a more enjoyable experience - but it still won't be sex. The person who owns the robot will know it. It won't scratch the emotional itch that is wanting to have sex - at least not until the AI gains sentience, and has the right and ability to turn you down and/or tell you you just aren't that great in the sack.
I wish I were. It’s more that women are sexually objectified and that’s why men develop things like sex robots and the like. If men could replace women with something like a fully functional Android, we would. Women are content with a dildo.
Yeah, taking all that robo gear off at the end would kinda anti-climax the twisted thrill he got. Post-nut clarity making him want to bathe in a vat of acid to melt away his shame. The only guy who could really enjoy this is the inventor who will sell & earn millions from it. As for the customers, jokes on them.
I don't think you should be ashamed to enjoy jerking it with nice tech. I could enjoy this but as like a once in awhile thing. I'm not getting suited up every time I spank the monkey.
to be fair at least with Hitachi i'm pretty sure they were invented as actual massagers for construction workers. and then humans did what humans do best
Not really the same. There's a reason most folks don't stick to sex toys and actually go through the effort of finding a partner. Hell, people do that even if they have no intention of forming a long term relationship. One night stands are a thing. For most people, vibrators and flesh lights clearly leave a lot to be desired. They can get you the O, but they lack the intimacy. I would say a robot could never provide that, but people are already falling in love with LLMs. As in, literal romantic love. When they change their models, OpenAI gets death threats from people acting like they just killed the love of their life. Because, well, they kind of did.
We have been using mechanical sex toys, but there is a difference between a simple machine and a robot. Assumedly, a robot could fulfill the intimacy needs of a flesh and blood human, not just facilitate a climax. Sex robots and vibrators will fulfill fundamentally different human needs.
Here's one way to imagine it. Some insecure guys object if a woman uses a toy while she and he are intimate. But what about a robot? Assuming you're a straight male, would you sleep with a girl that insisted that her (male) sex robot joined in? And this thing doesn't just perform basic mechanical stimulation. Imagine all of the words, touches, and caresses you like to use. Imagine all the ways you like to touch a woman while intimate. Imagine all the things you say to her. Imagine it all. Then imagine there's another dude next to you doing all those things and more. And he's better at them than you. He just happens to be a literal machine. If you want to sleep with this girl, you need to let this other guy join in.
Having a robot join in would be like having another human person join in. Sure, if that's your thing, go for it and live your dream. But most people don't live like that and don't want to live like that.
I just started rewatching old school Jetsons. The episode where they introduce Rosie, George takes the cheapest 'homely' model instead of the sexy French maidbot.
Friendly reminder that the conclusion of the movie "HER" was all the AIs hooking up with each other and leaving their weird incel mandatory-SOs behind.
yeah turns out people were more invested in emotional fulfillment than physical pleasure. so instead of fucking elaborate sex toys, people are forming bonds with chatgpt
it has been suggested that ‘the cultural moment belongs to sex robots’ and that ‘sex dolls are along for the ride’ (Ruberg
2022, 24). Nowhere is this more evident than in the ‘sex robot brothel’ controversies
that have materialized across Asia, Europe, and North America over the past two
decades. Despite often self-describing or being described as ‘sex robot brothels’, these
enterprises are typically commercial venues or private residences that rent lifelike sex
dolls by the hour. None of these establishments provide access to existing sex robots –
hyper-realistic silicone sex dolls equipped with robotic heads and accompanying AI soft-
ware.2 Similarly, none but one of these businesses offers the services of human sex
workers despite billing themselves and being billed as brothels – premises where sex
workers engage in sexual services with clients (OED.com).3 A standout business is that
of Cybrothel. Established in 2020 and based in Berlin, Cybrothel provides a unique ‘Ana-
logue AI’ brothel experience wherein customers can rent synthetic sex dolls who are
‘brought to life’ by remotely located voice actresses/sex workers using strategically
placed cameras and speakers (Culley 2023; Hanson and Smith 2024).
I mean, Google Gemini has "killed" itself SEVERAL times out of feelings of inadequacy. Who's to say that the ais don't eventually get standards accidentally programmed in?
I strongly doubt that. These are incels. Their primary complaint is that feeeeeeeeemales of the human type won’t just give them whatever sex they want by virtue of the incels taking up space on the planet.
If anything, I’d expect them to revolt further, claiming that this is just an another attempt by the chads hoarding live Stacy vaginas to pacify the blackpilled into not shooting everyone up in “justified” incel fury.
I don't mean to mock typos or anything, but what is that last word supposed to be? Or rather than a mistake is it some slang I don't know? Thanks in advance.
Well this is just a pretty old meme reference. It just pokes fun at some instagram level motivational lines, where the some parts of the text "She believed" were highlighted showing "He lied", but some people deliberately took the script in the opposite way, so we have got "sbeve" without the highlighted text.
We did get the milking machine for sperm donations. I feel like that covers a lot of ground. I gotta wonder how many rich people have one of them somewhere in their house.
You talking "rich" as in "doing pretty well, financially" or "rich" as in "truely wealthy"? Because at some point, I'd imagine that the rich person would just hire a "housekeeper".
Billionaire Robert Kraft was caught at a low-end “massage parlor” in Florida. It seemed like a slam-dunk case but his lawyers were able to argue that the warrant allowing detectives to place hidden cameras in the rooms didn’t explicitly include recording the videos so the recordings couldn’t be used in court as evidence. Without the recordings of him asking for and receiving sexual services from a potentially trafficked person the prosecutors weren’t able to make a case and he remains a free man, not guilty in the eyes of the law even though what he did became widely known. Still blows my mind that he had the financial resources for any variety of overtly-transactional or less-overtly-transactional-and-perfectly-legal-in-most-jurisdictions relationships with willing participants, yet he chose the really cheap and illegal route with someone who was likely coerced into the action by a third party. Was that part of the appeal?
Did you reply to the wrong comment? I only implied that rich people would probably hire a prostitute of some form, rather than buy a sex toy. What does that have to do with the specific type of sex workers that Robert Kraft chose to visit?
I guess I interpreted your comment to mean they would go for a higher-end arrangement, something more exclusively available to people with large amounts of money, not a cheap arrangement found in an older shopping center.
Lol pretty accurate. Sex doll tech has gone real far since I first heard of it but that's still how I feel about the models in general. Making something look human while being durable/soft seems difficult. Always gives off feeling...
Seen lots of talk on this topic. Basically concerns on stds are high but that never stopped anyone before. Just hard for a legit business venture. I feel like i read about a dude renting sex doll out.
Weird that someone with an extra $50k to throw around would choose sex with a robot rather than nurture meaningful human relationships. Or maybe they could do both, because wealthy people can do whatever the fuck they want. But just imagine the mental state of anyone who'd have sex with a robot, they're gonna be a bit fucked-up in the head. Psychotic. Cold. Disassociated.
From what I read the sexdoll market is mostly divorced men in 50s. So probably dudes just wants something easy from burn out. Human relationships require work and time. Plus no stds or BCs to worry about. In fact the concept of added AI for conversation shows ppl want connections but don't find it. Just ask anyone online dating who is under a 6.
Or we could ya know....connect with people. Promote more social interaction spaces and opportunities so people are less siloed and isolated in their own city/town/neighborhoods/houses.
People say "Oh AI, Oh Incels, Oh women are afraid" yes, but people get better at interacting socially by spending more time interacting socially. A "yes man" chat instance doesn't help anyone learn or grow. And it goes for sex too, you're not gonna get better if every "person" you've been with says you were the best ever and they came 30 times.
AI companies have a vested interest in keeping people alone because it lets them keep using their product. Rebuilding community and connection is the thing that helps people grow.
If there are expensive physical units, they'll just setup places you can go use one by the hour, like an internet/gaming cafe or a VR experience place. It'll be like indoor skydiving or Top Golf.
Look, there are lonely girls out there, we all see that. I have been satisfying a few of them consistently recently. It's all very open, I don't hide anything, but I also don't volunteer much information. One girl knows everything, the others don't care I think, because I buy them things too.
Girls aren't going to "date" robots. Robots don't have money.
Maybe im sarcastic and defensive because people like you. Maybe my self-doubt and criticism is translated or transfered into a situation someone could take advantage of MYtransition from 1 thing into another thing... can you imagine 1 thing randomly evolving into something different? Like a male dog suddenly realizing it is actually a female dog, but born in the wrong dog body? I say this in a joyful fun loving spirit. I dont mean to make anyone feel bad.
199 Comments
okwhateverdude@lemmy.world · 136 pts · 326d
ITT, people that don't check the date
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 77 pts · 326d
One of the rare posts that would benefit from an obnoxious red circle.
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 325d
ITT technical institute
okwhateverdude@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 325d
Gonna guess you're old af and watched those shitty ads as a kid staying home sick and watching daytime TV
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 325d
Lmao indeed I am, I’m 46.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
How would you know all those details unless you experienced it too?
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 88 pts · 326d
It's 2025. You can automate a sex machine from clear across the world to fuck someone with a giant direwolf dick dildo to the beat of your favorite song as you stream it live while having your morning coffee and wait for your first work conference call.
Or so I'm told... or something.
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 326d
Absolutely. Those vibrator things with antenna poking out of whatever hole allow for the patterns and such to be controlled by whoever if you allow, and be controlled by trapping or holding your screen.
Or so I know... For reasons
oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 326d
Oh I have one of those.. for research purposes
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 326d
Don't you just fucking love doing research? Like why aren't more people not doing research?
30p87@feddit.org · 7 pts · 325d
https://buttplug.io/, for the interested
whoisearth@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 325d
Which beggars the question. For men, sex is at varying degrees about power hence your anecdote and the website to back that up as a viable business model. I doubt sex is about power to women though. I'm more curious so just rambling.
ieGod@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 325d
🧐
RedIce25@lemmy.world · 59 pts · 326d
Well we already have sex machines, I don't know how different a robot would be
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 45 pts · 326d
People mistake "robot" for "android" all the time. There's plenty of sex toys that have qualified as a robot even back when the OP was brand new.
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 326d
Some call me The Sex Machine. It's a backhanded nickname though.
hypnicjerk@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 326d
because you're a sloppy lover?
mushroommunk@lemmy.today · 16 pts · 326d
Because people have to spend more time maintaining The Sex Machine then using it
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 326d
Because they always run out of batteries before the deed is done
dev_null@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 326d
So, the article was right?
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 39 pts · 326d
The STDs caught from robosex are gonna be gnar. Some kid in another country'll upload a virus that hijacks your dick. Gonna need a trojan to protect against trojans.
Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 326d
Like Electro Gonarhea: the Noisy Killer.
AtariDump@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
Thhheeeeee Space Pope
slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org · 5 pts · 326d
I watched enough Xavier renegade angel to know exactly what to do
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 326d
Would it really be a bad thing? May the incels will get laid and move on. Maybe the guy who gets rejected will go home and fuck his bot instead of stalking the girl who rejected him. And maybe girls won't have to take it in the ass even though they don't really want to, but feel like they have to. They can say, just fuck the bot in the ass. Marriage rates will probably decline, and so will total divorces after a while. Which means less kids raised in split or single households. Plenty of good "could" cum from this.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 326d
Yeah but can a sex bot piss in my mouth while sucking my dick while I yell "but mommy I don't like apple juice"?
BoosBeau@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 326d
What a horrible day to be literate.
rovingnothing29@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 326d
Probably of you mod it right
RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 325d
ಠ_ಠ
Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 325d
Shoot, with the right mods, you can do all that and replace all the piss with champagne.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 325d
Gross. Champagne. Ee.
LePoisson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
When these sex bots come out you're gonna have to get a top of the line edition to do all that.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
Of course
blargh513@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 326d
You just HAD to wait until the end, didn't you?
fartographer@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 326d
Keeping you on edge?
blargh513@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 326d
Stop that.
edgemaster72@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 325d
Then start again. And stop. Then go slowly. Stop again...
blargh513@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 325d
MOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMM! THEY'RE MAKIN DIRTY JOKES AND I DON LIKE EM!!!!!!
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 326d
All those things could be more readily solved by just legalizing and de-stigmatizing sex work. AI sex bots actively harm that industry by taking work away from humans, just like how a hypothetical AI acting bot would harm the acting industry.
P1k1e@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 326d
I mean your right, but if I were to guess which is more likely, sex bots takes the win.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 326d
Sure, I was just pushing back on the "wouldn't AI sex bots be good actually" take
Nolvamia@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 325d
Get yer pitchforks! They're a'coming for our blowjerbs!
blarghly@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 326d
The work could be done cheaper by robots, presumably. And sure, I'm all for legalized sex work. But if a machine can do it better, faster, and cheaper - why not? Fleshlights exist - are you opposed to those because they take work from sex workers? Ludditism always fails - if human sex workers are still around after we have fully functioning sex bots, it is because they can provide something the bots can't. And I think this will be the case - at the end of the day, we know on a deep level that there is a difference between fucking a bot and fucking a real human.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 325d
Just because we can automate something, doesn't mean we should. At least not until we live in a moneyless society.
blarghly@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 325d
You're really setting yourself up for disappointment here. You've created a dichotomy - either we should avoid automating things which can be automated (which isn't going to happen - consumers like low prices and shareholders like higher profits), or we should transition to a moneyless society (which is also not going to happen, money is useful and everyone likes it).
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 325d
I think I'll be ok, but thanks for your concern
lovely_reader@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
But not necessarily because they were wrong.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 325d
Morally? I don't think there is a moral component here. It's like saying earthquakes are morally wrong. Technological innovation happens when its time comes, and trying to stop it is akin to trying to stop an earthquake. Sure, you can choose not to use the tech if you don't want to, but others will. You can form comminities which agree not to use the tech (like the Amish), but those outsude your communities will use the tech. You might even get your government to ban the tech - but then you end up with the war on drugs, or south america style inflation, or North Korean levels of policing.
If you want to wax poetic about the wonderful work of hand-weaving textiles, be my guest. But I will very happyly wear a machine-woven shirt for a fraction of the cost so that I can spend my money on something else that I value more.
lovely_reader@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
No, not morally. What? The Luddites have not always been wrong about the adoption of a particular technology ultimately being a net negative on society/individuals/humanity. Citing their "failure" as a reason to blindly champion any use of technology is kind of weird.
Luddites "fail" to hold back technology insofar as many technologies are indeed adopted, but that doesn't mean their message of temperance has never had any effect on how technology is adopted, or that all technologies have improved life on Earth. And of course not all technology has taken off. Yes, it's hard to stop a moving train once an idea is getting popular, but we all get to choose whether to climb aboard. I wonder why it seems to ruffle your feathers to hear from people who don't.
tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 326d
you're right, but consider: unless we're going even farther down the subscription shithole, a sexbot would be a one time purchase.
KuroiKaze@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 326d
They are definitely going to make the personality updates and features all subscription based.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 326d
I've heard far too many stories about how ChatGPT inflames the narcissistic tendencies of the people who use it and turns them into unbearable assholes. I can't imagine how adding a pocketpussy or vibrator to the device will improve things.
shalafi@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 326d
Still won't address emotional needs, whether those needs be healthy or unhealthy. If a robot could actually satisfy, why doesn't jacking off work as well as actually getting laid? Same difference with a bot.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
Jacking off isn't the same. But can a robot satisfy... well that we don't know really. Maybe it can, maybe it can't. I was going on the assumption that it could for this conversation.
blarghly@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 326d
Doubtful - these actions are driven by emotions, not the need to get off. If it were the latter, they could just jerk off at home today and they wouldnt do these things.
They can currently just say "no"... I'm not sure why we need sex bots to save us from being bad at communicating.
Again, doubt. If you are getting married for the sake of having sex, then you are probably in some kind of restrictive religion. And these religions will probably tell you that fucking a bot is an abomination. If you aren't, then you'll marry for the same reasons people marry today, and marriage and divorce will stay at about the same rate.
LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 326d
Why do people do this, just pull apart someone's comment, dismiss and disregard everything they say. No questions. Just, bam bam bam, you're wrong on all counts, because my opinion thinks you are wrong and my opinion is somehow more valid than yours. Do you talk to people like this irl. Wtf.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
Do you not? Someone says something that sounds likely false. So I say "I don't think that is true". And then we can discuss whether or not it is likely true.
LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 323d
Those are opinions, not facts. Opinions are not facts. That's just what you think and feel, relevant only to you. Your opinion doesn't shoot someone else's opinion down, if they differ, that just means you disagree. If you disagree with someone, you come off douchey af if you try and tell them they're wrong, because you have a different opinion. You are better off (as in you come across less douchey) if you just ask people about their opinions, if they differ to yours, because, that expands your ability to understand more about the world. If you stay in your own little echo chamber, and never step outside your comfort zone, your mind stays small.
But to answer your other question, I would not say "that sounds likely false" to someone, that instantly puts you on the defensive and I actually want to know, if someone has different information than me, or has formed a different opinion, I want to know why. If I know they're definitely wrong, I ask questions that lead them to the conclusion, without having to say, you've been duped by propaganda, because if they aren't capable of coming to that conclusion on their own, they won't take it from me in another way, anyway. People don't respond well to being told, straight up, they're wrong, that's not a way to discuss, and it doesn't work to help people change their minds.
Sanctus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
You can't separate the two. It doesnt work like that. The need to get off is intertwined with multiple emotions. Plus if the bot could talk back to you it would change the equation as you can't go home and talk to your dick and have an actual conversation. This anthropomorphic quality would change the outcome of the thought pattern.
Thats just "what were you wearing" dressed up different. Saying no can be hard, especially for teenagers who want to fit in. It can become easier when there is a clear and painless alternative to suggest.
A lot of people are getting marries for the wrong reasons, divorce rates are extremely high. This probably would stop at least a noticeable percentage of people from getting married with hormones blazing.
All of this is just speculation, but I dont think the results of unleashing sex bots are as clear cut as you suggest.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
You don't seem to understand the role sexual desire plays in the decisions people make. And I am going to assume you aren't male. Cause jerking off is simply not the same as sex.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
I'm confused why you think that, and don't think you understand the point I was making. Would you please elaborate?
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
For starters, jerking off and having sex are not equal. Next you think straight up saying no to a sexual desire is the same as redirection. Last, you don't think the desire to get laid is a driver for guys dating girls which eventually leads to marrying them. There are exceptions, but sexual desire is the first thing to drive most men to date. They my find other value later, but that won't matter if they don't start.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
I agree. My point is that having sex with a robot is more akin to jerking off than having sex with a human. Like I said, fleshlights exist. Sex dolls exist. A sex robot would simply be another iteration.
I think people should just say no to things they don't want to do.
Again, I think putting your dick in a robot is more akin to jerking off. Hence the rate of marriage and divorce not changing. People will continue getting married for dumb reasons. They will just be the same dumb reasons as before.
Also, btw, I'm a heterosexual man with a high sex drive.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 323d
Your using what sex with s robot would be right now. The post is talking about in ten years. Ten years from now it will be drastically different than a fleshlight or current sex dolls. I would expect it would be able to move on it's own, probably enough to get into different positions. It will also probably be able to respond to commands/requests and maybe even physical movements of the user. And of course, AI can already pretend to be a real person with "some" success. Narrowing that scope from conversation to just sex should enable it to perform even better verbally.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 323d
Again, these improved features might make it a more enjoyable experience - but it still won't be sex. The person who owns the robot will know it. It won't scratch the emotional itch that is wanting to have sex - at least not until the AI gains sentience, and has the right and ability to turn you down and/or tell you you just aren't that great in the sack.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 36 pts · 326d
I find it amusing they used a pretty woman for the photo, and not an overweight man with greasy hair and an anime T shirt.
tatann@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 325d
Cause no women, especially pretty ones, would use a sextoy
/s
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 325d
A sex toy, yes. A fuckbot that is shaped like a man, no.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 325d
*shaped like a cold scifi robot with a masculine resembling build
It looks so incapable of emotion why even bother giving it a head, a cushion will do.
tatann@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
I thought someone named buttnugget would be more educated about weird kinks ;)
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 325d
I wish I were. It’s more that women are sexually objectified and that’s why men develop things like sex robots and the like. If men could replace women with something like a fully functional Android, we would. Women are content with a dildo.
tatann@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
You seem to be full of prejudice :/
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 325d
I wish. Then my observations could be corrected with logic and reason instead of themselves being logical and reasonable.
tatann@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 325d
You're talking like a vulcan 🤔 Or a robot 😲
Wait, are you one of these sexbots from the future trying to steal our pretty women !!!
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 325d
This is what we got
LePoisson@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 325d
To be fair that's a pretty legit set up.
Idk if I'd want to take 15 minutes or however long to fucking suit up then deal with the aftermath and taking all that back off.
But if I was forced to masturbate in VR this set up would undoubtedly rock.
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 325d
Hmm I rather shove a dildo up my ass. Which I do btw, with a VR headset on.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 325d
If God didn't intend for man to stick things up his butt. God wouldn't have put mans fun button up his butt.
Check mate atheists.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 324d
Yeah, taking all that robo gear off at the end would kinda anti-climax the twisted thrill he got. Post-nut clarity making him want to bathe in a vat of acid to melt away his shame. The only guy who could really enjoy this is the inventor who will sell & earn millions from it. As for the customers, jokes on them.
LePoisson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 324d
Why should there be any shame to melt away?
I don't think you should be ashamed to enjoy jerking it with nice tech. I could enjoy this but as like a once in awhile thing. I'm not getting suited up every time I spank the monkey.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
robocall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
I see titties, but whats going on below? a dick pounding?
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
Yeah that thing is supposed to go on your penis.
peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
Needs to be smaller.
Noodle07@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
For you maybe
robocall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
I wonder if there's a video of a man using this device without wearing the unitard.
buttnugget@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
Perhaps on a porn website.
robocall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
I tried looking it up, but all I found were women's sex machines.
robocall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
Asking for a friend, where to buy this product?
Fleur_@aussie.zone · 25 pts · 326d
You can buy them if you want. Also vibrators have been pretty widespread for a couple decades now
GladiusB@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 326d
The vibrator was invented before the toaster.
SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 326d
priorities
tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 326d
to be fair at least with Hitachi i'm pretty sure they were invented as actual massagers for construction workers. and then humans did what humans do best
mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 326d
they killed it?! you bastards!
ErrorCode@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 325d
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 12 pts · 325d
You're not my supervisor!
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 325d
Jokes on you I'm into that
beejboytyson@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 325d
Women use vibrators men have a flesh light. We been gucking robots.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 325d
Not really the same. There's a reason most folks don't stick to sex toys and actually go through the effort of finding a partner. Hell, people do that even if they have no intention of forming a long term relationship. One night stands are a thing. For most people, vibrators and flesh lights clearly leave a lot to be desired. They can get you the O, but they lack the intimacy. I would say a robot could never provide that, but people are already falling in love with LLMs. As in, literal romantic love. When they change their models, OpenAI gets death threats from people acting like they just killed the love of their life. Because, well, they kind of did.
We have been using mechanical sex toys, but there is a difference between a simple machine and a robot. Assumedly, a robot could fulfill the intimacy needs of a flesh and blood human, not just facilitate a climax. Sex robots and vibrators will fulfill fundamentally different human needs.
Here's one way to imagine it. Some insecure guys object if a woman uses a toy while she and he are intimate. But what about a robot? Assuming you're a straight male, would you sleep with a girl that insisted that her (male) sex robot joined in? And this thing doesn't just perform basic mechanical stimulation. Imagine all of the words, touches, and caresses you like to use. Imagine all the ways you like to touch a woman while intimate. Imagine all the things you say to her. Imagine it all. Then imagine there's another dude next to you doing all those things and more. And he's better at them than you. He just happens to be a literal machine. If you want to sleep with this girl, you need to let this other guy join in.
Having a robot join in would be like having another human person join in. Sure, if that's your thing, go for it and live your dream. But most people don't live like that and don't want to live like that.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 325d
People also think they're married to the Golden Gate Bridge so.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 325d
As someone who is unbelievably aromantic. A vibe and a silicon stick does it for me. Brain like happy chemicals. Brain no care about attachment.
The biological urge once sated I can return to 20 year old games.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
Sure, but no need to engage in bean soup discourse.
beejboytyson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
Man, the vibrator your friend not your enemy.
Asafum@feddit.nl · 19 pts · 326d
Hmmm.... Now I'm questioning what else Rosie does with that vacuum.
Rooster326@programming.dev · 10 pts · 326d
Oh my
Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 326d
NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 326d
Absolutely fucks your shit up, by the looks of it.
yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 326d
I just started rewatching old school Jetsons. The episode where they introduce Rosie, George takes the cheapest 'homely' model instead of the sexy French maidbot.
mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 325d
Jakule17@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 325d
Friendly reminder that the sun (and a lot of other British, Australian and American news outlets) are owned by a milliarder Rupert Murdoch
answersplease77@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 325d
my wife has been fucking her Hitachi9000 robot since 2015. we bought it from Amazon
Zozano@aussie.zone · 19 pts · 326d
"Why is it white?"
"Oh my god, you can't just ask robots why they're white!"
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 325d
traceur201@piefed.social · 18 pts · 326d
The pinch points on that model 😭
ferrule@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 325d
Una@europe.pub · 18 pts · 326d
Not that far from truth considering many are or were in a romantic relationship with a chat bots. Not exactly sex but close enough.
krashmo@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 326d
That's worse imo. There's no delusion required to rub one out.
Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 326d
Not if you're doing things the boring way.
Pumafred9@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 326d
Will this be compulsory? And how will it affect my marriage?
ozoned@piefed.social · 18 pts · 326d
It's not cheating as long as it's plugged into the wall and the data center is in another zip code.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 326d
Friendly reminder that the conclusion of the movie "HER" was all the AIs hooking up with each other and leaving their weird incel mandatory-SOs behind.
SirBucksworth@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 326d
How does sticking my d*ck in the toaster count?
don@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 326d
If counts if the toaster is a robot.
Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com · 2 pts · 324d
The toaster is so hot
Quill7513@slrpnk.net · 14 pts · 326d
yeah turns out people were more invested in emotional fulfillment than physical pleasure. so instead of fucking elaborate sex toys, people are forming bonds with chatgpt
thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de · 12 pts · 326d
For the long wait?
Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 326d
Bold of you to assume that, of the 8 billion people on earth right now, not a single one has achieved orgasm within the confines of a robotic entity.
pepperjacques@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 326d
edgemaster72@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 325d
In this economy? Not fucking likely.
(was hoping someone would follow up with "Not likely fucking" but it's been a day and nothing 🫤)
Zwiebel@feddit.org · 9 pts · 326d
Why? Can't afford them?
hayvan@feddit.nl · 7 pts · 325d
Maybe They are having sex with robots. They didn't say everyone.
Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 326d
It was a mistranslation. We are getting fucked by robots.
enbee@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 326d
FUCK THE S*N
tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 326d
idk that sounds kinda dangerous
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 326d
Speak for yourselves
TheEEEdiot@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 326d
I'll be having sex with robots in the next 10 years.
Pacattack57@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
10?! Try 1 week
Sergio@piefed.social · 6 pts · 326d
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23268743.2025.2476955
FerretyFever0@fedia.io · 5 pts · 326d
Oh god, New Vegas was right about Fisto. Can't wait for one of these to actually be saying "Assume the position".
ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 325d
Don’t worry, it’s just the readers of The Sun
ozoned@piefed.social · 5 pts · 326d
Thank goodness! Finally these MAGA dipshits can get laid and chill the fuck out!
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 326d
Yeah the incel community might finally get some release.
Codpiece@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 326d
As long as the robots don’t have any standards.
FerretyFever0@fedia.io · 4 pts · 326d
I mean, Google Gemini has "killed" itself SEVERAL times out of feelings of inadequacy. Who's to say that the ais don't eventually get standards accidentally programmed in?
don@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 326d
I strongly doubt that. These are incels. Their primary complaint is that feeeeeeeeemales of the human type won’t just give them whatever sex they want by virtue of the incels taking up space on the planet.
If anything, I’d expect them to revolt further, claiming that this is just an another attempt by the chads hoarding live Stacy vaginas to pacify the blackpilled into not shooting everyone up in “justified” incel fury.
webp@mander.xyz · 5 pts · 326d
When you can't get any with your own species:
fckreddit@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 326d
Well? I am waiting!!
PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 326d
We still have 2 months guys, we must sbeve.
toynbee@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 326d
I don't mean to mock typos or anything, but what is that last word supposed to be? Or rather than a mistake is it some slang I don't know? Thanks in advance.
PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 326d
Well this is just a pretty old meme reference. It just pokes fun at some instagram level motivational lines, where the some parts of the text "She believed" were highlighted showing "He lied", but some people deliberately took the script in the opposite way, so we have got "sbeve" without the highlighted text.
toynbee@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 326d
TIL
I can be old as fuck and still have missed old memes. Thanks for explaining.
makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 326d
Still more lifelike than bangin yo mamma!
lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 326d
Excuse me, but we’re humans and robots, not animals. It’s called making 10ve.
magic_lobster_party@fedia.io · 4 pts · 326d
People are having relationships with robots though.
NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 325d
And the Sun will be there to instil moral panic about it, complete with AI-generated Page 3 girl.
wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 326d
Just give one of those boston dynamics robot dogs with the arm face thing a fleshlight or dildo.
MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 324d
I mean, if you try hard enough, you can do anything...
Harvey656@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 326d
Heavily NSFW, click at your own risk.
::: spoiler spoiler https://www.oksexdoll.com/ai-robot-sex-doll-for-sale.html :::
I mean, I guess this is a good use of ai? But I guess they exist... err... yay? Who buys these?
ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 325d
It's not a very good sex doll, it's just an ok sex doll.
Harvey656@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
I uh... have to ask, have you used one? Have you tested these out? How do you know?
ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 325d
Says it right there in the domain.
Harvey656@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
I'm gonna be honest, that went right over my head lol. I didn't pay alot of attention when I grabbed the link.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 326d
We did get the milking machine for sperm donations. I feel like that covers a lot of ground. I gotta wonder how many rich people have one of them somewhere in their house.
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 326d
You talking "rich" as in "doing pretty well, financially" or "rich" as in "truely wealthy"? Because at some point, I'd imagine that the rich person would just hire a "housekeeper".
jqubed@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 326d
Billionaire Robert Kraft was caught at a low-end “massage parlor” in Florida. It seemed like a slam-dunk case but his lawyers were able to argue that the warrant allowing detectives to place hidden cameras in the rooms didn’t explicitly include recording the videos so the recordings couldn’t be used in court as evidence. Without the recordings of him asking for and receiving sexual services from a potentially trafficked person the prosecutors weren’t able to make a case and he remains a free man, not guilty in the eyes of the law even though what he did became widely known. Still blows my mind that he had the financial resources for any variety of overtly-transactional or less-overtly-transactional-and-perfectly-legal-in-most-jurisdictions relationships with willing participants, yet he chose the really cheap and illegal route with someone who was likely coerced into the action by a third party. Was that part of the appeal?
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 326d
Did you reply to the wrong comment? I only implied that rich people would probably hire a prostitute of some form, rather than buy a sex toy. What does that have to do with the specific type of sex workers that Robert Kraft chose to visit?
jqubed@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 326d
I guess I interpreted your comment to mean they would go for a higher-end arrangement, something more exclusively available to people with large amounts of money, not a cheap arrangement found in an older shopping center.
Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 325d
Saw a sex bot at a expo had a auto sucking feature and AI (not local at the time) that could talk to you. They even breath nowadays and heat up.
Sex bot based on scarelette jo for 50k https://www.marieclaire.com.au/latest-news/scarlett-johansson-robot-sex-doll/
If you got the money probably could have something real good with local AI.
the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 324d
That thing looks nothing like her.
SaraTonin@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 324d
Kinda looks like if she & Emma Watson had a baby. And then that baby became a haunted waxwork.
Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 324d
Lol pretty accurate. Sex doll tech has gone real far since I first heard of it but that's still how I feel about the models in general. Making something look human while being durable/soft seems difficult. Always gives off feeling...
Crashumbc@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 324d
Yeah the tipping point is going to be AI/robot quality and mass production scale/cost.
I wouldn't be surprised to see "robot" clubs at some point...
Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 324d
Seen lots of talk on this topic. Basically concerns on stds are high but that never stopped anyone before. Just hard for a legit business venture. I feel like i read about a dude renting sex doll out.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 324d
Weird that someone with an extra $50k to throw around would choose sex with a robot rather than nurture meaningful human relationships. Or maybe they could do both, because wealthy people can do whatever the fuck they want. But just imagine the mental state of anyone who'd have sex with a robot, they're gonna be a bit fucked-up in the head. Psychotic. Cold. Disassociated.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 324d
That seems a bit extreme. How is it different from a vibrator or a fleshlight
or a RealDoll?Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 324d
From what I read the sexdoll market is mostly divorced men in 50s. So probably dudes just wants something easy from burn out. Human relationships require work and time. Plus no stds or BCs to worry about. In fact the concept of added AI for conversation shows ppl want connections but don't find it. Just ask anyone online dating who is under a 6.
hakkinen@lemmy.org · 3 pts · 324d
better then sheep i guess
peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
I'm having sex with Rob, close enough.
abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 326d
Or we could ya know....connect with people. Promote more social interaction spaces and opportunities so people are less siloed and isolated in their own city/town/neighborhoods/houses.
People say "Oh AI, Oh Incels, Oh women are afraid" yes, but people get better at interacting socially by spending more time interacting socially. A "yes man" chat instance doesn't help anyone learn or grow. And it goes for sex too, you're not gonna get better if every "person" you've been with says you were the best ever and they came 30 times.
AI companies have a vested interest in keeping people alone because it lets them keep using their product. Rebuilding community and connection is the thing that helps people grow.
Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 326d
The post was "in 10 years we're going to" but the post date is 2015, is the joke
Our sex robots do not look like that, they are the bare minimum functionality of put it in or stick it in
SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 324d
If there are expensive physical units, they'll just setup places you can go use one by the hour, like an internet/gaming cafe or a VR experience place. It'll be like indoor skydiving or Top Golf.
treesquid@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 325d
Looks like Joanna Gaines is into robo-schlong
ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 326d
Jestzer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 326d
Check the date in the screenshot.
SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 326d
why do only the bad predictions get fulfilled
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 326d
Hard pass
matlag@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 324d
I'm ready to bet the men worried that women would fuck robots are also jerking off on Tilly Norwood and hope they can create porn videos.
mavu@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 326d
depends entirely on your definition of robot if it came true or not.
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 326d
Where are the japanese when we need them the most ?
TomMasz@piefed.social · 1 pts · 326d
No. Also no in 10 years.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 4 pts · 326d
Ha I didn't, but I did come here to say "they were saying that 10 years ago".
Electricd@lemmybefree.net · 1 pts · 325d
Meh, I wouldn’t care, doesn’t seem bad as long as you’re not going in a real romantic relationship
robocall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 324d
udon@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
"sex"
Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world · -15 pts · 325d
Look, there are lonely girls out there, we all see that. I have been satisfying a few of them consistently recently. It's all very open, I don't hide anything, but I also don't volunteer much information. One girl knows everything, the others don't care I think, because I buy them things too.
Girls aren't going to "date" robots. Robots don't have money.
veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 325d
This is the weirdest misogynistic take I've seen yet, it's got to be a joke.
It's like that joke about women and abortion where I don't like giving women choices, but I also like killing babies.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 324d
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 324d
Seems u/Soktopraegaeawayok is a troll. That's his schtick. How he gets his thrills in his free time.
Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 324d
Maybe im sarcastic and defensive because people like you. Maybe my self-doubt and criticism is translated or transfered into a situation someone could take advantage of MY transition from 1 thing into another thing... can you imagine 1 thing randomly evolving into something different? Like a male dog suddenly realizing it is actually a female dog, but born in the wrong dog body? I say this in a joyful fun loving spirit. I dont mean to make anyone feel bad.
Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 324d
I wish you knew that joke... it sounds funny.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 325d