In 2011 too. That's pre-BLM. I can't think of anything out of the ordinary where white people were getting called out or felt under threat. I think this is just good old fashion, "Momma says" racism.
Although, in both cases, it's the DHS. Why is FEMA part of that? There was, and is obviously, legitimate concern of the DHS being used to oppress people. They were just lied to about who was planning on doing it. Structurally the critique was, at least in part, valid.
As usual, for entirely batshit crazy irrational reasons. These are the same people who prior to 9/11 worried about the "New World Oder" and UN Agenda 21 meaning that French troops in blue helmets would go door to door and take guns away from Americans. If there was a Polymarket back then, how many of these people would have bet their life savings every year on that outcome and been wrong every. single. time. And kept on betting on it year after year.
Then after the Patriot Act created DHS, FEMA became the boogeyman because it would be the conduit for executing emergency powers, and 9/11 was the first national emergency in the lives of most conspiracy nuts. Sort of like how ICE is the specific agency under DHS murdering people, DHS, other than PuppyKiller herself, is largely removed from the day-to-day operations of sub-agencies. I imagine there was also a certain racist stripe of "yes, we want homeland security....from brown people. Keep doing anything you want to them, that's fine." Then the discordant wish to not let FEMA get some Deep State cancer and Obama put all the Good Ol' Boys in camps. Functionally, it makes no sense, but the same people think the President is a King or God, so who fucking knows.
Structurally, there was a basis in fact only so far as "this agency does things during emergencies." Past that, it's all to sell newsletters and books and tacticool powdered eggs. Combined with the fact that any new agency created in the US government immediately gets populated by idiots that wouldn't get promoted if they stayed somewhere else, DHS and FEMA have consistently demonstrated significant ineptitude and being too slow-moving to do much in the way of dealing with an actual emergency. Under DHS, maaaybe CISA and the Coast Guard are/were competent and that's about it. Meaning that anyone seriously fearing conspiracy-style "FEMA camps" for their NWO national roundup would have 6-18 months of lead time to know the camps are being built (poorly by the highest bidder) and maybe never even get done due to cost overruns.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk about Classic Conspiracy Nuts and you.
I mean Epstein and Ghisline were literally Mossad and Israel owns our politicians and still has all the blackmail footage so while the Jew hate isn’t justified Israel is absolutely an extremely powerful villain that has our government occupied. I think too many of the rantings on the right are starting to be connected to threads of truth in the latest file dump. I mean Epstein (a Jewish supremisist) was literally spreading these theories on 4 Chan with Steve Bannon they were Q
1900 Wikipedia (citing historical demographers) states areas populated by European-descent people were 36% of world pop (~594M of 1.65B).
Today (2025, world ~8.2B) No UN global race data exists. Estimates for European-ancestry population: 800M–1.3B (10–16%), with ~8–12% common in stricter counts excluding mixes/immigrants.
Back in 1900, it wasn't just European-descent that lived in Europe either. We were as multicultural back then as we are now. Travel has existed for a long time.
So what if other parts of the world had a bigger population growth? This isn't a competition.
There is only one race you should care about: the HUMAN race.
Everything thing else are variations that aren't relevant.
Your math doesn't check out. It is just racist-baiting and full of backwards thinking.
Back in 1900, it wasn't just European-descent that lived in Europe either. We were as multicultural back then as we are now. Travel has existed for a long time.
Yeah and not all people have 10 fingers. A good indicator that someone is either a moron or trying to intentionally mislead is when they use a small minority to try disprove a generalisation.
So what if other parts of the world had a bigger population growth? This isn't a competition.
So you admit my numbers do hold validity?
There is only one race you should care about: the HUMAN race.
Yeah and I want all member of that race to be treated equally ie no free shit for your identity.
Your math doesn't check out. It is just racist-baiting and full of backwards thinking.
The beautiful part of math is that u can objectively prove things vague claims it doesn't check out without evidence is bullshit.
I don't dislike people for the quantity of melanin in their skin I simply want everyone to be treated equally ie don't give fast paths or free shit to people based on their identity or how they where born.
Sorry my numbers where a litle exaggerated I went and checked and turns out it's ~30% in 1990 and 8-12% today (depending on if u count mixed or not). And I wasn't quoting the only quote was at the end you can tell its a quote by the quotation marks
How is wanting absolute equality (not equity) fascist? All I want is everyone to be treated equally and at the moment its me who's getting the short end of the stick.
Lol no you're not getting the short end of the stick. Yes, DEI shouldn't be a thing in an ideal world, but we don't live in an ideal world and white privilege is still a thing basically anywhere in the world.
Lol no you're not getting the short end of the stick.
I had more I now have less because what I used to have is being reallocated to other people who are less skilled/capable than myself.
Yes, DEI shouldn't be a thing in an ideal world
Glad we agree
but we don't live in an ideal world
So ur idea to fight systemaric bias is to introduce more systematic bias? That's like saying the best way to defeat the systematic bias by the Nazis is to become a fascist regime and send all German citizens to concentration camps. That's fucking insane.
and white privilege is still a thing basically anywhere in the world.
I'm not privileged cos I'm white I'm privileged cos my parents are well off and they got me highly educated, are involved in my life, care about me, love me, and I was born in Australia. None of that has anything to do with the colour of my skin. Unless ur implying that nonwhite people are poor, uneducated, and have unloving parents because of the colour of their skin. That's racist as fuck bro.
No problem addressed by dei is caused by identity. I have no problem with socialised services for those who got unlucky. I have a problem with that being allocated based upon identity.
I think the libertarian way of thinking of liberty applies very effectively here: you should have the liberty to do whatever u want on the condition it does not reduce the net total liberty of society. Giving poor people food, water, housing, education, etc (essentially general necessities to produce productive members of society) does not reduce total net liberty it increases it. Taking an opportunity away from me and giving it to someone else based on the colour of their skin does not increase liberty. The number of opportunities remain the same, it causes less qualified people to have positions despite more qualified alternatives being willing and available. It also has a byproduct of enforcing racist/sexist/homophobic grouping and thinking.
You talk as if DEI has tipped the scales in the other direction because you experienced a few inconveniences, but in reality it's not enough to balance them. You're only talking about what you experience, but you have no thought for others. Which I actually can understand, it's hard to relate to things you don't experience and probably not even see (I don't), but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
I'm getting fucked by dei and immigration both at the hands of billionaires. But your gonna excuse those actions by billionaires because its pushing a narrative you cannot deviate from without being excommunicated from ur little hive mind.
Dei:
Their is a set quantity (with minor variations) of jobs, opportunities, wealth, etc. Those resources should be offered to the person most qualified ie egalitarianism. Dei by definition fails at doing this it reallocates resources from those who are most qualified to other people based on their identity (race, religion, sexuality etc) dei requires and thus enforces racism, sexism, homophobia etc, etc.
Immigration:
Economics 101 outlines the laws of supply demand. Immigration increases the supply of labour and increases the demand on goods and services. Thus the value of labour drops and the value of goods and services increases. The end result of this is lower wages and higher cost of living. This is exactly what u want if you are part of the bourgeois ownership class and the opposite to what everyone else wants.
We have statistics to prove that immigrants commit higher levels of crime and cost more in terms of welfare.
That's not to say I dislike all immigration as we can very easily tell from the statistics that certain classes of immigrants actually commit less crime and contribute more to economic prosperity.
The reason your argument is fascist brainwashing propaganda is because it ignores the hundreds of years of discrimination and disenfranchisement that groups of people have suffered under the racial caste system of settler colonialist capitalism with white working class men acting as the enforcers of oppression. This system was created by the capitalist class but we are all oppressed by this system. The capitalist class wants you to feel anger and rage towards the people below you in the heirarchy and your rage reinforces the oppressive system keeping us all down. What the pedofile parasite capitalist class doesn’t want you to do is punch up so just keep punching down while they rob us blind and steal our future for the pedofile parasite class because it’s a class war and billions are being spent to radicalize young men to uphold their system of oppression on the working class
This is called the great replacement theory it is settler colonialist pseudoscience and it has been debunked by the human genome project. Race is a social construct used by the capitalist class to create a self policing social hierarchy while they continue to siphon all surplus wealth
I recall seeing some long-bearded dude in army fatigues doing "christian" reggae where he sang about public schools turning kids trans, so yeah. Guy had cult leader energy.
I mean I'm kind of curious. It's probably horrible but I would like to see/heat it somehow.
I bought a CD in Edinburgh from a guy who was part of a particular eastern religion, he called it 'monk rock'. It was not terrible, but worth it for the story.
If I remember rightly in the UK in the 70s there was a subculture called Skinheads. It was similar to early Punk with big boots and leather jackets but having a shaved head was a big part of it. So was reggae music. They loved the reggae.
Gradually, however, Skinhead culture became political in a way that has nothing to do with reggae music. Before long Skinheads were violent white supremacists.
Point is I assume at some stage in that transition there must have been Skinheads that were far enough along politically to be White Nationalists but still retain the original love for the reggae. So I don't think it would be that far fetched to assume some of them might have had a go at making a song or two.
Would it be any good? Probably not.
Will I be looking for it? No.
If it was on the radio right now would I listen to it? Again, no.
But does it exist somewhere out there? I believe it probably does!
SHARPs are Skin Heads Against Racist People. they want to get back to the origins of the skinhead movement, which ironically has its roots in acting in solidarity with Black coworkers on a labor force against racism. back in the late 60s and early 70s, bosses would make their Black employees shave their heads as "a safety measure" either agailst lice or getting caught in factory equipment. meanwhile their white counterparts were allowed to maintain their hairstyles. if you know anything about the history of genocide, you know shaving heads is part of dehumanization. so some white working people started shaving their heads to communicate with their black coworkers "i am you, and you are me. we are human, and we are together"
this became such a common act of labor solidarity that the racist origins of the bosses shaving heads was lost. so by the late 70s you had white people shaving their heads in solidarity with labor, but without any notion that this solidarity extended across racial bounds. it wasn't long after that you see the british Labour party shift from being a leftist party to being a fascist-lite party
Dude is clearly already maxed out on mental impairment. Maybe a joint or two would send him back around to some semblance of critical thinking/insight.
Yeah that is actually a thing. Abba Alabanza, he does songs about “gay propaganda” and “family values” too, and he looks exactly like you think he would.
He records all his music and music videos at his house in Mexico. I wish I was joking.
What an awful day to have eyes and an appreciation for the tonal complexities and poetic structures of reggae. That's like asking for anti-Mexican racist mariachi.
Abba Alabanza, he does songs about “gay propaganda” and “family values” too, and he looks exactly like you think he would.
Without context, I would think that he looks like a Jamaican man. Rastafarianism has fundamentalists, too, and they're just as anti-gay as their Christian counterparts.
How many more times does this guy intend to mention marijuana? For someone who doesn't want to have anything to do with weed, he sure as hell mentions it a lot.
“That’s a gun.” Ralfi said, putting a plump, restraining hand on his boy’s taut blue nylon chest. “Johnny has an antique firearm in his bag.” So much for Edward Bax.
I guess he’d always been Ralfi Something or Other, but he owed his acquired surname to a singular vanity. Built something like an overripe pear, he’d worn the once-famous face of Christian White for twenty years—Christian White of the Aryan Reggae Band. Sony Mao to his generation, and final champion of race rock. I’m a whiz at trivia.
Christian White: classic pop face with a singer’s high-definition muscles, chiseled cheekbones. Angelic in one light, handsomely depraved in another. But Ralfi’s eyes lived behind that face, and they were small and cold and black.
Rastafari are technically zionist -> There is jewish zionist reggae -> The israeli state is controlled by jewish zionists -> The israeli state is a white supremacist project.
Funny how jews were persecuted in white societies for centuries, but now they're suddenly white supremacists. Seems like they always end up being part of the group that's OK to hate.
Israel and Judaism are not synonyms. The nation state of Israel is a European white supremacist project, conceived and launched by the British, that scapegoats Judaism to justify western incursion into the Arab world.
It's crazy that I wrote "Jewish Zionist" specifically to differentiate from "Rastafari Zionist" (Quite different) and the reading comprehension level in this thread had the takeaway that I was being antisemitic. Fucking unreal.
Infinitesunrise is wrong to place the emphasis on the Jewish part and not the Zionist part, but I will say this: in Israel there is economic inequality between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim. Ashkenazim come from Europe and have paler skin. Mizrahim come from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, and often have darker skin. If you compare the income of Ashkenazim and Mizrahim in modern day Israel, Ashkenazim control much of the country's wealth. Which is the same pattern you see in the rest of the world with white privilege.
Now, why does Israel want to compete in Eurovision? Israel isn't in Europe, it's in Asia, so how does that make sense? Well, the big clue is Australia. Australia isn't in Europe either, but it has a very European cultural identity, mainly represented in the fact that it was founded as a racist colonial project and it has a European king. So what Israel is culturally signalling through its investment in competing in Eurovision is "we are culturally European." And we can see that in the fact that Israel is a colonialist state, just like Australia. Israel is performing whiteness. They're trying to tell the western world "we are colonisers like you". And that's why a lot of people object to Israel's participation in Eurovision. Because it's a piece in their plan to colonise Palestine. They're using it to gain political legitimacy and maintain alliances.
So, are Jewish people white? No. But, are there Jewish people who benefit from white privilege and seek to use white privilege to further colonialism? Yes, but not because they're Jewish. It's because they're bourgeois racists.
I wrote jewish zionist only because I had just written rastafari zionist, so needed differentiation. Nothing I wrote was incorrect, but there are so many potentially triggering words in my comment that I think people's brains just took off running without reading carefully. Read my other reply to the comment above, too.
120 Comments
Mac@mander.xyz · 244 pts · 171d
From fucking what?
CaptDust@sh.itjust.works · 193 pts · 171d
rain_worl@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 165d
alt: image has two parts. left: someone with their head under a boot. right: zoom out to reveal that what is in the boot is their own arm
saltesc@lemmy.world · 84 pts · 171d
In 2011 too. That's pre-BLM. I can't think of anything out of the ordinary where white people were getting called out or felt under threat. I think this is just good old fashion, "Momma says" racism.
hansolo@lemmy.today · 74 pts · 171d
During the Obama administration, some honkies felt every day was oppression. The FEMA camp conspiracies were off the chain.
Yet...here we are. Who made the camps now?
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 171d
Something something every accusation is a confession
Cethin@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 169d
Although, in both cases, it's the DHS. Why is FEMA part of that? There was, and is obviously, legitimate concern of the DHS being used to oppress people. They were just lied to about who was planning on doing it. Structurally the critique was, at least in part, valid.
hansolo@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 169d
As usual, for entirely batshit crazy irrational reasons. These are the same people who prior to 9/11 worried about the "New World Oder" and UN Agenda 21 meaning that French troops in blue helmets would go door to door and take guns away from Americans. If there was a Polymarket back then, how many of these people would have bet their life savings every year on that outcome and been wrong every. single. time. And kept on betting on it year after year.
Then after the Patriot Act created DHS, FEMA became the boogeyman because it would be the conduit for executing emergency powers, and 9/11 was the first national emergency in the lives of most conspiracy nuts. Sort of like how ICE is the specific agency under DHS murdering people, DHS, other than PuppyKiller herself, is largely removed from the day-to-day operations of sub-agencies. I imagine there was also a certain racist stripe of "yes, we want homeland security....from brown people. Keep doing anything you want to them, that's fine." Then the discordant wish to not let FEMA get some Deep State cancer and Obama put all the Good Ol' Boys in camps. Functionally, it makes no sense, but the same people think the President is a King or God, so who fucking knows.
Structurally, there was a basis in fact only so far as "this agency does things during emergencies." Past that, it's all to sell newsletters and books and tacticool powdered eggs. Combined with the fact that any new agency created in the US government immediately gets populated by idiots that wouldn't get promoted if they stayed somewhere else, DHS and FEMA have consistently demonstrated significant ineptitude and being too slow-moving to do much in the way of dealing with an actual emergency. Under DHS, maaaybe CISA and the Coast Guard are/were competent and that's about it. Meaning that anyone seriously fearing conspiracy-style "FEMA camps" for their NWO national roundup would have 6-18 months of lead time to know the camps are being built (poorly by the highest bidder) and maybe never even get done due to cost overruns.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk about Classic Conspiracy Nuts and you.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
And these idiots are cheering on the concentration camps and secret police force
Fizz@lemmy.nz · 16 pts · 170d
I think in those days white nationalists were obsessed with Jews controlling them and changing their weather
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
I mean Epstein and Ghisline were literally Mossad and Israel owns our politicians and still has all the blackmail footage so while the Jew hate isn’t justified Israel is absolutely an extremely powerful villain that has our government occupied. I think too many of the rantings on the right are starting to be connected to threads of truth in the latest file dump. I mean Epstein (a Jewish supremisist) was literally spreading these theories on 4 Chan with Steve Bannon they were Q
Fizz@lemmy.nz · 1 pts · 169d
I dont believe thats true. People are making up so much shit about Epstein its retarded. But i havent looked into so may be wrong.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d
Well I read several emails where he was definitely on a weird Jewish supremacy trip and calling others Goy and cattle but here’s an article that explains why because I’m short on time https://www.thenerve.news/p/epstein-billionaires-eugenics-project-harvard-academia-john-brockman
echodot@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 170d
It turns out that if they were just overt about it the white nationalists would suddenly not have cared.
ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 171d
Wow, you don't remember the War on Christmas?
4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de · 21 pts · 171d
Maybe he means education? That's my best bet of what would liberate people of such stupidity
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz · 8 pts · 171d
Liberated from education? We could call them liberated retards, or libtards for short.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 171d
Reality?
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
Minorities is probably what they meant.
ammonium@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 170d
Privilege maybe?
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
I'd say reality, but he seems pretty detached already.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 169d
Parents: We're being oppressed! All those non-whites are taking our jobs and causing all the crime
Shitler JR: But uncle jimmy is in prison for diddling kids
Parents: It was the foreigners that drove him to it, god is punishing us for their acts.
Shitler JR: WE WILL BE FREEE
LoremIpsumGenerator@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d
Student debt, mortgages, automobile ammortisation, healthcare expense, alcohol addiction, porn addiction and alot more
DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz · 9 pts · 169d
So from themselves?
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
So basically capitalism that they blame on black people, women and immigrants
GandalftheBlack@feddit.org · 1 pts · 169d
That has nothing to with being white
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -38 pts · 171d
I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 171d
🤣🤣🤣
The world has never been 40% white. The world is not currently 7% white. Is this what PragerU is telling you? 🙄
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -8 pts · 170d
1900 Wikipedia (citing historical demographers) states areas populated by European-descent people were 36% of world pop (~594M of 1.65B).
Today (2025, world ~8.2B) No UN global race data exists. Estimates for European-ancestry population: 800M–1.3B (10–16%), with ~8–12% common in stricter counts excluding mixes/immigrants.
I exaggerated a bit but the math checks out
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 12 pts · 170d
Back in 1900, it wasn't just European-descent that lived in Europe either. We were as multicultural back then as we are now. Travel has existed for a long time.
So what if other parts of the world had a bigger population growth? This isn't a competition.
There is only one race you should care about: the HUMAN race.
Everything thing else are variations that aren't relevant.
Your math doesn't check out. It is just racist-baiting and full of backwards thinking.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -8 pts · 170d
Yeah and not all people have 10 fingers. A good indicator that someone is either a moron or trying to intentionally mislead is when they use a small minority to try disprove a generalisation.
So you admit my numbers do hold validity?
Yeah and I want all member of that race to be treated equally ie no free shit for your identity.
The beautiful part of math is that u can objectively prove things vague claims it doesn't check out without evidence is bullshit.
jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org · 9 pts · 171d
Why don't you just pick yourself up by your bootstraps and not expect us to fix your sorry life for you?
Isn't that the usual conservative view?
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -5 pts · 170d
I told u what happens when a bunch of young angry white men decide to do that.
jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 170d
Then you and your loser friends can rot in jail.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -5 pts · 170d
I don't think u understand what "monopoly on violence means". Why should I have any empathy for you when you want me to rot in jail and die?
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 6 pts · 170d
We don't care about you. You have already shown to not have empathy for people with other melanin contents in their skin.
A normal person adds enough to society that they don't have to pretend like skin colour is something important. You should try it sometime.
Racist are a cancer on the human race that should be cut out with a big knife.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -5 pts · 170d
I don't dislike people for the quantity of melanin in their skin I simply want everyone to be treated equally ie don't give fast paths or free shit to people based on their identity or how they where born.
echodot@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 170d
Well yeah if you just gonna make quotes up I guess anything is true.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -1 pts · 170d
Sorry my numbers where a litle exaggerated I went and checked and turns out it's ~30% in 1990 and 8-12% today (depending on if u count mixed or not). And I wasn't quoting the only quote was at the end you can tell its a quote by the quotation marks
barooboodoo@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 171d
Why are you talking in 3rd person like you're not one of these milquetoast white never gonna do jack shit pussy fascists when we know you are?
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -8 pts · 170d
How is wanting absolute equality (not equity) fascist? All I want is everyone to be treated equally and at the moment its me who's getting the short end of the stick.
ammonium@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 170d
Lol no you're not getting the short end of the stick. Yes, DEI shouldn't be a thing in an ideal world, but we don't live in an ideal world and white privilege is still a thing basically anywhere in the world.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -5 pts · 170d
I had more I now have less because what I used to have is being reallocated to other people who are less skilled/capable than myself.
Glad we agree
So ur idea to fight systemaric bias is to introduce more systematic bias? That's like saying the best way to defeat the systematic bias by the Nazis is to become a fascist regime and send all German citizens to concentration camps. That's fucking insane.
I'm not privileged cos I'm white I'm privileged cos my parents are well off and they got me highly educated, are involved in my life, care about me, love me, and I was born in Australia. None of that has anything to do with the colour of my skin. Unless ur implying that nonwhite people are poor, uneducated, and have unloving parents because of the colour of their skin. That's racist as fuck bro.
No problem addressed by dei is caused by identity. I have no problem with socialised services for those who got unlucky. I have a problem with that being allocated based upon identity.
I think the libertarian way of thinking of liberty applies very effectively here: you should have the liberty to do whatever u want on the condition it does not reduce the net total liberty of society. Giving poor people food, water, housing, education, etc (essentially general necessities to produce productive members of society) does not reduce total net liberty it increases it. Taking an opportunity away from me and giving it to someone else based on the colour of their skin does not increase liberty. The number of opportunities remain the same, it causes less qualified people to have positions despite more qualified alternatives being willing and available. It also has a byproduct of enforcing racist/sexist/homophobic grouping and thinking.
ammonium@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
You talk as if DEI has tipped the scales in the other direction because you experienced a few inconveniences, but in reality it's not enough to balance them. You're only talking about what you experience, but you have no thought for others. Which I actually can understand, it's hard to relate to things you don't experience and probably not even see (I don't), but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org · 7 pts · 170d
If you're getting the short end of the stick, you should be mad at the billionaires who are stealing from you.
But I'm sure you voted for Republicans because they successfully pointed your anger at black and Hispanic people instead.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -8 pts · 170d
I'm getting fucked by dei and immigration both at the hands of billionaires. But your gonna excuse those actions by billionaires because its pushing a narrative you cannot deviate from without being excommunicated from ur little hive mind.
barooboodoo@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 170d
Explain to us how you've been fucked by DEI and immigration, we're all ears.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · -5 pts · 170d
Sure thing.
Dei: Their is a set quantity (with minor variations) of jobs, opportunities, wealth, etc. Those resources should be offered to the person most qualified ie egalitarianism. Dei by definition fails at doing this it reallocates resources from those who are most qualified to other people based on their identity (race, religion, sexuality etc) dei requires and thus enforces racism, sexism, homophobia etc, etc.
Immigration: Economics 101 outlines the laws of supply demand. Immigration increases the supply of labour and increases the demand on goods and services. Thus the value of labour drops and the value of goods and services increases. The end result of this is lower wages and higher cost of living. This is exactly what u want if you are part of the bourgeois ownership class and the opposite to what everyone else wants.
We have statistics to prove that immigrants commit higher levels of crime and cost more in terms of welfare.
That's not to say I dislike all immigration as we can very easily tell from the statistics that certain classes of immigrants actually commit less crime and contribute more to economic prosperity.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
The reason your argument is fascist brainwashing propaganda is because it ignores the hundreds of years of discrimination and disenfranchisement that groups of people have suffered under the racial caste system of settler colonialist capitalism with white working class men acting as the enforcers of oppression. This system was created by the capitalist class but we are all oppressed by this system. The capitalist class wants you to feel anger and rage towards the people below you in the heirarchy and your rage reinforces the oppressive system keeping us all down. What the pedofile parasite capitalist class doesn’t want you to do is punch up so just keep punching down while they rob us blind and steal our future for the pedofile parasite class because it’s a class war and billions are being spent to radicalize young men to uphold their system of oppression on the working class
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 169d
This is called the great replacement theory it is settler colonialist pseudoscience and it has been debunked by the human genome project. Race is a social construct used by the capitalist class to create a self policing social hierarchy while they continue to siphon all surplus wealth
Hadriscus@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 169d
phew that was loaded lmao
deacon@lemmy.world · 66 pts · 170d
That’s polka, no?
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 29 pts · 170d
This is criminally underrated comment
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 170d
Hey leave my polka out of this!
Jk are you think more the angry white boy polka or i am not a nazi polka?
frog_brawler@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 171d
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 169d
It's a actual stormfront post by a member with over a thousand posts, I'm going to rate this one 'Real and Sincere'
frog_brawler@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 169d
iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 171d
HorreC@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
I sneezed and sprayed the window with some of the candy juice in my mouth, so it was tasty........
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 171d
Not cool, using a euphemism for disabled people, friendo. 🥲
iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 171d
TheOneAndOnly@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
Whelp... Now I'm going to have to go listen to Irresponsible Hate Anthem...
Mac@mander.xyz · -15 pts · 171d
What does ableism have to do with Nazis?
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 171d
How do you feel about that Aphex Twin song?
flandish@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
it’s a fantastic track. i like “ventolin” and “come to daddy” better some days.
Mac@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 171d
I'm not familiar.
ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 171d
🎶 Buffalo wing soldiers,
Bigoted MAGAs.
It was the buffalo wing soldiers
In the heartland of America. 🎶
qualia@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
OP hadn't realized that "Ras Trent" (2008) was a parody and wanted more.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 171d
This's got a beat, and they can nod their empty heads to it. 🤌🏼😅😬
saltesc@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 171d
The second paragraph sounds like the local news interviewing a six year-old to get a cute take on legalisation.
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
It sounds like Trump, re-read it in Trumps voice and it sounds exactly like him
rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 171d
Same difference
echodot@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 170d
But it managed to stay on topic the entire time. At no point did it swing off topic to threaten more tariffs.
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
That’s an excellent point
echodot@feddit.uk · 21 pts · 170d
Someone needs to teach this intellectual juggernaut about the use of the comma.
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 170d
He lost that ability when he puffed on a joint once
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 169d
Commas are a jew conspiracy to interrupt our thoughts, they create an opening where the propaganda can sneak in
Schmoo@slrpnk.net · 20 pts · 170d
I recall seeing some long-bearded dude in army fatigues doing "christian" reggae where he sang about public schools turning kids trans, so yeah. Guy had cult leader energy.
Akasazh@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 170d
I mean I'm kind of curious. It's probably horrible but I would like to see/heat it somehow.
I bought a CD in Edinburgh from a guy who was part of a particular eastern religion, he called it 'monk rock'. It was not terrible, but worth it for the story.
Contentedness@lemmy.nz · 18 pts · 171d
If I remember rightly in the UK in the 70s there was a subculture called Skinheads. It was similar to early Punk with big boots and leather jackets but having a shaved head was a big part of it. So was reggae music. They loved the reggae.
Gradually, however, Skinhead culture became political in a way that has nothing to do with reggae music. Before long Skinheads were violent white supremacists.
Point is I assume at some stage in that transition there must have been Skinheads that were far enough along politically to be White Nationalists but still retain the original love for the reggae. So I don't think it would be that far fetched to assume some of them might have had a go at making a song or two.
Would it be any good? Probably not. Will I be looking for it? No. If it was on the radio right now would I listen to it? Again, no. But does it exist somewhere out there? I believe it probably does!
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 171d
From what Ive heard, neo Nazi's coopted the Skin scene, and lots of people are still very angry about it
Hikermick@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 170d
There's a documentary about this on YouTube. The skinheads used to wear sweaters and dance to reggae
Quill7513@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 170d
SHARPs are Skin Heads Against Racist People. they want to get back to the origins of the skinhead movement, which ironically has its roots in acting in solidarity with Black coworkers on a labor force against racism. back in the late 60s and early 70s, bosses would make their Black employees shave their heads as "a safety measure" either agailst lice or getting caught in factory equipment. meanwhile their white counterparts were allowed to maintain their hairstyles. if you know anything about the history of genocide, you know shaving heads is part of dehumanization. so some white working people started shaving their heads to communicate with their black coworkers "i am you, and you are me. we are human, and we are together"
this became such a common act of labor solidarity that the racist origins of the bosses shaving heads was lost. so by the late 70s you had white people shaving their heads in solidarity with labor, but without any notion that this solidarity extended across racial bounds. it wasn't long after that you see the british Labour party shift from being a leftist party to being a fascist-lite party
HorreC@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
yeah thats where the red laces or suspenders came from. Still some skins around that are true to the old way, but its not really known in popculture.
KeenFlame@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 171d
Or did they naturally recline
Denjin@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 171d
Have you seen This Is England?
axexrx@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
Did they ever do skinhead ska?
night_petal@piefed.social · 1 pts · 170d
This why skinheads aren't allowed in Mohawk Town.
crazycraw@crazypeople.online · 16 pts · 171d
that whole second fucking paragraph fuuuuck this lowlife judgmental reefer madness fucking jellyfish gimp.
ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 171d
"something that causes mental impairment"
Dude is clearly already maxed out on mental impairment. Maybe a joint or two would send him back around to some semblance of critical thinking/insight.
GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 171d
Stack underflow.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 171d
ohshit. 🤣 yoink
Keilik@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 171d
Yeah that is actually a thing. Abba Alabanza, he does songs about “gay propaganda” and “family values” too, and he looks exactly like you think he would.
He records all his music and music videos at his house in Mexico. I wish I was joking.
GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 171d
What an awful day to have eyes and an appreciation for the tonal complexities and poetic structures of reggae. That's like asking for anti-Mexican racist mariachi.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 170d
Without context, I would think that he looks like a Jamaican man. Rastafarianism has fundamentalists, too, and they're just as anti-gay as their Christian counterparts.
just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 171d
TIL
BigMike@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 170d
This image is so old that forums were still relevant when this was posted
LoremIpsumGenerator@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 169d
Ah yes, 100% American right there.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
This guy does white nationalist reggae. It’s about as cringey as you can imagine https://www.reddit.com/r/crappymusic/s/Fx5urSmcdW
Inucune@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
Don't even give these people air.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 169d
The Reddit comments are pretty hilarious
Denjin@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 171d
I Shot the Sheriff (a smile as he murdered an innocent bystander)
P1k1e@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 169d
This guy thinks weed can Impair him furthur
macke49@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 169d
Is it something like this. F... rich Skater kid:
Saryn@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 170d
Looks like bait
NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 170d
German. Death. Reggae.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 170d
Tiger666@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 169d
Who are black people trying to liberate themselves from?
Please can someone think of the poor oppressed white people in the world. /s
ulterno@programming.dev · 4 pts · 170d
Looks like he's speaking from first hand experience.
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 170d
Billybob Macleyleigh - I feel oppressed in my own country because I fall for blatant propaganda, please cry for me
selokichtli@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 169d
At that point they can smoke all the weed they want if those are their woes. Chipotle will be fine without you.
Tattorack@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d
How many more times does this guy intend to mention marijuana? For someone who doesn't want to have anything to do with weed, he sure as hell mentions it a lot.
XTL@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 160d
By the propaganda term, of course.
FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 171d
so, does it?
FE80@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 170d
“That’s a gun.” Ralfi said, putting a plump, restraining hand on his boy’s taut blue nylon chest. “Johnny has an antique firearm in his bag.” So much for Edward Bax. I guess he’d always been Ralfi Something or Other, but he owed his acquired surname to a singular vanity. Built something like an overripe pear, he’d worn the once-famous face of Christian White for twenty years—Christian White of the Aryan Reggae Band. Sony Mao to his generation, and final champion of race rock. I’m a whiz at trivia. Christian White: classic pop face with a singer’s high-definition muscles, chiseled cheekbones. Angelic in one light, handsomely depraved in another. But Ralfi’s eyes lived behind that face, and they were small and cold and black.
trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 170d
OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 170d
No Doubt.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net · -5 pts · 171d
Rastafari are technically zionist -> There is jewish zionist reggae -> The israeli state is controlled by jewish zionists -> The israeli state is a white supremacist project.
So uh... Yes?
mech@feddit.org · 3 pts · 171d
Funny how jews were persecuted in white societies for centuries, but now they're suddenly white supremacists. Seems like they always end up being part of the group that's OK to hate.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 170d
Israel and Judaism are not synonyms. The nation state of Israel is a European white supremacist project, conceived and launched by the British, that scapegoats Judaism to justify western incursion into the Arab world.
It's crazy that I wrote "Jewish Zionist" specifically to differentiate from "Rastafari Zionist" (Quite different) and the reading comprehension level in this thread had the takeaway that I was being antisemitic. Fucking unreal.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net · 2 pts · 170d
Infinitesunrise is wrong to place the emphasis on the Jewish part and not the Zionist part, but I will say this: in Israel there is economic inequality between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim. Ashkenazim come from Europe and have paler skin. Mizrahim come from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, and often have darker skin. If you compare the income of Ashkenazim and Mizrahim in modern day Israel, Ashkenazim control much of the country's wealth. Which is the same pattern you see in the rest of the world with white privilege.
Now, why does Israel want to compete in Eurovision? Israel isn't in Europe, it's in Asia, so how does that make sense? Well, the big clue is Australia. Australia isn't in Europe either, but it has a very European cultural identity, mainly represented in the fact that it was founded as a racist colonial project and it has a European king. So what Israel is culturally signalling through its investment in competing in Eurovision is "we are culturally European." And we can see that in the fact that Israel is a colonialist state, just like Australia. Israel is performing whiteness. They're trying to tell the western world "we are colonisers like you". And that's why a lot of people object to Israel's participation in Eurovision. Because it's a piece in their plan to colonise Palestine. They're using it to gain political legitimacy and maintain alliances.
So, are Jewish people white? No. But, are there Jewish people who benefit from white privilege and seek to use white privilege to further colonialism? Yes, but not because they're Jewish. It's because they're bourgeois racists.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net · 0 pts · 170d
I wrote jewish zionist only because I had just written rastafari zionist, so needed differentiation. Nothing I wrote was incorrect, but there are so many potentially triggering words in my comment that I think people's brains just took off running without reading carefully. Read my other reply to the comment above, too.