The announcement follows Newsom’s 2024 executive order, which directed encampment cleanups after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling granted state and local governments more authority to remove them.
Newsom launches statewide task force to clear homeless encampments
https://ktla.com/news/california/newsom-launches-statewide-task-force-to-clear-homeless-encampments/
206 Comments
CaptDust@sh.itjust.works · 169 pts · 343d
Dude's really method acting his trump "parody" isn't he.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 60 pts · 343d
Maybe he can send trans people to gulags too. After all, Newsom's message seems to be "Hey, I heard you like fascists... vote for me! I can do a fascism too!"
Experience has shown that trying to out-fascist the fascists always works really well for centrists. Anything but the compassionate, progressive politics people desperately want.
Pupscent@lemmy.ca · -5 pts · 342d
Trump has started going after the homeless. I can see Newsome taking action to keep Trump from declaring it an issue in California and sending in the National Guard and or the military. This may be a preemptive measure to address some radical moves by the current federal administration.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 342d
He was going after the homeless before trump took office.
frunch@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 342d
But but but maybe it was just a preemptive strike?!? 😬
CaptDust@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 342d
Yeah definitely wouldn't want the marines and national guard going to California. Is this sarcasm?
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world · 89 pts · 343d
And where do you plan to have them go? Because they have to go somewhere. Perhaps instead of fighting a symptom you treat the cause. Like a complete lack of affordable housing. And things like corporations and hedge funds hoarding single family homes that sit empty, often not even on the market because they're treating them as appreciating assets not homes.
j_elgato@leminal.space · 29 pts · 342d
In order to actually address the homeless crisis, we would first have to fix U.S. Healthcare.
Or we could leave everything broken, with the wealth still being transferred upwards, and keep funneling the people that have been ground up and spit out into our growing for-profit prison industry...
Slwh47696@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 342d
I live in Canada, we have universal healthcare and we still have a huge homelessness problem. Its because everything is so fucking expensive now and there is pretty much zero support for mentally ill people or drug addicts. I live in a relatively small town and we even have a few homeless camps around. The police will raid them and make them move all their shit out every once in a while, but then they just come back again, they have nowhere to go
Also not disagreeing that the US needs to fix it's healthcare
frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 342d
The fix is multifaceted I feel, everything you said is spot on for the issues.
I feel a fix requires Universal Basic Income and Housing, along with mental health support. A minimum level of support would at least help a lot of these people to be able to get off the ground or at least live with a modicum of dignity.
Universal Healthcare would help at least with health issues that people out on the streets face.
Gigasser@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 342d
Create a national jobs force/program, like the old Civilian Conservation Corps. Which can be organized and deployed to various US infrastructure projects, like building high speed rail. Offer some universal basic income along with their jobs. And offer housing as well.
frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 341d
I agree, having that and high taxes on the wealthy were part of the reason the US had such high levels of prosperity for the average citizen back in the olden days. The whole country should be getting connected via high speed rails, I feel. It would open up jobs for people living in more rural areas as well.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
It's too bad that neither party is interested in doing so.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 342d
2 seperate things. housing would have immediate benefit than, something like healthcare reform. not to mention all the laws around rent control, zoning laws and nimbys.
MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 341d
Just housing them is really damn effective in my experience. They recently opened a pallet shelter "village" in my area. Since, I basically never see encampments, and the number of visibly unhoused folks has dropped a lot (since they just look like everybody else due to regular access to hygiene facilities). According to the cops, they've had zero calls out to the village.
We should still do all the other things, but just put up a ton of free basic housing and you can make enormous visual progress.
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca · 27 pts · 342d
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 342d
The vast majority of Californian homeless people become homeless in California. Some people do come here from out of state, but it’s around 10% of the total homeless population. 75% of homeless Californians even live in the same county they became homeless in.
California doesn’t have a ton of homeless people because everyone else is bussing homeless people here, it’s because it’s expensive as fuck (both rent and home prices).
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 342d
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 342d
I… literally linked to it. The article is about the study those numbers come from.
Taldan@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 338d
Texas has actually started reforming zoning laws to allow for more housing, as much of a shithole as that state can be otherwise
Housing is an area that California has absolutely failed on, and it doesn't look like Newsome will do anything to fix it
Reform zoning laws. Allow more dense housing to be built. Once housing is fixed, homelessness will follow suit
sartalon@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 342d
I loved that they let a ton of people out of jail when they legalized marijuana and vacated a ton of convictions.
But then they literally just turned people out on the street with zero fucking pathways. No money, no home, no phone, just zero fucking resources.
It was an almost overnight explosion of homelessness in San Diego.
Sure they have always had a homeless population (the weather is particularly ideal for living outside most of the year), but nothing like it turned in to.
Clearing camps won't help. Like you said, you need to solve the root problem.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 342d
they Did that in sf, during the ASEAN conference in '23, and they came RIGHT back immediately. Its just PR for newsom. once newsome"im making fun of trump" news dies down, he will probably going back to not caring.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 343d
A large amount of destitution is caused by people being bankrupted by medical bills.
The other big causes are untreated mental illness and addiction.
Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 342d
And a lot of addiction is caused by underlying mental illness.
The root cause of almost all these problems is healthcare.
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 342d
And unaffordable housing, unfair wages, lack of worker rights,lack of opportunity, prohibitively expensive education, racism and sexism in the union trades, debt based everything, cost of living hikes and living in a dystopia in general
King3d@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 342d
There are quite a lot of unhoused people who would rather remain homeless. From the conversations I’ve had, it’s not always just circumstances beyond their control. Some have had negative experiences with shelters or social services, and many feel more freedom living outside the system than being tied to its rules and restrictions. It’s not the case for everyone, but for some, homelessness is a conscious choice rather than only the result of hardship.
frongt@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 342d
"If they would rather die, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population!" --Newsom, probably
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 342d
i heard about that, surprise people dont discuss it more. some willingly are homeless, because wouldnt need to pay rent, or taxes, and if they get sick, they can just go to the hospital and not get charged for it.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 342d
i think nimbyism is more a problem in california, than the other 2 things. I remember a nimby group(white people) threw a huge fit over in norcal like 1-2 years ago. of a building/center being built. and then its zoning laws.
j_roby@slrpnk.net · 86 pts · 343d
Encampment sweeps kill.
https://www.propublica.org/article/portland-homeless-deaths-multnomah-county
Kyrgizion@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 343d
They know. It's the actual goal, not an unfortunate fluke of the system.
nickiwest@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 342d
How is a city spending $200k per homeless resident and still not providing them with housing?
That's more than 8 years' worth of rent/mortgage at $2k per month. And even longer in a more reasonably-priced home.
I understand there are more expenses than just rent, but I also understand that it's nearly impossible to get a job if you don't have a permanent residence. If we've got a homelessness crisis that includes working families, why wouldn't the states want to help those families?
A rent/mortgage assistance program seems like it would do a lot more long-term good than simply "cleaning up" encampments.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 342d
nimbyism, probably preventing them from building affordable housing.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 343d
YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub · 76 pts · 343d
Fuck Gavin Newsom. The dude is scum. All the people blowing him are the worst
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 57 pts · 343d
Where did all the newsom stans go?
EDIT: the number of downvotes is the number of people who agree with performative cruelty to homeless people.
SailorFuzz@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 342d
nobody likes Newsome, but in contrast to the rest of the Dems.... he's actually effective at getting under the GOPs skin. That's the whole thing.
GOP doesn't give a shit about Jefferies yapping on the floor for hours. They don't care about another "strongly worded letter" from Schumer. And everyone, EVERYONE, hates Pelosi....
Yes, we all want more people like Mamdani. His policies are everything that I want, that most of us want. But you'd also have to be politically ignorant to not realize that his platform is on shakey ground nationwide. You can do something like Mamdani in a blue stronghold like NY. But across the nation? At this moment in time? No chance, you might as well just hand GOP the keys to power ad infinitium.
I don't like Newsome, but I'm not trying to throw the whole country in the toilet waiting for the world to come around to Mamdani. Playing this "all or nothing" game is getting real people killed and lives ruined.
missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de · 13 pts · 342d
if Progressives are supposed to vote blue no matter who, then Centrists can too. If someone like Mamdani beats Newsom in the 2028 primary they can suck it up and vote for him.
I've swallowed loads the past three elections, it's their turn to take one for the team.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 342d
"blue no matter who" has always been a cudgel used by "party unity my ass" types.
PugJesus@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 342d
They should. But like the many left-abstainers in 2024, it remains to be seen if they will.
If someone like Mamdani runs in the 2028 primary (Mamdani himself being sadly ineligible), they will have my general and primary vote. God forbid a shithead neolib like Newsom gets through.
But 'Blue No Matter Who' is an expression of desperation against the fascists in the GOP, not a magic formula, as much as we wish it was.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 342d
followed by 4 paragraphs of "you are going to vote newsom and love it"
If no one likes him, he's not gonna win. But let's face it. Winning isn't the point. Making sure no progressive is able to run is the point. And you'll campaign for someone you claim to hate in order to make sure that happens.
zbyte64@awful.systems · 5 pts · 342d
As long as cynicism is the logic for choosing candidates, we are never going to see real leaders at the helm of the party. But yeah, let's continue to not have faith voters can do better because the alternative sounds exhausting.
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 342d
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
You're seriously comparing newsom to Lincoln?
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip · -2 pts · 341d
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 341d
Sounds to me like you're saying that anything newsom does that was acceptable in the 1860s is perfectly fine.
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip · -2 pts · 341d
hatorade@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 342d
The DNC hasn't run it's bots up yet today /j
Pacattack57@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 342d
Is this the part where you tell us he’s a corpo shill and I should vote third party in protest?
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 342d
Can always count on centrists to conflate criticism and disloyalty in the worst faith possible.
Assassassin@lemmy.world · 57 pts · 343d
Newsome is such a two faced piece of shit.
humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su · 3 pts · 341d
Socially liberal ✅
Fiscally conservative ✅
scintilla@crust.piefed.social · 1 pts · 341d
He's not socially liberal though. He's socially center at best.
SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml · 52 pts · 343d
While many people believe that substance use, mental illness, or other individual factors are the main drivers of homelessness, extensive research shows that rising housing costs drive more people into homelessness than any other cause.
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/we-can-end-homelessness-in-america
Saleh@feddit.org · 22 pts · 343d
Even if the reasons where mainly substance use and mental illness, those are still societal issues that require societal solutions through better health care access and overall more social security.
It is wild to me that in America "Oh you have a mental illness? Well go die then and don't leave your corpse for me to see!" is somehow a position that is considered acceptable among "progressives". It is deeply reactionary and a hallmark of fascists.
rozodru@piefed.social · 21 pts · 342d
I'm in Canada, Toronto specifically and the Homeless situation here is just as bad as it is in the US. I do volunteer work for a couple homeless outreach programs and I'd say easily since the pandemic the homeless demographic has drastically changed.
The stereotype that homeless people are junkies or mentally ill has shattered. The people I'm working with now are, for now, mentally fit and sober. More women than ever, more elderly, more minorities that in the past generally didn't have many homeless within them because their communities would help prevent them from being homeless i.e. Asians, Muslims, etc
So. Many. Have jobs. So many have families, children, and they are sleeping rough so that they can simply afford to have their kids or older parents or other family members continue to live with whatever roof they can afford over their heads. There are SO many that are sleeping rough because there is simply no room for them to sleep in the tiny studio apartment they can barely afford with their kids, wives, parents, whatever.
I'm handing out food to people who dont' even look homeless. They can't afford to BUY FOOD. All their money goes to rent or other important bills. I'm dealing with people who were on drugs and alchol who then got sober in hopes to get off the streets and find work only to relapse because there is no work or what work they can get isn't anywhere near enough to get them off the streets so they slump RIGHT BACK into that hole because, and they've told me first hand, "There's no point."
Lines are getting longer every month, The portions for food and other things we hand out are getting smaller because NO ONE can afford to donate ANYTHING anymore anywhere near the amount we need to cover the increasingly rising population we're working with.
And none of the politicians could give a flying fuck. None of them. Regardless of what side of the fence they're on and how far away from said fence they are. We could have fixed this years ago, decades ago, but we chose profits over people. We made this bed a long time ago, It's almost your turn to get into it.
For us volunteers this is no longer a battle we're fighting in hopes of winning. No, at this point we've lost. Now we're just hoping we have enough bandages to slow the bleeding as much as possible before we run out.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 342d
They like it this way.
MyOpinion@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 342d
Housing needs to be a right.
roguetrick@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 343d
Behold the sparkle of champagne.
The crime rate's gone, feel free again.
Oh, life's a breeze with you, Miss Lily White.
Taylor Swifts on the screen today.
Convinced the liberals it's okay.
So let's get dressed to dance away the night.
While they kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor tonight.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor tonight.
Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 343d
Guys, I found Jello Biafra's Lemmy account.
roguetrick@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 343d
I wouldn't be surprised if he had one.
FoxyFerengi@startrek.website · 37 pts · 343d
I was speaking with an older lady about who could be as energizing for the left as Bernie for the next election, I said AOC and maybe Jasmine Crockett on the same ticket. (which is a pipe dream, I'm sure)
Anyway, she said Gavin Newsom, and didn't believe me when I said he's a centrist. And I couldn't understand why she even felt he's a leftist. He must have some good pr somewhere that I'm not looking lol
roguetrick@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 343d
There's plenty of left leaning Americans who think Doug Ford is a good guy because he says shit about Trump. It shouldn't be surprising.
FoxyFerengi@startrek.website · 11 pts · 343d
To be fair, most Americans don't pay any attention to Canadian politics (or any other country tbh). So Doug's jacked up policies go in one ear and out the other because they very broadly don't affect Americans.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 343d
Can't really blame Americans for not knowing or caring about politics outside the US, we have to keep up with ones own state, federal, and possibly the politics of neighboring states.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 343d
The older lady is driven by name recognition.
Signtist@bookwyr.me · 1 pts · 339d
Her and the vast majority of the rest of the American voters.
Saleh@feddit.org · 7 pts · 343d
Corporate media and billions in oligarchy money.
It is sad that we keep having to repeat the same thing over and over again yet people refuse to learn. The Democratic party and the Republican party are both tools of the same oligarchy and they both fight against the normal people in different flavors. The Democrats happily gave the last election to Trump instead of stopping an US backed genocide and since then they often cooperated to help Trumps fascist power grab.
Unless the party is fundamentally changed and all its current and past leaders ousted and disgraced, it cannot be a means for bettering society.
EtherWhack@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 343d
People just remember he was the mayor of one of the most liberal cities in the US, so it translates in their head as him being liberal.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 342d
most name recognition, but in reality his policies always sucked, after he wasnt mayor, he sorta disappeared, because of his lack of charisma, he couldnt get elected multiple times in california. he is a favorite amongst some well off people, but not everyone else. i was there when he was still married to kimberly guillifoyle.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 342d
That pipe dream would be so fantastic!
turtlesareneat@discuss.online · -8 pts · 343d
Gavin has done what no one else is doing, punching back, speaking Trump's language. It's getting attention from all quarters. Meanwhile Dems are busy shutting him down preemptively because purity tests. It's another fascinating move from the "we don't want to govern" party.
j_roby@slrpnk.net · 28 pts · 343d
Punching back is the absolute bare minimum requirement for a supposed opposition party (looking at you Schumer and Jeffries).
But Newsom has been repeatedly demonstrating that he is willing to throw our trans friends and unhoused neighbors under the bus for political points. Ask yourself, if he's willing to betray one group, what's stopping him from betraying any other group should he decide that it's politically expedient?
This has nothing to do with "purity tests"
FoxyFerengi@startrek.website · 17 pts · 343d
Thank you for being more eloquent with your reply than I was able to be. That purity test comment made me see red. Where else are disenfranchised groups to go, but to the left? How can we be represented if the only place we can turn refuses to represent us?
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 343d
Comments about purity tests are conversation-terminating cliches that should be downvoted.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 342d
That's the idea. That's the entire idea. Betrayal of the marginalized is centrists' whole thing.
nialv7@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 343d
Wanting your governor to not kill poor people isn't a purity test...
turtlesareneat@discuss.online · -9 pts · 342d
What do you think Trump will do to poor people?
This is every bit the Dems who refused to vote Kamala because of her Palestinian stance - a purity test that helped ensure Trump won, and we'd sit and do nothing as a genocide occurred. But we sure showed Kamala, huh
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 342d
Anyone who unironically uses the phrase "purity test" is just saying that they have no standards and expect everyone to their left to abandon theirs.
mrdown@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
Isrsael explicitly say they want to do their own version of the holocust and still think it's not the priority? You had zero moral
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 343d
Newsom can talk ahit about Trump all he likes. Maybe it'll help instead of just being an empty gesture, we'll see.
But even if it succeeds, that doesn't mean I'm obligated to support him in 2028. Though I might add him to the list of centrists I despise slightly less than the others.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 342d
many of the people in his state, on the sub, said hes just doing meaningless gestures against trump while ignoring his own states problem
turtlesareneat@discuss.online · 1 pts · 342d
He's redistricting California which, now TWO red states are doing, but only one blue state has accomplished. Will any others?
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 342d
He got it on the ballot, which is being voted on in November. This is not the same thing as him redistricting the state, and it also gives him a way to be blameless if it fails.
From what I can tell there isn’t a law that requires districting changes go to a popular vote in California. If I’m wrong on this someone please correct me.
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 342d
Utah is looking to redistrict in Dem favor.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 342d
dint a red state just elected some senators for the first time in a while due to thier districting.
Zugyuk@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 342d
... by making affordable housing and giving it to the needy?
Smoogs@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 341d
Did you read the article beyond the headline? Is that what it said?
Zugyuk@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 341d
Yup, just making fun of the click bait, referencing the Anakin padme meme
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · -28 pts · 342d
OminousOrange@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 342d
You have had conversations with many unhoused people and they've indicated they would much rather prefer sleeping in places with little security, a high risk of their few possessions being stolen, and little protection from the elements, to a safe, stable place of residence?
I'm quite skeptical.
SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 342d
I've been homeless. This person is either full of shit or the population they were around was drastically different than mine.
There are circumstances I recall where people turned down shelter space, opting to sleep on the streets, but that's because the shelters imposed conditions that were unacceptable to them. Primarily, it was drug addicts refusing to get clean or shelters that imposed religious requirements. The rest was mostly untreated mental illness.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 342d
probably nimby person. the last thing Nimby neighborhoods want is low-income housing being built near them. thats what NEWSOM caters to.
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · -1 pts · 342d
"but that’s because the shelters imposed conditions that were unacceptable to them."
There are people for whom conditions are not acceptable. I'm not saying they shouldn't have access to a safe place to live.
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 342d
Not what I said
OminousOrange@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 341d
I'm curious then, you seem to know the thoughts and experience of unhoused people, yet you're saying you haven't conversed with them. How did you form such an opinion?
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 341d
My comments have been removed for some reason but I started the first one with "I can't speak for all unhoused people but there are some."
Not sure how you could read that as me speaking for all homeless people. I've lived in all kinds of situations with all kinds of people. I've known some who flat out reject being involved in programs designed to help them, preferring to go it alone. Yes, giving up access to safe shelters and other resources. I'm not saying they deserve to go without help or that they should be rounded up and placed in camps. I'm saying understanding their choices can be complex and requires more than just access to shelters or housing.
OminousOrange@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 341d
Your initial comment read like, "we shouldn't provide access to housing for anyone because some don't actually want it."
I believe a better solution would be, "we should provide access to housing and if some don't want it, they won't be forced to use it."
It's definitely a complex issue, but the first step should be compassion and not eliminating practical options because they might not suit a small subset of the population.
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 341d
You might have read my comment that way but you also read it as me speaking for all homeless people for some reason.
There is a risk of using already limited funds for housing projects that pay out to contractors/land developers (profiting off social programs) without having enough to go towards other issues facing unhoused people. The solution is more complex than simply "build more homes" which is what the original message I responded to was intimating.
All people deserve safe, stable living environments, some just choose to forgo those for reasons people seem unwilling to acknowledge.
Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 17 pts · 342d
I think you are conflating chronic homeless (less than 25% of all homeless) with people who are homeless for the first time, or have gone in and out of homelessness one or two times. The transiently homeless are absolutely driven there by lack of housing. Chronically homeless tend to have multiple issues that make serving them a challenge, but targeted support programs have been shown to make significant inroads even there.
This page has a lot of detailed breakdowns: https://endhomelessness.org/state-of-homelessness/
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 342d
"Chronically homeless tend to have multiple issues that make serving them a challenge, but targeted support programs have been shown to make significant inroads even there."
That was the point I was making. It's not just lack of housing.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 342d
I think you're buying republican narrative about the homeless. That is judgement, but so is your comment.
BussyGyatt@feddit.org · 14 pts · 342d
i dont think that word means what you think it means
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · -11 pts · 342d
Lol, I get the impression you don't know what it means.
BussyGyatt@feddit.org · 8 pts · 342d
no shit? you think we have different ideas of what judgement means? what gave you that impression- was it the 1/9 ratio or me telling you so first?
shove your thoughtless reply right straight back up whatever hole you were gonna shit it out of. i've already blocked you.
johncandy1812@lemmy.ca · -8 pts · 342d
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 342d
sounds like propaganda, even housing chronically homeless people, or people who druggies, have a very beneficial effect in an area. even if it doesnt immediately solve thier problems.
j_roby@slrpnk.net · 34 pts · 343d
Diet-Fascism™
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 343d
This is the trick the fascists are playing on us. They've corrupted both sides, and hope we'll believe that the one that is "less fascist" will be able to save us from the one that's "more fascist". NOPE, surprise, it's fascism all the way down! The game is rigged, the trap is sprung, the only winning move is not to play.
If you're familiar with the 4 boxes of liberty, it's time to understand that the ballot box has already failed us and abandon the idea that we can vote our way out of this mess. We're past that. We're firmly in the jury box stage right now and it's not looking too promising with the amount of judicial interference going on, the administration flaunting rulings that don't go in their favor, and the supreme court stacked.
With the fourth box, understand that the first and possibly even most potent ammunition you will ever have access to is free speech. But it will also be the first to run out. Use what's left of it while you still can. Be vocal. Be a shit disturber. Many people need their shit disturbed, some need it to wake them up with the information they're not willing to accept, others need it because they're fascists themselves. Disturb them. Attend protests. Prepare to go on strike. Collective action is more powerful than people give it credit for. The country cannot function without wage-slaves feeling chained to their jobs, clinging to it like a lifeline and too afraid that rocking the boat will see them let go. This is a method of control. Prepare for turmoil and disruption. Find people who can help you and support you when things go south. Seek community and resilience, find people who will look out for you, and do what you can to look out for them. Find ways to organize if you can. There is strength in numbers. The clock is ticking, and it's not going to wait for you to be ready. Get ready now, and get involved. This is everyone's fight, and if you're not already fighting, you're late, get moving.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 343d
Can’t wait to be yelled at to stop complaining and vote for him in 2028
Maeve@kbin.earth · 18 pts · 343d
That's already happening...
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 343d
And he's only the preordained nominee. We haven't gone through the kabuki primaries yet.
scintilla@crust.piefed.social · 4 pts · 342d
These comments make it so clear no one is actually fighting for change they are fighting to go back to not caring about politics. Newsom will throw trans people under the bus and the blue maga will tell us that it's better than what Trump was doing as he continues on the same path. He'll kill homeless people by the thousands but it will be ok because at least it's not trump.
Envy@fedia.io · 12 pts · 343d
frongt@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 342d
Keep complaining, but also when the system gives us the option between fascism and radical centrism, I'm going to hold my nose and vote for the radical centrist.
But I'm also going to continue voting in other races, protesting, lobbying my representatives, and trying to effect change in other ways. You should too. Voting in the presidential race is not the start and end of activism.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 342d
Oh wow like I haven’t been fruitlessly doing those things for the last quarter century
frongt@lemmy.zip · -6 pts · 342d
If you want to do more, consider taking more direct action.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
Oh boy another fucking boulder to push up a hill
frongt@lemmy.zip · -2 pts · 342d
Welcome to being an adult. It's all like this. We take what life gives us, up to you what you do with it.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 342d
What a stupid world.
frongt@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 342d
Yeah. C'est la vie.
Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 343d
Clear encampments by.... Giving them homes to save money?
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 30 pts · 342d
Here's hoping that AOC or some other progressive wins the white house. Newsom, while better than Trump, is still shit.
As for Cali, I am hoping for Katie Porter or likeminded folk to take leadership when Newsom vacates his office. The homeless and everybody else needs help from someone who genuinely gives a damn.
mlg@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 342d
Would bet cash money the DNC selects- I mean uh he fairly wins the DNC primary for next election cycle lol.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 342d
As though he hasn't already been selected.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 342d
he had so little influence after his sf mayorship, he tried to get elected a couple times statewide, but hes just not good overall. plus he doesnt really capture people outside of montery or rich people anyways.
DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 340d
Again with the zombie myth that Katie Porter is a progressive. She is even worse than Newsom.
GroundedGator@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 342d
200M spent on alligator Auschwitz and an estimated 450M annual operating cost.
Some googling tells me that an apartment building can cost about 200k/unit (I suspect it could be less). That's 1000 units. And then imagine what would happen if you put that yearly operating cost into healthcare and other social programs.
They want to build 1000 concentration camps. Florida is working on their second. Texas has one. Other states will certainly follow.
Maybe Newsom should be building homes instead of division.
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 342d
Depending on quality you can make studio apartments, similar to hotel rooms, for close to $50k per unit.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 342d
they are already closing the concentration camp, due to how poorly managed its run.
Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 342d
The vice signaling at the Fed level such as the "alligator" compound, and the "encampments bother my snowflake sensibility, just move them" shit being done in D.C. is not a carbon copy of whatever California is doing. Success at their self-stated goals is TBD, but the California government is putting actual resources to attempt to provide appealing options to those being displaced.
From the linked article, bolding mine:
Death_Equity@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 342d
California spends over $50k per homeless person per year.
How has homelessness only grown?
Because of double dipping and lack of oversight.
One homeless person goes and gets welfare from one place and then another day goes elsewhere. Both places claim them for a period even though they may only actually be going to one place a day.
If California actually wanted to end homelessness, they could, but then the NGOs and administrators couldn't profit off homelessness.
California is performative in altruisms and they will never accomplish anything of value on progressive values if they can't use it to give money to wealthy people.
whiwake@lemmy.cafe · 7 pts · 342d
I don’t suppose you have data for that?
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 341d
So much is not covered in rage bait titles.
this is the same tactic that got us trump this second time.
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 341d
When all encampments are deemed unsafe and local services are already stretched to the breaking point, I think we can be justified in calling this out for the performative anti-homeless bullshit it is.
Nothing short of a complete reorganization of the economy so that working class people are prioritized instead of billionaires will fix this problem though.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 340d
Agreed with the second statement but the first is just abandoning people instead of helping them and that is negligence.
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 340d
Newsom wants to clear out homeless encampments without expanding the services necessary to ensure they won’t just build an encampment somewhere else. That seems like abandonment to me.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 339d
Based on what? The article stated the housing dept is involved. So where are you getting this information from?
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 338d
The article linked a previous piece that has more context: https://ktla.com/news/california/homelessness-experts-weigh-in-on-newsoms-executive-order-on-encampments/|
"Kushel applauded the Newsom administration for addressing the ongoing crisis and its root cause but noted that California would have to make strides in closing the income and housing cost gaps so people can afford housing while also working to increase capacity at shelters so more unhoused individuals could utilize that option."
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 338d
Yes that’s why he’s involved housing. It said it in the article had you actually read it.
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 337d
I did read the article, there’s no need to be a condescending prick.
It doesn’t say anywhere in the article that he’s actually increasing housing, just that he’s “connecting” people with housing services. The article I linked then says that housing services in the state are stretched past full capacity.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 341d
Hayduke@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 343d
You see, that’s why I just can’t get behind this guy. Sometimes he is on point, other times he is a complete fuckhead. At least he isn’t full-time fuckhead like basically every republican, but that isn’t saying a hell of a lot.
BakerBagel@midwest.social · 11 pts · 343d
He's never in point. He made some tweets, then he made a knockoff Trump store hoping people would be dumb enough to buy that shit.
He's a scumbag though and through, only interested in advancing his career.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 343d
If he fights back against Trump, he's an ally. That doesn't make him a friend.
See also: Liz Cheney.
Hayduke@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 342d
Don’t get me wrong, if he ends up being the candidate, he gets my vote, but I’m gonna complain the whole time. Just wish we had better choices than hard-right and right-lite.
3abas@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 342d
That's dumb. He's not an ally and neither is Cheney, and Kamala lost because she embraced a right wing crowd (including Liz Cheney, heh) instead of rejecting them, and you're making the same mistake again.
Not as bad as Trump but still fascist isn't good enough, these people are not your allies, they want the same things Trump wants but without giving him all the benefits. Their only problem with Trump is that he wants to have all the toys to himself.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 342d
Jesus fuckin Christ. Fuck you, you goddam scumbag.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 341d
And You. You definitely didn’t read the article. Just the title.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 341d
I just didn't read it with the same unjustified credulity which you did.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 341d
Based on what exactly? Your feefees? Look at you using descriptive words beyond rage baiting titles on other people and yet somehow you’re above it? I smell bullshit.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 341d
Look, asshole, based on my experience living in California. Based on my ability to read newspapers with a critical eye. "Oh, well yes they are going to use police to sweep homeless encampments, but don't worry, it will be paired with housing and supportive services!" Do you know how long it takes to build the kind of infrastructure that second part requires? Newsom can't simply snap housing and rehab slots into existence, but he can snap police raids into existence, so that's what he'll do.
SpikedPunchVictim@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 341d
Besides overhauling the economy to better suit everyone, which Newsom has little control over, what other policies and tactics would you like to see used instead?
electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 341d
How about don't crow about abusing the most disadvantaged people in our communities, while pretending you're solving anything?
SpikedPunchVictim@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 341d
Certainly you just have more to say on this. There's quite a history of California combating homelessness. What programs and tradeoffs have you seen that you prefer? There is diversity within the homeless community. How did you like to see the different groups managed?
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 342d
This sounds an awful lot like Louisiana...
Relocation begins: Jeff Landry's administration clears New Orleans homeless encampments
Louisiana coerced unhoused people into an unheated warehouse – and paid $17.5m for it
It started out as needing to clear everyone out allegedly for security reasons bc of the Bourbon street attacks and the Superbowl, but everyone assumed he was trying to just slap a coat of paint on the city. Then it happened again when there was a big Taylor Swift concert, now it's like every time "we have company" we should just understand Landry will be rounding up homeless people to make the city more presentable.
People keep saying Newsome is just doing this kind of shit to prove he's a centrist Democrat but I'm kinda starting to worry it might be a little more sinister than that.
Word of advice for California, be very cautious about allowing any state police or task force to permanently or semi permanently set up in your cities. If it gets proposed push back as loud and hard as you legally can, no matter what you local government might indicate about it.
Homeless sweep ahead of Taylor Swift concert reveals conflict between city, Troop NOLA
Troop NOLA: What we know about the new Louisiana State Police troop in New Orleans
Mayor LaToya Cantrell 'in alignment' with Gov. Jeff Landry's crime plan for New Orleans
And if you can't stop it from happening make sure your city hammers out even the most obscure details in a contract. If you're not sure if you need to bother with getting it in writing, you do.
New Orleans council member pushes city to
enter agreementget written agreement on homeless sweeps with State PoliceI changed the original headline bc it's misleading. It makes it sound like the contract was something city council wanted bc they wanted homeless sweeps. The city pushed for a formal contract bc State police were just doing it without any say from the city on how they rounded people up or where they took them.
peoplebeproblems@midwest.social · 14 pts · 343d
Apparently it's really hard to not be an asshole.
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 341d
as described, it doesn't seem as bad as the title
but we all know the reality will not be as it is described
MyOpinion@lemmy.today · 12 pts · 343d
Maybe provide some place for them to go.
Saprophyte@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 341d
I mean... In DC they're just jailing them. Lots of commenters here are trying really hard to make this apples to apples with trump.
syreus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 343d
The system isn't perfect, but California is one of the better states about funding relief programs for the homeless. The major issue is that the weather there is nicer than the surrounding mountainous/desert regions so they are a funnel for the homeless population. South Park made a lot of jokes about this years ago. The real estate value in California is way too high and the only way to fix it is by legislating it away.
Houses are for living, not speculation. -IYKYK
We need to treat the homeless like the UN treats refugees and build tent cities with organized work/training/healthcare. I just don't see how we can do this without the optics being horrible.
roguetrick@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 343d
The US making any moves like China would result in one of the biggest crashes this country has ever seen. It's politically toxic without a revolution or a crash and neither party would pursue it because the upper middle class would revolt if their "wealth" in housing equity would disappear. Even China can't fully commit.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
For a lot of folks their equity is the only savings they have. And those folks are a lot more politically active and pay more taxes and donate to campaigns so politicians care more about them.
It’s gonna be hard to get this passed without a lot of carve outs and/or backlash.
Maybe adding a homestead personal income tax credit for folks who owned their home prior to the new law with a gradually applied cap on it to mitigate the loss of equity for people who only own one home.
But without a ban on corporate ownership of homes it might not help much.
Ooo, offer a 3% matching contribution to get the tax credit as US bonds.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social · 9 pts · 343d
Dude was on a roll
Does this 🙄
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 343d
He must think he can win Republican votes. The right wing of the Democratic Party still doesn't get it.
Maeve@kbin.earth · 17 pts · 343d
So the Democrats.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 343d
Maybe Newsom can reach across the aisle by doing a tour with a Cheney. Remarkably, Dick Cheney is still alive - maybe he's available.
thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 343d
Uh last time someone went on a trip with Cheney, it didn’t really end well for them
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 343d
In true Democratic Party spirit they should keep trying the same thing. Maybe it'll work next time.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 343d
Clearly they didn't tour with the right Cheney.
ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 24 pts · 343d
He’s been “doing this” for years dude. He dresses it up with fancy language but homeless camp sweeps have been happening in CA for a long time and have been ordered by him through executive order, driven by his rich NIMBY donors.
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/07/25/governor-newsom-orders-state-agencies-to-address-encampments-in-their-communities-with-urgency-and-dignity/
Despite surveys in 2023 showing sweeps resulted in police citations as of often as offers for housing he continued with criminalizing homelessness, encouraging local governments to create anti camping ordinances in 2024 (aka criminalizing homelessness)
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-12-14/homeless-camp-sweeps-result-in-police-citations-as-often-as-housing-offers-survey-finds
Flip sides of the same coin. He can play the part because he is basically trump with decorum and slightly different masters. Trump sold out to the extreme right white nationalist fascist crowd, Newsom sold out to the corporate world fascist crowd. If Silicon Valley decides that lgbt support is bad for business Newsom will flip flop (see his appearance on the charlie kirk podcast, testing the waters). He will always back things that fuck over workers and benefit the corporate class.
vote blue no matter who though. Unless it’s someone from the dsa or psl that actually represents your interests of course, then of course the democrat leadership can’t possibly endorse the candidate and will split the vote because they’d rather potentially hand the election to a republican than give you a candidate that serves your interests instead of their donors. But remember, if you don’t vote for them you’re a fucking tankie piece of shit
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social · 3 pts · 343d
I'm not saying this is new. It's just as if he's trying to undermine himself. He could be a rock star.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 343d
He could be a rock star if he weren't who he is. But this is who he is.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 343d
Undermine himself with whom? He knows that primaries aren't honest and that party leadershit decides. He's trying to appeal to them.
ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 343d
“He could be a rock star if he hid who he was briefly to win the election then went back to serving corporate interests, souring people on the democratic side even more and sending them to the republicans or to not voting at all”
Like listen to yourself. You sound like the victim of domestic abuse. “It’s going to be different this time!”. He’s not going to change honey, you gotta leave and find someone that’s actually good for you
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social · 1 pts · 343d
Darling, I'm not voting for him and I'm not falling for him. I just don't understand why he's doing that.
ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 343d
Because he loves money and power and the people who give him money and power hate the poor
queermunist@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 343d
This is what his donors want.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 343d
He's been abusive to the homeless since his time as mayor of SF.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social · 2 pts · 342d
I know, and am aware, but that's not the point here. The thing is, he has a good standing at the moment, and people tend to forget the bad things immediately. Just look at Trump. I expected him to ride the wave and use it for his own campaign. But instead, he decided to revert back to his old behavior and be a dick about it.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 343d
Had to remind us who he really is.
3abas@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 342d
This isn't new, he was a on a propaganda roll, and lots of people won't even see this.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social · 3 pts · 342d
That's what I mean, propaganda works best if you're consistent, at least somewhat.
sad_detective_man@leminal.space · 9 pts · 343d
okay but did you know he tweeted in all caps?
Deflated0ne@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 341d
Bluemaga won't care. We told yall this is who he is. Immiserating the homeless is what he does for fun.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 342d
Fuck Newsom for this, and all his regressive vetoes against laws throughout his tenure as governor to help fix this issue.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 341d
You didn’t Read the article.
nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 341d
And you're swallowing copaganda
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 341d
Tell me how clearing homeless encampments will improve things.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 341d
You Tell me how NOT giving medical help, food, shelter and offer addiction recovery is improving things.
People without housing aren’t props to make you feel better about how you live your life.
SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 341d
Oh boy I sure love the idea of violently destroying someone's home with no plan in place for any extra service or place for them to go. Just hand them a brochure for the exact same services that have failed them for years.
Unless you have a fucking home to move them into you should not be clearing these encampments.
Archr@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 341d
It sounds like they plan to clear the camps and dump the people on the (already strained) local support systems without giving any extra funding or infra to those support systems.
jmsy@lemmy.world · -19 pts · 342d
yup. fuck him, if he's candidate for president, just let the GOP win again
Tinidril@midwest.social · 8 pts · 342d
Fuck him with a garden rake for running for President. The Democratic party will not survive another President of that mold. If he wins, get ready for President Stephen Miller and the end of all things in 2032.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 341d
I can see you just raged at the rage bait title and didn’t bother to read the article.
Tinidril@midwest.social · 3 pts · 341d
None of what I said had was commentary on the article. I was responding to a comment. I'm already quite familiar with Newsom's track record. He's just another establishment lizard person who should be laughed out of the presidential primary.
SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 341d
Why is it never the fault of the Democrats for constantly picking a lesser evil, but still evil character? Who are we appealing to with that? The moderately evil people? Brother the elections are years away, why are you so excited to throw your entire life and hope behind the first piece of shit who decided to swing?
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 342d
If he's nominated, the GOP will win again. No matter how much you scold people who you don't want to have any standards. Do better or lose. Those are your options and I'm certain you'll choose the latter.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 341d
GOP will win again because this tactic of rage baiting dems on titles alone is still working. No one here read the article and just reacted to the title.
This is what happened the first two times. Despite so much studies reporting on this exact manipulation of elections and we learned nothing.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 341d
You have chosen the latter.
The political reality that existed when Clinton earned her loss, Biden barely squeaked in despite not earning his win, and Harris earned her loss is still present. More of the same will result in more of the same.
Newsom is more of the same. Centrists can't win anymore. Betraying the vulnerable and triangulation with republicans isn't acceptable any longer.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 341d
Nope. It’s all down to media and now these watered down brains in here are so easily triggered by a title and refuse to sit down, calm down and do their part in voting and being educated further than this tiktok shit tactic.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 341d
No matter what shit you throw at them? I mean, I get that you liked the last three candidates and want another one just like them, and that's fine since you're so determined to keep losing.
Gates9@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 343d
kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 341d
I wish they said how long people lived there before becoming homeless.
This means someone could have moved there there and been housed for a period of time before not being able to make ends meet.
There's also this at the end though..
So it seems it's still a mostly local issue.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 343d
Someone please tell the Democrats that they can stop now, they've already allowed fascists to ascend to national power. Ease up.
Etterra@discuss.online · 4 pts · 341d
Why help the homeless when you can spend the same amount of money to inflict greater suffering.
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 341d
Literally does say help the homeless but you would have had to have read the article to find that out.
but I guess enraging at minimal information is what we are now.
Tinidril@midwest.social · 7 pts · 341d
Were you fucking born yesterday? This is the same exact rhetoric of empty promises we get every time they sweep up the homeless, and it never ever happens. Where is all this housing? Where are the shelters going to come from? Has Newsom secured any funding for these assistance programs? Did he bother asking the homeless people why they weren't already in shelters? Gawd damn, you only see this level of ignorance and arrogance in two places, red and blue MAGA. You've polluted this entire thread with you're nonsense.
FerretyFever0@fedia.io · 4 pts · 343d
What a nice guy.
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 342d
Thanks I hate it.
Archr@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 341d
It seems like this is a bit of a political move. I understand that the article mentions connecting the homeless that are cleared with the local support structure. But it gives no mention of how those support structures will be improved. No additional funding or infrastructure provided.
From what I understand the local support structures are already at capacity and generally shelters are still unsafe (especially for women).
This is either coming from Newsome not understanding the issue at best. And a political move that will just cause more suffering at worst.
plyth@feddit.org · 2 pts · 342d
So he is a fan and tweeting with capitalized words is not to mock Trump but to pay homage?
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 342d
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 341d
I can see you didnt read the article. You just Just raged at the title.