Make one yourself out of 2 sticks and a bit of rope. To rule out the possibility of the amulet just being magical and having nothing to do with any deity.
No, but I'd definitely put that necklace on anyway. Not like the baby knew anything about religion, but it still worked for him; should work for me, too.
you're trying to shoot an indestructible christian baby
I really want to know why I would be trying to shoot said baby in the first place. Is it the antichrist? Am I being blackmailed? Is this some sick bet?
The funniest part is that this hypothetical really boils down to "What if we had any evidence that what we believe is true?" Well fucking duh, that's literally our whole issue.
I mean... Why did the God not protect the baby anymore? Is the crucifix a required magic catalyst or something to get Gods protection? Do we have any known cases where the catalyst was not needed?
I think I'm closer to solving the riddle of Gods power...
Yeah and how do you know it's not "the devil's" necklace or some demon or god isn't real and it's all demons. With religious logic you have nothing real to stand on to test reality.
While wearing the necklace, can the baby fly? Does it have sharp teeth and can lunge incredible distances with serious force?
If they are leaving out this bit of information, it doesnât help the argument whatsoever.
Okay, but no joke, if removing a crucifix suddenly allowed me to turn a previously indestructible baby into red mist, I think there might be a god and he might have had a plan or foresight into this whole boondoggle
I haven't build my identity around not believing in gods. Show me compelling evidence and I'll reconsider. Shotgun pellets bouncing off a baby would definitely offer food for thought.
Iâd dislike a god even more choosing to allow such a test to proceed. Itâs a variant on the âTrolley Problemâ.
What kind of god would sacrifice an infant to prove belief instead of just popping in with a booming voice and saying âYes, Iâm real you morons!â to prove it?
Nobody goes out trying to shoot indestructible christian babies with a shotgun. They're indestructible and shells cost money.
Is having the cross forcefully removed supposed to make the baby no longer christian, indestructible, or "christian indestructible" (and if so, what's that?)?
Would converting therefore involve or require equipping the amulet I've looted off the now dead baby? And if so, will I lose my christian indestructibility if I take it off?
In essence, would you change your religion if it gave an attunement bonus to something you wore (and perhaps have looted off a murdered faithful)?
Tbf, it'd be worth the shitload in church tax I'd then have to pay... if it worked. Which is the trouble with these religious relics anyway, eh?
I'd probably start believing in magic necklaces. Then I'd start down a dangerous path of experimentation to test the limits of the necklace's invulnerability enchantment.
the question is designed to trick anyone who engages with it into conceding that they would shoot a baby, and then they can turn around and say "atheists want to shoot babies"
Nothing about that cruel suggestion makes any sense. Why did it need to a baby, why can't it be trying to shoot the idiot making this insane suggestion who volunteers to wear a necklace and be shot.
Counter-offer: same scenario to the ignorant Christian who is shit-posting, but the necklace is of Ra, the Egyptian Sun God. Let's see if he would convert. Moron.
Iâd need to put the talisman on an animal, and on an inanimate object, to confirm if the power is faith-based, or intrinsic.
If itâs intrinsic, itâd test if the amulet itself is indestructible, to see if it can be sent to the center of the Earth so our planet becomes indestructible.
But the amulet wasn't at the center of the baby to make it indestuctible. More likely you'd need to put it on a chain which ran around the circumference of the Earth.
Anything touching the amulet becomes indestructible. If the amulet laid on the ground, mining operations around the world would be suddenly halted as their drills and picks and shovels and explosives no longer could damage the earth.
What about stuff like hair or dead skin cells? If I wear a crucifix, can I use a shotgun to shave and exfoliate my legs at the same time? Because holy moly, they shoulda led with that
Well, there was the global flood that killed most life on the planet. Or was that just allegory?
How about these?
1 Samuel 15:
3 Now go and strike Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and donât spare them; but kill both man and woman, infant and nursing baby, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.ââ
Hosea 13:
16 Samaria will bear her guilt,
for she has rebelled against her God.
They will fall by the sword.
Their infants will be dashed in pieces,
and their pregnant women will be ripped open.â
Numbers 31:
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him.
It was arguably worse for the girls:
18 But all the girls, who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
And of course, 2 Kings 2:
23 He went up from there to Bethel. As he was going up by the way, some youths came out of the city and mocked him, and said to him, âGo up, you baldy! Go up, you baldy!â 24 He looked behind him and saw them, and cursed them in Yahwehâs name. Then two female bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of those youths.
You have to do more troubleshooting first, like backing up to widen your spread first to see if the shot leaves a baby shaped outline in a sacrificial background target.
Maybe use multiple boxes of ammo, different brands, different shotguns, etc.
You don't take an opportunity to prove the existence of a god and just whip the necklace off as step two.
Itâs almost like theyâre getting it. Yes, fools, if I was shown direct evidence for your imaginary friend in the sky, I might conclude that they do in fact exist. Bring out the babies and the shotguns, by all means.
If I was ever in a situation I pointed a gun at a baby, it wouldn't be the baby getting shot. There is no way I could wake up each day knowing I ever did that.
I've heard anecdotes of soldiers having a bullet stopped by a medkit, field manual, or other fortuitous kit they kept in their pockets. With enough bullets fired and enough soldiers wearing crosses there must have been at least one who had a hefty enough cross in just the right place to catch a bullet which would otherwise have been fatal.
They're not Christian. They have no knowledge of that god. If they don't know what the god concept is in general, they can't have an idea or opinion on it. Literally what the -ism suffix means in a word; theism,.monotheism, polytheism, atheism, pantheism, autotheism. Unfortunately, in time, they will be taught, but until then, get better with a shotgun or wait for the choking hazard around its neck.
Or how about you just have this god person youâre so fond of, come on down and shake my hand and then show me how he smites the wicked as heâs done so many times in that book you carry around? Worried you might be on the smite list? Im pretty sure Iâm notâŚ
No one wants to kill a baby or eat a baby or just hurt a baby in any way. My goal in life is to get that kid giggling so hard they hiccup.
Which, considering how much I hate it when people
Post their babyâs photos, I donât actually hate this use of ai.
(Seriously. Do not post your kids photos. Even teenagers. Besides the creeps out there, youâve got companies siphoning it up and using it for their own gain.)
So the crucifix is required to remove the necklace.. Is it like also a key, does it have a hidden actuator only a specially tuned NFC tag can operate? Is it just straight up magic?
Also am I back in time and the baby is the one who wrote that question? Because I'd rather raise the kid to not be a dumbass instead.
136 Comments
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 201 pts · 103d
No I don't think that I will.
thorhop@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 102d
It's that "I'd commit murder if it wasn't illegal" mentality. Like "O RLY!?"
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 134 pts · 103d
In order to verify that this wasn't a coincidence, I would need to repeat the experiment on multiple babies.
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz · 50 pts · 103d
Verification is proof and proof denies faith.
That's not how the magic sky man deal works.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 103d
Okay, that's great Jesus, but I'm still going to need to poke you in the spear hole before I buy this Third Day Resurrection bullshit.
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz · 18 pts · 103d
Brand new sentence.
scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 103d
Saint Thomas has lemmy? Fuck.
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 103d
Poke... With what?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 103d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubting_Thomas
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 103d
I figured you'd say you'd use your underpants weevil.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 103d
đ
rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 103d
I like the Tim Minchin line from Storm.
Science changes its position based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observed truth so that belief can be preserved.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 103d
Jesus is fine with giving proof if you need it, he'll just be disappointed you didn't trust him bro.
Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 103d
He should have done a better job then.
Rhaedas@fedia.io · 4 pts · 103d
If you're shooting because you think there's something to the rumor you heard, then that's verification. So you lose.
If you're shooting for some other reason, wtf? That should itself put you on the bad list.
stray@pawb.social · 1 pts · 102d
What if you went back in time and the baby is Hitler?
Rhaedas@fedia.io · 2 pts · 102d
Then you either allow someone more sane to do worse in the power vacuum, or you get killed by another time traveler trying to prevent that.
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 102d
And use multiple crosses.
Make one yourself out of 2 sticks and a bit of rope. To rule out the possibility of the amulet just being magical and having nothing to do with any deity.
Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 103d
We would also need to test this across various age ranges.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 92 pts · 103d
No, but I'd definitely put that necklace on anyway. Not like the baby knew anything about religion, but it still worked for him; should work for me, too.
30p87@feddit.org · 41 pts · 103d
Cast it into the fire! Destroy it!
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 43 pts · 103d
No.
scarabic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 101d
Isildooooor!!
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 48 pts · 103d
No. I'd just wear the cross to become invincible.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 103d
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 4 pts · 103d
This is good news. I can be a bee. I can live like a pet. I can live for 30 years.
ICastFist@programming.dev · 43 pts · 103d
I really want to know why I would be trying to shoot said baby in the first place. Is it the antichrist? Am I being blackmailed? Is this some sick bet?
Leviathan@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 103d
What do Christians think atheists spend their time doing?
multifariace@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 102d
Asking questions. The most vile of sins.
chippydingo@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 103d
Plotting to murder babies obviously. Post-birth abortions are a thing according to Fox News...no /s
lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 102d
Shooting babies?
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 102d
Satanic orgies, drugs, dancing and other fun stuff.
Wataba@sh.itjust.works · 40 pts · 103d
Funny how they keep relying on impossible hypotheticals.
Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 103d
Isn't that, like, the whole book?
tdawg@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 103d
It's mostly fanfic of previous theocratic writings and random ramblings
JTskulk@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 102d
The funniest part is that this hypothetical really boils down to "What if we had any evidence that what we believe is true?" Well fucking duh, that's literally our whole issue.
scarabic@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 101d
At least they kinda framed it as a scientific experiment with verifiable evidence! Utterly bunkers aside from that.
SunshineJogger@feddit.org · 34 pts · 103d
Needs a Christian to even come up with the idea to shoot at a baby....
Taleya@aussie.zone · 31 pts · 103d
They get weirdly intricate with their baby death fantasies
Cellari@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 103d
I mean... Why did the God not protect the baby anymore? Is the crucifix a required magic catalyst or something to get Gods protection? Do we have any known cases where the catalyst was not needed?
I think I'm closer to solving the riddle of Gods power...
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 102d
Lack of object permanence. The baby stopped being a Christian when the crucifix was gone
bstix@feddit.dk · 8 pts · 102d
The entire bible is about a Father who says "Look at what you made me do!"
On the other hand, the devil never really did anything bad.
MBech@feddit.dk · 7 pts · 102d
What do you mean he didn't do anything bad?!?!? He convinced some chick to steal an apple. That's like in the top 3 worst things you can ever do.
bstix@feddit.dk · 8 pts · 102d
She didn't do anything bad. The apple didn't belong to anyone.
The whole story is about God gaslighting them to believe that they should be punished for violating arbitrary rules.
grrgyle@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 102d
Yeah and how do you know it's not "the devil's" necklace or some demon or god isn't real and it's all demons. With religious logic you have nothing real to stand on to test reality.
ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip · 24 pts · 103d
That depends, if I shoot the baby and they die immediately, as if they took a shotgun blast to the face, would you become an atheist?
TDCN@feddit.dk · 9 pts · 103d
I think I'd be convicted of assisted murder...
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 23 pts · 103d
wouldnt it be the anti-christ, since hes technically indestructible. jesus can be killed by normal humans.
Zozano@aussie.zone · 12 pts · 103d
He wasn't wearing a crucifix
::: spoiler spoiler Around his neck I mean :::
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 103d
In roman Palestine, the crucifix wears you!
Magnum@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 103d
Ok you won
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 22 pts · 103d
Maybe don't shoot the baby?
VitoRobles@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 103d
Literally impossible without having Jesus in your hearts.
OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 102d
Instructions unclear, several latino men stuck inside me
6stringringer@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 102d
While wearing the necklace, can the baby fly? Does it have sharp teeth and can lunge incredible distances with serious force? If they are leaving out this bit of information, it doesnât help the argument whatsoever.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 102d
Next you say a baby is not allowed to lunge incredible distances or have sharp teeth?
6stringringer@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 102d
If baby follows rules, baby donât get shot.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 102d
Exactly. Be nice and the baby won't hurt you.
6stringringer@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 102d
What if baby try and steal from you via crypto scam?
andyburke@fedia.io · 22 pts · 103d
Nothing scarier that someone who believes in shit they can't see that encourages them to be violent.
Technus@lemmy.zip · 21 pts · 103d
What happens when the baby turns to red mist? Is that just "part of God's plan"?
3rdXthecharm@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 103d
Okay, but no joke, if removing a crucifix suddenly allowed me to turn a previously indestructible baby into red mist, I think there might be a god and he might have had a plan or foresight into this whole boondoggle
WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today · 17 pts · 103d
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 102d
You're too eagerly jumping to conclusions.
What if the cross just emits a baby-shaped forcefield?
Siethron@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 103d
Just because the amulet of protection in the shape of a crucifix doesn't mean it has anything to do with god. Wizards are mischievous.
AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 102d
Yeah, put that shit on before the fuzz arrives.
YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 103d
Wtf??
Tiral@lemmy.zip · 16 pts · 102d
Why would I be shooting a baby with a shot gun?
I'm an evil atheist, but Christians want to shoot babies with shot guns. Seems legit.
Iconoclast@feddit.uk · 15 pts · 103d
I haven't build my identity around not believing in gods. Show me compelling evidence and I'll reconsider. Shotgun pellets bouncing off a baby would definitely offer food for thought.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 102d
Iâd dislike a god even more choosing to allow such a test to proceed. Itâs a variant on the âTrolley Problemâ.
What kind of god would sacrifice an infant to prove belief instead of just popping in with a booming voice and saying âYes, Iâm real you morons!â to prove it?
thefrozenorth@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 103d
It's christians who kill babies. Gaza, Iran, and the grandaddy of them all-the Oklahoma Federal Building.
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 103d
They have atheists and vampires confused I think
aldhissla@piefed.world · 14 pts · 102d
Got a few issues with this one.
In essence, would you change your religion if it gave an attunement bonus to something you wore (and perhaps have looted off a murdered faithful)?
Tbf, it'd be worth the shitload in church tax I'd then have to pay... if it worked. Which is the trouble with these religious relics anyway, eh?
Glytch@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 102d
I'd probably start believing in magic necklaces. Then I'd start down a dangerous path of experimentation to test the limits of the necklace's invulnerability enchantment.
arctanthrope@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 103d
the question is designed to trick anyone who engages with it into conceding that they would shoot a baby, and then they can turn around and say "atheists want to shoot babies"
BioDriver@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 102d
I will absolutely not imagine trying to shoot a baby you sick fuck
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 102d
What the even fuck is this
theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 102d
I've missed the Christian baby genre and haven't seen it in awhile.
Sv443@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 103d
If shotgunning a baby is what it takes to discover immortality...
Deconceptualist@leminal.space · 11 pts · 103d
How am I supposed to eat a baby that's either indestructible or full of buckshot?
thermal_shock@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 103d
One bite at a time.
thewebroach@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 102d
Nothing about that cruel suggestion makes any sense. Why did it need to a baby, why can't it be trying to shoot the idiot making this insane suggestion who volunteers to wear a necklace and be shot.
Counter-offer: same scenario to the ignorant Christian who is shit-posting, but the necklace is of Ra, the Egyptian Sun God. Let's see if he would convert. Moron.
TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub · 11 pts · 103d
Iâd need to put the talisman on an animal, and on an inanimate object, to confirm if the power is faith-based, or intrinsic.
If itâs intrinsic, itâd test if the amulet itself is indestructible, to see if it can be sent to the center of the Earth so our planet becomes indestructible.
Davel23@fedia.io · 17 pts · 103d
But the amulet wasn't at the center of the baby to make it indestuctible. More likely you'd need to put it on a chain which ran around the circumference of the Earth.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 9 pts · 103d
Anything touching the amulet becomes indestructible. If the amulet laid on the ground, mining operations around the world would be suddenly halted as their drills and picks and shovels and explosives no longer could damage the earth.
mech@feddit.org · 4 pts · 103d
Also, all plants would die.
Soggy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 103d
"The ground" is not a single solid object. Most likely you'd have a thin layer of invincible dirt, best case scenario one really big rock.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 7 pts · 103d
If the same was applied to a person, would the amulet make them invulnerable or just the cells the amulet rests upon? đ¤
Soggy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 103d
Biology is messy but cells are interconnected and if we're accepting the initial bulletproof baby then we know that part works.
Objection@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 103d
What about stuff like hair or dead skin cells? If I wear a crucifix, can I use a shotgun to shave and exfoliate my legs at the same time? Because holy moly, they shoulda led with that
sirico@feddit.uk · 11 pts · 102d
Old testament god seemed to be pretty good and offing kids so this tracks
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · -2 pts · 102d
huh
sirico@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 102d
Read a book
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · -2 pts · 102d
verses
SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 12d
Well, there was the global flood that killed most life on the planet. Or was that just allegory?
How about these?
1 Samuel 15:
Hosea 13:
Numbers 31:
It was arguably worse for the girls:
And of course, 2 Kings 2:
snooggums@piefed.world · 10 pts · 103d
God didn't stop me from taking it off the baby despite knowing I was going to kill it, so no.
CombatWombat@feddit.online · 10 pts · 103d
Probably not. Lots of people die while wearing crosses, so itâs probably something other than the religious symbology keeping the baby safe.
Etterra@discuss.online · 9 pts · 103d
Me: I can't believe in a supposed deity who couldn't think of a way to motivate it's followers better than Gary Fucking Gygax.
Christian: have you considered infanticide?
Zozano@aussie.zone · 9 pts · 103d
In all honesty, I'd think the previous shells were functionally blanks.
Leviathan@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 103d
You have to do more troubleshooting first, like backing up to widen your spread first to see if the shot leaves a baby shaped outline in a sacrificial background target.
Maybe use multiple boxes of ammo, different brands, different shotguns, etc.
You don't take an opportunity to prove the existence of a god and just whip the necklace off as step two.
hakunawazo@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 102d
What if the gun is also cross-shaped?
(Like in From Dusk Till Dawn)
Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 102d
CHRISTIANS: You're about to shoot a baby with a cross of indestructability. But you're going to do it with the Heartline Special. What happens?
GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 103d
scarabic@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 101d
Itâs almost like theyâre getting it. Yes, fools, if I was shown direct evidence for your imaginary friend in the sky, I might conclude that they do in fact exist. Bring out the babies and the shotguns, by all means.
Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 102d
I'd turn the gun round
If I was sick enough to try to x the baby and actually did it would be time to stage left
nightlily@leminal.space · 3 pts · 102d
What does x mean here? What exactly are you trying to do to this hypothetical baby?
Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 102d
If I was ever in a situation I pointed a gun at a baby, it wouldn't be the baby getting shot. There is no way I could wake up each day knowing I ever did that.
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 103d
Has there ever been any evidence of wearing a cross protecting someone from physical damage?
this_jury_is_hung@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 103d
I've heard anecdotes of soldiers having a bullet stopped by a medkit, field manual, or other fortuitous kit they kept in their pockets. With enough bullets fired and enough soldiers wearing crosses there must have been at least one who had a hefty enough cross in just the right place to catch a bullet which would otherwise have been fatal.
Edit: ...or enough bullets fired at children I guess https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/human-interest/9-yo-boys-crucifix-necklace-stops-stray-bullet-from-penetrating-his-chest-saving-his-life/articleshow/127627714.html
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 102d
I mean, any bling-bling would do a better job since it is usually larger.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 7 pts · 103d
socsa@piefed.social · 7 pts · 103d
My beef with God is not limited to the debate over their existence.
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space · 7 pts · 102d
Killing babies, you know, Tuesdays.
uberdroog@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 103d
Dude was out in his yard. Bush on fire told him to murder. Decided probably bad idea. Blames god. Gen 22:1-19
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 102d
Genesis 22:18 And in your offspring, all the nations of the earth will be blessed, because you obeyed my voice.â
good idea
uberdroog@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 102d
Even Persia?
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 102d
yes
saltesc@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 103d
They're not Christian. They have no knowledge of that god. If they don't know what the god concept is in general, they can't have an idea or opinion on it. Literally what the -ism suffix means in a word; theism,.monotheism, polytheism, atheism, pantheism, autotheism. Unfortunately, in time, they will be taught, but until then, get better with a shotgun or wait for the choking hazard around its neck.
BigBrownDog@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 103d
As an atheist, I'll never have problems killing babies.
PlasticExistence@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 103d
I built a special trebuchet for it
Stupidmanager@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 103d
Or how about you just have this god person youâre so fond of, come on down and shake my hand and then show me how he smites the wicked as heâs done so many times in that book you carry around? Worried you might be on the smite list? Im pretty sure Iâm notâŚ
No one wants to kill a baby or eat a baby or just hurt a baby in any way. My goal in life is to get that kid giggling so hard they hiccup.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 103d
Sounds like a Las Vegas magic show.
VeryVito@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 103d
Reno, at best.
redsand@infosec.pub · 4 pts · 103d
Is OP Tanya the evil?
Malyca@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 103d
That kid's eyes are really unsettling
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 103d
Itâs AI image gen.
Which, considering how much I hate it when people Post their babyâs photos, I donât actually hate this use of ai.
(Seriously. Do not post your kids photos. Even teenagers. Besides the creeps out there, youâve got companies siphoning it up and using it for their own gain.)
Auli@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 103d
Chicken why doesn't poster wear cross and prove their faith.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · 3 pts · 103d
Test the necklace on someone else who is an atheist adult see if its just an immortality necklace.
Agent641@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 102d
I'd remember to remove the necklaces before unloading, so as to not waste ammo.
tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 3 pts · 103d
I donât know if youâll be willing to learn much about Christianity if your starting point is shooting a baby with a shotgun.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 103d
That baby has some serious eye asymmetry!
ICastFist@programming.dev · 7 pts · 103d
You can't just expect someone to find a picture of a baby on the internet, you have to genai it!!!
/s
Nollij@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 103d
That might explain why I'm trying to kill it, and why it won't die. But now I'm confused about what the necklace is, metaphorically speaking.
greenbit@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 102d
"Magic" and such is true but a protection amulet won't make me join the yaldabaoth
tomiant@piefed.social · 2 pts · 103d
Shit that's just another baby to shoot, put it on the pile!
modus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 101d
I'm curious. What exactly happens when the round hits the baby? Does the shot just bounce off? Or is it ripped into a pulp and still giggling?
db2@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 78d
So the crucifix is required to remove the necklace.. Is it like also a key, does it have a hidden actuator only a specially tuned NFC tag can operate? Is it just straight up magic?
Also am I back in time and the baby is the one who wrote that question? Because I'd rather raise the kid to not be a dumbass instead.
Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 103d