Say you were a guardian or parent and get to decide when a child can get a phone or use a computer and get internet with it. If you wish you can also install software and change router settings to what you see fit.
Some parents decide to forbid the internet completely, others are more relaxed. Some go the helicopter route, and some do not care whatsoever what their kid does online.
What is your policy on letting a child use the internet?

124 Comments
troed@fedia.io · 74 pts · 93d
When they figure it out and become capable of reading and writing. Tablets, phones and computers are not locked down. Parental guidening and open communication means they know what it is, that there's good and there's bad content and people etc.
Working great.
/Swedish
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 11 pts · 93d
I like this
cynar@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 93d
Similar mentality here.
I've got some basic parental controls in place. They are intended at emergency buffers, rather than to stop a concerted effort however.
The best method is to teach and train. No security is going to be invincible, without being very problematic to work within. Children also learn fast, when motivated.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
Same.
alakey@piefed.social · 35 pts · 93d
Start educating them on what internet is and how it works early, before they even get to use it. Allow them to observe how you use it. Explain the good and the bad it can provide. I feel like a lot of how you should use the internet is just how you should generally live your life - stranger = danger, don't give your personal information to anyone at all (even if they claim to be me/my friend/police/whatever), understand how content engagement works and who benefits from it (ads and manipulation are everywhere, not just online), and so on. Ngl I'm kinda baffled how we navigated a much more dangerous real world "just fine" up until the internet has apparently become some unfathomable evil. By not allowing your kids to learn early, you are just gimping their future, they will have to go up against people who often literally don't know a life without the digital world. Not to mention - if you don't teach them the basics of understanding how to navigate the world and its dangers, they can get hurt whether the internet still even exists.
My one opinion that might be controversial is that I believe that by enforcing arbitrary blocklists (outside of just generally useful stuff like uBlock Origin) and restricting content without explaining and demonstrating anything you are simply conditioning your kids to be ok with surveillance and censorship.
cynar@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 93d
A friend had an excellent (but evil) one.
His son had found some more... interesting areas of the internet (aka porn). He collected a selection of his browsing history and sat him down. They then went, video by video, having an open and honest discussion about it. Dad had FAR more tolerance for mortifying embarrassment than his son did. He learnt to clear the history at least.
The 2nd discussion, 6 months later, used the router logs instead.
I'm not sure I would use this particular method. However, it was apparently highly effective at making his kids think things through (for better or for worse!).
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 93d
this is good because it teaches the kid the importance of privacy and the entire lack thereof online.
it's also nice to not freak out at porn viewing and to teach them it's ok in moderation.
Strider@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 92d
Wow, I'm not sure if I am more impressed at him pulling it through or shattering the adult trust by stabbing him in the back like this.
I mean, if you (parent) didn't tell him, how should he know? It's essential to know in advance.
Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 91d
Yeah, I honestly think that initial "Hey, don't do this" talk is better in advance. I remember getting my ass whooped for saying "Fuck" as a kid when I literally didn't know what the word meant and my parent put the video on in the first place.
Educate your kids on what isn't allowed in the first place. If they do something bad that you didn't tell them in advance, then explain why the action is bad, not to do it again, and that you will be checking/monitoring for that behavior. Then you can at least be fully justified in any future punishments because you gave a warning.
Punishments for initial mistakes and unknown wrongs just suck, and they kinda stick with you š«¤
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 91d
kid needs a vpn
VinegarChunks@lemmus.org · 26 pts · 93d
You sit at a desktop in the kitchen to use the computer. If you have shown yourself to be responsible you know your password.
The wifi shuts off at bedtime.
My 11-12-13 year old kids have Apple Watches for communication purposes but no smartphones. These are charged all together in a locked pantry at night.
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 93d
This is where we keep it more or less. Everything done where I can hear and see it if I want. Network settings adjusted so that itās not pure unadulterated internet that he can stumble onto.
I do allow an iPad, but same rules. Used in common areas and no screens at night. Being able to FaceTime his friends has been awesome for all of them lately with summer coming up.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 91d
if you are a h4x0r you also know your password
Axiochus@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 93d
That sounds pretty draconian.
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 93d
A shared computer and no Internet when they are supposed to be sleeping is draconian?
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl · 5 pts · 92d
Isn't this how us kids in the 1990's and 2000s grew up? (Minus the phone because we didn't have them, or just a flip phone)
Calling it draconian to not be able to stay up all night on the internet sounds kind of like an iPad kid as a teenager lol
lifeinlarkhall@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 91d
Yep. And even then, our desktop computer was upstairs - which was out of the way, nothing up there except my sister's bedroom and a living room that wasn't really used - so arguably that was too isolated lol. We weren't allowed laptops until we finished high school! Even my friend who did have a laptop wasn't allowed it in her bedroom.
The internet was also restricted to go off at 9pm because I was staying up on msn and Myspace all night otherwise š
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 92d
Yeah, I don't want to be like "kids these days" but lol
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 93d
It only sounds draconian compared to the completely unsupervised access that I think most of us grew up with.
I had porn at 13. Shock videos shortly after. 4chan at 16. Outside of being able to discover my own media tastes through piracy and late night binges, I struggle to identify a lot of good that came of my unfettered access.
Axiochus@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 93d
I totally agree, and I've had the same experience. I just don't think that it needs to be a choice between free roaming Wild West tiktok brainrot and some sort of panopticon. I believe that the internet is a legitimate space for learning, discovery, socialisation. I get the many many dangers, but I don't think that prison rules will produce good netizens.
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 93d
I agree, but I think there's less spaces for that then there used to be, and I don't think 13 is a particularly unreasonable age for access to still be restricted. It's probably the older end of when I'd be trying to teach a kid proper online safety and behavior before starting to loosen the reins, but every kid is going to be different. Some would be ready earlier, and others later.
I think we just disagree on where the middle ground might lie, which is probably to be expected on complicated topics like this. Everyone's going to have their own take.
I definitely wouldn't be comfortable tossing a hypothetical kid into the deep end, so to speak, at 13.
On top of that, kids are resourceful with a ton of time on their hands. Sufficiently motivated kids will find ways around restrictions (I sure did, locked doors without a deadbolt are not a real lockdown, lol) or friends with less restrictions anyway, and there's some value to allowing them to think they're getting away with things and navigating on their own, regardless of whether I as a parent would really be aware of it or not.
semperverus@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 92d
This was my exact experience and the exact same reason I won't be repeating it for my family moving forward.
Triumph@fedia.io · 8 pts · 93d
It's not. No devices at night is super normal for kids who haven't learned to regulate yet. It's maybe a bit tighter than I would choose, but I still think it's a fair balance at that age.
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 93d
Have you been on the internet lately?
semperverus@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 92d
You sound very twelve.
BranBucket@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 93d
Our policy was supervised / filtered only until early teens. Kids sites, educational stuff, games we purchased and approved of, etc. We were also late to give them phones, our son got his first because in his freshman year of high-school his band teacher set up a boiler-room to sell worlds finest chocolate and he was the only kid who didn't have a cell phone.
When we had "the talk" we discussed masturbation and porn, why porn is popular, and all the negatives that go with it without condemning it outright. We talked about online predators and not sharing things with people you didn't know, especially pics, addresses, etc.
My wife and I are firm believers that kids need space to discover who they are, so as they became teens, things went to semi-supervised. We paid attention to them more than their devices, but we had rules such as adding one of our emails as a recovery address to any socials they set up, so we could check up on them if we thought something bad was going down. Never had to use that, and I think just having it there made them think about what they did online.
Around sixteen/seventeen, no filter and no more backdoors into their accounts. Just a couple of long heart to hearts about how shitty things can be on the internet and how we're there to talk with no judgement if they need us.
Flaco_waton@feddit.cl · 4 pts · 92d
What in the world is a boiler room to sell chocolate
BranBucket@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 92d
Boiler room is slang for a room filled with shady stock brokers using high-pressure tactics to sell crappy stocks for fraudulent reasons.
When fund raiser time came around, his band teacher told everyone to take out their phones, call relatives, and try to get them to commit to buying x number of candy bars. It was like a little boiler room full of kids begging grandma to shell out $50 for mediocre chocolate.
luthis@lemmy.nz · 19 pts · 93d
šµThe internet is for pornš¶
And not at all for kids. No internet at all until like, 13. And then, with all the safety barriers possible. Before that age, maybe some online gaming (not roblox, just Minecraft) with friends.
Computers don't need the internet to be an enriching tool. Anyone remember reader rabbit? Encarta? The maze game? Time riders? Oregon trail? Age of empires? I learned so much using offline software.
Shellbeach@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 93d
šµ So grab your dick and double click for porn, porn, porn š¶
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 93d
Why minecraft over Roblox?
velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 93d
Minecraft is more centered on building whereas Roblox is a host site for many different types of games. Minecraft is a bit better for encouraging creativity.
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 93d
Cool thanks, my oldest is just getting to the point where he can play computer games (physically) and those are the two he talks about watching videos of with his friends.
luthis@lemmy.nz · 6 pts · 93d
Minecraft is far superior. I still play it sometimes. The only adults who play roblox are pedos. Minecraft you host yourself so you have control over it.
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl · 4 pts · 92d
Roblox has A LOT of pedophiles and child predators/abusers that groom kids. Like a lot, one of the worst on the internet. It has been brought to the company's attention thousands of times and they outright say they don't care.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5pK1OGOENw
Not only that, roblox doubled down on supporting pedophiles and actively bans "vigilantes" that try to unmask them or report them to authorities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5PTomkX1gU
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
That's wild
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · -3 pts · 92d
you lot REALLY take after your boomer parents
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 1 pts · 88d
Well, maybe they had some good points.
Strider@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 92d
Education education education.
Explain how the internet works. Explain companies. Explain evil intent and malicious behavior.
Imo, if you put your child under surveillance that's not the right way. If bad things happen despite good education, fine, introduce limits and guardrails.
Don't do things you wouldn't want for yourself. Be consistent.
Basically, do good parenting.
tristynalxander@mander.xyz · 5 pts · 92d
Sibbo@sopuli.xyz · 14 pts · 93d
Our kid is three now, and the Finnish whatever children's organisation says that no screens at that age, except for stuff like video-calling family or so. Hence, no internet as well for him.
Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 93d
That's our goal with our 4month old.
Has ruined TV for me haha
DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth · 14 pts · 93d
Fuck that, kids shouldn't be on the Internet unsupervised. No access when they're little and restricted access until they're an adult or close it it.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 92d
You couldn't stop them if you tried, which instead will result on them using dodgy methods to access it, which puts them at even higher risk than if you gave them unrestricted access.
Teach them, teach them that the internet is both fucking terrifying and fucking terrific
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 92d
Yeah, deliberately view the pain Olympics and one man one jar with them.
Give them the trauma they were looking for.
Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 92d
Tell them to meet you on the back patio, and bring just one cup.
PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 92d
Mostly the former.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 92d
What's so terrifying about Lemmy?
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 2 pts · 88d
I don't know, but there must be something making people too scared to switch from Reddit /j
czardestructo@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 93d
My daughter is 7 and no unsupervised internet, at most some YouTube videos. She gets tablet time but its just educational games and videos, mostly Khan Academy and PBS content.
Furthermore my wife is working with all the other moms to build a pact to keep our kids cellphone free as long as possible. Soon as one friend gets one they all want one.
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today · 12 pts · 93d
Access to the Internet is not something that the parents are actually capable of restricting. As soon as one kid in the has a phone, their entire peer group is exposed.
The question isn't about restriction. It's about who will be teaching these kids about the Internet. The first kid learns from their parents; every other kid learns (mostly) from other kids.
If your kid is the last in their class to have a phone, everything they know about the Internet they will have learned from their peers. They sure as hell aren't going to tell you they already know about all the things you've been trying to hide from them.
stickly@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 92d
Even so, less is better. Being exposed X hours per week through friends is still better than giving them direct access to a dopamine drip feed for 56+ hours per week (avg for teens in 2025). If they really want it, you can set limited access via a home desktop/tablet and teach the same digital literacy.
A kid doesn't need a smart phone in the same way that they don't need their own car. They don't need to go far distances with bulky items and passengers; they don't need pocket access to banking apps and Slack. A dumb phone/watch can keep them in contact with anyone they could possibly need to talk to.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 10 pts · 93d
No internet.
I'm normally very progressive, but I think we've collected enough data to know for sure that the internet has no good outcomes on children's development. Furthermore, I don't want devices spying on children, so any device that eventually connects to the internet is also a nono unless it's been given an open source operating system and software or completely lacks the ability to record video, audio, or scan for additional devices.
kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 93d
Kids forbidden, Internet OK
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 93d
So I am a parent, and while my daughter is still a toddler (3), I've thought about it a lot. These plans may not hold as time goes on, but it's what I'll be working from at least.
We have an old Android tablet that is "Daddy's" where I've used ADB to remove almost every app from it, and hide the others. It has Disney Plus (some kids shows), Newpipe (set to open right to a playlist of pre-vetted stuff, mostly Sesame Street), and VLC (Mr. Rogers, Muppet Movies and Specials, some Looney Tunes). It only comes out on long trips (car rides more than two hours long), use is always supervised, and we lock the touch controls as much as we can once the content is playing so she can't stray into other YouTube content or the more grown up stuff on Disney.
I'm already working on a Kodi setup with just content for her on it as well, which is reach-able from the living room TV and will be on the play room TV if it gets one. All of Mr. Roger's Neighborhood is up on archive.org, and she loves it. Wife doesn't like piracy though, so I can't just get baby girl's Disney shows on it and make it a one stop shop.
As she gets older, we may set her up with an old laptop and edutainment games, but it would be entirely offline. Maybe a Minecraft server for her and friends we've met IRL. A co-worker runs one for his tween and it seems to do well used that way.
I don't think we'll be allowing internet until 12 years old or so. Even if she needs it earlier for school, she'll start on an isolated network segment to reduce chance of any malware spreading to the whole house. Use will be in a common area of the house where Mom and I can see what she's into at a glance. It will be filtered with PiHole or whatever the modern equivalent ends up being, to block both ads and inappropriate content. Ad blocker on the device itself with similar settings if possible to help catch any strays.
As she gets older, start teaching media and advertising literacy, as other comments have suggested. As we do that, we slowly scale back the training wheels/filters. Depending on how well we think she's ready, I can see unattended, still filtered, but somewhat monitored at 14 maybe. Cut the content filters at 15 maybe. Cut the ad filters at 16 maybe. That's all going to be super-dependent on her own "internet and ad literacy" though.
I want her to get enough of an idea of the unfiltered and ad-ridden internet that it's not a danger to her, but I do hope she'll decide to use ad blocking for her own sake.
17 or 18 it's completely hands off. Can't protect them forever, and she'll need to learn one way or another.
My goal is to protect her from creeps, protect her from exposure to stuff she's too young for, and to make sure she's prepared for the wider internet hellscape before dropping her in the deep end unsupervised like I was.
I'd be very interested in hearing the experience of any parents who have already been through this.
NastyNative@mander.xyz · 7 pts · 93d
The ipad is fine I have a secure network no porn and no voice over roblox. The trick is not to just take it but give them the 10 min warning and they will just bring it to you. We always check his communications and remind him not to share any personal information with anyone online. He has a healthy relationship with the internet and his devices. Sometimes to get his ipad he needs to go for a walk with me which makes for good conversation and itās good for his health.
utopiah@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 92d
crontab, it's enough to :
and it's pretty straighforward to configure, e.g.
or for accumulation (which can be reset daily, weekly, etc by simply deleting the minutes file)
That works also for turning up/down network interfaces.
PS: I use this on myself. I'm not a child but I don't have perfect self control. It works.
pirate2377@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 91d
I wouldn't allow them to have a phone at all until they're around 12 to 14 (just like my parents). When it comes to the internet on a computer, the same thing would apply, but they can when supervised. If possible, their only web browser on their internet device will have uBlock Origin installed with custom block lists to prevent them from accessing websites they aren't supposed to. I would also like software (whether I'd have to program it if it doesn't exist or not) to prevent them from using their devices at bedtime. Not a father, but those are the basics of what I'd imagine I do. Expect one last thing: Roblox is completely out of the question. I don't care how much they beg. It's a predator nightmare so it would be completely banned
Nalivai@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 91d
As someone whose parents attempted to deny technology, this is an excellent way to make sure that your kid has a secret life that you know nothing about, can't influence at all, and you'll be the last person they come for help to if needed.
erev@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 91d
This is unfortunately true. Despite having an IT admin as a dad, it only taught me how to more effectively circumvent censorship. I went as far as using the 3DS browser to access stuff I wasn't supposed to
Nalivai@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 91d
Mine were more hardware-oriented, so I had to learn soldering early on to get replacements for all the cables they were withholding (terrible firehazard now that I remember it), but there was no opportunity for me to learn safety when it came to online, and boy was I close from falling into some unpleasant rabitholes.
lordnikon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 93d
My logic is I like the idea of an evolutionary approach. They are given a computer it has no OS on it. They are given a book on how to install an OS. Broken up into chucks first they get to a CLI based OS then GUI then the internet. Then after that a PDA then a Smart phone. Mastering one moves them to the next one.
YouTube to them is just another steaming service they watch with the family on the TV.
Social media is not banned but there is a test on why its bad and how it destroys people and warps reality. Anything Meta or Twitter is already blocked on the network anyway for everyone in the household for tracking purposes.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 92d
pirate approved š
BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 93d
I'd wait until they're older, 7-8 years of age at least. Then I'd make sure they learn how it functions in some capacity and not just operating it mindlessly.
No social media at all. Heavily curated Youtube, and honestly at the end of the day I'd rather them play outside under supervision than spend all day online. The internet as it is does not go well with developing minds.
theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 92d
Block every site except itch.io until they turn 13, so as to recreate my childhood on addictinggames.com
synapse1278@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
I only go to itch.io for erotic games.
87Six@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 92d
I thought that's what itch was for
For both of us:
theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
Plan scrapped. The only proper way for sexuality to be developed is through large fantasy novels with terrible politics.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 92d
block every site but phrack.org
GladiusB@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 92d
I have an 11 year old son. He has neutered Internet that can do normal searches on. An hour budget a day for games. An hour for YouTube. Other than that he can talk to his friends on Discord or text. I check his Discord every now and then. He only talks to his buddies or my gaming buddies.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 93d
I don't know, I spend a lot of time on the internet so it would feel hypocritical to limit it to a big extent, but I'm not sure if it would be doing someone a disservice to raise them to be like I am. Maybe I'd keep some desirable stuff blocked just so they'd have an incentive to go over to a friend's house where it isn't blocked.
HeHoXa@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 92d
Electronics are for amusement. If he isn't having fun (fussing), time to do something else.
We use it together and communicate during. Zombie mode --> time to do something else.
Great firewall of my house (whitelist). I'm sure he'll figure out how to bypass it one day, and hopefully by then I've raised him well enough to process the horrors of the open web.
Jankatarch@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
Yeah I like this.
I have nothing againt electronics but doomscrolling is a sign of break-time.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 92d
PLEASE abandon this mindset
"electronics" are more than toys
HeHoXa@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 92d
Please don't shout š¢
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 93d
kids get YouTube for 15 minutes a week.
everything else comes from Plex which has been vetted by myself or my spouse.
no internet access other than a school sanctioned chomebook.
I have a windows XP (sp3) system setup with encarta, local Wikipedia, and a bunch of other early learning computer software/games. it connects to the network for intranet, but no internet access at all.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · -1 pts · 92d
get them debian instead of windows xp please
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
why?
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · -1 pts · 92d
less vulnerable and less corporatey
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 92d
not connected to the internet and xp is far from "corporate" these days.
I daily debian, I'll teach them about Linux when they show interest. for now they're kids and are more concerned that the PC laughs like sponge bob over the nuances of corporate security.
thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 92d
No access until teenagers. If it was like when I was a kid probably younger but it's so fucked rn
Malyca@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 92d
Only with my eyeballs in presence. My son is autistic and barely verbal. He also has combination ADHD. I wish I could forbid the tablet entirely but it just doesn't work with a child facing these challenges. For example, he can't sit still through dinner so if we go out, he uses tablet until the food comes. He's obsessed with Legos. All the content he watches is Lego builds. He watches that on YouTube kids with me present to make sure he doesn't slip through the cracks. My eldest is 19 now and we let him access the internet unabated, that was a huge mistake I highly recommend people know exactly what their kids are watching and you should restrict traffic to safe content only.
drmoose@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 93d
Kid that is old enough to use internet is old enough for a parenting talk about internet. It's not that hard.
getFrog@piefed.social · 3 pts · 93d
No internet before they can actually explain how it works. My main goal would be to prevent them from thinking of it as some kind of magic machine that delivers them dopamine. Teach em TCP/IP, Networking, how HTTP functions, how things are actually rendered and what ot actually takes for information to go from bits to images. Then talk to them about how those mechanisms are exploited and how to exploit them back. Advertisement, dark patterns, attention-algorithms and all that. Scoff at them for not using an ad blocker and maybe teach them some small tricks that would make them cool among their peers. I mean, imagine if a Kindergartener showed up to class with their school mandated iPad but was fully able to operate Wireshark lmao
All that is a hypothetical of course, no way in hell I'm having kids.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 92d
idk what to say but this is a good answer and im gonna reply so it can reach more parents
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 3 pts · 92d
ublock origin, no ads, only libretube or freetube
FOSS
Triumph@fedia.io · 3 pts · 93d
Granted, this was a little while back, but we raised our kids with semi-supervised internet, with regular reminders about "don't even tell internet randos your real name." By semi-supervised, I mean that the computer was in a relatively public place, and we'd check on them often - so they knew that a parent could be over their shoulder in a moment.
It's definitely a balancing act. You want them to learn the computer and interpersonal skills but you don't want them in real trouble. And so you have to be permissive with a taut leash.
They got phones in junior high, 11 or 12 years old. Another balance between safety and "this is how kids communicate now". They got a healthy foundation with previous exposure/experience, so we felt they could handle that. Yes, there were times when we had to temporarily confiscate a phone, and the other rule was "parents get to look at your phone whenever they want for any or no reason". We exercised that clause, too.
They're all grown now and all appear to be using technology in healthy ways. We're lucky that the balance we tried to strike actually stuck.
GarboDog@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 93d
Donāt have a kid yet (thought of adopting with our partner) and our decision was they were to learn from books, go to the library with them, at most an old 3ds or psp (weāll fill it with games for them dw) and they can play the games or watch stuff with us (or without if they like) in the living room. Weāre planning on setting up our own Jellyfin server with a bunch of movies and shows (weāre actively collecting those and making sure no brain rot is in there, think Bluey and Captain Planet lol) and they can watch those in the bedroom after they earned it.
As for straight up internet access theyāll be allowed to use a family laptop at the kitchen table and we will not be looking at their private data as itās theirs and not ours, however theyāre free to ask us for help and are given clear instructions not to share private info/if they find a creep tell us and weāll deal with them.
If they collect money and buy (or get a broken one and fix) a phone, laptop, pc or anything else then they can use it wherever and however they like as itās their property and not ours.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 91d
Limited time and very limited access to content, only content that is age appropriate.
Use the deviceās parental controls to limit apps, downloading, purchases, sites, hours available and total time allowed. Doesnāt matter if itās a phone, tablet, or PC. LAN parental controls if available as a secondary layer of site blocking and overall internet blocking at internet curfew time.
Been doing this for years. Itās a must. Parents are responsible for limits on mobile devices and content. Having the software do the limits is far, far easier than physically demanding the phone from the kid, shutting it off, or looking over their shoulder to see what theyāre using it for.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 92d
children under 12 should not have one, it has been shown they actually have problems reading and writing in HS, and doing math. 13+ they can have it, assuming they arnt trying to do something illegal, like stealing credit cards and buying games or whatever.
pirate2377@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 91d
Would you allow them unrestricted access to the internet at the age of 13?
slazer2au@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 93d
Supervised use with Adguard Home blocking as much as possible.
cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 93d
Ideally, my hypothetical child would privately laugh at children like this, but encourage them to play a real game like tag or capture the flag or something like that.
But letās be real, we donāt live like that anymore. Maybe in the 1980s when that tech didnāt exist but if it did, weād be doom scrolling TikTok too.
xylogx@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 93d
The kids devices have their wifi shut off at 11 pm each week day night. From time to time I will have them show me their screen time history and their Youtube watch history.
victorz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 93d
The WiFi policy seems good. But the invasion of privacy will only alienate you from your kids because you show them you don't trust them. (You shouldn't! But you shouldn't let them know that.)
I watched some dank ass horror shit when the internet was young. Tub girl, one guy one jar, beheadings, all that kinda shit. I was just a teenager. I'm a highly functioning member of society. Good work, good pay, wonderful family. You teach your kids what's right and what's wrong and they'll go by that. But you gotta LIVE it too. Don't just preach it. Show them what's right.
My mother trusted me completely to do the right thing. She shouldn't have. But kids don't always do the right thing. But me knowing I had betrayed her trust a few times made me feel awful and I learned that it wasn't worth it. Doing what's right is cool, in the end. Kids figure this out if you show them the way.
And if they never learn what's right, they weren't going to no matter what you did, because it will have been outside influence that was too great, and that's just destiny, you could call it. Nothing you could've done.
Best of luck to anyone reading this.
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 93d
Invasion of privacy can be a good teaching moment.
Don't wait until they've embarrassed themselves: take them through their browser history before they've even thought about porn. Show them router logs before they include pornhub entries. Show them their tracking history while they were far away from you, out with grandma. Explain that you don't look at these things, but that this sort of information is available. That if they use their school's wifi it's available to their teachers. If they use their friend's wifi, it's available to their friend's dad.
Do it while the information isn't embarrassing, and they will learn to protect themselves, rather than be upset about your "invasion".
victorz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 93d
This is a better way, yeah. But I don't consider that "invasion", per se. So that's a win win, then. Good suggestion. š
anon_8675309@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 93d
You canāt make a blanket statement like that. It really depends on the situation.
Our kidsā therapist insist we look at their history. But everyone is up front about it so they know itās going to happen.
victorz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 93d
This is a very obscured statement. Why does your kids' therapist insist on this? Very relevant information, if you ask me.
I didn't really mean for it to be taken as a blanket statement either. You know your kids better. I'm just saying what I believe to be true in normal circumstances.
anon_8675309@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 93d
My kids havenāt had normal circumstances.
A lot of kids donāt.
I would even argue what ānormalā even isā¦
BTW: what are some ways that people can become parents? If your list is longer than one entry, youāre catching on.
victorz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 92d
You're right to ask for a definition of what "normal" means. That's relevant.
To me, normal means you actually wanted your kids in the first place, want what's best for them, you live in a relatively safe environment with western values (perhaps optional, perhaps not), with enough money to own devices where you can watch YouTube, in this particular case. That's about it.
Obviously not a blanket thing we can apply globally, no.
But trust in my opinion is worth it's weight in gold. Trust generates trust. Look at how cats show trust, by not really looking at each other at all, and acting relaxed by maybe sitting down and closing their eyes. Because if you are tense, and you keep watching the other cat, it means you need to see their next move in order to react to an attack. When the other cat sees the first one isn't a threat, they do the same thing. Perfect analogy to this situation IMO. Show your kids trust and they will reciprocate. Maybe not immediately but they will grow into it. That's what I believe. š
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 93d
WongKaKui@piefed.ca · 0 pts · 93d
Oh fuck, I still have no idea....
Hopefully I'll have a plan for this digital era stuff when i become a parant
My parents limited me to like 30min to 1 hour of computer usage when I was like 8 and first had internet access
Then I remember from 12 and onwards, I basically had no restrictions... parent experienced the internet the same time as we did, tech illiterate, so they didn't know anything about how do parental control stuff...
But even after 12, mom did wanna turn off the wifi at night, especially before I started highschool, but sometimes I wanna stay up and I just sneak downstairs and turn it back on lol
Anyways... probably something like:
ban social media till at least 16, and for Youtube restrict to only a select few educational channels, maybe allow direct messaging with classmates, but I think all messages should get logged and sent to me at least till like 12 (am I too authoritarian?). Game time is limited to 30 minutes max; 1 hour on non-school days, at least till like age 10... then maybe be lenient if thing go well...
Politically extremist sites like 4chan would be part of the blocklist... aint no way I'd let that shit ruin my children.
About the porn stuff.... oh yea I heard about it in 5th grade and honestly that was probably wayyy to early for me... it was kinda... shocking....
I'd silently add blocklist for porn until like at least... idk 15 or 16... (is this reasonable? or am I just helicoptering?)... actually idk if I even wanna drop the blocklist till like 18...
Like I'm not gonna get mad if they managed to get access to it anyways... it just feels kinda weird from a parent's perspective to know your kids have access to those things that young... know what I mean?
Okay idk I feel like I'm gonna end up even more helicopter-y than my parents...
Idk its just... if hypothetically I have childen, I'd really wanna protect them (or at least try to), and then end up overprotective...
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 93d
Wanting to protect your kids and struggling with "sheltering vs free reign" type decisions is most of the job of parenting. Whether that is Internet or crossing the street or whatever. Parents who end up overprotective don't always start from a bad place and parents who end up excessively permissive don't always start from a good place. Most people just out there trying to do their best in the face of uncertainty.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 92d
get them a laptop with no OS and a book about how to install an OS, and a usb with debian on it
Sanctus@anarchist.nexus · 0 pts · 92d
I automate school, weekend, and summer schedules with parental controls on mobile devices.
They're just getting into computer gaming so they had to have the internet talk (but most of their games banned chat without ID anyway)
EuroNutellaMan@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 91d
No unsupervised access to any techno-gizmo until they're like 7 or 8, besides a dumb phone to call me or mom or watching me play/do things, maybe play together sometimes or limit it to formative things. Ain't no hypothetical child of mine gonna be raised by an iPad and cocomelon, and since I don't necessarily trust other parents to raise their kids decently I would get them a dog or 2 to play and bond with.
Then, once they start being old enough I will give them their own tower computer, obviously with Linux, privacy-redirects, limited access to the internet (I'm mostly gonna let them access games, wikipedia and stuff that is formative) and their access to YouTube is gonna be via FreeTube with channels I think they'd benefit from watching as already subscribed (plus whatever interest I know they have). Throughout the time I will be teaching them things, indulging their curiosity and gradually explain, reveal and open up things to them. Of course I'd also secretly monitor what they're doing, not to judge but to make sure they're safe, until I know they can safely navigate on their own. As for phones they're getting something locked down with some custom ROM like /e/OS or whatever and just the bare minimum they need to function (Signal to talk to me and mom, calendar, alarms, etc). No social media for them, they at most get to see some of it via privacy frontends. I want them to grow up in a way that the internet is a place they can leave.
Once they've teenagers and understand things I'd start gradually letting them do their own things and gradually giving them more access, allow them to make mistakes and be sure to be there for them to learn rather than just punish. The goal is that by 18, when they'll have full access, they're digitally literate and can safely navigate on their own, or at least be as careful as 18yos can be. At that point they'll also have to gradually start paying for their stuff on their own.
Lumisal@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 92d
I would lock things down but leave increasingly difficult to exploit vulnerabilities so they can unknowingly learn more and more about networking and such
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca · -3 pts · 92d
Child up to age 13 - internet access via PC tower in a public space. No phones, no tablets. I log into router settings to restrict internet access to their machine, (mac address,) when they should be sleeping. I use router to block websites, no FB or instagram. Hell, I will change the wifi password and make them prove they have done their homework/chores to unlock the password for the evening. Ages 14-16 - give them their own pc/tablet. Router still restricts website access, but I stop restricting the times they can access internet. Age 16 - get them their own phone. Presumably I have been talking to them about responsible use of the internet all along, but I reiterate all of the key lecture points. Use router and parental controls to monitor what they are looking at without restricting it. Discuss anything problematic. This is a stage in a young person's life where they should be learning to take personable responsibility for their fuckups within reason, so I am more willing to let them experiment and make mistakes within reason. 18+ - no restrictions. Consider transitioning them to their own cell service that they pay for on their own, so long as it's something they can reasonably afford with their own wages, assuming they have their own wages.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 3 pts · 91d
your kid will be reading phrack and circumvent all of that and have 20 secret devices by 12
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 91d
Props to my children if they are able to source and fund their own devices. Props to my children if they are able to circumvent parental controls I have set up. I did plenty of stuff as a kid to circumvent rules and never got caught. I will throw no shade at a child enterprising enough to figure out how to get what they want. That is a smart kid.
Pyrinder@feddit.online · -4 pts · 93d
Sunsofold@lemmings.world · -7 pts · 92d
The internet is for communication. A child has no reason to communicate with anyone independent of their parent. No internet.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 92d
dude where you do hang your iron crosses?
Sunsofold@lemmings.world · -2 pts · 92d
Wow, such a substantive argument. /s
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 92d
this is just an extremely fascist take
Sunsofold@lemmings.world · -2 pts · 91d
So you say, and yet not any hint of how.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 91d
so like half the people here (who are apart of the lgbtq community) would be dead without a way to communicate to others outside of "gay"-hating families
Sunsofold@lemmings.world · -1 pts · 91d
'Killing people is bad and we should generally have rules against it.'
'But what if I need to defend myself?'
Do you think that limited circumstance warrant throwing away the rule? Or maybe, just maybe, we stick to the general as a general rule but excuse violations of the rule where it seems reasonable? The vast majority of kids are not endangered by queerness, and those that are should be helped, but the answer to a few kids needing help is not to open the floodgates on everyone else. Computers are great tools but the modern internet is no place for an unaccompanied child. It's probably not even good for adults, but adults can at least pretend to give informed consent in a way kids cannot.
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 91d
"children communicating to others that are not their parents is bad and we should generally have rules against it"
"dude WHAT"
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 91d
hey, we got a word for that, its called MURDER ban MURDER not kiilling
and do you have ANY IDEA how big the internet is?
youtube and those slopsites make up less than 0.0001% of it
"the internet" is like saying "the universe"