House Democrats’ anxiety rises after wins by Mamdani-backed candidates: ‘Are we going to let them take over the party?’

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/24/politics/mamdani-house-democrats-primary-elections

403 points · 154 comments · view on lemmy.world

154 Comments

Late2TheParty@lemmy.world · 144 pts · 49d (5 replies)

"Are we going to let them take over the party?"

They fuggen better

Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 49d

They don't have a choice. They are part of the machinery at this point.

Schmoo@slrpnk.net · 22 pts · 48d (2 replies)

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

-- Franklin Delano Roosevelt, leader of the Democratic party at its most popular and most powerful

They should try to heed the wisdom of their predecessor, or they can instead demonstrate how far the party has fallen.

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Delano*

His wife was Eleanor, which I think is why people fuck up his middle name all the time.

tomiant@piefed.social · 4 pts · 48d

Who was a brilliant god damned mind in her own right!

wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 48d

They're not going to "let them" do anything. The progressives are taking over the party whether the establishment want them to or not, because the progressives are the ones with their voters' needs in mind, who serve their constituents over corporate donors.

The mandate from the masses, the consent of the governed, all those lofty ideals that underpin democracy give the advantage to progressives. The only way the Democratic Party establishment holds onto power over the next few election cycles is by abandoning democracy.

it_depends_man@lemmy.world · 94 pts · 49d

Democratic elections happening and selecting candidates that aren't from your carefully prepared inner circle? Unbelievable! It was the their turn?!!

Guards!! GUARDS!!!

Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · 88 pts · 49d (32 replies)

They let Trump take over the country...

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 10 pts · 49d (31 replies)

People who voted for Trump or chose not to vote let Trump take over the country.

gruvn@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 49d (19 replies)

That's not fair to voters. Two elections in a row the democrats put forward candidates who were way too far right, and essentially told everyone to suck it up and vote for them anyways. You can hardly blame people for not voting. I'm not American, but I don't know if I would have voted in election either.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -9 pts · 49d (18 replies)

You’re in dreamland if you think Biden and Harris are far right.

gruvn@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 49d (6 replies)

I'm in Canada. Most of your democrats would have to run as conservatives here. And even Obama was drone-striking kids in the middle east, so maybe the lenses through which we look at the world are different.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -13 pts · 49d (5 replies)

Deal with your residential schools and get back to me about improving our country after.

yes_this_time@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 48d (4 replies)

Maybe you should brush up on your history before tossing around comments like that. (And that's not giving a pass to residential schools)

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -4 pts · 48d

What part of history should I brush up on?

The part where the last residential schools shut down in 1996?

Thirty years ago?

Toothy@lemmus.org · 10 pts · 49d

It’s not that they are far right, it’s that they are barely left if not dead center.

YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 48d (5 replies)

I mean they did help commit a genocide you can't really get any further right than that.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 2 pts · 48d (4 replies)

This is why American politics are fucked.

If Harris was president I guarantee you Israel would at least be restrained like they were when Biden was president.

There’s a reason that fuck Netanyahu wanted Trump to win and it’s not because the two parties are the same.

YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 48d (3 replies)

What restraint? Under Biden they killed countless and completely destroyed Gaza. Israel got everything they wanted from Biden who need I remind you supported Israel for 40 years while in the government.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 1 pts · 48d

Like every other politician until last year?

But things ramped up a hundred times after Trump got power.

quick_snail@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 48d (3 replies)

Center right*

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 1 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Leftists think they’re right, right wingers think they’re communists.

bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Right wingers think airplanes are sky demons. So?

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 0 pts · 48d

No they don’t.

YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 48d (8 replies)

And what about the democrats who refused to put Trump in prison for trying to overthrow the government and raping children?

bedifferent@mastodon.social · 2 pts · 48d

@YoureHotCupCake @SatansMaggotyCumFart Huh? The democrats didn't refuse to put the asshole in prison. There were impeachment hearings. The maggots didn't want to put their violent-rapist daddies in prison (other than Cheney and Kinzinger).

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -4 pts · 48d (6 replies)

You mean the trials that got put on hold because Americans decided they didn’t give a shit so they voted Trump back in?

Those trials?

bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Yes, the ones that should have happened, didn't happen and weren't going to happen because Biden hired a Republican to be AG. Those trials.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -2 pts · 48d

Oh man you mean the most complicated case the us justice system has ever seen didn’t get wrapped up nicely in four years?

The horror!

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 48d (3 replies)

That's not what happened at all. He was convicted on 34 counts, but Cannon refused to do her job and pass sentence.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -2 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Americans didn’t elect Trump?

Sitting presidents don’t get a pass?

bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Voting machines elected Trump.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -1 pts · 48d

Conspiracy theory.

Malyca@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 49d

And Chuck helped in the name of Israel

Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 49d

Agreed. Them, too.

pjwestin@lemmy.world · 80 pts · 48d (6 replies)

One Democratic lawmaker sitting in a battleground district told CNN that they are so concerned about the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America that they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.

The fact that their impulse is to get their donors opinions instead of their constituents is why they need to be primaried.

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 48d (1 reply)

leaving the party altogether

Don't let the door hit you in the ass.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 48d

All these Bloombergcrats just piled into the party a few years ago, then realized Epstein wasn't around anymore and decided to bail.

AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 48d (3 replies)

Exactly, the only question anybody needs to be asking them is who's interests do you actually represent? Because it's become increasingly obvious that donors of certain Dems have basically hired them to fumble the ball and enable Republicans stay in power.

I think American Oligarchs realized decades ago that creating the conditions that lead to voter apathy and provide credibility to "both sides" arguments, would probably be a cheaper and more effective strategy than convincing a majority of people to actually vote against their own interests.

Not to mention this threat to leave the party bullshit is basically the same as the threat to leave California and NYC bc of wealth tax. Fucking go then and don't let the door hit you on the way out, because you're probably responsible for ~95% of the problem. All you've done is exploit people and help weaken democracy.

Anybody who believes it makes a lick of fucking sense to keep pretending the U.S. is the greatest country in the world and social safety nets are unnecessary, (while most Americans are now struggling to afford groceries, let alone healthcare and education), has already switched teams. They might as well put on their "corporations R people 2!" jersey and own who they've been representing this whole time.

pjwestin@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Anybody who believes it makes a lick of fucking sense to keep pretending the U.S. is the greatest country in the world and social safety nets are unnecessary...has already switched teams.

YUP. And the most infuriating part is that, since about Reagan, the left bave been the ones that been told we must acquiesce to centrists, that we couldn't win elections without, "moderates," that we had to accommodate Clinton and the third-way crowd.

Now, after a decade of slow declined followed by a decade of rapid collapse, it's clear that the centrists can't win in this political landscape. Do the party leaders see where the wind is blowing, listen to the voters, follow the progressives' victories, and tack to the left? Nope! They act as though pushing for social spending and welfare programs, AKA what the Democratic party stood for since FDR, is some sort of betrayal.

Moving to the right? "Look, we need a big tent, but we're all on the same team!" Moving back to the left in the slightest? "Fuck you, I'm quitting the team."

AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 47d

Democrats have been self sabotaging in a doomed attempt to play catch up with the right since Reagan's election because they mistakenly thought Carter's defeat was a reflection of true public opinion. By moving closer to the center and trying to distance themselves from the mudslinging and reputation of being "radical socialist/communist/marxists/pc/multicultural/woke/etc." and catering to corporate interests, they thought the could replicate what the right did to reach the common man and being people under that "big tent."

Except, Reagan's election was actually due to batshit levels of manipulation of public opinion in addition to the propaganda/advertisement campaign funded by a coalition of wealthy and powerful corporate interests. Literally the man who created the concept of a tax shelter, and had been undermining democracy and progress in the United States since FDR's New Deal (and likely long before that), got Reagan elected and became his first CIA director.

Mainly just a bunch of rich assholes with too much hoarded money and power who despised the idea of being taxed to help pay for public resources and services.

Meanwhile, while the Dems were falling for propaganda and losing their own support while trying to cater to corporate interests and bring everyone under one big tent, behind the scenes, Republicans were literally being coached by political strategist and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation Paul Weyrich, to never give an inch and never compromise.

And now here we are in 2026, with the federal government on the verge of complete collapse and corporate interests holding all the money and power necessary to take over if/when that happens.

No more pesky taxes, regulations, consumer protections, safety nets or labor laws. Ultimately the last nail in Democracy's coffin.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 48d

who’s interests do you actually represent?

Hmm, let's see

they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.

Not a word there about constituents.

AshMan85@lemmy.world · 73 pts · 49d (3 replies)

Let them take over? You must not be familiar with how a republic works.

Akasazh@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Well therein lies the difficulty of the timing of this matter. If the Dems decide that democracy isn't working out for them they might be open to Trumps plans to dismantle the democracy.

AshMan85@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 48d

Seems like they already are.

bedifferent@mastodon.social · 2 pts · 48d

@Akasazh @AshMan85 Is this a test because if they do that, we'll never know about it.

Like Sandra Day O'Connor voting with republican scotuses to give the election to GWB not Gore ... I learned that near her or after her death. Grrrr

Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip · 65 pts · 48d (3 replies)

Status quo democrats right now.

dermanus@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 48d (1 reply)

This gif might be the best thing to come out this year.

FLP22012005@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 46d

I hope we're going to get a lot of use of of it.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 48d

FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world · 62 pts · 48d (6 replies)

"Let them" ? Excuse me?

Mother fucker in a real democracy YOU don't have any say in the matter. What you're seeing happen is the will of the people. Yes, you will "let us" vote for the candidates that we want to vote for.

Try to take that away, it's about all we (barely) have left. See what happens.

yakko@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 48d (1 reply)

American political parties aren't public institutions, their inner workings are beholden to nobody but their paymasters. It's a rotten problem so old everyone's stopped noticing the smell

badgermurphy@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 48d
[ removed ]
luciferofastora@feddit.org · 3 pts · 48d (3 replies)

The most charitable reading would be "Their positions are winning votes. Are we going to stick to our conservative positions and let them drive us out the party or are we going to adopt their progressive positions in order to retain power?"

I'm not too optimistic though. They might sacrifice principles, but I'm not sure their pride could stomach accepting that their stubborn attempt to win over the right was fundamentally flawed. Nor could their donors stomach it.

Soup@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Considering all the times they’ve literally worked to attack more progressive members of their own party, even when it would lead to clear loss, I’m not giving the DNC any charity.

Centrists have lost all generosity and instead dessrve only animosity. Worthless conservatives pretending that they aren’t.

luciferofastora@feddit.org · 2 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Oh I agree with you.

Starting from charity is just my method of analysing statements, before proceeding to argue against it. That doesn't mean I consider it likely. In fact, I generally find it easier to spot the flawed premises (such as humility to admit mistake and integrity to put what's right over what's profitable) required to support that assumption.

If I start from the negative position, I find it hard to reason my way out of cynicism (probably because cynicism comes naturally to me) and reach a nuanced position. I also found that a "negative by default" stance is bad for my mental health.

Soup@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 47d

I get that, but at this point they’ve already shown their faces. The bar is too low and they still can’t clear it.

dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net · 47 pts · 49d (1 reply)

You already did, by refusing to listen to constituents. They’ve taken over, and that’s good.

Neverbeaten@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 49d

"...Let them take over the party?"

We ARE the party. We've been the party.

Imbeciles.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 46 pts · 48d (2 replies)

"Oh my God! What if they take over and start doing things that actually benefit people?"

PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Won't somebody think of the rich donors!?

Denalduh@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 48d

sharpening guillotine blade

Mmm rich donors.

rumba@lemmy.zip · 42 pts · 48d

"them" are the constituents and if they're taking over the party, it's working as intended.

KaChilde@sh.itjust.works · 41 pts · 49d (3 replies)

Really just yelling the quiet part to the nosebleeds, aren’t they?

It was never about helping their constituents. The moment someone outside of their inner circle becomes popular, the facade drops and it’s all about voting ‘correctly’ and the popular person ‘stealing’ the vote.

At least they pretended to not be vicious ghouls who don’t care about actual humans when they skipped over Bernie to hand the election to Trump.

ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one · 16 pts · 49d

At least they pretended to not be vicious ghouls who don’t care about actual humans when they skipped over Bernie to hand the election to Trump.

It makes me sad that we will never see Bernie debate Trump.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 48d (1 reply)

They're goalies for the oligarchs.

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d

aesthelete@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Yes

Doomsider@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 47d

The only correct answer.

FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 47d

I agree! FUCK THE CORPORATE DEMS!

DupaCycki@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 48d

Controlled opposition cries that actual opposition is taking some Ws. Keep them crying. Or just hang them.

jordanlund@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 49d

Ideally? Yes! This needed to happen when the Tea Party took over the Republicans, it's long overdue!

valar@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 49d

"Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”

Why thank you, no I am not.

Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 22 pts · 48d (4 replies)

Let's hope they don't get a say.

Gates9@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 48d (3 replies)

The Democratic Party is a private institution that is not obligated to follow the will of their voters. If their divergence from national policy polling is not enough to prove that, it was stated directly by their lawyers during the lawsuits related to their suppression of the Bernie Sanders campaign.

Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 48d (2 replies)

I absolutely agree. I want to be clear. I hope the DNC gets no say on the future of the American left. They fumbled it.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 48d (1 reply)

The DNC exists largely to block the will of the voters, especially anything even vaguely leftish.

reka@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d
cmbabul@slrpnk.net · 21 pts · 49d

If there was ever any doubt that the DNC was bought and paid for this ought to remedy that, when faced with a popular platform they fear how their opposition’s adherents

Bluedragon012@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 48d

This what you get got not listening. Cry some more. I look forward to the downfall. Socialists will rise because the DNC fell deep into greed.

kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 48d (2 replies)

“Obviously, the socialists had a big win last night. The question is, are we going to let them take over the party? Or are we going to stand up and fight back?” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, a moderate Democrat who has criticized Mamdani’s politics and how he’s addressed allies of Israel. “Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”

Get fucked Josh, also...

A democrat (lowercase "d") is broadly defined as a person who advocates for democracy and believes in the principles of political or social equality.

The name of your party, would disagree with your assessment. Also, the fact that your party used to represent the Jim Crow south and opposed civil liberties for non-whites, while, thankfully, it is now the one championing (at least comparatively against the Republicans) racial civil liberties and equality, means that your party has changed before and changed for the better. It changed to more closely align to the definition of the word. It can and will continue to change becuase, famously, change is the only thing that is permanent. And hopefully it changes to align even closer still to that definition. If you think you are representing equality while championing capitalism, corporatocracy, military dominance, and supporting apartheid and genocide states, well you need to either get a reality check or lose your job. And if your party is full of asshats like you, it might need an overhaul.

bugbearownsyou@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 48d

The idea of a moderate Democrat standing up and fighting back for anything is so patently absurd at this point.

P1nkman@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 48d

Both parties have tried to make America Rhodesia 2.0.

GutterRat42@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 48d

Maybe all Dem centrists can finally move to the Republican Party where they belong

Fmstrat@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 47d (2 replies)

“If you ask me, it was not a good night for New York,” Rep. Greg Meeks, a powerful New York Democrat who is close with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, told CNN..

... Meeks added: “Instead of us making sure we put all of our resources to fight Republicans and to fight Donald Trump, we’re using it to fight each other. It just doesn’t make common sense to me.”

So close to a revelation...

fishy@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 47d

It's all fucking power plays. They get it, but giving their base what they want means taking a step back and these ghouls want the power and money more than they want a healthy republic.

The current Democrats have the same morals as the current GOP, it's only the fact their base would totally rebel that keeps them from sucking Trump's toes.

motruck@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 47d

Fuck these lazy politicians sitting there towing no fucking line and making tons of money. Yes. They will change your party your tired politics of all for me a none for thee needs to go.

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org · 17 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Rather than meeting voters where they are, leadership dems plot to suppress would-be future leaders. Same playbook they used on Bernie in 2020.

dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d

If anything, we probably have Bernie to thank for sussing out this party behavior. We might not have known otherwise.

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d

And 2016.

Blackmist@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 48d

Keep going. This is the only way you're going to get any change short of all-out civil war.

catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 47d

Not your choice. Sucks to suck

ContactClosure@lemmus.org · 12 pts · 49d (1 reply)

Lmao no you stupid idiots, you killed the party through years of hard work.

davidgro@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 49d

Lack thereof.

GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 48d (1 reply)

What's crazy is the Democrats in power could have protected their seats with just a modicum of spine when it comes to trump. Something just slightly more than a strongly worded letter would have kept many casual "I-don't-follow-politics" voters blinded. But they are so incompetent that they couldn't even do that. And now they are surprised when they get challenged on it?????

almost_genocide@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 47d

It's not a lack of spine. We've been saying it for a while now. They don't serve the voters.

Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 48d

If you want to win the next election, I'd advise you to seriously consider it.

caboose2006@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 47d

If that's what the people want, yes.

orenj@leminal.space · 10 pts · 48d

They'd better

Formfiller@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 48d

AIPAC and fascist Israeli interests are not welcome. Bye Felicia

resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe · 7 pts · 48d

No, they won’t let us.

quick_snail@feddit.nl · 7 pts · 48d

Step out of the way.

BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 48d

"Top Democrats" looking more like "Bottom Democrats" every day now. 🤣

bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 48d

"Let"

Lasherz12@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 48d

Who is the party? The constituents or the blowhards at the top and the army of consultants suckling off the teet of their donors? Great litmus test to admit Democratic voters don't matter. Let's see how many wanna commit to that.

the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 48d

Let them..... lol.

salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 48d (2 replies)

House Democrats’ anxiety rises after wins by Mamdani-backed candidates: ‘Are we going to let them take over the party?’ | CNN Politics Sarah Ferris, Ellis Kim, Annie Grayer 9 - 11 minutes

Top Democrats insist that they’re unfazed by the party’s forming a “Zohran Mamdani wing,” after the New York City mayor’s stunningly successful primary night.

But there is growing angst among many sitting congressional Democrats after Mamdani allies won three primaries, including defeats of incumbent Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman. And, most immediately, they worry it will make it tougher to flip the House this year, with Republicans eager to tee up the Mamdani slate’s most controversial positions for attack ads in battlegrounds across the country.

“Obviously, the socialists had a big win last night. The question is, are we going to let them take over the party? Or are we going to stand up and fight back?” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, a moderate Democrat who has criticized Mamdani’s politics and how he’s addressed allies of Israel. “Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”

Gottheimer and others worry that Republicans will try to yoke their most vulnerable members to what they see as far-left ultra-progressives — and they worry that it will only highlight Democratic divisions in a must-win election year.

“If you ask me, it was not a good night for New York,” Rep. Greg Meeks, a powerful New York Democrat who is close with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, told CNN when asked about deleted posts from Darializa Avila Chevalier, who defeated Espaillat, expressing support for abolishing police, prisons and borders.

Asked about the fraught relationship between the Democratic Socialists of America and the Democratic Party, Meeks added: “Instead of us making sure we put all of our resources to fight Republicans and to fight Donald Trump, we’re using it to fight each other. It just doesn’t make common sense to me.”

One Democratic lawmaker sitting in a battleground district told CNN that they are so concerned about the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America that they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.

If Democrats do flip the House, the number of democratic socialists in their ranks is still likely to be a small minority of the caucus. And Democrats remain confident they can still win the House in November.

The House Democratic caucus gathered for a private briefing by their party arm on Wednesday morning, where party leaders presented internal polling showing Trump underwater in key battlegrounds, according to two people familiar with the briefing. No one brought up the Mamdani-backed candidate wins. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries talks with reporters in the Capitol Visitor Center on Wednesday.

The Mamdani-backed candidates who won on Tuesday ran on the same affordability message that the party has embraced nationally, but their victories highlight broader friction over Democrats’ status-quo tactics in Washington — as well as deep divides on Israel.

“Our party nationally will need to reckon with this fact given that what you witnessed yesterday was not an anti-affordability or anti-economic policy strategy that won; it was an anti-establishment strategy beyond messaging that trumped,” a senior House Democratic aide told CNN.

Speaking Wednesday morning in New York City, Mamdani made the opposite argument, though he also connected cost-of-living issues to his longstanding critiques of US military support for Israel, a key issue in all three primaries.

“What we saw last night was a hunger for leaders who will be there on the front lines looking to make it easier for working people to afford life in the greatest city in the world,” he said.

Jeffries on Wednesday downplayed fears within his party that the wins could reverberate in battleground districts this November.

“No, Donald Trump has a working relationship with the mayor of the city of New York, and he’s made that publicly and explicitly clear to America, not once but twice in the Oval Office,” Jeffries said.

Jeffries was asked by reporters if Mamdani had made enemies on Capitol Hill.

“Listen, the mayor and I agreed to strongly disagree about some of his endorsements, and he’s got work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward,” Jeffries, who backed Espaillat and Goldman, told reporters.

Asked if Democratic voters want their members in Congress to be more progressive, Jeffries responded: “I think we’ve got to look at the totality of all 215 members of the House Democratic caucus, and that answer speaks for itself.”

The Brooklyn representative told reporters his relationship with Madmani[sic] is “a very good one” and that the pair speak regularly.

Jeffries, who famously took months to decide whether to endorse Mamdani in the mayoral primary in his home city, eventually did back the mayor. But not all of his Democratic members from New York did.

Rep. Tom Suozzi, a centrist from Long Island, has been vocal in his critiques of democratic socialists, including Mamdani.

After Tuesday night’s primaries, Suozzi said the victories by the far left have sent a message to mainstream Democrats that they need to do better. But he doesn’t think it calls for a push toward far-left policies.

“It’s a warning that people have got to do a better job. They’ve got to work harder” to prove to voters they have solutions to make life more affordable, Suozzi said. He compared the rise of democratic socialists to the MAGA surge in the GOP.

“I think the bottom line is that the DSA and the far left — as well as the MAGA movement and the far right — are organized, and they’re doing a good job organizing, and they’re tapping into people’s concerns about their economic insecurity. I think Trump did that in his campaigns. I think Mamdani did that in his campaign for mayor. They tapped into people’s real concerns about economic insecurity. I just happen to disagree with their solutions,” he said.

But Morris Katz, a campaign strategist who is a key Mamdani ally, argued that Democrats can have a “big-tent populist party” that focuses on affordability and “invests in domestic priorities, in schools and in hospitals rather than in wars abroad.”

“I think that we spend a lot more time talking about labels than the average swing voter thinks about that,” Katz told CNN’s Dana Bash. “You see people interact with policies, campaigns, and ideas not predicated on the label they’re applying to themselves, but how are they going to make their lives better?”

And on Capitol Hill, progressives like Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna celebrated Tuesday night’s results.

“It’s a big win for the progressive wing of the party. We are a new party that will call out the genocide, tax the billionaires, and stand up for single payer healthcare” Khanna told CNN. “Our party wants a new generation leaders willing to challenge the status quo and call out the establishment.”

But one longtime Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, firmly disagrees that the results reflect the mood of the country.

Instead, he said it’s a small minority of Democrats who have run extremely effective campaigns.

“I think we have a lot of more organizing to do on the ground, especially in places like New York and California, places where DSA is is is being more influential, and we need to educate young people, we need to get more people, young people, involved on more moderate policies, just the way the other side has, and run strong campaigns,” Gonzalez said.

“I don’t think it should be a concern for people in South Texas, but I think nationally it’s a huge concern, and how they push the policies within the Democratic caucus that we’re going to have to defend,” Gonzalez added. “A lot of these policies that obviously I don’t agree with and would be very difficult for me to sell to people in South Texas, and I don’t intend to sell them, because I don’t believe in most of them myself.”

As for his own reelection, Gonzalez was confident he could still win despite any GOP attacks linking him to the DSA: “I’ve been around long enough that people don’t see me as a socialist. In fact, I get beat up by socialists.”

This story has been updated with additional details.

CNN’s Manu Raju and Alison Main contributed to this report.

salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 48d (1 reply)

They mispell his name as "Madmani" in one paragraph and have no way to submit a correction 🤦

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d

It's kind of hard to believe that one wasn't deliberate, or at least a freudian slip.

FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 47d

TwinTitans@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d

You sure should.

tacoplease@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 48d (15 replies)

Democrat Socialists should just form a new party on their own.

DoomProphet@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 21 pts · 48d (7 replies)

Bad idea. The system in the US is so bad that more than two parties aren't viable and the brand recognition of the Democratic party is so huge that it's better to take it over.

chilicheeselies@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 48d

Counterpoint, there wasn't always a dem and Republicans party. There used to be different parties in the two party system. If the brand recognition is good, but it's seen as bad, then making a new party to turn the existing one fringe isn't such a crazy idea. Let's see if it's actually necessary though

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d

The system in the US is so bad that more than two parties aren’t viable

More than one is barely viable. The idea of a two-party system hasn't been practical since Obama won in '08. Gerrymandering and voter caging has isolated the minority party in nearly every state. US is a confederacy of single-party dictatorships, for the most part.

tacoplease@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d

Form the 3rd party .. with a completely different name ... Call it the Upgrade party

NM_Gringo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d (1 reply)

If you can't take over the Democrats, then you can't politics.

daychilde@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 48d

The problem is that the current two parties have so much money coming in from our oligarchs. That's why the Republicans have turned to fascism because they were even more susceptible to corruption than a lot of the Democrats.

I don't know if there's a single Republican that isn't beholden to our oligarchs. Maybe there is but I'm just not aware.

I am aware of a couple like AOC and Bernie, who as far as I can tell are really not beholden to the oligarchs.

And that's also true of this new social Democratic movement.

The problem is that the oligarchs gives so much power to those that they're able to corrupt that it is an uphill battle, even with the support.

The propaganda countering real progress is so strong because it is so friendly supported by our oligarch.

So I just don't find a statement like yours fair. Because it's such an uphill battle and an unfair battle. If it was a fair battle I would agree. They should be able to win if they get support.

But even if they get support, the oligarchs are able to throw so much money against them that I don't know if we can take over the party. I hope they can but I don't know if they can

PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Just call themselves the New Democratic Party. Maybe make their colours orange.

Kaput@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 48d

You sneaky Canadian.

badgermurphy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 48d
[ removed ]
bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Why?

tacoplease@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d

To break free of all the existing notions of what people think the Democrats are about.

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d

Nah, the tea party, and later maga, showed us the way. You can get tangible results taking over the party pretending to be on your side.

FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Socialists should actually just have a revolution and rewrite the constitution to prevent reactionaries like the DNC and GOP from ever holding political power ever again.

zbyte64@awful.systems · 1 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Without securing a popular mandate through an election? People are tired of elites rewriting the rules, how exactly is a vanguard going to be viewed as legitimate?

FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 48d

Well obviously a revolution cannot succeed without mass class consciousness, and secondly, vanguard parties are made up of the working class, not elites. You can look at the Worker's Party of Belgium for an example of how to build a modern vanguard party within a capitalist system that maintains the trust of the working class. For example, their members are not allowed to live on more than the average Belgian wage, even if they are high earners. The extra money gets put back in their coffers to perform mutual aid work, such as their large network of medics and doctors.

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · -4 pts · 48d (6 replies)

I think the younger folk taking over the democratic party is a good idea. We all turn more conservative when we get older (especially if we now have more "money" to protect) and the democratic party skews on "dotard". Just to be clear though, fuck trump.

Soup@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 48d (2 replies)

The entire idea that “we all turn more conservative with age” is completely flawed and very likely completely made up to try to validate that insane ideology and act like conservatism is a wisdom we might gain with age.

Basically, don’t put that evil on me, Ricky Bobby. If you wanna go that way do not try and use others to excuse the poor, ignorant choice.

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Personally, I was at my most conservative in the fourth grade. Age has only pushed me to the left bit by bit. It seems the further along I was in my brain's development the less sense conservatism made.

Soup@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 47d

Yup. If you’re the kind to be intelligent then you’ll grow out of it with new information. If you’re the kind to be hateful you’ll grow into it with exposure to weak propaganda you still fall for.

MBech@feddit.dk · 10 pts · 48d

If anything I've grown way more socialist with age. Mostly through life experiences. I've been a construction worker, a construction manager and now a CAD Specialist. And through all that, I've seen the average worker get fucked over countless times, through wage theft, vacation theft, getting fired for standing up for health and safety, getting fired because the manager needed a scapegoat. All just in persuit of endless growth, to buy some CEO a 3rd vacation home in Turkey.

I've seen workers get nickled and dimed and downright cheated, after completing a job in record time, but the companies alway need more profit, no matter the human costs.

I haven't grown more conservative, I've grown angry at the capitalist system, and the only cure is complete ownership by the workers.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 48d (1 reply)

We all turn more conservative when we get older

Reagan Brain

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 48d

Good one!

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -8 pts · 49d (13 replies)

Watch there be a record low voter turn out this year as moderates don't want to vote for communists and left-wings are upset because the progressive candidate in general isn't the exact flavor of manic socialist dream politician that they wanted.

lokalhorst@feddit.org · 15 pts · 49d (6 replies)

It's almost like the 2 party system in the US garbage

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 2 pts · 49d (4 replies)

Yeah you have a party that actively hates us, our friends, our country and democracy itself and another one that isn't perfect so let's burn down the whole motherfucker right?

LuckyDevil@piefed.social · 10 pts · 49d (1 reply)

Both of your sentiments have truth to them. The solution is something like Ranked Choice Voting, no? Of course, we'd need enough representatives able and willing to implement that change.

bradinutah@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 48d

Too many of my fellow Americans fail to see how big of an impact the outdated plurality voting system is. They don't see how the math of plurality voting is ruining things, especially in serving the billionare Epstein Class instead of We the People. Reading about Duverger's Law and seeing how the wealthy exploit it is too boring for them. It's easier to get caught up in the D vs R puppet show than to find the roots of the problem and pull them out. Stop Plurality Voting in the US, state by state!

Zaktor@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 49d (1 reply)

It would be pretty absurd for centrists to see that choice and refuse to vote for the not perfect party, wouldn't it?

That's the comeuppance your first comment was fantasizing about isn't it?

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 0 pts · 49d

I wasn't dreaming of any comeuppance.

quick_snail@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 48d

One party*

But hopefully that'll change

PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 47d (2 replies)

Ain't that some bullshit that every time they win the primary I have to "hold my nose" and vote for their coprophagic ghoul, but when DSA sweeps the primary it's "damn, I hope you had fun driving away moderates"

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 0 pts · 47d (1 reply)

Most leftists don’t vote anyways.

hans@feddit.org · 1 pts · 47d

most people don't vote.

watson387@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 48d (2 replies)

Apparently a lot of people disagree with you, but sadly this is a highly possible outcome. It's also exactly how the far right propaganda machine will spin it.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 0 pts · 48d (1 reply)

People get butthurt when they hear the truth but someone has to say it in this echo chamber.

bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d

There are worse ways to earn a paycheck I guess.

SalamiDommie@lemmus.org · -16 pts · 48d (2 replies)

I'll vote MAGA before I vote for this.

Olhonestjim@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 48d (1 reply)

Ah the mating cry of the centrist liberal.

SalamiDommie@lemmus.org · -1 pts · 47d

Saw right through me ;)

I like you #namechecksout