He's one of the smartest youtubers I routinely watch. And yeah, crazy high testosterone, although you might never guess. I generally would assume someone with that much testosterone would have some facial hair.
im guessing he also has some degree of androgen insensitivity. having crazy high testosterone youd expect large muscles, lots of facial hair, male pattern baldness, a low voice, but hes not that big, has at least thin facial hair that he shaves, a full head of hair, and a relatively high voice. idk if any version of androgen insensitivity is associated with very high testosterone levels but i wouldn't be surprised.
Yes! Free oestrogen is not actually a particularly good thing if you’re not on antiandrogens and pointless if you are. E-maxxing is sadly money down the drain.
Might not have the hair for too long. Though you might. Depends on the tolerance for testosterone. Just know that high testosterone and baldness are highly correlated
You could also have a high tolerance for DHT, which is the metabolite of testosterone associated with hair loss.
In general though I think a lot of people focus very hard on the specific hormones, and typically they'll do what they say on the tin in standard doses. But there are a lot of edge cases. Higher or lower sensitivities, general proclivities, etc.
Before transitioning most people would've suspected I had very high T. I had a deep voice at a young age, built muscle fast, full beard as a teenager, the whole shebang minus baldness (but I transitioned young so that could just be time). But nope, my levels were average. I also responded fairly strongly to estrogen.
What's far more important than your numbers is if you're getting healthy and acceptable effects from your hormone levels. There's no need to mess with your levels unless there's need to mess with your levels.
Iirc, keeping or losing your hair as a guy has to do with DHT receptors in your hair follicles. T doesn't make your hair fall out, but DHT does, and your body produces more DHT as you get older (hence why finastride works as a hair loss inhibitor - it blocks DHT from the receptors in your hair). But only the hair on the top of your head is sensitive to this, with sensitivity higher in some places than others. Hence, some guys bald on the crown first, while some have a receding hairline first, and some never bald at all.
He has a very uncommon medical condition that he shared with his viewer base a while ago, largely because it had a serious impact on how often he was putting out videos for a while until he got it diagnosed
That's not how testosterone works. It's not fuel, it's just a signal. Everyone's neutral baseline is calibrated differently depending on developmental events mainly in the womb. It's not about how much absolute testosterone you have in a snapshot, it's about how much higher or lower you are than your own personal baseline. Your body will tend to maintain near your baseline, which might be much higher or lower than someone else's baseline, while "meaning" the same thing.
IIRC that’s why most labs require multiple samples but IANAMD.
Transient elevation is possible without long term aberrant effects, though the result will have to be explained to future doctors and insurance underwriters who will want to know if it was due to poorly-managed / self-administered HRT or an unchecked gonadal growth. If neither of those things, and no other symptoms present, it’s treated as normal.
He's posted very little on it. Last we heard they didn't find any cancers or anything and he wasn't really suffering from it. He had some strange symptoms and it it just came up in tests that didn't like up with what he was there for. But it was really really high.
one user says Luigi accomplished nothing, the other says Luigi got America talking and won a symbolic victory. both users throw personal insults at each other. this goes on for about 15 comments. sounds like you both wisely have them blocked
Thanks for the summary, I confirm I didn't see a thing, maybe my instance defederated from them (this is the speculation of someone who doesn't actually know how the fediverse actually works, so use a handful of salt)
Damn, poor little baby sure is jealous that Luigi got the entire US talking about the evils of private health insurance for weeks if not months and took down a mass-murderer.
Yeah totes wish I was getting locked up and watching the company I hated was hiring a new profit-focused CEO to continue its rollout of AI-powered claim review denying claims in record high amounts.
Hey, man, Luigi was fighting for you too; maybe with proper dental care, for example, you could finally have those boot polish stains removed from your teeth.
I dunno, that one CEO surely didn't think Mangione's alleged rage was very impotent, and all the other CEOs that got scared didn't think so, either. Unfortunately the American people let Luigi down, though
I sorta hear where you're coming from but I think for most people, someone getting out there and shooting someone is a million times more ballsy and proactive than we'll ever be. Agreed that it was misguided/naive though. I think it's hard to know what will actually bring about the much needed change.
No, actually, I can't think of any successful revolutions that have? Generally, the death or incarceration of a figurehead harms the movement dramatically.
That's not hard. Nelson Mandela, Václav Havel, José Mujica, Kim Dae-jung. I lived in Czechia under Havel and it was certainly the greatest moment in history I will ever experience. It still gives me hope for humanity.
Nelson Mandela died in 2013, though he is a good choice for being imprisoned for 27 years it is difficult to say that it in any way helped his cause since Apartheid lasted from the 1940s to 1994. He got a lot more done after being released in 1990 I tell you that much. It also didn't hurt to have people like POTUS Bill Clinton on his side.
Havel was cool but being the first and final president of Czechoslovakia isn't all that "revolutionary ".
Jose Mujica again a revolutionary in his youth and a normal politician in his later years.
Kim Dae-Jung...
Do you dudes have no idea what a successful revolution is? Because it isn't slow legislative reform. That's kind of the crux of the issue, all of these men had the sense to do what Luigi did not: pursue peaceful political reform and increase civillian engagement in democratic politics.
MLK, Nelson Mandela, Helen of Troy, the American revolution, the IRA, the entire history of Europe, the suffragettes, stonewall, Rosa parks, countless hunger strikers in prison, conscientious objectors throughout recorded history, Malcolm x, anyone persecuted under Jim crow, Rosa Luxembourg, Nadia Rumad. Off the top of my head.
You really asked if there are people from successful political movements who have been killed, had people make an attempt on their life, or were put in prison.
MLK Jr died in 1968, long after the civil rights act was signed into law.
George Washington did not die in the Revolution, idk where you heard that.
Helena as in the daughter of Zues? Okay pal.
The "suffragettes" generally refers to the WSPU which failed and disbanded in 1914 several years before some few women were allowed to vote in 1918 due to the efforts of different groups and more broadly in 1928.
How the fuck do you claim the entire IRA died but also accomplished a successful revolution?
The entirety of Europe? You think the entirety of Europe is currently dead?!
If you believe it is organic you can find over 115 of them right up there. Luigi Cultists, who reject the reality of his impact and substitute their own.
Though, given how hard it is to get that much engagement on a post much less a comment, it most certainly is not organic.
Okay sooo... what does your OP have to do with Senator Bernie Sanders again? It's not like it's impossible to support multiple paths of action, that's pretty par for the course in political movements. You shitting on one for not having immediate success just strikes as hypocritical and, ironically, not useful to the movement.
But those bots, oof yeah. big-luigi at it again siccing dozens of phoney Lemmy downvotes on poor, uh, you. If it wasn't for them then I and everyone else would probably agree with you.
If you become a Luigi Mangione you can never become a Bernie Sanders. Mutual exclusivity. Even if you become a political icon it will always be clear that you prefer the path of violence over all other action.
He was actually originally grey. That was a thing for a lot of Marvel characters in their early years; they kept wanting to do a grey character but they kept needing to change it. Happened to the Hulk, Iron Man and Beast.
It wasn't so much that they wanted a gray character; early printing just didn't do color all that well and a lot of characters started out gray because of printing errors.
This is a whole thing about clones and engineering a new body and mind transfers, the tldr is this is evil beast and he's made himself a new body with white fur for some reason
Oh okay. I missed that dark beast got a new body. I'm assuming dark beast (evil beast) is the same one from the AoA timeline.
I think I remember reading about Krakoa and Beast goes a little bit too evil with X-Force. Someone brings a beast from the past to talk sense into Krakoa beast. I haven't been reading the more recent runs.
I think there's a clear correlation there, but the axes are reversed: testosterone can't be the dependent variable of IQ score. Reversing the axes makes the gradient look incredibly steep, but that's only because of the obviously incorrect anomaly. r=0.435 is very much not a strong correlation, but it's not zero either, especially with a sample size this enormous.
My understanding is that 200 is pretty dire, would result in constant fatigue, struggle to build muscle, irritability, erectile dysfunction, low sex drive, etc.
i assume that it means people who are AMAB and never took sex hormones
data from hormonally transsexual people (most trans men and trans women, and some other transgender people) and from many intersex people (whenever the hormone balance is affected) would have many additional potential factors affecting controllability of variables and reliability
I read his autobios I guess 10-15 years ago and the misogyny felt weird. I was very much as McNeill described in the article: a young scientist who appreciated that someone could be a great in their field and fun, turning a blind eye to the dark side. I didn’t hear about the further shitty behaviour until now, but I didn’t really go looking.
Indeed, there’s no unlearning quantum physics; we should remember that achieving great things doesn’t make someone a good person.
Honestly, it could be a data point added because the researcher was getting really pissed off at the plotting software truncating the axis strangely. Normally you'd remove that after the fact, but...
Or it's a data oddity, like someone who specified units incorrectly (mg/mL) instead of (ug/L).
192 Comments
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 270 pts · 71d
That's styropyro:
ramenshaman@lemmy.world · 91 pts · 71d
He's one of the smartest youtubers I routinely watch. And yeah, crazy high testosterone, although you might never guess. I generally would assume someone with that much testosterone would have some facial hair.
applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 73 pts · 71d
im guessing he also has some degree of androgen insensitivity. having crazy high testosterone youd expect large muscles, lots of facial hair, male pattern baldness, a low voice, but hes not that big, has at least thin facial hair that he shaves, a full head of hair, and a relatively high voice. idk if any version of androgen insensitivity is associated with very high testosterone levels but i wouldn't be surprised.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net · 34 pts · 71d
Type 2 testobetes
MrSmith@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 70d
Actual High-T, low-E build: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-27-yr-old-male-with-aromatase-deficiency-with-permission-of-the-patient-to-reproduce_fig5_11005642
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 69d
Bro caught that Elon torso syndrome
imgcat@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 70d
these are just stereotypes
harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 38 pts · 71d
The lasers keep burning it off
MasterNerd@lemmy.zip · 20 pts · 70d
Dude's in his 30s but looks and sounds like a guy in his early 20s.
dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 70d
At that level of androgen, some of the androgen will be transformed into estrogen.
Source: I’m on hrt
nightlily@leminal.space · 5 pts · 70d
Yes! Free oestrogen is not actually a particularly good thing if you’re not on antiandrogens and pointless if you are. E-maxxing is sadly money down the drain.
emmy5482@quokk.au · 12 pts · 71d
Mostly you'd expect them to be bald
Shizzymcjizzles@fedinsfw.app · 7 pts · 71d
What does it mean if you have high testosterone and a lot of hair on your head? 😅
emmy5482@quokk.au · 15 pts · 71d
Might not have the hair for too long. Though you might. Depends on the tolerance for testosterone. Just know that high testosterone and baldness are highly correlated
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 70d
You could also have a high tolerance for DHT, which is the metabolite of testosterone associated with hair loss.
In general though I think a lot of people focus very hard on the specific hormones, and typically they'll do what they say on the tin in standard doses. But there are a lot of edge cases. Higher or lower sensitivities, general proclivities, etc.
Before transitioning most people would've suspected I had very high T. I had a deep voice at a young age, built muscle fast, full beard as a teenager, the whole shebang minus baldness (but I transitioned young so that could just be time). But nope, my levels were average. I also responded fairly strongly to estrogen.
What's far more important than your numbers is if you're getting healthy and acceptable effects from your hormone levels. There's no need to mess with your levels unless there's need to mess with your levels.
blarghly@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 70d
Iirc, keeping or losing your hair as a guy has to do with DHT receptors in your hair follicles. T doesn't make your hair fall out, but DHT does, and your body produces more DHT as you get older (hence why finastride works as a hair loss inhibitor - it blocks DHT from the receptors in your hair). But only the hair on the top of your head is sensitive to this, with sensitivity higher in some places than others. Hence, some guys bald on the crown first, while some have a receding hairline first, and some never bald at all.
Shizzymcjizzles@fedinsfw.app · 1 pts · 70d
I will never go bald. I have a proceeding hairline 🤣
Agent641@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 71d
How do you know what his testosterone levels is?
glibg10b@lemmy.zip · 25 pts · 71d
See the first video in the screenshot
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 70d
He has a very uncommon medical condition that he shared with his viewer base a while ago, largely because it had a serious impact on how often he was putting out videos for a while until he got it diagnosed
atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 71d
im pretty sure thats what the first video in the original comment is about
acockworkorange@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 70d
Integer overflow.
jerkface@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 69d
That's not how testosterone works. It's not fuel, it's just a signal. Everyone's neutral baseline is calibrated differently depending on developmental events mainly in the womb. It's not about how much absolute testosterone you have in a snapshot, it's about how much higher or lower you are than your own personal baseline. Your body will tend to maintain near your baseline, which might be much higher or lower than someone else's baseline, while "meaning" the same thing.
mal3oon@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 71d
I came to say this! OG madlad.
starik@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 69d
Poor thing can’t fully close his mouth.
Zkuld@lemmy.world · 238 pts · 71d
For your sins of axis-cropping, you shall be redeemed by reciting the periodic table thrice.
bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de · 57 pts · 71d
The only redemption is re-posting the full, properly cropped picture!
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de · 91 pts · 71d
Zerush@lemmy.ml · 23 pts · 70d
ErevanDB@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 70d
Shift the zone downwards quite a bit to be more accurate. Not many of them are high testosterone.
Zerush@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 70d
Well, there are a lot of rednecks with a circular family tree and more brain in their balls as in their head.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 69d
That's where they think they are. (They're also dumb enough to think that that is good.)
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 70d
Now, I can find where I’d probably project to be.
veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 68d
we need a community / magazine for badly cropped axises in the lemmyverse! (if there is not one already)
Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 155 pts · 71d
Pretty sure that's just StyroPyro.
bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 71d
Maybe the initial testosterone measurement was just wrong, I wonder of they repeated it. Broken device?
Septimaeus@infosec.pub · 13 pts · 70d
IIRC that’s why most labs require multiple samples but IANAMD.
Transient elevation is possible without long term aberrant effects, though the result will have to be explained to future doctors and insurance underwriters who will want to know if it was due to poorly-managed / self-administered HRT or an unchecked gonadal growth. If neither of those things, and no other symptoms present, it’s treated as normal.
Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip · 11 pts · 70d
I Am Not A Mouse Detective?
almost1337@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 70d
Medical Doctor
xzinik@feddit.cl · 3 pts · 68d
mouse doctor
rumba@lemmy.zip · 92 pts · 70d
styropyro
He has some mystery condition where his testosterone is super high... He's very smart, but maybe not quite there.
mavu@discuss.tchncs.de · 20 pts · 70d
high five, random internet poster. I came here to make a similar comment :)
Banana@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 70d
That's literally who I thought about and I'm so glad someone mentioned it. He's a freakishly smart dude.
sangeteria@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 70d
How is he now btw? Is he getting treated? Did they find a root cause?
rumba@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 70d
He's posted very little on it. Last we heard they didn't find any cancers or anything and he wasn't really suffering from it. He had some strange symptoms and it it just came up in tests that didn't like up with what he was there for. But it was really really high.
sangeteria@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 70d
Well, as long as it isn't negatively affecting him I guess. But I assume that he'll have to somewhat regularly monitor it with bloodwork checkups
rumba@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 70d
Yeah, we have to assume he's in good hands. No good to assume anything else
starman2112@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 69d
Tbh if you told me there's a STEM youtuber with worryingly high levels of testosterone, Styropyro would be my first guess
FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 80 pts · 71d
Luigi Mangione ?
tyranny@crazypeople.online · 17 pts · 71d
sorry all that happened to your comment
FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 70d
I didn't notice a thing... Is that the joke ?
tyranny@crazypeople.online · 2 pts · 70d
there are people arguing in the replies to your comment
Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 69d
Weird, can you give us a summary? I don't see it either.
tyranny@crazypeople.online · 2 pts · 69d
one user says Luigi accomplished nothing, the other says Luigi got America talking and won a symbolic victory. both users throw personal insults at each other. this goes on for about 15 comments. sounds like you both wisely have them blocked
Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 68d
That's crazy. Thank you for the play by play!
FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 68d
Thanks for the summary, I confirm I didn't see a thing, maybe my instance defederated from them (this is the speculation of someone who doesn't actually know how the fediverse actually works, so use a handful of salt)
veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 68d
Don't you mean the killer the feds mistook Luigi for?
FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 68d
I didn't say he killed anyone, he just looks good and is smart
veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 67d
Damn he does look good. I'd say inspirational, even.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -135 pts · 71d
The guy who killed a dude to accomplish no changes in the system he opposed and then went to prison for life?
Nah, I think he'd be on the other side of the chart.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 74 pts · 71d
Damn, poor little baby sure is jealous that Luigi got the entire US talking about the evils of private health insurance for weeks if not months and took down a mass-murderer.
What a little cockweasel you are.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -72 pts · 71d
Yeah totes wish I was getting locked up and watching the company I hated was hiring a new profit-focused CEO to continue its rollout of AI-powered claim review denying claims in record high amounts.
Sooo jelly
/s
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 52 pts · 71d
Hey, man, Luigi was fighting for you too; maybe with proper dental care, for example, you could finally have those boot polish stains removed from your teeth.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -66 pts · 71d
You're not opposing any boots yourself, shoeshine. You're doing fuck all to help anyone.
Just like Luigi: impotent rage incapable of bringing about change.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 71d
No one said I was, you illiterate fuck. That's why I don't shit on people who are.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -32 pts · 71d
Like who?
LostCarcosan@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 71d
I dunno, that one CEO surely didn't think Mangione's alleged rage was very impotent, and all the other CEOs that got scared didn't think so, either. Unfortunately the American people let Luigi down, though
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -16 pts · 71d
Scared? UHC aren't acting scared, that's for sure, they're ramping up automation to deny more claims.
beveradb@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 71d
I sorta hear where you're coming from but I think for most people, someone getting out there and shooting someone is a million times more ballsy and proactive than we'll ever be. Agreed that it was misguided/naive though. I think it's hard to know what will actually bring about the much needed change.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 2 pts · 71d
I'll take one more Bernie Sanders over a million idiots with guns.
StillAlive@piefed.world · 55 pts · 71d
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -45 pts · 71d
Oh no!
Anyways
Mantzy81@aussie.zone · 8 pts · 71d
All revolutions start with martyrs
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -30 pts · 71d
No, actually, I can't think of any successful revolutions that have? Generally, the death or incarceration of a figurehead harms the movement dramatically.
Coupable@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 71d
Wow look, ahistoric nonsense proven wrong by even the most cursory look at world history. How embarrassing.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -15 pts · 71d
Got an example to work with?
realitista@lemmus.org · 13 pts · 71d
That's not hard. Nelson Mandela, Václav Havel, José Mujica, Kim Dae-jung. I lived in Czechia under Havel and it was certainly the greatest moment in history I will ever experience. It still gives me hope for humanity.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -9 pts · 71d
Nelson Mandela died in 2013, though he is a good choice for being imprisoned for 27 years it is difficult to say that it in any way helped his cause since Apartheid lasted from the 1940s to 1994. He got a lot more done after being released in 1990 I tell you that much. It also didn't hurt to have people like POTUS Bill Clinton on his side.
Havel was cool but being the first and final president of Czechoslovakia isn't all that "revolutionary ".
Jose Mujica again a revolutionary in his youth and a normal politician in his later years.
Kim Dae-Jung...
Do you dudes have no idea what a successful revolution is? Because it isn't slow legislative reform. That's kind of the crux of the issue, all of these men had the sense to do what Luigi did not: pursue peaceful political reform and increase civillian engagement in democratic politics.
Coupable@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 71d
MLK, Nelson Mandela, Helen of Troy, the American revolution, the IRA, the entire history of Europe, the suffragettes, stonewall, Rosa parks, countless hunger strikers in prison, conscientious objectors throughout recorded history, Malcolm x, anyone persecuted under Jim crow, Rosa Luxembourg, Nadia Rumad. Off the top of my head.
You really asked if there are people from successful political movements who have been killed, had people make an attempt on their life, or were put in prison.
edit - cleaning up typos
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -12 pts · 71d
MLK Jr died in 1968, long after the civil rights act was signed into law.
George Washington did not die in the Revolution, idk where you heard that.
Helena as in the daughter of Zues? Okay pal.
The "suffragettes" generally refers to the WSPU which failed and disbanded in 1914 several years before some few women were allowed to vote in 1918 due to the efforts of different groups and more broadly in 1928.
How the fuck do you claim the entire IRA died but also accomplished a successful revolution?
The entirety of Europe? You think the entirety of Europe is currently dead?!
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 70d
Skipped the chapter on Easter Rising, didja?
Wataba@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 71d
As opposed to people who are being thrown in prison for wearing a black shirt?
Your argument has the consistency of a sieve in reality.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -12 pts · 71d
????
In what reality are those two things opposed?
You're saying if Luigi hadn't killed Brian that people in black shirts would be under arrest?
0ops@piefed.zip · 3 pts · 70d
P.S. put up or shut up, if the world needs more Bernies like you say than step the fuck up or get out of the fucking way.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -2 pts · 70d
People like Luigi Cultists are the ones in the way. They don't want Bernies. They don't want people participating in "the system". They want violence.
0ops@piefed.zip · 3 pts · 70d
Lol who is "they"? Got any examples?
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -1 pts · 70d
If you believe it is organic you can find over 115 of them right up there. Luigi Cultists, who reject the reality of his impact and substitute their own.
Though, given how hard it is to get that much engagement on a post much less a comment, it most certainly is not organic.
0ops@piefed.zip · 2 pts · 70d
Okay sooo... what does your OP have to do with Senator Bernie Sanders again? It's not like it's impossible to support multiple paths of action, that's pretty par for the course in political movements. You shitting on one for not having immediate success just strikes as hypocritical and, ironically, not useful to the movement.
But those bots, oof yeah. big-luigi at it again siccing dozens of phoney Lemmy downvotes on poor, uh, you. If it wasn't for them then I and everyone else would probably agree with you.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · -1 pts · 70d
If you become a Luigi Mangione you can never become a Bernie Sanders. Mutual exclusivity. Even if you become a political icon it will always be clear that you prefer the path of violence over all other action.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · -8 pts · 71d
lol too real to Lemmy to hear
Rookeh@startrek.website · 62 pts · 71d
Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works · 51 pts · 70d
I guess I'll just assume what the x axis is....
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz · 44 pts · 71d
That's Elon lying about both.
dumnezero@piefed.social · 39 pts · 71d
Henry McCoy
Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 70d
He isn't as blue as I remember. Is he using a new conditioner?
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 70d
He was actually originally grey. That was a thing for a lot of Marvel characters in their early years; they kept wanting to do a grey character but they kept needing to change it. Happened to the Hulk, Iron Man and Beast.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 8 pts · 70d
He was originally a normal looking dude.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 70d
It wasn't so much that they wanted a gray character; early printing just didn't do color all that well and a lot of characters started out gray because of printing errors.
argarath@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 70d
This is a whole thing about clones and engineering a new body and mind transfers, the tldr is this is evil beast and he's made himself a new body with white fur for some reason
Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 70d
Oh okay. I missed that dark beast got a new body. I'm assuming dark beast (evil beast) is the same one from the AoA timeline.
I think I remember reading about Krakoa and Beast goes a little bit too evil with X-Force. Someone brings a beast from the past to talk sense into Krakoa beast. I haven't been reading the more recent runs.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 70d
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 70d
What happened to his face?
FauxLiving@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 70d
A stressful residency
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 71d
davidagain@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 71d
If you remove the anomaly, which may be due to an accidental additional digit, that correlation coefficient may climb a bit.
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 70d
IMHO, they plotted an independent variable over random noise. The one gigathad changes nothing.
davidagain@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 70d
I think there's a clear correlation there, but the axes are reversed: testosterone can't be the dependent variable of IQ score. Reversing the axes makes the gradient look incredibly steep, but that's only because of the obviously incorrect anomaly. r=0.435 is very much not a strong correlation, but it's not zero either, especially with a sample size this enormous.
hypeerror@sh.itjust.works · 29 pts · 71d
Dolph Lundgren
hOrni@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 71d
In case anybody is wondering about this answer, here's Sly Stallone talking about Dolph:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0WBV1vvee0
M137@lemmy.today · 28 pts · 70d
That's just John Testosterone, we don't talk about him.
philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de · 18 pts · 70d
Professor John Testosterone.
morto@piefed.social · 24 pts · 71d
I laughed more that I was supposed to. We need a community just for funny outliers in charts!
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 71d
A com for fake data.
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 21 pts · 71d
Must be him
MintyFresh@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 70d
Obviously it's Brian Boitano
nathan@lemmy.permisuan.com · 18 pts · 71d
It's styropro
Psydefisch@sopuli.xyz · 18 pts · 70d
I bet on Dulph Lundgren
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 70d
Is it this guy? I've always imagined him as an erudite scholar.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 69d
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 70d
Dolph Lundgren?
Float@startrek.website · 11 pts · 71d
I feel bad for the dude near bottom left. 200 Test and 70 IQ, rough existence.
Mantzy81@aussie.zone · 21 pts · 71d
They all hang out at r/conservative
Frozengyro@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 71d
Hey, you leave those beta males trying to be alpha makes alone
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 70d
More like epsilon males.
thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 71d
how does low t give a rough existence???
Float@startrek.website · 5 pts · 71d
My understanding is that 200 is pretty dire, would result in constant fatigue, struggle to build muscle, irritability, erectile dysfunction, low sex drive, etc.
Happy to be educated if I misunderstand that.
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 70d
Because “manliness” rides a struggle bus. You might have to decide whether to gain muscle or sex, but both in a day is super exhausting???
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 10 pts · 71d
Henry Rollins
friendlycheese@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 70d
Not a real study but okay
Taleya@aussie.zone · 9 pts · 71d
That's Brian May
lb_o@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 70d
It is obviously John Carmack
nbsp@programming.dev · 8 pts · 71d
its that guy who took 300 covid vaccines.
SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 69d
And that man? Luigi
craftrabbit@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 71d
What are lifetime natural men?
M1k3y@discuss.tchncs.de · 12 pts · 71d
In this context probably people that did not get testosterone therapy.
craftrabbit@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 71d
Aah, that makes a lot of sense
thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 71d
i assume that it means people who are AMAB and never took sex hormones
data from hormonally transsexual people (most trans men and trans women, and some other transgender people) and from many intersex people (whenever the hormone balance is affected) would have many additional potential factors affecting controllability of variables and reliability
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 70d
Also nobody who ever took steroids or testosterone supplements.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 71d
Harrison Bergeron
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 1 pts · 71d
I am reminded about that story every time I get distracted and forget what I was doing.
merrickal@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 70d
He’ll blow your back out and cover you with his string theory.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 3 pts · 69d
A nerd who injected himself with testosterone to ace the "test"
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 70d
Oh, the Brendan Fraser in Bedazzled when he wished to be sophisticated, suave… Or Tony Stark.
Also, how did they get this data? Do they steal samples at night then check grades during the day?
microcapybara@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 71d
Richard Feynman?
duckythescientist@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 71d
Just gonna drop this off here just in case https://thebaffler.com/outbursts/surely-youre-a-creep-mr-feynman-mcneill
TIN@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 71d
I did not know that, thank you
duckythescientist@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 70d
Yeah 😞 I only learned about it this year too.
microcapybara@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 69d
I read his autobios I guess 10-15 years ago and the misogyny felt weird. I was very much as McNeill described in the article: a young scientist who appreciated that someone could be a great in their field and fun, turning a blind eye to the dark side. I didn’t hear about the further shitty behaviour until now, but I didn’t really go looking.
Indeed, there’s no unlearning quantum physics; we should remember that achieving great things doesn’t make someone a good person.
AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 71d
Pistcow@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 71d
RIP Barry Wood
brianary@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 69d
I was thinking Nick Offerman.
solidheron@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 70d
Hmmm, I wonder if testosterone keeps people from doing nerd shit like taking tests
YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 70d
Tests are fun as hell, are you really telling me it wouldn't be fun to take the LSAT and then not even apply to law school just to flex on everyone?
Asidonhopo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 69d
Obviously Conan O'Brien
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 71d
josephc@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 66d
Honestly, it could be a data point added because the researcher was getting really pissed off at the plotting software truncating the axis strangely. Normally you'd remove that after the fact, but...
Or it's a data oddity, like someone who specified units incorrectly (mg/mL) instead of (ug/L).
stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 69d
Grigori Perelman
Bonus@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 71d
Spermy McSpermface
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 1 pts · 71d
Saxton Hale.
drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 70d
SirHery@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 70d
ಠ_ಠ wha.. what do you mean? Genuinely what do you mean by that.
drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 70d
It's literally correlating testosterone with intelligence
OrteilGenou@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 70d
Chuck Norris, obviously
Canconda@lemmy.ca · -10 pts · 69d
It obviously has to be Chuck Norris
UsoSaito@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 69d
Henry Cavill
Canconda@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 69d
Ah yes his reincarnation. Follows Dali Lama rules apparently.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 69d
Chuck Norris is the toughest fish at Weenie Hut Jr's