I mean, can you name a movie she’s been in since Wonder Woman? Literally the last thing I can remember from her was the video of she put out during covid of celebrities looking for attention.
The only reason I heard about that movie is because it was so terrible and specifically Gal Gadot was called out for not being able to act at all and having sung a song whilst not being able to sing as well.
My school district hired a new superintendent last year. When he gave his introductory presentation, he included a bit about how AI was here to stay and we were just going to have to live with it and use it. Something that is objectively making kids dumber and the school super is completely on board with it.
Heh, my kid said that the school required that teachers play a presentation from the school board. The topic was that using AI was cheating, and not to do it. Also, they used AI to make the presentation.
Scotland has an absolutely god-tier PR game, passing themselves off as a victim of the nasty old English when they were a prolific colonising country too.
I’d like to think I’d cut people off if they joined the SAS, but is it the whole, assembled (with or without sauce) kebab or just the warm fillings? Because I kind of want to see what a whole kebab tastes like deep fried… /s
The change towards AI entertainment is inevitable, I for once can't wait for all that low quality crap that is release every year to be fully-AI so I can filter it out, and stuff with real artistic merit and passion becomes easier to find
stuff with real artistic merit and passion becomes easier to find
How so? Because there's going to be 10x more slop out there, none of it labeled as slop. And every safe space you have now will be invaded by slop pretending to be made by real people.
The cool thing is, once it's shown there is no market for abstract, disjointed, unhuman stories, everyone who is trying to push and normalize this will move on to the next carcass and try to feed or go back to selling stars or whatever.
you are thinking about tiktok hashtags or whatever, because that's not how databases work, they aren't made for clickbait and are maintained by turbonerds
Worst case scenario, I'll just decide on a cutoff date (probably somewhere between 2021 and 2029) and focus on stuff created before that date, which will contain almost all of the man-made media and none of the genAI slop.
There is a ton of really cool stuff I heard about for me to go through anyway. Video games alone should last me well past the Hayflick limit (hard limit for a human lifetime unless radical life extension breakthroughs happen). To say nothing of movies/anime, books/comics/manga, crafts, causes, etc...
I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.
Part if why ai is so overvalued is companies don't value my time. Slop won't fix that. I'm hooeful that ai agents allow us to filter out the junk we don't want. No more waiting on hold. No made searching online for deals and product reviews. Just agents parsing data that we want.
For entertainment, there was a shift when we moved from broadcast to digital as we could binge and not miss episodes. The rise of reality TV muddied the waters of quality and was the equivalent of ai slop. However those that preferred, avoided it.
Of course that won't be automatic. We're going to need open models, open training data and a great FOSS ecosystem around personal agents. We also need to make sure that the means of compute don't fall out of people's hands.
I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.
lol, no. It will learn what you like, sell that information to advertisers and governments, and then give you recommendations based on what the AI's billionaire owners want you to watch.
That's what i told my friend when they mentioned that their clanker recommended the most expensive stuff when asked. Sure, the top result from google will be given the priority, but when parameters can sneakily be adjusted to favour people who paid them, then we will never know what being recommended is an ad or not.
Yes, with openai, or Google. That's why I hope we can move more to FOSS agents. Currently, big tech uses our data against us to try and manipulate us.
With big data processing being more available, things like price checking and review checking can be automated. The problem is its always cat and mouse. Browser extensions started by finding you discount codes and automatically entering them. Then they started to mine your data and swap referral codes to theirs as they enshittified.
LLM's are here to stay nut they are not groundbreaking in the way businesses hope, replacing workers. They are useful in replacing tasks. They are just not consistently good at those tasks. They shift the cognitive effort in many cases. Well, we should use them to shift the effort back onto corporations.
Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally. That way your recommendations wouldn’t be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue. Instead, it would be something that actually serves your purposes.
Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally
Ignoring everything else, that wouldn't work. Your local llm instance, to recommend you new movies, would have to scour the internet to summarize information about them.
Boom, thats the vector of it getting steered towards greatest quarterly revenue.
Yeah that’s true. Search results, movie reviews and blogs definitely can be used to steer it in any direction. You just need to keep the LLM on a very short leash and keep a close eye on its diet. Takes some effort to do this properly.
If the goal is to say "hi, my local LLM, recommend me a new movie that I like, because god forbid I'll take a risk and grow", then you having to curate the data feed going into LLM to describe new movies is in practice this:
you'll have to find sources of data (websites, threads, communicties)
verify each and everyone for poisoning BEFORE adding to your deterministic vectorization (see what Netflix did for recommendation algorithm recently) and applying custom LLM-like in architecture model.
Tl;dr;
Either you can use LLM and will be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue
OR you have to put the same effort as if reading all reviews from multiple sources by yourself
And in both cases you still end up with the same outcome "maybe you'll like it" :P
Unless there are community based information sources. Adblock works mainly by blacklisting. Foss agents could use a combination of blacklisting and whitelisting in the same way. Yes, it takes effort, but spread over a community, it's minimal. In the days before internet, it meant buying a magazine or newspaper. There has always been a certain amount of effort to find reviews, other than word of mouth, which will continue.
Or even better, don’t be lazy and curate your own interests.
My high school motto was “Faber Quisque Fortunae” (each man creates their own destiny).
That means that You need to take responsibility for your own actions and decisions. You don’t outsource living.
Curating your own interests involves some aapect of information seeking. Llms can be used for that. It's not a case that anyone should trust ai to make a decision. It's that ai can help surface information to allow them to make a decision. The problem is too many people are letting the ai make a decision for them, or using it instead of other information that is better.
That's a problem that precedes llms. There used to be information online but it was normally informed. Since the social web, blogs, reviews, business reviews, Google reviews etc etc are packed so full of junk and nonsense that they are unhelpful.
The hope of the internet was to make information available to all. Spread ideas. Instead we as a species spread vapid half thoughts that drowns out the useful. LLMs are an extension of that and likely will make it much worse. But they can also be used to filter it.
The question is who decides which data is accurate and how do we verify that with these black boxes that are poorly understood by most of us.
Fuck I miss the time when I could just watch a movie and think "ooh that actress is hot", without having to consider their position on Israel or crypto.
1 Join the cult or you'll be out of the game.
2 Get on the train to Guyana or you'll be out of the game.
3 Drink the kool aid or you'll be out of the game.
So will she still be singing the same tune when AI steals her likeness and voice and begins producing feature length films without her consent or approval, and pays $0 in royalties, and gives no acknowledgement in the credits?
It's like bragging that you were first aboard a train with blown-out tracks and taunting the people who refused to get on.
Yeah I'm fine with getting left behind. I won't watch AI garbage movies.
Is this photo of her AI or if not what is wrong with her face? I can't put my finger on it but its off, it gives me sound garden / black hole sun vibes and the heebeejeebees somehow
Who in their right mind thinks a soulless smile is better than acknowledging the perfectly normal phenomenon that people's faces wrinkle when they laugh?
My take on all these people who defend AI with "it's here, get on board with it or get left behind" or "get used to it", etc. I've noticed a pattern. None of them actually use it as a tool. It's CEOs, it's "writers", "songwriters", "artists", etc. (please note the air quotes!).
The people who are defending the use, but shame anyone for calling out AI use or demanding disclosure (like Tim Sweeney), I see are looking to take as many shortcuts as possible, hoping to get rich, and don't want to admit it was any use of AI (because they want all the credit). They're trying to secretly outsource talent and profit from it.
She's one of those celebs that was basically foisted upon us by Hollywood producers and who regular people don't really like. She has the acting ability of a block of wood so she is doing anything she can to get attention and work.
Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke...
It's Gal Gadot. She's Israeli, served in the IOF, and has consistently been reaffirming her Zionist positions for however long she's been in the spotlight. She didn't just do a heel turn, she was born a heel and then she sprouted a couple more heels since.
🏖️please I will not buy your hog slop and I am stoked for the bubble to pop. They destroyed the movies for streaming but how far the aim they must be dreaming. Who the fuck is Gal thot
What a typical, uninspired, cynical lump of redundant protoplasm masquerading as a "creative." I take what she says every bit as seriously as I do any of the innumerable AI-generated commercials touting AI-generated solutions-in-search-of-a-problem. It stinks of a desperation, the likes of which I haven't smelled since the brief age of NFT's. They need you to buy into their grift, or else their investment falls through -- and you wouldn't want that, would you?
If you're going to subject yourself to that, make sure to yo-ho-ho and use a VPN so that you contribute as little as possible to any metrics that might encourage more of this trash.
Even if you for example, watch a bootleg version off of Youtube or similar, that data is still tracked and potentially even directly contributes to revenue in the case of a copyright strike.
147 Comments
Almacca@aussie.zone · 109 pts · 2d
Yeah, that's not career suicide at all. She'll be working with The Daily Wire next.
KnitWit@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 2d
I mean, can you name a movie she’s been in since Wonder Woman? Literally the last thing I can remember from her was the video of she put out during covid of celebrities looking for attention.
FluidBeef@quokk.au · 20 pts · 2d
She did some of those fake streaming blockbusters that no-one you know has ever watched or even heard of.
Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 2d
Apparently one of those is releasing today on amazon prime. Ohh how i wish i had amazon prime :(
Almacca@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 1d
I'm detecting a hint of sarcasm.
StillAlive@piefed.world · 17 pts · 2d
Did you forget the Disney movie she did? Dang, what was it called?
KnitWit@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2d
Haha, I did forget that one. Was it snow white? I remember hearing it didn’t do very well.
Thorry@feddit.org · 10 pts · 2d
The only reason I heard about that movie is because it was so terrible and specifically Gal Gadot was called out for not being able to act at all and having sung a song whilst not being able to sing as well.
Sharkticon@lemmy.zip · 94 pts · 2d
I'm trying to decide if the acting would be worse if it was the real Gal Gadot or an AI version...
magnetosphere@fedia.io · 40 pts · 2d
That is a surprisingly difficult question, yet also fun to think about!
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 13 pts · 2d
shes the physical manifestation of an AI generated woman, like "AVA" from all those posters, the male equivalent would be the rock.
AI would definitely be too human.
cecilkorik@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 2d
The Rock is at least funny sometimes. AI is incapable of anything resembling humor. I'd nominate Tom Cruise instead.
takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2d
How do we know she's actually real? ;)
OwOarchist@pawb.social · 75 pts · 2d
The train has left the station? Fine. That's definitely not the train I want to be on.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 30 pts · 2d
"The train has left the station, so I must profit immensely from it."
Peppycito@sh.itjust.works · 25 pts · 2d
That's the thing about trains if you miss one there won't be another one coming, ever.
OwOarchist@pawb.social · 16 pts · 2d
And, of course, they only ever go in one direction, with one destination.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
And that destination is into a brick wall. Now get on the damn train or miss out.
EnsignWashout@startrek.website · 1 pts · 2d
I do hate that about trains.
(Poe's Law disclaimer: This is meant as obvious "yes, and" absurdist humor.)
magnetosphere@fedia.io · 64 pts · 2d
I cannot wait for this to become a huge critical and commercial failure. It has the potential to give AI the massive setback it deserves.
Klear@piefed.world · 15 pts · 2d
It's gonna be an utter failure critically. It will make a shitton of money from people wanting to see how bad it is.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2d
That didn't help Supergirl.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
Her movies have all been flops recently.
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 59 pts · 2d
Crypto bros 🤝Slop sisters
"THIS IS THE FUTURE! GET ON BOARD OR GET LEFT BEHIND!"
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2d
My school district hired a new superintendent last year. When he gave his introductory presentation, he included a bit about how AI was here to stay and we were just going to have to live with it and use it. Something that is objectively making kids dumber and the school super is completely on board with it.
jj4211@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2d
Heh, my kid said that the school required that teachers play a presentation from the school board. The topic was that using AI was cheating, and not to do it. Also, they used AI to make the presentation.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2d
Too funny.
whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 2d
let them all go on this train and never come back please !
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 17 pts · 2d
"IT'S NOT A TRAIN, IT'S A HYPERLOOP POD CHAIN" - they, probably
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d
Let's let Musk and Trump personally oversee construction? Just trust me...
msage@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2d
Yes yes yes YES
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 9 pts · 2d
I want to be left behind so badly. I'm about to get a library card and just start reading books made before ChatGPT was ever a thing. Fuck everything
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
You don't have a library card? You've already been left behind by greatness!
kestrel7_7@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d
Having fun isn't hard
when you've got a library card
dumnezero@piefed.social · 2 pts · 2d
it's the same picture
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net · 47 pts · 2d
English people in 19th century China: Opium is inevitable. You're going to work with it or be left out of the game entirely.
FluidBeef@quokk.au · 8 pts · 2d
Just the evil English, obviously
https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/the-opium-wars-how-scottish-traders-fed-the-habit-2510684
mobyduck648@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2d
Scotland has an absolutely god-tier PR game, passing themselves off as a victim of the nasty old English when they were a prolific colonising country too.
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 10 pts · 2d
Scotland is the Austria of the UK
Jiral@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d
So everyone is hitting at them because they are easy and safe targets and you don't have to look into a mirror then?
FluidBeef@quokk.au · 6 pts · 2d
Right? And I say this as someone with a lot of Scots friends and family. They are demons who will deep fry your kebab and they’re all in the SAS.
idiomaddict@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
I’d like to think I’d cut people off if they joined the SAS, but is it the whole, assembled (with or without sauce) kebab or just the warm fillings? Because I kind of want to see what a whole kebab tastes like deep fried… /s
teslekova@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 2d
Whole fucken thing mate. It's a beautiful sight. Like a deep-fried pizza slice, or a deep-fried birthday cake, or yer mam's deep-fried removed.
likebudda@reddthat.com · 33 pts · 2d
She found a vehicle where her acting won't be the most artificial thing in the room.
FinalRemix@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d
Kalel no....
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 32 pts · 2d
The change towards AI entertainment is inevitable, I for once can't wait for all that low quality crap that is release every year to be fully-AI so I can filter it out, and stuff with real artistic merit and passion becomes easier to find
OwOarchist@pawb.social · 17 pts · 2d
How so? Because there's going to be 10x more slop out there, none of it labeled as slop. And every safe space you have now will be invaded by slop pretending to be made by real people.
pdxfed@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2d
The cool thing is, once it's shown there is no market for abstract, disjointed, unhuman stories, everyone who is trying to push and normalize this will move on to the next carcass and try to feed or go back to selling stars or whatever.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 2d
the no-slop will be labelled no-slop
OwOarchist@pawb.social · 7 pts · 2d
And so will the slop, because people will label things as whatever gets more eyeballs.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 2d
you are thinking about tiktok hashtags or whatever, because that's not how databases work, they aren't made for clickbait and are maintained by turbonerds
NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 2d
I got bad news for ya
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 2d
only if you don't know the lengths I go through to make my lists nor how familiar I am with movie/series databases :)
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social · 2 pts · 2d
Worst case scenario, I'll just decide on a cutoff date (probably somewhere between 2021 and 2029) and focus on stuff created before that date, which will contain almost all of the man-made media and none of the genAI slop.
There is a ton of really cool stuff I heard about for me to go through anyway. Video games alone should last me well past the Hayflick limit (hard limit for a human lifetime unless radical life extension breakthroughs happen). To say nothing of movies/anime, books/comics/manga, crafts, causes, etc...
hitmyspot@aussie.zone · -26 pts · 2d
I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.
Part if why ai is so overvalued is companies don't value my time. Slop won't fix that. I'm hooeful that ai agents allow us to filter out the junk we don't want. No more waiting on hold. No made searching online for deals and product reviews. Just agents parsing data that we want.
For entertainment, there was a shift when we moved from broadcast to digital as we could binge and not miss episodes. The rise of reality TV muddied the waters of quality and was the equivalent of ai slop. However those that preferred, avoided it.
Of course that won't be automatic. We're going to need open models, open training data and a great FOSS ecosystem around personal agents. We also need to make sure that the means of compute don't fall out of people's hands.
OwOarchist@pawb.social · 10 pts · 2d
lol, no. It will learn what you like, sell that information to advertisers and governments, and then give you recommendations based on what the AI's billionaire owners want you to watch.
psx_crab@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 2d
That's what i told my friend when they mentioned that their clanker recommended the most expensive stuff when asked. Sure, the top result from google will be given the priority, but when parameters can sneakily be adjusted to favour people who paid them, then we will never know what being recommended is an ad or not.
hitmyspot@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 2d
Yes, with openai, or Google. That's why I hope we can move more to FOSS agents. Currently, big tech uses our data against us to try and manipulate us.
With big data processing being more available, things like price checking and review checking can be automated. The problem is its always cat and mouse. Browser extensions started by finding you discount codes and automatically entering them. Then they started to mine your data and swap referral codes to theirs as they enshittified.
LLM's are here to stay nut they are not groundbreaking in the way businesses hope, replacing workers. They are useful in replacing tasks. They are just not consistently good at those tasks. They shift the cognitive effort in many cases. Well, we should use them to shift the effort back onto corporations.
chaosCruiser@futurology.today · 2 pts · 2d
Oh boy, did that rub everyone the wrong way.
Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally. That way your recommendations wouldn’t be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue. Instead, it would be something that actually serves your purposes.
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 2d
Ignoring everything else, that wouldn't work. Your local llm instance, to recommend you new movies, would have to scour the internet to summarize information about them.
Boom, thats the vector of it getting steered towards greatest quarterly revenue.
chaosCruiser@futurology.today · -1 pts · 2d
Yeah that’s true. Search results, movie reviews and blogs definitely can be used to steer it in any direction. You just need to keep the LLM on a very short leash and keep a close eye on its diet. Takes some effort to do this properly.
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 2d
That defeats the purpose then.
If the goal is to say "hi, my local LLM, recommend me a new movie that I like, because god forbid I'll take a risk and grow", then you having to curate the data feed going into LLM to describe new movies is in practice this:
Tl;dr;
Either you can use LLM and will be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue OR you have to put the same effort as if reading all reviews from multiple sources by yourself
And in both cases you still end up with the same outcome "maybe you'll like it" :P
hitmyspot@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 2d
Unless there are community based information sources. Adblock works mainly by blacklisting. Foss agents could use a combination of blacklisting and whitelisting in the same way. Yes, it takes effort, but spread over a community, it's minimal. In the days before internet, it meant buying a magazine or newspaper. There has always been a certain amount of effort to find reviews, other than word of mouth, which will continue.
Salvo@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 2d
Or even better, don’t be lazy and curate your own interests.
My high school motto was “Faber Quisque Fortunae” (each man creates their own destiny). That means that You need to take responsibility for your own actions and decisions. You don’t outsource living.
chaosCruiser@futurology.today · 2 pts · 2d
Absolutely. That’s the preferred way. Be active and put in the effort.
hitmyspot@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 2d
Curating your own interests involves some aapect of information seeking. Llms can be used for that. It's not a case that anyone should trust ai to make a decision. It's that ai can help surface information to allow them to make a decision. The problem is too many people are letting the ai make a decision for them, or using it instead of other information that is better.
Salvo@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 2d
Most of the raw information has been deliberately obfuscated in with malicious ads.
If we were able to dismantle the toxic malicious web advertising apparatus, we wouldn’t need them. At all!
hitmyspot@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 1d
That's a problem that precedes llms. There used to be information online but it was normally informed. Since the social web, blogs, reviews, business reviews, Google reviews etc etc are packed so full of junk and nonsense that they are unhelpful.
The hope of the internet was to make information available to all. Spread ideas. Instead we as a species spread vapid half thoughts that drowns out the useful. LLMs are an extension of that and likely will make it much worse. But they can also be used to filter it.
The question is who decides which data is accurate and how do we verify that with these black boxes that are poorly understood by most of us.
im_fine_sandy@nord.pub · 30 pts · 2d
Fuck I miss the time when I could just watch a movie and think "ooh that actress is hot", without having to consider their position on Israel or crypto.
AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2d
Simpler times
reddit_sux@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 2d
She is an Israeli agent, wouldn't expect anything less from her. Of course she would consider lives and contributions of others too be less valuable.
UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 2d
Zionist
davidgro@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 2d
Incredible. I chuckled at that first paragraph for being extreme satire. Then read the rest.
It's just not possible to outdo reality anymore.
RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 2d
I'm glad she's doing it so it's one step closer for her acting career to be over.
neo2478@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 2d
I mean, the AI "actors" will for sure have more screen presence and acting abilities than her.
Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works · 26 pts · 2d
JFC. Can we hear the thoughts of an actor that can actually act?
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org · 25 pts · 2d
I know what you're thinking, but what if a zionist made a movie about crypto?
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2d
You're so close to gold. I'd only add one tiny tweak: what if we let AI shit it out?
MidwestSolarpunk@slrpnk.net · 22 pts · 2d
It’s like if someone asked AI to make the least desirable movie.
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 22 pts · 2d
Gal Gadot looks AI generated herself.
Bloodyhog@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2d
AI these days can generate a wider spectrum of emotions than this lady. So that could be advantageous for her.
slaacaa@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 2d
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 2d
I'm sure this is going to be a stunning masterpiece of cinematic art.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 6 pts · 2d
Oh it is. Just not in the way its authors intended.
Snapz@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 2d
Now that I've invented the bank robbing robot, the bank robbing robot is inevitable...
victorz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 14h
Welp, saving that picture for later. 🎯
ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world · 19 pts · 2d
1 Join the cult or you'll be out of the game.
2 Get on the train to Guyana or you'll be out of the game.
3 Drink the kool aid or you'll be out of the game.
RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 2d
Support the genocide or you'll be out of the game
drolex@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 2d
I think that if you take a train to Guyana, you must already be in Guyana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railways_in_Guyana
ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world · 2 pts · 2d
A plane doesn't align with her quote, but you are technically correct, which, I suppose, is the best kind of correct.
Furbag@pawb.social · 19 pts · 2d
So will she still be singing the same tune when AI steals her likeness and voice and begins producing feature length films without her consent or approval, and pays $0 in royalties, and gives no acknowledgement in the credits?
It's like bragging that you were first aboard a train with blown-out tracks and taunting the people who refused to get on.
Yeah I'm fine with getting left behind. I won't watch AI garbage movies.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 2d
Is this photo of her AI or if not what is wrong with her face? I can't put my finger on it but its off, it gives me sound garden / black hole sun vibes and the heebeejeebees somehow
Crazazy@feddit.nl · 15 pts · 2d
Perhaps it's her trying to smile without showing any wrinkles on her face. I think it's a learned technique
luciferofastora@feddit.org · 12 pts · 2d
Who in their right mind thinks a soulless smile is better than acknowledging the perfectly normal phenomenon that people's faces wrinkle when they laugh?
God, those ghouls make my skin crawl
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2d
Botox and fillers.
bobbosr2004@piefed.social · 2 pts · 2d
Sort of human uncanny valley
CaptPretentious@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 2d
My take on all these people who defend AI with "it's here, get on board with it or get left behind" or "get used to it", etc. I've noticed a pattern. None of them actually use it as a tool. It's CEOs, it's "writers", "songwriters", "artists", etc. (please note the air quotes!).
The people who are defending the use, but shame anyone for calling out AI use or demanding disclosure (like Tim Sweeney), I see are looking to take as many shortcuts as possible, hoping to get rich, and don't want to admit it was any use of AI (because they want all the credit). They're trying to secretly outsource talent and profit from it.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 16 pts · 2d
do you though?
Bluewing@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 2d
Yeah like most actors, she's never struck me as the brightest bulb in the box.
teslekova@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 2d
Oh no she Gina Carranoed herself!
What a shame. How sad for such a proud IDF ambassador.
laughs forever
victorz@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 14h
She's a Zionist?
echodot@feddit.uk · 13 pts · 2d
She's welcome to her train because I'm reasonably confident that within 18 months it's going to have exploded.
She's certainly picked a hill to die on and I'm quite happy to indulge her.
cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 2d
She's one of those celebs that was basically foisted upon us by Hollywood producers and who regular people don't really like. She has the acting ability of a block of wood so she is doing anything she can to get attention and work.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2d
I hope every set artist and lighting tech refuses to work with her in the future.
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 1d
Good. I hate the fucking game and its players.
ChetManly@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2d
What did she do to her face?
Verqix@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2d
Maybe some AI generated lighting
pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 2d
Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke. Do not make the train joke...
ramenshaman@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2d
Make the train joke
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2d
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
At least AI Gal will make the trains run on time.
pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 2d
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 2d
She'll be joining Denise Richards career path soon.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 2d
Oh no, what did she do?
lepthesr@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2d
Think he's referencing OF
destructdisc@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2d
You're telling me nuclear scientist Dr. Christmas Jones has an OF?
lepthesr@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1d
baggachipz@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 2d
Ugh, that’s terrible! Where is it so I can make sure not to go there?
100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it · 10 pts · 2d
athatet@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 2d
Kalel no 😐
nightlily@leminal.space · 3 pts · 2d
Gal‘El, no!
Nalivai@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2d
Of all the people who wouldn't surprise me with a stance like that, she doesn't surprise me the most.
ramenshaman@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2d
lechekaflan@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2d
Another good reason absolutely not to be emotionally invested in celebrities, because at anytime they'll just do a heel turn.
This silly woman now believing in every word Yahoo and Ben Butcher says to further their lebensraum.
destructdisc@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 2d
It's Gal Gadot. She's Israeli, served in the IOF, and has consistently been reaffirming her Zionist positions for however long she's been in the spotlight. She didn't just do a heel turn, she was born a heel and then she sprouted a couple more heels since.
lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
I cannot possibly up-doot this enough
Soggy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
Being born in Israel isn't a moral failing, but the rest is on point.
lechekaflan@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
I know who she is, Israelis believing they're so exceptional.
Shamber@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1d
Isn't she AI generated herself? I didn't think it was possible to be that awful both as an actor and as a human, and yet here we are
Eternal192@anarchist.nexus · 8 pts · 2d
She can't act anyway and even AI might not be enough to help her.
the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
She seems like the $5 dollar bargin bin at the dollar store.
antianarchist@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 2d
I hope the AI version of her looks better than the botched surgeries.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
It's like her ugly insides are oozing outward.
the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 2d
🏖️please I will not buy your hog slop and I am stoked for the bubble to pop. They destroyed the movies for streaming but how far the aim they must be dreaming. Who the fuck is Gal thot
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 6 pts · 2d
Triple feature with Battlefield Earth and one of the Atlas Shrugged films half-heartedly churned out by some libertarians who bought the rights
bcgm3@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2d
Gal Godot Gal-Ga-fucking-sucks.
What a typical, uninspired, cynical lump of redundant protoplasm masquerading as a "creative." I take what she says every bit as seriously as I do any of the innumerable AI-generated commercials touting AI-generated solutions-in-search-of-a-problem. It stinks of a desperation, the likes of which I haven't smelled since the brief age of NFT's. They need you to buy into their grift, or else their investment falls through -- and you wouldn't want that, would you?
(I absolutely would)
FluidBeef@quokk.au · 6 pts · 2d
Did Doug Liman get canceled? He never seemed like someone to do a career scrapheap move like this, so I can only assume he did something terrible.
leviathan@feddit.org · 6 pts · 2d
Better Title: A Bitcoin movie using Gal Godot + AI
KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 2d
gal godot made me think of the 90s gender segregated electronics
MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2d
I'm happy to be out of the game completely.
Have you seen Shrek Retold? Or Scott the Wozz Internet and You? There's fan made videos better than Hollywood movies
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 2d
Sounds like collaborator talk from Gal Gadot.
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 2d
wow
BaroqueW@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d
Kamoulox
FE80@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
This bitch sounds like Tommy Wiseau and acts about as well as him.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 2d
https://illumin.usc.edu/the-volume-how-the-mandalorian-revolutionized-filmmaking/
pretty obv where AI was headed, we already moved set design to mostly digital.
nightlily@leminal.space · 1 pts · 2d
ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 2d
Will I support it? No.
Do I think she is a terrible person? Yes.
Will I watch the movie? Probably, due yo curiosity.
Will I enjoy the movie as a quality product? Probably no.
Will I pay to watch it? Hell no.
Omgpwnies@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d
If you're going to subject yourself to that, make sure to yo-ho-ho and use a VPN so that you contribute as little as possible to any metrics that might encourage more of this trash.
Even if you for example, watch a bootleg version off of Youtube or similar, that data is still tracked and potentially even directly contributes to revenue in the case of a copyright strike.
ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 2d