Opening my weather app this morning I was greeted by this warning:
Google has announced that, starting in 2026/2027, all apps on certified Android devices will require the developer to submit personal identity details directly to Google. Since the developers of this app do not agree to this requirement, this app will no longer work on certified Android devices after that time.
It's the first time I hear about this, seems to be about:
Cirrus app: Github
Was this a big thing I somehow missed? I hope more devs will follow suit.

112 Comments
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website · 149 pts · 341d
Yes, you must have missed it. And so it begins.
Google is moving to make Android less open source. I'm not sure more devs following suit is going be good for them or their users. The G doesn't give an F.
What we need is an OS fork that gets maintained. If not that, some other workaround that fools the Google servers. Because you can bet money that nobody made from flesh and blood is going to look at this inside Google.
Maybe devs can band together and form Middle Finger Corp. and designate one willing person as their contact to serve as registered dev for a gazillion apps. Follow the letter of the law, not the misguided spirit of it, in a manner of speaking.
If you are sitting on a mobile OS and you were afraid to fail like Windows, maybe now is the time to give it a go?
pibfyhd7g57gd5u64f@piefed.social · 56 pts · 341d
GrapheneOS
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 28 pts · 341d
e/OS too, if Graphene fails or isn't available. Or Murena.
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 341d
Murena has had questionable policies....
Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de · 9 pts · 341d
And what policies would that be?
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -29 pts · 341d
Kids these days won't search answers on the internet...
BaroqueInMind@piefed.social · 26 pts · 341d
I'm an adult, and promise you I've been using computers longer than you've been alive, and I still don't care to waste what little time I have on this planet to look into shit that sounds completely made-up.
Put up, or shut up.
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -11 pts · 341d
Kids these days is a classic thing to say. Nowadays it doesn't impjy that the listener is a kid
Edit: I can offer you https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114880919351954282 and https://sopuli.xyz/post/21908818
queermunist@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 341d
I searched for Murena's policies and found a privacy policy page, and it seems fine?? You give them information for transactions, they don't sell your information, and you can delete your account which will delete the information they have on you.
What more do you want?
Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 340d
You're the one stating something as a fact, so you should have already provided the sources for your claims, especially if its something not in the major consensus nareative...
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 341d
bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 340d
Pixels. That's it.
cdzero@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 340d
Hopefully this leads to a lot more development of and for Ubuntu Touch. Biggest issues it faces are lack of compatibility and lack of apps. I think the core is solid though. I used it for a week when switching from iOS (so no Android background) and enjoyed it, but a few too many minor issues built up and I ended up going to Calyx.
Ulrich@feddit.org · 117 pts · 341d
They're not "pulling" the app from anywhere, it's just simply not going to work on "certified devices". This is the end of Android as we know. It's been a good run.
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 19 pts · 341d
Yes you're right. I've worded that wrong in the title!
Ulrich@feddit.org · 13 pts · 341d
You can edit it 🙂
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 27 pts · 341d
Done! for the curious, original title, "Cirrus App dev pulling app from certified android devices in '26/'27" new, "Cirrus app dev informing the app will stop working on certified android devices in '26/'27"
wolfiedafloof@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 341d
When one thing dies, another thing is born.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 341d
UBPorts is ready to go and isn’t tied to Google hardware like Graphene.
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 341d
Doesn’t have manufacturer support
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 341d
Volla, Fairphone, and Pine offer devices with it preinstalled and it works on a wide variety of others.
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 341d
I think you’re aware of the size of those manufacturers compared to the ones shipping Android.
freedickpics@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 339d
It's also absurdly lacking in features compared to Android/iOS (never mind app support) and the dev team is so small they can barely maintain existing device support. VoLTE is still unsupported in the majority of devices. The OS doesn't even have basic security features like drive encryption
I like UBPorts a lot but I think the alternative/FOSS smartphone market is too fragmented between it and SailfishOS/PostMarketOS that none of them will emerge with enough adoption to be real competitors to the iOS/Android duopoly. Didn't mean to be overly negative. Just my two cents
Ulrich@feddit.org · 4 pts · 341d
And what's being born?
Imad@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 340d
Rustan@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 341d
Only works for those of us who own a pixel or bought one for the reason but this won't effect Graphene users
tiramichu@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 341d
Except it will, because developers aren't going to bother maintaining an app where the install base is just pixel users with Graphene
pogmommy@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 341d
Yep. We'll be fine for a while but Google's seriously axing the platform for foss projects and security-minded users. In no more than half a decade I anticipate Android's open-source development scene will begin looking very similar to Apple's.
Auli@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 338d
Why if it isn't on the app store the install base is already insanely small. People who sideload are not the majority.
Ulrich@feddit.org · 9 pts · 341d
It's going to affect 100% of Android users because no one is going to develop apps just for the 10 people using uncertified devices.
cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 341d
We're at least a dozen!
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 341d
affect
Auli@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 341d
I believe you can sideload with ADB.
vodka@feddit.org · 13 pts · 341d
Nope, from how Google puts it, play services will block any and all apps without a valid signature from working at all on play certified devices.
You'll be able to install them via adb probably, but when you run them play services will stop you.
Play services already prevents certain apps from starting until you say a yes/no on a popup, so the framework for this is already in place.
Mubelotix@jlai.lu · 3 pts · 340d
This is completely wrong. I asked this exact question to google in their poll and I got an answer from them saying it would always work with adb. It's for devs so you can run those apps of course. This means F-Droid can implement a Shizuku backend to install apps and the UX will be even better since it will bypass popups. However, initial setup will be far more complicated
Ulrich@feddit.org · 0 pts · 341d
You can but that's REALLY not a solution. How many times/day to plan on plugging in your phone and running a couple dozen commands to update your apps?
blimp@lemmy.world · 80 pts · 341d
It is a big thing at least in developer circles. It made the front page of Hacker News multiple times.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45087396
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45256651
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082750
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 17 pts · 341d
Thank you for these links they are fantastic! I was aware of the procedural lock in via play integrity services and also the lockdown on side loading so that didn't get past me, but I wasn't aware google also wants to alienate developers now by requiring ID. It seems to me google want to now fully commercialize the platform, transforming it into the ad infested network that web2+3.0 already became. I think their plan, by alienating non commercial devs, is that all apps will run on their ad models and non without them will be left.
mat@linux.community · 58 pts · 341d
I'm going to look into adding this to my app https://git.allpurposem.at/mat/Sudoku Indeed I do not agree with this, so it will become unavailable when the terms go into effect. I will look into making it available for Linux Mobile.
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 30 pts · 341d
First of all thank you for providing a foss app!
I think it's a big difference if the platform tolerates you or actively wants to stop you from doing it. You got my fullest sympathy.
mat@linux.community · 15 pts · 341d
Thank you so much for the kind words! It's indeed a bad time to be an app delevoper. At least the framework I use is portable-ish, so the work won't be fully lost.
Babalugats@feddit.uk · 56 pts · 341d
And so it continues... Google trying to shoehorn themselves into a position of authority of the internet. Imagine they get as much sway as the banks now have? Private entities controlling the masses for massive profits. Fuck off Google.
Ugurcan@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 341d
Wording of the message implies it’s possible to have uncertified version of Android… Such a thing possible?
unixcat@lemmy.world · 68 pts · 341d
Yes, like GrapheneOS
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 44 pts · 341d
any version of android that's not vendor or downloaded from the official android website
calyxos.org (paused)SoulKaribou@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 340d
Adding iodé to the list, cocorico !
https://iode.tech/iodeos/
Why everybody always forget about iodé ?
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 340d
first time I hear about it, seems to be based on lineageOS?
What's with the premium tiers? Seems a bit sketchy to be honest.
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 341d
DacoTaco@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 341d
Yes, think cheap android tablets that are so shit google store can barely run on it. Those devices are usually chinese knockoffs and do not ship with google services, google store or any gapps.
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 341d
I don't believe the certified android means hardware, I believe it's only about if you have an official android build running, since if your hardware can run a custom ROM, you can get around this issue.
DacoTaco@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 341d
I think it has to do with the google certification you have to go through to sell hardware shipping with android. All devices need to be certified by google or they are not allowed to run gapps or connect to the playstore. This is what huawei lost after trump banned them, so they had to make their own shit as a replacement
fodor@lemmy.zip · 39 pts · 341d
Ulrich@feddit.org · 39 pts · 341d
Google just came out of the biggest antitrust suit since 1998 completely unscathed so you can expect this sort of anticompetitive measures to continue.
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 14 pts · 341d
Aaand the reason's called ✨c o r r u p t i o n ✨
Whenever a politician comes from a big company or goes to one after retiring from politics, that's when you know they've been bribed.
Ulrich@feddit.org · 4 pts · 341d
I mean when the entire tech industry has front row seats at your inauguration, that's a pretty good indicator as well.
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 341d
oeuf@slrpnk.net · 26 pts · 341d
Just to clarify:
Will my apps installed from F-droid be unaffected by this?
arthur@lemmy.zip · 42 pts · 341d
Even apps installed outside the Play Store will need to have a "verified developer", and this change will affect any devices that use Google Play Services, so it will be a problem even to old devices.
oeuf@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 341d
I don't personally have Google Play Services installed but I can see how devastating this could be to open source on Android.
muhyb@programming.dev · 26 pts · 341d
If you don't have Google Play Services installed, then you're not affected. Of course, how many custom ROMs will live to that day is unknown.
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 341d
The Mihon dev team has already announced that they're going to get authorized and continue their work.
It's... an interesting choice given what they're working on, but they also took steps to stay legal
didnt1able@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 341d
There won't be Fdroid on Google OS phones period
DrDystopia@lemy.lol · 15 pts · 341d
From what I gather, yes. But will you be allowed to install F-Droid? No.
KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 341d
I've heard that it will still be possible to install unverified apps via ADB, so theoretically it wouldn't be hard to make an app installer that uses Shizuku (tool that allows you to ADB into your own device) and have a website that automatically installs that using WebUSB or something
vodka@feddit.org · 11 pts · 341d
You'll be able to install them, but play services will very probably stop them from starting.
They already have the framework for this in place, "unrecognised" apps get blocked by Play services already asking you if Google can scan the app before you start it, the app will not start at all unless you click yes or no.
daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 341d
Maybe yes. Maybe not. I think from now they won't push that far, among other things because even developing for android platform would become a burden. Not being able to even test some app concept without a verified signature...
Maybe eventually they'll go that far. But as of now I do think is unlikely they'll completely block the adb way.
Anyway many current users won't go adb. And third party stores will take a massive hit. That's google's goal.
MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 341d
Unclear, but they are saying it will affect side-loaded apps, and no way to bypass with Developer Options, so I would assume so.
Ulrich@feddit.org · 2 pts · 341d
Depends on your OS. Most likely no.
plyth@feddit.org · 21 pts · 340d
It's one of the many small things that hide the big thing. In 2027 android will be fully locked down, unnecessarily.
The big thing is whatever the lockdown is for.
Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 21 pts · 341d
Would people be able to circumvent this by downgrading their version of Google Play Services? ..or not updating it in the first place?
daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 27 pts · 341d
I think you could still adb install unverified apps into your phone.
That untill they'll block that path too.
Also I suppose that you'll need to adb every update. So apps that would want to go this way should self check updates instead of relying on an external store.
pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe · 2 pts · 341d
What's adb?
daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 341d
Android Debug Bridge. It is a way to control the device via command line, mainly from an external computer. Among other things allows for app installation. It's one of the main ways to test and debug apps while being developed.
pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe · 2 pts · 341d
Oh okay, thanks.
flyhunter@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 340d
Do you think obtanium + shizuku could help uptating the apps with less attrition?
EddoWagt@feddit.nl · 5 pts · 341d
They're baking this right in the package installer of android, it goes beyond play services. I have my doubts that this will pass in the EU
Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 341d
But that begs the same question. If you never update your existing phone with google's malware, you should be ok.
Obviously if you buy a new phone that's already infected you're screwed unless you can flash a new ROM on there.
My point is. People's current phones do not have this malware on it yet. If you disable updates and/or degoogle, your device should continue to work as is. Perhaps without being able to use Google Play Store, but honestly that's not huge loss for anyone that cares about this stuff in the first place.
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 341d
True, but using a phone and never updating it likely leaves you open to other malware/attacks sadly.
Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 341d
That's a bet I would rather take given the alternative.
I don't want any big tech shit on any of my devices. Microsoft, Google, Meta, X, etc can all eat a dick. I have zero trust in any of em.
descartador@lemmy.eco.br · 5 pts · 341d
Don't think so, bud
Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 340d
This news makes me actually sad. I have had high hopes in the last years in the FOSS world, having myself and three other persons move to use Linux as daily driver on Desktop/Laptop.
My phone has FOSS apps only except for banking, health, transport tickets and 2/3 work rekated stuff. My messaging, files and pictures are handled by FOSS apps installed from third parties (F-Droid, Obtainium) on selfhosted servers... I was finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.
This news sound to me like the tunnel ahaead is collapsing.
kokesh@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 341d
We'll be able to install via adb hopefully.
Telorand@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 341d
From what I've seen elsewhere, yes.
adbsideloading will still be possible, but that adds a level of inconvenience many people will not enjoy, especially since FDroid and similar have been so easy.Dumhuvud@programming.dev · 2 pts · 340d
Install, maybe. What about updates though? Do you plan to pull out
adbfor each and every one of them? Or would you rather keep using old, potentially insecure, versions?kokesh@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 340d
Obviously that is not an ideal solution, but better than nothing, right?
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 341d
HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 341d
How easy is it to convert an Android app to a Linux mobile app of you're the developer? If it's written in JVM languages it shouldn't be that hard right?
nomadjoanne@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 341d
Just use a custom ROM. This sadly will affect app developers. But if you are on a custom ROM without GMS it will continue to work just fine.
HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 341d
Google is trying to kill custom ROMs too. Also I thought the majority of modern phones aren't bootloader unlockable.
MML@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 340d
You can unlock the bootloader on just about every phone, just depends on how much effort you want to spend.
nomadjoanne@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 340d
Ehhhh... sorta maybe. Ultimately they can't, but they can make development more difficult.
Also Google has nothing to do with whether or not you're bootloader is unlockable. Get a phone that is.
If you rally want to go down the whole FOSS path it does ultimately become a bit of a lifestyle.
Ephera@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 340d
End-users can use e.g. waydro.id to run Android apps on Linux.
I'm not deep into Android development, but I doubt it's possible to just port an app without basically a complete rewrite. Android has an own layer on top of the JVM, called Zygote, and there's presumably lots of system libraries which the Android apps implicitly depend on, for handling graphics and whatnot, which make tons of assumptions about running on an Android device.
Imad@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 340d
xiao@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 341d
Or https://f-droid.org/packages/org.woheller69.omweather
MOARbid1@piefed.social · 5 pts · 341d
I've only ever used Android, dating back to the T-Mobile G1. I think I'm now ready to switch to iPhone. If I'm going to be pigeonholed into a completely walled garden, it might as well be with a company that knows what they are doing.
I really don't want to switch, but probably will for my next upgrade.
Steve@communick.news · 22 pts · 341d
Screw that!
Get a Fairphone with /e/OS before you switch to the rotten apple.
MOARbid1@piefed.social · 14 pts · 341d
I absolutely get what you're saying, and a good part of me agrees with you. Here is the thing, I'm tired boss. I've made an effort my whole life to use open source, privacy friendly everything.
I'm now to the point where I don't have time for messing with phones. Fixing broken stuff, compatibility, etc etc.
I need a powerful phone with a great camera that just works.
Steve@communick.news · 1 pts · 341d
I hear that. I finally gave in and bought an electric spy-mobile.
Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 341d
But be warned, the camera app is borked (at least on the FP6)
cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 341d
I switched to iPhone in 2016. I had no idea Pixel was coming, and my choices all sucked. The more I looked at the iPhone 6s, the more I realized it was the right phone at that time.
I’m now on my fourth iPhone and I’m kind of done with them. “Apple Intelligence” and the keyboard gets so many things wrong. On a 16 Pro Max. And yet my Galaxy S10 which is 5 years older gets almost nothing wrong.
iPhones have great screens and the newest Snapdragon barely catches up to the new iPhone chip. But I think it does more. The Pixel chip is much further behind (comparable to an iPhone 11, I hear) but even that phone seems smarter.
I feel like iPhones are really nice basic/feature phones. They work well with my Macs, but Macs don’t stop working if your phone runs Android. They just don’t play well together.
Apple is a lot better on privacy. They never pretended to be or care about open source though. iOS is based on macOS which is certified UNIX; Android is Linux more or less but neither is open. I think it's a moot point at best and a bullshit non-point most days. Open source I mean. As far as privacy, I think Apple is better on a good day but maybe misleading, but Google never really pretended to care. The deal was always, premium stuff for your personal data. We just didn’t care as much back then.
Honestly there are no great options. If I had to buy a phone right now, I’d probably get a Galaxy S25. I just hate what’s going on with Nova Launcher. But I love using my S10, it’s just a dated screen at this point.
DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 341d
Don't forget that CUPS (the thing that lets you print easily on Linux) is also funded and developed by Apple.
Ulrich@feddit.org · 1 pts · 341d
Honestly considering the same. Sideloading is the only reason to stick with Android and that's now going away. Apple devices have more power, better battery life, better displays, etc etc etc. Especially considering the "base" 17 is now actually a really good value while Pixel prices have skyrocketed in recent years to iPhone levels (presumably for AI shit I don't even want).
MOARbid1@piefed.social · -1 pts · 341d
I was also looking at the 17, and it looks like a great option. A 16 pro might also be a good option
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 341d
Mubelotix@jlai.lu · 5 pts · 341d
Wait you could install arbitrary apks on android tv?
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 340d
polle@feddit.org · 3 pts · 340d
You have an android tv and not smarttube? Your youtube experience will increase ALOT.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · -3 pts · 340d
A lot. Two words. You don't write alittle, do you?
Valmond@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 340d
What a Huge Nerd thing to say.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 340d
Wellplayed.
polle@feddit.org · 1 pts · 340d
I am dyslexic and not a native speaker, but thanks for the correction! The example with a alittle is actually a good one. If you loose the unfriendly vibe, your comment would be more appreciated.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 340d
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html
cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 341d
biotin7@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 340d
Where are you linux hardware manufacturers ?
Imad@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 340d
biotin7@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 340d
Imad@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 340d
Ertain@mast.linuxgamecast.com · 1 pts · 340d
@Akip I got this message the other day. It sucks how the app won't work on certified devices next year.
Akip@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 340d
Agreed. Google just didn't consent to you getting an app without ads. My hope is maybe we can circumvent it for a while with PWA or browser website bookmarks. Maybe long enough for alternatives to arrive or consumer protection to kick in. I refuse to give up hope even though I might need to abandon android. For now I guess I will just not buy another phone since androids time seems limited. Really hard to find something to recommend to family and friends that just works. My goto grapheneOS also seems more and more cut down with more and more apps refusing to work outside play store downloads or refusing to work on 3rd party OS.
Serinus@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 341d
I think Google wants someone to go after if malware gets pushed onto the Play Store.
Auli@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 341d
How does this do that. To get in the play store you already have to be registered. This is for apps not on the play store.
berty@feddit.org · 6 pts · 341d
Its not about security for google, its about to have more control over their platform. They saw apple got away with their policies about sideloading here in Europe (which is still a pain in the ass) so they thought why not have it in android.
hatorade@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 341d
How does this help with malware?
Mwa@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 340d
this wont help with malware, in the past there was malware on the google play store.