The account is an example of how artificial intelligence is being used to push political agendas in wartime
MAGA has been swooning over photos of a blonde U.S. Army soldier, walking defiantly alongside President Donald Trump to carry out the America First agenda. But there’s just one problem — she’s AI.
Images most likely generated by artificial intelligence depicted Jessica Foster wearing heels on a U.S. warship in the Strait of Hormuz, posing for selfies with Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and giving a speech at the president’s “Board of Peace” event earlier this year.
The account, which has since been taken down, gained more than one million followers since its mysterious creator started posting on it four months ago, The Washington Post reports.
117 Comments
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 215 pts · 174d
What is a woman?
Is this a woman?
Dojan@pawb.social · 119 pts · 174d
This might have too many rights to be a woman.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 38 pts · 174d
They definitely give this way more power than they would any woman.
sbbq@lemmy.zip · 27 pts · 174d
A miserable little pile of secrets?
Theprogressivist@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 174d
Shatters wine glass
bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 23 pts · 174d
Name a woman
Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 174d
NAME A WOMAN
tanisnikana@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 174d
Aaah! Ah fuck, oh god! Aaaaaaah!
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 174d
Checks out. I went to high school with her.
She was voted most likely to have paperwork problems.
sbbq@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 174d
Name EVERY woman
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 174d
That's the original draft of the Whitney Houston hit btw:
🎵 Name every woman, it's all on youuu!🎵
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 174d
A woman is clearly the opposite of man so thusly I propose that a woman is a feathered quadruped.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 174d
Why must she have four? Why can she not have six, eight, or a hundred?
MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 174d
Because that's too many. It's icky. As the old saying goes, "Two legs, I'm down. Four legs, I'll come around. Five or more, I'm leaving town."
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 174d
dude you just gotta learn how to love a long lots of legged lady. a biblically accurate runner.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 174d
Because the opposite is pretty arbitrary when numbers are involved and the concept of a sexually dimorphic monopegs or slug people makes me uncomfortable. Also five or six legs would put them into a different clade of animal.
DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 173d
The opposite of 2 is definitely either -2 or ½.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 174d
weremillipedeladies have a lot of love to give i'm sure.
Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 173d
Imagine how much faster she could run into battle with a hundred more legs.
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 174d
The woman is IN the computer?!
fartographer@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 174d
Hansel is so hot right now
Taleya@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 173d
Two words for ya buddy: Zip Disk
Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 11 pts · 173d
funksoulkitchen@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 174d
No that's an Xbox
cecilkorik@piefed.ca · 3 pts · 174d
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
mouse@piefed.world · 8 pts · 174d
We're going to need to see what's in it's panties!
desmosthenes@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 174d
in spanish it is ^*
calcopiritus@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 174d
Only 1 possible word though. The rest would be a man.
Gork@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 174d
Those are some fine angles, mmhmmm
theherk@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 174d
Super clever comparison. I love it.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 114 pts · 174d
if you're stupid enough to believe this... you're stupid enough to be a Republican.
altphoto@lemmy.today · 69 pts · 174d
Where are my pantyhose! I'm going to war!
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 18 pts · 174d
Are you ready to go yet?
Hang on, I'm almost finished putting my 16 fingers on!
IratePirate@feddit.org · 2 pts · 173d
I wonder if AI girls get charged extra for their manicure... and if the DoD covers the expenses for her war claws. Somebody post a FOIA request!
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 174d
Ohh sexy war.
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 174d
You can't get out of the muddy trenches without woman cleats. I mean heels.
MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works · 46 pts · 174d
"We need more heels on the ground!"
FatVegan@leminal.space · 44 pts · 174d
Believing is one thing, but in what world do you join the army or support terrorism because there is some hot chick there?
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 174d
You gotta remember how dumb some folks are
ThunderQueen@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 173d
Kaput@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 173d
That would be the median.
DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 173d
Median is an average!
starik@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 173d
Is mode an average?
ThunderQueen@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 173d
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 171d
Then remember they are even dumber than that.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 174d
For a lot of folks, sadly, this one.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 174d
Every us navy boat has a hot chick room what do you mean
suckdings@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 173d
Well, not necessarily true any longer. The peak of the hot chicks room was in the late 70s and 80s. And those chicks are still in there, partying 24x7, serving their nation. Let's be honest, some of them... aren't really that hot any more. But there they are, and I thank them for their service all the same.
Edit: 24days? Ducking autocorrect. Unrelated, I miss UCB.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 173d
Magomra is still out there somewhere
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 173d
Ah yes, high-heeled shoes on a wet deck while leaning on the railing of a giant, moving ship. What could go wrong?
ThunderQueen@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 173d
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 174d
So maybe it's because my brain is currently fried from overheating and just getting done with work, but is it just me are the proportions off? Like the head is too big for the body, probably miss matched training data.
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 174d
For me it's the skirt and pole that make no sense
EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 174d
It looks like a bad photoshop, the lighting doesn't match and she is at a different resolution than the background
uienia@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 173d
Her arms are tiny, almost T. Rex proportioned as well.
astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz · 113 pts · 174d
Any MAGA who fell for this is beyond stupid (plus utterly unfamiliar with the military). Her uniform is wrong (skirt WAYYY too high). No one wears dress uniforms underway at sea in general, ESPECIALLY an enlisted soldier (who would likely be nowhere near a ship, even more especially in dress uniform). The ribbons on her dress uniform not only change from picture to picture, but are also the wrong size (sometimes) and not even actual US ribbons. I've never seen a regulation name tag say "US ARMY" and not a name. The undershirt in her camis isn't regulation. And this was just a quick look at the photos and only tangentially around the Army at work.
Oh and that's before the visible glitches because it's AI. This is laughably low effort.
EDIT: Damn, they didn't even use a real ship as the background. It's supposed to be a destroyer, and there are no US destroyers with an aft-facing bridge or part of the superstructure forward of the bridge windows. Just truly WTF
EDIT 2.0: I just saw a couple other photos because I got curious. One has her as a one-star general 😂, and a couple others have her wearing a (shitty looking) Combat Infantry Badge, which is only awarded for being in combat. So, I guess women CAN hack it in combat! Hegseth must be in shambles.
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world · 75 pts · 174d
She's hot and it's pro-Trump. Why should they care if it's real or not if it tickles their...confirmation bias?
starik@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 173d
Yes, people are really overthinking this. These are enthusiastic Trump voters. It’s not like they voted for Trump, but are otherwise intelligent, rational people in all other respects. The same disordered thinking that led to their voting choices impacts every aspect of their lives.
fizzle@quokk.au · 11 pts · 174d
Even without the technical knowledge of military uniforms, one look at any of these and my mind is just screaming "probably fake".
IDK why exactly.
I think it's mostly that she's so young and beautiful and doesn't have that vapid dead-behind-the-eyes look that most MAGA women do. She looks like a happy vivacious young woman, not like a highly decorated military officer.
IDK how to say this but if women like her actually existed we would already be overrun with real photos of them in the oval office.
The other red flags that don't require technical knowledge that trip the "probably fake" alert buzzer:
Who takes a selfie with POTUS in the oval office?
Why is she wearing a crop top that looks like it's from cost-co?
Why is she standing around on a ship in high heels looking serious?
Why is she walking around on a military base with Trump without the usual entourage?
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 174d
How about high heels on a carrier...
Hadriscus@jlai.lu · 7 pts · 174d
Thanks for all the checks
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 173d
https://m.xkcd.com/2501/
The only thing that stood out to me was the high heels and skirt instead of proper trousers.
lemjukes@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 173d
The literal first photo in the article has the American flag patch on her arm backwards. Not flipped like a mirrored image, like the “physical object” is constructed backwards….
astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 173d
Of all the things in the photos that actually made sense. It's weird, though, and threw me for a loop when I first saw uniforms and such and had to ask back then.
On uniforms, vehicles, etc. the flag is sometimes "backwards" so that the union (the blue and stars) are "forward facing." The idea is that the flag is flown from the left side in normal orientation, so the union is closest to the pole. If the person or vehicle were carrying a real flag, based on what side a person is observing, the flag may be "mirrored." In other words, the flag is moving with the person or vehicle and not the opposite way. You'll see that orientation a lot on American military and para-military uniforms.
I never understood why we don't just put a normal oriented flag on the opposite shoulder for the same effect, but hey...America is weird.
lemjukes@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 173d
I admit my ignorance and appreciate the correction. But now I’m just also annoyed at how stupid that sounds.
plyth@feddit.org · -2 pts · 174d
What if hardly anybody did but Democrats are ready to believe that Republicans are this stupid. Divide and Conquer.
Taleya@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 173d
You can literally see them losing their shit on its IG dude.
plyth@feddit.org · 0 pts · 173d
How many post there?
Taleya@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 173d
If only there were some way you could find out....
plyth@feddit.org · 0 pts · 173d
If only I would need to click to know that it's not millions and only is a self-selected group of thirsty frustrated people.
athatet@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 173d
They are already that stupid for being maga in the first place.
plyth@feddit.org · 0 pts · 173d
Wanting to make America great again is good. The problem is that they don't understand that it is a lie. I think it's stupid to hate them and let the elite harvest their hopes instead of talking to them and winning them over for a better society.
FrChazzz@lemmus.org · 53 pts · 174d
How many of the accounts that followed this one were actually bot/“AI” accounts designed to do nothing but help boost shit like this to a place where the press reports on it?
TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 174d
Yeah no way I'm believing 1 million real people followed this account. Would be hard to believe even if it said 10,000
8oow3291d@feddit.dk · 0 pts · 174d
Why not? 77 million people voted for Trump. And before you cry "election fraud", the pre election polls measured similar numbers.
Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 173d
What if it were somehow possible to fabricate polls or manipulate data?
Then we'd be in real trouble.
8oow3291d@feddit.dk · 0 pts · 173d
All the pollsters were pretty close to each other. If you posit fabricated polls, then you are saying that every single pollster in the US is completely compromised. That is just tinfoil hat, in the uncool way.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 41 pts · 174d
The pic of her in a vehicle with her bare feet sticking out the window appeared to show her with three boobs under her shirt, her right side boob having it's own seeming cleavage.
Janx@piefed.social · 18 pts · 174d
Without seeking it out, I've seen 2 versions of the referenced image: that one, and one with 2 boobs. Hopefully they were fooled by the lesser alien-looking one...
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 174d
Mutant. They prefer to be called mutants.
Janx@piefed.social · 5 pts · 174d
Huh. I just assumed the lady from Total Recall was an alien...
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 174d
Nah, man. Mutation from the radiation. That's pivotal to the story, too, graphically showing the class separation that sets up the conflict.
Janx@piefed.social · 2 pts · 174d
Sorry, haven't seen it...
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 174d
Oh good because I was just looking for it because somebody asked and I could only find a normal looking boob image and was questioning my memory.
jballs@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 174d
Lol got a link?
mx_smith@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 174d
There were 2 versions, one doctored to make it super AI looking with three boobs and 6 toes.
IratePirate@feddit.org · 37 pts · 173d
Does it really matter? These people were detached from reality long before AI was a thing. These are the people who swallowed horse dewormer to fight off a virus, stormed the capitol to hang their own party's VP over election fraud that never happened (but that they are now actively preparing themselves), and attacked a pizzeria to save children from the clutches of pedophiles (all the while ignoring their idol's ties to, and probably involvement with the crimes of, pedophile child trafficker Epstein).
We must come to grips with the fact that a significant part of the U.S. population is living in an alternative, media-generated universe. Baudrillard would be laughing his arse off if he could see it. The question is: how to deal with that.
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 173d
There almost definitely was voter fraud in 2020, but a different party was doing it than MAGA thinks. They got better at it in 2024.
Machinist@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 173d
It seems you've thought deeply about this. I've done so as well.
It really fucking freaks me out that such a large chunk of our society is detached from objective, verifiable realty. A fair amount of what they believe is pants-on-head crazy vengeance fantasy. Another big chunk has spooky parallels to literal Nazi propaganda such as the Protocol of the Elders of Zion, it's so similar that it's obviously just borrowed. It's shocking that more people don't see it for what it transparently is.
I have no clue what can be done about it. I don't know how society heals this or reinforces the value of facts, sanity, and critical thinking.
You got anything? Any thoughts about where we go from here? How to unfuck their heads? Where does this end if they aren't deprogrammed? How long will we be trapped in this?
Genuine questions because I ain't got a fucking clue at this point.
MathiasTCK@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 173d
I think it is a fight on all fronts situation.
If I am picking a single issue I am picking transparency. Without it you don't have a democracy.
I push for more ranked voting, there are a few types that all seem fine.
Illinois just had a plurality wins primary, that's crazy to me.
I found a thing I was looking for, referred from activistchecklist.org
"You’re three people who’ve held #meetings, made decisions, navigated disagreement, migrated platforms, and built a #SetOfAgreements you wrote yourselves. That’s not common."
https://readnarrowpath.com/
Machinist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 172d
Those are good security guides.
I think I'm at the point where it's more about keeping my head down. Protect my family and people. Hope we don't end up in a camp.
Until one of these occurs, nothing changes: some real national leadership opposing this, more than 5% start going hungry, or large numbers of people are being murdered/placed in camps.
MathiasTCK@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 172d
We all have vulnerable friends and family, it is a great time to stay in touch, build and rebuild relationships.
Janx@piefed.social · 34 pts · 174d
These MAGA freaks are just perfectly positioned to be scammed with AI, aren't they? Blind patriotism/nationalism, easy to manufacture images of the stereotypical people they hate, rejection of science and facts, unshakable loyalty to the Pedophile-In-Chief, zero critical thinking skills, intense tribalism, single echo-chamber source of "news", love for a pretty, white face, low intelligence, etc. I know some of them have already fallen for scams, but I bet it's nothing like what we'll see in the future, most likely by other Republicans...
dizzle18@lemmy.zip · 26 pts · 174d
Sometimes I really wish I had the time and energy to get in on this grift. These dumbfucks are the easiest people on the planet to rob. I just need a truckload full of shitty, Chinese made MAGA merch and a stand at some county fair, and I’d be fucking rich. Unfortunately, I have no desire whatsoever to be associated in any way with these fascist shit stains. The money is just not worth having that stench rub off on me.
otacon239@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 174d
There have to have been a lot of people in MAGA that thought this way at one point that got a bit too close to the event horizon and got sucked in. If you play a character full time, you eventually realize you’re no longer acting.
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 174d
LOL, "America First agenda".
Just what the holy fuck does that even mean according these dumbasses? Because Donvict and his pals are all about America LAST and themselves first.
Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml · 17 pts · 173d
She's the perfect MAGA woman: She can't think for herself and only do what you tell her to. But nice of them to normalize playing with dolls for men.
zakobjoa@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 174d
"We can always tell" motherfuckers
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 174d
“wHaT iS a WoMaN?” Not goddamn pixels, that’s for sure.
Taleya@aussie.zone · 10 pts · 174d
They didn't even register the triple boob, a news article will not inform them.
ripcord@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 174d
vegeta@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 174d
Bieren@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 173d
“No she isn’t. She’s more of a man than you are”. -MAGAcucks
dirthawker0@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 173d
I thought Kegsbreath declared women had no business being in the military? It's only for manly manly warrior men like himself?
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 174d
Yeah but it’s strictly a grift. Which makes me say good for them. We should all be so industriously fleecing these pithed fascist supporters.
tristynalxander@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 174d
Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 174d
That shit loaf in trumps pants isnt ai
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 174d
AI sex on offer by someone representing a pedo. Makes sense.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 174d
Honestly pretty surprised...
Lots of authoritarians like being surrounded by attractive women in uniforms, so it's believable trump did it.
I remember in Bogoto some high ranking dude had 3 legitimate super model looking women a company him when he came on board. They were all easily 5'8, but we're in legit 6 in heals or more on top of that. Super weird running into them unexpected.
We're running dangerously low on military psyop egirls ironically enough, so maybe that's why they're going to AI?
Lujan clearly isn't able to handle this on her own.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQUa1rXMipo
matlag@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 173d
Look, how many young attractive women would agree to follow and prop Trump everywhere without feeling (legitimately) in danger?
Only an AI would!
Bloefz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 173d
Do military women really wear that kind of uniform with fragile pantyhose? And high heels aboard a warship? That alone would make me call BS.
kinther@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 173d
It's sad that we live in a world where this occurs.
I lay the blame squarely at the feet of corporate social media.
Kaput@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 173d
Trump next step https://youtube.com/shorts/KYEatfhkckM?
devolution@lemmy.world · -21 pts · 174d
Why is it the right that has embraced this technology while the left looks like fucking luddites and is losing ground?
WesternInfidels@feddit.online · 27 pts · 174d
"This technology" is, as used here, industrial scale lying which was made possible through industrial scale theft.
We can re-phrase the question: "Why is the right jumping headlong into industrial scale lies and crime, while the left loses ground on this front?"
An answer suggests itself to me.
devolution@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 174d
We can be on a moral high ground all we want but it does not change the fact that they are winning.
I hate it.
WesternInfidels@feddit.online · 9 pts · 174d
I don't think it's strictly about "moral high ground." If you're willing to do anything to win, then if you do win, the winner will be a person who is willing to do anything.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip · 23 pts · 174d
Because the right is easier to grift.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 174d
Because it’s tailor made for grifters, it’s a lying machine, just like everything else made for and by conservatives.
otacon239@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 174d
The goal of technology is to make our lives better, not make everyone else’s worse. Or so I’ve been led to believe.
devolution@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 174d
Cyberpunk had always said otherwise. I just wanted to believe that wasn't true.
Surprise surprise for me. 😞
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 173d
Fascists are not constrained by having to respect reality.