Both Microsoft and Sony say they're under no obligation to pass tariff refunds on to customers
https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/both-microsoft-and-sony-say-theyre-under-no-obligation-to-pass-tariff-refunds-on-to-customers/
497 points · 86 comments · view on lemmy.world
86 Comments
RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world · 170 pts · 3d
And they’re not.
And you’re not obligated to buy their products
Gullible@sh.itjust.works · 29 pts · 3d
Is piracy a thing on modern consoles?
iamthetot@piefed.ca · 42 pts · 3d
Depends on your firmware and such. It often takes time, but they'll all be jailbroken eventually.
Auli@lemmy.ca · -1 pts · 2d
Not even true
village604@adultswim.fan · 1 pts · 2d
village604@adultswim.fan · 1 pts · 2d
What previous gen console hasn't been?
BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 3d
Use emulation. Can't play the latest, but there's no shortage
Gullible@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 3d
I figured. DS had great piracy, which is where my burgeoning hope was pulled from.
steelplatedmech@piefed.ca · 5 pts · 3d
Switch has great support too. Older models could be modded without requiring hardware modification the later ones like the oled did.
gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 2d
99% of the games worth playing on them come out on PC, so yes.
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 3d
Look into the bounty on a PS5 firmware crack.
Gullible@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d
15k seems like a nice sum. I'm guessing it's pretty locked down if a few months' pay hasn't led to anything
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 3d
Or it could be an attempt to drive the sum up since Sony pay for bugs found. That said, these things take time to find too.
myyass@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 3d
And I don't. Those 800 games that I haven't touched aren't going to play themselves.
floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -3 pts · 3d
Neither one sussists on consumer products lol
reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net · 102 pts · 3d
Just to highlight the good actors too:
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3d
That thing is so hilariously overpriced in the first place, that a few bucks don't make any difference neither to the seller, nor the consumer.
popcar2@piefed.ca · 4 pts · 3d
Nice of them regardless, but I totally agree. The playdate is a neat toy but it's wild how successful they are considering it costs $230 and most games on it are paid. You could buy a similarly neat retro handheld for only $50!
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
It's a trait of a certain market of quirky and unique high-quality devices. E.g. the Dirtywave M8 music tracker was sold at 650$. But they also provide the software freely, and one can diy it on a Raspberry Pi.
Teenage Engineering, who designed Playdate, have most of their products rather ridiculously priced. E.g. the portable synth/sampler OP-1 costs 2000€.
TBF I have a Chinese handheld for emulators, and discovered online that the screws on it are positioned such that the heads can pierce the battery when it swells. This was after the battery completely died in a year of disuse, so I was looking up replacements.
DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 3d
Guess I'll continue pirating their shit.
kibblebits@quokk.au · 34 pts · 3d
Ha ha ha ha. It was a fucking griffffttttt!!!!
Jesusaurus@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 3d
Trump knows no other way. He milked a casino dry ffs.
adarza@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 3d
at least four of them
im_fine_sandy@nord.pub · 29 pts · 3d
I really hate that companies being hostile to their customers has become normalised such that it's really expected.
There's very clearly a right and scrupulous thing to do. Not having an obligation to do that is not an excuse not to.
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 9 pts · 3d
The reality is that it was all just a way to give a stimulus to companies without saying directly
im_fine_sandy@nord.pub · 2 pts · 3d
That's obvious, and it's not what I'm talking about.
creamfresh@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 3d
Companies always has been hostile when they are so big that they are only fathomable as market entity. Privatise gains, socialise losses.
im_fine_sandy@nord.pub · 2 pts · 3d
I disagree.
Yes companies have privatised profits and socialised losses since forever, thats not what I'm talking about.
Its not that long ago that you could talk to an actual person in customer service who at least had a supervisor with the authority to do provide an appropriate resolution.
Now the standard mode of operation is to simply close ranks, and make a PR statement like this... "we're not going to do that simply because you can't make us".
HumbleExaggeration@feddit.org · 20 pts · 3d
Please don't forget who enacted these unlawful tariffs in the first place and who, to this day, uses them to blackmail other countries.
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 3d
Also, don't forget that US corporations have gone along with this and are refusing to give the money back to the people who they took it from. The entire system is complicit and there are no good guys anymore.
incompetent@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1d
That's not entirely true. Some companies are offering refunds to customers that paid tariffs.
One examole:
db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 3d
No one could have possibly anticipated this
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
*no one
db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2d
Fix ed, thx
supersquirrel@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 2d
*fix ed
db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2d
.
RadiallyAxiomatic@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 3d
If the government wanted the people to have it they could have stipulated that or, better yet, given it directly to the people. You need a complicit government for 'privatized profit; socialized loses'
1984@lemmy.today · 19 pts · 3d
People are butthurt about this but don't have the willpower to not buy or use their products.
Tja@programming.dev · 10 pts · 3d
Or to vote for someone who has more than one word in their vocabulary: tariffs
TrippingBalls@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d
Beautiful
Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 3d
Sucks but it's true. I've been trying to de-microsoft my household for over a year now. My partner won't switch away from Windows, despite how fucking bad 11 is, and we're still paying for office 365, even though I haven't used MS office on a non-company computer for about 15 years at this point.
I haven't had anything sony in decades. Everything I got from them was overpriced trash that broke under very meager circumstances.
Next on my chopping block is Google. Once the my phone is paid off, I'm switching to Graphene. Currently trying out open street maps, and trying to spin up my own email server so I can ditch my Gmail account.
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 3d
Not surprising considering most companies have no plans to refund the consumer for the tariff costs they passed on because there's no regulation forcing them to do so.
Willy@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 3d
did most companies pass it on though? some didnt and in those cases why should they?
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
Sigh...
https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2025/06/are-businesses-absorbing-the-tariffs-or-passing-them-on-to-their-customers/
And did you have a point on the cases of companies that didn't? The answer to that is blatantly obvious and not that deep.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 3d
why?
because fuck you. that's why.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2d
This entire scheme was a combination of market manipulation along with a universal price hike. A lot of very rich people got a lot richer. They got to engage in insider trading while massively increasing prices while pretending they had no choice.
SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 3d
And we have no obligation to buy their products. Bodycott is the only language companies understand
olafurp@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2d
And that's a surprise to.... absolutely no one
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 2d
I mean, unless they were expecting a "tarriff check." I knew it wouldn't show because grifters and liars are seldom honest.
xSikes@feddit.online · 11 pts · 3d
If some people haven’t woken up to reality yet and this other nail in the coffin doesn’t do it, I don’t know what will.
starblursd@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 3d
Obligated? No
They're doing it for the love of the game
bibbasa@piefed.social · 10 pts · 3d
yeah fuck you too
racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 3d
Yes, that's correct, they are under no obligation. Obviously. It would be nice if they did that, but there is obviously no obligation.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2d
TBF, I'm not getting one from Linux, either.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 2d
You're not? I got the same amount I spent back.
fodor@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 2d
Mine was a 200% return! Interest was included!
ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 2d
Same here!
minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 3d
Because they don't have to. This is business. This is psychopathy. They will only give when they are compelled to do so.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2d
We over charged you and you can suck it.
heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2d
Eloquently put.
Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 3d
The same obligation we are under to buy them or not.
IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d
They make it so much easier for us nerds to tell the normies that these companies suck and to not buy shit from them. Broken ad infested OS, no disk Sony drama, and now this.
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 3d
Sony already don't want me to buy their games, so at least they've ensured they don't owe me a refund.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2d
You literally can’t buy a game from them. They argued as much in court yesterday.
DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 2d
I really hope courts kick their ass for bullshit like that
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2d
“$$$$what was$$$$$$$that I$$$$$can’t$$$$hear$$$you$$$$$$”
-The “Justice” System
dance_ninja@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d
Maybe not, but they should anyways.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 3d
microsoft is trying to pass the AI cost to customers, via windows 11.
Midnitte@beehaw.org · 4 pts · 3d
I believe UPS and FedEx are required to make refunds as people were explicitly charged tariff related fees.
Because Sony and Microsoft just baked the price in, its a little hard to get them to refund since theres technically nothing to refund (as shady and fucked up and goodwill burning as it is).
Auli@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
They know who purchased a new console in that time frame they could give them at least gift cards or something. Or like the one company reducing cost till the money is gone. It might not be the same people but your customers at least git it.
Midnitte@beehaw.org · 1 pts · 2d
Well, hence the goodwill burning part.
They obviously dont value us as customers, so I say dont give them business
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space · 4 pts · 3d
🐧
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 2d
MS has other more concerning things they will pass on to.
bloviate@lemmus.org · 4 pts · 3d
Ok so profits are through the roof but there's no one to buy your products.
Snapz@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d
They must just need more time to do the right thing naturally without being legally obligated?
HK65@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 3d
Self regulation and the free* markets in action
klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 3 pts · 3d
We do (in the USA) have a legal framework for this already? There are at least a handful of industries where, if it is found that they've mischarged, they do have to provide a refund.
Also the thing that annoys me the most is: They didn't pay the tarrifs, the consumers did. Those price changes were 100% passed onto consumers, and it should be consumers of those products seeing the refunds. If they can prove that they lost revenue based on the price hikes, sure, give some recompense, but they shouldn't be getting refunds on something they effectively didn't spend money on
Yezzey@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1d
Haha stupid consumer.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
greedy fucks have no heart nor soul for anyone but themselves
nullspace@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
I can't really blame them. I wouldn't expect a check in the mail from Starbucks because of their coffee bean tariffs were refunded.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 2d
Starbucks doesn’t require you to have a verified identity, contact information, and credit card on file to buy beans. The companies in question could do this with the click of a button.
nullspace@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
Okay then I don't expect my local deli to give me a 50 cent refund on a turkey sandwich. Don't be pedantic.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2d
I literally agreed with you about that. Read before you snark.
cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 3d
And yet game developers will keep fellating Microsoft, requiring Windows to play their PC games, giving those of us who left Windows the finger.
They're all basically in on the grift.
chunes@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d
steam+proton is a better software distribution method for games than anything else linux has got going on. Game devs hate having to build their games six different ways for different distros with 0.5% market share each.
aloofPenguin@piefed.world · 2 pts · 2d
I'm just wondering why they don't use flatpak or appimage. statically compiled binaries that work on every/ most Linux distributions, wouldn't that alleviate the problems of packaging and compatibility?
nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de · -2 pts · 3d
Unpopular opinion I guess, but sure. Why should they? They sold good for a price they deemed worthy, calculated their dues and risk, and customer bought it for this price.
Companies have to maximize their profit.
People should not be mad at those companies. Proper targets are: Those who created unlawful taxes, capitalism or the specific rules within capitalism or the (in this case) the USA.