The trick to lowering gas prices is driving less, US energy secretary says

https://www.businessinsider.com/gas-prices-labor-day-iran-war-driving-chris-wright-energy-2026-9

439 points · 133 comments · view on lemmy.world

133 Comments

deft@lemmy.wtf · 111 pts · 2d (6 replies)

Build trolleys and trains you fuckers

treadful@lemmy.zip · 55 pts · 2d (3 replies)

And bicycle infrastructure, please.

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 27 pts · 1d (2 replies)

Sorry didn't you hear, bikes are dei now.

huppakee@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Isn't using gas to drive somewhere dei too? Or happened that after 2026?

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 3 pts · 1d

I think that depends on the day of the week

W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 1d

Then you wind up with this problem

M137@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 8h

Trams*

Also, subways and more busses, just public transport overall (obviously).

Sibshops@feddit.cl · 91 pts · 2d (4 replies)

I bet the trick to lowering health care costs is to need health care less, too.

ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 2d (1 reply)

Aha! You've figured out their ingenuous strategy! /s

But seriously, what in the smooth-brained bullshit is this kind of logic?!

zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 1d

It's the same shit they did & still do with COVID-19 testing. 'If we do less tests, there will be less cases recorded! Problem solved!'

driftwood@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 1d

I save money on healthcare by spending 1/4 of my paycheck on health insurance and then absolutely never using it - hoping I cease existing if anything occurs.

agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1d

These people literally don't understand economics beyond the absolute basics of supply and demand.

iatenine@piefed.social · 77 pts · 2d (1 reply)

Sounds great! I look forward to your heavy federal investment into mass transit

atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 2d

(not like that)

GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 45 pts · 1d (2 replies)

MangoCats@feddit.it · 6 pts · 1d (1 reply)

And, let's all return to the office while we're driving less, right?

megane_kun@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 1d

Return to the office, don't return home. Don't go anywhere else. No driving. *points at forehead*

mycodesucks@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 1d (10 replies)

Hope all the miserable assholes who voted for stopping electrification feel it in every part of them. I hope they have to give up on real, meaningful life dreams forever because they are now unaffordable. And I hope their houses specifically burn down in the wildfires the CO2 from their gasoline made so common.

I am beyond done with this gasoline bullshit.

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 12 pts · 1d (3 replies)

Gas in my region is well over $5 a gallon I don't notice because we went from 2 cars to 1, and the one is an EV.

Meanwhile I STILL see these absolute morons buying huge gas suvs and trucks because.. They need to? Always have a bullshit excuse that's always easily debunked.

needanke@feddit.org · 8 pts · 1d

We are at $10.20/Galllon (2.30€/L) and I am so happy I do not need a car.

yakko@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Y'all buying gas by the hour?

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 3 pts · 1d

Ha, at this point I wouldn't be surprised. Fixed it!

HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 1d (5 replies)

You can just electrify on your own though, regardless of what the government wants.

mycodesucks@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1d (3 replies)

There are a lot of things people can do on their own... in a world where the median US income isn't $45,000 and responsible and capable products aren't tariffed to hell.

Mass adoption comes with affordability which comes with support and clear, intentional direction. Consumers don't shift paradigms when they think the new paradigm won't go anywhere. We can't even get people off of X - and that costs NOTHING.

Electrifying on your own is prohibitively expensive for most people, and the fact that those people have to be prepared to also pay an additional premium because they're fighting their own government at the same time, in a period in time where people can barely afford FOOD, is not tenable.

HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · -7 pts · 1d (2 replies)

Using energy costs more money than not using it. With the amount of people flying every day don't tell me cost is the problem.

forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 11 pts · 1d

With the amount of people flying every day don’t tell me cost is the problem.

Cost is part of the problem.

VAK@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1d

Dumbass, you think the median person is flying everyday??

AA5B@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d

There can be some high cost barriers to that in the US.

atro_city@fedia.io · 32 pts · 1d (3 replies)

Adds another lane: drive less!

Stops construction of another public transport project: Drive Less!!

Removes solar power and electric car subsidies: DRIVE Less!

Makes electric bikes illegal: DRIVE LESS!

(Party of freedom, btw)

AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1d

If it were a dem saying this maga would be crying tyranny like they did with masks during covid.

Omgpwnies@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Supports/encourages RTO policies: Drive less!

WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d

Forces for federal employees. More restrictive than pre COVID.

Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 pts · 2d

I do hope they keep it up with the hubris cos that always goes well

MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 28 pts · 1d (1 reply)

So, back to home office, yes?

atro_city@fedia.io · 7 pts · 1d

Goolag and Scamazon say no.

tal@lemmy.today · 26 pts · 2d

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Wright

In 2011, he founded Liberty Energy, then known as Liberty Oilfield Services.[15] As of February 2023, the company was valued at $2.8 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal.[16] As the CEO of Liberty Energy, Wright earned $5.6 million in 2023.[11]

Despite Herculean efforts on his part, Chris Wright was ultimately unable to live up to voter expectations of delivering lower fuel prices.

limelight79@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 1d

Well we would, if your stupid administration hadn't cut telework for feds.

Stupid stupid stupid.

balsoft@lemmy.ml · 21 pts · 1d

US government evolution of transportation ideology

  1. Walking is for the poors and the idiots
  2. Cycling is for suicidal maniacs
  3. Public transit is big government and communism and you'll get mugged
  4. Cars are driving up gas prices
  5. ???
  6. PROFIT! (for the oil companies and the rest of the ruling class)
Midnight1938@reddthat.com · 20 pts · 2d

“Let them eat cake”

CADmonkey@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 1d (3 replies)

Wait until he figures out that wfh is a great way to reduce driving

MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com · 13 pts · 1d (2 replies)

The fact that more employers haven't jumped at WFH is so telling. It's basically equivalent to an increase in salary, an improvement in employee work life balance, and a wider recruitment pool all wrapped into one without them actually having to do anything, except maybe spend LESS money on overhead.

It's something we could easily change to improve the lives of everyone and help the environment. I'm really disappointed we're not seeing more support for it.

BrickEater@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Its because a massive amount of our real estate economy is propped up by artificially inflated office space which would kneecap a ton of corporate and REIT profits if they were to go down to actually affordable costs.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 18h

I can't think of many groups more richly deserving financial ruin.

Alexfire@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 1d (1 reply)

If Dems said that before the '24 election, to eat less food and drive less to save money, everyone would go mad lol, but this magafool says it and they cool with it.

Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org · 1 pts · 1d

Vice-versa too in some communities.

mereo@piefed.ca · 16 pts · 1d

Great suggestion! The US has great public transit /s… wait… no…

daychilde@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1d (17 replies)

I drive to and from dialysis three times per week, and to the occasional medical appointment. Which of those exactly should I be skipping?

MangoCats@feddit.it · 4 pts · 1d (1 reply)

How long without dialysis before you don't use any gasoline at all?

Remember the anti-COVID vaccination push?

daychilde@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d

Thank you for the giggle, lol. I'm actually not sure, but there was a lady who became convinced doctors were lying to her and I believe it took a couple of months before she died. So… a couple of months?

moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com · -1 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Take the bus. Or move within walking distance to a dialysis center.

daychilde@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d

Oh, you're just full of practical tips.

Michal@programming.dev · -8 pts · 1d (12 replies)

You could skip all of them if you take a bus /train/bike. This is of course if you have the option. I don't know your situation.

PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 1d (7 replies)

dialysis three times per week

/bike

daychilde@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d

Wheelchair user, too, come to that. lol

needanke@feddit.org · -9 pts · 1d (5 replies)

E-Bike? E-Scooter? That's easier than walking depending on how far away you park.

daychilde@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1d (2 replies)

Well, neverminding the 12.2 mile distance, my only option besides a freeway would be a road that is four lane with no sidewalks (it's technically suburban but for most of the way there's only the occasional house or business, so I would be in the right lane all the way) with a speed limit of 45 and no street lights.

As a wheelchair user, I'd have to use a four-wheel device. I don't know the range on those because I don't own one.

AA5B@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d (1 reply)

How much could they cost? $10?

/s

daychilde@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d

The Amtrak ticket would only be $11, although I'd have to leave at 11:50pm the night before AND the bus doesn't carry wheelchairs anyway. heh. Paratransit doesn't run early enough, either.

kent_eh@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 1d

E-Bike? E-Scooter?

Not when there is a 6 lane freeway between you and your destination.

MangoCats@feddit.it · 3 pts · 1d

Not everywhere yet, but there are growing regulations and outright bans of e-bikes across US municipalities.

kent_eh@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 1d (2 replies)

of course if you have the option.

And there is the root of the problem.

Those options are increasingly not available in American cities

PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Nor are they available to disabled people. But people like @Michal@programming.dev think they have the whole world figured out because they have the privilege to do so.

daychilde@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d

In some ways, it was worse - when I lived in the same city as the dialysis place, before I was driving again, I took paratransit. Although it's a "shared ride" and sometimes I'd actually have a fellow passenger, most of the time it was just me in the van. heh.

(Although I know for a fact that during "rush hour" they would sometimes have entire groups going close enough to need a van)

daychilde@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d

Oof. It would be hilarious to try and take the bus to the Amtrak station in the city in which I live, go up one station to the city in which the dialysis center is located, take the bus to dialysis, have my dialysis, then go back. I'm not sure I could do that in a single day. Certainly not my chair time of 6:00am. But let's see:

Well, alright. Actually, Amtrak ticket would be $11, which is not bad. And while the ride would be 4:21am-4:20am, I wouldn't be able to get a bus until 6:00, getting to dialysis 25 minutes late.

The first obstacle is that I would have to leave my apartment for the Amtrak station at 11:30pm the previous day, as service doesn't run in the middle of the night.

antianarchist@sopuli.xyz · 15 pts · 1d (2 replies)

BREAKING NEWS: World hunger finally stopped, thanks to US officials suggesting to just “eat more food, if you are hungry”.

AA5B@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d

Just look at how much less food and other aid the US is giving out. Clearly the problem is solved

MangoCats@feddit.it · 2 pts · 1d

Poverty solved! Just don't be poor.

Arola@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 2d (1 reply)

Rickyism 101: "supply and command... you need supply, I command you not to"

numbermess@fedia.io · 2 pts · 2d

Ricky is smarter and compassionate than anybody we have now.

Ricky 2028

Triumph@fedia.io · 13 pts · 2d (1 reply)

We'll all drive less when gas is $15/gal

moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com · 0 pts · 1d

That should have been the price in the 1980s ffs

Ravenheart@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 17h

Right wing "solutions" to difficulties are always insincere, unreasonable nonsense like this.

Can't pay your bills? Eat less! Can't afford medical care? Shouldn't have been unhealthy! Gas prices killing you? Drive less! Depressed and burned out? Just be happy and work harder! You think billionaires are greedy? Well what charities are you giving to!? Tired of capitalist exploitation? Stop buying stuff and go live in the woods! You love immigrants? Well then let them all live in your home!

Victim blaming dressed up as rugged individualism. Meanwhile those actually responsible for the hardships get off scot-free.

Beth@piefed.social · 13 pts · 1d

Guess I’ll stop going to work….hmm…maybe I can get some of those WFH days back now that I’m limited to 1 per week?

GloriousGasHole@piefed.social · 13 pts · 1d (7 replies)

I don't understand why the generation that snacked on lead paint chips is allowed to be in charge of this country.

tal@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 1d (3 replies)

My understanding is that paint is only very rarely stripped out of existing houses. It's normally just painted over.

In the US, lead paint prohibitions went into place in 1978.

So unless you've avoided being in buildings constructed prior to 1978, you have probably been in buildings with lead paint.

That's not to say that there aren't benefits to painting over lead paint. I'm sure that it reduces the amount of leaded paint dust and such. But a chip can still contain paint from an earlier coat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead-based_paint_in_the_United_States

In 1971, Congress banned the use of lead-based paint in residential projects (including residential structures and environments) constructed by, or with the assistance of, the federal government.[3] The Consumer Product Safety Commission followed with implementing regulations, effective in 1978.[4] Additional regulations regarding lead abatement, testing and related issues have been issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

AA5B@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1d (1 reply)

When my kids were little and we were moving into our new to us house, built in 1946, they also cautioned about the outside. Treat 10’ around the house as potentially contaminated from peeling exterior paint. No vegetable gardens in that dirt. No kids playing in that dirt

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 18h

The risk of lead absorption via skin contact isn't worth even thinking about. So unless the kids were eating substantial volumes of dirt, that's absurdly over-cautious. If you keep them indoors and feed them a tuna sandwich, the mercury dose will exceed the damage done by exposure to lead in household soil, unless something well out of the ordinary is happening.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 18h

It’s normally just painted over.

And as long as it's encapsulated like that, it's harmless.

I’m sure that it reduces the amount of leaded paint dust and such.

Almost completely, yes.

But a chip can still contain paint from an earlier coat.

And as long as you don't eat it and you dispose of it immediately, it's not going to hurt you.

It's good that we terminated the production of lead paint, but unless you're in substandard, ill-maintained housing, you face far greater toxic risks from other household chemicals, gas stoves, old asbestos insulation, etc.

guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1d (2 replies)

I don’t understand why the generation that snacked on lead paint chips is allowed to be in charge of this country.

It's what the American voters wanted.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 18h

The bigger lead exposure back in the day was from breathing in particulate emissions from the burning of leaded gasoline. People's lead levels correlated pretty closely with proximity and volume of nearby vehicular traffic.

Eating paint chips was never a big contributor, unless the person was living in some crumbling, damp tenement that was seldom cleaned. It just got popularized by some bullshit Freakonomics pseudo-analysis.

Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1d

The voters also "snacked on lead paint chips" [sic]

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1d

The trick to having less fascists in control is to eliminate fascists.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 1d (2 replies)

They are also encouraging auto makers to lower gas mileage. Keep bragging how awesome oil company stocks, and dependant US allies, are thanks to Iran war.

rumba@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 1d (1 reply)

knock out those SUV exceptions and all of a sudden all cars have to get 40mpg....

PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1d

The main problem was that every car became an SUV so they could avoid the regulations. I just hope now that small cars don’t have to worry about them that more of them get on the market again.

nullspace@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1d (5 replies)

No new wars would have been nice.

forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 1d (4 replies)

"Build the wall! Lock her up! Drain the swamp!"

lol

lmao even

green_goglin@thelemmy.club · 4 pts · 1d (3 replies)

bro they’re still waiting for Hillary to get “locked up”

forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 1d (2 replies)

ANY DAY NOW

green_goglin@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 1d (1 reply)

iTs HaBbEnInG!

forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 1d

TO THE TOP! NO BRAKES ON THIS TRAIN!

NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1d

Kennystillalive@feddit.org · 9 pts · 1d (1 reply)

I mean, than they should provide good, affordable public transportation.

Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 1d

Sounds like socialism.

violetmirage26@thelemmy.club · 8 pts · 1d

Great, so who is going to force the RTO M-F bosses to at least let us be hybrid?

Sordid_Seraphim@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 1d (1 reply)

"Poison air? Have you tried breathing less?"

kreskin@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d

Your kids got raped by Epsteins clients? Have more kids and your average kid/rape ratio will go down for every new kid your produce. Probably.

unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth · 8 pts · 2d

The broken clock strikes again.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1d

Best way to lower energy prices is to vote out the republicans.

ratrace@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 2d (1 reply)

welp looks like I am doing the right thing

WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 2d

When doing the "right thing" happens to overlap with the "Right" thing, it just ruins the feel-good for me.

tigermountain@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1d

Driving less? The hell with that. I'm not going to drive at all. I'll be saving all the gas money!

oppy1984@lemdro.id · 7 pts · 1d

Ok then the administration should push all employers to make any position that is able a work from home decision. But we all know that won't happen, got to protect those commercial real estate profits!

kreskin@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1d (2 replies)

Eating less will solve food prices a bit. Just not eating will solve it entirely. And sleeping outside under a bush or in a nice box solves your housing issues. With all your problems solved we'll be looking for you to work some longer hours.

Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org · 2 pts · 1d

So we should expect the health department to suggest Breatharianism soon?

Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 17h

Oh, look at Money Bags over here with their "nice box".

Now we see the violence inherent in the system!

Jiral@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Now if people only had a choice to live in evil "15min cities" where distances are much shorter and feasible alternatives to driving are available and affordable, they actually could do that, without quality of life collapsing. Oh wait, having a non miserable life is no criterion for this administration, then forget that socialist 15 min nonsense, just drive less.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 18h

I'm living in one, or at least the 15-minute part of one. Small city in southwest England. I drive about once a week, to go out to the countryside to hike and visit a pub. Everything else is done on foot or on a bicycle. Highly recommended, despite it being totally evil. My MAGA relatives fear that I'm living in some hellish dystopia and it's only a matter of weeks before I'll be shot if I try to leave the city limits. They're already spun up enough that I don't own a gun and that I get my medical treatment on the NHS (which is under stress nationally, but still works well where I live). "Death panels," y'know...

Now, if only the locals could figure out how to make decent Mexican food, I'd be perfectly content.

captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 15h (1 reply)

I assume he doesn't think this should be paired with ramping up public transit options and bike and pedestrian friendly infrastructure

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 15h

no, thats evil socialist communism, you unamerican traitor! /s

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 19h

And meanwhile, here in the UK, the average is $8.40 per US gallon at the current exchange rate.

Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1d

Says the same group that said they lowered COVID rates by not reporting them

green_link@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 8h

that won't work. if everyone were to stop driving or relying on gas tomorrow. the oil companies would still raise the price because they are now "losing money" due to low demand and have to raise prices to make up for the make-believe money they are "losing"

Danarchy@lemmy.nz · 5 pts · 2d

Jimmy Carter ass suggestion

green_goglin@thelemmy.club · 5 pts · 1d

Fuck you in particular, Ricky.

rumba@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 1d

yes, you seeee, you peasants need to stop taking your private jets on unnecessary jaunts.

Randelung@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 18h

Yeah you stupid pay pigs, don't you know economics!? Supply and demand! Just stop demanding the resource we spent decades making indispensable and kept artificially scarce!

betanumerus@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 1d

MAGA, the O&G companies and Elon Musk installed Trump because they wanted us to drive less? That was their plan all along? We all believe that ...

stoy@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 2d

Yeah, supply and demand, lower demand and prices decrease

adwijoma@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 8h

The trick to lowering gas prices is insert gif of guilottine coming down

fake_meows@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 9h

You can pry my demand destruction from my cold hands by crashing the economy and laying me off!

moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com · 3 pts · 1d

Yo, fucker. We don't want lower gas prices. Keep them high.

We can't afford the cost of low gas prices.

phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 19h (1 reply)

Sounds like they're having one of their periodic contests to see who can be the worst cunt in public.

OrteilGenou@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 18h

They'll never catch the frontrunner

fartographer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d

I think I twisted my ankle. Should probably cut off my foot.

Etterra@discuss.online · 3 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Yeah fuck this guy, let's air drop him into Iran.

blackshirt@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d

No thanks, you can keep him.

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1d

That guy is a genius! Not even an expert in the obvious would've went there. Can we make his "bonuses" even more grotesquely huge? /s

LordCrom@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 9h

I would drive less if there were any decent public options that ran frequently.

Ever try waiting for a bus in South Florida sun, 95 deg F anf 100% humidity for 45 min just to have the driver wave you off because the bus is already full.

guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 9h

The trick to saving money is just to not do anything ever.

Fucking big brain they've got there! /s

kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1d

Doom@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 8h

Oooo let's get all the cars off the road and ride bikes instead! He said it not me.

mEEGal@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 18h

as a strong believer in the fuckcars movement (and as a car fucker myself), I concur