According to some sources, at least 1 in 8 of the world population is classified as ‘obese’. Since nobody in any government seems to have thought up a working solution, what do you believe can be done to solve the epidemic?
According to some sources, at least 1 in 8 of the world population is classified as ‘obese’. Since nobody in any government seems to have thought up a working solution, what do you believe can be done to solve the epidemic?
230 Comments
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 82 pts · 4d
Cheap access to fresh fruit and veg
Education for healthy eating starting in childhood
Public outdoor spaces that are enjoyable to exercise in
Cheap, frequent public transit to allow everyone to access food and public spaces
If those don’t take care of most of it we can keep going from there.
faythofdragons@slrpnk.net · 35 pts · 4d
And not just fresh fruit and veg, but a variety of good quality fresh fruit and veg. Red delicious apples are cheap fresh fruit, zucchini is cheap fresh veg, but you won't enjoy eating your fruit and veg if all you're getting is nasty apples and zucchini.
bizarroland@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 4d
I feel like we could do a lot by simply removing the sales taxes from raw vegetables and non-exotic fruits.
That would be a government subsidy, but it would be a subsidy primed to go towards the consumer.
faythofdragons@slrpnk.net · 12 pts · 4d
Can't hurt. The state with the least obesity is Colorado, and they don't have a sales tax on groceries, but do with candy and stuff.
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip · 9 pts · 4d
Only 11 states charge sales tax on groceries as it is. And all but 3 of the ones that do, have a reduced rate.
nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 3d
But zucchini is delicious
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
Growing up I thought I didn't prefer apples. It turns out I just don't like the most common apple that was fed to me. "Red Delicious" is false advertising. Fuji, Jazz, Honeycrisp, Yellow Delicious, Pink Lady, are all far far superior. I'll even eat a Gala apple even thought those are just okay. Red Delicious apples are trash tier apples.
RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip · 2 pts · 3d
Bro what are you talking about zuchcineine and appel GOOD you are the avatar of the demiurge
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3d
I like red delicious apples. I like all varieties of apples. The hate comes from familiarity and snobbery. It's like coffee, cigars, and wine--marketing and price is the only real difference. One isn't worse than the other, we're just taught that. Every variety of apple can become mealy if left tool long, but people associate that with RD because that's the apple they had as kids and sometimes they were mealy, and kids are very sensitive to differences in their food.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d
I posted my comment before seeing yours and my experience is a close match to what you describe.
Hard disagree. Even as an adult a Red Delicious is a disappointment. I don't turn down free apples when offered. I always turn down Red Delicious.
faythofdragons@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 3d
Nah, the hate for Red Delicious comes from the fact that they've been bred to look good and have a long shelf life instead of having good flavor. They used to taste better, but due to the industrialization of farming, orchards were paid more for better looking apples. Eventually, the cultivar developed into the modern Red Delicious, which has a thick skin and starchy texture that resists bruising during machine handling.
rowinxavier@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d
A thing most people don't get is that knowledge of how to prepare food and the time to actually do it are also key. My parents could cook 3 meals between them and poorly at that. I didn't know anything about how to use a knife including the most basic things like sharp knives being less dangerous than blunt ones. I have learned later in life and I am fairly accomplished in the kitchen, including making a roux, making passata from scratch, fermenting and pickling vegetables, making yoghurt, making adaptable stir fry dishes, making stews and soups, and all manner of other things like breads and pâté. None of those things were taught to me by my parents or through schooling. All the access in the world wouldn't make me able to use chicken liver without making it chalky and nasty, or cook a steak without ruining it.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d
It’s a very good suggestion, but do you think any government right now would push for that? Not disagreeing with you, just wondering about the feasibility of such ideas?
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 4d
Those are two separate questions, without a strong public push for those things it’s unlikely governments will do it of their own accord unless they’re specifically trying to cut healthcare costs. But there are places with the things listed; you can’t go anywhere in Central America without running into a fruit cart, cities with good public transit exist, and places with public spaces that encourage exercise exist, programs to educate the public about healthy eating exist. Each thing is individually accomplishable.
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 4d
Nah. There's not really any significant benefit to making such changes from a government perspective.
seblin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
Nah, can do stuff like the UK did - taxing sugar - so that instead of getting less income from removing sales tax, it'd be more income from new tax
Khrux@ttrpg.network · 2 pts · 2d
To add to that, if weight loss peptides like Ozempic are working, let them work.
My mother, in her late 60s is obese. She was forced to retire early due to this, she has had lifelong self image issues due to this, and she's very aware that it's both robbing her ability to enjoy her later years, and years of her life. Until this year, she was staunchly against taking Ozempic due to potential side effects, but the reality is that the side effects of Obesity are so much worse.
For an analogy, there is a lot of evidence that the quantity of people who need to wear glasses has increased because in infancy, children are not looking at distant objects, and irreversible damage is occurring to their vision as a result. Of course this is something we want parents to consider in how they realise their children, but it would be monstrous to then deprive that person of glasses because the fault is societal.
Everything on your list is the equivalent of encouraging children to exercise their eyes, and is absolutely the best way to treat obesity, but medication should be considered as a treatment beyond this.
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 2d
And cheap non processed food overall.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d
Won't work. In my hospital cafeteria at lunch, med staff is lined up at the salad bar, patients line up at the deep fryer. People get a plate of fries and pour gravy over it and call that a meal.
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 3d
Why does your hospital have a deep fryer to begin with? I’m sure if they set out a pile of low cost cocaine they’d consume that as well, it’s silly to offer people addictive foods and then turn your nose up at them when they eat them; especially in the context of being in the middle of what is probably one of the most stressful events of their lives and likely wanting familiar comfort food.
Anyway, the only difference between you/your colleagues and your patients is covered by my second point: education.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d
Because the cafeteria needs to stay open and patients demand it. If we didn't have shit to feed idiots, idiots would order shit in. You cannot force people to eat well.
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 3d
If you’re just reading the first sentence of everything I type I don’t see a reason to continue
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
I have an 11 word tolerance for stupid. No idea what you are talking about.
FatVegan@leminal.space · 1 pts · 3d
Fruit and vegetables are already cheaper than whatever atuff their faces with.
luthis@lemmy.nz · 33 pts · 4d
Eating the rich has been shown to have a positive impact on weight loss and health in general.
Seriously though, this is the answer. Obesity is a systemic problem.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 4d
This sounds a little… cannibalistic
skooma_king@piefed.social · 2 pts · 4d
Also terrible for cholesterol. Have you seen what they’ve been eating?
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
Eating cholesterol doesn't raise average blood cholesterol levels, it only spikes it for a few hours. The body adjusts.
The rich are taking better care of themselves these days, because they're hoping to live long enough to reach longevity therapies, and eventually, immortality therapies, which they will very much keep to themselves.
cattywampas@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d
But what does that mean in terms of real actionable steps though?
BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 4d
Organize, educate, advocate
bizarroland@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 4d
And when that fails, kill.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 4d
People don't realize* that processed food is engineered to make you eat more of it. You'll also feel like shit for at least 3 days if you start eating fresh foods and you will crave the junk (cuz it's made to be that way), but it's worth it. The price is about the same to eat if you make it from scratch, but it's so much easier than you think. Your body will thank you. Also, if you're craving something sweet, drink water.
Examples:
Soup
Grill
Baking
These are just few.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d
Sounds like the detox diet in that spurlock film
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 4d
Do you mean the opposite? You must not have seen it.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 4d
lol. I meant his wife’s vegan detox diet at the end (the one above’s obviously not vegan, it just reminded me of the concept) obviously I didn’t mean the main diet of that film…
In any case, I much preferred Tom Naughton’s Fat Head
“Honey, I have chest pains! Quick! Get a tripod!!!” XD
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 4d
Oh sorry, lol, I didn't understand what you were saying. You can have junk in moderation, but processed food companies make it really hard on everyone to do anything in moderation.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d
Have you seen Fat Head by Tom Naughton? If you liked the Spurlock one, watch that one (it’s kind of a refute with comedy)
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 4d
No, we've been looking for new things to watch. I'll look for it. We just got done with Widow's Bay. Boy does that deserve the hype.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d
It’s on Tubi. Just stick an American VPN on (unless you live in America of course)
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 3d
detox diets are bullshit. Just stop eating crap. Spurlock's wife stopped being vegan and the cult almost crucified her.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d
And he died of cancer. They say it didn’t have anything to do with the diet, but it could have
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d
He had testicular cancer, but he was also a huge alcoholic. He didn't die of cancer but his publicist would only admit to "cancer related complications".
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d
Interesting. I’ve never heard what kind of cancer he had, can you provide me a link that says it was testicular?
Fondots@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 4d
There's not a single, one-size-fits-all solution, there's a lot of factors going into this
In no particular order, off the top of my head, a couple things that would need to change
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 3d
Non shitholes teach children how to eat in schools.
no one reads.
people have hours to sit in front of screens
i don't buy this. just lazy
Never will happen in USA.
No one can afford that in USA.
Fondots@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
1,2,5, & 6 - yes, I'm saying that these are issues that need to be addressed. What do you think you're adding to the conversation here?
3&4- yes, because after working, often in excess of 40 hours a week, commuting, running errands, and with little money left over to show for it at the end (ties into point 6) what else is there for them to do? People do not have unlimited energy or money. People are tired and need time to relax and enjoy themselves as well, if they spent hours reading or knitting, or tinkering with electronics instead would you still begrudge them that? As far as physical health goes, that's about the same. Planning and preparing a proper, balanced meal takes some time and energy, and a lot of people are running on empty, and if they want to have any time to enjoy their lives that may mean microwaving a frozen dinner or ordering takeout.
My wife has lost a lot of weight over the last year, getting up at the ass crack of dawn to hit the gym, and sometimes again after work, she's often leaving the house before 5am, and doesn't return home until 5 or even 7pm if she hits the gym twice. That leaves her with about 2-4 hours to herself when she gets in to have dinner, prep her breakfast and lunch for the next day because she won't have time for it in the morning, and do whatever other chores she needs to do.
Imagine trying to squeeze that in if you also have kids or other obligations you need to take care of after work, or if you work more than the 40 hours a week she does.
And sure, if you stick to a diet of beans and kale or something, it can be an affordable diet, but most people aren't going to last long eating such a limited diet, and a lot of the more diet-friendly foods can get pricey fast.
And food deserts are absolutely a thing, I live in one. It's a solid 15 minute drive to a grocery store, there is no public transit in my area, it would be the better part of an hour one way to bike there, and close to 2 hours if I needed to walk, and those roads are absolutely not friendly to pedestrians and bikes. If we didn't have cars, it would be pretty hard for us to get groceries, especially if I didn't have friends I could get a ride from, and borderline impossible if we were elderly or disabled (especially since I work night shift which further limits when I can get to a grocery store while I'm awake.) I can get a couple things from a convenience store and CVS that are in a somewhat more reasonable walking distance (though those roads aren't exactly pedestrian friendly either) but that's mostly going to be prepackaged junk food, if I'm lucky maybe I can get a couple fresh apples and bananas or an overpriced premade salad.
JigglySackles@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 3d
Treating it like the multifaceted issue it is instead of a moral failing would be a start.
In the US that would mean labor laws which favor the human instead of the business. With hours that allow more daily personal time and pay that allows prosperity even at minimum wages. These things would take care of most people.
It would also mean medical treatment being available without burdensome cost, and with consideration to it being a mental hurdle like addiction and destigmatizing seeking aid for it in that manner. Universal healthcare removing the need/demand for private and employment tied insurance would help this as well.
There are many more facets, and facets within facets to all of this, but from a mile high view I think this would help a lot.
xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day · 11 pts · 3d
I can tell you what I did. I went from 92 kilos to 69 kilos in a year.
I started noticing changes after 3 months.
Now how do you convert this into government policy? That is a huge problem altogether. Long term thinking + strong regulations. Even if you try something like this, you will be ridiculed for suggesting government overreach. At the end of the day, a diet is a personal choice.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
This works, I did it too. I lost 65 pounds in six months, and It's been gone for over ten years now.
But, that doesn't make profits for the rich and takes effort, so they made a drug instead.
xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day · 2 pts · 3d
If you reduce obesity, how will healthcare insurance companies survive? Won't someone think about the poor billionaire CEOs?
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 3d
Free healthcare including counseling, free gyms, shorter work weeks to give people more time for activities, and subsidize healthy foods so they're more affordable.
xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day · 4 pts · 3d
Thanks for highlighting counseling. I think people kind of ignore/underestimate the mental aspect of trying to be fit. A true long-lasting healthy life needs its ground work to be based on sustainable habits. It needs to be taught that fitness isn't what you do for 1 hour in the gym, but the full 24 hours in your day. At the same time, fitness isn't torturing your body. You need to reward yourself from time to time (but within limits).
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 3d
I'd like to add that this education and building of habits should start in grade school.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 4d
Kill corn subsidies.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 2d
Food science is about achieving what food scientist call a "bliss point".
Get rid of glucose-fructose and they will just use sucrose and acid to get the same effect.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
Then ban that shit. Stop letting perfection get in the way of progress.
isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 3d
We've invented the cure to obesity. We should be dancing in the streets and throwing parades for scientists. Again. We invented the cure to obesity. It's just a distribution problem at this point. We just need to work on getting the drugs out to everyone that wants them at a price anyone can afford. Do that, and the obesity crisis is solved.
It turns out that when you give humans calorie abundance, it just breaks a lot of our "full meters." And we can fix that with a simple shot or pill. Generations fretting and brow-beating people over morality and gluttony. Generations of forcing people to painfully starve themselves to achieve a healthy weight. Generations of shame, guilt, and cruelty. But all along, the real issue wasn't moral. It was medical. Or perhaps, historical.
The reality is that many of us just have a part of our biology that isn't calibrated for the modern world. We have satiation systems that are designed for ages of famine. It's only in the last few centuries that food has become cheap and abundant, and it's still not that way everywhere. You take a satiation system that is evolved for an age of famine, but require it to live in an age of abundance? Obesity is the inevitable result. Sure, you can always starve yourself into a healthy weight. But the point is human beings aren't evolved to have to maintain their weight through painful conscious self-denial. We're supposed to simply eat when we're hungry and stop when we're full. That's how human beings have lived for most of history and pre-history. And until the era of modern cheap calories? Our ancestors never really had to worry about eating themselves to obesity. There was only so much honey you could get a hold of, and it required taking quite a few bee stings to get it. Maybe the Lord in his castle had to worry about obesity, but this is a burden our ancestors never had at scale. We guilt ourselves for failure to maintain healthy weights, when that's just not something humans should have to consciously do.
But we need not accept endless calorie counting and weight maintenance through intentional starvation. We also don't need to return to an age of deprivation. We CAN have our cake and eat it to. We don't need to accept obesity or starvation. We can build a world where calories are cheap and abundant, but people can simply modify their satiation systems to achieve whatever body weight they want without conscious effort. Find a way to get these drugs to everyone. That is how you solve the obesity crisis. Some may not want to take them or have medical reasons they can't. But it doesn't matter. Imagine lamenting if we only cut the obesity rate by 80%. Simply giving these drugs out free to as many people as want them will inevitably be the most effective form of obesity intervention a government could ever do. Forget public health campaigns and presidential fitness tests. Just get people the damn medicine they need.
We invented a miracle. Let's share the wonder.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
The drug stops people from getting fat, but that doesn't mean they're suddenly healthy.
Here's what's going to happen with that. They'll take the drug and not exercise and still end up dying early. Because, keeping the fat off is, at best, only half a solution.
Also, the long term effects of the drug aren't known, they can't be, it hasn't been around long enough to know.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 2d
It means a hell of a lot healthier than they were before! We've seen that these drugs improve a myriad of health issues. The idea that they don't help with health is just cope. And no, it really isn't a half solution. Your health improves the same whether you lose weight via dieting or drugs. Because ultimately you're doing the exact same thing - eating less.
You're stuck in Christian cultural thinking. Instinctively you think any boon must have a terrible price associated with it. And we can't know the side effects? I'm sorry, but that is not how side effects work. There are not medications that never show a side effect for years and then suddenly have it show up decades later. A side effect can become more common with time, but it will show up in some people in the short term. People have been using these drugs for years. We're not going to see mysterious terrible effects show up decades from now.
By your logic, we could never implement any new medication. There would always be the risk of unknown effects decades down the road. If we followed your methods, we would have never been able to deploy the covid vaccine and hundreds of millions of people would have died. But thankfully that doesn't happen. We can test drugs in the short term and be reasonably confident of the long term risks.
I challenge you to find a single medication of any kind that showed no side effects in early studies, only to have them be widespread after decades of use. Show one medication. Just one medication that has ever worked the way you're speculating. You will not find it. The closest I can think of is thalidomide and its negative effects showed up very quickly. Thalidomide was the result of improper testing, ignoring test results, and it resulted in the complete overhaul of the drug testing process.
Drugs simply do not work like you're suggesting. Side effects don't just show up mysteriously after decades. That has literally never happened.
You're stuck in a Faustian mindset. Any boon must have a terrible cost. You simply can't accept a wonder of modern medicine when it's right in front of your eyes. It's not surprising. It's the same underlying belief structure of every anti-vaxxer.
PlzGibHugs@piefed.ca · 9 pts · 3d
Theres a whole host of issues, many of which are already mentioned, but two other big ones are treating it more as a health issue rather than a moral one, and improving healthcare - especially mental health care.
People don't realize, but a lot of obesity cases are tied into other health issues - especially mental health. This is doubly true for more extreme cases. For a very simple example, those who are neurodivergent often struggle with specific stimulations including food textures (limiting food options), especially in combination with food deserts or areas with little selection. On the other hand, this can often be improved or worked around with medication and/or therapy. Medication such as antidepressants or antipsychotics causing weight gain is another very common example, and while it isn't as easy to avoid, better medical support can make it easier to manage, especially if you need to change diet as a result. For a more extreme example, trauma is very closely tied to weight gain and eating disorders. Watch any episode of My Six-Hundred Pound Life (or better yet, don't), and you'll notice that almost all of them have significant trauma. For example, childhood abuse can lead to difficulty self-regulating, or sexual abuse can cause someone to feel that being """ugly""" will help prevent future assaults. These examples just scratch the surface too, and things only gen messier when you have comorbid conditions. Just imagine, for example, someone with OCD affecting how they eat, depression treated with a weight-gain causing medication, and PMOS (a hormonal issue common in women, which often makes it extremely difficult to lose weight). Doctors often ignore or struggle to treat any of these individually, nonetheless all three together, and thats before we open the conversation around affordability.
Given this, and just how sensitive and defensive humans are in general, that makes it all-the-more important that we treat people respectfully and kindly. Even ignoring basic decentcy, demonizing or mocking people for their weight delegitimises efforts to change systematic barriers, makes accessing care more difficult or unfriendly, often wastes time or confuses with "advice" that is unhelpful or outright destructive given the context of someone's medical background (I.E. telling someone with an eating disorder to control their eating more), and increases stress, which in turn, makes medical issues worse and harder to cope with. Instead, if we treat it as a medical issue, we avoid all of this and stop moralising or hurting people already struggling.
Katana314@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2d
There’s no one single approach.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
When my kids were younger we subscribed to a meal kit service. They would select from a limited menu, then we would get ingredients and instructions. It was great at teaching my kids how to cook. It was also much more efficient than trying to do the same from scratch: we already had the right amounts of all ingredients and simplified step by step. We saved time.
However it was expensive. I wonder if some sort of subsidized service like that would help people learn how to cook and develop the habit
stringere@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 2d
A localized meal service like that would be really awesome. Locally sourced ingredients where available, pick up or drop off within X miles. It might be hard to match price at scale bring smaller, but with a subsidy it absolutely could work.
Yeah, I know it's just reinventing the soup kitchen.
dil@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2d
A coop for meals not groceries would be nice
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d
What worked for me was living somewhere I could do a lot of outdoor labor. So I say replace all excavators with manual labor.
Radical_Socialist_t00t@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 2d
Switch to Scientific Socialism where people aren't overworked and in deep debt over shitty capitalism.
Whats the link? Stress, obviously.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 2d
People were also severely stressed in the centuries past (remember, the 8 hour workday is a recent invention). Less stress helps for sure, but the availability of calorie-dense food engineered to be delicious is probably even worse.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 2d
Did they have long hours before industrial revolution though?
girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2d
I mean farmhands would work from sunup to sundown. That was the profession of a lot of people pre-industrial age. I'm not sure what white collar workers would've be working but I doubt less than 10 hours on average.
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2d
Obesity was essentially nonexistent in Ukraine during the 1930's and China during the 1950's, before unscientific capitalism came along and screwed everything up
TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id · 1 pts · 10h
Hard to be obese when there's no fucking food.
xep@discuss.online · 7 pts · 3d
We can start by not eating highly processed, industrially made food-like substances.
aramis87@fedia.io · 7 pts · 4d
I wonder if part of it is because food is less nutritious than it used to be. So we eat more to unconsciously fulfill our nutrition needs, inadvertently also eating enough to help increase weight. I'm not saying this is the answer, but it may be a contributing cause.
Skullgrid@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 3d
not really. It's basically like smoking. The fast food gives you a nice feeling and you want more.
We know it's bad for us. It feels too good to stop and is an emotional crutch and people lose the ability to self regulate the context for the cheap, high calorie foods.
Source: am fat
WillieShen@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 3d
Make people even poorer, so that they can transform from too poor to buy healthy food to too poor to buy food
toxicbubble@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 3d
I stopped eating animal products and lost 50 lbs, so that's a start
sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 3d
Then meat being made largely unaffordable by the inflation crisis ought to bend the curve.
psud@aussie.zone · 7 pts · 3d
Ban every food and drink invented in the last hundred years
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
Dr Pepper was invented in 1885 and Coca-cola a year later in 1886.
psud@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 2d
Ok also regulate sugar as a drug of dependence
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2d
So we atill get cocaine in Coke. yay!
jade52@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 3d
Thread over. This is clearly the answer.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 3d
Teach children how to eat. In school. Countries that do this have much lower obesity rates.
EnsignWashout@startrek.website · 7 pts · 3d
I was taught how to eat in school, from a food pyriamid modified by producers of breads, dairy and sugar. :(
Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 2d
The US food pyramid was made by the USDA to sell grain and dairy.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
Travel to Europe, watch how people eat.
They eat meals, they don't graze all day
They eat proper portions.
They don't drink a pail of soda with a meal.
EnsignWashout@startrek.website · 1 pts · 2d
They probably live much longer.
But then that's more years of not eating and drinking to excess...so I can see it both ways.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 3d
I've been proposing that we tax HFCS out of existence for years now. Tax the hell out of all calorie dense sweeteners. When Dr Pepper Zero costs half as much as the sugary stuff, you'll see a lot more people making the switch
vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 4 pts · 3d
The opposite is happening though. HFCS only exists because of subsidies for corn, it wouldn't be cheaper than beet sugar otherwise, especially if farmers had to pay a fair price for the water they use.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d
Since the advent of synthetic sweetners, obesity, diabetes and colon cancer rates have skyrocketed.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d
You know what else has skyrocketed since the advent of artificial sweeteners?
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
tell us, because that graph doesn't.
starman2112@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2d
HFCS consumption was basically nonexistent until the 70s, which the graph literally tells you
Tehhund@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3d
This will be unpopular, but: just stop caring. Let people be whatever size, treat them equally, and don't sweat it. You may not like that but one way to solve an issue is to realize there is no issue.
Would people be healthier if they weren't obese? Possibly. The evidence is a little mixed. I'm in the middle where I think not being obese is healthier but the effect is overblown by related factors. People would be healthier if no one drank alcohol but I don't think banning alcohol is worth it.
(Revealing my biases: I've been extremely fit, I've also been technically obese, and I'm on a GLP-1 inhibitor because I want to lose weight. But I'm not interested in telling other people how heavy they should be)
https://www.the-independent.com/news/health/obesity-no-crisis-regular-exercise-more-important-than-weight-fat-but-fit-professor-traci-mann-a7833306.html
Bring on the downvotes, my body is ready.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 2d
As you've been both fit and technically obese, I suspect you also realize exercise is much harder to do when you're obese. Not just because moving your body is harder, but because you have less energy and thus it might be much harder to motivate yourself. It's a vicious cycle where gaining weight is even easier when sedentary and being obese makes it harder to not be sedentary.
And with socialized healthcare in most countries, everyone's paying the price. I say this as someone currently technically obese as well.
Luckily most people don't WANT to be obese, so GLP-1 inhibitors are a bit of a godsend. Forcing anyone to lose weight I can't condone, but giving people the best possible chances to be healthy seems like a no-brainer.
QuickSuccess@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 2d
I disagree. Obesity is medically proven to be unhealthy, and many obese people might just give up trying to improve their health, especially if they are told that there's "no issue".
Even if we didn't care about them or their health, society at large still pays for the extra inevitable medical bills, since we can't really just stop providing healthcare for medical issues caused or exacerbated by obesity.
Tehhund@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1d
So you agree that alcohol and automobiles should be banned because they are harmful to health and society pays substantial costs due to their negative impacts?
QuickSuccess@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 7h
I didn't say anything about banning anything in my previous comment, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. But anyway:
Automobiles have negatives, but also positives. In my opinion we shouldn't ban them, but if we can encourage reduced usage where unnecessary it could help people's health and the environment. But it would be silly to ignore the benefits that they did and do provide.
As for alcohol, I wouldn't outright ban it, but I would lean towards banning advertising it.
waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 2d
Thanks for this sane comment.
someguy3@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 4d
One of the best available interventions is mandatory cooking classes in high school. Cut the necessary time out of other classes and do it.
FatVegan@leminal.space · 1 pts · 3d
I had that in high school, no one cared, no one learned to cook there. In hindsight pretty dumb, but it is high school after all. If you don't want to learn, you don't. I just always liked cooking and the internet made it really easy to learn. But most of my friends don't cook at all. For them cooking is heating up chicken nuggets and spaghetty sauce out of a can.
someguy3@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
Mainly what you learn is that it's not this big scary impossible thing.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org · 6 pts · 2d
This is gonna be an unpopular take, but I vote for federally subsidized meth rations. I bet I'd be super productive and who needs sleep?
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net · 6 pts · 3d
I think most problems with obesity will be solved like this:
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
If it weren't taboo, people would for sure just buy mobility scooters and ride around in those all day.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 3d
Have you never been to Florida or any state fair in the USA? No one walks, walking is for suckers.
morbidcactus@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 3d
You absolutely can get addicted to food, others turn to food for comfort, some eat as a response to trauma as well (ever see my 600lb life, almost every person there has had some sort of trauma or mental health struggle.), therapy and other mental health care never seems to make it into these plans and that, in my opinion, is where they fail.
Most governments never seem to treat obesity as a chronic illness, just some sort of personal failing.
Edit.
Obesity risk factors are also genetic, no one chooses to be obese and the constant shaming and hatred people who exist in fat bodies get is unreal. I know fat people who are terrified of being seen even going for a walk outside because of internalised fat shaming, it fucks with your head something fierce.
I grew up fat which did not set me up for good habits later in life, I have struggled with binge eating and stress eating all throughout my life, getting an ADHD diagnosis and medicated for it was probably one of the best things that could have happened to me, others in my situation may not have the ability to get that help or be in a place they are ready to even seek it.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 2d
give them all ozempic or GLP-1. almost every method, they want quick fixes, or dont want do dieting or exercising or they dont want to do it. glp-1 has a side benefit in helping with other addictions.
waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 2d
People on ozempic loose around 7 % of their bodyweight and gain it back when they stop. Not a great solution to a non existent problem.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 1d
obesity a non-existent problem, you must be smoking something. obviously people were joking on surely on it.
Crackhappy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d
The collapse of industrialized society will solve it very quickly.
whoisearth@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 2d
The education system needs to be redeveloped from the ground up. It's a 19th century system in the 21st century.
Physical Education needs to be prioritized as does social engagement.
RaoulDook@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 4d
Ban all cell phone chargers except for human-powered generators. If you want to use a cell phone, you have to work for it by generating the power with your muscles.
Home / office hamster wheels, treadmills, etc - these would be the only things with a phone charger cable under my brilliant plan.
psud@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 2d
People who get fat usually can't exercise out of it. The more they exercise the more they eat. You need hormonal signals to switch from "summer build fat" mode to "winter burn fat" mode
Our food supply is always summer: fruit, sugar, carbohydrates. What carbohydrates grow in your region in winter? There are none in mine and none where my ancestors lived.
The only way I have ever lost weight to the point where my waist is narrower than my hips has been very low carbohydrate diets, and I have tried lots of ways of losing fat.
You can't outrun a cheeseburger
aloofPenguin@piefed.world · 1 pts · 4d
I have thought abut this before.... slightly appealing...
Fallibilist@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 3d
The issue has been pretty much solved. Now we just need to distribute the solution to the people that need it.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 3d
GLP-1 drugs are not a safe long term solution.
US society needs to normalize not eating at every excuse and eating like pigs.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
I'm not buying that the drug has solved this problem. That drug should only be for people who can't seem to make any other solution work, the same way surgery is used. It should not be distributed willy-nilly to everyone who asks and can pay for it.
Blaster_M@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
What needs to be done and what will be done are unfortunately never going to align as long as someone stands to get rich on it.
What needs to be done:
Why this will never be done:
This is not just an American problem. Other western countries have this issue as well, and I hope people in other nations see the danger and keep themselves healthy.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d
Be different animals or require life to be more physically demanding. The problem isn’t food, it’s just how we are, literally any other animal in an ecological setting like humans would have the same problem. There is no requirement in the modern world that requires humans to not be fat.
It’s not healthy, but to survive in human society physical fitness is 100% not a requirement. This is just us now.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
Yeah. We make it to reproduction age and get our kids raised. We can do that while fat and unhealthy.
The only motivations are social demands to be thin, and not dying early. We're working to eliminate the first one, and the second one is too far in the future for people who are somewhat fat now to worry about.
Capitalism doesn't care if the 50+ year-old people die, because they're mostly "used up" by then.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d
I don’t think there is a solid answer but the current political chaos points to one step
Looking at myself, I see portion size is the number one issue. Mental state also contribute, although I can’t claim anything treatable. So I eat too much and it’s a comfort thing but I don’t see a way for government to help me do the right thing there
Exercise. While exercise isn’t the main contributor to being overweight, it does go to state of mind. I’m much less likely to overeat when I’ve been active. This is where we ought to be able to do something to keep people moving
CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
Pay people to lose weight and then pay an even better rate for maintaining a healthy weight
Th4tGuyII@fedia.io · 4 pts · 4d
Firstly, BMI only really works for people of otherwise average height and musculature. A bodybuilder could be seen as obese for example. So just fixing for that would help.
But more importantly, and perhaps unpopularly, I think people have gotten too used to feeling full all the time, and that the slightest feeling of hunger signals red alert. I see people constantly grazing throughout the day the moment they get even slightly hungry, sometimes without evening noticing it themselves, then they'll still eat big meals for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
Unless you're regularly getting a good amount of exercise from work or your personal lifestyle, then of course you're gonna put on weight cause those calories have got nowhere to go. Now while there are other factors that can tip the scales into or out of your favour, ultimately:
Now some will say they can't not eat, because they can't concentrate otherwise, it gives them the shakes, or something else. But for 99% of people, that "need" is all psychological, and can be shaken off with time and patience.
I would know, cause I experienced this when I was younger changing my diet to help lose weight. Being purposefully intermittent about eating will suck at first as your body and mind adjust to the new status quo, but stick with it and your body and mind will be healthier for it.
((Just to be clear, I'm not promoting any kind of eating disorder or crash dieting. Losing weight sustainably is about small changes that you take with you into the future, not making huge changes that make you sick/depressed, or throwing your body around like a metabolic ragdoll. But I do mean it when I say putting more planning and restraint into when and what you eat will do you a world of wonder))
RBWells@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 4d
Good comment - two notes only:
BMI misses in the other direction much more frequently - very few people are overweight without being overfat, but many are overfat within BMI guidelines.
And secondly I don't think we can judge the appetite of an obese person by what we of normal weight feel. I can forget to eat for hours, and can't eat when stressed, I cook good food and enjoy it but don't overeat because it feels bad and gives me anxiety. Going to bed full feels dreadful, empty but not hungry feels best. Other people may feel anxious when hungry and comfortable when too full. My husband bulked and ended up fat (ish) because he said he just felt So Strong and good while putting on weight.
Th4tGuyII@fedia.io · 4 pts · 4d
The comfort-eating point you mentioned is why I stressed I've been there.
I used to have a really bad problem with overeating. Like to where I was classed as morbidly obese as a kid.
Which does add another difficult point I didn't mention. The motivation.
You need that to push through, cause it will suck to start with - and without motivation you're likely to go back to what comforts you, instead of forcing the change you want.
Again, I went from comfort eating to being able to being perfectly fine not eating for hours, and even being uncomfortable when full. It's doable, but you have to fully want to do it.
watson387@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 4d
To add to this, it seems like a lot of people in the US have a problem with overeating at meals. We just continue to eat long after we're full. I used to do it too. Stopping eating when you're not hungry anymore is a foreign concept to some, but can actually make a big difference as far as weight goes. I also feel better, in general, since I started doing that.
MalReynolds@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 3d
Just to add, countering that is most of what GLP1 drugs do.
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 3d
I am obese. It's a cumulation of
caloriesfactors. It's some part meds - which I have to take because society and I don't mesh well because I actually believe people deserve a good quality of life instead of profit over everything. It's some part emotional issues - I've had some trauma and I need some therapy but I can't afford the time and money. It's some part convenience - I don't have a lot of external support to take care of my family, so I have to do a lot and the available choices are usually focused on convenience not health. It's some part logistics - walking is not an option around my city and public transit is completely worthless.RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
Get rid of BMI.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2d
Is BMI perfect? No. But most people who cite its shortcomings pretend that the edge cases like extremely muscular athletes have any relevance to most of the population.
waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip · -2 pts · 2d
It isn't edge cases. The BMI tells you literally NOTHING about a persons health.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
In the same way blood pressure tells you nothing about a person's health, yes. In the same way a college degree tells you nothing about a person's intelligence, or their number of active friendships indicates their social skills.
Just because something is itself meaningless does not mean it is not a broadly useful indicator. But no, the vast, vast majority of people with unhealthy BMIs are carrying very unhealthy amounts of fat. There are some edge cases involving athletes or people with extremely odd build types. And the precise level of where we define overweight or obese really should vary a bit from person to person.
But I'm sorry, 99% of people with a BMI of 35 have a serious weight problem. People just citing Olympic athletes and other fringe cases out of cope and denial. BMI is imperfect, but claiming it's meaningless is just wishful magical thinking.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
You mean "Fit but Fat?", yeah, nah, fat people only believe that.
Lux18@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
What would that solve?
remon@ani.social · 3 pts · 2d
Why does it need solving in the first place?
DupaCycki@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2d
Because... it's a disease that shortens people's lifespans?
Aside from that, it's also terrible for the environment.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 4d
To solve it we'd need to start with horrific public execution of every living member of the last 40 years CEOs and whole boards of the food industry...
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 3d
Just regulate what can go into food.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 3d
Yes, after the executions.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
if you kill people for seeking profits, you're going to not have a lot of people left.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2d
For removing all nutrients from food and making it just fat and sugar to make it cheap and addictive on purpose and knowingly profit over destroying peoples health*
Those comparison between 1000cal of ultra-processed vs organic food never put the price side by side, that's why nowadays obesity is higher among lower income, multi-millionaire and billionaire CEOs and boards chose to poison people with low quality food just to sell regular food as premium, this is not seeking profit, this is being straight up evil
Zensate@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
The first thing to understand is that nobody understands the obesity crisis at all.
The second thing to understand is that the human body naturally stays at a healthy weight, just like any other animal, unless a person has become completely out of touch with their bodies. It cannot be solved with control or medicine.
The third thing to understand is that we teach people to dissociate from their bodies from childhood.
So we do not have an obesity crisis, we have a disembodiment crisis. And obesity is only one of the thousands of horrible effects it creates.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
Can you explain what do you mean by this? I'm trying to apply your statement to my own childhood and see the mostly the opposite.
Zensate@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d
"You have to force yourself to eat this even if you don't like it"
"You have to force yourself to eat everything on your plate even ifyou're full"
"You can't touch yourself that way, that's inappropriate"
"Boys don't cry"
"Boys don't get scared"
"Girls don't get angry"
"Boys / girls don't like those kind of things"
"You have to smile and be polite even if you don't feel like it"
"It's rude not to let them hug / kiss / touch you"
"You have to say thanks and smile even if you don't mean it"
"You have to be quiet"
"You have to sit still"
Children learn at an early age that they have to choose between listening to their bodies and staying safe by not angering their sources of love and survival. And should they be fortunate enough to have good parents, institutions and their peers will do the job instead.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 2d
I feel this so much. Had ADHD in the 80's and they beat me half to death. Now I'm amxious, depressed, burn out, and running on fumes in my 40s.
Zensate@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
Hate to hear it buddy
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
now explain why it's mostly sub regions of one country.
Zensate@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
Obesity rates have more than tripled globally since the 1980s, so it's far from one country.
Speiser0@feddit.org · 3 pts · 4d
What do you mean by that? There have been measures against obesity, the sugar tax in the UK for example.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 4d
True, but it’s not a complete fix yet
Speiser0@feddit.org · 1 pts · 3d
Oh, ok. But I doubt that this is a problem that one can or should (due to negative effects of potential solution, e.g. on personal freedom) solve entirely. As long as the issue is tiny enough, it's fine.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d
May I ask what do you think is the ‘tiny’ quantity you think would be acceptable?
Speiser0@feddit.org · 1 pts · 3d
So few that it can no longer be called a systemic issue. Or if it's not causing significant harm anymore. More realistically, it's even already tiny enough if nobody considers it worth it to talk about the issue.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
"You just eat less and exercise more."
(Or like, regulating the food industry and providing real grocery opportunities for everyone)
palordrolap@fedia.io · 3 pts · 4d
As long as people have cheaply available high-calorie, great tasting food, enormous portions and free will, you will not solve the obesity crisis.
To change any of those, you'll have to be incredibly patient and do it by tiny, tiny increments or else you'll create a revolt somewhere in society.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 3d
The upcoming food shortages should take care of it.
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 2d
Start re-educating treatlerites
solidheron@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2d
Well it would require a multi step and branching plan. Obvious you'd have to communicate your plan to other people to get them on board.
But obesity probably genetic. Like every human has the capacity to get obese if they have the processed food. You could edit their genes with crisper
HubertManne@piefed.social · 2 pts · 4d
same thing as my solution to every problem. reduce wealth disparity. most every adult who manages to get a decent life going tends to start excersising and buying more healthy food. Yeah some won't but the percentages would be way down. Oh and no raising work hours to achieve it. If anything less work hours so more time for healthy lifestyle.
thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
Global food infrastructure collapse would do it
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 3d
Hormone shots seem to be the most effective. Diet works but good luck convincing many people of that let alone getting them to actually stick to it.
lime@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 4d
what's your idea?
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 4d
Why thanks for asking! :) (nobody ever asks me my view)
One idea I had (and they’ll never go for it) is a sort of food redistribution system: take excess from places with excess food and give it to where there is too little. Obviously, I believe in balanced diets, mandatory exercise, etc. as well, but I believe that food redistribution is also something that might be a good idea because it also helps the issue of food shortages. Obviously there would be logistics (storage, preservation, transportation, etc.) that would need to be worked out, but I believe it is possible.
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2d
Stop subsidizing animal feed. I'm not opposed to eating meat but it's easy to get too many calories per bite from it. Farm subsidies for human crops in order to keep farms stable is semi reasonable though. Local food forests (such as community maintained gardens along walking paths where people live and parks) I think are a great supplement to peoples diets and amenities for communities but aren't replacing staples anytime soon.
Limit food advertising for any meal over 800 calories. Limit the amount of money that can be paid for food advertising per business.
Mandatory cooking classes in schools for all genders.
The rest requires more radical solutions. Unfortunately a big part of it is our socioeconomic situation. One example low worker bargaining power leading to too few meaningful after work hours. Another is the push for hyper individualism, cooking 3 meal for 7 people once a week is easier then cooking 3 meals for one person everyday forever. Few of our living arrangements are built for potluck or communal cooking though. The resteraunt experience just isn't it either because of the strong dehumanization between staff and customer.
The other being mental health. Both in part from above but also constant comparison with imaginary people (advertisements, celebrities, and social media profiles for example). Better crisis support(I.e. not just cops and grippie socks). Community support. More access to therapy and pychiactrics (including for this topic peptides like glp-1). I am biased towards the last ones being "last resort". Not in a "oh you're at a breaking point and need help, let's try talking to your friends first before we can prescribe you something" kind bs way, but more so assume we, as a society, are already doing the rest first but also have easy access to professional services.
Walkable cities would help probally both improve community potential and exercise.
Lastly, if we drastically improve work life balance, have better self esteem and community support, improve our food, we could see exercise be a lot easier to solve. Access to physical game spaces is one way to help (again IF people have time and friends). Physical involvement with the community (cooking, collecting food, cleaning up the community garden, etc) honestly would be a huge step away from sedimentary lifestyle for a lot of people.
fistac0rpse@fedia.io · 1 pts · 4d
mandatory meth
brakasha@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
education about food would help. nutrition courses starting from a young age (veggies=smart choice, fried cheese=bad choice) carrying right through high school (insoluble fiber=smart choice, saturated fat=bad choice) that steadily increases the depth/complexity of what is essentially the same information would help.
caloric density is the main factor in choosing healthy options, but what is equally important is giving people the free time and resources to devote to both preparing food and the act of choosing itself (planning/prepping meals, grocery shopping, logging or otherwise tracking intake). when both of a family’s adults’ work day has to include an 8.5-hour shift with 2 hours of commute/preparation time, child care, cooking, cleaning, exercise, reading a couple of books per month, and more, you have to start prioritizing. the first things to go are cooking, exercise, reading, recreation. so the more the working class gets squeezed, the more a work day starts to look like: a 10-hour shift if you’re lucky enough to qualify for overtime, eat on your commute from a fast food place, get home and feed said garbage to your children whom you are steadily poisoning now (just look into the effects of the ingredients and additives that go into a mcdonalds meal and tell me you would ever eat there again if you weren’t hopelessly addicted to those ingredients and the convenience), and then half-assing the rest of your life’s upkeep because you have no energy from being overworked, getting no exercise, and eating trash day in, day out.
the obesity epidemic is 100% a problem of modern capitalism. it stems from min-maxing your life’s profitability in terms of how you use your time and money. gym memberships are expensive and a routine requires 10 hours a week you don’t have. hiking trips and other outdoor activities take time and equipment you can’t afford. proper diet and cooking take time and money you don’t have. it self-reinforces when you no longer have energy to develop new habits and can no longer see a way out of it.
it’s gotten so bad that now people are cutting children and social interaction out of their lives because they don’t have the time, money, or energy.
instead of improving these conditions, the current US regime’s solution is to force us to submit by outlawing abortion and probably contraceptives at some point, to tie healthcare to employment status, to reduce public assistance and welfare, among other social paradigms that isolate us and disempower us.
Malica@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 3d
Glp-1 drugs
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 2d
Eating less and better is cheaper and safer.
bloviate@lemmus.org · 1 pts · 3d
Add glp1s to all sugar ingredients in processed food.
L7HM77@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d
There's no where to go, and everything is expensive. Pay people more, give them more time off, have city sponsored block parties. You can't make someone more active, but otherwise healthy and well-rounded people don't need much incentive to leave the house and take a walk.
After that, have a wellbeing crew that checks on and helps out those that are still avoiding socialization.
But the pearl clutching around wages and vacation means the local governments will do nothing. Any measure implemented without massive societal overhaul will only be a band-aid.
Also, you and I read studies like this, and think "we need to help people." But if you flip the perspective to who paid for the study, it becomes "we need healthy workers to feed into the meatgrinder." The goal of the study isn't altruistic, its to make sure the owners have a healthy livestock pool, which means the bare minimum will be done, or preferably nothing because we may be able to work around it.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
Redefine obese.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d
I think that the definition of it is a BMI over 25 (though I’ve also heard the BMI system is flawed in its own right)
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d
Two hundred years ago, you were considered smart if you could read. Now, it takes a lot more.
New day, new standard. 6' tall men between 200-300lbs will from henceforth be considered "Big guys" and 300+ shall be obese.
seblin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
Could start with a system that works for anyone else besides young white men 🤷🏻
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 2d
US AMA has already done that, twice.
myyass@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
People eating unhealthy food is partially related to their situation, it could be mental, it could be physical, or simply convenience.
The main thing is to have some form of exercise that people can do and that caters to their energy levels. Granted not everyone can, not everyone wants to. And sometimes, it's not feasible.
I wrote this in another post; growing up I would eat 5000-10000 (spring vs winter) calories a day and never could get past 125, but I also had gym and track in school, swimming practice, martial arts classes, and a military style torturous daily workout... every day. And I would still go ride bikes with my friends on the street or play tag or whatever. In the winter I would shovel the snow, which would probably be considered child abuse these days. Now I'm not saying do everyone should do that. I even toned down how much I did when I started college but I still practiced to be able to do a triathlon. It's a shame I broke my leg before being able to try one.
I would eat breakfast, two school lunches, have snacks, eat when I got home, and have second supper. I could easily eat a dominos pizza to by myself (probably did a number on my gut since I learned I can't eat wheat) and wash it down with some soda.
Now I bring this up because I worked in education briefly and ate lunch with the kids during lunch duty; I can tell you if anyone was as active as I was, I would need at least four lunches to make through the day. Sure it was the healthy lunch implementation, but I the result that I saw was that kids were lethargic and sure it made the classes easy to do since everyone was so docile but I think that was a terrible way to go about it. And I tried their "healthy" lunches out intentionally; if it we're not for drinking a whole pot of coffee a day, I wouldn't make it through the 14 hour day (school, after school, and commute).
Also, it's been so hot this year that my only exercise was mowing the lawn before feeling cooked. I wouldn't mind going to a pool but it's more of a hot tub. YMCA has an inside pool but I can't afford $95 a month. I can't run anymore because of the metal. And my two bicycles collect dust since I have to go to a trail or a park for biking unless I want to be roadkill, even then I can only do that maybe two to three months out of the year because of how hot it gets.
Even recognizing that people have dietary restrictions is a great start. I can't eat wheat or lentils, and certain fruits.
Quality, cost, and availability of food is very high on the list. And I'll be honest, food in America is some of the worst I've eaten and it's even worse lately; I've had MREs that tasted better than frozen food that I used to eat as a kid in the US. Mmmm, textured soy protein and emulsifiers.
I felt great and lost weight in Japan, Korea, Ireland, European countries. I was 165 pounds when I got back from Japan. I'm back to 200ish. Sigh. I don't eat out much and generally cook at home. The issue for me is that meat and dairy have become expensive. And eating rice and beans and vegetables barely gets me by to do daily tasks.
And none of the countries I've mentioned are perfect by any means but there is a bigger focus on food health and safety instead of spin the wheel for today's recall! It's like I can eat all the raw fish, beef, eggs, raw pork in Germany lol, shellfish and so on but this last year has been wild for food recalls. I mean ice cream? Can't even trust lettuce or a pepper.
tigermountain@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
Why is it the government's job to solve the obesity epidemic?
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 3d
Because they're responsible, in part, for either creating it or, thru inaction, enabling it.
FatVegan@leminal.space · -1 pts · 3d
So far no one has ever forced me to eat crap and drink pure sugar and forbit me to exercise.
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 3d
I'm jealous. If I want to balance all the responsibilities in my life, something has to give.
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
Your body forces you to, it's called there is another brain inside your gut that food scientists target. Instead of making super foods they spend their time making food as addictive and cheap as possible.
Ignoring this just makes you look profoundly ignorant.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d
This is not a problem outside the US.
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
Unfortunately, these food scientists combined with corporations exist everywhere now. Perhaps you are speaking to the fact that the US has far fewer gaurdrails and a laissez faire approach to nutritional health. I think in the US a lot of this has to do with regulatory capture and greed.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d
tquid@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 3d
We pay the government for it to deliver social goods.
One of those goods is health.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
The government is supposed to work for the people. I think it is clear that noone wants to be obese. So you have a significant % of the population that wants help. That makes it the governments job to try and help. Of course that isn't how government functions at all.
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3d
Sugar is in every processed food, even savory foods where it's balanced out with other spices, because sugar is addictive. They can't put cocaine in food anymore, so they add the next best thing.
I eat nearly zero-carb. I've been ketogenic for about six years now. I know exactly what I eat because I make all of my own meals, and none of it is processed food. No, it's not more expensive, because eating this way eliminates cravings and you eat far less but better quality. It looks more expensive on paper only because you don't realize you're going to eat half as much food if you eat this way.
One good rule is no more than two ingredients listed on the package. So, for instance, natural peanut butter includes only peanuts and salt, but the other stuff adds homogenized oil and sugar. They take out the peanut oil and sell it separately for a high price. I don't eat peanut butter, but it's a good example of the rule everyone is familiar with.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2d
Any tips on easy and quick foods to eat?
AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 2d
Depends on if you wanna do it in a more ethical manner or not. One way you could do it, at least for some places with the resources necessary, is basically forcing tech companies to subtly change your algorithm to slowly push you to believe that you being obese is bad... or that it's bad in general. Subtly make fatphobic content more accepted by you until you decide to try and change your habits to not be fat. Though, that could just as easily backfire and lead to a spike in suicide for people unable to do it, which is obviously bad.
Though, I think the better option ( at least in my country of the States ) is actual proper education on healthy eating and exercise combined with working on fixing the economy so people have more free time while also having a living wage and access to affordable healthcare.
waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 2d
This is an objectivly terrible idea and does not work like at all.
wieson@feddit.org · 1 pts · 2d
Compared to this "releasing the wolves" is a better idea
arararagi@ani.social · 0 pts · 2d
Mounjaro to all.
zikzak025@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 4d
Might not be the answer people want, but the most immediate fix is to increase the availability of GLP-1 drugs. They genuinely work well. It's not the "perfect world" solution, but it's looking at cutting the rate of heart disease dramatically, which means something.
The rest is systemic and will take a lot longer to fix. Not just making it easier to access quality healthy ingredients, but making it more advantageous to pick healthy options over junk. And part of it is also cultural, having to redefine an entire cuisine or adapt it to healthier formats. That type of change takes generations.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 4d
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the GLP-1 solution more of a ‘plaster’ (or band-aid if you’re American) kind of solution? (Not saying it doesn’t work, but is it just a plaster kind of way of working)?
isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 3d
Calorie counting is also a plaster. The fundamental problem is that people have satiation systems that are built for ages of famine, and we live in an age of cheap abundant calories. (For most people.)
Calorie counting is a cheap hack fix for a satiation system ill-calibrated for the modern world. Yes, you can count calories, stop eating while you're still hungry, and forcibly starve yourself down to a healthy weight. And many do do this. I did. Many times. But in the end, life happens, some stressful event interrupts, or you just don't have the energy to keep up with it and resist the hunger.
There's a reason diets have such poor track records. They're an attempt to apply conscious effort to a system that did not evolve to require conscious effort. And while that can be maintained for a time, it just plasters over the fundamental problem. And it usually fails in time. That's what I experienced. Through conscious effort, self-deprivation, and calorie counting, I could starve myself down to a healthy weight. I was healthy, but miserable. You get an irrational hunger for a completely unneeded meal at 10 PM? Just have to go to bed hungry if you want to stay at a healthy weight. No matter how long I kept the weight off, I never reached a point where my hunger levels adjusted to match what I was eating. It was endless self-deprivation. I can only maintain that effort for so long.
But GLP-1 agonists? I'm on one. And it has completely solved my weight issues. I wasn't even extremely obese or anything. I was at a BMI of 30. After a year and a half on tirzepatide, I'm down to a BMI of 22. And through this whole time, I've never counted calories. I deliberately did not do so. I wanted to see what effect the medication would have on my satiation system. And yeah, I found a dose that works, while the side effects are manageable, and it's completely solved my weight issues. I can now maintain a very healthy weight with zero conscious effort. And the side effects have been quite manageable. I maybe get a bit of mild nausea in the first days after an injection. But even then usually not. And compared to how much better being that much lighter makes me feel? There is no comparison. I'm literally in the best shape of my life (relative to my age at least.) Not being stuck overweight also gave me the confidence to find a form of exercise that works for me. My partner and I have taken up powerlifting, so I'm truly in the best shape of my life, by any measure of fitness. Frankly, as far as I'm concerned, from my own lived experience? We have invented the cure for obesity. Ok, maybe it's technically a treatment than a cure. But I would say it treats the underlying issue and by doing so cures obesity. Or maybe it's a cure in the sense of, "knowledge is the cure to ignorance." It's an ongoing cure. 😂
And so what if I have to keep taking the drug? Most adults take long-term maintenance medications. Vitamins if nothing else. And if five years from now some supply disruption would cause me to lose access? It would simply put me back at the weight I was before, with the permanent benefit of having lived five years less under the cumulative health effects of an unhealthy body weight.
I also see no reason they need to be expensive. I couldn't afford to pay retail, and my weight was never bad enough to get insurance coverage. I'm also a bit "chaotic good" in nature. So I'm taking the bootleg stuff. Just stuff from Chinese suppliers sold over the internet without a prescription. Sounds scary, but there are some reliable ones out there. And I've confirmed it's the real stuff by using it. And I've continuously monitored my health. I'm the healthiest I've been in many many years. And the cost? About a dollar a day. For a dollar a day, I have simply solved my weight problem. I eat when I want. I eat til I'm full. And at least in terms of my body and weight, I am at peace.
And I see no reason these couldn't get cheaper still. Wait until the patents expire! Wait until the massive generics really get going, making enough to supply billions of people. Oh, and they need not be injections either. Pills are in development.
The future is one where you can simply and affordably choose what weight you will carry. Want to be skinny? Want to be husky? Want to perfect your Henry VIII cosplay by becoming as fat as the old bastard? It's all just a pill away. Another case of technology challenging a fundamental assumption of human existence.
I wonder what effect that will have on culture. We used to value being fat because only the rich could afford to do it. We now value being skinny and fit because only the rich can afford that. What happens when anyone can just choose whatever body type they want with no effort and little money?
Anyway, pardon my ramblings. But I really wanted to share a personal anecdote. Apologies for the length.
RBWells@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d
Those GLP drugs, the news about them keeps getting better and better. Price is the big barrier - if they were not so expensive, there seems to be a benefit to staying on them. Probably because they reduce blood sugar, they are very good for your brain and heart, improve overall health beyond the weight loss effect. So I wouldn't call them a band-aid.
zikzak025@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
In a way. It reduces appetite, which reduces urge to eat lots of junk. But it doesn't stop people from eating junk, they just eat a little bit of junk instead of a lot of it.
The end goal should be to make it easier to eat healthy foods over junk in the first place, but that's a long way off. If we're talking the most direct way to address obesity as an epidemic, namely reducing the adverse health effects it has across a large population, the meds are the most immediate and impactful short term solution.
waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 2d
Okay i am assuming you are well meaning so i hope you have kept an open mind and are actually interested in "solutions". I am also well meaning but my frustration will come through in my comment. I am urging you to actually read up on the issue bc you have not .
There is no epidemic. Fat people don't need to be eradicated, be mindful about what you put out in the world, talking about fat people like THEY are a disease is incredible dehumanising. Other "unhealthy" habits we talk about are something you do not what you are.
Imagine we would treat everyone who isn't perfectly fit like we treat fat people, imagine people commenting on your body all of the time because you aren't jacked. We are accepting and even in favor of a level of virtriol towards fat people that would be unimaginable if done to any other kind of populace.
If you are worried for the health of people than go from there, what are the specifics you care about? Because i can guarante you thin people have all the same problems. I am thin as a stick but certainly unhealthy as fuck.
Here are some points for you to think about
There is so much more to it, one of my favorite health podcasts is "maintenance phase" give it a listen they talk alot about all kinds of health myths.
So just don't focus on weight focus on overall health and what people need to succeed and if people are still fat let them be fat. They can decide for themselves.
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2d
Hi, OP here. First of all, yes I am absolutely keeping an open mind. Second of all, I wasn’t ever suggesting that fat people were ‘lesser’ or anything like that, and I certainly never said any of the things you suggested I said in the post, I get that people do do that, but I’m not one of them and that is not the point of my question. As for your question about what specific things about their life do I care about, well quality of life would be one. And make no mistake: I’m not suggesting that every case of obesity means negative effects/quality of life. However, as I stated in the post above, 1 in 8 people are classified as obese, which amounts to approximately one billion people worldwide (I don’t know if you’d classify that as an epidemic) and I can imagine that a portion of those suffer from diminished QOL. Most studies I’ve read don’t contain figures for this, but they do conclude that there is evidence of a direct link between obesity and lower quality of life. If that’s not motivation to seek help for them (providing they want it, and I’m fairly sure a lot of them would) then I don’t know what is. I’m not doubting that thin/average/anything else people can also be unhealthy, but the root cause and therefore the solution is different for poor health due to obesity compared to poor health from lack of weight. We have to tailor solutions/treatment to help those asking for it depending on weight because each cause of poor health warrants a different solution. It’s not a case of singling them out as a group, it’s a case of tailoring treatment to that specific issue. And by the way: Im not the one who decided to classify obesity (not the people) as a disease. The World Health Organisation (and others) are the ones who classified obesity as a disease. They are the ones who classify it as an epidemic, stating on the website linked above. Heck, they literally have a page called ‘controlling the global obesity epidemic’. Furthermore, I’m not saying that we should force the cure on all obese people — if they are overweight, and have no issues, then no problem. But it’s estimated that 2.8 million people a year die due to complications of obesity. You say the epidemic doesn’t exist — 2.8 million people a year might disagree. What I’m saying is we should work for a cure so as to offer it, not force it. In any case, it’s their choice, but I still believe we should strive for a remedy so everyone at least has the option.
disregardable@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 4d
People have a choice. They don't want to choose to change their diets, embrace healthy eating, and learn to cook delicious vegetables. They want to keep eating a bunch of junky convenience foods, because it asks less of them. When they're ready to put the work in, they will lose weight.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 4d
Meanwhile people working 10h shifts with 2h commute still having to find time to do laundry and take care of their homes which they barely have money to pay the rent find out the industry removed all nutrients from affordable food they have time and energy to prepare and turned them into basically fat, sugar and chemical preservatives... there was a time in history obesity was higher among the rich, it was linked to eating too much, but now obesity is higher among lower income, and it's linked to the available food being pure shit - not to mention purposely addictive.
Regardless if you agree or think I'm a full of shit, I recommend checking out this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqLPYQRs6Sk
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
People work hard and long hours all across the world. This is only a problem in some regions.
disregardable@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 4d
I'm not saying any of that isn't true.
But the government can't make you eat correctly. If you want to enjoy eating healthy, it has a cost. That cost includes learning how to cook affordable, delicious, and healthy food. It exists. It can even be made quickly. But you're not going to magically develop that skillset by osmosis. You have to seek out new information and try new things. If you want to keep doing the same thing over and over, nothing is going to change.
seblin@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 4d
Wow, what a tone-deaf, obviously-did-read-the-comment response, thank you for reminding me how selfish and embarrassing people can be
disregardable@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 4d
I'm sorry the truth upsets you, but it is the truth.
FatVegan@leminal.space · 1 pts · 3d
There is always the comment from people who NEED to eat at McDonald's because their life is so damn stressful that they don't have 20min a day to cook and tge government takes their beans and their rice away. They basically force feed them Donut's. It's a tragedy actually.
disregardable@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 3d
I don't even mind these ones. It's the ones that insist that they don't lose weight in a calorie deficit that irk me, eg. saying they can't lose weight because they have PCOS. Like you can just say you don't want to lose weight. We don't know you. We're not the one stuck living in your body, you are.
lime@feddit.nu · 6 pts · 4d
ignoring the cost question entirely i see
brap@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
Can confirm. Been technically obese all my life, moaned about it but didn't really do anything about it. I started daily body weight exercise and watching what I eat recently and I've noticed a significant improvement.
If any of you are in the same boat, just start doing something, it's amazing how fast your body gets used to doing it and you can do more and more as time goes on. You feel so much better for it.
FatVegan@leminal.space · 1 pts · 3d
People also eat way more than they have to in general. Also we have a weird perspective on what is overweight now a days. People often call me too skinny. I'm perfectly normal and quite tall. Usually older and pretty obese people tell me to eat more. Idk chief, waddeling like a penguin with shot knees and an artificial hip just doesn't seem that much fun. Havin a beer belly is the norm
ReconciliationTime22128@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 4d
Fair point
CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 4d
1 fix bmi. Its completely wrong for people who are very tall or very Short making insurance more expensive among other things.
2 glp1 for all
Vanth@reddthat.com · 6 pts · 4d
1 and very well-muscled people
BMI shouldn't be used to evaluate an individual, period. It's fine for populations, like when comparing correlations across groups.
If already measuring height and weight, adding waist circumference greatly improves ability to parse out visceral fat versus heavily muscled.
RBWells@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d
Waist to height is the only proven metric, but as I wrote above, BMI misses in the other direction much more frequently. You are not likely so muscular you are obese, but skinny-fat is common.
seblin@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d
So many commenters forget that BMI was created based on statistical analysis of young white men - specifically, soldiers. Just like IQ tests. So neither accounts for age, height, race, sex, disability, financial background, illness, mental health, limb differences, etc and so on. BMI is only useful for evaluating if your average young white man is fit for military service, and that's it. But because it's such a nice number with a simple formula, it got slapped on everything. Which is shit.
Th4tGuyII@fedia.io · 6 pts · 4d
Not to be poo-poo on your answer, but GLP1 for all has the same vibe as turning on your heating with all the windows open. Its solves the issue today, but doesn't solve the problem.
defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 4d
Why GLP1 drugs though? I thought that was intentionally being pushed because food is intentionally being made unhealthy. It also doesn't address the root of the problem. Things can be done so that you don't need to take drugs in the first place.
CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d
I had making food healthy like Europe all written out. But that was scoped more to the USA and mexico. So replaced it with glp1. That would at least help the world eat under the daily calorie limit of shitty food
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 3d
glp1 suppresses appetite.
So just fucking eat less. Not everything needs a pill.
theherk@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d
Yeah the glp1 drugs are very promising for a number of things but absolutely clearly can solve the obesity epidemic.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2d
Sigh. The US needs to get over the idea that all problems are solved by a pill or injection.
theherk@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1d
It isn’t a US thing. I don’t even live there nor was it invented there. It just happens to actually be very good at several things. There are some drugs that have a high impact to risk ratio; this is one. Not only is it good for diabetes control and weight loss, it is so far as we can tell safe. In addition, it seems to show promising characteristics regarding dementia too, at least in some early observational trials.
Drugs are not the solution to all problems, but sometimes science turns up something good for humanity.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 3d
Dude..we have NO IDEA what will happen to all these people of glp-1 long term. Long term hormone treatments never end well.
numbermess@fedia.io · -2 pts · 4d
✅ Degrade/dismantle/destroy modern food delivery and safety systems
There, now you can't get obese because we made america super great again! 50 billion trillion dimensional chess baby!
87Six@lemmy.zip · -3 pts · 2d
Idk man but the root issue is people have a massive lack of discipline. With discipline and will, almost anything personal like this can be solved. I guess it's an issue of the education system... Not sure exactly
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1d
Ah yes, just discipline and will yourself to better access to nutrition and exercise science, balanced food options, and opportunities to do physical activities.