What about similar oddities in English?
(This question is inspired by this comic by https://www.exocomics.com/193/ (link found by BunScientist@lemmy.zip))
Edit: it's to its in the title. Damn autocorrect.
What about similar oddities in English?
(This question is inspired by this comic by https://www.exocomics.com/193/ (link found by BunScientist@lemmy.zip))
Edit: it's to its in the title. Damn autocorrect.
180 Comments
EndOfLine@lemmy.world · 71 pts · 334d
Just remember
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 334d
Pretty sure the past tense of "lead" is actually "led."
Unless of course you're referring to the type of metal, lead, which I guess the meme isn't clear on.
moondoggie@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 334d
Pretty sure there’s a chemical element named “lead”
_edge@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 334d
I heard lead leads in weight.
stinerman@midwest.social · 6 pts · 334d
Interesting if true.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 334d
And German has a word for it: Blei
gramie@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 334d
That would explain why a pencil, which contains a "lead" (actually a polymer or graphite now) is Bleistift
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 334d
Some call it differently because it doesn't contain lead anymore but Bleistift is still the common name
M137@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Bly in Swedish. But we add some weirdness to the Bly part so a "lead pencil" is blyertspenna ("penna" meaning pencil). I can't think of another word where that specific addiction is used, and I have no idea what it means.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 333d
I've looked it up and "blyerts" means "black lead, graphite" from German "Bleierz" (lead-ore).
source
leadore@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 334d
It's not saying anything about past tenses in that meme, it's just saying that each word has two different pronunciations that rhyme with the other.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
What's not clear? It's written right there!
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
It's all about led vs lēd.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 334d
I had to look this up.
And today I learned ALL my brit friends are spelling it wrong. That's more than two!
ech@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 334d
Brits aren't "spelling it wrong" any more than those in the US are. It's just cultural differences. Do you also claim Germans spell things wrong? Or the Chinese?
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 334d
Also the language is called English. By default, the English are doing it right and anything else is wrong. Maybe better, the argument can go for decades longer, but if anyones wrong its everyone else.
ech@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 334d
My point is no one is wrong. Well, you are, but not for the way you spell things.
wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io · 70 pts · 334d
My wife and I had a good snicker one time when I brought home edamame peas in the shell.
They were shelled, but she wanted them shelled.
Flammable/imflammable is another one that comes to mind.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 65 pts · 334d
As carved into history by Dr. Nick:
merc@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 333d
English has many contronyms.
Octavio@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 333d
Also sanction and sanction, same word but completely opposite meanings.
TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 333d
And the alarm goes off means it actually starts ringing. Weird language indeed!
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 332d
And this might just be a UK thing but if a person goes off it means they get really angry. And it can mean to leave for somewhere.
So a firework goes off which makes the fire alarm go off which makes the safety officer go off. Then he goes off to get a fireman. But he leaves the milk out, so it goes off.
everett@lemmy.ml · 43 pts · 334d
It's "its," by the way.
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 334d
This is the grammar thing I fuck up the most, and I don't call people on it because I'm pretty sure I don't know how it works. Autocorrect changes it & I just say "oh, whoops", and it still looks wrong...
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 334d
it's means "it is". It is really not difficult, just pretend you are Data and swear off contractions.
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 334d
I think the contraction vs possesive thing messes with me, and my brain can never settle on what goes where when, how, or why...
amelia@feddit.org · 8 pts · 334d
Just try changing it to "it is". If the sentence still makes sense, it's "it's". Otherwise it's "its".
Atomic@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 333d
Ah, thanks for the reminder to look through some TNG again. Data is such a great character and fills the role of the outsider looking in perfectly.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 333d
Plus he's a sex toy, which is cool. If peak Denise Crosby wanted to find out if I was fully functional, I might bust a hydraulic hose right there.
everett@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 334d
Here's a shortcut: test if you could drop "his" into the same spot and have it make sense. (And of course you'd never write hi's or his's.) If "his" would work, "its" would work.
wols@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 333d
My keyboard is very keen on completing "it's" regardless of context. I imagine this is the case for most people, since usually I see "it's" when "its" would be correct.
I also think it's difficult to know that "it's" is wrong to use because it feels like it follows the common apostrophe for possession rule:
"Australia's capital is Canberra" -> "Australia is the largest country in Oceania. It's capital is Canberra." (wrong, but intuitive)
pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de · 29 pts · 334d
Bought, caught, taught, fought, thought, sought, and wrought are all past tense verbs and all rhyme. The present tense forms are buy, catch, teach, fight, think, seek, and work, none of which rhyme.
capuccino@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 334d
Spanish is awesome. All its verbs in their regular form do end in "-ar", "-er" and "-ir".
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 334d
The conjugations can get as weird as English sometimes, though. Case in point: Ser.
bss03@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 334d
"que sera sera" es un ejemplo.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
How is that weird, as (nearly?) the only regular form of this verb?
capuccino@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
"Me voy a ir yendo" can translate into "I'm leaving", but it is funny because you are using three times, in spanish, the same verb.
Edit: I play with it and as a prank sometimes I translate it like if it were a chain of "going to". "I'm going to going to to"
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 334d
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/304867/the-wrought-wreaked-havoc-misunderstanding
Today I learned...
ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 334d
Me too, thanks!
merc@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 333d
And that's one of the sounds "ou" can make.
Inglish speling iz stoopid.
anothermember@feddit.uk · 24 pts · 334d
Fast can mean moving with great speed or fixed securely in place (among other things).
zerodawn@leaf.dance · 17 pts · 334d
The alarm went off so i turned it off.
otp@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 334d
My ally turned on me and then I turned her on
afk_strats@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 334d
The Chaos by Gerard Nolst Trenité (1922)
https://ncf.idallen.com/english.html
Very long. Highly recommended
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 334d
It's because the people who set the rules for the English language, could barely speak it.
The first guy to popularize the printing press was Dutch, so the guy who bought England's first one didn't know how it worked and neither did any English speaker
So he hired a bunch of Dutch who knew how to operate it.
And they got a bunch of handwritten books and were told to mass reproduce them.
Sometimes it was a mistake in the original, sometimes the typesetter made a mistake. Sometimes the writer just disagreed with how it should be written, and sometimes even the typesetters who couldn't speak English made choices to change it
No one gave a fuck about accuracy, it was about pumping out as many books as possible. Because just owning a book was a huge status symbol still from when they were handwritten and crazy expensive.
But all those books eventually got read, and the people who learned to read them were very proud that they could read. So they insisted that all the random bullshit was intentional and had to be followed to a T by everyone forever.
Most other languages had a noble class who kept it sensical, but for a long ass time only peasants spoke English, the wealthy in England all spoke French, cuz they were French.
Anyways, that's why English doesn't make any sense. There was also a natural thing happening where vowel pronunciation was changing. So when the typecasters solidified everything, it was already in a state of flux. That's why pronunciation doesn't line up with spelling.
kersploosh@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 334d
This also occurred in the middle of the Great Vowel Shift, a period when spoken English pronunciation was changing significantly.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 334d
Yep...
kersploosh@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 334d
I missed that, my bad.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 334d
It certainly doesn't help that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.
Nikls94@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
A French. The language where you have 5 wovels, use 3 for the word goose and the other 2 to pronounce it.
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 333d
What? The e is just silent.
Nikls94@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
The French word for goose is Oie, pronounced "ua"
merc@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 333d
If you look at an IPA chart, you can see how going from /i/ to /e/ to /a/ is a process of the vowel becoming more and more "open" over time (said with the mouth wider and wider).
In Quebec, the vowel shift that caused "oi" to have a /wa/ sound didn't fully happen. So, the word "moi" is often pronounced more like /mwe/ or /mwɛ/. But "oiseau" (bird) is still pronounced with a /wa/.
The modern French pronunciation of the Loire river /lwaʁ/ influences the English pronunciation /lwɑːr/. But, other languages use a spelling that matches the French but have a different pronunciation. In Italian and Spanish it's Loira. The Latin name was Liger. So, it used to have a /i/ pronunciation before the vowel shift.
tl;dr: modern French pronunciation vs spelling is just about as bad as English.
Nikls94@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Ils sont fous, ces Français.
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 332d
It's really not. Maybe if you pronounce an English 'u', but not a French one. Source: I'm French Canadian.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 334d
What I get from this is that if those English idiots had stuck to French, we wouldn't have this mess.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
More like if the French royalty hadn't conquered England....
England hasn't been ruled by the English for centuries bro
Ironfist79@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Yup. Blame the Normans.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
When people shit on the English, it's usually for stuff a small group of French royalty/oligarchs were doing. And they were doing bad shit to the actual English too.
Like the joke about "robbed the world for spices, used zero".
The royalty 100% used all the fancy spices and sold them to their cousins in mainland Europe. But the common Englishman sure as fuck couldn't afford them.
The most shit we should be giving the common English, is for not following the common French's example
Bluewing@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Oh god, we'd be stuck with all those silent letters
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
On the other hand, you seldom have the issue of having no clue how something is pronounced because you've only ever seen it written. So it balances out.
cabillaud@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Are you talking about Johannes Gutenberg?
SorryImLate@piefed.social · 14 pts · 334d
The primary accent for 2-syllable words that are used as both a noun and a verb depends on the part of speech. The noun places the primary accent on the 1st syllable, the verb on the 2nd syllable.
Examples:
The musician records a record.
The farmer produces produce.
You're not permitted to fish without a permit.
palordrolap@fedia.io · 4 pts · 334d
Potential exception: "Adult." Arguably because it generally isn't a verb when emphasis is on the second syllable, some people do that even when it's a noun.
I'm an Adult vs. I'm an aDULT. *
Use as of "adult" as a verb is non-standard and where to emphasise that is even less clear-cut for those of us who put the emphasis on the first syllable of the noun. Interestingly, "adulterate" is less strange as a verb and the emphasis is definitely on the second syllable there.
We could tie ourselves in knots analysing the late emphasis form as a verbified noun, re-nounified. Ow.
* The underlying truth of said statement is irrelevant. Chronologically, I have been one for some time. Mentally... ehh.
SorryImLate@piefed.social · 3 pts · 334d
Not an exception for me, I definitely use different accents for adulting / adulteration and adult. Maybe that's a British vs US English difference?
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 332d
One of my favourites is the word jam, which can mean:
And probably others, all spelled and pronounced the same way but with wildly different meanings depending on the context.
The other English thing I find super interesting is how there's a sort of unspoken but very clearly understood order to adjectives. So for example, if I say "The big old red wooden door" it works as a description, but if I say "The wooden old red big door" it sounds weird even though it's the same information. People aren't usually formally taught the order (as far as I know), but everyone seems to understand it.
joshthewaster@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 332d
Would be interested in more about the order - wondering if there is a name for that? I have been called out by teachers and friends and colleagues about strange sentences and it was often because I wouldn't write the 'normal' way. I've learned the conventions over the years and often find myself making edits to swap words and phrases around to meet expectations.
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 332d
Apparently it's called the Royal Order of Adjectives, and it's essentially: determiner, opinion, size, shape, age, colour, origin, material, qualifier.
You don't have to use all of those in the description, but that's broadly the order to use them in to make it sound 'right'. So for example in the comment I made above, it fits because I used:
in that order. I'm sure I was never taught that in any organized way (I just had to look up what it was called lol) but I still got it in the right order anyway just by typing it out in the way that felt right, which I think is interesting.
ICastFist@programming.dev · 13 pts · 333d
Welcome to english, where rules are actually the exceptions
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 332d
I before E, except after C!
As long as you don't count the word caffeine. Or protein. Or species. Or seize or heinous or leisure or weird or feign or their or reignite or any of the other 923 words that are exceptions to this rule lol.
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 334d
Where, were, we're. Even native speakers have problems with this. I don't know how many times I had to correct such cases, especially with American authors.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 334d
Pretty much only native speakers have problems with this, I see this type of mistake far less frequently with those who learned English as an additional language.
Samskara@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 333d
Exactly. People with English as a second language go from meaning to writing. Native speakers go from sound to writing.
There, their, they’re is something native speakers confuse as well. I have only ever observed native speaker write should of instead of should‘ve or should have.
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
99% agree with this. This is a native speaker issue, except where someone took up bad habits from the natives...
Bloomcole@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
That makes no sense since they would use it more, however native speakers from the US do have problems with it, and other words (they're/their).
Rarely encounter it with others.
Their spelling is embarrassing, same as their very limited vocabulary. IDK what they do in schools.
bigfondue@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
bigfondue@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Bloomcole@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Now there's a sentence I can't make sense of.
There is no influence of history in when kids learn to write their language or if they used it orally, they learn to write it then how it's supposed to be written.
If your reasons were valid every Anglo would have problems, they don't.
Since it's noticably the US specifically I can only assume it's sub standard education.
As confirmed by their poor vocabulary compared to other Anglo's
Bloomcole@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
That is still not a valid reason.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
It's true that I see it more rarely with the British. I suppose they read more or something.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Possibly, education is my main guess
mapu@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 334d
I pronounce these all differently though? [wɛɹ], [wəɹ] and [wiɹ]
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Maybe, yes, but as someone who has seen tons of unedited writings, I can tell you those mixup as common as muck.
Jyek@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 333d
This one has also bothered me because I pronounce all three of these differently.
ulterno@programming.dev · 3 pts · 334d
I never had a problem with those, until I started with stuff like Reddit.
Now, I find myself making the mistake and catching it in proofreading.
Guess my brain is starting to age too.
Agent641@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
There, their and they are...
ilinamorato@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 334d
"Read" and "readed."
merc@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 333d
English has way more vowel sounds than it has vowels.
Those are just words where the primary vowel letter is "a".
The terrible attempt to solve this is by using double letters, but then consistency goes out the window. There's times when "ea" is a single vowel sound like /rid/ (reed) or /rɛd/ (red). But it can also be /ɛrn/ as in earn, which rhymes with urn and burn. It can be /ˈɡɹeɪt/ as in great, where the "ea" is a diphthong and pronounced like the "a" in grate or vague. Or, for more fun, the two letters can each fully get their own pronunciation like "react" or "theatre".
We're really at the "bearn it all down and start over" stage with English. Let's just all agree to switch to español.
_edge@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 334d
Present: read
Past: red (in the fediverse), redd (on the old site)
Obvious.
hddsx@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 334d
“It has been red”.
So was the text red or has the text been read?
_edge@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 334d
Both. How do you know it was red when you have not red it? Someone must have red it to state it's red.
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
I can't reed
_edge@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 334d
"Read" is spelled s-a-m-e? English is a weird language.
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 334d
Wait until you hear about how we pronounce colonel!
snooggums@piefed.world · 6 pts · 334d
We pronounce it the same as the linux colonel.
stinerman@midwest.social · 2 pts · 334d
Good old Colonel Angus!
quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 334d
What about parmesan?
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Well I say that like it's spelled. I don't make the zh sound at the end of that's what you're referencing. I know some do though.
merc@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 333d
You pronounce the middle syllable as "me"?
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Par-meh-sawn
merc@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 333d
So, not how it's spelled.
2piradians@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 333d
On a different note there is Reading, a football club in UK, which is pronounced "Redding". This pronunciation is akin to the Reading Railroad from Monopoly (which I mispronounced all my life until today).
Little details, picked up along the way.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 333d
It's pronounced "Redding" Railroad?? All those times I sang "Take a look, it's in a book, Reading Railroad!" were a lie!
MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 333d
Reading is a place itself, the football club is the club for that place
merc@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 333d
Next you're going to tell me there are places in the UK named Manchester and Liverpool and Notts County and St Johnstone and Celtic and Rangers and Port Vale.
2piradians@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Indeed, I just blurted out the biggest association in my mind to the place
leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 333d
The digraph oo is pronounced at least six different ways:
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 333d
Are the first 2 lines really different?
Genuine question from a non native speaker.
Randelung@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 333d
first line is a long oo, second line is a short oo.
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Oh I see it now. Thanks for the explanation
Jyek@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 333d
That's the fun part, depending on your dialect and regional accent, sometimes there is no discernable difference in some of these lines. But each line has distinct pronunciation from each other in some dialects.
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Yeah I went through them again and see how it makes a slight difference but I am slavic and you can definitely hear it when I speak especially with my þ, ð and r sounds. The r especially after speaking for more than 15 minutees my tongue just gives up and I cannot make the weird soft english version of it. The probounciations I use are all over the place.
domdanial@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 333d
If you want to have some fun with US regional accents , Baltimore is a classic.
https://youtu.be/Esl_wOQDUeE (1min)
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Oh the iohn ohn uhhrn irn. That's a classic
vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 333d
Ehh technically I think they are the same but in common pronunciation they differ subtly. Don't overthink it though.
crystalmerchant@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 333d
Brooch and mooch.
But, aren't these the same sounds as boot / proof / boost etc.?
snapoff@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 333d
Brooch is pronounced like roach
isyasad@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 332d
It may be pronounced either way, and may also be spelled "broach", an alternate spelling which is very common although probably slightly less than this chart implies given multiple meanings of "broach".
I'm not really informed on this history of this word, but I think it's possible that the "brooch" spelling increased in frequency along with the pronunciation that rhymes with "mooch" while people who pronounce it to rhyme with "roach" are more likely to spell it as "broach".
ytg@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 333d
Floor/door and poor might differ depending on dialect
And the whole point of zoology and cooperative is that they aren't digraphs (hence why some super posh people write coöperative)
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 333d
Lead and lead as well. I got a lead on those lead undergarments you wanted. I'll lead you there later.
Agent641@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 333d
How did I get to the lead merchant? I was led here. But in the price negotiation, I took the lead.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
That works for your way of saying it but there is nothing wrong with the way I said it. You don't say I'll led you there later. My statement wasn't past tense at all.
Jyek@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 333d
Actually I don't think this one is true. Past tense of "to lead" is led. But also lead can be pronounced like led when referring to the metal or the element.
BunScientist@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 333d
I found it! https://www.exocomics.com/193/
IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 331d
Nice! Thank you
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 6 pts · 334d
Reed, red. Homophones should be homographs too.
isyasad@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 334d
What dialect of English will we base the new spelling system on?
Samskara@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 333d
Transatlantic English
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 333d
All of them. If you speak some weird rural UK accent you spell it differently. And certain people from New York, for example, spell curl as coil.
I think this would be the same in RP as it is in most American-ish accents, though.
projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 333d
The English language is so retarded yet we use it for international communication, and it is too late to stop it.
GandalftheBlack@feddit.org · 3 pts · 332d
The problem is the spelling, not the language. But the problem with spelling reform is that it necessarily favours certain dialects over others so you can never please everyone.
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 334d
Reed and Red
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 333d
How about we go with reed and red... see, you already know how to pronounce them!
Tattorack@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 333d
The comedic timing of this strip is actually really good.
Jeffool@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
You should wrede a book they wrote, and after you've wred the book, write your own.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 332d
I've never been a fan of read/read/red They're too popular to all be comingled like that.
Just place read/read with Peruse/Perused
slazer2au@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
Wind as in air moving and wind as in a pathway with twists and turns.
Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 334d
Read and readed
lgsp@feddit.it · 3 pts · 334d
Words in which I can never remember h and g order:
Inconsistent pronunciation of "ae"
And many more...
leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 333d
Façade is written using a letter that doesn't appear in English language keyboards (or in any other English word that I'm aware of).
Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Just like naïve
Witchfire@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Using loan words is cheating, but also disqualifies half the English language
leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 333d
Thing is, reasonable languages adapt loan words to their own rules to make their speakers' lives easier.
English, though? Nah, English just stalks other languages in dark alleys, stabs them, rips some random words off, and runs away giggling like a maniac, bits of the original language dragging behind, leaving a trail of gore.
That's how you end up with things like façade, or naïve, or fiancé, or the plural of radius being radii, or château / châteaux, or referendum / referenda, and so on, turning what should be a matter of just applying some standard rules into a veritable minefield of non-standard forms which must be memorised by its speakers.
Witchfire@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
It does make learning other languages fun. Currently in the middle of French, and there's so many words i already know. Eg:
veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
one would say that word is a
bampop@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 332d
"well" is a noun, a verb, an adjective, an adverb and an interjection
stinky@redlemmy.com · 3 pts · 333d
Looking up the etymology is often helpful in theoretical discussions about pronunciation and spelling :)
Fedditor385@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 332d
Words that produce the same sounds should have same spelling. Read in past tense and red is the same sound, so why isn't past tense of read - red?
Why most 'c' in words produce 'k' sounds?
Car and kar also produce the same sounds, so why C instead of K?
SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 334d
Read should be said "read" and read read. Read, on the other hand, I would leave as is.
DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
English has so much of this sort of nonsense. Like the fish can be spelled ghoti thing.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 333d
Except that "gh" is never pronounced "f" at the start of a word and "ti" is never "sh" at the end. The "o" is perfectly correct, though. Phosh.
DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Of course. But it does illustrate some of the confusing quirks of the language though.
Ironfist79@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
We should be consistent and say "readed". While we're on the subject, why isn't the past tense of go "goed"?
UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 333d
Be the change you want to see. Making people cringe as bonus!
Ironfist79@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 332d
It's only cringy because you're not used to it. If someone says "I goed to work yesterday" you would know exactly what they meant.
UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 332d
Yes and then cringe.
zaphod@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 333d
But you should still pronounce it redded.
nathanjent@programming.dev · 2 pts · 333d
But then it would get confused with "redead" which could be detrimental when dealing with necromancers.
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 332d
Although the past tense of write is wrote, so maybe for read it should be rode.... dammit!
radix@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 334d
Are reed and red taken?
Rudgrcom@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
Read and Reddit
JayGray91@piefed.social · 2 pts · 334d
Put: "hold my beer"
bampop@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 332d
English pronunciation is weird. It can be mastered through tough thorough thought though.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 334d
its, not it's.
Hedup@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 334d
Rob Words youtube channel is basically wtf english. And he has tons of content, and it keeps comming.
maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
what if we just change the past tense to red? simpler?
tomenzgg@midwest.social · 5 pts · 333d
Make it
redd, to easily distinguish from the color.Kolanaki@pawb.social · 7 pts · 333d
The irony with using Connect is that the text for "redd" being done in code format makes it red. 🤣
tomenzgg@midwest.social · 2 pts · 333d
😄
beebers@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
People already struggle with 'led' being the past tense of "lead". It seems like quite a few people extend the "read/read" rule to "lead".
In other words, I don't know if that would actually solve anything 😅
return2ozma@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 332d
English a very difficult language
https://youtu.be/d6DfsBd3iSk
remon@ani.social · 1 pts · 334d
They should be spelled the way they currently are.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 333d
They should be left exactly the same as an example of context.
callyral@pawb.social · 1 pts · 333d
Maybe to reed (infinitive) and read (past tense), but you can usually infer which one it is from context so no need to change the spelling.
vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 333d
"I read a lot of books about English spelling!"
Is this past tense?
BangCrash@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Depends on the context
domdanial@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 333d
"I read the magazines" isn't clear on its own, but with other text it probably is.
tasankovasara@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 331d
The meta aspect of 'shit' has to be up there.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=igh9iO5BxBo
Steve@startrek.website · 1 pts · 334d
Spelt.
merc@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 333d
Wheat.
Jankatarch@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Read.
Have read.