Hacktivist deletes white supremacist websites live on stage during hacker conference
https://techcrunch.com/2026/01/05/hacktivist-deletes-white-supremacist-websites-live-on-stage-during-hacker-conference/
2.3k points · 226 comments · view on lemmy.world
226 Comments
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 592 pts · 210d
Fucking gold.
KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 193 pts · 210d
The last 3 years of "White Supremacy" has me questioning the narrative on White Competency.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 54 pts · 210d
It's okay, you can say it: White Inferiority. We have NOT been sending our best. For a handful of centuries or so.
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 210d
I love this. I love it so much. I have to defend my employers shit every day, and they don't give a fuck.
FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world · 472 pts · 210d
Lmao mald harder
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 111 pts · 210d
The terrorist suddenly pays the victim when their terrorist site is taken down.
ICastFist@programming.dev · 28 pts · 210d
The number one skill of every nazi and fashit is pretending to be victims
cecilkorik@piefed.ca · 5 pts · 209d
It is always morally acceptable to punch a Nazi. No exceptions.
village604@adultswim.fan · 5 pts · 209d
I'd say it's a moral responsibility to punch a Nazi.
NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 100 pts · 210d
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 61 pts · 210d
I mean, it is technically true, but in a trial with a jury of peers it wouldn't matter. This reminds me of the old school outlaw definition. If you were declared an outlaw the laws of the land no longer applied to you. You could commit crimes, but it also meant anyone and everyone could commit crimes against you without repercussions. It was a bit of a given that you would commit crimes because if you were declared an outlaw you probably were already committing crimes, but now anyone could rob, harm, or even kill you and it wouldn't be a crime.
I say fuck these neo-nazis but this is cyber terrorism technically.
Soup@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 210d
I call it self-defense, honestly.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 210d
Eh, I want to like this statement because I hate these people, but I can't in good conscious call it something it isn't. This sort of thing is the essence of debate because we have good people doing bad things to bad people and then have to justify why it's ok despite it being bad. It's justice vs righteousness, it's lawful neutral vs lawful good. The only reason why this is acceptable is because it's against people that we deem not worthy of legal protection, but as a precedent that's dangerous territory. As soon as the definition of people not worthy of legal protection changes it suddenly becomes a problem.
At it's core this person probably committed a crime, but people don't care because it's against a bad ideologue. It's like if we said it's ok to round up and execute neo-nazis, a lot of people would rejoice, but if you change that to most any other group they would cry about human rights. At the end of the day rounding up and killing anyone is a bad thing no matter who it's against.
Soup@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 210d
At some point the scales will not balance well and you need to be ok with that. There is no paradox of intolerance, for example, because tolerance is itself part of a social contract that bigots broke all on their own and once that’s out the window they do not get to reap the benefits of it. Social contracts aren’t easy math but they do make sense.
This isn’t blowing up a furry website because someone thinks that’s weird. White supremacy is an incredibly dangerous ideology that has no place in whatever better society we claim to be aiming for. No one killed them for it, either. White supremacy built a website and a better person removed that website the same way one might paint over a swastika but leave the nice mural.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · -18 pts · 210d
I agree with the sentiment, but sadly can't agree with the implementation. Laws exist in a neutral environment, you can't bypass them just because the other party is someone society disagrees with. Even if they are committing crimes you can't unilaterally exact justice against them due to vigilante laws.
This event took place in Germany, Crimical Code §§ 202a-d criminalizes unauthorized access, interception, and manipulation of data, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment, covering acts like phishing and data espionage. Within German law this should be a crime. Germany has laws against neo-nazis, but this would be vigilantism which Germany also prohibits.
It's a slippery slope to ignore your own laws because they support the popular narrative.
Soup@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 210d
Look, I am aware of the dangers of vigilantism but I’m struggling to see why you’re so dead-set on this. There is basically no movement from those in power to actually curb these people and that’s where I start to care a whole lot less. Yes it’s still important to consider somewhere in there but hey, if the German government wasn’t doing anything about it then I guess that means they’ve passed on the opportunity.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · -13 pts · 210d
I'm not certain on much, but what I do know is that I believe in law. I like rules and I like order. Even more so I want rules and order to apply universally. You are arguing on the side of chaos against others with the privilege of law to protect you. That's all well and good until those same standards are applied against you.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 210d
Slippery slope is literally a logical fallacy. You are not making a logically sound argument.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 209d
You're right, using a slippery slope argument is a type of logical fallacy, but for it to be a logical fallacy it has to preclude a result and also be implausible in it's steps.
My argument was did not preclude a result and was more a statement of fundamental change in the nature of law. If you change the application of laws from a definite system (the law applies to everyone) to a spectrum (the law applies to some people) then you are now on a slippery slope where as before you were not. As to the plausibility of the argument, we are literally seeing this effect in real time with Trump. Laws switched from being definite to being suggestions and now no one is truly certain what laws do apply and to who.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 149d
You can actually, self-defense to stop someone from committing a felony is legal in the US.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 148d
In no court in the world would you be able to say you were acting in self-defense while acting from 6000 km away.
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 27 pts · 210d
Knightfox@lemmy.world · -14 pts · 210d
Nothing you are saying makes sense in the framework of legal functionality. You're basically advocating for non-gun castle doctrine in which you have the right to do whatever you want against people who you disagree with and who have the potential to do something against you. We live in a society where rules apply, when you say these things you should take a second to think how these decisions would apply if they were turned against you.
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 23 pts · 210d
Knightfox@lemmy.world · -12 pts · 210d
Yet you live in a world where laws and nation states exist. Just because you divorce yourself from these rules or think they do not apply to your beliefs does not make it so. You're commenting like a Sovereign Citizen in the US, but the laws and legal frameworks exist whether you believe in them. To a point you must frame your discussion in their context and if you do not then your opinion doesn't matter until you change that very framework.
If your argument hinges on ignoring the legal framework then you have to be Robin Hood or the Unibomber, anything less is meaningless.
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 210d
This argument does not apply to anti-social ideologies such as white supremacy that are incompatible with society.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 209d
Yeah it does, even mass murders are due the process of law and protections under it. We don't drag murderous sociopaths into the public square and execute them without trials. You can't fight for fair and equal rights while also saying other people aren't entitled to those same rights.
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 210d
Paradox of tolerance. It's absolutely self defense at the society level.
chaitae3@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 210d
Terrorism is the use of force against civilians to influence a nation's policy. This is not it.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 209d
I agreed with another comment that this is probably not cyber terrorism, because definitions of cyber terrorism indicate a wide spread impact on people while this only impacts a relatively small group. Your definition isn't quite right either as one potential goal for cyber terrorism is to cause disruption or fear. Terrorism as a general term may be politically motivated but it doesn't have to have the goal of influencing policy directly. Technically revenge can be a goal of terrorism.
Rothe@piefed.social · 25 pts · 210d
Technically illegal, yes, but it has nothing to do with "terrorism" though.
Knightfox@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 209d
You're probably right, I went back and double checked the definition of cyber terrorism and the main difference is scale of impact. To be cyber terrorism it would probably have to impact a larger group of people.
Hazor@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 209d
It would also have to cause terror. The people using these websites live in such an abject state of terror about their own inferiority that this probably had no measurable effect anyway.
yakko@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 210d
I think you have sense on your side there about outlawry. It existed as the photo negative of the golden rule, and it's a great way to make an example of people who break the social contract.
X@piefed.world · 18 pts · 210d
That admin can get fucked up the ass with shit-covered rusty barbed wire. They chose to be a shitwad, and someone chose to wipe them.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 6 pts · 210d
Sounds rad actually
dellish@lemmy.world · 379 pts · 210d
Lol. I like this Martha Root, I wish her many more happy hacking years.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 210d
Did they get it wrong? Like Grindr being suddenly popular wherever the Republicans have a convention, maybe the ratio is far better for partner-seekers than it looks on the surface.
qaz@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 210d
I looked through the data and less than 1% was looking for a same-sex partner
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 288 pts · 210d
based af and morally acceptable use of AI.
Samsy@lemmy.ml · 219 pts · 210d
Red Power Ranger: Red Power!
Blue Power Ranger: Blue Power!
White Power Ranger: Ahh no, fuck this shit... And who deleted my website?
Slovene@feddit.nl · 33 pts · 210d
Power Falcons!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mOyE_l80D4Y
natecox@programming.dev · 11 pts · 210d
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world · 193 pts · 210d
In the early 90s, my grandfather assured me that he fought and killed nazis, so that my generation would never have to deal with them.
He didn't say he cancelled the nazis. The word he used was "Exterminated".
Maybe we should all do that again. Exterminate the nazis. Because quite frankly, this government is lousey with them.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 67 pts · 210d
Nazis weren't exterminated, the US government hired quite a few (and that's not counting the ones who went on vacation to Brazil in 1945)
Maybe we should do it right this time.
Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world · 45 pts · 210d
The biggest sin of the American government was failing to hang every single confederate sympathizer. The problems only cascade from there.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 16 pts · 210d
This is where I am at where MAGA is concerned. It would be a crimson lining to a 2nd American Civil War, where I and others can free our society of Nazi kindred for good. IMO, the 1% of America are very likely to sympathize with the Confederates, because they believe that slavery of the poors is the natural state of things.
teft@piefed.social · 5 pts · 210d
The problem is how do you find them all? You never will since some of them are smart enough not to advertise how vile they are. And as long as a few of them still exist they'll multiply and spread their shitty philosophy.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 9 pts · 210d
That metric can said of just about anything regarding beliefs. The important thing is reducing the number of MAGA to levels where their beliefs can't really propagate anymore. The keys to that lies in eliminating the 1% as a class, by reducing wealth gaps and maintaining them at lower levels as an institution. This would require huge reforms, along the lines of the Magna Carta and the American Constitution, but for economics.
The 1% wield immense political power, because they hoard dynastic wealth and influence and can use it as a club against society. That is why they are the lynchpin of conservative projects, and so they must be removed as a factor, if a better society is to be fostered.
Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 209d
You don't need to kill every wolf to protest the village, you just need to kill enough that the wolf learns the village is a death sentence. The smart one's will always still be in the woods and when one slips they'll remind the rest why they hide there.
idiomaddict@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 147d
An anonymous internet allows Nazis to connect with each other without fear of social or legal consequences, thereby raising their confidence in/dedication to their ideology.
It’s certainly not on a par, but the same thing happens with weird kinks- I have one I probably would have forgotten about if it weren’t something that I then found online. Instead, because I saw that it wasn’t just me, I had the confidence to tell partners about it. And it was only because I found queer online communities that I was able to explore my gender identity and sexuality in the same way.
I absolutely support an open and anonymous internet, I just don’t know if there’s a way to stamp out bigotry and fascism while having one.
Or rather, I know how to do it, I just don’t know if we can. The answer is absolute solidarity among non bigots against anonymous bigots: cancel your contracts with platforms that host fascists or bigots, tell them and everyone else why, and get others to do the same.
Of course, at this point there are enough of them to have their own economy, so it’s not going to work now. This is more like the wound care to prevent a recurrence of the infection, instead of the infection treatment itself.
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
Should have let Sherman finish the job.
Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 209d
gramie@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 210d
Not to mention that the Germans themselves took a few years out, and then put a lot of the Nazi political machine back in charge.
Does anyone remember when Kurt Waldheim, UN Secretary General for 9 years and President of Austria for 6, turned out to be a former nazi? Whoops ie!
friendlymessage@feddit.org · 4 pts · 210d
You're right, but bad example. Maybe when talking about Germans, use an actual German example? There are more than enough, Kurt Georg Kiesinger for instance.
Jerb322@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 210d
You can exterminate an area, and not get all in the world.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 210d
Yes you can, but that still didn't happen. If you think there weren't any Nazis left in Germany (or even weren't in government after the fact), I've got some lovely ocean front property in Austria to sell you.
Jerb322@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 209d
Ok, they used the wrong word. Probably should have said execute.
vivalapivo@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 210d
Well, you can't "exterminate" a movement, idea, or people. You can only make it boring or not worthy of attention
some_designer_dude@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 210d
We should just never stop shaming for it. Someone wearing a swastika on the bus should be booed until their stop. It could bring the rest of us together, even.
That said, I think it might all be a distraction from society’s real enemies: the oligarchs.
ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one · 179 pts · 210d
Finally, someone who understands that you have to disrupt the infrastructure for Nazis. It's like the Ram Ranch Resistance. People have to disrupt Nazis and their gatherings.
Horsey@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 210d
Fixed the link for you 🙂
Ram Ranch Resistance
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 210d
Don't roll with pigs it'll only get you both dirty
Hey I'm just updating here. I said this sarcastically guys. You're not suppose to upvote this. It's a shameful cowardly wimpiest comment anyone could ever write. You're a huge POS if you ever wrote this honestly. Roll with pigs, fuck them up. Especially if they're nazis. You don't turn a blind eye just because your delicate sensibilities are offended or because you think you're just to important to bother. Don't leave it to other people to handle. You handle it. Put your fucking big boy/girl pants on and stop running away from these problems. Stop giving digital spaces to nazis.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 156 pts · 210d
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 210d
I'm going to say you shouldn't be shocked that people like this aren't the most insightful or analytical minds.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 210d
Or that the site owners aren't just two bit grifters
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org · 18 pts · 210d
They literally just typed
whitedate.net/download-all-users/into the browser and the website willingly gave them a button to download all users.Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 210d
i heard someone looked at thier profiles, something tells me they are all mcpoyles.
falseWhite@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 210d
yakko@feddit.uk · 147 pts · 210d
Based
Quadhammer@lemmy.world · 128 pts · 210d
What a fucking savage
L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works · 91 pts · 210d
I'm thoroughly confused about WhiteDeal.
A service where one contracts other white supremacists to do menial ad hoc jobs for a cost under the market price just seems so very antithetical to the whole "supremacy" thing.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 61 pts · 210d
I think it makes some sense. To be a white supremacist, you have to not think too hard. To be a libertarian and against minimum wage, you have to not think too hard.
Tharkys@lemmy.wtf · 0 pts · 210d
This is part of our problem as a country. Everyone has to fit into a box. I am a Libertarian, but I also believe in a universal basic income along with a minimum wage. I believe that a fiscally responsible government can and should provide basic services to its constituency.
fosho@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 210d
haha. then you're not a libertarian.
LePoisson@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
Yeah ... I know someone else already said this but you're absolutely not a Libertarian. So, good news, you can throw that box out and realign your language.
Also, I get that it's a talking point but I think everyone believes in a fiscally responsible government. It's just some weird right wing double think trick people say to imply the other side does not want that when in reality the Dems (if we're framing this through an American lens) want fiscal responsibility just as much as any other party or persons.
Tharkys@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 209d
You don't know anything about me other than the fact that I support two social programs. Who are you to say who or what I am?
Yes, those programs are absolutely not something that the Libertarian party would ever endorse. That doesn't mean I don't have the same belief in smaller government, states rights, and fiscal responsibility. I belong to the Libertarian party, that doesn't mean I have to BE the Libertarian party.
LePoisson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 209d
Ok ... So you're mad I said you're not a Libertarian and now you're just explaining how you're not a Libertarian?
Tharkys@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 209d
Truthfully, it really doesn't matter what you think of me or my views. My whole point is that the lines between parties is not nearly as cut and dry as people seem to believe.
Just because someone is pro-choice doesn't mean they aren't a Republican. If they believe in universal healthcare, it doesn't make them a Democrat.
Thanks for the conversation.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 209d
While it is possible to self-identify as a libertarian and hold those beliefs, you have to understand that it disagrees with the general concepts of libertarianism as understood by other people.
To put it another way, you sound a little bit like a vegan eating tuna.
Tharkys@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 209d
Contrary to popular belief, you don't have to agree with every single guiding principle of a party to be a part of it. Most of the country isn't on the left or the right.
Most of us are in the middle and only vote for one party or another out of FUD. I am done with that shit. I vote for the person I think is best for the job.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 209d
If it's not one of the two major parties, then your vote supports the person you hate most.
You can hate the system all you like, but this is just math.
Tharkys@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 209d
And that, my friend is the problem.. It's like trying to choose between windows and Mac os.. Sometimes the best thing you can do is install Linux.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 208d
That's not the analogy. The proper analogy is that you insert the Linux install disk, and someone else chooses if it installs Windows or Mac. There is no way for Linux to be installed. To get Linux, you need to change the system first.
Agent641@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 210d
They get paid in sense of entitlement too.
villainy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
That kind of cognitive dissonance is what leads some people to give up ideologies like white supremacy. The endless rationalizing of hypocrisy is fucking exhausting. It's a lot easier to just accept people as they are than build a whole framework around hating groups of people that allows for like, your neighbor, or an actor, or an athlete, to be okay because "well they're different than the rest." Or whatever bullshit excuse.
nightlily@leminal.space · 90 pts · 210d
DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 79 pts · 210d
All while wearing a Mighty Morphin' Pink Ranger costume - people DON'T call her a Power Ranger for nothing
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de · 43 pts · 210d
wearing a white power ranger outfit would have been too ironic
village604@adultswim.fan · 2 pts · 209d
Shoulda gone with the black ranger outfit.
Wolf@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 209d
That's racist
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 75 pts · 210d
Good. 🙂
FrChazzz@lemmus.org · 8 pts · 210d
Why Zordon look like Buzz McAllister in this photo tho?
_g_be@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 209d
I went to look up images of zordon and wow he did look like this
FrChazzz@lemmus.org · 4 pts · 209d
I legit had to look up whether or not it was the same actor. This is one of those things that, in the pre-internet days, you could say and people would just have to believe you. Like that legend that Marilyn Manson was Paul from The Wonder Years.
falseWhite@lemmy.world · 71 pts · 210d
Bongles@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 209d
FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone · 71 pts · 210d
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Szdz_R-LKNY
Link to the Talk. Name is "39C3 - The Heartbreak Machine: Nazis in the Echo Chamber"
The Talk is in german but youtubes subtitles are pretty good
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 152 pts · 210d
No need to use YouTube. Their own website has the whole talk dubbed into English, among other language options.
https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-the-heartbreak-machine-nazis-in-the-echo-chamber
aceshigh@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 210d
How do you dub it?
Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de · 19 pts · 210d
The gearwheel on the bottom right has options for language and resolution.
MeThisGuy@feddit.nl · -27 pts · 210d
ai probably
_edge@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 210d
Real people, live!
tja@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 210d
Nope
ripcord@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 210d
God damn lemmings are exhausting
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social · 3 pts · 210d
People are exhausting. The key is to just take a step back when answering every question gets to be too much. There are just so many of us that these kind of questions popping up is just a numbers game. Unless you are heavily invested, it's fine to let someone else get it.
ripcord@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 210d
?
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org · -1 pts · 210d
🤷
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 210d
You do know that it can be automated though, right? If you have full control of someone's infrastructure, the quickest way to delete all of it is through a script.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 209d
To address your first edit, yes, it's a script, and yes, it did delete the site and the backups, as confirmed by the site creator. You can browse the data extracted on https://okstupid.lol/
This wasn't "just a fun script". The site, backups, and infrastructure were actually deleted.
Did you read the article, like at all? It would have told you the same thing:
RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com · -2 pts · 210d
Dubs are for scrubs.
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 210d
Official dubs over ai subs.
RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com · 1 pts · 210d
Armenian Iguana
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 210d
Tell that to the Hellsing, Ghost Stories,vand Black Lagoon dubs profligate. Though all jokes aside dub vs sub really comes down to the quality of the dub.
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social · 1 pts · 210d
I watched black lagoon on sub. What was the draw? Am I missing the joke and it was terrible?
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 210d
Black lagoon legit just has a really good dub, same with Hellsing both the original anime and OVA. No the joke is ghost stories which is sitting somewhere alongside Dragon Ball Abridged and Warhammer 40k TTS in its shitpost nature.
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social · 1 pts · 210d
I never considered the abridged as actual dubs, just satire. That puts sword art abridged as my favorite.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 210d
No no no you misunderstood, the Ghost Stories dub is official. It is an official dub that is on the same tier of shitpost as DBZA or SAO abridged.
hansolo@lemmy.today · 68 pts · 210d
Praise be
fossilesque@mander.xyz · 65 pts · 210d
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 5 pts · 210d
Pink Power Ranger!
Red Power Ranger!
Blue Power Ranger!
Yellow Power Ranger!
Black Power Ranger!
uh...
Ivory...? Power Ranger!
fossilesque@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 210d
whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works · 62 pts · 210d
how and why did I start reading xitler messages
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · 120 pts · 210d
lol if he thinks the jews have infiltrated wait till he finds out how deep the gay atheist conspiracy goes
SaltySalamander@fedia.io · 29 pts · 210d
gaytheist*
donnywholovedbowling@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 210d
I love that band!
birne@feddit.org · 39 pts · 210d
Hoffmann and Fuchs are just common German names and are no indicator for being jewish. But yes, it obviously has to be the jews fault.
Bonesince1997@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 210d
They were having a "conversation" and all of a sudden the Jews showed up? What?! Lol fuckin Nazis
altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 210d
Insider info: the worst jews, the jewiest of them, are hiding in your local AI datacenters
kungen@feddit.nu · 4 pts · 210d
But they're invisible, so don't waste your time looking for them.
Nastybutler@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 210d
The files are in the computer?
Jerb322@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 210d
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 210d
"Which is funny cause the computer is the devil" -Big D
ripcord@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 210d
If you're not on Twitter, no clue.
If you're on Twitter, what the actual fuck
X@piefed.world · 7 pts · 210d
Reggie: Are they going to hack them to?
Would it bother you if you Nazis are being singled out?
Amnesiac: They hate us cause they ain’t us.
No, jack, we hate you because you’re Nazis.
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 210d
Oh, it gets way worse in those comments
Fontasia@feddit.nl · 6 pts · 210d
"Info sec is full of Jews"
What the hell does this even mean?
Suavevillain@lemmy.world · 57 pts · 210d
I need more hackers doing this. Great work.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 210d
Pretty ballsy taking down trump's twitter account.
NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 210d
goodboyjojo@lemmy.world · 48 pts · 210d
this talk was really cool. i remember her talking about this on mastodon sometime ago. glad she's ok
notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world · 45 pts · 210d
Get fucked Nazi scum.
I hope some well intentioned vigilantes use this information to make America a better place.
TheHotze@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 210d
Or in this case, they don't get fucked. It is a dating site after all.
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 6 pts · 209d
A dying breed
ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one · 10 pts · 209d
An extinction that I can get behind.
ranzispa@mander.xyz · 44 pts · 210d
I'd be very nervous: Did I place enough try/catch blocks in my lol.py?
Are all the passwords correct before I run it on stage?
Is this endpoint to delete an email correctly spelled out?
Does the WiFi of the conference allow connecting to these domains?
So many things could go wrong.
nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de · 25 pts · 210d
bah, you just run the script that shows an unconditional [x] done. you can check the details later!
Dlayknee@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 209d
That's basically what I thought when I saw this - there's no way anything is happening that quickly, this is just outputting "done!" over and over.
art@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 209d
That's fucking metal.
texture@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 210d
the title of the post and the thumbnail are bringing me a lot of joy right now
X@piefed.world · 30 pts · 210d
🤘😂🤘 Too much rock for one hand! Kick their asses and delete their shit, Martha! Fuck yeah!
Rion@lemmy.ca · 29 pts · 210d
The Pink Ranger was always my favourite 😏
(Kimberly, not Cat!)
Event_Horizon@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 210d
Amy Jo for life ✊
58008@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 210d
I so dearly wish I had these kinds of skills!
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 40 pts · 210d
Skills aren't magic, the idea of innate skills is a capitalist lie, you can learn them, if you're willing
derpgon@programming.dev · 28 pts · 210d
True, anyone can do anything, but try doing that while having a family and having to pay bills when living paycheck to paycheck. You gotta know when to join in and when to cheer.
StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 210d
I too wanted those skills, however, I have crippling ADHD. It's not as easy for everyone
markko@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
Just use your hyperfocus superpowers
/s
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 210d
I wish it was easy to bottle. Some rare days I'm fucking on it and everything is easy and I've got unlimited willpower.
If i could save those days for when its useful and appropriate...
fatal_internal_error@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
I am a self taught SWE with self diagnosed ADHD (not a clinical diagnosis) currently working as a senior engineer. You have to have intense passion and learn how to live with ADHD. It’s totally doable.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 210d
It's still possible, just you need to figure out a prerequisite skill first of healthy management of other issues
Heck, a lot of hackers have exactly the same thing.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -1 pts · 209d
Honestly, I think STEM attracts ADHD, AuDHD and similar, so that's far far far less of an issue than you might think
pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org · 27 pts · 210d
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 209d
The genius of launching an attack of this scale from an address space that is already jam-packed full of hackers, should not be understated. Id say that, if not for doing it live on stage, law enforcement now has a giant haystack of needles to sift through.
olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 24 pts · 210d
Talk link?
Edit: here it is
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 210d
I love this.
Also love this comments section.
Enzy@feddit.nu · 19 pts · 209d
Hope they dumped their shit on the dark web
nyankas@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 209d
No, they didn’t dump it on the dark web. They‘ve dumped it on the regular web instead: https://okstupid.lol/
REDACTED@infosec.pub · 8 pts · 209d
Oof
Rebecca_Corndogs@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 209d
A gender ratio that makes the Smurf village look like a feminist utopia
I cackled
Enzy@feddit.nu · 4 pts · 209d
Even better, thanks.
majster@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 209d
1:5 gender ratio. Perfect for incels.
the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 210d
Don't just stop at 3, there are so many more shitheads still out there.
desmosthenes@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 210d
what a chad
oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 209d
Now we need a website that we can add to that doxxes them that we can browse like a Nazi Facebook site, but frozen in time.
sommerset@thelemmy.club · 5 pts · 210d
How have they done it again?
GrammarPolice@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
c/madlads
DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 210d
I'm very glad my Mom, my older sibling Jeb and I DON'T visit those horrible websites (and NEVER will)
Cypher45@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 70d
I don't get it, 9gag is still up...
international9@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 189d
Zier@fedia.io · 1 pts · 210d
Sadly those sites are still up.
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 210d
I mean, backups exist.
Zier@fedia.io · 2 pts · 210d
But she deleted the backup.
CriticalMiss@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 210d
Not that I’m against but isn’t this illegal? Probably shouldn’t showcase it publicly
Agent641@lemmy.world · 71 pts · 210d
Yeah she probably should have worn a mask and used a baller pseudonym like "Root"
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org · 15 pts · 210d
*Martha Root
ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 210d
Babe Root
bearboiblake@pawb.social · 30 pts · 210d
Yes, it's illegal, the law absolutely would defend nazis, which is why it does not deserve our respect. Anyone who publicly breaks the law to do a good thing is a hero and deserves our respect.
K1nsey6@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 210d
Are we just completely forgetting that backups exist? Nearly every ISP does nightly backups. So yeah, it can be taken offline for a couple of hours, but that doesn't stop their movement.
Areldyb@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 210d
You can still punch a Nazi even if they'll just heal up later
Kilom@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 210d
SaneMartigan@aussie.zone · -21 pts · 210d
While I agree with the sentiment, the video showing them running lol.py did not convince me whatsoever of actual hacking.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 26 pts · 210d
The owner confirmed that they did it.
SaneMartigan@aussie.zone · -10 pts · 210d
The site owner?
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 32 pts · 210d
Yes, it's in the article and mentioned in the comments here.
SaneMartigan@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 210d
Glad to hear it was legit, fuck dem white power cunts.
When I saw the lol.py script video it seemed like something I'd see on a bad Mr Robot knockoff.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 210d
You can literally visit the websites, and the front page is up, every other page is a 404
It's really real.
CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world · -26 pts · 210d
Cool, but I think this is exceptionally stupid. There will be cameras, Id badges, emails, all with an easy to get warrant. I guess DE might make it more difficult but I think dumb none the less.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 80 pts · 210d
Personally I admire someone who is prepared to publicly take some personal risk in order to fight white supremacists.
kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 210d
This is an event that takes privacy very seriously, where it's not uncommon for speakers to present evidence of crimes, and where a large antifa-flag hangs over the entrance. I think they'll be fine.
The other two on stage where journalists, and while I'm not familiar with German law, that likely limits the police's ability to try to get to Root through them.
If reasonable precations were taken, there will not be any evidence directly tying the person on stage to the crime, and even if there was, them being in costume leaves a lot of room for reasonable doubt about who it actually was.
SaltySalamander@fedia.io · -11 pts · 210d
I had the exact same thoughts when I first started seeing this story pop up on my news feeds. Like, this person will see the inside of a prison cell for this, especially given the type of content hosted and the current make-up of the Justice Dept. What they did was, quite literally, cyber-terrorism. Hope it was worth it, I guess, given that these sites are all back online now like it never happened.
nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de · 10 pts · 210d
Depends. This happened at a German conference and I assume that this person is most likely German as well. Probably shouldn't think about getting anywhere close to the US though.
There's still the possibility of facing prosecution in Germany. Not sure how probable that is though.
CXORA@aussie.zone · 6 pts · 210d
Are you sure theyre back up? The article says otherwise.
clean_anion@programming.dev · 4 pts · 210d
That data might be easily accessible, but that was a choice Root made. I think that it is a safe assumption that Root knew most vigilantes keep their identity secret and, assuming a German background, had read Section 202 of the StGB and other relevant laws and court rulings. As such, Root most likely did this despite knowing their identity is at risk. It is likely they did this publicly specifically to inspire others, though I haven't looked at all the details and there might be a different reason.
Nothing in this comment constitutes legal advice.
vane@lemmy.world · -38 pts · 210d
I will call it censorship, how we know who is nazi whiteout allowing them express themselves ? Let them speak so we can know !
demonsword@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 210d
Free speech absolutism is bullshit. It only empowers bigots.
vane@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 209d
I want to know all the bigots !
_g_be@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 210d
The irony of tolerating intolerant people to exist openly is that it actually erodes tolerance overall
vane@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 209d
yesssss !!! bring all the evil from people so we can name them !!!!
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works · -65 pts · 210d
This implies they could have done it earlier....
blackbelt352@lemmy.world · 198 pts · 210d
Sometimes the theatrics of shutting down a nazi site is just as important as the actual shutting down of a nazi site.
Rhaedas@fedia.io · 87 pts · 210d
Punching a nazi in the crowded streets so much better than in the alley. Tell them we don't want them here, period.
"This is cyberterrorism." Letting those sites do their thing without cracking down on them... I agree.
bluGill@fedia.io · -47 pts · 210d
My guess is they started the site in the first place.
ripcord@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 210d
Well that's a really stupid guess
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 210d
Well that's why you're an idiot