Trump says US to start blockading the Strait of Hormuz immediately

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/trump-says-us-start-blockading-strait-hormuz-2026-04-12/

275 points · 100 comments · view on lemmy.world

100 Comments

ryper@lemmy.ca · 206 pts · 128d (25 replies)

"Effective immediately, the ​United States Navy, the Finest in ​the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING ‌any ⁠and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz," said Trump, who is strongly opposed to the ​idea of ​Iran charging ⁠ships a toll to pass through the strait.

"I have also ​instructed our Navy to seek and ​interdict ⁠every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one ⁠who ​pays an illegal toll ​will have safe passage on the high seas," he ​said.

Pretty sure what Trump is opposed to is him not getting a cut of the toll.

floofloof@lemmy.ca · 116 pts · 128d

Once again the whole world has to suffer because of Trump's insatiable ego and greed, and his bottomless stupidity. May he be gone soon.

KoboldCoterie@pawb.social · 61 pts · 128d

He did previously say that as the "winners" of the war, the US was entitled to collect that toll, basically. So, yeah, I think you're spot on.

andrewrgross@slrpnk.net · 44 pts · 128d (6 replies)

This is truly an April Fools-level move.

The US is closing the Strait? The generals couldn't open it, so Hegseth said, 'Okay! I've got it! We declare that WE'RE closing it, NOT THEM!'

How ... is this better?

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 128d (5 replies)

Iran was allowing some ships through. The logic is that if it’s closed to the US it must be closed to everyone (it was not before).

Do I think this is a good move? No. Do I think Trump and Hegseth have three brain cells between them? No.

But it also isn’t hard to understand their angle here. It’s not better for anyone. But the idea is to make it worse for Iran than the previous phase, where they had control of the strait.

electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 128d (3 replies)

Gonna be a hard sell to the rest of the world who is largely able to negotiate passage with Iran. US navy is gonna hijack ships enroute from the strait to China?

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 128d (2 replies)

I agree. A US blockade of Hormuz was actually always a reserve strategy to put a chokehold on China if they invade Taiwan. Now we’re just playing that card for no fucking reason at all. This administration is dumb as fuck and I can’t believe there isn’t even anyone in the military who can stop them. I guess that’s what we see with Hegseth’s long line of dismissals.

electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 128d (1 reply)

China is definitely not going to accept such a turn of events without response. I hope they give Iran some nukes.

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 128d

The US has worked steadily to make Iranian nukes absolutely inevitable.

andrewrgross@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 128d

I get the logic. But it's still really dumb.

fartographer@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 128d

Oh good. Nazi pirates. How did we end up with a real life plot more stupid than Water World?

ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 128d (2 replies)

No one ⁠who ​pays an illegal toll ​will have safe passage on the high seas

Does that mean they are gonna attack anyone that paid? Also when he starts charging does that mean they will destroy any ships right after they pay?

datendefekt@feddit.org · 4 pts · 128d (1 reply)

What I don't get is how are they going to prove that the ships paid toll? Especially if they are paid in crypto.

Oh, who am I fooling. They'll just harass anything coming through. Or maybe not. Maybe depending on which flag the ship flies.

CileTheSane@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 128d

They'll just stop any ship not coming to or from the US. Just like how ICE abducts everyone who isn't white enough, citizen or not.

SilverCode@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 128d (2 replies)

Illegal toll? Who's laws govern the strait that make these tolls illegal?

Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 128d (1 reply)

International law says that any toll is illegal.

middlemanSI@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 127d

Except if it is paid to the emperor without clothes...

random_character_a@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 128d (7 replies)
[ removed ]
yesman@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 128d (6 replies)

Lot's of people avoid using the word retard. But that's hard on some people because the loss of that word can decimate their whole vocabulary.

I support your freedom of expression; language is hard, and some people need verbal prognostics to make their point. It's rude to pick on people just because of a diminished capacity.

random_character_a@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 128d (4 replies)

By calling out the decline of Trumps cognitive abilities, I offended subset of people who should in my view never ever be called a "retard"?

I do apologise to anyone who still wants to identify as one.

athatet@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 128d (2 replies)

It’s just not necessary to use slurs. That’s all.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 128d (1 reply)

i'm torn. we shame them away from using this one, they'll just move onto the next. it's not the meaning behind the word that they like, it's the fact that it's a slur. hence the euphemism treadmill.

athatet@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 128d

That still doesn’t mean that we need to use it.

Also, we absolutely should shame these people. Let them move onto the next one. We will shame them for that too. Bigots don’t get to have things.

shani66@ani.social · 1 pts · 128d
[ removed ]
athatet@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 128d

My vocab is diminished because I don’t use slurs? That sounds like an incredible trade off. I think I will keep it up.

crusa187@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 128d

One of his many word salads involved an offer to split the tolls between us and Iran, so yeah, that’s what he wants. The dummy simply didn’t realize access to the strait was so valuable until after the bombs started dropping.

JaumeI@programming.dev · 136 pts · 128d (15 replies)

Isn't that... piracy? Not USAs waters, not USAs petrol...

Pickleideas@lemmy.world · 95 pts · 128d (7 replies)

Hasn't stopped them from stealing oil from Venezuela and Cuba

JaumeI@programming.dev · 9 pts · 128d (6 replies)

Sure it hasn't. But now they are ruining the pockets of the whole world.

Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 128d (4 replies)

Expect it to continue because he isn't going to stop while he has power.

JaumeI@programming.dev · 10 pts · 128d (3 replies)

Our only hope is that Europe and China get tired of the crybaby and begin to do something for real, I guess.

Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 128d (2 replies)

Yeah. It's obvious the Americans won't do anything.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 128d (1 reply)

those people being rounded up and sent off to camps where they're disappearing? how dare they be rounded up and disappear instead of dying at the problem for us.

Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 128d

No I mean the 350+ million other Americans who continue going to work every day to keep the corrupt fascist machine running.

WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social · 1 pts · 127d

They have been for a while.

flandish@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 128d (4 replies)

no. it’s invasion and war.

JaumeI@programming.dev · 2 pts · 128d (3 replies)

Yes , but now they are the ones making everyone's petrol much more expensive, if it even gets there.

flandish@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 128d (2 replies)

yes and. :)

JaumeI@programming.dev · 2 pts · 128d (1 reply)

One can hope than (sadly) onlu then, some countries might intervene for real.

flandish@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 128d

i fuckin hope so. last time it took a few million russians to take down berlin. dc is a bit more of a walk.

rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 128d

Sure sounds like it's more piracy to me.

sturmblast@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 127d

Yup

Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org · 83 pts · 128d (16 replies)

Wasn't Iran already doing that before and wasn't the main goal to open it up again?

magnue@lemmy.world · 71 pts · 128d (1 reply)

Yeah but if they say it this way it sounds like they're in control of the situation

Eril@feddit.org · 10 pts · 128d

It's so in a few days he can "re-open" the strait again, declaring that everything is back to normal: "No president ever opened as many straits as I did"

mctoasterson@reddthat.com · 19 pts · 128d (10 replies)

The idea being to choke off Iran's ability to use it at all. This kills their remaining income stream and also incents the Chinese and others who thought they had a workaround (the tolls) to instead put pressure on Iran.

marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 128d (5 replies)
[ removed ]
MartianSands@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 128d (2 replies)

The fact that it's a bad idea doesn't mean that isn't the reason

marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 128d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
PoastRotato@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 128d

This is not news

plyth@feddit.org · 1 pts · 128d

Are the pipelines still operational?

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 128d

iran can ship it through central asia, or other asian countries overland .

NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 128d

But that only works if the US is willing to start attacking unarmed oil tankers, which will do no favors for their international support.

If they hadn’t alienated all their allies, they could build an embargo until the straits were opened but that ship had sailed.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 128d

China is both extremely well supplied with Oil, and aggressively weaning itself off of oil. It's everyone else in Asia who are now pressured to get closer to China from this. Asia cutting US off from Chips, and selling to China instead, until US leaves the Gulf region, is the most effective action. Diplomatically, asserting that the US/Israel illegal war is the primary source of fuel and helium shortages needed to make chips, industry needs to focus on serving friendly country needs first.

ripcord@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 128d

The idea being to kill off Iran's leverage, which is control of the Strait.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 128d

it wasnt being used all for the most part its not that hard, and not some genius plan by trump. besides russia and china has other ways of getting around it anyways.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 128d

In Hegseth's voice... Why can't you idiots understand how clear our, sorry I mean our great President's, mission has always been. We needed to start this excursion, because Iran was about to extort the world through a blockade. It's extortion when Iran does it. We are liberating the world when we extort, uhm ... uhm... liberate them from Iranian extortion. To pre-empt some of the news you will hear later this week. Iran was already threatening the region with opening Trump branded golf courses on its soil, and so America needed to make sure our friends in the region did so before hand. Radical left wing media not understanding that we won the war because 10 more Trump golf courses are opening in Gulf and 0 in Iran, just don't understand that freedom isn't free.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 128d

yes, trump is doing 2 things right now, try and pump and dump the markets and continued distraction from epstein files. given how bondi was replaced very quickly BY BLANCHE, and suddenly melania coming out of the woodwork to give a "i did not help diddle kids" speech.

Blackmist@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 128d

I'm still trying to work out if this one's a late April Fool...

Imagine working for the man. You just hear crazy shit day in, day out, and have to quickly adapt and run with it, otherwise he'll find another mug who will.

finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 128d (1 reply)

Is it my imagination, or is that stretch of water and the water surrounding it not US territory, thus making what he wants to do (interdict) kind of ... piracy?

Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 pts · 128d

Blockading is considered an act of war

whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 44 pts · 128d (1 reply)

Art of the idiot

Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works · 26 pts · 128d

GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 39 pts · 128d (3 replies)

I think he's just pissed off that Iran is letting Chinese ships thorough. So now the question is whether Trump is stupid and deranged enough to attack any Chinese ships that ignore this illegal blockade, which would probably kick off World War 3 in earnest.

NotSteve_@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 128d

If it broke out in WW3 then I think most of the world's public support would be behind China. The US has always been a hostile bully but Americans generally kept it contained to poorer countries that didn't have as much of a voice. Now though...

brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 128d

That's not Xi's style. I don't think he'd try unless he wants a plausible excuse to kick off a Taiwan assault.

...And, as far as my understanding goes, if Xi wants to do it, now would be an optimal time. Wait any longer, and Taiwan will just get more fortified.

redsand@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 127d

Why do that when they can just sell bonds and watch Bessent have a stroke on TV

Akh@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 128d (2 replies)

He cant blockade something controlled by someone else who already shut it.

FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 128d (1 reply)

“You can’t quit, you’re fired!”

stephan262@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 128d

Well if you're going to fire me, I'm gonna fire the warehouse.

ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com · 31 pts · 128d

He wants the money, that Iran wasn't charging before he invaded, for himself is as near I can figure. Master negotiator with a grand plan.

hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 128d (3 replies)

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 128d (2 replies)

Lol is that a sea mine XD

chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 127d (1 reply)

(Apologies if you were just making a joke) It's an old but gold comic, and the object is just a device. Like a macguffin.

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 127d

No i didn't know the origin but it's funny it still looks like a sea mine lol

friend_of_satan@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 128d (1 reply)

Open the fucking strait you crazy bastard!

some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 128d

Hail Satan!

crystalmerchant@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 128d

Boy it turns out that George Lucas sure was right about the importance of blockading a trade route

Murse@slrpnk.net · 18 pts · 128d (2 replies)

Surely this time people will stop talking about the Epstein files...

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 128d

especially when melania made a speech how she "wasnt involved in diddling kids,or helped diddle kids"

6stringringer@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 128d

I mean like, right? 🤔

roguetrick@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 128d

Jesus Christ. I certainly didn't have this on my rapidly flailing bingo card of the US punching itself in the face.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 17 pts · 128d (1 reply)

What's next: America blowing up its own bases in the Middle East? Killing its own soldiers? Crashing its own planes?

blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 128d

The plane crashing thing already happened, after the DEI purge

orlyowl@piefed.ca · 15 pts · 128d

This is a terrifyingly ridiculous timeline we find ourselves in.

redsand@infosec.pub · 13 pts · 128d

1000004815

BigMacHole@thelemmy.club · 11 pts · 128d

Open Close the STRAIT!

-Trump!

rayyy@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 128d

That's bound to increase the price of oil.

HubertManne@piefed.social · 8 pts · 128d

this goes back to are trumps decisions based on some long odd bets on the totally not maninpualted gambling markets.

Wataba@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 128d

The American military are legitimate targets.

rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 128d

“Effective immediately, the ​United States Navy, the Finest in ​the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING ‌any ⁠and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz,”

Or what?

Klox@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 128d

Lmfao, the guy knows a thing or two about illegal taxation extortion.

Steve@startrek.website · 6 pts · 128d

What a stupid piece of shit

CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 128d (2 replies)

I guess now we find out how defensible the strait

If Iran can close it thoroughly, they can also keep the US Navy pretty busy. How many Shahed does it take to disable a destroyer? We will find out.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 128d

The US can blockade the entrance to Persian Gulf which is further away from Iran. Oil tankers are lightly armed/defended and slower than Aircraft carrier fighter jets.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 128d

you can just throw hundreds at one, and spend less than one of thier US missiles.

sturmblast@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 127d

These morons....

gdog05@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 128d

There are a lot of people who want this level of destabilization and interruption of goods and energy security. Techno feudalists want this. Trump needs to feel powerful, so someone like Peter Theil who is trying to bring about Armageddon could easily convince Trump that this move makes him look powerful instead of a target by the rest of the world.

MonsterMonster@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 128d

And the twist in the plot is that Iran unblocks the Strait of Hormuz.

tacoplease@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 128d

Notorious pirate Captain Jackoff Turkey

jacksilver@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 128d (3 replies)

Im surprised by the comments here, this was an obvious outcome of Iran dictating that only Iranian interests could use the strait. The only real move for the US is to block all traffic (or at least all traffic heading to Iran). Why would the US allow Iran to continue to sell oil while Iran is destroying other ships.

I'm sure the GCC have no issue with this policy, and it doesn't really change the situation for most other US aligned countries as they weren't buying Iranian oil for the most part anyways. No one wants Iran to be able to charge for access to the Strait and this would put pressure on the to find a more agreeable end to the conflict.

Not supporting either side, just stating that this is a reasonable strategic move for the US.

roguetrick@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 128d (1 reply)

Because the US cannot both declare freedom of navigation as the most important part of the straight while also blockading non-US allies which they've explicitly threatened to do. If you approach it from a realpolitik angle like you are right now, then it justifies Iran's actions in closing the straight from that very perspective. The US will not get to have it both ways. Either Iran was justified in closing the straight in response to US aggression or the US is violating international law and general principles of trade.

jacksilver@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 128d

You make it sound like blockades are not common events during a war. Just cause the US is blockading the strait right now doesn't negate their desire for free passage in the future.

Additionally, if people didn't think Iran was justified in closing the strait (due to a war) then they probably wouldn't be negotiating with them for access.

This is what happens during war, both sides look for ways to create pressure on the other to force them to the table. Iran is fighting an uphill battle so needs to turn people against the US by limiting oil shipments, but that doesn't mean the US is just going to let them keep selling their oil.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 128d

Why would the US allow Iran to continue to sell oil while Iran is destroying other ships.

To keep oil prices from rising too high, with whole countries running dry. While GOP will portray it as 100% democrats fault, west coast runs out of jet fuel in a week or so.

Something Iran can do to force GCC to demand an end to war within 10 days is to destroy all desalination infrastructure

No one wants Iran to be able to charge for access to the Strait and this would put pressure on the to find a more agreeable end to the conflict.

It is a legal response to an illegal war. Reparations paid to Iran (normally by US) that US adoring colonies can pay instead would satisfy Iran's revenue generation/compensation rationale.