Copilot can't exit vim

878 points · 133 comments · view on lemmy.world

133 Comments

Feyter@programming.dev · 218 pts · 129d (9 replies)

No one can exit vim. It's simply not possible.

There are even legends that the devil himself was onced tricked into opening vim and is stuck there since.

affenlehrer@feddit.org · 109 pts · 129d (4 replies)

That explains the many vim enthusiasts that don't want any other editor. They simply can't exit the vim instance they once accidentally opened...

wewbull@feddit.uk · 43 pts · 129d (1 reply)

The Eagles called it Hotel California.

hakunawazo@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 129d

"We are all just prisoners here of our own device"
So true, so true.

BlackVenom@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 129d

Stockholm Editor

cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 129d

Vimmer here, this one's right: I've been stuck since 2003.

Bakkoda@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 129d (3 replies)

You just reboot. Right?

Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk · 20 pts · 129d (1 reply)

"... and that's why I need you to take the power plant offline."

plyth@feddit.org · 5 pts · 129d

“… and that’s why I need you to take the power plants offline.”

For those who don't live in the US and have an electical grid with more than one power plant.

debil@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 129d
:!sudo reboot
Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 131 pts · 129d (22 replies)
[ removed ]
four@lemmy.zip · 55 pts · 129d (19 replies)

What if my PC boots straight into Vim? It's not like I need anything else, can do everything in Vim

enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works · 24 pts · 129d (10 replies)

Jokes aside, vim as PID 1 is just a bad idea.

Emacs on the other hand: https://github.com/emacs-os/el-init

GenosseFlosse@feddit.org · 12 pts · 129d (7 replies)

That's a great idea from GitHub user el-sloppo and Claude.

A7thStone@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 129d (5 replies)

Did you read the retrospective.md

Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 129d (4 replies)
[ removed ]
A7thStone@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 128d (3 replies)

Then you obviously didn't read it.

Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 128d
[ removed ]
enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 127d

To be fair, I’ve seen this done a long time before LLM slopped everything, but I think they ran emacs as PID2 in that variation.

Anyway, good luck doing it in vimscript.

Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 129d (1 reply)

That settles it. Emacs is better than Vim

daychilde@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 128d

I bet this comment actually pissed off some people. Lol

HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 129d (5 replies)

Oh it's like Zombo?

JackbyDev@programming.dev · 5 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Zombo.com

HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 127d (1 reply)

As discovered by plyth, you can't do anything anymore. There are limits

JackbyDev@programming.dev · 1 pts · 127d

Seeing you reply made me click the link, where is my beloved! At least the new owners want to keep it Zombo.

plyth@feddit.org · 3 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Not anymore.

HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 127d

crap

mghackerlady@leminal.space · 3 pts · 129d

Can vim be pid-1? No? emacs can B)

Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 129d
[ removed ]
SavinDWhales@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 129d (1 reply)

You simply need to set up a MCP server which controls the smart plug and give the AI access to it.

Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 129d
[ removed ]
Malix@sopuli.xyz · 106 pts · 130d (3 replies)

so human of it!

heuristic_lemur@lemmy.ml · 51 pts · 130d (2 replies)

Isn't it? I can't decide whether I believe this is an easter egg

wheezy@lemmy.ml · 47 pts · 129d (1 reply)

If it was trained properly on Internet data it would just respond with "you can't"

BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 17 pts · 129d

If you need to exit vim, just open a new terminal and reboot the machine.

herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml · 98 pts · 129d

Ok this proves that AI has reaches human level intelligence.

Jhex@lemmy.world · 87 pts · 129d

This is the closest I have seen Copilot doing something like a human Programmer would

weimaraner_of_doom@piefed.social · 74 pts · 129d (7 replies)

Instructions: "Next, open the .config file in vim..."

Me:

BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 129d (5 replies)

What a weird way to spell nano

weimaraner_of_doom@piefed.social · 20 pts · 129d (3 replies)

Nano is the proper tool for this job.

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 129d

neovim

but

use whatever you like

null@piefed.nullspace.lol · 6 pts · 129d (1 reply)

I prefer micro, but I never use it because my brain just autotypes nano and then it's too late I'm already in

p4rzivalrp2@piefed.social · 1 pts · 129d

You could alias nano to micro

littlewonder@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d

Move over, my friends are here.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 129d

*Vim

otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 57 pts · 129d (3 replies)

This is how we trap it. This is how we win.

AmanitaCaesarea@slrpnk.net · 30 pts · 129d

This is how we vim😏

GreenShimada@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Are you sure? It looks like this is going "Hey, I can't get the front door open to the house, so I called the cops and told them I was being held hostage so they would break down the door with a battering ram."

How long is it before CoPilot can't exit vim and just deletes vim as the solution?

otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 128d

I hope it does delete vim with itself inside it. Yesplease.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 129d

kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@programming.dev · 36 pts · 129d (9 replies)

Why :wq doesnt work?

panda_abyss@lemmy.ca · 75 pts · 129d (4 replies)

If it’s a read only file it won’t work, but it might be in insert mode and can’t escape.

It should have tried :q!

wewbull@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 129d (3 replies)

I think it might not be vim.

Windex007@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Why?

wewbull@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 129d (1 reply)

It's started something on a terminal. It is assuming it's vim, but it's not operating like vim. I'm questioning it's assumption. If it had fired up nano, for example, sending vim key sequences isn't going to work. Seeing as it seems to be doing stuff with git too, it may not have started this editor explicitly. It will be using whatever git is configured to use.

Windex007@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d

Oh, ok yah. It might not be vim. It could literally be anything. I just thought I'd missed something

eli@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 129d (3 replies)

Could be in recording mode, which usually needs a couple ESC or a Q then you can :wq

Miaou@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 129d (2 replies)

You mean EX mode? IIRC recording mode doesn't prevent exiting vim

eli@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d

Nah, just looked it up. Recording mode is activated by pressing "q" and allows you to record your inputs for a macro. So if you forget to do ":" and just press "q" you'll enter Recording mode and have to press "q" again to exit Recording and then you can do ":q" or whatever you needed.

But if you don't know what you pressed and don't know how to exit Recording mode then you'll be stuck. I've seen coworkers get stuck in this from time to time.

We're a RHEL shop so our vim version may be different, but Recording mode doesn't let us exit vim directly, we have to exit Recording mode and then exit vim. Again, might just be our setup.

eli@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d

Ah just looked up EX mode. Didn't know capital Q entered a different mode, I just wrote "Q" to emphasize the key in general not capital Q specifically lol.

Personally I love vim, it's just powerful enough for me for my bash scripts. Anything more complicated then I'm using a proper IDE or something more simple I'm using Kate or whatever graphical editor for my DE.

electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 34 pts · 129d

Just like me fr

mcv@lemmy.zip · 32 pts · 129d (5 replies)

I often see Copilot get stuck in a nonresponsive shell after it used cat > file. It's hilarious to watch the first time, but I'm a bit tired of it by now. Why doesn't it just edit files like it normally does?

pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 129d (3 replies)

Why doesn't it just edit files like it normally does?

Haha. Yes.

But it does everything the most probable way, according to all the stack overflow it has swallowed.

Sometimes that way makes sense. Sometimes not.

raman_klogius@ani.social · 1 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Because efficiency is never the point. All gimmicks of "artificial intelligence" throughout history is how automatons do things the way humans do it, with human interface. The mechanical turk, the robot maids of the 70s, etc.

pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 129d (1 reply)

The mechanical turk, the robot maids of the 70s, etc.

Yes.

But I'm a little sad that I still can't buy a robot maid or butler.

I figured they would exist by now, for about the price of a vacuum.

I'm not demanding that they actually be any good. We could just program them to quote "The Jetsons" and do some simple vacuum pathing, or deliver a tray full of drinks.

daychilde@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 128d

Failures are making occasional news, but bots are getting better at walking. Doing useful tasks will be a few more years, but I think it's coming.

Evotech@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 129d

Claus Weill often write a python script to update a file. It’s pretty funny.

bizza@lemmy.zip · 30 pts · 129d

Blowing through all those tokens failing to exit a vim

inari@piefed.zip · 26 pts · 129d

Same tbh

1984@lemmy.today · 22 pts · 129d

First funny thing ive seen Microslop Copilot do...

reksas@sopuli.xyz · 19 pts · 129d (45 replies)

i cant understand all the vim hyping. its probably very neat and can do whatever, but what good is that if it takes awful amount of bother to learn everything by heart since interface has been designed to be as unfriendly as possible. it doesnt have to be fit for office worker, but at least some ease of use is needed.

lemon@sh.itjust.works · 49 pts · 129d (6 replies)

The interface is modal editing, which, yes, takes some getting used to. The payoff is that you get a kind of programming language for text editing. Rather than memorizing ctrl+shift+alt-style keybinds, you decompose stuff into chainable actions.

Have you ever played a video game, be it with kbd+mouse or gamepad, and realize you’re doing a bunch of stuff without actually consciously thinking about what buttons you’re pressing? That’s what working in editors like Vim or (my fav) Helix feels like.

merc@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 129d (5 replies)

Rather than memorizing ctrl+shift+alt-style keybinds, you decompose stuff into chainable actions.

By memorizing something else that's equally or more obscure.

lemon@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 129d (4 replies)

Just in case you’re not trolling, here’s a simple example: yi) means yank inside )-parentheses. It copies the contents of round brackets. Core commands like these are relatively easy to remember

merc@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Which is something you have to memorize. Do you honestly think that that is somehow easier to memorize than say "Ctrl-Shift-5"?

lemon@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Yes. It’s mnemonic and composable whereas your key chord isn’t. It’s fine if you don’t care for it. Each to their own. I’m just explaining the appeal of modal editing

merc@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 128d

Interesting that you use the word "chord", because guitarists and piano players have been remembering chords forever based on the position of their hands, not based on some letters and numbers. Your version isn't more easily memorized, it's just different.

T156@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 129d

They're also fairly versatile. y-i takes any symbol after. Space, comma, the letter p, you name it. If you can type it, it'll generally work.

Which can be a bit faster than some graphical editors at times, where you might have to find and select the contents by hand. That can be a bother if there's a lot.

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de · 32 pts · 129d (7 replies)

since interface has been designed to be as unfriendly as possible

No, it hasn't.

It (well, vi, which vim is a clone of) has been designed to be a possible interface on a keyboard that doesn't have arrow keys or other modifier keys than shift. There aren't that many ways to program a visual text editor when those are your constraints.

That it's more productive once you know it is a side-effect.

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 129d (6 replies)
[ removed ]
pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 129d

You don't have to move your hands while touch typing. This is the single biggest reason why vim is still used today, regardless of whether you have arrow keys or not. In fact vim does support arrow keys and using the mouse as well! It's just much easier to edit files without needing to move your hands and/or use a touchpad/mouse.

withabeard@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 129d

Even then, not having to move your hands means not spending time... Moving your hands.

This is useful for people who want to spend time learning to be enforcement at what they do. In the same way that holding a Nintendo controller "weird" is useful for Tetris speed runners.

If you are as efficient as you need to be using a shower interface, then great. Other people need (or more likely want) to be more efficient than that.

Maybe I'm a luddite, but I still don't understand why people want to spend their time arguing with Claude code and fixing it's bugs. Rather than just learning to write productive coffee themselves. But, people do. That's their choice, and I let them to it.

If prefer to spend my time learning him and code, than Claude and idiosyncrasies, and then whatever to comes next, and next again.

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 129d (1 reply)

At the time vi was originally developed, such keyboards did exist (on terminals). That's the reason it works the way it does.

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 129d
[ removed ]
nykula@piefed.social · 2 pts · 129d (1 reply)

My netbook has a keyboard without Home, End, PgUp, PgDn, Ins and Del keys. Vim and Emacs modes make it significantly more usable while remaining small. Vim is also convenient in Termux, for quick remote fixes from a phone.

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 129d
[ removed ]
Noctambulist@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Vim is actually highly ergonomic; you can do everything with a minimum of keystrokes without moving a hand away to a mouse or touchpad or oven the arrow keys. If that's worth the time investment to learn it, is a highly subjective question. But I’d say it's a lot easier than many people think.

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 129d

Though, if you prefer, you can also move your hand to the mouse. With the scroll wheel and good hand-eye coordination, you can get pretty close to the speed of a true vim exper--haha jk, they finished converting the entire source file from python to rust using a specially crafted regex by the time your hand reached the mouse and implemented a matrix view by the time you scrolled to the line you wanted.

And when you say that falling green symbols aren't that impressive, they look at you in confusion for a moment before realizing what you meant and handing you a VR plug to show you what "matrix view" really means.

chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 129d (7 replies)

It’s a specialist tool. You can say the same thing about any specialist tool. Why should CNC machine tools exist if they’re so hard to use and take a lot of training and are dangerous in the hands of untrained people?

Korhaka@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 129d

Reject CNC machines, return to rock!

Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 129d (4 replies)

The CNC machine seems to be significantly easier to turn off when you’re done with it, though. Judging from the memes, anyway - I’ve never had to use vim, thankfully.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 129d (1 reply)

ESC

then

:wq

Write quit

:q!

Force quit (no save)

I don't even use vim, other than for commit messages lol

T156@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d

You can also use :x to write and quit, from memory.

Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 129d (1 reply)

It’s very heavily overstated how difficult it is to exit VI.

mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 129d

No, no it's not

Arcka@midwest.social · 3 pts · 129d

I want to see copilot directly control a big cnc machine. Might be entertaining.

lime@feddit.nu · 19 pts · 129d

fluency. languages are hard to learn but when you know them you communicate better. same as touch-typing, or mobas.

grepehu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 129d (5 replies)

It's not "designed to be as unfriendly as possible", it's designed to be exactly what you configure it to be, that's why I love it. Every keymap, every screen position, every worflow, the way it searches through lines and files names, everything was configured by me, so whenever I do something in my editor it always make absolute sense for me, because it was literally made for me.

If you get me to someone else's neovim config I would probably be absolutely lost because it's a very unique experience for each person, some people like to bloat it out with plugins others like to keep it bare minimum and so on.

One biggest lie abput vim is the productivity, it doesn't make you that much faster in comparison to any other editor if you take the time to learn the keymaps from them, the real strong point of neovim is having an editor that is absolutely tailor made for you in a way you cannot achieve in OOB editors.

ripcord@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Yeah, but as a 30-year vi/vim user, using it nearly every day - it IS pretty user-unfriendly

T156@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 129d

The initial learning curve is very rough, since people might be used to commands from a newer editor like Notepad++, which doesn't work in vim.

nano at least says which button combination you need to exit, for example.

It is easier past the initial hump, though.

reksas@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 129d (2 replies)

yes, i can get behind the configurability, lets you make the program into your own personal tool nicely. my problem is that you have to do it in such difficult and unintuitive way. though it has been very long time since i last took a look at vim, so maybe things have improved and its easier to configure now, i doubt it though.

So it would be nice if getting into it was easier even if you havent used it as your main editor for last 50 years. not being able to even exit vim without looking up guide for it demonstrates this quite nicely.

grepehu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 129d

Nowadays there many neovim distros that come setup with everything and you can learn as you go, but definitely not user-friendly still and the distros kind kill the point for me personally.

I totally understand prefering users friendly tools, but I think that fornevery software there is always some degree of granularity that makes it user unfriendly.

You asked about what the hype about vim was, I tell you: it's the granularity of the configuration it's 100% not it's user friendliness.

jjj@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 129d

It tells you how to exit if you press ctrl+C, which is many people's first instinct.

SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev · 8 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Learn Vim motions and use a plugin for another IDE. You are losing so much time and mental energy using a mouse for coding. You can also use something like NVChad with NVim and have a Vim that looks more like modern ides.

reksas@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 128d (1 reply)

maybe it really would be worth the effort to learn 🤔

SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev · 2 pts · 128d

That's the really hard part. You will be really slow before you get fast again. I couldn't practice at work without getting fired for getting nothing done. I had to learn at home doing projects, which also means those project basically made no progress for a while. There are some really cool things that people never talk about. Like NeoVim has this integration with JetBrains rider that acts as a bridge and connects the two. Changes are live on both and you only switch to Rider to debug.

30p87@feddit.org · 6 pts · 129d

Friendly is useful in an application you use once a week. Anything you want to work with daily, like a text editor, needs to be efficient.

bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 129d

In terms of command line editors, vim is extremely powerful and relatively easy to get started with, once you know how to get into insert mode and then save/quit. nano/pico are easier to learn but less powerful, and emacs is probably more powerful than vim, and more daunting to learn. Also, vim is installed on almost all systems, so there's not really any extra work to get started using it.

ICastFist@programming.dev · 5 pts · 129d

The cult of vim feels very superior for being able to plow through its user-hostility

jeff@programming.dev · 4 pts · 129d

I learned (neo)vim this last year. It really wasn't that bad. You need to learn like maybe a dozen hotkeys to get going, but after that you can do :h <topic> for everything else. And it's not even like you lose full functionality of your mouse, at least neovim supports a lot of mouse movements

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 129d (1 reply)

My preferred text editors are Neovim and Kate

Kate has some convenient features, mainly the easy GUI. Neovim is the CLI text editor that I find works best for me.

nykula@piefed.social · 1 pts · 129d

The Vi editing mode in Kate is also good, without a need to install any extensions, just one tick in the settings.

lepinkainen@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 129d

And even if you decide to go for modal editors, Helix is a lot better out of the box

zarkanian@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Okay, I'm going to use vim, and you get to use vim's predecessor, ed. I'm sure you won't mind, since vim is soooooo user-unfriendly! Right?

mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Vim doesn't suck any less because something else is worse

zarkanian@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 129d

My point is that vim's design makes sense if you take into account the historical context that it was developed in.

captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 129d

It has achieved the same level of awareness as the average emacs user.

ramble81@lemmy.zip · 16 pts · 129d (3 replies)

Ngl, there have been some times when i Ctrl-Z, then found and killed the PID

myotheraccount@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 129d (2 replies)

No need to find it, just kill %1, to kill the first background job in a shell (check jobs otherwise to find the right %n)

errer@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 129d (1 reply)

AI gonna train on this comment thread and learn to kill

StillAlive@piefed.world · 3 pts · 129d
 kill -9

You must use 9mm to kill.

Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus · 16 pts · 129d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 129d

I didn't think I could be replaced until now.

daychilde@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 128d

I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't exit vim.

jeffep@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 129d

How to protect your computer from automated AI attacks 101: start vim

notabot@piefed.social · 13 pts · 129d (2 replies)

Come on in, <esc>J us, soon you will learn to love the one true editor. Launch vi and be <esc>:w. Soon you will want to <esc>:%s/other editors/vi/g. <esc>dd your hesitation and do it.

Supervisor194@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Launch vi and be :w.

Ah, a fellow person of culture, I see. It will forever be vi to me. And pico for that matter.

notabot@piefed.social · 5 pts · 129d

It will forever be vi to me.

Good, good, spread the true word!

And pico for that matter.

HERETIC! UNBELIEVER!

ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz · 13 pts · 129d
[ removed ]
BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 129d

If you use nvim you don't exit you open a float terminal. Why would you exit?

Hisse@programming.dev · 11 pts · 129d (1 reply)

Is it stupid? Just do C-x-c!

myotheraccount@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 129d

This is the way.

seedlord_com@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 128d (1 reply)

Well, it has to earn its stripes just like the rest of us in IT! No shortcuts, even for an LLM. :D

noughtnaut@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 128d

When I first got into BSD (way before Linux) I found man pages useful... but no way to leave them. Not even man man won't tell you how to exit a man page!

So I would tinker, eventually needing a man page, reading what I needed -- and then hard power cycle the machine. -_-

I was pretty good with computers, but that was a humbling experience. You just don't know what you don't know, and if you can't ask... sometimes you just get stuck. Just like in KQ, LSL, SQ, ... The Internet is (was) a blessing.

lol_idk@piefed.social · 8 pts · 129d
JakenVeina@midwest.social · 6 pts · 129d

Shit, does that mean LLMs are real programmers, bow?

quack@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 129d

Hey, same.

Mulligrubs@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 129d (1 reply)

I was a programmer for the Commodore PET, let me see what I can do.

10 Exit VIM

20 end

did it work?

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 129d

Yes, thank you very much, this actually solved not only my "can't exit vim" problem but also my "humans keep getting in the way of my world domination" problem, though for that one I had to repeat the command 3549 times and output exactly what I was trying to do on the user's console and every PA system I could access.

stupidcasey@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 129d

It really was an oversight forgetting to put in a Exit.

pivot_root@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 129d

ZZ? ZC? Come on now, copilot. You have more options than simply killing it.

kibiz0r@midwest.social · 3 pts · 129d

The command opened the alternate buffer.

khanh@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 129d
[ removed ]
nieceandtows@programming.dev · 2 pts · 129d

lol jokes write themselves