Valve Says The Companies Making RAM Give Them A Price And If They Say No, They ‘Never Talk To Us Again’
https://kotaku.com/valve-says-the-companies-making-ram-give-them-a-price-and-if-they-say-no-they-never-talk-to-us-again-2000709575
677 points · 201 comments · view on lemmy.world
201 Comments
sundray@lemmus.org · 335 pts · 40d
😡
DevDave@piefed.social · 139 pts · 40d
Oh wow, reading the wiki you linked, looks like that one exec really learned their lesson \s
edit/update: Oh, wow so Sun Woo Lee actually really lucked out as Korea focused more on making an example of the Samsung heir apparent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Jae-yong
8 months in prison sucks, I totally concede that. Yet literally the deal they made looks like they were asked "Would you take the fall and go to prison for 8 months and then get paid millions per year afterward?"
Denvil@piefed.world · 115 pts · 40d
Going to jail as a poor person means you lose your job
Going to jail as a rich person apparently gets you a promotion
Interesting
DevDave@piefed.social · 47 pts · 40d
Doesn't the mob and other syndicates do something like that as well? Gotta do some time and not snitch to move up in the ranks.
urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe · 39 pts · 40d
That means that he managed to keep the fine small enough that Samsung made significantly more money off the price fixing than they ever lost from the fine. Hasn’t changed
https://www.axios.com/google-facebook-fines-profits--134d3567-1052-4d9d-aa70-dc7c25ed4ebf.html
AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 40d
Cost of doing business really
BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 39d
Not just lose your job, but your entire career as the prison record will come up in your background check and the news will also be on the internet forever, the prison / slavery industry is a well oiled machine
morto@piefed.social · 7 pts · 40d
"They gave their freedom for this company!" - Some corrupt executive somewhere
jtrek@startrek.website · 54 pts · 40d
None of the fines for these things are enough. It should be, like, the company is nationalized. The leadership is sentenced to years of community service and barred from working in the industry for life.
AHamSandwich@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 39d
Fucking corporate America. I was fired for having a disability, specifically and intentionally by my boss and her manager. Neither has any direct accountability - both were terminated as a result of the findings of a federal and state investigation, but the company will pay for the damages. They both failed upward, getting higher positions at other companies, while I've struggled to find employment, something already difficult due to the stigma of my age, disability, and gender, but now with word of my termination having spread through the quite small pool of people who work in my field.
zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 39d
Uuugh, fuck that! I am so deeply sorry. I'm disabled and of an age and gender that get heavily discriminated against, too...so I feel you. I've been there. It's so awful and makes you feel like shit. I sincerely hope things get better for you ASAP! Here's some Internet hugs, if you want them: 🫂
justaman123@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 40d
Probably only gotta do that once for things to really change
village604@adultswim.fan · 11 pts · 39d
You gotta give a booster shot every once in a while to remind them.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 39d
coupled with the fact that the cartels refuse to expand production; this tells me they're realistic about the moment - it's not going to be a decade of future humongous peak RAM consumption, because otherwise they'd be blisteringly stupid (to lose out on those potential increased sales)... https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/dram/memory-makers-have-no-plans-to-increase-production-despite-crushing-ram-shortages-modest-2026-increase-predicted-as-dram-makers-hedge-their-ai-bets
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 38d
They see the AI bubble for what it is, just like the rest of us, and they don't want to be holding warehouses full of shovels when the gold stops coming.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 38d
entirely agree. if there were overproduction it would cause the prices to crash, can't have that.
ennof@feddit.org · 3 pts · 39d
Micron has been building a new fab in Boise which is set to output RAM starting 2027, no?
https://www.kivitv.com/southeast-boise/everything-you-need-to-know-about-microns-massive-boise-manufacturing-expansion
Apparently another fab is planned already.
https://investors.micron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/micron-announces-groundbreaking-historic-new-york-megafab
Infineon is also looking to expand production, if I understand correctly, though RAM may not be their main thing.
https://www.stern.de/gesellschaft/regional/sachsen/chipindustrie--halbleiterproduktion--infineon-ist--ready--fuer-wachstum-37531970.html
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 39d
yeah this is kind of the pattern with ram price fluctuations.
Ram demand goes up.
Ram prices go up.
Ram makers say they'll increase capacity.
Nothing happens, they may open new factories but close older lines, or they may start to open another fab but then for whatever reason it doesn't work.
Ram prices go up.
ennof@feddit.org · 2 pts · 39d
The decision to build the new Boise fab in question (to start production in 2027) was made in September 2022. ChatGPT was made available to the public in November 2022. The new fab is likely not a response to significantly increased demand at the time but an investment made in expectation of increased demand (GPT-4 could already be tested in 2020, maybe they foresaw the LLM hype). They make DRAM. Isn't it likely that prices are going to drop once production starts at the new fab?
https://investors.micron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/micron-invest-15-billion-new-idaho-fab-bringing-leading-edge
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 38d
Micron Locks In Historically High Memory Prices For Five Years
https://m.slashdot.org/story/455824
ho lee fuggin sheeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiit
Even massive efforts to build new chip fabs aren’t much help, he said, because the increasing complexity of new memory types means it takes longer to build factories – and when they come online there still won’t be enough capacity to build both the high-bandwidth memory needed for AI and other types of NAND and DRAM.
ennof@feddit.org · 3 pts · 38d
Well, shit. So much for that. Is that even legal?
Another source with same info...
https://www.heise.de/en/news/Micron-sets-high-memory-prices-for-5-years-11344834.html
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d
AI should be illegal if this is the consequence. fuuuuUUUUuu
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 39d
depends on the market; one of the things I've seen repeatedly is new fabs opening to produce newer processes - replacing older fabs with larger nodes that then are shut down.
sometimes it's advantageous to keep the old lines going and eek every bit of market share out of them, sometimes it's prohibitive to keep older processes open.
but to respond to your query: in this market? in these crazy times? I'd be striking while the iron is hot and getting the maximum I could from every dram chip because the valuations of the hyperscalers and the surrounding ecosystem - open AI, anthropic, meta, google, nvidia etc., will continue to gobble it up until the bubble blows up in their faces.
kescusay@lemmy.world · 134 pts · 40d
It's related to the AI bubble. The AI companies are trying to make it as difficult as possible to get a good PC, because they know they're cooked if the general public has access to systems that can run AI models locally, so they're buying everything up as fast as they can in the name of data centers that will never be built.
As soon as the first one fails, it's all over. Prices will tumble and memory makers will come crawling back to Valve (and other hardware makers) begging them to buy.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 101 pts · 40d
Let's not forget that almost all memory is made by a cartel of 3 companies known for price fixing. They're all being as slow as possible about increasing production capacity.
Zoot@reddthat.com · 26 pts · 40d
Is that not for good reason though? Only for them really, but if they did ramp up production and then the bubble pops... I wish they would ramp up production, it's just easy to understand why they won't.
BassTurd@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 40d
If there is a demand for ram, which there is in the consumer market, then it shouldn't be a risk. If DCs get cancelled, then they should have contracts in place for at least a minimum buy, which should offset cost risk. If they don't have that, then that's just shitty business. Even still, they can just as easily slow down production if needed. If the bubble pops, either they'll have inventory that the world will buy and they can throttle back prod, or they don't have inventory and they will have to throttle prod anyway since demand for DCs as a whole has to be more than just the consumer market.
Idk, it's probably just the cynic in me, but I think it's likely this is just manipulation of the prices, especially given the history of these companies doing just that.
Johanno@feddit.org · 3 pts · 39d
They definitely have contracts that ensure the ai companies buy the ordered amount.
However building new production factories is expensive as fuck. They know they need to do that. But why buy a factory for billions and sell RAM at a lower price when you just don't spend billions and earn even more with less RAM
Damage@feddit.it · 1 pts · 39d
Because if you don't do everything possible to continuously improve your business, others may catch up with you
Johanno@feddit.org · 5 pts · 39d
Hah. That's the point where a good cartel comes in and ensures that this is not the case.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 38d
I'm sure they're already running their factories at 100% capacity. Ramping up would mean building more factories, and ramping down afterward would mean letting those factories sit unused. That's risky.
shads@lemy.lol · 2 pts · 39d
Once the US economy craters into the recession it should by all rights currently be working through... Oh I am sure at that point there will be all sorts of companies dumping all sorts of things into every market they can to try to survive.
The AI bubble bursting will fuck the world in ways that will take decades to unfuck. If sanity was even slightly fashionable right now governments around the world, especially the US would be using every power they had to put some limits on this whole mess. Regulation, taxation, environmental controls everything would be on the table.
Instead we seem to be racing at the wall as fast as we can with NVidia and co in the driving seat, and governments around the world in the passenger seat screaming "Go! Go! Go!"
That's OK though, economic turmoil is felt by the individual based on their starting wealth. The rich often manage to become wealthier, it's the poor who get buried. Yay capitalism.
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social · 1 pts · 38d
This is a wild theory if I ever heard one
kescusay@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d
I mean, it seems pretty obvious at this point. The data centers aren't getting built in time for all the hardware they're buying up to get used, so it's just sitting in warehouses and will be obsolete by the time any of these new data centers are built (if they ever actually are). And Jensen Huang has been waxing poetic about a future in which people don't own computers anymore, they rent them to run AI agents on.
I'm not saying this is a sane and rational thing they're pursuing, and it's certainly doomed to failure because no one wants to rent computer time to run AI agents. But trying to prop up the AI bubble certainly seems to be the primary goal of all this ridiculous hardware purchasing.
Mac@mander.xyz · -18 pts · 40d
Yep. Just like how nobody uses Windows since Linux is easily accessible.
Wait
kescusay@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 40d
What are you talking about?
Mac@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 40d
The general public adopting open tech themselves instead of using corporate options
Was that not clear?
dragonlover@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 39d
It's not the average consumer spending thousands on tokens. Even my work just had a meeting about how "the free lunch is over" now that AI costs are expanding, and they bought their own hardware to investigate hosting local models.
Linux is widely used in the enterprise world. It's the home consumer world that doesn't use it as much and even that is rapidly changing as things enshitify.
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social · 1 pts · 38d
That's going to be incredibly hard to make economical I bet, unless you have the ability to basically max out the utilization of the hardware around the clock.
Mac@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 39d
otter@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 40d
Having an option vs not having an option
Also Linux and Windows are pretty different in use cases and capabilities. Meanwhile, local AI models have a very similar user experience. If hardware was cheaper and people could run better LLMs locally, they wouldn't pay monthly for it.
Mac@mander.xyz · -7 pts · 40d
You're right, the general public doesn't use Linux due to the lack of ability to browse the web and file their taxes—Windows exclusive functionality.
otter@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 40d
In the workplace, there are still a lot of domain specific programs that don't have Linux support. Companies don't have much of an incentive to port that stuff over. As for the people who just need a web browser, they probably would use Linux just fine if they could buy a computer at BestBuy that comes with Linux preinstalled
Compare that to LLM programs, where it's a matter of "download this app instead of that one, because this one is free and that one costs $25 a month"
hark@lemmy.world · 78 pts · 39d
I hope China floods the market with cheap RAM and absolutely destroys these scumbag memory companies.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 22 pts · 39d
Like they did with EVs in the US?
Republicans would probably make sure that can't happen.
Taleya@aussie.zone · 24 pts · 39d
And you end up with the US getting hosed while the rest of us swim in cheap EVs.
Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 pts · 39d
The US would be the only country to suffer in this scenario. The rest of the world would be just fine with using cheaper memory while we shoot ourselves in the foot to spite them.
hark@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 39d
I'm sure they'll try to ban Chinese memory for "national security reasons" but the differences here are that memory is much easier to smuggle in, and even if not, them flooding other markets would free up more supply of other manufacturers enough that we should see major price drops anyway. They recently tried banning imports of foreign-made routers and that didn't seem to actually work out.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 38d
I can't wait to buy hollow lead cubes for recreational purposes. No, they don't open, why do you ask?
mlg@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 39d
They already preemptively had CXMT on the trade blacklist lol. Only got removed because of the intense shortage.
luipaard0011@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 39d
don’t worry I can import an euro car bloated with chinese rams everywhere. a win-win
TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 39d
It will take maybe two to three years before China could do that. The cheap Chinese RAM manufacturers are only starting their production.
hark@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 39d
That's true, but after that point the capacity is there and it will be harder to constrain supply in this way after that. After China establishes a major memory player, I assume they wouldn't want to fall behind after that point either.
echodot@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 39d
If they have the capacity to do that they would have already been doing it. Chip production is extremely expensive which is why there's only a few companies doing it.
Tattorack@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 39d
Fingers crossed for the next 5 years.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 54 pts · 40d
Valve: "May we buy some RAM, good sir?"
RAM Companies: "Sure. How much you willing to pay?"
Valve: "$30?"
RAM Companies: laugh "Get the fuck outta here, loser!"
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 45 pts · 40d
So maybe try to remember that after the AI bubble burst, and there is more RAM than customers, and it's the customer that sets the price.
SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org · 36 pts · 40d
I'm starting to think more and more that the only way to pop the bubble is the Luigi Style.
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 40d
This is crazy... But it's true.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 39d
Knowing Sam Altman, he might have a plateu of plans to keep the bubble from bursting. Him going will mean the bubble will have one week at top.
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social · 1 pts · 38d
It's not really a bubble if you have to shoot someone pop it
wewbull@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 39d
I think that would feed the hype machine.
Sxan@piefed.zip · -2 pts · 40d
But... þere are still so many insurance executives in þe queue.
Prior_Industry@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 39d
Can't wait to see how negotiations go once the AI bubble pops
betanumerus@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 39d
Their dilemma is whether to build more RAM factories, which would reduce prices, or not. Knowing when demand slows down would surely help them.
keyez@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 39d
They'll just continue with artificial scarcity until they get sued or fined or something but won't be enough to offset the profits
blarth@thelemmy.club · -8 pts · 38d
AI is not a bubble and will not pop.
Prior_Industry@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 38d
It's interesting seeing how AI companies are now changing their pricing models, altering feature sets or amounts of tokens available. Looks to me like the realities of the cost to provide AI to the end user is catching up with them. Once they paywall the free features, I can certainly see it becoming a more niche product that fewer will pay to use for a specific task rather than just a Google replacement.
Once the growth projections get revised, look out below! That these companies are desperate to IPO rather than private equity sitting on an ever increasing asset seems like a red flag to me also.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 38d
Are you sure about that?
Jaysyn@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 38d
You're incorrect and here are some explanations why.
https://www.wheresyoured.at/brokenomics/
https://www.wheresyoured.at/exclusive-openai-financials/
Bongles@lemmy.zip · 30 pts · 39d
I know it'd be expensive, but I wonder if it'd be worth it to valve to start producing ram. They've certainly got the money to get it started, they are getting heavy into hardware that they can use it in, and they could sell it as well.
I don't know if there's a shortage of raw material or if no one wanted to invest in more manufacturing when AI could crash within a short time.
magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 27 pts · 39d
Manufacturing their own sticks would onlympush the problem to the price of RAM chips.
The resources it takes to start manufacturing modern RAM chips is such that THE ENTIRE FUCKING NATION OF CHINA is finally getting around to it.
I know Valve is a big company, but that's a pretty bite to chew and swallow.
Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 39d
My undiagnosed adhd brain: how difficult can in be
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 39d
The actual process of creating semiconductors is basically:
In recent years, step 3 has gotten so complicated, based on needing to create radiation of exactly a particular wavelength of extreme ultraviolet light focused exactly on the silicon (and the mask/stencil above it), because that wavelength allows for the smallest possible features on the silicon. So they take purified tin, melt the tin into molten liquid, and ejecting the molten tin in a liquid jet downward into a vacuum at exactly the right speed to where it forms into droplets of the exact size for the machine (about 50 μm), then blasts each droplet, mid-fall, with a 1.6kW laser that heats it up so hot that it vaporizes and ionizes into plasma at the exact position where a system of highly polished and precisely positioned mirrors focuses the UV radiation evenly onto the silicon surface.
Oh, and the machine makes one tin droplet every 1/50,000 of a second, so in any given second it ionizes 50,000 droplets in the stream.
The machine costs something like $300 million, and requires full time experts to make sure that it's working correctly.
Everything else in the fabrication facility is similarly complicated, which is why a fab represents something like $30 billion in total costs over its lifetime.
kossa@feddit.org · 5 pts · 38d
Joke's on them with their fancy techno-babble. I'll build my own memory
I am on 5 mm technology already, how hard can it be to get smol?
ryphez@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 38d
That’s freaking crazy
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 39d
Now is the time to do it for anyone that can. So much market share available to whoever gets there first.
Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 3 pts · 39d
Even Tsmc tried to make memory and failed. It's difficult.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 38d
Buying chips from CXMT and manufacturing the sticks is likely to be a solid business for someone. No idea if Valve wants to be the ones doing it, though.
Canconda@lemmy.ca · 26 pts · 39d
In a nutshell this is impossible because of how the global supply chain works. Specifically how most of the hardware engineers/factories are in Taiwan, and how the technology to make chips is proprietarily owned by a company in Norway.
Like the whole reason China wants Tiawan in the first place is the same reason they can't just bomb them into submission... Their population of highly skilled hardware engineers that fundamentally make the global chips supply chain possible is impossible to replace.
Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 39d
And China also can't really invade because all the facilities that make the silicon are rigged to self destruct if China puts boots on their soil, at least last I heard.
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 38d
Would be brilliant
Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 38d
I mean, it would bring global tech to a standstill. It would be a significant problem. Once existing stuff broke, there would be no replacement. I know very little about chip manufacture, except that the lithography machines are fantastically complex and costly. It would probably take years to spin up new production.
This seems like a pretty solid mutually assured destruction deterrent and doesn't even involve nukes.
Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 38d
You have clearly and concisely explained the exact reason the US wouldn't and couldn't allow China to invade Taiwan (well, wouldn't under a rational administration).
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 38d
From what I can find, it looks like ASML has a software brick they can just drop into the update stream. As cool as physical disabling would be, a remote software trigger is simpler and leaves the machines in tact to spin back up after aggression ends
Canconda@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 38d
It's a lot of things. But complex tech can involve literally thousands of hardware engineers. Each with very specific skills.
The proximity of these highly skilled workers to cheap chinese labour is another reason why this is difficult to replicate elsewhere.
9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 39d
AsmL is a dutch company...
Also ,i'm not sure if HBM requires the smallest nodes
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 38d
There's a reason why there's only, like, three RAM manufacturers. It's horrifically expensive to start production.
greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo · 1 pts · 37d
Currently the spot price for dram is massively high. Theres so so much profit right now.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 39d
They'd need to source the components outside of the increasingly monopolistic US-alligned group of hardware manufacturers. The only way you end run the Big Three is to go to... CHINA. And we've layered so many sanctions, tariffs, and putative measures on import of Chinese hardware that it would be a fool's errand to bother.
Even if there's an AI crash, the long-term outlook for chip demand only goes up. The problem isn't with the economic demand, it's with the provisioning of capital. For the most part, you need to spend tens - if not hundreds - of billions of dollars to start producing even the middle tier of nano-computing components in modern use.
I might suggest there's another way to tackle this problem. And it's one that Valve already is heavily invested in.
Lower resolution games. Lower hardware requirements. More efficient software engines. More games focused on the mechanics and story than the raw, realistic visuals.
You can run Doom on a pregnancy test and people still buy that game. Games like "Undertale" and "Vampire Survivors" do incredibly well in part because they are so accessible to anyone with a 15-year-old rig. Rather than trying to build a PS5-killer machine, you can go the Nintendo route and build a novel interface that runs on more basic components. Then you exploit the hell out of your Disney-esque IP without worrying that Halo: Remastered Delux Ultra looks better than the next iteration of Metroid Prime.
ID10T@programming.dev · 8 pts · 39d
My understanding is that it’s the latter. AFAIK it takes something like 3-5 years to get a fab going if you already know what you’re doing, so it would not only be wildly expensive but you’re also gambling that RAM won’t come back down to a reasonable supply/demand in the next 5-10 years to break even on the whole process.
There’s also the fact that it wouldn’t really make sense for Valve unless they wanted to make a huge pivot in their whole business. Entry costs aside, manufacturing RAM is not really something a company can just do as a “side gig”. Valve is only like 400 people, so it wouldn’t be Valve just “starting to produce RAM” but rather Valve turning itself into a RAM manufacturer that also distributes video games.
Bongles@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 39d
You know i always forget how small valve actually is.
dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 38d
Chips. Where are they made? Right now its in Taiwan. Wafers for these chips are the most expensive part and that requires special factories and incredibly expensive engineers.
Valve cant just make chipa, they have to make it in quantities to satisfy demand while justifying upstart costs.
Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 38d
Yeah, you have to make much more than you need and sell the excess to keep per unit costs down. At that point you're a chip manufacturer. I'm not sure even valve could afford the startup costs involved.
Diurnambule@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 39d
No need, others vountries ram are emerging. Hope they start to get to techno. Even better if they copied it from US. I think they are at reliable ddr4, testing ddr5.
renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net · 26 pts · 40d
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 38d
Thats how you know you are dealing with a cartel.
Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 38d
Yeah, kinda shows there's zero competition in the market.
ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 19 pts · 39d
I think legacy american market ram companies need to be blacklisted.
Once China floods the market, we need to put these fuckers out of business.
Burninator05@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 39d
There is only one American memory company: Micron. Sk Hynix and Samsung are South Korean.
Everyone else who sells memory modules in the west gets the actual memory chips from one of those three companies. Beyond that there is only one company that makes the waifers that the chips are made from and I think its Dutch. Definitely European.
TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 39d
I think the wafer is dominated by the Japanese. The Dutch company you are thinking of is ASML and they manufacture 90% of the precision machines that manufacture chips in the world.
ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 39d
Is that what I said?
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 39d
Ah yes, the law of greed and demand.
Adderbox76@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 39d
What's to stop them from just going a generation back and using DDR4 instead of DDR5.
There is no one who can convince me that it makes any noticeable difference anyway. When I was putting together a new/used desktop I specifically looked for DDR4 for precisely that reason and I would take any bet that a performance hit would be measured in numbers too small for any user to even notice.
Constantly needing newer hardware with only fractional improvements is the biggest scam in tech. They took their lesson from Apple and Samsung.
festus@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 39d
I don't think DDR4 is significantly cheaper. Plus, they would have had to go a CPU generation back too then and I think the AMD CPUs of that generation had way worse integrated graphics, so now you'd need a dedicated GPU as well.
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 38d
I haven't been following the Steam Machine, but are they using integrated graphics for it?
3bygone3@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d
Nah, it's some kind of a mobile GPU.
qaeta@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 38d
Looks like a custom GPU configuration based on AMD hardware to me. So not an iGPU, but also not a mainline card.
NENathaniel@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 39d
DDR4 isn’t much cheaper, and wouldn’t stay cheaper at all if demand spiked.
jmill@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 39d
DDR4 prices have come up too. In fact, DDR3 and even DDR2 prices have spiked.
Venator@lemmy.nz · 9 pts · 39d
They should also sell it with empty ram slots...
I'm sure a lot of people have a desktop with more ram than it needs that wouldn't mind sacrificing a stick or two for a steam machine in thier lounge, especially of they've switched over from windows 10 to Linux on their desktop...
garretble@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 39d
Depending on your steam machine you get, it might have empty slots. I think one of the interviews said some will have a single stick of 16 and some two sticks of 8 just because the stock for RAM is so dumb they are taking what they can get.
Venator@lemmy.nz · 5 pts · 39d
I mean sell it with 0 sticks, but I also just realized it uses SODIMM DDR5, and I don't think many people have that just lying around 😅
qaeta@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 38d
Geeze, I hope not. 2x8 is a huge difference from 1x16.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 39d
I feel like Valve would have been better off designing a new motherboard and discrete GPU design to facilitate cooling and smaller cases.
Make a new standard and allow any third party to use it.
They just wanted to make a new GameCube instead.
roofuskit@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 39d
Yeah, because everyone agrees the price is too low and more engineering and manufacturing costs are needed to beef it up.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · -4 pts · 39d
I’m talking about something that is closer to a true PC ecosystem than the locked-in underpowered overpriced DOA system.
If the price is going to be exorbitant the system might as well be customizable and not limited to AMD’s trash bin.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 39d
I'm curious what miniature graphics card were you thinking to put in
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 39d
You’re asking me to create the design? I’m not an engineer.
I can tell you that PCs are generally a mess and are definitely limited by standards set decades ago.
That’s what Valve should be doing instead of making a $1000 PS4.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 39d
yeah, so the hardware does not exist yet. but valve is not AMD either, I doubt they have the money (yes) or the expertise to effectively become a graphics card manufacturer. probably they would have to come up with their own data and power sockets, and then it wouldn't be compatible with anything else, maybe a steam machine 2
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 39d
It wouldn’t be compatible with anything else? Like the current overpriced and underpowered hardware which they designed themselves?
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 38d
yes it wouldn't be compatible with anything else, but you would be even more angry because the research and manufacturing costs would make it even more expensive.
complain to micron and openai about the price, not valve. they can't do anything.
SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev · 2 pts · 39d
That article is confusing, are they talking about the RAM chips themselves? Or the packaging(sticks)? Or both? Also without an ad blocker on a phone, that article is herpes. Why would anyone voluntarily read an article from that site.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 37d
There should be a “no RAM, no storage” option.
Valve managed to make a system that can possibly outperform a PS4 for $1050 plus tax plus whatever a controller costs.
The PS4 can also play DVDs, Blu-ray’s and comes with a controller.
greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo · 0 pts · 37d
Who the fuck has physical media in 2026? I have vinyl records, but no CDs, DVDs or BluRay.. Fundimentally its a little linux system, so a USB bluray drive off amazon should just work.
But yes, a ram and diskless version would be nice.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 37d
You don’t have to know the people that have physical media to know that it is valuable.
It just gives the old console even more value. It’s a 1080p system with a massive library of great games at dirt cheap prices.
I don’t know how Valve could have dropped the ball any worse.
greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo · 1 pts · 36d
If it had an optical drive I wouldn't be buying it.
Straight up a waste of space and plastic and componentry.
Its not 2010 any more, DVDs are gone bro.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 36d
I don’t think you’re gonna buy the Steam Machine even without an optical drive.
PS4 Pro is $210 on Amazon. With an optical drive that lets you borrow games. Rent games from a public library. Buy used games. In addition to movies and Blu-ray’s that are much higher quality than any streaming service unless you have worthless eyes and are some kind of child that thinks that time passing makes things inferior.
greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo · 0 pts · 36d
It might be $210 bucks but I already have like 8k worth of games on Steam. Also, I wouldn't buy a PS4 I'd just look in a landfill for a free one.
There are no games on playstation, by comparison.
I don't buy optical media because I just steal 4k footage and watch it on a 4k panel that a PS4 can't drive.
I don't know why you're bothering to argue with me, unless you're some sort of timetraveller from 2016. In which case, theres a terrible pandemic coming in about 4 years time. You should invest in face masks.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 36d
You’re the one butthurt that people still use physical media and that an old console is a much better deal than Valve’s e-waste.
You seem like the type of person that has many friends so I’m gonna let you go back to them. Go ahead and add another downvote to this message. You’re a true redditor.
greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo · 0 pts · 36d
No, I'm just annoyed that you're spouting bollocks at me and haven't stopped.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -7 pts · 39d
If you disagree on valve share in publishing a game on steam it would pretty much be the same story. Valve is a for profit corporation whos ceo own an entire fleet of mega yachts, they are just as shit as any other corporation.
echodot@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 39d
I can always just not publish on Steam. There are other options.
What's happening here with RAM is a cartel
mushroommunk@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 39d
I seriously don't get this constant "Valve is a monopoly, end them" bull crap. Yes they're a business. Yes they make money. Sure they've got flaws we should tackle. But they aren't out there trying to shut itch.io down or using legislation to stop you from hosting the game yourself. GOG and Epic aren't as popular because they don't provide a strong enough product to pull people away.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -1 pts · 38d
You are on lemmy, perhaps understanding how this place work can help you figure out how much shit corporations like valve are. https://join-lemmy.org/docs/index.html
mushroommunk@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 38d
I literally said they have flaws. Calling them a monopoly is as pointless as your rebuttal and shows a complete lack of critical thinking. Call them out for the actual issues, not made up nonsense. Call them out for their inconsistent content moderation, call them out for their lootboxes, call them out for their caving to payment processors. Just don't call them out for the thing they aren't.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 38d
The same way you can publish on a different platform that really few people know about, you can use a different architecture or different ram nobody knows about.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · -12 pts · 39d
It's hard to believe that it's just a RAM issue.
Valve is going full Apple with the SSD upgrade. They're making a healthy profit from each system they sell.
Croquette@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 39d
It's both RAM and storage price. A 2TB NVMe cost upward of 300$ CAD.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · -9 pts · 39d
Did you for get that when they upgrade the storage to 2TB they do not also include the 512GB storage included in the low end model?
DillDough@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 39d
Could be said for literally every single product ever made, come back to reality, holy fucking shit dude.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · -4 pts · 39d
Valve is making a bad deal worse. By being needlessly greedy.
I am in the reality where all the other gaming consoles massively outperform it while costing hundreds less and also providing a controller.
Croquette@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 39d
Do you have any experience in product development? They went through a design process and unfortunately for them, when came time to choose a storage and RAM solution, they had to do it through the current price crisis.
So they either had to table the design and lose their development money or go through with it with the current storage and RAM cost.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 39d
Does it matter if I have experience in product development? Do you?
A product has to justify its cost. This one does not.
You can DIY or buy a pre-built that massively outperforms Valve’s console.
Croquette@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 39d
Yes I do have experience, in fact it's core to my job.
The cost to design is significant and wasting a few years of development is not a light decision. So Valve either had to scrap the design and waste the development cost, or price it according to the current PC parts prices
You are right that people can DIY, but it always was an option and people still buy ready-made computers, so that's a moot point.
The price for comparable parts and same form factor isn't far off from DIY.
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 39d
Why shouldn't they? Margins are going to be tight btw, so they're really not. What they're really selling is a vehicle for Steam.
BTW, try putting together a same or better spec build yourself and get back to us with the cost.
JargonWagon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 39d
They're also trying to make Steam OS available to install on any PC, so any argument of "AlL tHeY tHiNk AbOuT iS pRoFiTs" goes out the door there. I think the only struggle right now is getting it to work with NVidia graphics cards or something.
GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 39d
You can easily make a better pc for cheaper. Plenty of reviews showed this.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 39d
For like $50-$100 cheaper. And they all ignored the small form factor which could easily cost that.
GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d
The small form factor isn’t really a big thing people care about. It definitely doesn’t outweigh it being outdated, underpowered, and forever stuck at that power level.
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 39d
You can build and buy a pre-built PC that easily outperforms the Steam console.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 39d
that does not make sense. you are not building a pre-built, because then its not a pre-built. is the sky cloudy over there?
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 39d
I meant that pre-built or DIY are both better deals. I realize now that I should have been more clear.
This Steam console is bad when discussing performance and value. It has a nice design.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 39d
oh, yes that makes sense
rafoix@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 39d
I really feel like Valve spend a bunch of R&D to make something that doesn’t fix any issues with PC gaming.
It’s noticeably less powerful than comparably priced PCs
It’s noticeably less powerful than consoles costing hundreds of dollars less
It doesn’t come with a controller.
It is not customizable in any meaningful way. 
 This feels like a valves version of the Wii U. Neat hardware, but ultimately underpowered and overpriced with little to no way to lower the cost.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -3 pts · 39d
Because they are a for profit company with a billionaire ceo. Making profits it's their job.
The price you pay for something in a store is not the same price valve pays for a stock of parts. They buy the same stuff for a lot cheaper and resell it at an higher price to make profits.
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · -76 pts · 39d
No Gabe, you fucked up with these price hikes. Don't blame the supplier.
ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip · 32 pts · 39d
Are you...stupid?
Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 39d
Yes.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -7 pts · 39d
Valve and its ceo decides the price of their products. Considering valve is a corporation making billions and the ceo owns an entire fleet of mega yachts, arguing that they are directly to blame for the high prices doesn't sound stupid at all to me. If they are literally swimming in billions their profit cut is high.
ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 39d
Really? The cost of components getting jacked by a supplier is their fault?
If you really are going to make that claim, you simultaneously lose all credibility by admitting that you are literally arguing in bad faith.
Shut the fuck up.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -1 pts · 38d
They jack their own prices to begin with, valve is a for profit company making billions, their faith is making profits.
ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 38d
Wow. They're guilty of.. (checks notes).. being in business.
Shut up
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 37d
Don't rant about prices being high then
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 39d
The ram in the system went from 200 dollars to 600 dollars. Not increasing the price of the console by 400 dollars would have meant scrapping it instead.
There is literally no choice, the ram would have been sold either way, just to someone else instead.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 39d
....in the universe you live in, is there cheap ram?
can I send you money for some please?
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -6 pts · 39d
Private yachts aren't cheap either. To buy an entire fleet of these you need to boost your profits as high as you can.
wewbull@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 39d
So they should fund your gaming habit?
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 38d
Who's funding your chattering on lemmy?
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 39d
Yeah that's annoying and all, but it doesn't fundamentally change how capitalism works.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 39d
so gabe fucked it up by buying a yacht years ago, when ram was cheap, somehow boosting up 'profit' on this margin machine?
my god you're fucking silly
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 38d
He owns multiple mega yachts, he added a 500 millions one to his fleet last year.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d
man I wish you'd gone out with the rest of the dinosaurs, this conversation is extinct.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 38d
and you really think this matters in regards to the ram crisis.
wow, man, whatever you're smoking you should share
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 37d
You sound quite salty, are you in love with the billionare?
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 37d
nah just reality. billionaires suck, but you seem to suck even more somehow. impressive.
muzzle@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 39d
The component price changed, what was Gabe supposed to do, start manufacturing its own RAM?
Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 39d
That would be amazing timeline
ennof@feddit.org · 2 pts · 39d
Dreaming about Pipe RAM by Valve.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · -4 pts · 39d
They are swimming in billions, they could easily lower the profits they make and give it away for cheaper but that's not their goal.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 39d
What do you think the margins are on this thing? You know how much the components cost, it's not hard to figure out about how much it costs them.
Profit margins on consoles are razor thin already, and that's before the skyrocketing price of components.
I'm sorry if that means your mom can't afford to get it for your birthday now, but it is what it is unfortunately.
shads@lemy.lol · 2 pts · 39d
Its worse than that, if they were to do a Microsoft or Sony and sell it at a loss to try and make money back on the games, then what would happen when they sell through the batch they currently have of presumably pre "BiBi and Donnys special visit to Iran" costed units, then what?
Suddenly all the other components are spiking in price, the pcbs and the plastic cost more, the packaging is more expensive, and they are forced to raise their prices. The sound of screeching from the terminally online intensifies as a bunch of "experts" declare that Valve can afford to lose money because Gabe isn't walking around in a barrel Diogenes style.
As a software company in the hardware industry Valve are a lot further down the chain than the bigger names, they aren't securing super long term contracts with anyone. They don't dictate terms. I doubt they are making a ton of money on any of their hardware, they are just trying to nudge the market in the right direction. We are going to see so many knock off steam machines in the next few years, Microsoft will keep releasing targetted versions of Windows to try to smother SteamOS, its a great time for the rest of the gaming ecosystem while AI fucks the hardware side.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 38d
Considering their ceo bought a 500 millions dollars yatch last year to add to his fleet of mega yatches i believe their margins are super high. A corporation doesn't pay for components the same amount you pay from a retailer.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 38d
So Gabe made the Steam Machine with super high margins, sold out, and then went back in time to buy a yacht last year?
You do realize that they just started selling this device, so any wealth he may have had last year is completely unrelated.
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 38d
by now they have been selling hardware for a decade
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 38d
And the Steam Deck was widely reported to have razor thin (if not negative) margins.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 39d
Yep. You are owed everything, after all. You deserve it.
LostCarcosan@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 39d
I'm sorry, do you have any awareness of the world past your nose?
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 39d
He really shouldn't have dumped trillions of private and public money into AI. Thanks Gabe /s