Question: Is there a Self Hosted Discord like app?

Pretty much what it says on the tin, but for more context. My friends and I use Discord to play D&D and other TTRPGs. We also use it to send memes and just have conversations. We mostly do the chat, text, images, gifs, etc. But we also use the voice and video chat pretty regularly too. Screen share sometimes as well. So I'd like to try to find something that has all those features if possible.

The new ID or facial recognition requirement they are implementing is a deal breaker for a few of us, and so if I can set up some kind of alternative to make it a non-issue, I'd like to.

I'm running Ubunutu 22.04 LETS, AMD 3700X, 64GBRAM, 10x 6TB HDD, and and 2 4TB NVmE. Have a 2gb up/down internet connection. So I don't think we should have any issues making it work smoothly for 7 people.

320 points · 170 comments · view on lemmy.world

170 Comments

greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org · 121 pts · 183d (11 replies)

The main issue is you'll never get the cretins that use it off it. Communities.. they're just sitting there burning the library of alexandria.. all the esoteric knowledge they're "putting on discord" is just gonna vanish.

over a billion in vc funding and discord is as shit as it is.

xvertigox@lemmy.world · 57 pts · 183d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Are there any groups we can join as archivist / hoarders?

xvertigox@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 182d
[ removed ]
Cethin@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 183d (2 replies)

It's funny you mention the VC funding. As far as I can tell, it's only made it worse. Discord would have done great if they just kept expectations low. Instead, they're now expected to create massive returns. That must come at the cost of consumers. I hope consumers get tired of it and leave, or someone else comes offering the simple service Discord used to provide.

greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 176d

Mmhmm, its also not early round funding so.. where are they gonna get 3bn to pay back their investors? Or even break even at 1bn?

Limerance@piefed.social · 2 pts · 182d

Yes, enshittification of Discord has started a while ago, and it’s becoming worse.

Tikiporch@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Is it worth preserving though?

howrar@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 183d

So much tech support has moved to Discord. That's worth keeping around.

Limerance@piefed.social · -2 pts · 182d (2 replies)

Call them cretins all you want, Discord in a great piece of software and very powerful. The usability is better than most others.

greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 176d (1 reply)

Its a usability and information discoverability is a nightmare and its continuously probing my system in ways that I don't want it to.

The usability is complete and total ass unless you've grown up knowing no better.

Edit: Also, its full of toxic ass communities with stupid little kingdoms they've set up.

Limerance@piefed.social · 1 pts · 174d

All valid points. It is still popular.

toxic kingdoms

Exist here too.

BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world · 65 pts · 183d (10 replies)
[ removed ]
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 23 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Can confirm, I host Matrix (homeserver synapse) and Element. Voice is a pain to get set up but I hear there are other matrix services which will do this for you easier. It's a process though. You can get text chat up in a day, voice is going to be a bit after that, a lot of tinkering.

Bahnd@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 183d (2 replies)

Dito (Synapse server), Element for desktop app and fruitphones, Shildichat for android (its lighter and has an adorable turtle as a mascot).

And seconding the voice coms, the VOIP relay server is a huge pain to set up, same with the registration page. My nerd herd hosts a few services that federated to share services and the admin group just issues people accounts.

TLDR: no... Were not using discord anymore, we have discord at home.

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 2 pts · 183d

nerd herd

I understood that reference!

I've heard positive things about Dito, if I was doing it over again I think I'd start there

Fmstrat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 182d

Hello Chuck.

icosahedron@ttrpg.network · 21 pts · 183d (4 replies)

yes i second matrix. it's different from discord in a lot of ways, but it's still a pretty seamless transition. for anyone who wants to host matrix, i recommend the continuwuity homeserver software. it's much easier to host than synapse and is significantly faster for 99% of use cases

if you're just trying use matrix, i prefer cinny over element for the client. cinny's ui is also very similar to discord's and it handles space/room grouping very intuitively. there's also fluffychat (less feature rich) and schildichat (element fork), among others. however, element is currently the only client which fully supports voice chat

for instances, i recommend choosing something other than matrix.org. right now, matrix is barely decentralized because the vast majority of users choose matrix.org, which isn't great. also matrix.org collects a lot of data and requires more information to register than most servers. some other good public instances are:

  • tchncs.de
  • unredacted.org
  • catgirl.cloud
  • calitabby.net

there are also many, many smaller public instances, but it's probably better to choose a relatively big one for moderation reasons. a lot of people think matrix is dead or no one uses it, but there are plenty of active communities if you know where to look

for your friends who refuse to quit discord for some reason, matrix's ecosystem also has lots of bridges. if you're willing to self host, i recommend out of your element. the only caveat is that it doesn't support e2ee rooms

riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 183d

This is fantastic information, thank you

BruisedMoose@piefed.social · 1 pts · 181d

My project for the week is getting Matrix and Continuwuity set up. Half-hearted initial attempts have been unsuccessful with the Continuwuity container just in constant restarts.

Hazematman@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

If OP wants voice and video chat like they say they'd have to host synapse and use element afaik.i don't think any of the other home servers support matrix calling. Cinny and fluffychat don't support voice or video calls. Fluffychat has it as an "option" but it's currently broken last time I tried it. Schildi chat might work for voice and video since it's an element fork. I've not tried it so I don't know for sure.

icosahedron@ttrpg.network · 6 pts · 183d

element call is a standalone service (call.element.io) that the client just integrates really well. since it's not actually part of the homeserver deployment, it should work fine even without synapse. that said, it means traffic passes through a third party server unless element call and the client are also self hosted. but yes, you're right that other clients currently do not support calling. luckily, cinny is relatively close to merging a PR that adds it

Limerance@piefed.social · 1 pts · 182d

Not bad is a good description. It’s not fun to use compared to other chat software.

TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 39 pts · 182d (3 replies)

I‘ve been looking into this a bit and whilst i haven’t really tried any of the alternatives, i did collect some notes:

possible contenders

  • zulip
    • apache-2.0 self hosted more work focussed
  • stoatchat (formerly revolt)
    • AGPL-3 self hosted
  • teamspeak
    • proprietary ... self hosted older ts3 with ts6 announced
  • mumble
    • license seems foss - self hosted
  • spacebar
    • AGPL-3 self hosted
  • return to irc or xmpp

probably no

  • matrix - could not decryptinator
    • a hassle regarding voice
  • peersuite

DO NOT

  • mattermost
    • play stupid games, win stupid prices
  • guilded
    • owned by roblox
  • slack
  • discord
  • ventrilo
    • proprietary - not selfhosted - no linux

please let me know what y’all think

dude@lemmings.world · 11 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Most of the possible contenders lack video calls and some also other needs mentioned by the OP. Nextcloud Talk has them all

TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 182d

oooh, true, i forgot to included them on the list. thanks for the reminder!

Snowdrop9144@anarchist.nexus · 4 pts · 182d

Excellent summary

ollie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 38 pts · 183d (6 replies)

matrix is unreasonably hard to set-up, why doesnt the docker container or the compose include voice chat? i cant even sign up for stoat to try it out.. is this the best we have against discord in the big 26 😭

carrylex@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 183d

Voice chat works out of the box with Matrix.

It uses WebRTC and tries to do P2P connections. Note that this leaks your IP to the other caller and vice versa, but it's also quite fast as you can establish a direct connection.

If P2P fails it will try to fallback to your configured TURN server and use that one for relaying.

However not every instance has one (as TURN servers are usually not that modern and straight forward...) and if this is the case it will fallback to Matrix's global TURN servers.

aksdb@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 183d

XMPP is also still a thing and IMO much easier to host (at least ejabberd is). Look into Movim, which looks quite nice as a discord replacement on top of XMPP.

ohshit604@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 183d

Setting up Element Call on my instance was difficult on its own, I understand why Synapse doesn’t come with it out of the box, essentially you spin up Matrix’s JWT service for authenticating clients and it if approved forwards the connection to the Livekit ports which must be opened on your firewall (ie port forwarded), otherwise people will not be able to connect to calls.

Big PITA and in my experience, on my home network, can conflict with games with VOIP chats so don’t follow the default 50000:55000 port range Livekit recommends or you’ll run into issues like I did, each person consumes 2 ports so adjust the range to your need.


Edit: I don’t suggest running Element Call standalone, it has issues of its own, once you get Livekit and JWT running and follow This guide you should have your element call support in Synapse now, pro-tip for those running synapse behind docker and get confused on the whole ./well-known part of the documentation you can edit your ./well-known in your homeserver.yaml file like such:

serve_server_wellknown: true

extra_well_known_client_content:
  optional: client
  "org.matrix.msc4143.rtc_foci": [
      {
          "type": "livekit",
          "livekit_service_url": "https://livekit-jwt.your.domain/"
      }
  ]
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 182d

I couldn't figure out how to sign up for matrix server. Maybe there are peer tube videos.

quaff@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 183d

https://matrix-construct.github.io/tuwunel/deploying/docker.html?highlight=voice#voice-communication

tuwunel seems to have some docker guides for how to set up voice & docker.

Magnum@infosec.pub · 0 pts · 182d

Have you Trier ESS?

quaff@lemmy.ca · 34 pts · 183d (38 replies)

Check out https://stoat.chat/, it's the closest self hostable group communications platform to Discord.

Pika@sh.itjust.works · 38 pts · 183d (6 replies)

Just a fair warning in reply to this that the self-hosted version of Stoat doesn't currently have voice chat. It's an open issue that's currently paused until they can finish their rework.

If you have the skill for it, it seems like you can patch work the existing voice chat back in, but it's not part of their initial setup and there's no instructions on how to do so properly

verdigris@lemmy.ml · 21 pts · 183d

Well that seems like a fairly big deal.

quaff@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Link to their voice chat implementatoon.

Looks like you can enable it on self hosted version. Probably worth someone trying it out personally. Before giving up on stoat.

Pika@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 183d (2 replies)

sadly, it's a little more complex than just enabling it. The supported self host deployment uses docker, and the docker containers that are available don't contain the interfaces for voice or video calling as they are not up to date.

If I understand it right, to enable it would mean you need to either pull the source yourself and run it off of docker, or make a custom docker image using a version of stoat web that contains the ability to do voice calls.

reading the draft of the linked issue, it looks like the author isn't doing voice call for the reason that they don't know the proper way to integrate it into the docker image.

So to answer it: yes it looks like you can use voice servers on the current self hosted model, but you can't use pre-existing docker images, and it will require you to manually add the new web UI in and patch where needed.

quaff@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 183d

Turns out they also don't support federation or e2ee. If those are things you care about.

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 183d

Is there a docker-free build you can either install and mod to re-enable voice, or use to mod the docker blobs in accordance ?

hushable@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 183d

I've been using it since it was called Revolt and quite like it, albeit I've never used the voice feature. My group doesn't really have the need for it, but I can see it being a deal breaker for the self-hosted version.

hesh@quokk.au · 20 pts · 183d (25 replies)

Honestly the name choice adds difficulty in getting friends to take it seriously. Why did they pick "stoat"

Tetsuo@jlai.lu · 35 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Nowadays everyone accepted the name "Discord" but I think it's a pretty poor choice of branding too.

A communication app called Discord is pretty weird too.

A stoat is a pretty cool animal.

I think without prior knowledge of any voice chat Discord would probably rate worse in perception than Stoat.

early_riser@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 182d

Nowadays everyone accepted the name “Discord” but I think it’s a pretty poor choice of branding too.

A terrible name for an app meant to facilitate communication. Always baffled me. But the name is so widely recognized that nobody thinks twice about it.

I always thought Noosphere would make a cool name for a Discord replacement, especially if it incorporates a way to permanently catalog the knowledge accrued by the community, say as a built-in wiki. That might actually make it viable as a support platform.

lime@feddit.nu · 17 pts · 183d (14 replies)

you mean unlike the tools discord has replaced, such as "mumble", "ventrilo", "roger wilco" and "trillian"?

borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 183d

Xfire

autonomoususer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 183d (6 replies)

Mumble is a verb like chat but what the fuck has a stoat got anything to do chatting?

lime@feddit.nu · 6 pts · 183d (5 replies)

now do the other ones

autonomoususer@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 183d (4 replies)

Do them yourself and you want to copy all those failed apps, lmao.

gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Mumble is great and I still use it. None of those are failed apps.

Not every app seeks to rake in teenagers' parents' money with shit like premium emojis.

autonomoususer@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 183d

So, where are all the posts saying, 'self-hosted ventrilo?'

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Discord never replaced mumble. The two are in different circles.

lime@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 183d

for some, yeah. depends on your use case.

hesh@quokk.au · 0 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Unironically yes

lime@feddit.nu · 5 pts · 183d (2 replies)

soundn like a problem with your friends then. who doesn't love a stoat?

hesh@quokk.au · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

I know, it's picky lol. I'm still considering it as the replacement for my discord groups (also checking out Element/Matrix). The average users aren't going to be up for swapping around a lot of platforms, so I am hoping to make one big push on the platform of choice. "Revolt" would have gotten less "wtf is that, how do you even spell it?" than "Stoat"

lime@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 183d

for what it's worth matrix has worked well for us. it's apparently a bitch to set up though.

quaff@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 183d (2 replies)

No clue! It was revolt before. I think they had trademark issues with that name. What's wrong with stoat?

ttyybb@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 183d

I was wondering why I want getting any updates, checked thegithub a few months ago and found out they rebranded. Haven't had a chance to try the latest version out yet

SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 183d

Personally, I associate stoats with Dwarf Fortress. And much butchering thereof.

lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org · 6 pts · 183d

This whole "FOSS names are bad" sounds like a Mccarthyism sysop by this point. Like, really, who is pushing that crap?

hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 183d

What do you meeaaan? Stoats are fucking adorable!

Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 183d

The name doesnt matter

IRC is a stupid name too, unless you know what the letters stand for

Msn messenger was stupid

Icq was stupid

Wtf even is “skype”?

It just has to be unique

And a Stout is kinda cute

hexagonwin@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 183d

seems like they had a decent name 'revolt' but got some cease and desist and didn't resist and decided to switch.

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 183d

Stoats are awesome.

Mihies@programming.dev · 2 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Is there a significant benefit over matrix?

quaff@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 183d

From what I can tell, the only benefit is that the platform is close to the Discord experience. So people migrating to Stoat would feel right at home.

But there's no federation, no e2ee, apparently it's difficult to get voice setup if you self host...

Matrix has it's issues too. Goup chat e2ee is not good. No one uses it. But at least they've got federation.

https://continuwuity.org/ seems like a decent server to run if you want to run a matrix server.

eleijeep@piefed.social · 2 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Where is the documentation for self-hosting it?

quaff@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 183d

Check their GitHub. Although it looks like GitHub is having issues right now.

hexagonwin@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 183d

has anyone tried their iOS client? from their description it seems like it's less mature than the android version, kinda concerning as my friend group has some iphone users.

blueworld@piefed.world · 32 pts · 183d (8 replies)

There another thread about discord requiring a face scan next month,so I think alternatives might start getting pushed.

Such as https://stoat.chat/

Edit: Not sure you can self-host it, but it does have a back end server listed in it's source code with a docker, however it might just be for code testing.

Right RTFM... https://github.com/stoatchat/self-hosted yes you can self-hosted it.

atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 183d (1 reply)

To create an invite you:

# drop into mongo shell
docker compose exec database mongosh

# create the invite
use revolt
db.invites.insertOne({ _id: "enter_an_invite_code_here" })

That's pretty jank.

Also - I'm getting pretty fed-up with self-hosting documentation that assumes very specific environments and goes into detailed configuration for that environment. Don't tell me how to setup a server and how to enable/configure SSH and setup UFW as part of setting up your software. Just tell me how to setup your software and what ports it uses.

blueworld@piefed.world · 1 pts · 183d

True on the invite, but you know I bet it wouldn't take much to fix that code wise.

Having built a bit of software in multiple enviorns, I feel you on the very specific requirements... But it is a bitch to write something that works for all of them. It should be a damn site easier to install it though, especially if it's docker.

klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 7 pts · 183d (4 replies)

Wait, requiring a face scan of everyone?? I know they started doing that as an age verification thing for some people, but everyone?

blueworld@piefed.world · 3 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Your correction is accurate. I should have been more specific.

Discord announced on Monday that it’s rolling out age verification on its platform globally starting next month, when it will automatically set all users’ accounts to a “teen-appropriate” experience unless they demonstrate that they’re adults.

Users who aren’t verified as adults will not be able to access age-restricted servers and channels, won’t be able to speak in Discord’s livestream-like “stage” channels, and will see content filters for any content Discord detects as graphic or sensitive. They will also get warning prompts for friend requests from potentially unfamiliar users, and DMs from unfamiliar users will be automatically filtered into a separate inbox.

klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 2 pts · 183d

Less a correction, more a question. I'd heard about them doing it in some countries, I didn't see the post where it was going to be international.

Yeah. Solid chance I'm dropping the few discord-related things I do use here soon.

sigh

Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

That doesn't sound like it is necessary for private chat, the only thing I really use it for. Would be nice to have an alternative all the same

bytesonbike@discuss.online · 2 pts · 182d

It does lead to slippery slopes. First, it's to block "adult content".

Then, they'll consider certain topics "adult". News about current events? LGBT content? Video games with some violence in it?

Facebook is an example of this slippery slope. And for parts of the country, they do need to scan an ID.

CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 183d

Bummer that it doesn't have voice chat yet in the self hosted version. Hopefully soon - I would probably switch if they had that.

Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca · 30 pts · 183d (7 replies)

Back in my day, (shakes cane), Teamspeak and Ventrillo were the big voice chat platforms/tools. Both have text chat and channels/rooms; but their focus is voice chat for gaming.

Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe · 14 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Ventrillo.

Dammit, son, makin' me feel old now

lazynooblet@lazysoci.al · 10 pts · 183d (2 replies)

Roger Wilco

Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe · 6 pts · 183d

Hahahahaha

I'll be over here crying in the corner.

Next you're gonna mention ICQ

czardestructo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 182d

Wow you invoked a name I hadn't thought of in a very long time. Shit did I use that playing Unreal Tournament, StarCraft or was it late enough to be WoW?

Edit: final release 2003, guess it was unreal.

ati@piefed.social · 11 pts · 183d

What's that you say? IRC?

Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Ventrilo was awful, having huge delay. Also no persistent chat.

TeamSpeak is proprietary and required a license for more than 8 users iirc. Chat might have been persistent?

Mumble was/is king in terms of voice chat. Open source, fully featured, strong certificate based security, best latency. It's used as backend in many big games, too. No persistent chat, though.

We used IRC for chat and Mumble for voice like 10 years ago when I played Eve Online. Works great!

towerful@programming.dev · 3 pts · 182d

Mumble was awesome. It probably still is, to be fair

warmaster@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 183d (1 reply)

TeamSpeek or Mumble.

Both have excellent voice chat.

Bahnd@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 183d

Teamspeak still requires a license above a small user size, but has multiple clients that can accomodate different target audicences. The TS3 client still looks like it did back in the windows 7 days and the TS5 client is just copying discords homework (Not a clue what happend to 4 and I believe 6 is under development). Both use the same server backend and database structure so both work with one server and different user expirences.

Mumble is still the gold standard for handling large user bases (there is a reason big EvE Online alliances use mumble). It will take longer to set up, the configuration is handled by the server, not through authorized user accounts like TS.

Jumuta@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 183d

Matrix?

carrylex@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 183d (5 replies)

Matrix hoster here.

I would recommend Matrix as it has pretty much everything, including cross platform clients, threads, voice/video calls, screensharing, spaces (aka servers), federation and E2EE. Matrix also has bridges for Discord and pretty much every other service so this could ease transition...

But self hosting requires reading the docs and having some in depth knowledge and understanding as it can be quite complex.

I would recommend just creating a Matrix account on one of the common global servers and testing it.

If you want to self-host there are some pre-defined setups available (example) but I would still recommend to bring at least 5-10 hours.

Regarding operations: It's really resilient and barely ever breaks and also doesn't need a lot of resources. A 1-2vCPU server with under 1GB RAM server is enough for less than 10 people.

PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 183d (1 reply)

You se knowledgeable on this, so I hope you'll allow me to ask this.

I don't know anything about Discord, but I selfhost the Mattermost chat system for my family. They, too, are narrowing the free tier.

Can Matrix replace Mattermost for a family? Several separate "rooms" for various topics, plus 1-to-1 chats.

carrylex@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 183d

If it's just chatting with your use case: definetly yes

hexagonwin@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 183d (1 reply)

may i ask which homeserver and client you use? it seems like synapse and element is not the best choice especially for small number of people.

carrylex@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 183d

synapse and element/schildi-chat work quite well for me :)

On mobile the newer Element X clients usually lack some features (like calls) but you can use them quite well for chatting.

quaff@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 183d

E2EE group chats on matrix seems to be a huge problem still. I look forward to their MLS implementation. Hopefully that fixes a lot of these UX issues.

SystemL@literature.cafe · 20 pts · 182d

Surprised no one has said it yet, but matrix.

klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 17 pts · 183d (6 replies)

IRC, RocketChat, Slack. Technically Matrix, but for your usecase I wouldn't recommend it, as it's a bit heavy, and if you're just planning on using it with other people on the same server there's not a point.

EDIT: Just noticed the voice chat thing. I've used Jitsi for that, and it works well. Also self-hostable

altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Jitsi is great as a Skype/Zoom replacement. It's not a 'room' on a server, but voice and video chats are stable and fast.

klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 4 pts · 183d

Yeah, depending on what it's used for it can do well. If it's for scheduled calls, like with a weekly tabletop game, it can definitely work well. If it's for the more casual pop in/out that happens on a lot of Discords it's worse. I just don't know of a replacement for that aside Matrix

chris@lemmy.grey.fail · 5 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Not a bad recommendation, but I disagree.

Rocket chat is just as heavy (in fact, it federates to Matrix), uses MongoDB, and has steadily pulled features behind a paywall for years. To me, if I'm hosting the service on my own machines and I'm not using their live support, the idea of paying for the privilege of using it is absurd.

Matrix has come a long way, including integrated voice and video chats.

klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 5 pts · 183d

Fair, yeah. I didn't realize Rocket had gotten heavy. I hadn't used it in years, just remembered it being okay when I had. I've switched to XMPP for the same things I was using RC for, admittedly, it's just... More like a traditional texting app than emulating Discord's IRC-like experience

drkt@scribe.disroot.org · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Matrix is pretty lightweight if you use something like Conduit or its spinoffs for a homeserver instead of Synapse, which is very heavy.

klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol · 1 pts · 183d

Good to know! Might try that at some point, just to see. I don't care for most of the matrix UIs, but maybe self hosting one of them will make me xD

moonpiedumplings@programming.dev · 16 pts · 182d

https://github.com/spacebarchat/spacebarchat

Literally reverse engineered discord, made open source.

Novocirab@feddit.org · 15 pts · 183d (8 replies)

The Mastodon founder, Eugen Rochko, has just announced that "We’ve moved our internal communications from Discord to Zulip at Mastodon".

https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/116041405748460511

Zulip is probably more focused toward work than TTRPGs, but it can't hurt to try it. (I haven't tried it personally, yet.) It is self-hostable.

https://zulip.com/

D1re_W0lf@piefed.social · 9 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Zulip is great… on a PC. On mobile is a totally different thing, and not in a good way. 😕

bytesonbike@discuss.online · 3 pts · 182d (2 replies)

What was the problem with Zulip on mobile did you have?

I only use it for text chat, so I'm curious.

D1re_W0lf@piefed.social · 4 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Basically, the interface, or the almost lack of it. You use Discord on a PC or mobile and the experience is pretty much the same. On Zulip this does not happens. It’s a totally different experience with several things lacking, like the folder organization, for instance.

Discord on mobile

Zulip on mobile

non_burglar@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 182d

I've always found the Discord ui on desktop and mobile to be really bad, just very busy and unintuitive.

quaff@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 183d (1 reply)

It's a shame, zulip doesn't have e2ee. not even DMs. but they seem to be working towards federation of some sort? there are no good/perfect solutions out there.

bytesonbike@discuss.online · 2 pts · 182d

For e2ee, neither does Discord, nor Stoat, which is what most of these comments are pushing people towards.

bytesonbike@discuss.online · 3 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Five years ago, a open-source project I worked on moved to Zulip (from Slack) and it was a small hurdle. But after a month, I really like it!

So much that I've pushed a few other open source projects (who lived on Discord).

I was really surprised when I started a new job two years ago and THEY used a self-hosted Zulip. It's everything Im used to on Slack.

Discord has team speak/video sharing, which I don't think Zulip has. But then again, we use something else for video calls.

Limerance@piefed.social · 2 pts · 182d

Zulip integrates with Jitsi, Zoom, and Bigbluebutton for voice and video chat. Looks like a sensible solution.

lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org · 13 pts · 183d (5 replies)

XMPP aka Jabber.

Cyber@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Yeah, we're using Conversations and it's fine for most things.

Will be self hosting prosidy "sooon"... and it'll all be in-house.

lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 183d

Good luck! Report results.

ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 182d (2 replies)

Does XMPP work with group audio calling and video calling?

yessikg@fedia.io · 1 pts · 180d

Yes, depending on the server/client

lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 182d

To my not up-to-date knowledge (2021-ish) audio calls work but they require an extension (on both participants) and are limited to 1:1, no "audio conference" support.

I do think there's bridging for Mumble? If so that should at least cover the "audio chat" use case.

pedz@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 183d

I still use IRC. There are now modern web clients like The Lounge or Convos that can display/share images in the channels, keep history and push notifications. Apparently Convos can do video chat but I never tried it. Unfortunately I'm not aware of screen sharing features for any of these.

So on a very simple setup, you need an IRC server, then install and connect one of those clients to your server, and use them through a web browser, either on a computer or on a phone.

It's obviously not entirely Discord-like, but it is a simple way to chat and share images.

helios@social.ggbox.fr · 12 pts · 183d (2 replies)

My guess is that it would be difficult to find a piece of software that does all the stuff discord does. But I also think it's a non-issue. You could split these needs onto multiple solutions. My group uses mumble for gaming voicechat, Signal for group conversations, and a simple rtmp server for streaming. We don't need nor use discord and never did.

I like the idea of a single piece of software that does one job well instead of a giant powerhouse that does everything.

mr_pip@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 182d (1 reply)

i also have a mumble server but every once in a while we need streaming. what is your rtmp setup? i am thinking of mediamtx, but am annoyed by having to post the link to the stream every time and everyone needs to resize windows manually to fit all on ome screen.

helios@social.ggbox.fr · 1 pts · 182d

Nothing fancy, I just run this docker image which allows streaming to via OBS, and we can watch the streams with VLC. I'm sure there are better ways to do it but that works well enough for us. Do note that a few seconds of latency is to be expected with RTMP.

cosmicrose@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 183d (7 replies)

Matrix is an option but it’s slow and breaks all the time. I’m a big fan of XMPP myself but good luck convincing anyone else to make an account 😔

Bahnd@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 183d (4 replies)

Dont knock matrix for being slow, it updates just as fast as anyone else's network speed is and it is focused on encryption and security. Given [gestures broadly to everything these days] people moving away from major platforms should really take into account their digital footprint and privacy.

ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 183d (2 replies)

So do you have to have an account on a specific server and then get the client or get the client first? I can't recall how to do it any longer.

Bahnd@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Its pretty similar to Lemmy or anything else in the fediverse, someones full user name includes their home server.

Your admin just needs to have configured the service to except comminication from other servers and not just its internal users.

ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 182d

I'm on dbzer0 and they have one. Does that mean I can just use my dbzer0 account?

cosmicrose@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 183d

That’s fair

hexagonwin@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 183d (1 reply)

could you recommend a good xmpp setup? i heard good things about snikket, maybe something else too?

cosmicrose@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 183d

I’m running Prosody and it was easy to set up and the docs are good.

Actionschnils@feddit.org · 10 pts · 182d (3 replies)

We switched to element (matrix-protocol) a while ago. Until now it worked fine for us - without any real problems. It already got a native voice/video-call implementation. But i heard that selfhosting isnt that smooth

https://element.io/de

mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Yeah, self-hosting it can be a bear, especially since you need to deal with the whole “bots trying to kill it will regularly post CSAM in random channels, and if any of your users are in that channel it will federate to your own server and now you have CSAM saved on your server’s cache” stuff. It’s the same problem that Lemmy was dealing with during Reddit’s APIcolypse. You can always choose not to federate, but that largely defeats the point of the protocol existing in the first place.

You also need to set up TURN servers to get functional voice/video calls. WebRTC (like voice/video calling) tends to throw a fit without some sort of TURN functionality. That’s something the average Joe won’t know how to do, and is typically going to require a paid tier from some external host like Cloudflare.

Edit: I looked it up. Cloudflare offers TURN servers, with the first 1000GB for free each month, but then it charges for use after that. But that does mean a server that gets used for video calls more than a few hours per month could end up incurring costs. Because that TURN server would be handling all of the video streaming data, so it will quickly eat that 1000GB limit. It also means true self-hosting is prohibitively difficult, as you’d be tying yourself to an external provider unless you go out of your way to host your own TURN server.

early_riser@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 182d

Why federate if you’re just expecting a small group of friends to use it?

petersr@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 182d

I feel like Matrix has gotten a lot of hate the last year or so. Don't really know why. Perhaps people see it as being misguided.

lazynooblet@lazysoci.al · 9 pts · 182d

Something that wasn't posted here yet but I just got told about: https://fluxer.app/

A chat platform that answers to you, not investors. It's ad-free, open source, community-funded, and never sells your data or nags you with upgrade pop-ups.

Over time, we'd love to explore optional monetisation tools that help creators and communities earn, with a small, transparent fee that keeps the app sustainable.

Wawe@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 183d

I replaced Discord(and Whatsapp) with Matrix/Element as voice chat (and general chat) with my wife. I remember running it with Docker was bit annoying to set up (I was selfhosting beginner when first doing it now it could be easier), but with Yunohost it is one click install (if you are willing with swap operating server).

Nextcloud Talk could work for your needs, but I have not personally used it so hard to recommend it.

StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org · 9 pts · 183d

I would take a look at TeamSpeak or Matrix.

Of the two Matrix is probably the closest to Discord.

cenotaph@piefed.zip · 8 pts · 183d

teamspeak6 is in beta right now but it is my replacement for discord. Check it out, supports most anything people have used disc for

SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 182d
apftwb@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Any Matrix clients support screensharing?

mrnobody@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 183d

I am not knowledgeable enough yet, but doesn't self-hosting Nextcloud have a voice feature? I'm looking into setting that all up myself

sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io · 3 pts · 182d

I'm hosting a matrix server it was rough but not impossible. Using conduit as the backend. Now that the setup is finally done it was so worth it. I would do it again if needed. Coturn was easy to set up along side it.

digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 183d

TeamSpeak 6 maybe. Don’t know where they’re up to on it at the moment kinda lost the thread a while ago.

Brief lookup seems things are still selfhosted: https://github.com/teamspeak/teamspeak6-server

I don't know how often its updated though all things considered. I've been out of the 'clans' games for sometime and just easing myself back into things from those rose tinted glory days of Blueyonder Gaming, Barrysworld and Gamespy shenanigans.

First ever live voice over IP I used was Roger Wilco where I met the misses and spent the current 30 years messing around. Roger Wilco(Bought out by Gamespy), Ventrillo, mumble, ICQ, TS, TS3, Discord seems like we're coming full circle again 🥲. Ah the nostalgia.

sbeak@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 183d

Would Matrix be a good option? I think they have voice chat. There's a bunch of clients that you can pick from (Element, FluffyChat, etc) that seem pretty good

ppb1701@ppb.social · 2 pts · 183d

@Vaggumon I think the nearest thing might be matrix....someone else might know other stuff

quantumcheap@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 181d

Self hosting a Matrix server was daunting when I first looked into it, so concerns over it being difficult to deploy are pretty founded. But that changed when I discovered this repo. This makes quick work of getting one spun up, but the true gem of this is their documentation. They've probably got the best documentation I've ever read that explains the "why's" and not just the "how's".

https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy

Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz · 2 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
CSAM Child Sexual Abuse Material
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
IP Internet Protocol
PIA Private Internet Access brand of VPN
SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
VPN Virtual Private Network
XMPP Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol ('Jabber') for open instant messaging
nginx Popular HTTP server

6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 13 acronyms.

[Thread #79 for this comm, first seen 9th Feb 2026, 22:30] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

ohshit604@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 183d
[ removed ]
False@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 183d

Haven't found one that's as good yet personally...

communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz · 1 pts · 182d

Matrix, I recommend tuwunel

core@leminal.space · 1 pts · 182d

Teamspeak

EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 183d (3 replies)

Short answer: No Long answer: No, but maybe in a year or two?

baatliwala@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 183d (2 replies)

Is Stoat not an alternative, it literally copies the UI too

ICastFist@programming.dev · 1 pts · 182d

It's voice chat features are lacking, it has no video chat yet

EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 182d

As of right now no. Too many missing features.

But in a year or two…

Kubiac@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 183d (1 reply)

Good old Teamspeak 3 or 6

ppb1701@ppb.social · 1 pts · 183d

@Kubiac @Vaggumon Man I remember using that like 15 years ago or so at a job. I honestly didn't realize it was still going. cool!

InFerNo@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 182d (2 replies)

Yes, Mattermost. It's very similar to Slack and Discord. I have hosted it for years for our organization.

There's a web interface, and has an app available. Can have all sorts of integrations and bridges to other services.

dude@lemmings.world · 10 pts · 182d (1 reply)

Mind you that they keep paywalling previously free features. Example of them paywalling group calls and their Playbooks feature (v1 - generally available, v2 - in paid plans only): https://docs.mattermost.com/product-overview/mattermost-v10-changelog.html

ITGuyLevi@programming.dev · 3 pts · 182d

When I realized they paywalled OIDC I had to look elsewhere.

quaff@thecanadian.social · 1 pts · 183d
daslfc@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 182d

I think you can hlst your own teamspeak server

aksdb@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 183d

For 7 people you could look into Virola Messenger. Not open source but uses Mumble under the hood and is super lightweight. No electron shit.

ICastFist@programming.dev · 0 pts · 182d (3 replies)

Rocket.chat would be my first recommendation, tho it looks more corporate aimed. It also claims to support Matrix federation.

You could also give Jami a try, it's p2p so it doesn't need servers.

clif@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 182d (2 replies)

RocketChat is pretty easy to setup with docker. I couldn't get it to work in podman after many, many hours of trying despite the documentation saying it does. They have a dedicated podman doc page but I just hit problem after problem after problem. I was trying to do it with the containerized mongo as a PoC though - a lot of problems came from that (mongo connection). Maybe I'll try again with a "real" db server. Root cause seemed to be networking differences between docker and podman.

I found it really odd that your server has to get a registration key from their server... That part weirds me out.

ICastFist@programming.dev · 3 pts · 182d (1 reply)

I found it really odd that your server has to get a registration key from their server

Huh, I didn't know that, maybe that's only with the docker image? If not, that's bad news waiting to happen, I'm afraid :/

clif@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 182d

Looks like you called it. Seems the container image(s) default to a subscription plan ("Starter", free for <50 users) but apparently you can revert to the "Community Edition" which gets rid of it.

Found this post over at the place we no longer speak of :

Hello, I'm Gabriel Engel, the founder of Rocket.Chat. I want to clarify that there is no new limitation for community use. We've recently introduced a plan offering all enterprise features for free to groups with fewer than 25 users. For those with more users, you have the opportunity to try the enterprise features. After the trial period, the system will automatically revert to the community version. However, you have the option to bypass the trial in the admin settings. I emphasize that we are not imposing any restrictions; instead, we're providing the enterprise version free to small teams and inviting larger teams to experience it. Let's view this as the positive initiative it is. For more details, please visit our forum: https://forums.rocket.chat/t/introducing-the-starter-plan-free-access-to-premium-features-for-limited-scale-use/18736

In the admin settings for your instance you can go to the "Subscription" panel and down at the veeeery bottom is a "Cancel Subscription" button (I'm on the free "starter" subscription, apparently). I'm assuming that's how you back out of it.

Once I have a chance to warn users that I'm about to do something potentially dramatic, I'll test it out and see what happens.

EDIT: Also found this in the RC forums (from 2 years ago) :

Note, if you upgrade or install new version of RC, it will automatically put you at a Starter or Pro plan, to go to the community, go to Admin settings, remove the key and it will put you back to the Community version… It took me a while to figure this out :slight_smile:

O, and the immediate next post is what I described above :

I believe community is still available within v6.6.0, but new instllation will put you automatically to the Starter Plan. You need to cancel subscription going to Setting → Subscription → Cancel Subscription

drk0027@social.vivaldi.net · -1 pts · 183d

@Vaggumon mattermost es bastante similar a discord. Con todo y los canales y roles y bots