That's because Trump wasn't a client, or even a business partner, he was Epstein's friendly competitor. Trump ran his own underage model trafficking ring.
He certainly attended Epstein parties, but he also held his own underage sex parties.
This link talks about it more, and has an interview from Luther Campbell, AKA Uncle Luke of 2 Live Crew about attending, and fleeing, from such a party.
Epstein got most of his victims through MC2 Model Management, a fake agency set up by a French pedo billionaire named Brunel.
Now, the feeder agency for the girls was a Ukrainian agency, also set up by Brunel, called Mother 1.
This feeder agency supplied girls to Trump Model Management, MC2, and a third agency called ID, or Identity Modeling.
ID, founded in the early to mid 90s, was operated by a man named Paolo Zampolli, he was in charge of the fake visas, and was hired by Trump to become the head of Trump international development. He's currently at the UN, appointed by Trump.
All of this, except ID, was set up after Trump's main source of underage girls was forced out of his own modeling agency, John Casablancas of Elite Model Management. (1998)
Trump only bought the beauty pageants because he hosted a contest with Casablancas called Look of the Year. (1992) This was Casablancas' main way of finding new girls to rape. Because competitive girls were more "willing". Girls as young as 13 or 14.
Casablancas even bragged about it in a 1988 New Yorker Magazine cover story titled "Girl Crazy". It was gross.
Trump was also mentioned in that issue, a bit later on in another article. He and Casablancas were already moving in the same social circle, but after that article became fast friends.
I don't actually know when Epstein joined in, but he was a bit player until he had MC2 to draw on.
In other news, I’ve signed an executive order that states Donald Trump doesn’t get to eat anymore. This is valid and legal, as my executive order says it is valid and legal.
Pfft, rookie executive ordering right here. I've just signed a very cool and very legal executive order stating that the orange child rapist should be beaten with a baseball bat every hour on the hour.
I believe this is actually one of the main objectives of gen AI. Since anyone can now generate believable fake content about anyone and anything, any politician or billionaire can dismiss legit evidence as generated by AI. Only official sources will be considered trustworthy and they'll say whatever is in the oligarchs' best interests.
I've said it often, that the reason you see the biggest supporters of GenAI being right wingers and their proxies is because they know they can never compete on facts and truth, so rather than changing what they are.. they are gonna use GenAI to change reality itself for all their idiotic supporters.
This is why Sam Altman was so keen for people to use him in Sora clips. He can claim that literally any compromising photo or video of him is just AI generated. It's the boy who cried wolf, except the boy wants people to stop believing him.
I feel like some people here are missing the joke. The point is yes it's a very convincing AI photo. The fact that people believe it's real shows why we need AI regulations.
The walker legs work fine at first, but I'm getting a headache staring at them because they're uncanny. Also, funny that the AI "knows" the rear legs should have tennis balls, so it colored the feet that way.
I actually bought this for a minute because his dementia is causing visible issues with his stride. Watch his swing his right leg in a semi-circle. Doctors say that's a clear sign.
I suspect he wouldn't be shuffling around behind a $30 walmart/amazon generic walker. They'd have an aide at his sides or push him around in a wheelchair with a fake cast on his foot.
Good AI generated images are indistinguishable from real ones (you just haven't been noticing them). AI slop is just lazy generations without any touch ups or polishing and mass produced by bots.
This is the real take! The only giveaway I see is he doesn't look like he's supporting himself in the walker, despite him always looking like he is using one regardless cause of his shoe lifts.
The faces of the people in the background give it away for me. You would also expect to be able to read the exit sign above the door. The arm of the guy who's on the right also looks deformed. Oh, and there's a weird part on the carpet. It looks like it's supposed to be a shadow but there's shadows on top of it.
His right hand has an extra joint in it. Also the legs on the walker are a bit wonky on that side as well; they both kind of look like they're in front.
Not his current face structure. he hasn't looked like that since before 2019
Exit sign while blurred doesn't read exit.
The photo is very potato, while the bokeh is clearly strong. You don't get that depth of field at 15 ft on a cell phone. you'd need an slr and a telephoto, which he clearly would not allow
carpet pattern is at a odd angle. the next pattern back is square. the one at the base of the walker is several inches deviated between the two wheels.
no leg braces, legs are too trim
less clear reasons:
the left door configuration is screwy, if you close or open the two visible doors in the picture, you'll have trouble making their geometry fit with what would work in the hallway/office shape. the open on the left has a pushbar, but the right side has a handle. they don't lineup, if this is an extended hall and that's an open office on the right, it's covering up a LOT more of the hall than it should perspective wise.
They'd have him in a chair, or walking with people as aids to hide it.
Snopes is getting weak. Remember when we used to have to read through paragraphs of repetitive details before they ever got to the point?
That one was refreshingly quick & to-the-point.
Edit: upon closer inspection I see that article seemed short and quick to the point because you have to be a subscriber or allow ads in order to see the whole article.
Upon closer inspection I see that snopes article seemed short & to the point because they require people to be paid subscribers or allow ads in order to see the whole article.
Bans states from regulating AI, gets AI images making fun of him... Honestly it's just to believable of an image so people are complaining. Should have went much farther
It's already out there and accessible by every household and nation state alike.
Not using it is giving your enemy the advantage, and when that enemy wants to genocide people it goes beyond irresponsible to not use it to fight back.
Can you honestly say a future historian having to dig a bit further to ascertain if something was true or not is worse than losing an entire election to fascists because idiots believe the first video they saw online?
You know, in nearly every thread about Trump there's someone posting some nasty word vomit about Trump and Putin and Musk and whoever performing vile acts on each other, and I always have to scroll past the thread asap before the mental image gets too deeply lodged in my brain. I guess some people really do just have a fetish for flabby old psychopaths
It's somewhat funny that we've now done the second task here, as well as updating it to (mostly) make a photo of a bird, about 10 years later. But the requested next step, 'identify if the image is AI generated', is still a research team and years away.
So what happens if a state regulates AI anyway? It's like in EU where if a country refuses they will say "bad country! bad!" and maybe lose some funds?
Historically, they would withhold funds, and grants. They could crack down in federal enforcement of illegal substances. The executive department isn't completely without teeth.
In the current climate, they could probably sue the states for something then have the SOCTUS make it illegal and start hauling off state officials.
130 Comments
NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org · 170 pts · 249d
PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 249d
Thank you I had to search this up.
NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org · 11 pts · 249d
And it's AI generated.
MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world · 115 pts · 249d
I believe that the current republican plan is to run the clock out.
They will not release un-redacted Epstein files until after Donald Trump dies.
chaogomu@lemmy.world · 88 pts · 249d
That's because Trump wasn't a client, or even a business partner, he was Epstein's friendly competitor. Trump ran his own underage model trafficking ring.
titanicx@lemmy.zip · 19 pts · 249d
Why not both?
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 249d
He was certainly sampling the goods, so to speak.
chaogomu@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d
He certainly attended Epstein parties, but he also held his own underage sex parties.
This link talks about it more, and has an interview from Luther Campbell, AKA Uncle Luke of 2 Live Crew about attending, and fleeing, from such a party.
https://www.wonkette.com/p/welcome-to-trumps-teenybopper-model
As an added bonus, here's the history of Trump and John Casablancas.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/10/6/1578544/-The-Untold-Story-of-Trump-Model-Management-A-Daily-Kos-Exclusive-Part-1
Trump was part of the child sex trafficking scene before Epstein was.
n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 247d
Didn't he say something on Howard Stern back in the 90s about how girls needed to be at least 10 for him to fuck 'em?
AuroraZzz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
I always assumed Trump was using the beauty pageants to traffic girls to Epsteins island. Trump being a competitor to Epsteins is a good theory too
chaogomu@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 247d
Epstein got most of his victims through MC2 Model Management, a fake agency set up by a French pedo billionaire named Brunel.
Now, the feeder agency for the girls was a Ukrainian agency, also set up by Brunel, called Mother 1.
This feeder agency supplied girls to Trump Model Management, MC2, and a third agency called ID, or Identity Modeling.
ID, founded in the early to mid 90s, was operated by a man named Paolo Zampolli, he was in charge of the fake visas, and was hired by Trump to become the head of Trump international development. He's currently at the UN, appointed by Trump.
All of this, except ID, was set up after Trump's main source of underage girls was forced out of his own modeling agency, John Casablancas of Elite Model Management. (1998)
Trump only bought the beauty pageants because he hosted a contest with Casablancas called Look of the Year. (1992) This was Casablancas' main way of finding new girls to rape. Because competitive girls were more "willing". Girls as young as 13 or 14.
Casablancas even bragged about it in a 1988 New Yorker Magazine cover story titled "Girl Crazy". It was gross.
Trump was also mentioned in that issue, a bit later on in another article. He and Casablancas were already moving in the same social circle, but after that article became fast friends.
I don't actually know when Epstein joined in, but he was a bit player until he had MC2 to draw on.
MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world · 2 pts · 248d
That’s the thing that I don’t get. We know he’s a disgusting rapist creep. We know he also “likes ‘‘em young”.
The only thing shocking about when he said Epstein likes ‘em young is Trump thinks there’s a difference between 13 and 15.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 249d
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 71 pts · 249d
In other news, I’ve signed an executive order that states Donald Trump doesn’t get to eat anymore. This is valid and legal, as my executive order says it is valid and legal.
D_C@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 249d
Pfft, rookie executive ordering right here. I've just signed a very cool and very legal executive order stating that the orange child rapist should be beaten with a baseball bat every hour on the hour.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 249d
Hah! Republicans will just change the definition of an hour.
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
And baseball bat
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 248d
I dunno, they probably don’t want to mess with anything sports as it could piss off their constituents.
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
Baseball is gay and woke, everyone knows the manly men play Trumpball ™️
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 248d
I’m guessing there’s not a lot of movement in Trump ball.
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
On the contrary. There are lots and lots of movements, it can get quite messy at times
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 249d
Sometimes you just gotta hit'em with a tariff.
ToffeeIsForClosers@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
That was hilarious, more so I think because I had no idea what the premise was and had to figure it out on the fly.
Instant fan. Thanks for sharing!
Today@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 249d
When do "Couchfucker '26" hats go on sale?
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca · 52 pts · 248d
You can tell it's fake because it's not a gold, jewel-encrusted walker
GenosseFlosse@feddit.org · 9 pts · 248d
Also not bigly enough!
DupaCycki@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 248d
I believe this is actually one of the main objectives of gen AI. Since anyone can now generate believable fake content about anyone and anything, any politician or billionaire can dismiss legit evidence as generated by AI. Only official sources will be considered trustworthy and they'll say whatever is in the oligarchs' best interests.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 248d
I've said it often, that the reason you see the biggest supporters of GenAI being right wingers and their proxies is because they know they can never compete on facts and truth, so rather than changing what they are.. they are gonna use GenAI to change reality itself for all their idiotic supporters.
TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone · 7 pts · 248d
This is why Sam Altman was so keen for people to use him in Sora clips. He can claim that literally any compromising photo or video of him is just AI generated. It's the boy who cried wolf, except the boy wants people to stop believing him.
BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip · 42 pts · 248d
I feel like some people here are missing the joke. The point is yes it's a very convincing AI photo. The fact that people believe it's real shows why we need AI regulations.
expatriado@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 249d
nobody will be chanting ai slop on this blessed day
lividweasel@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 249d
Finally, a good use for AI
shalafi@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 249d
The walker legs work fine at first, but I'm getting a headache staring at them because they're uncanny. Also, funny that the AI "knows" the rear legs should have tennis balls, so it colored the feet that way.
I actually bought this for a minute because his dementia is causing visible issues with his stride. Watch his swing his right leg in a semi-circle. Doctors say that's a clear sign.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 249d
The back legs have standard rubber stoppers. Tennis balls are a hack people use when those wear out.
jj4211@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 249d
I found it funny that the shelves at the store that had walkers also had tennis balls...
anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 248d
No the tennis balls slide better on hard floors. The rubber feet are usually still under the tennis balls.
Source: I had old relatives who lived in nursing homes with these. They got the tennis balls on day one with the walker.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
Also, tennis balls vary when it comes to grip depending on the thickness of the felt covering.
Source: Had a grandma with a walker and I had to buy special tennis balls for her. RIP Grammy
anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 248d
Didn’t know that, the home they were in had a stash of balls ready when we needed them.
shalafi@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 247d
Yeah, but they don't come from the factory colored "tennis ball yellow". :)
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 247d
That's dirty beige.
echodot@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 248d
When my grandmother first had to have a walker basically the first thing she did was put tennis balls on it.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 249d
Non-eucludian walker. Some fucking Lovecraft style geometry right there.
IDew@feddit.nl · 26 pts · 249d
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 248d
He looks too lucid so definitely AI.
Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 3 pts · 248d
Almost like a human being.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
He can only approximate one.
Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 248d
"Approximate" is doing a lit of heavy lifting here.
sunbytes@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 248d
You had me until I zoomed on the face. He looks like he's not regularly sundowning.
So it must be an old picture.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 248d
I suspect he wouldn't be shuffling around behind a $30 walmart/amazon generic walker. They'd have an aide at his sides or push him around in a wheelchair with a fake cast on his foot.
I'd say it's a relatively decent looking fake.
lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 247d
Yeah, they'd wheel him around behind the scenes in a golden wheelchair and only have him sitting. They'd never risk this photo in real life.
TachyonTele@piefed.social · 18 pts · 248d
This is pretty impressive imo.
What gives it away as ai slop? I'm not seeing anything standout.
DrDickHandler@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 248d
Good AI generated images are indistinguishable from real ones (you just haven't been noticing them). AI slop is just lazy generations without any touch ups or polishing and mass produced by bots.
YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 248d
This is the real take! The only giveaway I see is he doesn't look like he's supporting himself in the walker, despite him always looking like he is using one regardless cause of his shoe lifts.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
+1
ISO noise + JPEG is great at hiding imperfections, though. I hope the spammers don't figure this out.
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 248d
Hair looks too natural
elfin8er@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 248d
The faces of the people in the background give it away for me. You would also expect to be able to read the exit sign above the door. The arm of the guy who's on the right also looks deformed. Oh, and there's a weird part on the carpet. It looks like it's supposed to be a shadow but there's shadows on top of it.
thegoodyinthehoody@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 248d
Guess he should have regulated ai then
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
We all understand multiple things can cast shadows at once, yeah?
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
Most everything you're describing looks like ISO/compression noise. Or (with faces/the exit sign) out-of-focus background.
...An issue is that most social media users have become accustomed to recompressed potato JPEGs, and that just happens to 'hide' artifacts quite well.
noride@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 248d
To my eye, the left side of his legs don't really line up correctly with his torso in this image.
Grass@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 248d
do they line up normally though?
noride@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 248d
We'll need to cross reference with a centaur to be sure.
TachyonTele@piefed.social · 4 pts · 248d
I've played Breath of the Wild. He does not look like the centaurs in that.
He's a lot flabbier. And leans forward more.
And his hooves are tiny.
Pappabosley@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
That's why he needs the walker
yggstyle@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
He always was a crooked man.
mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 248d
His right hand has an extra joint in it. Also the legs on the walker are a bit wonky on that side as well; they both kind of look like they're in front.
rumba@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 248d
Clearest reasons:
Cheap $30 walker
Not his current face structure. he hasn't looked like that since before 2019
Exit sign while blurred doesn't read exit.
The photo is very potato, while the bokeh is clearly strong. You don't get that depth of field at 15 ft on a cell phone. you'd need an slr and a telephoto, which he clearly would not allow
carpet pattern is at a odd angle. the next pattern back is square. the one at the base of the walker is several inches deviated between the two wheels.
no leg braces, legs are too trim
less clear reasons:
the left door configuration is screwy, if you close or open the two visible doors in the picture, you'll have trouble making their geometry fit with what would work in the hallway/office shape. the open on the left has a pushbar, but the right side has a handle. they don't lineup, if this is an extended hall and that's an open office on the right, it's covering up a LOT more of the hall than it should perspective wise.
They'd have him in a chair, or walking with people as aids to hide it.
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 248d
It's just him standing normaly, except holding a walker, the timing of the image, as one user mentioned: not gold encrusted
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 248d
if it was made of gold, it would be quite too heavy for his brittle centuar bones,.
dermanus@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 247d
Nah, spray paint wouldn't add much weight.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 247d
still too much for trump lol.
MeThisGuy@feddit.nl · -2 pts · 248d
plz don't start normalizing AI
TachyonTele@piefed.social · 7 pts · 248d
How is asking what's to tell it's slop normalizing it?
MeThisGuy@feddit.nl · -2 pts · 248d
TachyonTele@piefed.social · 5 pts · 248d
And?
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
I don't understand what just happened.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 248d
Trump is bad enough that no one should need to make anything up about him.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 248d
Snopes is getting weak. Remember when we used to have to read through paragraphs of repetitive details before they ever got to the point?
That one was refreshingly quick & to-the-point.
Edit: upon closer inspection I see that article seemed short and quick to the point because you have to be a subscriber or allow ads in order to see the whole article.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
It's a changing world.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 247d
Upon closer inspection I see that snopes article seemed short & to the point because they require people to be paid subscribers or allow ads in order to see the whole article.
miasmati@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 248d
No, spread it around. Let his followers believe it so that he loses influence with them.
This is a war, fight dirty.
Randomgal@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 248d
No thanks. In trying to get rid of fascists and war criminals, not looking to become one of them .
Nalivai@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 248d
They go low we go high, huh? I bet that will work
tlmcleod@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 248d
Dunno, I'm pretty high right now. Seems to be working
miasmati@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 246d
Yeah see they're not fascists and war criminals because they understand publicity.
They're fascists and war criminals because of their political ideology and committing war crimes.
You however seem to want to protect and enable them, so I'd say you're already pretty far on the road to being one of them.
Randomgal@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 246d
If you act like a Nazi, you're a Nazi.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
The worst thing you can do for a cause you care about is to lie about it. That's a Trump move.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 248d
And let future future generations try to fix the breakage? “Trump was great, its AI fake history, let’s MAGA Again”.
Slop is a historical catastrophe. Using it as a weapon is irresponsible.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
Bans states from regulating AI, gets AI images making fun of him... Honestly it's just to believable of an image so people are complaining. Should have went much farther
miasmati@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 246d
It's already out there and accessible by every household and nation state alike.
Not using it is giving your enemy the advantage, and when that enemy wants to genocide people it goes beyond irresponsible to not use it to fight back.
Can you honestly say a future historian having to dig a bit further to ascertain if something was true or not is worse than losing an entire election to fascists because idiots believe the first video they saw online?
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 248d
Smoogs@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 248d
abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 pts · 248d
This kinda thing is the thing people were warning about.
DillDough@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 248d
Gee if only a certain someone didn't just ban any form of regulation on AI even down to the state level.
pupbiru@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 248d
huh i swear the republicans were all about… what was it… states… lefts? privileges?… hmmm… can’t be states rights: that would be hypocritical as fuck
Quexotic@infosec.pub · 7 pts · 248d
I mean, it's been too late for some time now.
SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world · 15 pts · 249d
I want to see nude pictures of the man.
ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works · 65 pts · 249d
kingofras@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 249d
ThanksObama responding to Satan with the Satan South Park meme is something I’ll need a serious meditation retreat for to process.
ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 249d
Anything else even close to him nude would require gallons of eye bleach. Can't afford that in this economy.
Gnugit@aussie.zone · 12 pts · 249d
*Santa
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 249d
Even better.
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 249d
Thanks, ThanksObama!
Vinny_93@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 249d
Ayyyy relax guy!
NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org · 26 pts · 249d
Vorticity@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 249d
I hate you so much right now. I'm laughing while trying to figure out how to scrub this from my mind.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 249d
That top one got me permabanned on Facebook... Like 10 months after I posted it far and wide to troll republican dipshits. No regrets.
dohpaz42@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 249d
Peak male performance.
over_clox@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 249d
No, no you don't.
foodandart@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 249d
:throws up in mouth a bit:
Get help for that kink. Really.
three@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 249d
:gets overly dramatic about jokes on the internet:
Oh the humanity!
leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 249d
It's a statue, but...
BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 248d
Awww my eyes!! Is there some kind of NSFW tag people could use or NSFL in this case so we don't have to see these kind of images?
bcgm3@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 249d
"Computer, is there any way to generate... A nude Trump?"
ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 249d
Can I get a hat wobble... and a flarghunnstow?
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
Woah.
I know I asked you to kick up the 4d3d3d3 just a minute ago, but could we actually have that turned off, because I feel queasy
Agent641@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 249d
This is what causes it to finally snap and start brute forcing the nuclear launch codes.
kingofras@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 249d
JD? Have Madam Kirk and Mister Thiel gotten boring already?
BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca · 3 pts · 249d
You know, in nearly every thread about Trump there's someone posting some nasty word vomit about Trump and Putin and Musk and whoever performing vile acts on each other, and I always have to scroll past the thread asap before the mental image gets too deeply lodged in my brain. I guess some people really do just have a fetish for flabby old psychopaths
incompetent@programming.dev · 2 pts · 249d
PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 249d
Hey Lemmy users is there a way we can ban AI images/posts without an AI or AI tag on it?
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 7 pts · 248d
Talk to your instance admins
Rhoeri@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
Just report it.
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
Move to piefed
TachyonTele@piefed.social · 2 pts · 247d
Why piefed?
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 247d
AI tagging is a feature exclusive to piefed (for now), which makes it much simpler to create a filter
TachyonTele@piefed.social · 2 pts · 246d
I didn't know that. Cool
korazail@lemmy.myserv.one · 3 pts · 248d
xkcd: Tasks https://xkcd.com/1425/
It's somewhat funny that we've now done the second task here, as well as updating it to (mostly) make a photo of a bird, about 10 years later. But the requested next step, 'identify if the image is AI generated', is still a research team and years away.
Spaniard@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 248d
So what happens if a state regulates AI anyway? It's like in EU where if a country refuses they will say "bad country! bad!" and maybe lose some funds?
87Six@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 248d
He'll just send the National Cronies in there to scare people
Dude is a literal fear mongerer. Hitler 2.0 except orange and much dumber
rumba@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 248d
Historically, they would withhold funds, and grants. They could crack down in federal enforcement of illegal substances. The executive department isn't completely without teeth.
In the current climate, they could probably sue the states for something then have the SOCTUS make it illegal and start hauling off state officials.
braydan@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world · 2 pts · 248d
Teehee
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 249d
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 249d
This reminds me of that no smoking sign I saw earlier. I ignored it. Delicious.