Dell and Lenovo may limit mid-range laptops to 8GB DDR5 RAM in response to rising memory prices
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-and-Lenovo-may-limit-mid-range-laptops-to-8GB-DDR5-RAM-in-response-to-rising-memory-prices.1185957.0.html
599 points · 218 comments · view on lemmy.world
218 Comments
JTskulk@lemmy.world · 233 pts · 239d
Do it. I know which OS will run fine on 8G of RAM and which one won't.
Damarus@feddit.org · 109 pts · 239d
I wouldn't be happy with 8 GB of RAM regardless of OS.
uranibaba@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 239d
Same, I am often about 8 GB of RAM with my daily usage.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 239d
Debian keeps barfing on me with 16.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net · 7 pts · 239d
Heh, I have 64 and still can run out. Teams and Outlook for work, one or two java projects in IntelliJ, rust project in Neovim... try to build and run tests with maven and I'm at 70-80% easily. Couple more tabs like discord and I'm out of memory.
Damarus@feddit.org · 3 pts · 239d
I feel that. My new workstation will have 128 GB, I'm very excited about it
kill_dash_nine@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 238d
What sort of apps are you running?
AbidanYre@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 238d
Mostly Firefox with an admittedly ridiculous number of tabs.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 237d
Those are load bearing tabs...
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 238d
Get yourself the ‘auto discard tabs’ extension.
Tbf Firefox seems to have started using much more memory a year or so ago: I could easily hit over 200 tabs, now fifty are a problem. Though it could just be me having switched to the developer edition.
laurelraven@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 238d
I think my last count hit north of 500 tabs...
I... I may have a bit of a problem...
AbidanYre@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
That's like an order of magnitude more than me. There's gotta be something else going on with my system.
foggenbooty@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 239d
Nor would I, but if apps were actually optimized instead of the Electron nonsense we have now we'd be in a better place. I really hope this forces us to finally build better again instead of relying on infinite resources.
5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 51 pts · 239d
Someone's smelling the year of the desktop
StitchInTime@piefed.social · 10 pts · 239d
I built a gaming PC last year with 32gb, and it’s time to upgrade my MacBook…
So, logically, I just moved my workflow to my desktop. I would say dual boot for the win… but honestly most of my games run great on Linux, so I think I’m just good there until and unless this blows over.
Mondez@lemdro.id · 1 pts · 238d
When I dual booted it was to try and get away from the win.
comador@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 239d
Minix and FreeBSD...
/runs; hides
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 239d
They don't care, my parents laptop was decently mid-range spec bar storage, manufacturer put in a 5400RPM spinning rust drive. It was damn near unusable, crap from the factory.
Was forced to use it once when visiting and noticed the performance, put an SSD in it and it's been a fine laptop since. They're perfectly willing to hobble a laptop to save a buck.
CaptDust@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 239d
I run fedora on 8GB and find it functional but definitely not comfortable. Anything past a dozen tabs and it starts getting choked up.
antrosapien@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 238d
Linux adoption.. accelerates
sefra1@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 239d
No OS if fine with 8GB if you use it for anything other than browsing memes
bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 239d
There's more than that ?
toddestan@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 239d
Actually, the web browser is one of the major offenders when it comes to consuming large amounts of RAM.
radioactivefunguy@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 239d
In a single tab
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 239d
You're thinking of CP/M, right?
0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 239d
Can CP/M address >= 2^32 bytes?
tal@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 239d
https://obsolescence.wixsite.com/obsolescence/cpm-internals
Sounds like it can't address > 2¹⁶ bytes.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
CP/M-86, maybe.
tomkatt@lemmy.world · 101 pts · 239d
Hah, guess they're gonna have to run Linux. Windows 11 would choke on 8 GB RAM.
tal@lemmy.today · 63 pts · 239d
FosterMolasses@leminal.space · 4 pts · 239d
lmaooooo
bananabread@lemmy.zip · 21 pts · 239d
It's the year of the Linux desktop!
themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 239d
I agree, funny enough they require minimum 4 GB, but I had problems with it with 16 GB. 8 GB is nowhere near enough, especially if you use excel, teams, and that crap.
Buckshot@programming.dev · 13 pts · 239d
I have to use windows at work, have 32gb and regularly get browser tabs unloaded for low memory. I'm not running VMs or anything. Usually just Firefox, visual studio, and slack.
Personal computer is Linux with 16gb and that's more than enough.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 238d
Same here. Modern 32 gb machine from work is a slog. 2 minutes from wake to actually working, can be 10 seconds just to use the start menu sometimes. Older thinkpad with 16gb and linux/cosmic desktop - wakes almost instantly and perfectly snappy for most things.
Zannsolo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
I have 64gb 32 for vm and 32 for host, security software eats it all. I pity the poor bastards on the 8gb work laptops. My project is funded separately from all the others so we got to order our own laptops. Our previous laptops sucked at 32gb total.
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 239d
Most bloated apps like outlook and teams etc regularly use nearly a gig of ram each in my experience. Brutal.
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 238d
I have single browser tabs that regularly suck down a whole gig. (And they still have input lag).
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 238d
Ya that depends on the content too and what bullshit they load on the background. In this context, these days I look at tabs as apps lol
relativestranger@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 237d
an 8gb pc with win11 is today's equivalent of running vista on 1gb.
some_designer_dude@lemmy.world · 77 pts · 239d
So RAM costs them more now, and they need to pass those costs onto customers. However, it seems like they’re also trying to redefine what “mid-range” means to us all, as if we aren’t fully aware of what computers are capable of and what amount of memory is good vs not. Making the various ranges cost more is intuitive. Enshitifying the ranges to sell them at the same price is just antithetical to the whole concept of the ranges…
some_designer_dude@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 239d
It’s like if batteries got stupid expensive and they tried to tell us 200km of range is what you get in a touring EV these days. But the distances between all the places haven’t changed…
Digit@lemmy.wtf · 15 pts · 239d
Can see that happening, in this fake economy.
Zephorah@discuss.online · 9 pts · 239d
Isn’t the issue here the newest generation? I keep reading they’re way less tech savvy than the rest of us. Blended in with the propensity for young people to have an iPhone or Android and no PC, well, this junk will likely slide right by.
some_designer_dude@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 239d
So our generation will be the first to have to teach both our boomer parents AND our millennial offspring what “RAM” is?!
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
Zephorah@discuss.online · 17 pts · 239d
GenX is mostly forgotten until tech support is needed, either direction, yes.
Millennials are fine, lol, and overlap with genx, this relates to the teens and early 20s age group.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 239d
We had two generations of competent people. It's a idiot sandwich but the bread is the stupid part!
Pika@sh.itjust.works · 76 pts · 239d
Maybe this will be a boon. The entire reason the ram requirements got so high as it is is because software optimization was put on the back burner. Maybe a ram shortage where people can't obtain the ram needed will force the big name software devs to start being more frugal with ram. (talking to you chrome... whom currently is using 2 gigs alone just trying to show a twitch stream...)
MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com · 67 pts · 239d
Or more realistically be used as an excuse for always online cloud based services a la office 365. "We would let you download the app, but most users don't have the computing power so instead we'll just make this a helpful subscription!"
CCMan1701A@startrek.website · 10 pts · 239d
Idk, trying to load up a couple spreadsheets in Edge is going to consume 8gb of Ram in no time.
MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com · 7 pts · 239d
"Oh don't worry, you won't have to actually load spreadsheets anymore, just give our AI full access to your files and it will do whatever you ask :)"
Ideally, you're correct though and companies start investing in optimization. I don't see it going that way, but a girl can dream.
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 6 pts · 239d
Oh fucking hell...
Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 238d
That would still pressure the browser teams to work on memory optimizations.
tal@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 239d
Honestly, it'll be more efficient to have memory in a datacenter in that hardware in a datacenter will see higher average capacity utilization, but it's gonna drive up datacenter prices too.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 238d
Not sure I agree. Centralizing storage, and especially memory, creates incredible round trip costs.
tal@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 238d
I mean, efficient in terms of memory utilization, like. Obviously there are gonna be associated costs and drawbacks with having remote compute.
Just that if the world has only N GB of RAM, you can probably get more out of it on some system running a bunch of containers, where any inactive memory gets used by some other container.
MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 239d
As a dirty commie, I agree, but unfortunately under capitalism it is just an avenue for exploitation. Large companies are deciding what we can or cannot have access to and setting the price for it in a manner completely divorced from what they're offering.
BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
But imagine the latency and network bandwidth issues, there's a reason most companies moved away from the huge central framework model to distributed computing
kieron115@startrek.website · 27 pts · 239d
At least one studio, Larian, has confirmed this is the case for them.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 239d
Good fuck studios just throwing optimization into the bin cause they can. They should fucking actually do some problem solving instead of brute forcing everything.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 239d
How do you take that from the comment above?
MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 239d
Not the person you're responding to, but "most likely, we already need to do a lot of optimization work in early access that we didn't necessarily want to do at that point" indicates to me that optimization was not a top priority. It's not unusual for people to optimize after a proof of concept or something, but I imagine in gaming (I don't do game dev admittedly) you don't want that too late in the process. If they're not planning on having it in early access, then their early consistent user base will be more worried about other things. If min spec is 8 then people with 4 won't get it or won't complain about poor performance because technically it's their machine that's the issue. Lack of complaints about that and feedback about other things further shifts the priority away from optimization. Plus, anyone who's worked in dev spaces or probably any kind of deliverable knows that there are things that just don't happen despite your best intentions. Things like optimization are the first to go in the dev space, so by openly admitting to putting it off, it does feel like an admission of "we were probably just not going to get around to it". In my experience, the further out you plan to optimize, the more man hours you end up wasting, so I don't see a company investing heavily in that at any point, but doing so post early launch seems wasteful if they legitimately cared about it.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 11 pts · 239d
Tried that yesterday, 2.6 GB for just that one tab playing a twitch stream. That's honestly impressive.
Lawnman23@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 239d
Keeping it positive, nice.
BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 238d
In the world of AI vibe coding, I don't think so, they will push people even more towards web apps I think
relativestranger@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 237d
that would require the software companies to actually spend money on competent developers instead of tossing peanuts at prompt writers.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 65 pts · 239d
Large computing will exist solely in the cloud where you will pay a subscription for it. Can't have these grubbing consumers buy anything we elites don't get a monthly cut of.
I wish this was sarcasm.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 239d
I am honestly not sure if that's a bad thing aside from the capitalism of it all. Almost all tasks normal people do could be done with a 10 year old computer running Linux.
I will find it hilarious if this RAM pricing issue causes people to move to Linux rather than have slow ass Windows 11.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 238d
I'm positive its a bad thing. It will mean the end of ownership. Our children will be born and their only worth with be as consumers for which they can crushed for any reason the owners see fit. Its slavery and feudalism nothing more nothing less.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 237d
Vasectomy
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 237d
Sounds like a really good decision for you.
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social · 62 pts · 239d
It's neat that AI is already ruining the world in really tangible ways.
Scrollone@feddit.it · 56 pts · 238d
8 GB of RAM would be enough if every fucking application didn't use Electron.
sudoer777@lemmy.ml · 20 pts · 238d
Or web applications, Firefox/Chrome uses like 32 GB RAM and constantly crashes my computer because of it
sexy_peach@feddit.org · 2 pts · 237d
Not for me on linux
sibachian@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 238d
thank you. came here to say this.
or, well, it also doesn't play well with ARM, i.e. on macbooks the ram isn't the bottle neck, its the CPU struggling with electron despite objectively being faster than x86 equivalents.
Arghblarg@lemmy.ca · 53 pts · 239d
Soldered in, or upgradeable at least? The former would be a huge reason to never buy the newest gen of laptops.
EDIT: Missed in article, yeah this would suck if they stick to soldered RAM for ultra-thins.
ThisGuyThat@lemmy.world · 43 pts · 239d
Those soldered low RAM ones are going to be in the dump a lot sooner.
Zephorah@discuss.online · 15 pts · 239d
They do not care about the planned obsolescence of it all.
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 7 pts · 239d
They absolutely do care. It's a bonus for them.
ThisGuyThat@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 239d
Easier to justify making trash.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 239d
Literally manufactured for the garbage dump.
doboprobodyne@mathstodon.xyz · 5 pts · 239d
@ThisGuyThat @Arghblarg
Excellent. Hopefully some of them will have hardware that supports #openBSD that I can pick up for pennies on the dollar. I believe the #thinkpad x1 carbon is already on soldered RAM. I can see many in the #Linux crowd stand to profit handsomely from this, given their much more broad hardware support 😜
#frugalComputing #BSD #recycle
ThisGuyThat@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 239d
Cheap homelab.
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 239d
lmao of course it's gonna be soldered in to push you to higher tiers
Chronographs@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 239d
Probably single channel too because of course
tym@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 238d
DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 238d
"WHY IS IT SO SLOW?!?!?!"
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 44 pts · 239d
Time to switch to Linux people lol. Windows is barely usable on 8GB these days.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 10 pts · 239d
And set up ZRAM.
NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 238d
ZRAM is real. Even on computers with lots of ram it lets the os compress and tuck away memory that a process is hoarding. When I start using android studio all these long-running election process get 1/2 their memory swapped out to disk, and evidently they never really needed it because days later I still see lots of their memory swapped out.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 239d
What's ZRAM?
tal@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 239d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zram
One of the mechanisms for compressing memory in Linux. Trades CPU time for effectively having more RAM Recent versions of Fedora apparently have it on by default.
I've read that zswap, another mechanism, is preferable on newer systems with NVMe/SSD, where paging isn't as painful; that only compresses pages going to swap, but requires that you actually have some swap. I haven't used either.
Probably someone should try benchmarking them for various workloads if systems are going to be running on much less memory for a while. Was more of an edge case thing that not many people cared about, but if operating with less memory is suddenly more important, might have broader interest.
On Linux, also possible to opt for lighter-on-memory versions of a lot of software that you're kinda committing to using the Microsoft-provided version of on Windows. File browser, compositor, etc.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 238d
Most everything on the desktop is going to be light on ram except the web browser and electron apps (i.e. web browsers). Games use a lot too, but thats less of an issue because you don't tend to multitask as much with games. Using onetab or some other way of limiting browser tabs severely helpa a lot.
InFerNo@lemmy.ml · 44 pts · 239d
Let's see how this plays out with windows 11 😄
thejml@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 239d
Swap is a thing. It'll kinda suck, but not as much as it would have pre-nvme. Except that now there's an nvme shortage... and an SSD shortage.
Ugh, I guess I'll just put Windows 2000/ME on there to complete the retro look.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 239d
One is good, but slower, the other is more buggy than 98SE, but a bit faster. Not much in common between them other than year.
tal@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 239d
I don't think that the NVMe shortage is that big of a deal in terms of using it for swap. It's much cheaper than DRAM per GB. You don't need that much.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 239d
You could technically boot it… Not for long, and don’t open anything, but still counts, right?
Pika@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 239d
concidering they were shipping windows 11 systems on 4 gigs of ram and selling it, I expect it won't change much. They worked like shit but they still sold. You make it cheap enough people will buy it regardless of flaws or speed.
TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 239d
Often the people that buy those tiers of computers don't know enough about memory to know how limited they'd be.
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca · 40 pts · 238d
better start removing AI from Windows then... holy fucj my 16gb is barely holding up with windows11 that in forced to use on my work PC. slow as BALLS, it's just raping the entire system performance constantly
Cryxtalix@programming.dev · 12 pts · 238d
I wonder what's going to happen to the electron frontends if machines are bottlenecked by ram so bad. Wasn't facebook just planning to switch whatsapp's frontend to webview as well? And win11's desktop is electron too. Everyone was acting like ram is unlimited.
TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 238d
Don't worry, you'll just need to subscribe to My Windows Copilot Cloud+ to get access to a virtual PC with plenty of RAM from anywhere! It'll be powerful enough you'll barely notice us logging all your actions and blocking anything we don't like.
whoisearth@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 238d
I have win11 on a work surface laptop pro with 16gb and I'm consistently at 15+GB used. This is corporate bloat. How do I know? I have a personal surface pro 6 with win11 and 16gb and it runs like a breeze.
Corporate bloat is such bullshit.
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 238d
whoisearth@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 238d
Security is all theatre. When NIST says make secure passwords and never change them but your fortune 500 infosec policy tells you to rotate your password every 30 days?
LOL
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 238d
SavageCoconut@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 238d
Does NIST actually said that? Secure pwd+no change it?
whoisearth@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 238d
Yes. Pwd change should only be on evidence of compromise assuming you have made a secure password.
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 238d
tbf a lot of that crap is mandated by insurance compliance requirements
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 238d
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 238d
no, but it isn't necessarily the fault of whom you might think it is that there needs to be 2 or 3 other ram hogs installed
COASTER1921@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 238d
Company computers often come with pre-installed spyware which is notoriously RAM hungry. My company laptop immediately after boot uses nearly a full 16gb before you open any programs. Luckily our IT department realizes this and only allows us to purchase machines with 32GB and up. They're probably not happy with the current prices, but being a F500 company they can afford it...
TheOakTree@lemmy.zip · -8 pts · 238d
...do we really need to use the word "raping" to talk about PC performance or can we agree that there are a hundred other words that fit better in that spot?
EDIT: Wooo free downvotes. Y'all are a bunch of snowflakes. I tried to make a point on behalf of others, since there are people who have traumatic lived experience with the concept of "rape" and would probably prefer not to be reminded of it. Nobody serious about computing is going to go out and say "this process is raping the performance" because it's just not a good idea. I bet you (if in tech field) wouldn't say it in front of your boss. But sure, call me sensitive and pull out a semantic argument.
I can smell you through your screen. Go take a shower and try being human.
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 238d
you're limiting your interpretation of rape to a single definition. there are multiple, and this certainly fits as one
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 237d
sometimes facing fears is a better way to overcome problems. hiding or making everyone avoid things that bother you or were a traumatic experience doesn't help anyone.
I used this word because it's definition applys to the scenario. It's the act of pilaging and plundering of my system resources by microsoft and other monitoring tools with no recourse but to abandon them. rape is a perfectly fine word to use. if it was strictly limited to sexual acts, I wouldn't have used it.
edit: I use this word at work too and have no issues with it both verbally and written. moreso verbally because people can't apply multi definitions of words and always assume 1 main definition
Buffy@libretechni.ca · 0 pts · 238d
I know it's hard, but you'll get through this. One day at a time, step by step, things will get easier. Some days it might not feel like you're making any progress; Some days you'll feel like you're moving backwards. But time heals all wounds. You've got this, eventually you won't even remember their comment existed. Stay. Strong. Keep fighting.
TheOakTree@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 238d
Hah. I never even said the comment hurt me.
I'm just speaking on behalf of those who have been hurt. If you can't recognize why someone might do that, you're either a rape apologist or you're an incel troll. Probably both.
Buffy@libretechni.ca · 1 pts · 237d
Its going to be okay. We all run from our feelings sometimes.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 38 pts · 239d
Does midrange being at 8GB mean that entry level will be 4GB? because I know corpos are gonna be corpos.
(I don't think windows even run at 4GB lmfao)
Edit: Also, this RAM shortage might force people to use Linux 😁
phaedrus@piefed.world · 7 pts · 239d
Seems to me like there will be a split. A lot of critical thinkers that are frugal will move to Linux and up its market-share, but there will also be a lot of deals that companies make with cloud computing platforms as well for their employees instead of purchasing new laptops (which will probably also allow them to cut back on their IT staff).
Those that are still lost when it comes to tech from 20 years ago will also buy into cloud compute platforms just because they use it at work and can't be arsed to learn something slightly different.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 239d
I wonder how long it will take before people realize it's cheaper to own your own hardware than lease compute time from a cloud provider? I've seen this same cycle with cloud VMs, I expect this will be no different.
phaedrus@piefed.world · 2 pts · 238d
They won't, ever. Not the general public, at least. Most are still perfectly content and onboard with paying for 10 different streaming services for music/movies/TV. Only immediate numbers mean anything, and $5/mo is better than $10 once, simply because 10 is larger than 5. Plus, look at all this extra shit I didn't want that is included!
IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 238d
With cloud computing you get someone (or at least some entity) to blame when things go wrong which apparently has some value too. Also, if you don't need a lot of resources cloud can be cheaper than setting up whole infrastructure by yourself, but that has a ton of variables. Plus with cloud there's often option for colocation/high availability/ddos protection and other stuff around which can be pretty expensive to build yourself.
Obviously if you try to shoehorn your current modrate sized esx/hyper-v/whatever environment to the cloud as is, that's going to be expensive.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 238d
Yeah, my experience has been in the MSP space for small to medium companies. We've had tons of customers forego upgrading local hardware to go to a cloud provider, then have to do it in reverse a few years later when they realize they've already paid out the cost of their hardware and licensing agreement in hosting costs, and still have to keep paying to run the same systems.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 238d
Yeah, this could spell the end for local installs of Microsoft office. Gdocs and o365 for everyone. Not sure if thats a win or loss.
phaedrus@piefed.world · 4 pts · 238d
I see it wholly as a loss, because it advances the idea of subscriptions for anything and everything, and Microsoft will be right there on the front lines taking advantage of the new revenue stream (so losing local installs won't hurt them at all and is what they're going for).
tal@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 239d
Windows 11 can run on 4GB. That's the minimum for the listed requirements, and the other day, I saw Best Buy selling a 4GB model, and I see some systems for sale online. I would imagine that it's not ideal.
christmas_cavalier@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 239d
I have seen a few of them. Yes they are bad. Basically idles at 85% memory usage on the desktop with nothing open.
ptu@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 239d
Windows going Vista again
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 239d
Windows 11 for me boots using around 7GB. Open a heavy browser tab or two and you're page thrashing next. I can't use a computer like that.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 239d
If I recall that 4GB min on win11 is explictedly with no applications. Including browsers.
It's only the os.
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 239d
Even on an 8gb or 16gb system Windows uses over 4gb on a fresh boot. At 4gb it's going to be swapping to fish non-stop. The disk will be thrashed and be dead in a year of use.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 239d
That 'can' does a hell of a lot of heavy lifting. But then again, it says Windows can run in 4GB, it doesn't say anything about your apps.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 238d
Im really surprised Microsoft hasn't already come out with a chrome-os like neutered version of windows specifically for this.
notthebees@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 238d
They did for education purposes.
relativestranger@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 237d
'entry level' specs have been 4gb ram for over a decade, and they're still selling shit-tier laptops with only that today.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 37 pts · 238d
8 GIGABYTES!!? How am I supposed to load a mouse driver in THAT!?
CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 238d
You don't need to load the mouse driver on your laptop. We have a subscription service for it!
REDACTED@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 238d
GeForce now
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 238d
Cool! Is the scroll wheel split into up and down services?
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 237d
5 cents per scroll. Because pennies are over.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 237d
Seems reasonable. Can I buy left and right click separately as monthly subscriptions?
Boy was I wrong about modern computing, it's all so powerful and useful!
bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 238d
We'll trim it down so the mouse driver only has a little AI.
bytesonbike@discuss.online · 4 pts · 238d
You can have a little AI, as a treat
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online · 1 pts · 237d
laughs in MS-DOS
DupaCycki@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 239d
This wouldn't be much of an issue if most of the laptops nowadays didn't come with soldered in ram and no options of expanding.
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 239d
Exactly. Give me two slots and I don't care if the base model comes with 64kb, that problem will be fixed before I even switch the thing on for the first time.
ragas@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 239d
I boycott those.
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com · 5 pts · 239d
So it remains shit quality even if RAM gets more affordable at some reasonable point in the future.
tal@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 239d
Apparently there are m.2 NVMe drives with DRAM caches.
I don't know if anyone makes a pure DRAM NVMe drive --- it'd forget its contents every boot --- but if so, on Linux, you could make the block device a swap partition.
tal@lemmy.today · 34 pts · 239d
My not-terribly-new phone has 12GB of memory, and I'm pretty sure that Android is a lot lighter on memory than the Windows 11 that I suspect a lot of these are going to be running.
Cypher@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 239d
tal@lemmy.today · 13 pts · 239d
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11-specifications
I think that OpenAI has probably kind of bashed a hole in the bottom of Microsoft's boat on the local AI stuff, if 8GB is going to be midrange.
prex@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 239d
But AI can download RAM.
/s
peskypry@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 239d
That too on ARM. Whereas modern applications on Windows (and Mac, Linux) even on high performance x86 sucks so much. Slack and Chrome are two of the worst pieces of software ever designed by humans.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 239d
Why not just tell me to go fuck myself and skip the unsatisfying foreplay?
Avicenna@programming.dev · 33 pts · 238d
lol lets fuck all other computational sciences so that people can generate cats drinking whiskey in robes de chambre.
anon_8675309@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 238d
For the price of 16GB?
Dremor@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 238d
More like for the price of 64GB.
Cort@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 238d
For the price of 32GB, if you're lucky. Hopefully it's 8gb in a single stick so upgrading is cheaper, even if that means single channel ram speeds out of the box
Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 238d
Oh you sweet summer child. It will almost surely be soldered to the board so that you'll have to pay extra upfront or buy a new laptop if you want more RAM.
Cort@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 238d
thatonecoder@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 239d
...and I'm still on 4 GB RAM, TROLOLOL
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 26 pts · 239d
You must be using Linux.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 239d
He also must not be a gamer. Or at least not one that understands years past 2003
thatonecoder@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 239d
Nope to both of you. Windows 10 and I play Minecraft 1.8.9.
arararagi@ani.social · 9 pts · 239d
So you have the patience of Buddha, that's great.
thatonecoder@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 238d
And I've spent some time optimizing the game, too: I even use Ornithe mod loader instead of Forge.
HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org · 6 pts · 239d
I am. I have 16 GB on my 15 year old eight-core PC, run virtual machines, and need barely half the RAM. My laptop is a Thinkpad T490 and is totally fine. My Linux phone runs fine with 5 GB right now.
Cryxtalix@programming.dev · 22 pts · 238d
What. My six year old cheapo Acer laptop that got my broke ass through college had 16gb ram. My raspberry pi has 8gb of ram.
artyom@piefed.social · 19 pts · 239d
And developers will make their shitty apps more resource-efficient, right? RIGHT!?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 239d
Perhaps. I've recently watched a video on historical coins and the quality of relief.
Things like Athenian tetradrachm were very rare, and thus done properly. The more and more numerous recognizable coins had to be (inflation ; for much of history in much of the world old or foreign money would be valid currency), the simpler were the designs. Medieval European mints had to make such amounts of coins, that they were very simple and streamlined.
So what this has to do with computing - building something in an empty place works differently than replacing\changing something in the middle of an old city. When computers were new, things worked differently than now, economically and socially.
It's possible that when this settles into something more stable, normal amounts of RAM for personal computers will again be in megabytes.
itsathursday@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 239d
The AI snake is finally eating its tail.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 238d
Will they solder it?
AceBonobo@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 238d
They'll solder 4gb. So even if RAM prices go down, you're still effffed
relativestranger@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 237d
there's a number of laptops already that do have 8gb on the board and no sodimm slots.
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 238d
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 238d
It's the web as it exists now. It can't be fixed gradually, or at least that's harder than to design from scratch a replacement with same abilities, but fewer levels of abstraction, less bloat, making a client application in reasonable time being possible. Probably with architecture and semantics centered around how social networks and messengers work, not just hypertext. Visiting a webpage and reading a group chat are different ideas, the latter doesn't imply connecting to one specific location. Again, that's something that was understood since Usenet. Just no public system like Usenet, but not morally obsolete, emerged to be popular.
anon_8675309@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 238d
Just go back to “native” apps and not all this web tech bloated crap.
uncouple9831@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 238d
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 237d
TheWilliamist@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 238d
Waaaayyy back in the day Dell had a real bad habit of limiting their low and midrange laptops to pitiful amounts of memory to stratify their product line even though the chipset might support more.
Rooty@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 238d
FTFY
user224@lemmy.sdf.org · 12 pts · 239d
I thought I'd be fine, that I'd buy the other 16GB stick later. Now is later, I am screwed. I had to enable the use of ALT-SysRq-f to manually invoke OOM-killer because I often run out of RAM.
8GB just feels like way too little for a new laptop. Well, maybe the absolutely cheap ones, but "mid-range", no.
It's crazy. A bit over a year ago I got a refurbished ThinkPad for €180 with 1x16GB of RAM. Now that RAM costs around €120.
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 239d
Since 2015 I was selling clients 16GB minimum. Too many performance issues with 8 on a majority of them. Last year I changed to 32GB minimum. 16 is not much for people who do a lot with their computer.
I mean, if you're running Linux it's a different story.
vividspecter@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 239d
Try zram or zswap since you're on Linux.
Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus · 12 pts · 239d
GenosseFlosse@feddit.org · 4 pts · 239d
Running windows 11 is already uncomfortable, but not for RAM reasons.
Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 239d
Windows 11 is actually unusable on 8GB RAM
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 239d
What do you mean? You can browse like one web page with 8GB of RAM. 😜
Evotech@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 237d
It’s not even going to run chrome my guys
Gsus4@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 238d
Shit, looks like the crazy stock bubble is starting to dwarf and eat into the consumer market instead of just bursting...
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 237d
Infect everything. Claim you need bailouts because everything has AI in it.
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 238d
Oh the irony that I have 16 GB RAM on my old Lenovo
BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 238d
I have 16 GB in my 2014 laptop that still serves as my daily driver. 8 GB twelve years later is a joke.
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 238d
I feel like old money, and I'm poor as fuck. What is this dark age of humanity?
Let's make our own RAM fab, and call it Lemmy inc!
Surp@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 238d
Back to windows xp for me!
themaninblack@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 238d
Weird way to spell Linux Mint
WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org · 6 pts · 237d
Apples going to come out with a 4gb phone and somehow still pitch it as a glorious innovation.
DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 238d
Welp, glad the old laptop physically broke last night and I bought a new one with 16gb on Xmas sale today.
Also glad I built a new PC last year. Not gonna be upgrading anything for the foreseeable future the way things are looking.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 238d
I... ok.
Am I an idiot, or... at least when it comes to system RAM...
Do you really need DDR5 RAM, instead of DDR4?
Like, say I have 32 GB or DDR4 vs 32GB of DDR5.
Beyond I guess crushing some benchmark software harder... what are the actual practical benefits of this?
For an average person?
What can I do with 32 gigs of DDR5 that I can't do with 32 gigs of DDR4? Or 16? Or 24?
BigDiction@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 238d
Typically the CPU and motherboard are both tied to a specific generation of RAM, which is keyed and traced differently on the motherboard for DDR 4 vs 5.
For example the current AMD socket AM5 requires DDR 5. You’d have to go back to AM4 Ryzen 5000 series for DDR 4 support.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 238d
I mean... I know that...
But my question still stands.
Ceteris paribus, keep as much else the same, same GPU, similar CPU by benchmark scores... swap the mobo and the sys ram...
What do you actually gain by going from DDR4 to DDR5, in total, end-state capabilities?
DDR5 is faster.
What kinda stuff actually needs that being faster, actually benefits from it?
sgh@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 238d
It's just the fact that, at some point, if you want a faster computer, you're bound to have DDR5.
AMD 5000 is fast, but how does it compare to last gen? Is there a 5000 CPU that can get the same score as a high end 9000 CPU?
What if you have a homelab server to upgrade but find out you need more PCIe lanes?
Other than that, yeah, you don't need DDR5, but DDR4 is slowly going out of production and is also rising in price... so you're screwed either way.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 238d
Alright, alright, that just took two people explaining it for it to sink in for me.
Thanks, I got too hung up on the specifics and missed the bigger picture.
phx@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
There are some in-between boards as well. I've an Intel 12th gen board that comes in DDR4 and DDR5 varieties. Either one will be an upgrade from an 11th gen, but it will be a bit faster with the DDR5 board.
Dremor@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 238d
IGPs are very dependant on memory speed. Many uses gains from faster memory speed (but I can't give you one out of memory), but most games gains more from memory latency than raw speed (with some exception, like Stellaris).
Usually, if your app is CPU heavy, you'll gain from RAM speed.
COASTER1921@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 237d
All web browsers are nearly unusable with 4gb of RAM lately. Even with desktop Linux I usually have nearly my full 8gb used. With 8gb AND Windows it's only a matter of time before these computers become unusable...
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 238d
Meanwhile my ThinkPad L440 will soon receive an upgrade to 16 GB of RAM. (I wonder if I can get a CPU upgrade to a Core i7)
ChokingHazard@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 238d
This is not limiting mid-range laptops. This is making more low-range laptops. Just because you’re making more lower tiered laptops doesn’t mean the midrange adjusts as mid-range is based on specs/performance. This is basic taxonomy.
The average laptop produced by these 2 manufacturers will see a decrease in specs.
mlg@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 237d
zswap and zram
becoming highly critical software againtrying to shove your fat 16Gb allocated application into 8Gb of RAM with room to spare:ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online · 3 pts · 237d
I bought a 64gb desktop in late 2024, in addition to many other expensive features. They can kiss my ass.
Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 239d
Hasn’t Dell had a bit of a rough patch with they’re laptops lately?
It would seem like absorbing this RAM shit storm would help out their image right now.
relativestranger@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 237d
dell's been going down the crapper for at least a decade..... ever since dell and the vultures took it private ~ 2013.
Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 237d
I have an XPS 13 9310 OLED that's been pretty great so I personally don't have issues with Dell. IMHO Dell also makes pretty good panels my U3023E has been color accurate and a dependable hub for all my computers.
Engywuck@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 239d
Lenovo being Apple.
Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 238d
and cant we just put fucking ddr4 or ddr3 on it? why does it got to be bleeding edge all the time?
kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 237d
Lol, forget a browser, is that even enough to run Windows 11 well?
(In before jokes about windows 11 ever running "well")
cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 239d
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 239d
🙄
ekZepp@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
I may limit myself from buying one as well.
fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 237d
angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 238d
Just give me DDR4 then.
Cort@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
Sorry. New processors only use ddr5. You'll have to buy something used (or low end old-stock) if you want ddr4
angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 238d
I just did a new build with DDR4 because I was panicked about rising costs, and I don't think the Ryzen 7 5800X counts as low end, or at least it didn't when it was new. You're probably right about it being old stock though, and none of this is relevant to laptops.
Cort@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 238d
I just wish AMD would bring another x3d chip into production for am4