SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a month
https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-stock-drops-new-low-ipo-price-starship-launch-scrubbed-2026-7
https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-stock-drops-new-low-ipo-price-starship-launch-scrubbed-2026-7
137 Comments
kmirl@lemmy.world · 157 pts · 30d
I don't know how anyone fell for this pump and dump scheme in the first place.
chocrates@piefed.world · 86 pts · 30d
I do :(. I'm also worried about which of my 401ks bought in to it too
hayvan@piefed.world · 38 pts · 29d
That's the most outrageous part. The most obviously fraudulent company being given fast track to
s&p 500 (although I just read that decision was overturned)NASDAQ100 just reeks of corruption.EDIT: thanks for the correction. I don't know much about USA or their economic stuff.
SirHaxalot@nord.pub · 25 pts · 29d
It was NASDAQ100 that let SpaceX in. S&P 500 stayed true to their rules which includes waiting at least 1 year after IPO to include it in the portfolio
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works · -76 pts · 30d
I mean you choose your investments for your 401(k). Maybe it is time to learn about which funds you’re invested in and make sure they’re appropriate for your time horizon and risk tolerance.
gibmiser@lemmy.world · 102 pts · 30d
Hey you condescending asshole, they literally changed the rules to allow this into the indexes.
mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works · -21 pts · 30d
Fermion@feddit.nl · 74 pts · 30d
401(k) is managed by the employer and you can only pick from the funds they have selected. That really doesn't leave much choice for most people.
That's why people should consider doing a rollover into IRA anytime they have a job change and not just rollover into the new employer's 401(k).
Pacattack57@lemmy.world · -35 pts · 30d
It’s not like it’s stocks. It’s index funds and you can get a list of the funds offered. I don’t think I’ve ever seen an index fund that included SpaceX
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus · 41 pts · 30d
Broad-market funds like the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and the iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) include SpaceX.
SpaceX was added to the Nasdaq-100, meaning funds that track it, such as the Invesco QQQ ETF, hold the stock.
Benchmarks like the Russell 1000 also hold SpaceX, automatically populating funds like the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB)
https://www.investopedia.com/spacex-stock-joins-major-index-funds-what-regular-investors-need-to-know-spcx-ipo-vanguard-blackrock-vti-itot-12004764
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 30d
I'm not even American and even I know that the level of corruption involved in the SpaceX IPO means that even people who want nothing to do with SpaceX had their investments tied up in SpaceX.
Smaile@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 30d
i monitor my father investing habits to make sure he doesn't fall for shit like this, their have been a few times iv been worried to say the least...
corey931@lemmy.wtf · 4 pts · 29d
Fanboys
chocrates@piefed.world · 4 pts · 29d
Man before Elon was a public figure it was so easy to fanboy. Reusable rockets is an insane feet of human engineering. At least now we have some competition in the space.
I know that it was the talented engineers at SpaceX doing that engineering and huge publicity subsidies, but it felt like a step forward.
Why can't Elon just leave SpaceX alone.
hayvan@piefed.world · 4 pts · 29d
It's unfortunately bigger than just the suckers being suckered. These things also get pumped a lot by "early investors", whose strategy is to get the stock immediately and sell quickly to take adventage of the initial surge. They increase the demand a lot and contribute to that surge.
SirMaple__@lemmy.ca · 71 pts · 30d
blargh513@sh.itjust.works · 52 pts · 30d
wirebeads@lemmy.ca · 50 pts · 30d
Seeing musk fail makes me giddy. Seeing people who dumped and lost their money on him makes me giddier. FAFO
the_tab_key@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 30d
Unfortunately, a lot of people didn't have a choice in the matter.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
A lot of Americans voted for this clown, remember? And most of those voters were fine when DOGE destroyed the lives of many. Now it‘s their turn to pay up. Let this be a lesson for Americans. Subscribing into an ideology of selfishness and hatred comes at a cost for society.
the_tab_key@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 29d
And a lot of Americans didn't vote for this clown, remember? Those are still being punished with this bullshit.
Eheran@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 30d
?
naught101@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 30d
Your money in savings and insurance and superannuation funds is often reinvested in shit like this.
It's worth dropping yours an email and asking whether they do or not..
Kr4u7@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 29d
The 401k that americans use also automatically invested in it if they didnt opt out iirc
pishadoot@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 29d
There isn't a single 401k that Americans use. 401k is an index fund, an investment vehicle. I'm sure many included SpaceX but plenty did not.
And as an individual you can't really "opt out" of individual stocks in the fund. You could roll all of your investment into a different fund that doesn't include the stock you don't want, but I don't know of any broker that allows people to pick and choose which stocks they want to use in their 401k. You give them money, they manage the fund, that's how it goes.
naught101@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Oh, I hadn't clocked until now that 401(k)s are a pension fund. I guess that means they are basically the same as superannuation.
HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 29d
Mine is invested in the UK with a focus towards sustainability and green energy, so I am safe. Plus I don't really care much if it doesn't go negative. Just want to pay off my mortgage and then stop working much.
naught101@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
Mine is also in a nominally ethical fund, but they still invest in e.g. nvidia. Not sure about spaceX though
SirHaxalot@nord.pub · 7 pts · 29d
Shorting the stock and making money on your own when Musk fails
(This is not financial advice. In fact it’s very dangerous as Musks companies often perform irrationally)
underscores@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 29d
(This is not financial advice. In fact it's very dangerous as Musk's companies stocks are manipulated and rigged manually)
ftfy
timestatic@feddit.org · 41 pts · 30d
Data centers in space are frankly a ridiculous idea. Can't believe so many wanted in on the IPO. They have cool tech, but nothing that would warrant such a high evaluation for now and the foreseeable future.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 32 pts · 30d
Full self driving datacenters in space
Mihies@programming.dev · 12 pts · 29d
With a hyperloop link between them
Thorry@feddit.org · 5 pts · 29d
You see the internet is like a bunch of tubes
sundray@lemmus.org · 3 pts · 29d
Oh no, look out ISS!
*SMASH*
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 29d
That's because it was severely over valued for a company that produces no product and makes no profit.
To be fair it was a solid pump and dump.
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
You mean creating a worldwide communication system that has to be completely relaunched every half decade that is the exact opposite of profitable isn't sustainable!?
weew@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 29d
Actually the Starlink division itself is profitable.
The unprofitable part is Twitter and xAI which got merged in right before the IPO.
SpaceX was actually on the path to being quite profitable, but then Musk tried to hide his two biggest money sinks inside it.
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
Profitable like Tesla? That is not actually profitable without a big chunk (like a third) of their money from government subsidies.
https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117956/documents/HMKP-119-JU00-20250226-SD003.pdf
It appears SpaceX may not be as highly leveraged with the government with only 20% of its total revenue from government contracts.
It is interesting to look this up but ultimately what I mean is long term profitability considering they will have to continuously replace their satellites every 5-10 years.
The combining of his companies is a whole other level of fuckery that regulators should have smacked down instantly, but you know reality.
Folstar@lemmus.org · 37 pts · 29d
We ain't seen nothing yet. In 2-3 weeks the Q2 report will release at which 20% of stocks held by employees will be unlocked, which has hit even profitable and not-fantasy-based companies hard in the past. There will also be a wave of resignations from people who cash out and if that takes key people then investors back off even further. My guess is fElon wants the stock to stay high until next summer when he can sell, but he NEEDS it to stay high until November when early investors can cash out. He has borrowed billions from people you wouldn't want to owe $1 and been delaying and juggling for a few years with tacking together this SpaceX nonsense amalgamation.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 29d
When you consider the kind of life changing amounts of money even a few thousand shares sell for at current rates, they'd be crazy not to.
It's fallen maybe 12% since the IPO. You're talking about shares that were trading for a few bucks during the original debt offerings. Marc Andressen has something like a 6000% ROI on his holdings even at current prices.
If this company dropped by 50%, it would still be worth in the $800B range. There's no world in which current shareholders don't make fuckoff amounts of profit. The only question is whether we're talking nine figures or ten.
Folstar@lemmus.org · 7 pts · 29d
50% might prove optimistic. The rules that were bent for SpaceX exist for reasons. The August dump will be 4X the shares already in the wild. You are right, employees would be crazy not to sell at current rates. SpaceX employees are probably smart and/or educated enough to read the white papers on all these science fantasy projects and know they are pure fantasy. Cool stuff to fire up investment bros, but not the kind of thing they want to be tasked with trying to make reality. Point being, the floor for what an employee would not sale is going to be really low. True believers might hold, but anyone who smells the BS or just likes money will gleefully sell at 50% of current.
Meanwhile, China is making great strides in VTVL and much cheaper, open source LLMs. The EU is eager to find home grown or at the least not-American tech solutions. Every headline makes SpaceX look less and less likely to make ANY profits, let alone completely dominate supposedly multi-trillion dollar markets.
wewbull@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 29d
SpaceX employees are probably not happy about being used as a dumping ground for an AI black hole company. I expect many are counting the days until they can leave.
jj4211@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 28d
Even if they did believe in the possibilities, they are likely eager to offload in favor of a more diversified investment strategy.
Most folks I know that even think their company is in decent enough shape sell off RSUs quick as they can because they broadly don't trust having a bunch in a single company stock. Especially if that stock collapsing would likely correlate with them losing their paycheck too.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
So, from 1% of market cap to 2%?
Spread over shareholders who still hold north of 90% of the company?
China (and India and Brazil, among others) are all making huge investments in aerospace. The EU is certainly making a lot of noise, but because everything is privatized to fuck, what you're left with is guess like Richard Branson paddin wallets while programs like the FCAS flounder.
Starlink is still the modern word in satellite communication. That's worth a few hundred billion on it's face.
Will this advantage last? Idk. Probably not, but maybe.
At a minimum, if you want to be friendly with America, you'll need to buy from Musk.
Folstar@lemmus.org · 3 pts · 29d
Starlink, which is nowhere near worth that much even under a best case scenario (compare to other comm companies), can make money and SpaceX still not make any profits because of the the xAI money pit. Also, no, the advantage will not last. The last 30 years of satellite communications have been one seemingly promising idea after another that fizzled out or was made obsolete. No reason to think that trend will change now, especially not when the Starlink model is extremely resource intensive.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
The existing network plus whatever Elon Musk can launch in the next twenty years, assuming an absence of competition could be a trillion dollar company. When you've got a monopoly on military satellite technology in a market full of warring super states, that's a lot of economic leverage.
I'm deeply skeptical that he'll have that edge for long. But I can at least interesting someone who thinks it's worth a gamble.
jj4211@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 28d
The existing network will be gone within a few years. By design. If all goes well for SpaceX, it will have been replaced by a new network, which will also be gone within a few years.
Just pointing out that the existing network can't be relied upon without continued re-investment constantly. It's hard to build up a strong first mover advantage when the fruits of the effort burn up in the atmosphere routinely.
Folstar@lemmus.org · 1 pts · 28d
And that no one comes up with a better tech and extending it out 20 years for... reasons. Sure. Ok. Trillion dollar company under those very reasonable assumptions.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 28d
Musk's done an excellent job of cornering the market in a few other sectors, EVs most notably. You'll notice how all the other American firms and even a few of the Japanese and Korean companies are bowing out and running away.
I'm not saying its a safe bet. But it's not as unreasonable as you might think.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 29d
Who is going to pay the money for there to be a reasonable return on that value? I don't have Starlink, I have no need for it, since there's a cable coming into where I live. Sure there's people that live in remote places that it's useful for. But that's not a lot of people.
There are military applications, but Musk is a flake not military wants to be dependent on him. Every country in the world is spending a lot of money to end their dependence on the US defense industrial complex, so there will be alternatives for military purposes.
Maybe it can work in vehicles? But if the price is too high people will just use 5G or just go without access for a while.
Starlink is just a product to fill in some edge cases. It will probably make a steady profit, but there will be competition from Europe and China before too long.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
Government militaries, mostly. The Pentagon and it's NATO allies, militaries across the Pacific Rim, Ukraine, etc.
jj4211@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 28d
Well some of the shareholders, clearly none of the peope who had to wait for the IPO are going to make some unless they managed to sell off in the 4 days after IPO.
Beyond that, we don't know that much about the pre-IPO costs and how low it can go for them to still make out like bandits.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 28d
Fully unironically know a few folks who did exactly that. Got in at $135 and sold on the way up to $200, because it's insane to hold a company with a P/E of... 1000x? Something stupid like that.
We know what firms like Thiel's Founder's Fund and Andressen Horowitz paid for minority positions during the earlier funding rounds (Series A -J and assorted debt swaps). And we also know what a few of the outsider funds - EchoStar, for instance - paid for advanced shares shortly before the public offering. There were definitely some deals that were worse than others (the July 2025 Tender at $212/share was EchoStar, the December 2025 Tender at $421/share was to the company's own employees as well as some other earlier investors).
Even then, the volume of shares sold was miniscule compared to shares outstanding.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 28d
Here's what Musk is sitting on, as well as Shotwell.
https://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1181412.htm
wewbull@feddit.uk · 0 pts · 29d
Is that going to be 20% of stock held by each employee can be sold, or 20% of employees can sell their stock?
If it's the latter then yes, I can see them cashing out and leaving.
Folstar@lemmus.org · 2 pts · 29d
20% of all stocks, specifically those held by employees.
wewbull@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 28d
That doesn't make sense so I went and looked it up.
So each employee can sell 20% of their stock (probably options, but since they've had an "Employee Share Purchase Plan" (ESPP) some will hold actual shares). If 80% of someone's holdings are dependent on them staying at SpaceX I doubt many will leave after selling 20%.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 28d
Who would be crazy not to dump
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 27 pts · 30d
It’s fun to laugh at the worst people taking Ls, until one realises that the insiders got to sell up early, leaving retail investors holding the bag, and that these involve not just eminently punchable Musk-idolising incel chuds or even FOXNews grandpas but ordinary working stiffs with pension funds and savings. Chances are everything went exactly to plan and even as Musk lost his very brief trillionaire status, he managed to cash out a lot of his virtual wealth.
timestatic@feddit.org · 20 pts · 30d
No, thats just not true. At IPO date there were already many critical voices about the stock being way overvalued for what they charge at IPO. "Insiders" means there was info that was withheld or the public didn't know about. Anyone who bought this stock at IPO asking price was just foolish enough to buy into the hype.
Lemming6969@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 28d
There's a reason things like consumer protection agencies should exist. Most are too stupid and easily taken advantage of. You cannot run a society like that well. SpaceX already raised their funds and the bag holders are regular people. That is bad for society even if we may like to point and laugh at the morons.
timestatic@feddit.org · 1 pts · 28d
There is a reason you shouldn't trade individual stocks if you're unwilling to research a bit at least. If you trade individual stocks without it it becomes basically gambling. I'm not laughing at the ordinary people losing money, but I also don't feel very bad for them in particular.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 3 pts · 29d
The planet is too fucked for me to care about dumb people's money.
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz · 22 pts · 29d
Is musk the first person to lose 1 trillion dollars? Quite the honor.
Vlyn@lemmy.zip · 21 pts · 29d
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 30d
…so far!
ulkesh@piefed.social · 20 pts · 29d
Good. Maybe one day the investors will see this idiot for what he is: a greedy racist fascist. And stop investing in his bullshit.
tabris@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 29d
They won't do that. They're also greedy racist fascists. That's what capitalism is.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 29d
They don‘t care about the racist fascist part but he‘s also a massive fraud who build his empire on short legged lies. It‘s simply irresponsible to believe that guy.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 29d
he can drop still further
Reygle@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 28d
brachiosaurus@mander.xyz · 15 pts · 29d
This is the sort of news that achieve nothing and only give this guy visibility
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 29d
Sell side stock news is usually made to help retail investors lose money. They will pile on to this thing for a few more weeks then reverse it back up to 3 trillion. Rinse wash repeat. And you have infinite money generator 2.0
corey931@lemmy.wtf · 4 pts · 29d
Insider trading 101 right here
NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net · 15 pts · 29d
He's such a loser not even his stock wants to hang around with him
Faithless@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 29d
Sadly Here, hé is not a loser. Things happened exactly the way he wanted to. He won big, his idiot fans lost bigger
NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 29d
I wont dispute that he certainly benefited from being able to buy entire countries and pay off any regulatory agency he didnt go at with an axe, but I think we all lost out as a result, not just his fanboys
mo_lave@reddthat.com · 14 pts · 29d
Prime wallstreetbets material
FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 29d
Indeed lol, I should have shorted Spacex
someguy3@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 30d
New low is going to become a common phrase for space x. Boldly going where no stock has gone before.
crank0271@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
Hopefully the stock needs a Boring Machine.
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 30d
I assure you, many stocks have gone much much lower. It's called "penny stocks". They're exactly what they sound like. They're mostly used as pump and dump schemes. Company is worth $0.01 per stock? Buy $10,000 dollars worth. Then, when it eventually becomes worth $0.02, you sell, and make an easy $10,000. Repeat every few days.
someguy3@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 30d
Put the two sentences together. Then realize it's also a joke.
Smaile@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 30d
good, we knew it was bloat but it was still annoying af listening to people go "wow a trillionire", fucking wealth glazer are garbage people 9/10 times.
ddplf@szmer.info · 4 pts · 29d
This leaves a room for the assumed 10% non-garbarge billionaire-stans, and I'm wondering what set of traits would such a person have, other than being an absolute boot-sucking loser.
ripcord@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 30d
The majority of people who have bought SpaceX stock are now down at LEAST 18% in value.
dickalan@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 29d
I bought a dollar of it just to track it and now it's worth $.80
eicker@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 29d
The irony is that Musk himself has already cashed out enormous wealth over the years: Whether the stock jumps or drops today barely changes his position. The people really feeling the pain are the retail investors who treated him like an infallible genius instead of managing their own risk.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 29d
Its everything I hoped for.
abc@suppo.fi · 11 pts · 29d
I considered buying it when the IPO was but didn't.
Now I'm looking at the comments here and I'm thinking that perhaps now is the time. Lemmy is usually the number one investment source. Just do the exact opposite what people are saying here and you'll be rich.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 28d
You want to play meme stocks, you'll get better odds with gas station scratchers.
sanitation@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 29d
its about to be flooded with insider shares.my guess prices will go down to 30$
prime_number_314159@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 29d
80% of the time, they're wrong every time.
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 28d
The unlocks are coming soon, so I'd expect it to go even lower. If you are going to buy, the dip is what you want for sure.
formation@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 28d
Strangely correct
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 28d
Lemmy 100% predicted SPCX would tank. Not sure what you guys are reading.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 28d
IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 29d
And they're gonna sprinkle this into our index funds, yay!!
spicystraw@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 29d
Was this not the plan all along? I thought it was an open secret to open woth high price, let initial investors sell their shares. Let 401K and small-time investors buy it, up and take the fall.
wewbull@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 29d
Yep. AI has drained the venture capital well dry. So...
Net result:
explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 29d
Interesting and informative.
spectrums_coherence@piefed.social · 7 pts · 29d
What? A company that is making -5 billion net income lost 1 trillion in market value?!
jaykrown@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 29d
The word "value" here is really subjective.
FE80@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 28d
It's going to be interesting to see what happens to the stock price the next time SpaceX blows up a test rocket.
Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 28d
or china and russia start disabling them in orbit
Dogiedog64@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 29d
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 29d
How does one short a stock? Like what is the process? Do I need a special broker?
historicaldocuments@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 29d
Shorting a stock is a bad plan. You typically need collateral (cash, or a line of credit, or something) in case the short goes bad. Shorting a stock can have a theoretically infinite loss since if you buy a share of a company and it goes bankrupt, your maximum loss is the value of the share. Short selling means you've sold a share you don't own with a pinky swear that you'll buy one back to replace it. A stock likely won't, but could, go infinitely high. In that case you'd have infinite losses.
The other way is options trading. You can do this with your normal broker, possibly. You'll need to make statements about your income level, savings, risk tolerance, and check a box saying you've read some mandated documentation. The process can seem like click-through stuff for a normal website, but it's absolving the brokerage of fault if your decisions go bad.
Options work a little like an insurance contract. If you are worried that you're too heavily tilted towards a certain company (but still believe in the investment), you can buy "puts" that help mitigate the risk if the underlying security. A "call" is a contract that lets you hedge the other way. They let you get exposure to a security without having to purchase the shares. An options contract is a contract that gives you the right, but not the obligation to buy (call) or sell (put) some number (typically 100) of an underlying security by a certain date. Selling options naked is a topic better left for someone else to explain all the risks involved (and I covered a strategy that has infinite risk).
A call pays off if the stock shoots up before the contract expires, and a put pays off if the stock tanks. To do what you're saying you'd have to buy puts (I'm not an investment advisor, I'm not your investment advisor, this is not investment advice). If it sounds like gambling that's because it is. Everybody already had the idea to bet against SPCX. There are platforms out there that let you look and see without having to risk money, and that's probably the best course of action.
I picked the date September 18, 2026 at random. If you had a September 18 130P, then it went up 21.19% Friday, kudos. The "last price" field is PER SHARE, and the contract was probably for 100 shares, so that's $2030, meaning you had four figures on the line there. If none of that makes sense, if the activity in the volume field doesn't make sense, then it's better to sit it out. In that realm you're swapping your money for that contract, and someone else is swapping that contract for your (now their) money. If the contract expires out of the money, you lose.
Some resources:
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 29d
Thank you for the detailed analysis. I really want to... but the rational side of me says I shouldn't 😆.
historicaldocuments@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
I've seen a few news stories through the years where I thought the stock movement was out of whack with the underlying security, and options are a way to "bet" on that being right. It's cheap and easy to just watch. Almost every time I was wrong and only found out a few times why. That probably just means I'm bad at it.
A few more things to remember. If you look at the first link at the bottom of my post, there are ways to structure buying/selling the calls/puts so that you can have a strategy that pays off if the stock goes up, down, or stays the same. How to set those up and the math involved is beyond me. The other thing is that for every trade with options someone makes there's an entity on the other side of it. You might be buying a part of the leg of someone else's more complex trade where a big investment house is trying to manage their risk and keep it below a certain level.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/19/business/robinhood-suicide-alex-kearns/
Stay smart and safe, invest money you can afford to lose in products you understand.
AstralPath@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 29d
This is just gambling with extra steps. Thanks for the analysis and your time to write all that up, though.
aceshigh@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
There have been suicides from people who didn’t really understand how shorting works.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
You have 3 options. 2 are options. You can buy a put contract. You can sell a call contract, or you can just sell shares you don’t own. All of these require special permissions from your broken as they each come with their own fun risk profile.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 29d
If you think the whole stock market looks like a bubble right now, you could invest in commodities and wait for the crash indefinitely.
IMHO it's better to not trust the stock market at all. It's a big club and we ain't in it.
Jaysyn@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 28d
It was only ever worth that much to the absolute dumbest motherfuckers on the planet.
caboose2006@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 29d
I'd be celebrating this more if it wasn't the retail investors getting screwed
reksas@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 29d
to the core!
vegafjord@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 29d
hmm
krisevol@lemmus.org · 1 pts · 29d
So I have a question, for the people that want these stocks taxed at market value. What happens in this situation? Would the company and Elon get a refund from the government?
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 29d
I would say that they should just get taxed at what ever the price is on December 31 or January 01.
If you lose money you can claim it as a loss just as you would when you sell for a loss, up to a certain limit.
krisevol@lemmus.org · 0 pts · 29d
So if the buyers are wonting to buy at a hype price, you have to pay a ton in taxes on unrealized gains meaning you need to sell stock to cover the cost, and pay taxes on the sell, then next year when evaluations go to normal levels you get to write off losses from zero income because you didn't sell and want to keep your shares meaning you get nothing back?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 29d
These shares were issued at the rate of dollars. Nobody selling their shares at IPO lost money.
After that, for the poor fools at EchoStar who took a very late position just before IPO at $212/share? They've always been entitled to write off shares at a loss.
You don't get a refund per say, but you do get tax loss carryover. So, if you lost $1M last year and you made $1M this year, you can tell the IRS that it's a push and you earned nothing.
krisevol@lemmus.org · 1 pts · 29d
I think you have a free concepts incorrect. You can't write off the lose unless you sell, and you are capped at 3k a year loss write-off as an individual.
Also elon hasn't sold any shares so this isn't relevant to him. I'm taking about other that want Elon to pay taxes on unrealized gains. What do you do in a situation were he paid taxes on unrealized gains and the stock losses value. Do you get a refund?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 29d
You are taxed on your realized gains, absolutely. You can only write a maximum of $3k in losses off your total wages + investments income. But that's net losses. So, if you report a $50,000 gain and a $40,000 loss off two transactions in a year, you report a net $10,000 realized gain for the year as Schedule B (investment) income.
In the reverse scenario ($50k loss, $40k gain), you could deduct $3k from your wage income and start the following year with a $7k loss.
In an extreme example - $50M loss - you can spend the rest of your life writing down against it. This creates an incentive to overstate the value of property when you are writing it down in bankruptcy (a popular maneuver among the Trump clan).
krisevol@lemmus.org · -1 pts · 29d
I get all that but that didn't answer my question.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 29d
It’s going to keep dropping as original owners sell. I’m thinking it drops to 80 until it holds and sky rockets over the next few years
HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · 0 pts · 29d
Why would it go up? In the next few years they will be even more years behind on the Mars mission they were going to be launching almost a decade ago at this point.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 29d
I live near vandenburg Air Force base. They launch satellites all the time. They will make money
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 29d
So he's a minusaire now?
lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com · -1 pts · 29d
Guys, can we please to giving that our attention? That thing will go down, up, down, up, down, down, up, up, up and down. We do we talk and write about it? Ignore it...
Why are we making the mistake again and again to give assholes attention?
ricardoharvin@mstdn.social · -2 pts · 30d
@sanitation
Oops!
sanitation@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 30d