92% of American adults aren’t going to a doctor because they cannot afford it. The health insurance industry must be dissolved & all of its executives criminally prosecuted for murder, conspiracy, an…

Full title: 92% of American adults aren’t going to a doctor because they cannot afford it. The health insurance industry must be dissolved & all of its executives criminally prosecuted for murder, conspiracy, and treason.

961 points · 203 comments · view on lemmy.world

203 Comments

DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 101 pts · 4d (17 replies)

Can we please gets some socialism up in this bitch already?!

SippyCup@lemmy.world · 67 pts · 4d (9 replies)

They will never give it to you.

You will have to take it by force.

DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 4d (8 replies)

Actually the Luigi way. Trust me a couple or 10 dead easy to put some strain. They’re not in fear of their mortality.

Damage@feddit.it · -12 pts · 4d (7 replies)

You should read about the birth of fascism in Italy

SippyCup@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 4d

I'll keep it in mind not to try to rebuild the Roman empire while I advocate for extreme social reform.

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 6 pts · 4d (4 replies)

Which has nothing to do with this

Damage@feddit.it · -7 pts · 4d (3 replies)

If you followed my advice you'd realize it does

SippyCup@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 4d (2 replies)

Fascism in Italy had a lot more to do with nationalism than leftism, ultimately it wasn't really a leftist movement at all. I'm not sure if you're aware of the current state of the US but we already have an ethno-nationalism problem here, and it's exactly the thing we're trying to fight against.

Damage@feddit.it · -1 pts · 3d

Ok since y'all want to pick fights without trying to understand: fascism was a reaction to the growing leftist movements. It's called reactionism because that's what it does. Killing a few assholes won't solve anything except give rise to some variation of this.

The foundation for change like this is a cultural shift, otherwise all you'll get is some more repression.

DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

If facism is fuck the rich no one would complain about facism. But clearly its not.

djsiete@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 4d (6 replies)

Go take it? Aren't you Americans supposed to have it in your blood to combat tyranny?

M0oP0o@mander.xyz · 8 pts · 4d (2 replies)

HA! What a load of shit that all was.

Now it is just some weird brand of freedom^tm^ mixed with warm ideas of misplaced superiority.

FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Don't forget the racism and refusal to acknowledge that 'Murica was founded in genocide

djsiete@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 4d

Biggest load of horse shit ever uttered by man. Fuck America and Americans

SeventySeven@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 4d (1 reply)

They also have the biggest and most well equipped military in the world. I dont see it going well for the average citizen there. You're going to need a LOT of help for any type of resistance too. I don't think the average american has access to things like tanks or armored vehicles either. Maybe drone warfare would happen? Not a good outlook.

Now if you could somehow convince them all to stop working and make the economy come to a halt, that might make the elite class worried and be forced into reaching a resolution without violence. Doubt it could ever be that easy or simple though, and is just a pipe dream at this point. Americans might be screwed forever if they can't work together or agree on anything at all.

architect@thelemmy.club · 2 pts · 4d

The Iranians fucked up that big equipped military.

spitfire@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

It was to combat English, not tyranny.

melfie@lemmy.zip · 46 pts · 4d (3 replies)

A lot of times, you just get a big bill without them doing anything useful for you.

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Patient: "You misunderstand, the diagnosis isn't behind a lock, the medicine is."

Doctor: "Fair enough, I'll permanently label you as 'drug-seeking' and this isn't libel somehow."

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 4d

Which they have to keep an eye out for because doctors fell for drugmakers' lies and overprescribed addictive opiates while claiming they aren't addictive (which makes it even easier to get addicted).

Or they just use that as an excuse to not have to deal with an annoying case they can't flash diagnose and then get offended if a patient decides to do their own research because the doctors they see can't be bothered.

I always think back to the time my ex was trying to get a diagnosis for a rare condition that matched her weird symptoms very well. She got a new family doctor, a young new doctor, and he would always dismiss her when she brought up wanting a referral to a clinic that specialized in it so they could diagnose her or rule it out. One time I went with her, she brought it up again, he said he didn't think she had it, and all I did was ask what made him think this wasn't the case and he admitted he didn't know much about it and would do some reading. On her next appointment, she didn't even have to ask because it was as obvious to him that she probably had it as it had been to us, he just gave her the referral.

So his justification for dismissing her belief she might have that condition was jack shit, probably involving imagining House saying "it's never lupus" or something like that. Like yeah, rare conditions are rare but some doctors treat that as if it's impossible instead of rare and then don't even bother learning how to tell.

The Dunning Kruger effect seems to be particularly strong in the medical field. Though to be fair, they do have to deal with their share of idiots and liars, but it makes them jaded rather than sharp.

architect@thelemmy.club · 6 pts · 4d

This is why i stopped going.

Anachu@leminal.space · 38 pts · 4d (1 reply)

"shocking"? I feel like anyone living here could tell you this 💀

OpenStars@piefed.social · 11 pts · 4d

Yes, not "shocking" at all when literally everyone you know is doing this...

Edit: with the exception of Boomers on Medicare.

the_q@piefed.social · 32 pts · 4d

What's shocking is our inaction.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 22 pts · 4d (19 replies)

People pay a fortune in premiums, then another fortune in deductibles, before they can even use their insurance. Most families never actually get to that point unless they are "lucky" enough to have a family member who gets sick or injured badly enough to meet the deductible. Then you can finally use your insurance for the rest of the year.

We paid for years, and got literally nothing out of it, until I fell off a roof and got a bad concussion, and a big enough bill that our deductible was met. That was in September, so for the next few months we went to every doctor we needed, got every test we'd been putting off, etc. It was the only time we got full use of our insurance, so we took advantage of it, after paying in tens of thousands of dollars for years.

Medicare 4 All would give us full use of our insurance on January 1 every year, without having to worry about any deductibles. It might cost a couple of hundred extra dollars in taxes, but you'll save $600 month in health insurance premium, and $4500 per year in deductibles, so you'll come out far ahead, and have actual health insurance.

yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 4d (9 replies)

As an outsider seeing the US from the internet, can I guess that you didnt get Medicare 4 All because people went :

"4 All? But like, not those people too, surely? Oh hell no. Something something socialism bad."

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 4d (6 replies)

No, we didn't get it because our politicians are partly owned by the insurance companies.

The majority of people want Medicare for all and even more if you explain it without including the name.

ViceroTempus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 4d (5 replies)

We nearly had a public option in the Affordable Care Act, but then Democrats watered down their proposal before it ever went to up for an actual vote thanks to Lieberman. Which of course ended up making it a huge boon to the insurance companies, resulting in our current state of affairs.

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3d (4 replies)

The public option was never going to be in the final bill. It was there to be negotiated out for republican votes. When they refused to play ball, Lieberman had to play the part of the bad guy.

ViceroTempus@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d (3 replies)

Lol, they had a super majority at the time. They never needed the Republican votes.

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d (2 replies)

A large part of the democratic party identity at the time was bipartisanship. They used that as an excuse to water down any sort of public good legislation. It's why they started with a republican health insurance reform bill instead of single payer and it's why they ended up negotiating against themselves to drop the public option in the end.

ViceroTempus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

I'm well aware. Still doesn't change the fact that it was a self-inflicted wound, and that they took out a public option when they didn't need to.

HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d

That's the meme, but I think it's more that insurance companies spend fortunes to bribe lobby for politicians to vote against it, not to mention fortunes in propaganda to push the narrative that universal healthcare is more expensive.

raze2012@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 4d

Universal healthcare is actually a bipartisan issue among the people. But as you expect, one side is really good at reframing terms to make it sound like It benefits the "non-deserving". The main "issue" over the decades is that everytime they try to creep this into making all insurance worse they get pushback.

So, kinda.

bitwolf@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 3d

I didn't even get to use my insurance.

We met our deductible for a baby. A month before birth our company switched insurance providers. Back to zero. I'm still paying hospital bills 7 months later.

mrmisses@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d (6 replies)

How did you see a doctor if you didn't make an appointment before September? It takes 4-5 months to see a doctor where I live. This country is such shit

notabot@piefed.social · 3 pts · 3d (5 replies)

How do you know you'll need a doctor in 4 months??!? How do the other people booking that far out know they'll need one? When you need a doctor, you need one soon, preferably today. Do you just book an appointment per week and cancel if you don't need it?

mrmisses@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d (3 replies)

If it's an emergency - the er. If it's not an emergency - an "Urgent Care" type place. But not your actual Dr unless you plan months in advance.

notabot@piefed.social · 2 pts · 3d (2 replies)

Are we talking "no, sorry I can't get a chest infection right now, I need to schedule an appointment with the doctor firat, but I should be able to fit you in in 4 months or so"? I ask because I know the US healthcare system is bad, but I have difficulty judging how bad.

frongt@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 3d

If you have an urgent problem you go to urgent care. I had one, I went to urgent care after work, I got seen, got the prescription, and went home and got my pills.

If you say "hey I have this problem where my back hurts sometimes" then they'll schedule you for the next available appointment. Depending on how busy they are, yes that could be months out. You might try a different doctor if you can.

mrmisses@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

I feel like I answered this question in the post you are responding to?

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

It helps if you tell them that you e met your deductible, which means you are now a bottomless pit of health insurance money, and want to schedule all the tests you've been putting off. They'll find room in the schedule.

kestrel7_7@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

Medicare for all will happen once enough Americans figure out that $2000/year in taxes is less than $8000/year in premiums/deductibles. So it could take awhile.

a1tsca13@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 4d (5 replies)

92% not going and yet I still have to wait 6-8 weeks for a visit with my PCP, to be mostly ignored and referred to a specialist, then 6+ months for a specialist to be told I need to go back to my PCP to redo all the diagnostics they did at referral because the results are too old now...

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

that is annoying. i have something similar happen. i messaged online portal my derm recently about a rash , and he basically was annoyed and said go to your Pcp to be treated about this "simple problem".

jpreston2005@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 4d (3 replies)

PCP visit is supposed to be scheduled in advance, because it's not an emergency. If you ask for a sooner appointment, they can call you when a cancellation occurs and see you sooner.

a1tsca13@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d (1 reply)

My bad - next time I have an unexpected but non-emergency medical issue I'll be sure to plan it in advance.

It's not like I'm not already asking for the first available. The only reason I've ever had any of them call me is to tell me my appointment has been pushed several weeks to a time I can't make and moved to a town an hour away.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 3d

doesnt your healthcare provider have an online portal? cant you contact them about the results ahead of time?

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

not all the time, they can have emergency appts, and sometimes they also bring in a roving specialist. it depends on your insurance, and the network.

then_three_more@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 4d (4 replies)

Brits love to complain about the NHS, and rightly. After 14 years of right wing governments underfunding it it's on it's knees.

However if someone tried to replace it with an American style system we'd make the way the French protest look tame.

porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml · 32 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Sorry but I doubt it. Brits are really not good at standing up for themselves. They are replacing it with an American style system, just a little bit at a time. In the last 30 years it's come about half way, and it might take another couple decades to really finish the job, but I think it's likely they'll succeed in the end.

Dingo_Kidneys@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 4d

Just waiting for that one really charismatic Tori to come out and say the NHS is the problem. Thatcher 2 is gonna be hilarious

architect@thelemmy.club · 8 pts · 4d

No you won’t. You’d take it like we did.

Bahnd@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d

[In the voice of Mr. Perfect Cell]

So...um... What are you going to do to them?

bitwolf@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 3d (1 reply)

All of the hospitals in my state were purchased by Atlantic Health.

My friend works for the hospital. The highlight of their quarterly meeting is how much profit the hospital now makes.

Why do hospitals need to make profit?!

Why are corporate owned hospitals even legal?!

I hate this timeline.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 3d

equity firms are ruining healthcare, by staffing less doctors in some areas.

abrake@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 4d (7 replies)

The survey that the article is based on seems pretty fishy to me. It's conducted by some financial services company that is mostly involved in selling financial products, not doing research. The methodology section is pretty threadbare and they don't provide the survey data itself.

The figures are also way out of line with more reputable research organizations like the KFF which estimates that 17% of Americans delay or avoid healthcare due cost.

Is 17% still really high and an unethical travesty in the wealthiest country on earth? Yeah. But there's no way that 92% of people are skipping the doctor due to cost. Just as an example, the top quintile of earners in the US make more than 300k per year. I doubt that anyone in that group in delaying or avoiding healthcare due to costs and yet the survey would mean that a good chunk of them are.

Abyssian@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 4d (2 replies)

There's no way it's only 17%. The percentage of uninsured was estimated over 8% in 2024, before insurance premiums skyrocketed and Republicans voting to kick millions off of Medicaid.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 4d (1 reply)

isnt MEHMET oz/RFK JR, trying to get medicaid/care to only apply if the patient/enrolle is working 80hrs/month(this automatically puts people over the medicaid limit already by default for most states)

Abyssian@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

I don't know any specifics other than they're trying to make sure health care costs go up until only the wealthy can ever get medical assistance, that the poor can't get any kind of help with affording those costs, and that as many lower income babies as possible die from diseases we can easily vaccinate against as possible.

And to make sure there's no such thing as gender affirming care for trans folks, so that Republicans can feel safe raping whatever child or adult they pick out without having to worry it might make them gay.

mechoman444@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 4d

Exactly. There was an article on here that said that self check out saved grocery stores 300 billion dollars a year when total revenue for the entire grocery industry is a trillion dollars.

This sub needs significantly better fact checking and moderation. This is obviously a nonsense article with a nonsense number with a % sign after it.

BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk · 4 pts · 4d

The survey showed that over nine in ten (92%) of insured respondents had delayed or avoided medical care because of concern about cost.

But the methodology seems wonky indeed, 1507 should be a decent sample size for statistical purposes. But half of the respondents are self-employed and only 1% is unemployed, which explains the "average out of pocket per income level" section, flying all over the place.

But 92% of insured, having delayed medical care is a massive finding.

Although the methodology makes one raise eyebrows, for how they're able to include income brackets of "0$", as that at most seems to be 15 respondents.

Addition, at a second look they claim .5% are in the no income bracket. Which is 7/8 respondents. Why would they even include that section then?

kungen@feddit.nu · 2 pts · 4d (1 reply)

I guess there's also different levels of "skipping". If I was an American, I'd be skipping it unless I'm deathly suffering, whereas here I'd go if it's sufficiently debilitating.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 4d

or people also s kipping because thier doctors are doing the bare minimum, or half assed with an appointment, and then becoming annoyed with them, and the patients wait it out if thier symptoms improved, because going to doc would result in the same lame thing.

BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 4d (1 reply)

And they are still paying for that insurance they can't afford to use.

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 4d

That's so you'll just go bankrupt instead of thrown out on the street to die.

GutterRat42@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 3d

It is cheaper to keep people healthy through preventive care than it is to treat illness. From a taxpayer point of view, a single payer system would save us money.

But people are so propagandized in this country that they seriously think private insurance is the better option.

AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net · 16 pts · 4d (1 reply)

I don't have data, but as a pharmacy worker one thing that seems very apparent to me is people with non-european/white names getting way more insurance rejections.

Also, insulin and inhalers should not be so consistently headaches to deal with. Inhaler insurance issues make me want to rip my hair out.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

im not surprised, they probably "statistically" think with data that poc are likely lower income earners and are less likely to afford insurance long term, or pay out of pocket for expensive procedures, medications and would drop insurance at the moments notice. they know white people are often gainfully employed in higher salary jobs, if not wealthy and are good on thier payments for everything for healthcare. white people have better outcome for healthcare than POCs as a result, of being in higher paid jobs. also poc tend to have more chronic issues that are often neglected or go untreated for long and is expensive to the companies, because they want to avoid paying too much to go the doctors in the first place. while caucasians/european tend to see doctors the first thing they suspect something is wrong.

coming from a poc family, we often put of some medical issues until it gets hard to ignore.

plyth@feddit.org · 15 pts · 4d (25 replies)

Is this true? How do people vote for parties that don't change it?

frisbird@lemmy.ml · 24 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Which parties change it?

M0oP0o@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 4d

My guess is the 3rd one, or maybe 4th or 5th.... Oh yeah...

floofloof@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 4d (7 replies)

Many are convinced you can't have freedom and an affordable doctor at the same time. Americans are subjected to extraordinary levels of propaganda.

Kage520@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d

I don't think the freedom part is accurate, but the propaganda certainly is. The news tells them what to think and they don't try further. They are convinced the United States has the best healthcare in the world, so nice, it cannot be put into a more affordable model without becoming unusably bad. They believe the Magic Market has created the absolute best and cheapest option out there, and the government can only mess that up. Individually, to those who use it, you almost always get complaints as we find ways to make it MORE inaccessible and MORE expensive (eg, concierge doctors), but even those people believe this is the best and cheapest way to do it. They themselves just got unlucky for their personal and not unique situation. The news told them so.

kinsnik@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d (5 replies)

Propaganda has some people convinced that universal healthcare means having to wait for weeks for a medical appointment, and also that even that (made up) problem is worse than not being able to afford to go to the doctor at all

grue@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 4d

Meanwhile, even if you can afford it, you have to wait for weeks for an appointment under the current system anyway.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 4d

The real propaganda is getting those people to someone forget that's already how it fucking works in the US

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 4d (2 replies)

dont you months or years, even in places with "low cost or free" it isnt that long. in the states some healthcare providers have weeks or months out for an appointment.

floofloof@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Where I am in Canada we do have problems with wait times, and many people can't find a family doctor. But it wasn't always like this. Successive Conservative provincial governments have cut healthcare funding again and again, trying to force people into private for-profit healthcare. It's the same story in the UK: public healthcare has been undermined by every government since Thatcher's in the 1980s, and the NHS is not what it was.

Both are still better than the US system though, even after all the cuts. I usually have to wait about 2 weeks to see my doctor unless it's an emergency. Emergencies can mean an hours-long wait at the hospital. I was recently admitted after an emergency and needed surgery and follow-up examinations including MRI, EKG, ECG, and a whole bunch of other tests with specialists. The care has been very thorough and the doctors excellent, and I have not had to worry once about costs.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 4d

Don't let anyone ever try to tell you that we don't have massive wait time issues in the US. We do.

Steve@communick.news · 10 pts · 4d

For roughly 40 years now, no party has been all that serous about changing it?

ryannathans@aussie.zone · 8 pts · 4d (13 replies)

They don't have preferential voting in the US so they're effectively limited to two parties

M0oP0o@mander.xyz · 5 pts · 4d (9 replies)

Way worse, they are limited to two parties with the electoral collage system. Not just effectively but in law and policy.

Its not a functioning democracy.

ryannathans@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 4d (8 replies)

How is that true when there's a libertarian party that gets votes?

M0oP0o@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 4d (7 replies)

Getting votes and getting power are not the same thing. There is no path to president for any party outside of rebpublican or democrats. The electoral college of the states stops any 3rd party from holding any power at a federal level. The last time there was even a chance was the bull moose party and even Teddy at the hight of his popularity could not overcome the two party system back then, and they have since tightened the system down.

ryannathans@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 4d (6 replies)

I'm gonna need you to point out very specifically what law prevents the libertarians from gaining power and presidency if they get enough votes. I don't see how the electoral college stops them, or any third party, gaining power with enough votes

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d (5 replies)

There isn't one, just a lot of little rules that add up.

ryannathans@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 3d

Such as?

plyth@feddit.org · 3 pts · 4d (2 replies)

But if 92% are seriously affected I would assume that some people could found a single topic party and that they would be elected immediately.

ryannathans@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 4d

I think you'll find a major asterisk on that 92% stat if looking hard enough

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d

Oh this is just one of many issues for which the public disagrees with the politicians. They do not work for us in the slightest. They work for the rich. This has been a known fact for decades. Even the supposedly good politicians capitulate for unity and soften "eat the rich" to "tax the rich".

Now they're just seeing how hard they can push before people fight back. With any luck, they're just as stupid as the voting public.

Formfiller@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 4d

Time off work is also a huge factor

echodot@feddit.uk · 12 pts · 4d (1 reply)

If you're screwed up political system that's responsible. I'm pretty sure the US is the only country in the world where bribes are actually legal. Bribery is illegal even in Russia even if it isn't actually enforced but at least they don't pretend that what they're doing is right.

You won't move over to green energy even though it's more economically viable because of lobbyists.
You have private health care because of lobbyists.
Your food would be considered toxic by every other nation, but it's allowed because of lobbyists.

By all means shoot some health insurance CEOs nobody will shead the tear for them, but they are the symptom not the cause. If your country allows lobbying then don't be surprised that you get lobbyists.

Doomsider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d

Every country has bribery and many countries, like the US, formalize a bribery system into law by putting in limitations and adding recording requirements.

I think you point out correctly that powerful special interests use things like lobbying and regulatory capture to control government policy.

The cause is the real issue that no one wants to talk about because it means taking a cold hard look at ourselves and behavior. I would argue it is ultimately a cultural issue so fixing our policies will not be enough to affect change.

M0oP0o@mander.xyz · 11 pts · 4d

The health insurance industry must be dissolved & all of its executives criminally prosecuted for murder, conspiracy, and treason.

I think the end of the states is more likely and easier at this point. That broken ass system is just embedded too deep.

Flatulent69Iguana@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 4d (3 replies)

Such a big task infront of future american generations if it survives. I was baffled the other day when I heard an american be surprised the rest of the world have unfavorable opinions of them. I think the first issue to tackle is education.

echodot@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 4d

North Korea and China wish they could have the level of indoctrination that the average American has.

A good chunk of them genuinely do think they live in the best country in the world, and they have no idea that they don't. They really don't know how screwed over they are by the government because they never leave the country, so they never realize. Until that changes there will never be a massive movement for political reform

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

did they all just wake up, im from the us. alot of moives/shows have made jokes about americans being villified in other countries, when they tour there. FG/ american dad did a skit how they slapped a canadian flag on them, to let the see theya re not from america.

architect@thelemmy.club · 0 pts · 4d

I bet 60% of Americans are too stupid to understand the world hates them right now. I feel like it’s most people I know.

jpreston2005@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 4d (3 replies)

70,000 Americans die every year due to lack of access to health care.

How quickly do you think an issue would be addressed if it killed 70 billionaires a year?

raze2012@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 4d (1 reply)

if it killed even 1 we'd have a bill passed next week. For the billionaires, ofc. But they'd react fast.

Never fall under the delusion that the government needs everything to move like molasses.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

also they single issues like healthcare, medicaid, or funding education keeps politicians elected, if they solved all those than there are no reason to elect most of them.

MonkeMischief@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

Or even 7?

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 3d (6 replies)

I just spent 5grand out of pocket because the doctor made me take a sleep test. They charged insurance nearly 20 grand.

They told me they found nothing and I was fine. I pointed out some flaws in their test but they weren’t interested in my opinion.

I cancelled my follow up appointment bc I can’t afford it, at least until this is paid off.

Also, I am not fine. I am very very tired.

Did you know if you meet your deductible they will won’t pay until you also meet the Out of Pocket Maximum? What’s the point of the deductible? I have no idea.

frongt@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 3d

If your deductible is $50 or 20% then you pay that, until you accumulate enough to hit the out of pocket max, then you pay nothing.

Tikiporch@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Damn. $20k! The at home sleep test wouldn't suffice?

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2d

No, they made me take the home test in Independence Day. That’s a hard day for my dogs. I didn’t sleep well either.

I scored 1 point over the line for Sleep Apnea.

captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Deductible is supposed to be the amount you pay 100% for, followed by a pre agreed percentage until your out of pocket maximum where you pay nothing

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2d

You are right. I am learning this the hard way. Not that I have any say in my own health insurance anyway.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

not surprised. i want to eventually try a biologic for my condition, and you know how most insurance will try to give you the run around, or a long list of requirments. also its expensive as well.

Napster153@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 3d (2 replies)

This is the exact set up for a Black Plague event. I know people tend to hold a grudge over the Covid Lockdown, but do we really need to see bodies topple on the street before realisation is made?

This makes every zombie movie way more realistic than it has any right to be.

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d

People have alway been stupid.

100 years ago during the spanish flu we had the exact same shit we had today. idiots spewing pseudoscience, idiots saying its just a cold, idiots saying masks are worse for your health than a "minor" infection, etc etc.

and I imagine you'd run into the same kind of sentiments no matter how far you go back in history.

Because people are stupid. People are myopic.

Individuals may be empathic and genuinely care and do everything they can, but the majority are just mouth breathing plague carrying idiots whose greatest achievement in life is not drowning in the rain.

MonkeMischief@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

A zombie movie realized would be so stupid...it sucks we're in the stupid timeline. ._.

dregan@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 4d

For me, I think it's more the unpleasantness of being ripped off than affordability. It's such a fucking scam.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 9 pts · 4d (3 replies)

also some doctors are jaded asf, if they see a couple times in a row they become frustrated and annoyed with you.

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 2 pts · 4d (2 replies)

I want a doctor that became a doctor because they wanted to help people, and not because of the money and/or their parents riding their ass to become one. Also they graduated with straight As. Nobody wants the doctor that barely passed with Ds.

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 4d

If Ds are actually Fs, then they'll get rid of Ds and then teachers will just make the tests easier. Someone decided this person's knowledge was enough to progress.

jpreston2005@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d

The costs of medical school make this an impossible ask. The only people that can go to medical school are the people that have rich parents, or are OK with leveraging their future for the chance at becoming a successful doctor. Things go wrong in peoples lives all the time, school gets interrupted all the time. Asking people who just want to help others to pay $300k for the privilege of attempting to get to that point is literally insane. We also have a huge shortage of doctors. Go figure.

AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d

Smells like freedom. No wait, kinda like burning toast? I'd go to the doctor but it's too expensive.

mojo_raisin@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 3d

Remember, billionaires are nothing without their enablers like your local news anchors lying to you, their protectors like your local PD, or your neighbors in the military who would take orders to kill you for standing up for yourself and your community. Billionaires are inaccessible, their protectors and enablers are not.

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3d (2 replies)

I have not had insurance my entire adult life, because it was too expensive, and the jobs I was able to work didnt offer it. So I only go once a year, when I'm forced to in order to get my meds for the next year.. and any issues I have, I hope and pray linger until this appointment, because I cant afford to pay 200+ dollars every time i have an issue that i need a doctor for.

the only experience I've had with insurance, in my adult life, is handling an elderly relatives medical issues. They have medicare.

Medicare is fucking awesome. Anything they need, poof, its done. no delays, no awaiting approvals, just get it fucking done. Most of their drugs are free (at least until trump gets rid of part d..), and the one that isnt, is only like 5 dollars, for a 90 day supply (so 20 bucks a year for meds). They have had multiple major surgeries, and the copay was like 30 dollars each time.

Not once have they ever been told they cant have a treatment, or that they have to go through some bullshit process of trying 3 other things before they can get the treatment the doctor orders, nothing.

Medicare is fucking awesome and everyone should have it.

Noobnarski@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (1 reply)

The experience with medicare is basically how it is for almost every person in Germany (public health insurance).

The only thing the doctor/hospital care about is that you have the card, you put it into a card reader and that's it. There is also a small part that you have to pay of the price of drugs if you pick them up at a pharmacy.

My wife recently gave birth and the only costs we will have to pay are around 10€ per day for her stay and we had a family room for a few days, which means I could sleep and got food there too, which will cost 50€ per day or so. I don't even know how much the insurance will have to pay to the hospital, it doesn't affect me.

So with insurance it is really cheap and without insurance it would probably still be much cheaper than anything in the US.

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d

I wish I lived in a civilized country.

Syndication@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 4d
[ removed ]
PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au · 6 pts · 4d

Awww we have abundance? The world is always getting better? Science is so cool? We can do so much more?

Who's we? I had to stitch an injury up with a sewing kit last week. I didn't get antibiotics. Half my friends don't get to sleep in houses. I'm the only person I know who regularly eats real food without fear of shitting myself because my entire apartment is shelves full of dirt and grow lights.

InvalidName2@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 2d (1 reply)

Even for me, with health insurance, one of the reasons I tend not to seek health care is due to the surprise and unpredictable costs. I've already fallen into that trap twice this year alone.

The very first thing I did when I was choosing a plan for this year was filter the list down to the ones I could afford which said they covered all my prescription meds and for which my current health providers were "in-network". That left 2 options.

When I went to get my first round of refills, several months into the year, they said I had to have prior authorization for one of my meds. After going through that process several times, provider who writes the prescription has to jump through the hoops with insurance to get the authorization, the insurance finally came back and said "we don't/won't cover this prescription." My provider was able to find a cheaper, older alternative that works, but I pay out of pocket 100% for it.

Then came my annual physical, which is free with insurance. Because of the meds I'm on, the nurse said they needed to do some blood tests to check for signs of problems. Never mentioned that those tests would cost me extra and obviously I did not know. Wouldn't have mattered, because they wouldn't have been able to tell me up front how much it would cost so that I could make a financial decision about it. In the end, that free annual visit cost me almost $400 that I was not anticipating. The bills started showing up months later, so it completely blindsided me.

Last year was even worse. I had one of the best insurance plans offered through the ACA. Then I had an accident that landed me in the hospital. The ambulance ride was not covered at all, the service was "out-of-network" so I had to pay 100% of that. The 2 tylenol I was given for pain management in the emergency room cost me $40 because insurance would not pay for them without prior authorization. I hesitated to even call for help, hoping I could stop the bleeding myself, because I knew it was going to be an expensive trip to the ER and boy was it ever. Not to mention the follow-up appointments and treatment that was required.

Folstar@lemmus.org · 4 pts · 2d

Same. I had to have a CT brainscan this year. The scan was ordered during my annual physical based on routine questioning so I thought nothing of it. Many moons ago I had to have a CT brainscan in the ER and it cost like $25 with insurance. I figured, surely this scan that is being scheduled would cost the same or possibly less, so nothing to worry about. Nope! $500 for the exact same procedure on the exact same machine with the same insurance plan.

100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it · 5 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Healthcare in my country sucks and politicians have been trying to destroy what's left for forty years, but healthcare in the US reads like a page ripped off from a dystopia.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

we also have the strange thing of tying it to full time jobs+insurance. also plus employer negotiated insurance have better deals (more coverage less deductibles,,,etc)than individual plans purchased on an exchange website.

lukaro@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 3d (1 reply)

I can afford to go to the doctor, I just can' afford that and the time off work to go.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

same here, partially. cant even get dental planned out. also because i make more than the income for state subsidized healthcare, so i buy private insurance, and dental has no such thing on those plans. also other errands i want run.

douglasg14b@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Going to the doctor costs like $400-500

It's insane

And It's the corporation that runs the clinic that gets to see the benefits from that, not the doctors

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

technically more than that if you include preniums, and and co-pays, and other stuff they wont cover.

joecitizen@piefed.ca · 5 pts · 4d

Enjoy the decline.

SalamiDommie@lemmus.org · 5 pts · 3d

The leadership of US medical of the last 25 years should be prosecuted, have their wealth taken from them, and their kin removed with them on a biblical scale.

The removal method? Guillotine

kestrel7_7@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3d (1 reply)

There's also those in the opposite situation: Stuck unemployed on Medicare because getting a job would make necessary healthcare too expensive. What a country

Sunflier@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

PlasmaTrout@lemmy.wtf · 5 pts · 3d

Yes. Pretty much all I can say living here for 55+ years. Yes.

PattyMcB@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 4d

Count me as one. I can't be bothered to take the time off or pay for a diagnostic procedure. If it found something, I'd be extra fucked anyway. Why bother?

jrotermund@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 4d (5 replies)

Why is it shocking? The us is a capitalist and egocentric entity. It is the greed and the violence. The result is they don‘t care for each other. And you know it.🤷

jpreston2005@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d (3 replies)

It is ignorant and bigoted to say that Americans don't care about one another. Literally the most charitable nation.

Cricket@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 3d (2 replies)

Literally the most charitable nation.

What do you mean by that?

jpreston2005@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Ah well we used to be #1, I forgot we've dipped since the antichrist took over

Cricket@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2d

I wasn't sure if you were being sarcastic. I had only heard of the US being #1 in raw dollar figures, and that was because it is (was?) the largest economy in the world. In terms of percentage of GDP, I've never heard of the US being #1 in foreign aid. There were usually several other countries ahead when I've heard of rankings. However, I don't know if that was always the case and never looked it up.

Dingo_Kidneys@lemmy.today · -2 pts · 4d

It's lowkey true, if presumptive. People migrate here literally for the ability to dictate the lives of others and form their own little kingdoms. They'll do this even if it pushes them into bankruptcy or death. The promise of being a sovereign is often more alluring than reforming any of these systems for the public good. Better yet, most of them don't even consider the public good. The world just stops materializing past their fov.

Heikki2@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d (3 replies)

I've been putting off allergies/sinus issue for a bit, just to hoping it would go away on its own. This morning I woke up with a sore left ear and jaw. I could hear the bubbling in my ear. Took some Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen to help. The pain returned by lunch. Decided to go get it looked at on insurance. Still cost $310 to get some Amoxacillian prescribed. I am fortunate to be able to afford it and yet it still hurt me financially.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
Heikki2@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d (1 reply)

I guess I didn't explain it well. The doctors visit was $310. The prescription was $6. I should have said it the visit cost $310 and all they did was look at my ear for 30seconds and prescribe me Amoxacillian

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 2d

that seems to be the average cost of doc visits, uninsured. my hmo is around the same, if i wanst covered, and specialists are over 420+

JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org · 3 pts · 4d

Does anyone have more information than a screenshot of a headline?

doingthestuff@lemy.lol · 3 pts · 2d

I've been to the doctor twice in the last 20 years and one of them was an emergency. It has been longer for the dentist.

Katana314@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d

There are other reasons - one being that doctors aren't really offering treatments, just finagling their way to defining a "solution" or excuse for the symptoms you're exhibiting. Many people experiencing problems are out looking for their own solutions. I don't blame poor medical training, just the squeezing of their metrics for maximum profit.

Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 3d

Ah yes. Freedom. Don't y'all love it?

SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d

Thinning the herd, just as Project 2025 planned.

BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk · 2 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Meanwhile me with gay healthcare, is going to see specialists within the broader category of my niche disease.

Although to be fair, it took 1.5 years to get an appointment, availability have declined the past few decades

postmateDumbass@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

They will disqualify you if they think you have ever touched a vagina.

jobbies@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 3d (8 replies)
[ removed ]
chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3d (5 replies)

We have the same problem.

I have "good insurance", but it still takes 6 weeks to get an appointment. It's why "Urgent Care" clinics are taking over. They cost more than a GP, but less than an ER, but don't require appointments.

We also have places that pretty much pretend to be urgent cares, but have an ambulance parked out back so are technically an emergency room, and you don't realize it until you get a $1900 bill in the mail for your ear infection.

And then we have Urgent Care + ER places that are Urgent care during business hours, but after hours change into ERs, so if it takes too long to get in to the the NP your bill jumps 20 fold.

jobbies@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 3d (4 replies)

until you get a $1900 bill in the mail for your ear infection

Jeez. Isnt it covered by Insurance?

chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d (2 replies)

Usually for hospital visits, your plan either has an annual deductible that must be met (e.g. $5,000) before insurance contributes, or on a better plan you have a co-pay where insurance will cover 60% while you cover 40% up to a different annual deductible ("Maximum out of pocket").

The shitty thing is the insurance companies make deals with the providers along the lines of "We'll pay $X or 20% of the sticker price for Y procedure, whichever is lower", so the hospitals increase their price to 5 times the insurance rate to maximize their income. The do this so it's financially ruinous not to have insurance.

So the patient on the good plans get charged double the insurance company's rate (that the insurance companies only pay after you've reached maximum out of pocket), while the insurance company doesn't actually pay anything on their "60%" co-pay.

And you and your employer end up paying the insurance company like $1200/month combined for this service.

And if you get really sick, you lose your job and therefore your insurance.

It's a truly fucked system.

jobbies@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Fuck me. Blows my mind that the system allows profiting on folks lives and wellbeing.

MonkeMischief@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

Allows?

I hate to be a doomer but at this point it's practically foundationally built on that very concept. It depends on profiting on peoples' desperation and wellbeing to sustain itself.

That's why it needs to be scrapped and rebuilt entirely.

anewfox@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 3d

narp.

and sometimes the bill is even higher with insurance because you aren't eligible for uninsured discounts.

BillCheddar@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Bullshit

jobbies@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 3d

No honest. Unless you're willing to wait 4 to 6 weeks.

Zephyr@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d

It would be better if it actually was an open market like Japans medical system. They cap the profits on materials and treatment. They also have to list prices so you can actually compare and contrast the costs of treatment. Insurance companies are now the backbone of the US medical system, even owning and operating entire medical providers. Their business model is to maximize profits and deny care wherever possible. It'll be difficult to dismantle that relationship now.

rollerbang@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d

Just think of all the missed revenue in both insurance and medical sectors /s

Evotech@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d

Then why aren’t they going?

Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d

in another time, that would have a better chance of happening since we used to go after racketeers. now, we have them in the actual government so thats not even in consideration

EqualEarthling@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d (6 replies)
[ removed ]
village604@adultswim.fan · 4 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Large sample sizes have issues too. You can't base the validity of a study only on the sample size.

notabot@piefed.social · 1 pts · 3d

You can't base it only on sample size, no, but a small sample size does increase the uncertainty.

RBWells@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d (1 reply)

I make pretty good money and have insurance (sort of) but absolutely have avoided care for financial reasons and I don't actually know anyone who hasn't. Do you know someone who has never considered cost?

EqualEarthling@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d
[ removed ]
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 4d (1 reply)

I mean...I regularly see a primary care physician, a dentist, an optometrist, and a dermatologist. and I'm NOT in the top 8%.

jpreston2005@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

I finally have a PCP, but I also need a couple teeth pulled due to enamel loss, that I've been putting off, because dealing with the pain is cheaper. I'm covered in freckles, and my family has a history of skin cancer, but I don't go to the dermatologist, because last time I did they spent 45 seconds looking at my entire freckle covered body before confidently saying "nope! no skin cancer there!" I asked for pictures so they could compare to future visits, they said they don't do that there. I haven't been back. Probably won't until I can identify the cancer myself and gee, I sure hope it's on a part of my body I can regularly see in the mirror. My arm has felt like it was badly dislocated in my teens, and has hurt ever since, but that would require an extra doctor visit, and more tests, so no.

a bat got into my house while I slept, and I woke up to him on me. Me with the best insurance policy my good employer offers went to the hospital (the only place that actually carries the rabies vaccine), they wanted me to pay $1800 for it, after swearing up and down it'd be free after I paid my $150 dollar copay.

I'm not in the 8% either.

70,000 Americans die every year due to lack of access to health care.

530,000 Americans file for bankruptcy every year due to medical bills.

Eh_I@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d

I stopped going, time and money

alltomorrowsregrets@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d

Instead of prosecution couldn't the executives be dissolved too?

sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 4d
[ removed ]
supersquirrel@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 3d

Me neither

Polisheocket@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Can you imagine, and I’m not saying it’s wrong, but the initial wait times if/ when it becomes free? Like it will take 3-5 years to sort itself out

SparroHawc@piefed.world · 3 pts · 4d

Yup. Same thing Canada went through.

Of course, wait times are atrocious right now in the USA anyways.

motruck@lemmy.zip · -3 pts · 2d (1 reply)

I call bullshit on this stat

Snapz@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2d

Cool. You did it.

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 3d (7 replies)

And democrats will brag about how they fixed healthcare 15 years ago by killing the public option.

PokerChips@programming.dev · 4 pts · 3d (6 replies)

Odd thing to say. Democrats fought FOR the public option.

Why would they brag about killing something that they tried to create?

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 3d (5 replies)

Odd thing to say. Democrats fought FOR the public option.

If you take the wing of the party that demands unquestioning support for genocide at their word, sure.

I don't give the genocide wing the benefit of the doubt. The idea from the outset was to kill the public option with just enough no votes.

Congratulations on "fixing" healthcare. For the insurance industry and not the people they exploit.

PokerChips@programming.dev · 0 pts · 3d (4 replies)

I don't have to take any wing at they're word. I just have to look at their votes. Lieberman is the ire of your disdain. They needed 60 votes. They "only" had 59.

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d (3 replies)

It's always hilarious watching the supporters of the wing that killed the public option pretending that Lieberman was the only one.

Bdn Nelson also blocked the public option so people could go bankrupt and die to pad donors' wallets.

And let's not pretend that Lieberman wasn't democrats' VP candidate in 2000.

PokerChips@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1d (2 replies)

If he was a candidate, I guess nobody gave a shit. And when the fuck did I say that I support any wing of the Democratic party. I'm just reminding you of facts. They had 59 votes at their height. That's a fact.

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1d (1 reply)

And if they didn't like people going bankrupt and dying to support the insurance industry, they could have changed the senate rules with only 50.

Since democrats always intended to kill the public option, they didn't. And you'll make excuses for them forever.

The people made it clear that they wanted a public option when they preferred Obama over Clinton. The shit wing of the party that you make excuses for killed it.

PokerChips@programming.dev · 0 pts · 1d

I'm not making excuses for anyone in telling what happened.

Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 3d (10 replies)

Not dissolved but it needs to be severely overhauled and they should be require to have actual medical knowledge.

MBech@feddit.dk · 4 pts · 3d (9 replies)

Why would you want a system that introduces middle men and a need to turn a profit off of your health?

Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (8 replies)

because there's going to need be a system in place anyways and doctors are gonna make money off you regardless.

MBech@feddit.dk · 1 pts · 3d (7 replies)

Does there need to be a system? USA is the only rich country that seems to think so... My doctor doesn't charge me, they charge the government. Hell, even parking is free.

Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (6 replies)

You're still paying in taxes nothing is free. They're charging your government and your government is making you pay for it through taxes. It's just routed differently. In the US it's more direct to the patient and/or customer. Which is why it would make sense at the very least, to have people with medical knowledge not just insurance knowledge because then the common sense of does this person need to be covered for an inhaler or an epipen wouldn't even be asked.

In the US it's more direct to the patient and/or customer.

what comes with this is a lot of hardships and it's not the greatest thing. one prime example is how state insurance and medicaid don't have many options for mental health specialists and you're given a list of numbers that no one at the desk knows how to talk about insurance because they're medical receptionists and just deal with making appointments; which is why I've come to figure out it's better to get in direct contact with insurance departments before you go to make an appointment or call to make an appointment.

it's pretty messy but insurance does at least cover the run-around basic appointments with primary care doctors but insurance takes forever to approve shit like mri's and stuff you really should be getting done sooner and it's not even because of a doctors schedule it's because the insurance has to deem it necessary after your doctor ordered it.

That's where I can see people getting pissed off about insurance. Is your insured and people who have little to no medical knowledge are the ones approving your medical services and medications after your doctor already said you need it done.

So for example, you go to see the medical professional for a rescue inhaler and the people who are not medical professionals go, no you don't need that to breathe.

MBech@feddit.dk · 2 pts · 3d (5 replies)

I'm still not seeing why the extra step of a for profit insurance company is ever needed? All it does is raise prices and make life harder for the people in need. Get rid of it, and your money is spent much more directly without someone denying you medical care because they see you as an expense.

It's also important to note that my doctor doesn't charge my government for anything. They're employed directly by the government, which means the government is determining what the cost of a procedure is, instead of the doctor. This lowers the price because you cut out another for profit middleman.

This also means my government has that same person with medical knowledge to determine wether or not a procedure is actually necrssary that you're requesting. The same doctor you visited.

Medical insurance companies and privately owned medical care is ALL just unecessary middlemen that make your life worse. They're not needed, and needs to be removed entirely.

Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 2d (4 replies)

Medical insurance companies and privately owned medical care is ALL just unecessary middlemen that make your life worse. They’re not needed, and needs to be removed entirely

They do suck but if they weren't there who's paying the actual price? It's 20k$ for some shit to get done and with insurance it brings it down to like 300$

MBech@feddit.dk · 1 pts · 2d

Your taxes. In no other country does the procedure actually cost 20k. It's been inflated to ridiculous amounts by the doctors because the insurance pays it.